(originally posted 9/24/2011) Hello, fellow Curbside Classic fans. You may have seen my comments as “73ImpCapn,” and I’m here to present my car and a little about myself. I know that convention is to talk about the car first, I’m going to go at this backwards. Why should be clear in a moment.
My name is Alan Petrillo, and 20 years ago (!) I started studying industrial design at Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh. I got my degree, but as with many folks in my class, my career wandered off a bit. I’ve since gotten a degree in political science and I’m now the staff writer at a non-profit “social investing” firm. Another time I can explain what “social” means in that context. All that matters here – and yes, I’m getting to the car – is that adding “social” means that we’re talking about people, and the effects that investing (or design) has on people.
So this is a social design story. Another time I’ll be happy to wear my designer hat and talk about my car’s fenderline and bloodlines. Today, indulge me a little on my own bloodlines, which are tied up with my car’s. I was also born in 1973, you see, and most of what she means to me happened before I found her 20 years ago.
A child of the ‘70s sees the era differently than someone like Paul, who was a free-spirited young adult at the time. I was a little kid in footie pajamas. What’s an era? What’s a decade? This is the world, I would have said (if I could have at that young age). The world to me at that time had no future or past that I could see.
Some of my earliest memories are of my family’s cars, and the sensations of riding in them. Some of the first facts I learned were automotive, like that there were two kinds of cars in the world:
1) Cars
2) Volkswagens
My Mom’s orange VW wagon was noisy and smelly, and the seats were made of rubber that left prints on your thighs. Cars – every other one I can remember – were big, soft, cozy and quiet, and their engines made no sound. What I thought (at the time) was the motor noise was, of course, just the mild whoosh of a gently-driven Torque-Flite. Now I can look back and say that Dad had a ’76 Fury coupe, Grampa had a ’75 Gran Fury 4-door hardtop, and Aunt Pat had a ’74 Imperial coupe. All I knew then was that I loved being in any of them.
Some wild tales of the ‘70s involve sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. Mine have nothing but the fact that neither I nor my cousins ever wore a seat belt. We bounced around on the vinyl and velour and Soft Corinthian Leather. If it was just Mom and Dad in the ‘76, with me in the back seat, I would lean on the front armrest to talk to them. A perfect position to launch the only son through the windshield, but somehow I survived my wild child days.
In the movie “Boogie Nights,” the ‘70s end at a great party that turns monstrous. In my memory, they ended in a swirl of scary words on the evening news. My first realization that the outside world existed involved “inflation” and “Iran” and “hostages” and “OPEC.” My parents and their friends all complained about gas prices that may yet reach one dollar a gallon! I remember asking my Dad if, to save energy, I should stop running my Lionel trains. He reassured me that I was still entitled to my 12 volts of conspicuous consumption.
The atmosphere I’m describing sounds scary, but at the time I was reassured by the sense that grownups were Doing Something about the world’s problems. My Dad, having left his job with Chrysler Leasing (which is where all those cushy cruisers had come from), was at a new employer with a new company car: a 1980 Buick Skylark “X-car.” Yes, by then I started to learn terms like “X-car”; I know the products didn’t turn out so well, but the name still sounds bright and positive to me.
The rest of life started to show evidence of people Doing Something. We all started wearing seatbelts, and everyone quit smoking. The hostages were released, there was a new President, and here my personal newsreel starts to look the same as everyone else’s. The early ‘80s were an earnest effort to clean up after the party-gone-wrong. As I learned more scary words, like “Watergate” and “Vietnam,” I also believed the adults who swore we’d learned from our mistakes. Dad traded his John Dean plastic eyeglass frames for Iacocca wires, and now we all drove K-cars.
So why the hell did I buy a 1973 Imperial when I was 17?
I think the answer is tied up with the atavism of adolescence. Atavism is a primal urge to return to an earlier stage of development. No, I didn’t want footie pajamas, I just felt like I had no place in my boring Maine ’80s high school. I didn’t like the sound of Janet Jackson OR Iron Maiden, and I didn’t think any of the girls, preppie or “mall rat,” would ever notice me.
So this is why the ‘70s came back. For teenage Gen Xers like me, it looked like more fun. It also appealed to the ancient adolescent urge to be contrary. You want me to wear bright fashionable clothes and spike my hair? I’m raiding my Dad’s closet for corduroy blazers and army pants and letting my mop reach Travolta proportions. You want me to “Want My MTV”? I’m looking for The Who on vinyl, not to mention those old Playboys where the women had long hair and curves.
I’m driving a Plymouth Horizon? Like hell I am.
Sophomore year, my soon-to-be Car Buddy Zach turned to me in French class and said, “Is a 440 Road Runner a good car?” That one turned out to be junk, but the question drew us into a world of whatever V-8-powered anything he could afford. (I was saddled with that perfectly good Horizon and no room in the garage, where Dad was restoring a Healey 3000.) So most of my reckless vehicular behavior happened in CBZ‘s GM products: a ’74 Cutlass, a ’78 Omega, and a ’71 Catalina that we would take cross-country after college.
And then I found her, down by the docks on Commercial Street in Portland. I slammed my Horizon into reverse, pulled up and got out and leaned against that high, solid front fender. That was it. This was on a Saturday night. By Tuesday, I had borrowed more than a grand from friends who either believed me when I said I’d sell it at a profit before college, or didn’t care as long as I’d drive them around.
I took the car to Bothel the mechanic, who told me that when I pulled into the lot his first thought was: “Uh oh.” But he got her up in the air, poked around and patiently explained what he was looking for. He didn’t find anything, and put that in writing so I had something to wave at Dad…who took mercy on his foolish son and helped me pay my friends back.
My social design history ends here, right at the beginning. My Imp winters in a drafty barn up in Maine, which isn’t very CC of me, but mild Eugene is a long way from here. She comes out for summers, and Car Buddy Zach drove her for my wedding. A few years later I chauffeured CBZ and the new Mrs. CBZ at theirs. We each have a couple of kids.
This July, when Dad brought the car down to Massachusetts, he also happened to be returning my 10-year-old son. That night they had gone to a cruise night at a diner and traveled after dark. Dad said my boy dozed off right away, slumped over that double-wide leather armrest in the back. Another generation’s dreams ride a big fine Chrysler, and this time, wearing a seatbelt.
Alan Petrillo’s Design Analysis of the 1972-1973 Imperial is here
I LOVE your car. It is simply gorgeous. I think that these are my very favorite fuselage Mopars.
I have always wondered how Chrysler got this front end compliant with the 5 mph bumper standard. Lincolns (and everything else made by Ford) got ruined with the huge, massive front bumpers in 1973. But the 73 Imp looked virtually like the 72 in the front, with the addition of the rubber bumper guards.
It s also quite a story that you have owned the car for such a long time. Not many of us have the sense (or ability) to do that with a special car from our youths.
The 1973 model-year Federal five-mph bumper standard specified a collision into a flat barrier. Chrysler’s rubber bumper guards, with a slight strengthening of the bumper structure behind, fulfilled the Federal requirement. In 1974 the new standards required hydraulic shock mounts and their requisite “stroke” distance.
I just love these cars, they are the highest form of sled-dom ever attained in the Sled Era.
When I was a little kid, a friend’s dad had one of these. I remember being enthralled with the ribbon speedometer that had its pivot from the top rather than the bottom. That and the dash seemed to be very high quality compared to anything else I had seen to that point. I have not seen many cars with better interior materials than the Chryslers of this era. Even the low level cars were nice inside. Really, they were heads above GM and Ford of the era, at least in interior quality. What got Chrysler of the era was quality control. Some cars were great, others were awful.
First, thanks so much to JP and Paul for being such generous gentlemen – it’s an honor to be here!
As for keeping the car so long, I benefited from a) my Dad’s being an old gearhead and b) his knowing a guy with a big half-empty pole barn. What I pay for winter storage wouldn’t cover a week’s rent on a 1-bedroom in Boston.
On a side note I always felt that in the song “Bad Leroy Brown”, Mr. Brown was missing an Imperial to go with his “custom Continental, he got an Eldorado too…”
Bad a$$ car, Amigo. Big thumbs up. Infact I’m jealous. 🙂
The photo of the hood from the drivers point of view says it all…that was ’70s American metal.
Beautiful car.
Ohhhhhh baby, what a car! I have a soft spot for anything Mopar, and the Forward Look and fuselage Chrysler products are my two favorite design eras. You’ve got the best of the best IMHO.
One of these days I want to have one like yours parked next to a contemporary Town & Country in my garage. Off to buy lottery tickets…
I bought my `88 Casprice Estate for exactly the same reasons; a car I remember so fondly from my childhood.
Thanks for the great read.
What a beauty! And not bad on the writing either. I think you summed up what being a kid in the 70’s was very well, and why I hated the 80′ (still do) with aplomb.
Personally can not imagine anything worse than being a Disco Baby. Bad enough living those years, being fond of them….the horror, the horror.
Indeed, what a beauty, I grew up on Mopars, mostly their bread and butter sedans of the Plymouth Fury variety. 🙂
Although the first Mopar I ever knew was the ’64 Dodge 330 wagon my parents bought brand new and later we had a ’70, or was it a ’71? Fury III 4 door sedan and later my Dad bought at a Gov’t auction a ’75 Gran Fury with the 360 in it and a vinyl top, it was supposedly an undercover police cruiser of some sort.
I had a ’68 base Newport custom in HS and if it weren’t for that, I’d have tried to have kept mine but alas, with only the under dash Airtemp AC unit as the only major option, and it being the base 4 door, not a pillar-less hardtop, it was not worthy of keeping after the rare front disc brakes gave me issues and finding parts were non existent back in 1983 so off to the junkyard it went that summer.
Nice piece and such a lovely car indeed. That summer I junked the Chrysler, I looked at a ’72 Imp, a dark brown 4 door with a broken cruise control stalk and later that same summer, checked out a ’73 Newport 2 door sedan but it was just too big for my needs and ended up getting my sister and her first hubby’s ’74 Nova 4 door that fall. It turned out to be a good choice for a variety of reasons.
One of my favorite cars ever was a 68 Newport Custom sedan. Beige outside, 2 tone green inside. Yeeech. But I loved the 383 and Torqueflite. Mine was factory Airtemp a/c and drum brakes, so parts were not so much of a problem. I owned mine in the mid 90s. It was the only sedan I ever owned that could accommodate 3 kids’ carseats across the back.
In a parallel to your story, I put mine up for sale when a pristine 84 Olds Ninety Eight came my way. I hated to do it, but the Olds was just too nice to turn down. A friend had a son in high school who wanted a “classic car” and the family bought it. I think that either 2 or 3 kids used it. The tranny eventually failed. The family offered to sell it back to me, and I thought hard about it, but I did not have time or money to put into it at the time. I still miss that car.
Very cool there JP on your Newport story.
I know those concave sided Chryslers were not liked by everyone, just like the fuselage bodies weren’t liked by everyone either but I happen to like both.
Yeah, that 383 with Torque-flight auto was a great combo, just glad it was the more pedestrian 2 barrel though, due to me a poor HS student and the early 80’s gas prices!
Mine needed work to bring back into shape but was straight and was owned by an elderly grandmother of good friends of ours and we bought from her when she hung up her license in either ’79 or ’80.
As an aside, would love to contribute a series similar to the series, Cars of a Lifetime and have a submission in the email for a My Curbside Classic that is awaiting Paul’s reply when he’s back from vacation and it’s on my current ride, a 1992 Ford Ranger truck. 🙂
That’s a stunning Imperial! I’ve never seen one of these on the street. Like you, I started becoming aware of things beyond Mom and constantly moving from place to place (Strategic Air Command Brat) in the ’70s – we either owned VWs (’66 Type 1, ’69 Camper, ’70 Ghia, ’80 Rabbit) or Mopars, (’62 Dart, 70 Fury III, ’79 B100 Van). My favorite of them all was the Fury, quiet, sleep inducing and very reliable, I never recall it breaking down.
Distinctive though they were, I always found the nose styling of these Imperials a bit odd…as if someone had grafted the rear of a car onto the front.
While I can’t say I’m a fan of the big-ass front turn-signals, the 1973 was truly the last ‘real’ Imperial in that, although it was getting dangerously close to being just another Chrysler, it still had enough separation from the rest of the line to make it worth buying. The 1974-75 non-fuselage cars were just a repeat of what had been done a decade earlier with the 300 series when that once great marque went from something special to being just another carline.
As to how Chrysler met the 1973 5-mph bumper standard, just adding two, thick, rubber bumper guards was all it took. At the time, the test was with a large, flat beam that contacted the front of the car in one, full-frontal perpindicular strike. The big, rubber bumper guards were the only part of the front bumper that contacted the beam so they absorbed all of the impact. The rest of the chrome front bumper never touched the test beam.
Frankly, I think the federal govt let Chrysler slide on those first couple years until the engineers were able to catch up and truly incoporate the new standard into bumper design. That’s when everything got the ‘cow-catcher’ look.
The same thing happened in 1968 with the new side-marker light mandate. For a year or two, some cars didn’t have actual lights but just reflectors. But by 1970, all cars had actual lights.
Always love the Imperials of this era. It just look so.. majestic. Definitely my favorite 70s cars. And yours looked brand new. Very nice!
I enjoyed the piece and like that big Imperial a lot too. None of my many Mopars was a fuselage model but a good friend had a 1970 Fury III green on green sedan with 318 that he bought from a state auction with just over 100k miles on it; drove it another 100,000 and had no problems with it. I remember how remarkable it seemed to me that this big sedan with only a 318 2-barrel engine had no problems keeping up with freeway traffic, and without his needing to have his foot in it all the time.
I remember how remarkable it seemed to me that this big sedan with only a 318 2-barrel engine had no problems keeping up with freeway traffic, and without his needing to have his foot in it all the time.
It’s called torque, 🙂 once upon a time we didn’t have to rev an engine to 5000+ rpm to find power. Sigh. (forgive my nostolgia, I know that you, pfsm remember what that was like.)
This is why some British and European critics love modern turbodiesel engines. Maybe a smidgen of off-idle boost lag (which with a torque converter automatic you might not even not notice), not a lot of top end, but oceans of low to mid-range torque.
That Interior. How much do you charge to hang out in it?
Nicely written! I’ll join everyone who’s used the word “majestic” to describe your car. It really really is. Congratulations!!! A heck of a job keeping it up (and I know just what it means, having used my 21-year old as a daily driver for almost 3 years now). I furthermore can relate to your winter storage solution, namely – NEEDING one – a big RWD living in the north? Yeah.
Now, I look forward to hearing sometime about these babies in Automotive History… penned by you with all the expertise and knowledge that you have on these cars. Also, it would be great to hear what it takes to keep one running! 😉
Last but not least, I have to say that you also summarized my feelings about why I love my car, which almost like yours, dates to about right after I was born – the production began in 1983/84, I was born in ’82. Except that I didn’t ever get to ride in them as a kid, I saw them on the streets and dreamed of riding in (or, – gulp! – driving) one. And so it seems that to you the Imperial is much more than a car, it epitomizes the best there was about the 70s – your 70s – likewise for me mine represents the late 80s and early 90s when I first truly became cogniscent of the world around me… hair metal, British shoegaze, and the last gasp of new wave music. Like you, I didn’t much care for Iron Maiden, but I sure grew up on those early Poison records and Def Leppard’s Hysteria…
I think to both of us our cars represent the best about their respective eras… and then, only then, they are cars.
Once again, congrats on an incredible toy! I’ll look forward to that automotive history write-up now…
Man, you write nicely, Alan. As much (well, just about) of a rarity as your gorgeous car. Here’s hoping you’ll be able to contribute more!
Don’t like Iron Maiden?…..sheese….Great write up, won’t hold that against you 🙂
+1,we’ll let you off for not liking Iron Maiden but only because it was a good write up and cool car.
That dash is so awesome I almost want to cry. Mopar always had great dashes back then.
Yes! I love the “numbers at the bottom, needle up top” solution – the opposite of a typical period speedo… totally badass.
I just can’t stress this enough, I’d love to hear the story of this car… what it’s been through, what were the big repairs… to me, those are the moments that stay with you as much as the best road trips. 😀
I always liked drum speedometers, though I never owned a car with them. They seem to have gone the way of vinyl roofs, Broughams, and Imperials. Shame.
“Drum” being horizontal ones?
Yep, that’s what I meant. An actual drum speedometer would be like an Edsel or early Toronado. I think the 1991 Caprice was the last new (meaning redesigned) car to have horizontal speedometers. I remember the 1990-92 Cadillac Broughams and early ’90s Buick Centurys had them too.
LeSabre Customs (and some of the Limiteds) had a ribbon cluster through 1996 I think. The small round gauge cluster was an option on Customs.
2nd gen (“aero”) Grand Marquis had it from factory – I just recently spent two weeks riding around in and driving a ’92. The only thing non-stock about that baby was that the owner had thrown in a 5.0 HO to replace the blown 4.6 SOHC 😀 😀 😀
That was/is quite a car.
They actually kept the ribbon cluster through ’99, at least in the Custom. I had a ’97 with it, it was my girlfriend’s (now wife’s) car that she was sick of, and I was sick of making payments on my Rabbit. Since I was still in school and she had a real job, we traded.
Indeed. My 1995 LeSabre Limited has the ribbon cluster.
Nice article, and a beautiful car. I think it’s great you still have the Imperial after all these years. Black with saddle interior is one of my favorite color combos, my dearly departed 1991 Volvo had this color combo. I wish I’d had a place to stash it when I got a new(er) car. I have that ’73 Imperial brochure in my car brochure collection – somewhere! Car brochures were a lot cooler then too, on the ’73 brochure the Imperial eagle was embossed on the cover. A lot of the Lincoln brochures back then were the same way, and had onion-skin pages. Today, just about all brochures have stark photos of silver cars, no imagination.
Great story and a real nice car. I was 15 when you and your car hit the world just got my licence and looking for a car but no Imperials for me those cars were simply not attainable or obtainable I went from a horrible gutless Triumph Herald to a Vauxhall Velox just in time for gas to hit $1.My dad told me my car was capable of 25mpg but I couldnt bring myself to drive that slow. Disco sucked just as badly for those of us that lived thru it thankfully the Rolling Stones were alive and Pink Floyd hit their stride to drown out shit like the BeeGees Loved the drum speedos Vauxhalls had those that changed colour as you progressed, the one in my first PAX broke and I had to dismantle it for repairs, it was remarkably simple inside but looked really cool in use.
+1 I was 16 in October 73,the only licence I could get was for a 50cc moped,not wanting to look like a performing bear I gave it a miss.Disco was crap,I listened to Deep Purple,Led Zeppelin,The Stones,Pink Floyd,Alice Cooper and the Who back then.Although I saw a lot of American cars from the nearby USAF base I don’t ever remember seeing an Imperial at the time.
+2. Was 17, had a drivers license and a 66 Beetle at that time. And all of those bands on 8 track. + Allman Bros ‘Eat a Peach’, T Rex, ELP, and Black Sabbath. AM-FM out of the one dash speaker, and the chrome plated steel under dash Muntz 8 track with 2 speakers mounted in the rear seat side trim panels. Oh, and a ‘Disco Sucks’ license plate frame. Levi’s and flannel shirt rolled partially up.
Wow! I’m just floored by the response, what a great mix of facts and opinions and memories. Reminds me why this is my favorite automotive corner of the web…although some of these comments make me fear a car-jacking. 😉
I promise to write some more, with less “auto-biography” and more car talk. Although I do have some great shots of my Grampa’s gas station from the 20s-50s…I just need to get them off Dad’s wall and scan them.
Thanks for all the kind words,
Alan
Alan:
What makes this review SO compelling is your personal “auto-biography” slant on the story. Thanks for a wonderful review and a great car.
I will be eternally regretful that I didn’t keep the car I owned from my birth year. I am envious of your foresight in this matter.
My best friend in high school’s parents had one of these, and I drove it a few times. I referred to it at the time as “the aircraft carrier” for its flight deck like hood and slow steering. It was especially fun on the highway when you could get it to “dance” by wiggling the steering wheel at the natural frequency of the suspension. One time after a post formal party I had to chuck a very drunk family member from the driver’s seat and do the designated driver thing. Good times.
I just had another look at the pix. I had forgotten about the IP light dimmer control under the brow at the top.
Beautiful! I think your Imp and the 70-71 Fury are the nicest fuselage-era Mopars.
I need to sit down and write a submission for My CC, but I’d have to put a different slant on it or it would sound a lot like yours. 🙂
Most of my adult life, I’ve heard a lot of bad stuff about Chrysler, yet, somehow I’ve always been drawn to the marque. Maybe because my uncle worked at the St. Louis plant for decades, the first car I remember my folks driving was a ’52 Dodge, the beautiful jet-black ’61 they drove some years later, the ’68 Newport they had in the early ’70s or the four Iacoccamobiles I’ve owned.
Your Imperial is what American expressionism is all about: sheer power and good looks.
Nicely done.
Beautiful car, and a beautiful story – thank you! And also being born in 1973, I can relate to your growing awareness of the world stage. Sadly when I was 17, big crusiers were way out of my price league (due to their rarity here in NZ), and fuel was so dear I could never have afforded to run one anyway… So my motoring career began at the opposite end of the spectrum, a 1971 Ford Escort. It would probably have fitted in your Imperial’s trunk. Sigh, if only I was raised in America, land of the really cool big cars…
Like the author of the article and you, NZ, I sprung to life in 1973. And it seems like I’ll never get the ‘bug’ of wanting to own nothing but cars of the ’60s and ’70s out of my system. Even when I was awash in enough $dosh$ to snag a new car (circa 2000/2001) I didn’t want one. I desired an old beastie. So I bought one: a ’67 Lincoln Continental with the suicide doors. Wish I could’ve kept it . . . (sigh).
That ’73 Imperial *impels* one to pay attention to it; I’d love to see one ‘in the wild’ instead of just in pictures. Heck, I wish there were a few more old cars around where I live period. There’s just hardly any around. When I moved to GA in 2008 I’d still see a fair few cars of the ’60s and ’70s on the road. I remember noting a ’65 Chevy would often cross my viewfinder when I’d be motoring around. Also ran across a ’64 Falcon Ranchero, a ’65 Mustang and a ’73 Chrysler (owned by a fellow who repairs watches at a local jewelry shop). Haven’t seen the ’73 in quite a while, but admittedly it was not in good condition before when I’d see it. Needed some engine work among other things.
Great Article and a great car! I soo regret selling my ’72 Imp when gas prices started making it too expensive to drive all the time! But man, I sure loved it! Gonna have to start looking for another one!
Now this is one fine Curbside Classic!!!
Beautiful car, and great story!!! I”m looking forward to reading more from you 🙂
Absolutely stunning Imperial. The upholstery is a work of art, and complements the cars color perfectly. I got a bit of wheel time with these fuselage Chryslers during 1969-72 and remember them fondly. Thanks for this article. It made my morning.
Wonderful story! I chuckled at your memory of being seat belt-less and leaning up on the armrest to talk to your folks. I did exactly the same thing in our 1970 Chrysler 300 sedan as a kid, sliding around the expansive black vinyl interior. It was HUGE inside — I think the back seat was as roomy as a Cadillac Fleetwood. I loved that car although I was envious of the much fancier Buick Electras and Olds 98s we pulled in next to at our church parking lot. If we’d had an Imperial I don’t think I would have felt any envy!
A bit later, I kept on leaning on the back of the front seat when we replaced that huge Chrysler with a downsized ’78 Caprice.
Seat belt-less didn’t happen for me. I was an only child born to older parents. Before belts were available, Dad would tie a length of rope across my lap from one armrest to the other, “just to keep you in place and stop the doors from flying open in a crash.” That was in an old Morris Oxford. As soon as belts became available, he installed one centre rear in the old Falcon he had by then – and worried whenever I rode in a car without belts.
Great piece, Alan. Just great.
Since the Chevy dealer owed my father big time, every year we got free his choice of what was left on the lot at the end of the model year. I buried myself in the back seat in the vain hope no one in our town of 3000 would recognise me. Besides the priest and the funeral director, we were the only people driving black.
The first car I fell in love with was the ’60 (?) Corvette in ‘Route 66’. Come to think of it, I still am.
Awesome ride, great story to go with it.
For some reason, this car makes me think of the Chi-Lites singing “Stoned Out of my Mind”. How wonderfully, cheerfully baroque this car was.
Great writeup of a great car!
I like some of the “Extra Care in Engineering” features in these cars. In some ways they were quite advanced for their time with things like Electronic ignition, available ABS brakes, full instrumentation, unibody construction, etc.
It was a sad day when they dropped the Imperial name after this series.
Yours is a fine examply of Luxury at its finest in 70s Americana… The kind I like bEst.
I would prefer my leather in Burgundy or Red. But Oh my what a Beaut she is.
I greatly enjoyed the article.When I was a boy I wascrazy about Cadillacs and was privildged to ride in a 58,59,62,63,64,65,68,69,but I always was fascinated by Chrysler Imperials.The unique name said it all.They had class,but were also ‘bad asses’.I had a few diecast ones,and built one as a plastic model kit.The model line up was Southhamton,Crown and Lebaron.(Formely a body builder ala Fleewood for Cadillac).What a beautiful car your 73 is.Power,comfort,image.It could hold its own against ANY luxury car built in the world!
The Southhampton in America is obviously a very different place to the hellhole on England’s south coast!
My late dad was a Mopar guy for years. He had a new Dodge every year from 1955 to 1965. He then stepped up to a 66 Chrysler Windsor, then a 68 Newport Custom (with an awesome hipo 383 – 335 hp and 425 ft lbs of torque – (I just LOVED that car!!) then a 70 Monaco 500 coupe. Then came the beauty – a 1973 Imperial LeBaron coupe, blue with a white vinyl top. Although under powered with the 215 hp 440 it was still a beauty to drive. I have fond memories of that car as it was the year I got my license. I have never wavered from being a Mopar guy and still am to this day.
Hey! – I live in Portland and have a ’71 LeBaron Coupe! The Pimperial, Sgt. Few-So-Large or Cargantuan is it’s name, depending on it’s mood.
Nice float you got there!
Ha! I think I may have seen a pic of your bomber on another site. Certainly never run into you around town! Where’d you get those wide whites?
Nice to be reminded of old car season as yet another foot of @$@# falls on us.
I think someone informed me about another Mighty Imp sighting around town. Must have been you. Surprised we haven’t bumped into each other. Literally…because the streets are too narrow for the both of us!
The wide-whites came from Coker for waaaay to much money.
More snow??? It’s got Sure-Grip 😉
You should stop in at my SoPo body shop sometime!
Edit; wait, this car is black or dark blue???
If it’s black, then I remember seeing it either a little before – or after you bought it. That was probably 20 years ago. I think I know this car!
Shoulda saved some scratch for wheel covers. 🙂
Say brother, send your email to the CC contact above, and ask the admins to pass it on to me. My car is black, bought in ’91 and I worked at Smaha’s back in the day – maybe you saw it parked around there?
Forgot where Smaha’s was/is, but there was a couple around. Well one was a New Yorker I think. One was in Gorham for sale and another was in Scarboro, a roomate of Mike Capozza’s.
All I can think of is the lyrics to the B-52’s song “We hop in my Chrysler its as big as a whale and its about to set sail!”
Makes my 81 Imperial positively small by comparison.
But it does wear black well. The car appears to be leather, it would have been even more interesting if it had had IRAQ CLOTH.
I have always loved this car, and almost bought one myself in my late 20’s… same colour inside and out, but in terrible shape (the only kind I could afford!) My 2nd fave car is the next generation 1974 Imperial, waterfall grille and all. My dad had a 73 newport, mom had a 76 newport, and I had a 78 newport. Uncle Ed had a 72 Imperial, and then a 75 Imperial… Chrysler was the only manucfaturer to integrate the crash bumpers to look beautiful… GM & Ford looked like badly chromed shoe boxes stuck end to end on the front and back with miles of rubber filing the gap. Yuck.
Unfortunately, after the 1974/8 model year, Chrysler never made another good-looking car again. Mind you, neither did anyone else…
was the 73 Imp as quiet riding as the Cadillac and Lincoln? I know the New Yorker was never as quiet in tests as the competition (eg Electra 225 and Marquis) but the Imp is even heavier than the New Yorker and contains more sound proofing. even if it wasn’t quite as quiet inside, do you think it would still be given a rating of “quiet” vs “fairly quiet”?
Chryslers, and The Imperials, were never as quiet and smooth as the Lincolns and Caddy’s… but that’s because they handled better. The UniBody and Torsion suspension made it tighter and hence not quite as quiet, but they were still more than ‘fairly quiet’ and drove much better. I took a corner at speed in a Sedan DeVille, and almost lost it in the gravel shoulder, I took the same corner in a Town Car and I couldn’t feel that I was off the road it was so smooth, but I was in the weeds. The same corner in the New Yorker at 20mph faster and it put me exactly where I wanted to be with no sweat and without sloshing the coffee. The ’73 Imperial I test drove- as beat as it was- took the ramps of the NYS Thruway like a race-car at 70 and never listed a degree or two!
I agree–you hit this right on target.
Good question. The handling is sharper than you might expect and the brakes are quite good. Mine could use some help in the back as the tired leaf springs allow too much lateral movement. I don’t find it all that quiet, but that’s mostly due to wind leaks around the aging hardtop seals. The big unibody [plus front subframe] does tend to amplify bump noise, again, mostly from the back. I think the ’74-up c-bodies crammed a lot of stuffing into those hollow spaces.
im guessing the Imp averaged between 7-16 mpg for normal driving and about 12 mpg on a long trip. am i accurate?
I got a 1973 imperial labaron at an auction. Everybody laughed when I bought it because I was drinking having fun. We’ll I love it and parked my 2015 dodge and driving the 73
Incredible car. These cars were always pretty scarce. My first real recognition of one was entering the Chicago area on a family Thanksgiving trip around 1975. The sleek long black car gliding in the freeway lane next to us in the dark, the Imperial lettering down the rear quarter, followed by that cool shield side marker light, the vertical tail lights that usually mean a luxury car – very impressive to 11 year old me in our ’68 Impala. Within minutes, a 1970 Electra 225 with similarly positioned lettering followed by a cool round side marker made an equal impression. If only I could be in one of those cars!
The design esthetic is really quite anti-brougham. The exterior is sleek, simple. The interior is much more spare than a typical Cadillac from the era, and lacks some of the more egregious brougham touches like fake sculpted wood that wouldn’t fool a blind man with no sense of touch.
Well said, Dave. 🙂
For the most part, I’d sooner forget the 1970’s and large cars from that decade. But at one point I owned a ’77 Plymouth Fury Salon (the B body?), and this turned out to be one of the best cars I’ve ever had. One of the last fuselage bodies. So I have a soft spot for any fuselage bodied Mopar, and your car embodies all the best attributes of the type. Clean flanks, loop bumper and hidden headlights, minimal detailing, rich interior. It exudes class and style, not the blingy excess in vogue today. May you enjoy it for many more years.
With all the music references, I’m surprised there was no mention of Little Anthony and the Imperials. Or am I aging myself? And speaking of age, I do envy you young folks who can buy cars from the year of your birth. There was some cool stuff being cranked out the year I was born, the last of the tri-5 Chevies and the last of the 300SL Gullwings, plus some nice trucks, but not much that I’d want to own AND could afford.
Loved the front and rear styling, wished management allotted some funds for unique side styling to differentiate it from the other Chryslers.
The 1st time I saw one of these on the street I thought it was a Cadillac….and that would have been a compliment 40 years.
I am not a fan of (overly/un-necessarily) large cars, but this is a very good looking car…even today.
This is my favorite Imperial. I never saw one in the metal but I saw it profiled in Hemmings Classic Car magazine. The lines are clean and sharp, the proportions are perfect. The whole car is a piece of modern art.
+1
Great feature, impressive car. Recent posts on Imperial models have given me great insight on the cars and a new respect for them.
It was nice to re-read this again Alan. I love these cars, and it’s nice to know that a local owns and cares for one.
Hey Brendan – shoot me an email c/o Paul or Tom, and I’ll take you for a spin next spring!
Take me, too! Heck, I’d pay you to! 🙂
As Bob Hope would have said, “Thanks for the Memories.” While I had no Imperials, I had Mopars of the era. I second those who applaud the ’68 Newport, as I had one of those. Among the ’70s I owned was a ’72 Polara Custom wagon with the 360. Very nice. I shudder to think of all the cars I’ve had since I got my license in 1955, but there were many. I guess that is why I relate to so many stories here. And, with the others, thank you for sharing your story.
If CC doesn’t stop posting articles about fuselage Chryslers you are going to cause me great difficulties at home when I show up in one. I may well end up having to sleep in it; at least there is plenty of room 🙂 Seriously, I love these and this Imperial is an outstanding example of the breed.
Great car…glad that you’ve hung onto it!
They`re calling it “Chrysler Imperial” again, but this time around, Mopars own advertising agency is doing it. I thought the “Chrysler” Imperial controversy was put to bed in the `59 Imperial article last week.
absolutely loved the cushioned style leather interior on the 1970’s Imperial’s and New Yorker’s, I’m not a huge fan of the vehicles built in 1973 and later but the Imperial and the Lincoln Continental are my Top 2 favorite luxury cars of 1973, the 5mph bumpers don’t seem to affect the front end styling too much on the Imperial’s of this year like it did in many vehicles built in this time frame.
US readers will probably be unfamiliar with the other “Chrysler” Imperial – the Humber Imperial, built by Rootes UK between 1964 (when Chrysler bought a significant share in Rootes) and 1967, when all the pre-Arrow saloons were deleted from the by-then Chrysler UK range.
Humber had used the Imperial name before, but is it slightly more than coincidental that it was revived for Rootes’s top-of-the-line vehicle in 1964? Perhaps Roger Carr can enlighten us. Anyway, here’s a photo taken from a Google search – a tarted-up Super Snipe that of course looks nothing like any US Imperial. But if I couldn’t have a Rover P5B Coupe to drive myself, I wouldn’t object to being chauffeured in one of these.
Not seen a Humber Imperial for a long time,it even had a hemi !
Well this is a nice surprise! Suddenly 2011 seems like a long time ago…not to mention 1991.
Great article and a beautiful car. I love it in black; it looks very classy. You just don’t see any these Imperials cruising around anymore- it’s been several years since I remember spotting one in the flesh. They are far less common than other land yachts of their era. Glad to see one that has been cared for and loved by the same owner for so long. Reading this has inspired me to write something about my latest acquisition, a well patina’d C-body wagon I recently saved from the doom of being parted out. I can only hope it looks as nice as this car one day!
Love this car!
I’ve never been much of a Fuselage fan unless it’s the ’73-74 Imperial in black. I don’t recall any other car design that was so transformed by its exterior paint color than this bodystyle. Great write up and beautiful car!
Loved your article. Plenty of great memories there – and no wonder you bought an Imperial!
I’m another car guy who didn’t fit in to his era. My musical tastes were WAY out of line with the other kids (classics and folk. Instant conversation-killer.), but growing up in a poor family in a run-down part of town, buying a car just wasn’t an option, not even in the early seventies. So I rode the trams and trains and walked a lot, and didn’t get my first car until I was 25. Only had three since then. I figure if it’s hard to come by, it’s worth hanging on to.
I’ve only owned 3 cars since I started driving in 1989. A 1964 Ford Falcon (given to me a present in August ’89. Cost my folks $1,750 bucks then and the car had 50,350 miles. Old-lady owned; still have it). Then in Nov. 1998 I inherited a 1986 Ford Thunderbird coupe that had like a gold or copper color. My dad had passed away and it was his car. So I decided to drive it and ‘rest’ the Falcon after 9 years of heavy driving to school and work. I figured my Dad would have wanted to me to keep using it. He liked it. Didn’t last long doing that, however. On January 11, 2000 some peckerwood pulled out in front of me and the T-Bird was totaled. Sheesh.
Then I got a ’67 Lincoln Continental with only 45,000 miles. Eventually had to sell it. I couldn’t drive it enough; I hope its new owner gives it some much-needed traction.
If it’s good enough for Syd Mead, it’s good enough for me. Love my Fuselages and this is a supersupreme example with a great backstory. I’ve read this post a few times over the past year but now its time to share the love.
Its cool to have a car from the year you were born. I had one – my 59 Plymouth Fury. According to the sticker in the glovebox, it was delivered to the original owner on the very day I was born. Should have kept it.
Alan, You have an awesome car! If I ran across an Imperial like this, especially given the color, at a market correct price I would buy it in a minute.
Alan, while I haven’t commented, this is a great looking car in the definitive color. As another long term owner of a car, I’m quite envious that you’ve been able to enjoy it for the duration.
While there are some who argue that the styling wasn’t Chrysler’s finest hour, I don’t think there’s any denying that the ’73 Imperial was the best-looking of the last fuselage Chryslers. The company’s downward spiral really began in earnest the following year and the ‘Extra Care in Engineering’ days would be over, forever.
I’ll drink to that… okay so it’s ’72 not ’73. 🙂
http://www.breckbrew.com/brews/72-imperial
Good Lord, your Imperial is simply magnificent! Never have I seen one in that color scheme, either! Most ’70’s era cars seemed to be finished in either Gross Green or Fecal Brown. Being born in 1971 myself, you summed up perfectly what it was like being a child growing up in that decade. I too found myself at odds with all the preppy/punk-rock/metal-heads that comprised my classmates in the 1980s. What a great article and what a honey of a car. I’m suitably 70’s Green with envy!
Alan, thanks so much for posting all the great pics you have taken of this beautiful car, and for your great storytelling. I was a boy in 1969, when my dad brought home a new, 1970 New Yorker. It was like no other car I’d ever seen, and I was already a car nut. The next summer, our good friends drove from Illinois to see us, riding in their ’71 LeBaron 4 door, and I was hooked on Mopar forever. The car was incredible to a kid like me. I’ve always wanted to at least SEE one of those cars again, not to mention actually drive one, but most have long rusted away. I can’t remember the last time I actually saw any of the ’69-’73 C body Mopars on the road.
The lines of your writing that really hit home for me were:
“So why the hell did I buy a 1973 Imperial when I was 17?
“I think the answer is tied up with the atavism of adolescence. Atavism is a primal urge to return to an earlier stage of development. No, I didn’t want footie pajamas, I just felt like I had no place in my boring Maine ’80s high school. I didn’t like the sound of Janet Jackson OR Iron Maiden, and I didn’t think any of the girls, preppie or ‘mall rat,’ would ever notice me.”
Thanks again–I hope you can keep this beautiful girl around for the rest of your life.
Mike, Omaha, NE
If anyone who lives in Omaha (or Kansas City or Des Moines) has a C body fuselage car they wouldn’t mind me dropping by just to see sometime, please let me know. I cannot find any around here at the car shows I’ve been to.
Hey. I just fou d this article today, 24jul17. Do you still have the car? Selling? Great piece, BTW. Thank you.
Here’s a pic of my restored 73 LeBaron coupe; burnished red with black leather interior. It sold new at Halgren’s Chrysler Plymouth in Vancouver Washington in June of 73 (have the paperwork).
Hey Alan!
Your story has a strong resemblance to buying of my first car, which will be in my full possession next November after I receive my driver`s license.
Greetings from Finland!