My recent cheeky essay comparing a newer GMC crew cab pickup, along with a fairly recent Dodge Ram, to an early ’90s Dodge was quite intentional. Not only did it show the hyperbole often used to describe the physical size of new pickups is primarily just that, it also seemed like a good warm-up for writing about this 1972 Chevrolet C-10. Sometimes one needs to prime the well to extract some creativity for other uses.
Inspiration did indeed hit; well, at least it formed itself into something coherent. This old C-10 has been moldering on my hard drive for entirely too long. That’s sad given this is my favorite Chevrolet pickup of all time.
Long ago Willie Nelson, Kris Kristofferson, Waylon Jennings, and Johnny Cash sang the ultimate country song. Unlike the stereotypical country song about grandma getting hit by a train after leaving a tavern while carrying her handmade quilt home from prison, The Highwayman was much deeper. Truly, how many country songs, or songs of any genre, are about reincarnation? For this generation of Chevrolet pickup, the one that is worked, refurbished, worked more, then refurbished again, often swapping owners with every iteration and having a different purpose each time, it seemed rather appropriate.
This old Chevrolet was eagerly awaiting another new owner back in 2013, preferably someone who had $6,000 in cash. While there is abundant exaggeration in regard to newer pickups, particularly crew cabs it seems, the assertion of them often looking hyper-aggressive does have validity. The 1972 C-10 is rather the antithesis of this contention as it has one of the friendliest faces ever for a pickup. Looking at it just makes a person feel better about everything.
Another 1972 C-10, in a darker shade of factory applied red, most likely what Chevrolet called “Crimson Red”, plays into this perception. My grandfather Albert purchased one new and it was around for my first six to seven years. But we’ll come back to that.
Model year 1966 had served as a sort of transition year between generations of bow-tie haulers. That final year of the prior generation saw the new availability of a three-speed Turbo Hydramatic transmission, the 250 cubic inch six replacing the old 230 six, and the 327 cubic inch V8 complementing the 283.
The ante was upped the following year.
For 1967, a lot of new components found their way onto the C-10. While in retrospect some of these are almost laughably simple, such as a dual reservoir master cylinder and a padded dashboard, this was a huge step forward. This all new body helped pull Chevrolet pickups into a more modern era of safety and drivability. Chevrolet was even touting having an all steel bed floor for the first time – although a wood floor was still available.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rliIvMwvHqE
The difference between the new 1967 models and the old 1966 models was almost as shocking as country legend Tammy Wynette singing a dance song in 1991. It was a vastly different presentation while still possessing the familiarity of the proven, Chevrolet voice.
Chevrolet’s introduction of these pickups coincided with Ford also releasing a brand new pickup. The pickup wars of today are nothing new as they have been going on for decades. Perusing brochures for both brands also shows the typical sales propaganda of both, which of course means subtle denigration of the other.
For instance, when Chevrolet redesigned the front of their pickups for 1971, they also went to five-lug wheels (down one from the long-standing six lug wheels) with disc brakes being standard across the line. Conversely, Ford’s 1971 brochure talks about big-truck style drum brakes that require less effort than discs when not equipped with power assist. Hedging their bets, Ford does have nominal mention of disc brakes being available. Chevrolet went all in and was the better for it.
Under the hood, Chevrolet made available a 402 cubic inch (6.6 liter) V8 in 1970 after the 396 being used in 1969; Ford had been offering the 390 for several years, so it seemed like a natural. On the small end, Chevrolet introduced the 307 into the pickup product line for 1968 with Ford following suit with the 302 soon thereafter.
Tit-for-tat and all that. Yet one of the biggest differences that can be discerned between the otherwise identical 1971 and 1972 C-10 lies within the cab. For 1971 the rearview mirror was bolted to the roof of the cab; for 1972 it was glued to the windshield. Those are some pretty heady differences.
So this makes our featured pickup a 1972. Well, at this point it could be a modified 1971, but we’ll call it a 1972. With the rate at which these old Chevrolet pickups are reincarnated this rig could be a delightful combination of both years.
This means I really don’t know if my grandfather Albert’s old C-10 was a 1971 or 1972 as I wasn’t paying attention to such fine details as mirror mounting points at age five. Odds are he would have wanted to space vehicle purchases a couple years apart, as he had also purchased a new 1970 Impala, but he also once replaced both of his vehicles within ten days time. So it could be either way.
His C-10 was definitely used as intended by Chevrolet during the time of his ownership.
My grandfather worked at the cement plant in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, with his commute from south of nearby Scott City being exactly 10.5 miles (which also shows using an empty pickup for commuting duties isn’t a new phenomenon). He always drove his pickup to work because he didn’t want to dirty up the car. From what I can determine the ’72 C-10 was his first new pickup. So while he intended to work it, he was still trying to be careful with it. That didn’t work for long.
Grandpa tells stories about the awful things he and his coworkers did to each other. One was to his cousin-in-law Richard, a devout Catholic. Every Friday every person to be found would dump their bologna wrappers, chicken bones, and other land based meat evidence into a distracted Richard’s lunch bucket. Then, as Grandpa has stated “Richard would get home and Lucy would open his lunch bucket. She chewed his ass out every Friday as he never could convince her he hadn’t eaten all the stuff she found. He finally got wise and dumped all the trash before he left work. Then Lucy chewed his ass out for trying to hide his activities from her.”
This is the same Lucy who was sobbing onto my grandfather’s shoulder at my grandmother Violet’s funeral early last year. To get rid of her, Grandpa (then 93) claimed a need to answer Mother Nature. He lied, she left, he was happy. He’s 95 now and still more mentally sharp than many people half his age. Richard and Lucy are around Grandpa’s age and are still living in their home, unassisted. I’ve lost count of the number of people in my extended family who are over age 90. Of the bunch, Grandpa is the only one in assisted living and that’s by his choice.
I digress.
Anyway, a few days after Grandpa purchased his C-10, a bored and mean-spirited coworker drove a loader to the quarry side of the cement plant and got a bucket full of small, washed rock. He then loaded the back of that C-10 to where the rock was level with the sides of the bed.
As Grandpa once said “I’d like to know who the bastard was that did such a thing while I pulled a double shift. It was 12 hours before I had to be back to work and not wanting to blow the tires I drove home at 20 miles per hour. Once I got home I jacked up the rear end before going to bed. Then I had to unload the mess before going to work. Well, the driveway was needing some gravel.”
There was another event in which details are sketchy and lips are still sealed but his C-10 played a crucial supporting role. In fact, it seems to be one of the more taboo subjects in the family which makes it that much more tempting for discussion.
My mom’s younger brother Ron turned thirteen in late 1971. At some point around that time my grandparents uncharacteristically bought a pony for Ron. Given Grandpa’s philosophy of life by the mid-1980s would be “I don’t want anything that eats, sleeps, or poops – except your Grandma” this was quite a remarkable event. However, this wasn’t just any pony. This pony had been used in the sporadically popular industry of donkey basketball and was trained to stop suddenly about every fifteen steps.
I’ve never determined how they succeeded in acquiring such an animal nor have I determined why a pony was used in donkey basketball. But it appears such was the case.
At any rate, it seems this pony was either profoundly dumb or quite suicidal as one day the unthinkable happened. The pony decided to walk across the pond and, of course, he didn’t make it – perhaps he was fifteen steps in. He was discovered floating aimlessly around the middle of the pond. Extrication from the pond involved a jon-boat, a tow rope, and staying away from Grandpa. Some parts of the story have been cleansed and greatly abridged over time, much to my chagrin.
Once the pony was out of the pond it was loaded into the bed of the C-10. Of course, how one just loads a dead, wet pony, after pulling him up a hellacious hill from the pond toward the house has never been answered. I’m suspecting a neighbor’s tractor was involved.
Soggy Pony needed to be disposed of in some fashion. My educated guess is it involved a gully on or near some family property about five miles away. Unloading likely involved dropping the tailgate, nailing the throttle in reverse, and standing on the brakes to achieve a sudden stop at the precipice of the gully. It’s as good a guess as any knowing my grandfather as I do. Even if Soggy Pony was disposed of in another fashion, I have little doubt the C-10 was involved.
And for hauling Soggy Pony to its final resting place, this C-10 would be a great and stylish tool for doing so. It was also a great and stylish conveyance for hauling sail boat fuel during a commute plus hauling any number of other things.
That C-10 hung around until 1979. But being a Chevrolet of this generation there is little doubt, as Johnny Cash sang, it would live to be around again, and again, and again, and again.
Found May 2013 in Hannibal, Missouri
Related Reading:
1972 Chevrolet C-30 by PN
You do realize the phrase “Soggy Pony” is going to be stuck in my head for the rest of the day, right?
While I would normally agree that “Soggy Pony” is the key phrase here ( I think it is the capitalization that really makes it work), I’m pretty sure that “land based meat evidence” is the one I’ll be trying to work into a conversation later on.
..exactly what I was about to type. This stuff is pure gold, isn’t it?
“Soggy Pony” is right up there with “donkey basketball”. A trend that bypassed California, as far as I can recall. nkw these trucks in the other hand, were everywhere and still quite a few on the road. So much more modern than their predecessors, especially after ‘71 when they got disk brakes, and proudly proclaimed that fact on the tailgate. Perhaps so one wouldn’t follow too close if you were driving a drum-braked Ford.
Glad I could be of service with that!
What a great story! And you are right, this generation of Chevrolet has gotten more successive lives from more owners than any other I can imagine. Even now these things are still occasionally seen, both as old rusty working trucks or as shiny playthings with throbbing 350s and rally wheels.
I am with you, these were really nice trucks. A 72 Chevy bought new by a friend of the family sticks in my mind. He owned a paint and drywall business and his regular car was either an Olds 98 or a Cadillac. He bought a new 72 Chevy pickup that was the nicest one I had ever seen up to that time, top end with some woodgrain trim and – air conditioning. Gasp. Hell, many new cars still didn’t have air in northern Indiana at that time.
“The soggy pony” sounds like it could be the name of a dance or a tavern. Maybe both. And I am glad to have inspired you to dredge through your archives. I compliment you on how much nicer your old pictures are than mine.
Thanks. And these old pictures even seem to have aged just like an old Kodachrome print – some of the colors look a little softened from real life.
The ’71/’72 Chevrolet pickup I’ve been holding out for is a green 3/4 ton that is still being used locally. It has aged to a rugged perfection. Problem is I’ve never seen it parked and only while I’m driving. That’s a little problematic for getting good pictures.
Looking back, my grandfather’s red C-10 mentioned it here had it all over the ’79 that replaced it in terms of appeal and, especially, build quality. This generation is the one Chevrolet pickup I’d love to have in the driveway.
These are good looking nice trucks. As a kid, my friend’s father had one, I rode in it several times.
I saw a nice one for sale 2 years ago, a six with three on the tree. Drove nicely enough, but the gas fumes gave me a headache.
The fuel tank is behind the seat…. Not a good place.
Obviously something was wrong, since I didn’t get headache from my friends truck, but the gas tank really soured me on these trucks, which look great, have coil springs in back, and with their bigger, lower more accessible beds, are more useful than today’s trucks,
The combination of truck and songs makes me think of this one from Paul Balze’s Splattergraphics Flickr stream;
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. GM trucks of this era are vehicles, Fords are implements. One is more suited to everyday driving at the possible expense of toughness (i.e. IFS on the Chevy)
while the other is wooly handling beast of burden that just begs
to be worked to death.
Very nice truck. Now that Grumpy Cat has passed on maybe Soggy Pony can have his day in the sun? Or maybe not, since he’s passed as well.
Of course the ultimate country song is You Never Call Me By My Name by Steve Goodman/David Allen Coe. I heard it for the first time while driving through Missouri and had to pull over because I was laughing so hard 🙂
Yep, the funniest country song.
If you enjoy that one, you’ll have to dive into the David Allen Coe back catalog. There’s a reason that you don’t hear his songs on the radio. Funny stuff!
For whatever reason, I had never heard that DAC song until a few minutes ago. It’s a good one, particularly the one verse.
Glad you liked “Soggy Pony”. It was “Kamikaze Pony” until the last minute.
As sometimes happens with stories from several contributes, you could almost swap the truck for a piano and it would be great anyway.
Those of us who have been lucky enough to enjoy our elders, them being old and we being mature enough, are privileged.
Nothing moves me as much as remembering my grandparents and their tales.
Great story, Jason.
As we Jews traditionally say, may you have him until he’s 120, sound and sharp.
Thank you.
I have pictures of the house my grandparents were in for 57 years. We’ve never covered a house here (too often, anyway) and while tempted to write about it, its sale is a bit too fresh for me. But that house is a gold mine of stories that need to be told.
If I had a choice between an early 70s C10 and a F-100 where rust, price and the engine weren’t a consideration (preferably both would have the big 292 or 300 Six and a three on the tree, although a 307 or 302 would work also) I would chose the Chevy/GMC for the ride and the front suspension that’s easier on tire wear
I wouldn’t want the 350. Friends in high school with C-10s equipped with 350s regularly reported getting 9-10mpg with them
My grandfather once told me this particular C-10 almost had a very short life with him. Upon purchase it was getting horrible, single digit fuel mileage. A trip to the dealer, along with an exchange of philosophies, prompted the same pickup that suddenly got much better fuel mileage.
They must have set the carb and ignition timing/advance to specs that they knew worked better than the factory ones.
Chevrolet and GMC have been struggling for sales relative to the competition. Perhaps they might consider a return to making vehicles of this type which are much more practical for actual use as a pickup then the jacked-up macho mobiles of today. Certainly they would lose those customers who purchased based upon emotional needs, but they might retrieve those to whom actual utility was most important.
The 2019 GM pickup is IMHO the ’59 Caddy of it’s time. Where the meme just got more and more out of hand until it jumped the shark. I hope and pray that rationality soon returns to not only truck design, but vehicles in general. Please, no more tortured sheet metal. It’s happened before. Look at a ’59 Ford or Chevy or Caddy, even, vs a ’65.
Say it ain’t so! Here’s one spotted last week-end, MSRP of $93k +13% HST, pony optional.
I could buy two houses for that. No way
Does that market ever buy new, though? You can still get a base model RCLB work truck. Nobody took them away.
In my mind, the ’67 Chevy was the first move towards “civilization” of pickup trucks. I believe the independent front suspension (2WD) was cribbed from, if not outright stolen, from the full-size passenger car line. Also, the C-10 introduced the coil-sprung, four-link rear suspension – a derivative of which is still used in NASCAR today, and the modern RAM uses a similar setup.
Sure, grandpa *could* drive his ’66 to the plant every day, but the ’67 made it so much nicer as a daily driver.
The truck IFS has nothing to do with the car suspension.
The rear suspension is not a 4 link it is sort of a swing arm system with only 2 links from the factory and it was a carry over from the 60-66 trucks. It is now referred to as a “Truck Arm” suspension in NASCAR and other circles. Though you will find them with a Panhard bar today making them a 3 link of sorts.
Oh. It’s not uncommon that I’m way off base. Sorry.
The 67-72 really just refined the design that was used by the previous generation.The basic chassis and suspension design for these trucks was first used in 1963. The Chevrolet trucks for 1960-62 also used independent suspension and coil spring rear suspension, but used a more robust frame.
The full history was covered here:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/automotive-history-1960-66-chevrolet-pick-up-trucks-the-first-modern-pick-up/
Rear suspension came with Panhard rod. They sometimes fell off.
My ’71 had the bushings gone from the Panhard rod. You could grab the bed side and move the bed a couple of inches side to side with a clunk until I replaced the bushings. That rear suspension setup made a much better off roader of a 2WD truck than leaf springs.
Admittedly I’m not as familiar with the intricacies of engine details on Chevy small-blocks as I am with other motors, but I have never seen that particular exhaust manifold (which resembles Hooker’s current cast-iron manifold) as shown in the 1971 powertrain pages on any other Bowtie motor I can recall. Anyone know about this? I know this is esoteric but hey, we’re CC! 🙂
That is a Big Block in that brochure, so that is why the exhaust manifold looks different than found on the small blocks.
You are correct in my opinion that this is the best looking GM truck era. They make the Ford look like a Soggy Pony.
When I was a young teen our neighbor had one, that was my first exposure to one, a blue and white GMC in that case. Been a fan since then.
For several years my father had a ’70 F-100 while my grandfather had the C-10. I greatly preferred the C-10 as it was just a richer experience despite both being rather spartan.
My cousin was the drummer for Soggy Pony, on their first three EPs (the bad ones).
I love these trucks, and the K5 Blazer of the same vintage. That massive eggcrate grille, single headlights, and bumper-mounted turn signals is a brilliant visual.
My father had a red 1972 C-20(slightly tougher) from around 1977 to 1985 that looked almost exactly like this one. It’s the vehicle I learned how to drive in, so of course it’s got a special place in my heart. All of these trucks do, really, because as I was growing up, a lot of people in SLC seemed to favor these instead of the newer models. They were amazing trucks and I wish I was able to own one.
And in case you want details, 350 V8 with a(not sure if it was original) THM-350 automatic. At least from what I remember.
These are still common out here in rust free land and some are still work trucks. I like the look of these better than the more baroque mid 60s trucks. A college room mate had a 69 in blue and white with the 250 6 and it looked lost in the engine bay designed for a big block. My recollection is that he had a 3 speed with a Hurst floor shift and some fresh shotgun damage to the tailgate. I’d daily one of these but I prefer the square body Fords from the 80s which share the angular styling of these Chevys in a more modern package.
A nice honest-to-goodness pickup. This really makes me miss when pickups were true work trucks and not over-blinged up luxo barges of the modern era bought by people who rarely utilize their capability.
It’s almost a law of the Internet at this point: show a nice older truck, and someone will inevitably bring up how terrible new ones are.
’67-’72 is my all-time favorite generation of Chevy trucks. Always good to see one here on CC.
I realize I’m late to this, but Jason, sitting on these pics allowed you to do this truck justice today. Great piece.
And I was hoping from the moment I read the title of this piece this morning that you were making reference to The KLF and Tammy Wynette. Well done.
Thank you, kind sir.
It wasn’t an intentional inclusion but a great opportunity presented itself. One should not waste such opportunities!
Nice photos and great story Jason. That truck is priced quite well. This generation of Chevrolet has been getting top dollar for a long time around here. They quickly became desirable, even when they were just old used trucks.
These Chevrolets are among my favorite trucks. When I was growing up, Dad wanted to buy one of these trucks. He wanted a short box, six cylinder and three on the tree. I remember looking at a few with him, but he didn’t find one that was in good enough shape or that was priced fairly. In the end he ended up with almost the exact opposite, a ’79 Ford F-150 with an 8-foot box and a 460. He didn’t want a monster gas guzzler truck, which the Ford was, but it was my Uncle’s truck and the price was too good to pass up (it also came with a boat, motor and trailer). Dad cursed that truck due it’s piggish appetite for fuel, but I loved it. And these dentside Fords also are at the top of my truck list along side the 67-72 Chevy’s.
My ’71 was the short bed Fleetside basic C10 with no options, radio block-off plate, no spare tire or rear bumper. It was my first pickup and purchased used. Avocado green with the 250ci six and full-sychro Saginaw three speed. Front disc brakes were non-power, along with the steering. The six got tired and I swapped in a 283ci V8, salvaged out of a friend’s ’64 C20. Gas mileage strangely went up with the swap.
I almost bought one back about 1978, until I was a witness to a bad wreck where a woman driving one, with the gas tank behind the seat was trapped in the truck, totally soaked in gas, begging us (The bystanders/witnesses) to “Pull me out the window, I don’t care about my back, please don’t let me burn, don’t let me burn!”, as smoke started coming out from under the hood. The cops pulled up just about as we were going to yank her out and the FD came right behind them and they kept the truck from burning up. The drunk woman who hit her was uninjured, of course. The woman in the truck had a crushed pelvis and a broken left arm and leg. The truck I almost bought was a friend’s grandfather’s who had recently died at 96 and had just stopped driving a couple of weeks before he died due to a fall. I passed on it, but I saw that truck almost daily until early ’82, when I moved out of Vegas.
6K wow thats cheap these old utes command big coin over here especially in good condition the hotrod fraternity love them, while there are a few well beaten hard worked old US pickups around most of them never actually even get dirty thats left to later models and the Aisian models we are over run with.
IMHO, the best truck GM has ever built or likely ever will. The related K5 of this vintage is a standard bearer for everything a sports utility vehicle should be.
You rarely see these in a solid color (usually these are tutone with medium blue or harvest gold paired with white) but it really works. No matter how many times I see those rally wheels with the trim rings and proper caps wrapped in RWLs, it NEVER gets old and has a timeless look.
My uncle was a grave digger and made a lot of money working in old cemeteries where a back hoe couldn’t go. He dug graves by hand. Naturally, he was a lean muscle machine that did nothing fancy. He smoked a pipe. He bought a new 1970 Chevy truck in that deep green we saw tooling around our National Forests, filled with park rangers.
So not only do I love these beautiful trucks for their perfect styling, I associate them with outdoor men doing hard labor. Trucks of this era weren’t for fatties with their runs to Whole Foods. They were vehicles for work, lunch boxes, work clothes, cigarettes and Old Milwaukee.
I miss those days when men without even a high school diploma, could still raise a family on what they earned busting their hump. I love these trucks!
Today’s trucks look like tubbies wearing Nike and Under Armour clothes. They only work out they see are trips upstairs when their Dominoes pizza arrives.
Never mind how much more powerful, cleaner-burning, fuel-efficient, and comfortable they are…