(first posted 2/22/2012) Growing up in south-central Pennsylvania, trips to the Gettysburg battlefield were a regular family outing. My father has always been a history buff, which meant that we spent quite a few summer Saturdays touring the battlefield. Among other lessons, it instilled an appreciation of AMC’s repeated use of the name “Rebel”.
A regular stop was the site of Major General George Pickett’s infamous charge. My father would solemnly tell us that this spot represented the High Water Mark of the Confederacy. Over 12,000 Confederate soldiers marched across 3/4 of a mile of open field, right into a heavy barrage of Union artillery fire. The Confederates suffered a 50 percent casualty rate, and General Robert E. Lee’s attempt to threaten both Harrisburg and Philadelphia was stopped in its tracks. From that point on, the question wasn’t whether the Confederacy could win the war, but how long until it surrendered.
America’s independent auto makers were a lot like the Confederacy. They battled much bigger and wealthier foes with a combination of daring and inspired leadership, primarily because they didn’t have much else.
Regular Curbside Classics commentator Dr. Lemming has proclaimed that the 1973-77 Hornet hatchback represented a High Water Mark for American Motors. Given that AMC was the last independent automaker, this car represents the final High Water Mark for the independents.
AMC was looking a lot like the Confederate forces after Pickett’s Charge by the time the Hornet debuted in the fall of 1969. The Hornet replaced the tired Rambler (which had debuted as the Rambler American in 1958, but was simply tagged as “Rambler” for its final year). The Hornet’s debut marked the demise of the old Rambler nameplate, which AMC had been phasing out since the mid-1960s. Chief Executive Officer (CEO) George Romney, who combined messianic zeal with a general’s discipline, drove AMC to third place in total sales by 1961 (or 1960, if Valiant sales are separated from Plymouth sales). Romney, realizing that going head-to-head with the Big Three was a losing battle, placed all of AMC’s chips on the intermediate-size Rambler. He was helped by a combination of the 1957-58 recession, the ballooning size of the Low-Price Three, and the lousy build quality of far too many Big Three cars.
In an exquisite bit of timing that has so far eluded son Mitt, Romney left AMC to run for Michigan’s Governor’s office in early 1962. His replacement was Roy Abernethy, who was determined to match the Big Three model-for-model. AMC was preparing all-new Classics and Ambassadors for 1963, followed by a 1964 American that was to be based on the same platform. The cars were quite handsome on the outside, and boasted new “uniside” construction for better panel fit and durability.
Romney would later criticize Abenethy’s direct attack on the Big Three, but, in reality, he had few options, given that they were invading AMC’s market segments. AMC was thus backed into making its own version of Pickett’s Charge.
And not all of AMC’s problems were Abernethy’s fault. AMC had neglected chassis development, and its engines lagged behind those of the Big Three. The American was still using the ancient Nash flathead six in 1965! That didn’t matter as much when AMC had the intermediate field largely to itself, but by 1965, GM, Ford and Chrysler had invaded the compact and intermediate fields with handsome designs and more modern drivetrains. In the military, business and politics, leaving just before things go sour is an art in and of itself, and Romney’s exit from AMC was a classic example of leaving at just the right time.
AMC fought back with excellent new sixes for 1964, and new V-8s for 1966. Abernethy pushed for larger, fully restyled Classics and Ambassadors for 1965, and planned another generation of all-new, even larger cars for 1967. He also demanded more distinction between the Classic (renamed Rebel for 1967) and Ambassador.
The only problem was that all of that spending on new sheetmetal and engines failed to generate increased sales. The bigger cars and more powerful engines were also erasing AMC’s economy advantage. AMC sales slumped badly for 1966 and 1967, leaving the company on the verge of bankruptcy in early 1967. By 1969, AMC was offering five distinct lines of cars – Ambassador, Rebel, Javelin, AMX and what had been the Rambler American. Their total sales failed to equal the sales of what had been the “standard” Rambler just nine years earlier.
Battle-weary AMC dealers therefore looked at the Hornet the way a beleaguered general looks at a fresh infusion of troops. Riding on a trim 108-inch wheelbase, the Hornet came in two-door and four-door sedans. Having learned its lesson with its 1965 and 1967 cars, AMC made sure that both body styles shared the same roof stampings, and the front and rear bumpers were interchangeable, all to minimize tooling costs.
The engines were standard AMC fare – straight sixes in 199 and 232 cubic inches, or a 304 cubic inch V-8, with the 199 six gone after one year. Styling was the Hornet’s strong point – its Dick Teague-designed flanks were smooth and clean, while the grille and taillights managed to be simple without being boring. The Hornet avoided the contrived “mini-Mustang” look of the Maverick or the plain-jane frumpiness of the Valiant/Dart, making it the best-looking domestic compact of the 1970s.
Hornet received good reviews, but, surprisingly, sales were somewhat of a disappointment. AMC, to its credit, kept trying, and followed up with the handsome Sportabout wagon for 1971, which is still one of the best-looking wagons ever produced. An important mechanical improvement was the replacement of the outdated Borg-Warner automatic with Chrysler’s terrific Torqueflite automatic in 1972 (named Torque-Command by AMC) for all AMC cars, something the company should have done in 1964 or 1965 to better show off its new engines.
AMC’s sales and balance sheet steadily improved after 1971, so by 1973, AMC was ready to add some sex appeal to its compact line. Hatchbacks were all the rage in the early 1970s, so, for 1973, AMC added this handsome one to the Hornet line-up. Car and Driver promptly proclaimed it “the styling coup of 1973,” and the praise was right on target. While GM and Chrysler took a blowtorch and cut a hatch into their standard compact bodies, Dick Teague designed an entirely new roofline and rear quarter panels for the Hornet hatchback. It flowed beautifully on to the neatly bobbed deck. That curse of the Great Brougham Epoch – the vinyl roof – couldn’t completely hide the slick new roof and quarter window.
Even the new-for-1973 bumper standards didn’t ruin the Hornet, as Dick Teague designed a sharp new front fender, hood and grille ensemble that mated perfectly with the rest of the body. This Hornet is a post-1974 model, as it sports the segmented grille and rectangular parking lights adopted for 1975.
Even the details were handled nicely. AMC placed a Hornet medallion on the leading edge of the hood, thus avoiding the stand-up hood ornament craze sweeping the industry while still giving buyers an extra bit of decoration.
The door handles were AMC’s trademark, flush-mounted units that it had used since 1968, which added a nice premium touch to the car, while maintaining a visual link to the rest of the line-up.
Sparked by improving Hornet and Gremlin sales, AMC’s market share increased for 1973, and rose again in 1974, which was a terrible year for the industry. AMC seemed to have recovered from its 1960s mistakes. And then, in two consecutive years, it would repeat them in rapid fashion, ensuring that it would be driven out of business. It introduced the Matador coupe for 1974 and Pacer for 1975, both of which used unique sheetmetal shared with no other AMC car. Neither car generated enough sales to recover their tooling costs, largely due to their oddball styling and uninspired mechanicals.
The hatchback’s impact died almost as quickly, as domestic compact buyers decided they wanted either mini-Continentals or faux-Benzes, and hatchback lovers bought VWs and Hondas.The Hornet soldiered on through 1977, after which AMC surrendered to the Brougham craze and brought out the Concord, which was a Hornet with styling and appointments inspired by a Lincoln Continental Mark IV. The hatchback continued as a Concord through 1979, and even served as the basis for a revived AMX in 1977 and 1978. The Concord, in turn, spawned the all-wheel-drive Eagle in 1980, which was still in production when Chrysler bought AMC from Renault in 1987. The Eagle wagon, still wearing the same basic body of the old Hornet Sportabout, lasted through the 1988 model year, after which it was finally phased out by Chrysler.
One wonders what would have happened to AMC if, instead of blowing precious development dollars on the Matador coupe and Pacer, it had used that money to give the Hornet the Concord treatment in 1975 and sold it alongside the Hornet as a downsized Ambassador. It could have then restyled the Gremlin into the Spirit for 1976, but given it the Javelin name, selling it as a more rational pony car that bridged the gap between the awkward Mustang II and sleek-but-cramped Camaro and Firebird.
In the end, it probably wouldn’t have mattered. In the Civil War, the talents of Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson couldn’t overcome the Confederacy’s disadvantages that were rooted in an economic system based on slavery. That hindered its economic development and stopped Great Britain or France from coming to its aid during the Civil War.
AMC ultimately couldn’t survive as an independent, despite the talents of George Romney, Dick Teague and Roy Chapin, Jr, because it could not compete head-on with the richer Big Three. The Confederacy died because it found itself on the wrong side of history in regards to slavery, but AMC vanished, ironically enough, because George Romney was more right than even he realized. Americans would happily drive more rationally sized cars. The only problem was that Americans buying those cars could be swayed by style and status, too. A Ramber Rebel or even an AMC Ambassador was ultimately no match for an Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme that had been styled by Bill Mitchell’s troops.
But, over 30 years later, we can still appreciate this Hornet hatchback, not only for its handsome looks, but as the final High Water Mark of the independent automakers. Sitting in a yard in suburban Harrisburg – without, oddly enough, any “For Sale” placards – it shows off its smooth, sleek lines. We can appreciate Dick Teague’s efforts to keep the final independent alive, even if they weren’t ultimately enough to turn the tide of history.
The South lost? Shut yo mouth, boy.
Next thing you know, Paul will be questioning America’s stunning victory in Vietnam. Sheesh!
My bad; I forgot to put in the right author: Greg Beckenbaugh (geeber)
Yes, my dad is a rebel technically and my mom is a Yankee but in every aspect other than cotton, the south was hopelessly underpowered to win a war against the union.
I liked the Hornet from the windowsills down. The rooflines always elicited yawns from me.
Never seen one of those, only the sedan as per the advert. Much better than most of their other styling efforts
Javelin or AMX are my favorites.
The hatchback came close to the styling of the Javelin. My dad called mine “the little Javelin.”
Now you’re talking! This is right up my alley.
The Hornet hatch pictured was the very last new car I checked out in August, 1973, just before getting out of the air force at an AMC Jeep dealership in Sacramento! In yellow.
I truly liked the concept and it certainly looked like a lighter, simpler car than what the Chevy Nova had turned into with the advent of railroad track bumpers which made it look very clumsy compared to the 1972 model.
These cars as well as AMC as a whole impressed me ever since the Rebel coupe came out then the Javelin and the AMX then the coupe de grace – the Gremlin! Yes, I mean that!
The main thing that bothered me about AMC was the flimsy-looking (accurate) interior materials that did result in warped dashboards and split seats.
Overall, I believe AMC had the right idea, but the execution couldn’t hold a candle in many areas to GM and Ford and was pretty even with Chrysler at the time, sad to say.
The only thing I hold against AMC was using that awful school bus yellow color on their cars! Shoulda been banned!
EDIT: I hate the south and everything below the Ohio river – including Kentucky, where I now work!
I knew I’d find Zackman here somewhere in the replies…
I think there was a time that it was advantageous for AMC to hold on to some of the “old” stuff, i.e., their unit bodies and 258 c.i. sixes. While the other three were going through all kinds of contortions to remain up-to-date vis-a-vis the competition, old AMC plugged along with its somewhat antiquated but reliable lineup.
Let’s face it, CAFE was the independent killer in the 1980’s. If there hadn’t been the NHTSA, EPA and CAFE regs put in place to dramatically raise fuel mileage specs (among other things) and forcing carmakers to build cars people really didn’t want. AMC could have continued, somewhat like the cottage industry carmakers in the UK.
I’m glad my car has airbags, anti-lock brakes and computer controlled ignition. But there are times I want to light up a carbureted engine and shift my own gears to my own rhythm, not the pre-programmed cadence of a integrated chip somewhere under the dash.
I would like to have the opportunity to purchase a 2012 version of the 1969 AMC AMX, even if it did cost $40K. Well, I guess I can to some extent, the 2012 Challenger is about as close as they come.
You would have thought we could have worked something out for the smaller producer(s). Keep the Avantis, the Bearcats, the Zimmers and even the AMC’s going.
More choices are good, right?
Geo, the more I run, the less I can hide!
CAFE is one of those useless government rules – free market would drive mileage without the need for arbitrary and capricious standards driven by idiot bureaucrats. The consumer will switch when the wallet is hit hard or not. Let the companies who want to build gas misers do so or those who want to risk a truck heavy mix suffer and adjust.
I also believe an automaker should be allowed to sell non-compliant cars for safety as long as they disclose what the vehicle does not have and let the buyer risk his life – its his right. I would, of course advocate that cars meet structural standards, but air bags or other non-structural items should be left to the automaker with proper disclosure.
Paul…so you were back east recently?
The “HVC” prefix on the license plate tells me it’s a relatively recent PA registration, they just go in alphabetical order. Also our fair state hasn’t had a decent-looking plate in over 30 years. Just my opinion…
I forgot to put in the right author: Greg Beckenbaugh (geeber). My bad. Fixed now.
Ah, the death spiral. Just as success feeds on itself; so too does the stench of death repel efforts to reinvigorate. American Motors was looking sickly from the mid-late 1960s, when peddling their dated intermediate and compact offerings. Even at the time, observers were incredulous that they’d entered into congress with Kaiser Jeep. History shows that was a wise move and THE element that kept it propped up to 1988 – but no one could see that at the time; and the money spent was money they just couldn’t spare.
The stench got thicker…hidden somewhat by Teague’s clever styling. The Gremlin was a Sawzall job, not unlike the Lark. The Hornet, here, was done to a price; it was a nice job but not an overly great car; and timeless, it was not. And the health of the company did not improve with high numbers of sales on a low-margin economy car.
In this mix, they needed a Great Leader – a Lutz or Iacocca or Ghosen. Instead, they got Gerald Myers, a time-server out of the engineering department, with all the vision of that pencil-vendor with a white cane.
What came out of it was blunder after blunder; money wasted that the company tried to recoup with garish graphics on the Jeeps and poseur AMXs. Renault kept them alive and on life-support for a decade; and François Castaing did yeoman duty as a Light-Brigade underdog general…but the trend, as we’ve seen with Packard, with Studebaker, with Chrysler today, is well-nigh impossible to reverse.
Ah, what would have been. The company’s fate was sealed with George Romney’s departure…he did well for himself, but he left his business to whither and die.
The name eludes me but I liked the model that indicated to the atmosphere the direction to follow to enter the engine intake.
That was an indicator of southern hospitality and courtesy.
That’s the SC/Rambler-
http://www.musclecarcalendar.com/MyGarage2004/MattScrambler/ScramblerHome.htm
That’s it.
Ahhhh… the driving delights of days gone by.
Wow, I have never seen combinations of vinyl roof and hatchback! A combination of modernity and old school, I guess. The car certainly hides its hatchback shape well. It seems like a common theme back then, hatchbacks that don’t look like hatchbacks, but more like a conventional sedans or coupes.
Wow, I have never seen combinations of vinyl roof and hatchback!
If it don’t go… BROUGHAM it!
Other areas of AMC technological anachronisms include a Torque-Tube suspension until the end of ’66, and kingpin & trunnion front suspensions, finally getting ball joints in 1970.
And vacuum wipers through ’71!!
The trunnion part is right but the lower A arm had ball joints and no kingpins. And the Torque-Tube is solid. I had my ’63 Classic set up with HD springs and air shocks and cruising downtown Portland at 25 mph I could take a corner flat with no body lean, just crank the wheel and the car followed around the corner. Once I made it from Seaside, OR to NE 39th & Sandy blvd in Portland, OR in 55 mins. As far as vacuum wipers, with a double diaphragm fuel pump and a vacuum canister they work great and are infinitely adjustable unlike electric wipers. And I towed my friend’s ’64 Malibu home more than once back in the late 60’s-early ’70s The BW auto transmission could take a lot of abuse. When I finally totaled my ’63 it had 144,000 on it and had never even had the pan off of it. The only 2 auto transmissions I ever had fail were both TF’s. Just my personal experience.
Folks: I forgot to change the author from the default (me) to the right author: Greg Beckenbaugh (geeber). Sorry!
Better looking than a Maverick or Dart yes, but I would still put it 2nd to the 1968-1972 Nova, which to me is the best looking domestic compact. The AMC-Kaiser tie up is an interesting analogy to the Studebaker-Packard merger from a few days ago, this was one merger that made it work. Instead of spending money on the Matador and Maverick, they should have pony-car-ed up a Hornet and sold it as a compact Javelin.
Ah yes – my 1972 Nova. I bought it soon after I returned home from the service. Sure wish I would have kept it longer. Superior to every other competitor in its class in every single way.
Well, little old anachronistic me liked AMC’s later offerings and I paid for the right to comment. I think there were two high points and neither was a hornet. The first was the rambler american with a big enough engine bay to accomodate anything and an automatic sleeper status.
Where I put my money though was the second high point. I was driven to AMC by a serial self destructing 77 Olds Starfire (vega with a 231) straight into the arms of the 78 AMC Concorde with the Chrysler automatic backing a 258. It needed two more doors for my young family but otherwise was perfect.
I shipped that from Norfolk to Guam and never regretted it. I would have shipped it back but you can only ship one at taxpayer expense and I needed that new Datsun Truck that I got for a killer price in Guam.
If I could go back and pick one off the shelf for my current stage of life, the ramber american with the largest six available (258 in 66 IIRC) would sure be tempting.
Mom bought a 1979 Concord after dad died. I told that story some time ago, but she kept it until she stopped driving in 1990. What a great car and her first new car!
I really liked the ’78 and ’79 Concords, the ’79 was one of those rare facelifts that improved the styling, at least in my opinion. One of our neighbors had a pristine white ’79 Concord coupe with the color-coordinated wheel covers. He still had it when we moved in 1995, and it was still in mint condition.
I lived in Milwaukee in the late 70’s.
The AMC Concord D/L was greeted by excitement among the faithful at that time.
My boss had an Ambassador – we called it the “Kenosha Cadillac”. He cried when it was destroyed in an accident.
I owned a 1971 AMC Hornet 4 door. Ugh, what a total piece of junk. Compared to my 1970 Impala, it was like driving a car built in the 1930s. It was like every component was made of cast iron. It was bulky, stodgy, unreliable and poorly built. And ugly. And highly embarrassing to this teenager.
The exhaust leak has to have taken years off my life as it created a cloud in the passenger compartment. The clutch broke. The brakes broke. The wiring for the lights broke.
I did like the 3 on the tree though. And the fact that the ignition switch never worked so you didn’t need keys at all. Which was fine – who was going to steal that car?
Good summary. I’ll bet the wiper wiring never gave you trouble, though…
(For the unschooled: AMC used vacuum wipers through 1971)
I had a Gremlin of that vintage; it had three-on-the-floor, and that made for woe when the transmission broke a shift fork. But…Saginaw steering columns and locks of that era were known for the lock wearing to where the key could be removed in the “Off/Unlocked” position. Once out, the user could turn it freely between Off and Run and Start…turning it to LOCKED locked it up again, though, requiring a key.
Keyless! I LOVED it! (Late 1970s ChryCo products would have the same sort of wear, sometimes…)
That wasn’t due to wear that was the standard operation of pre 73 GM ignition switches, My 69 LeSabre, 72 Scout II and 72 Travelall are so equipped while my 73 Scout and Travelette are not. I also remember my father used to use the key to stir/clean out the tobacco from his pipe pulling it out of the ign sw of our Buick wagon while driving down the road when it was still pretty new.
I don’t remember seeing many Hornet hatchbacks in the day but the 4 door was a staple of Federal motor pools throughout its lifetime because AMC was always low bid on the contract. I actually had some passenger seat time in a Hornet because my grandfather bought one in 73 or so to replace his Ambassador.
USCG COMMSTA Honolulu in 1980 had a green dog dish hubcap ’78 Concord GSA “staff car”. 258 Six – tan tuck n’ roll vinyl seats and black rubber floor mats!
I always loved the Hornet Sportwagon — anyone else? BTW, according to journalist friends who knew Dick Teague pretty well, he was not only a singularly gifted stylist, but also one of the funniest guys in the business. I wish I could repeat what he said whenever someone asked if he was busy, but this being a PG site and all…
Me too. I loved the Sportwagon, kinda. I’ll explain:
I used my brother’s Eagle wagon many times back in the 80’s for hauling stuff home from the lumber yard. A great size car and could haul more than you might think.
You would have loved the Cowboy…an AMC concept pickup-car, based on the Hornet platform Two one-off versions were done; one with a Hornet front clip; the other using Gremlin trim and branded a Jeep.
The other:
That looks similae size to the big 3 Aussie utes it coulda been a winner in the right market
The Gremlin was butt ugly, compared to the Pacer, but neither were paragons of styling but THIS, now this could’ve have worked in that AMC/Jeep stylistic kind of way as a Ranchero type of vehicle.
I’ve seen the Cowboy in the flesh, IIRC it was at a car show in the Detroit area several years back. The one with the Hornet nose.
It is a great size not unlike the 60’s Rancheros, which I thought were a right-sized car.
The Cowboy looks like a right sized car based utility personal car for the 70’s. The El Camino and Ranchero were too big, fortunately if AMC had taken the plunge.
It seems that every time AMC came to a decision point, they usually took the wrong turn. A case in point was their “Sensible Spectaculars” advertising campaign which
sent a mixed message to buyers. The company was apparently trying to appeal to
practical economy buyers (from George Romney’s era) and to buyers interested in styling and got an ad campaign that appealed to neither group. I think it was in 1964 one of their magazine ads blasted the big 3 for their race after horsepower while at the same time boasting of their 327 v8 with 270 horsepower…you can’t have it both ways.
Gerald Meyers definitely didn’t do the company any favors–both the Matador and Pacer were failures which eventually drove the company into an unfortunate merger with Renault which did neither company any good. Meyers was on the AMC board of directors when AMC merger with Jeep and he opposed it…one of the few correct moves that AMC made.
I can’t help but think that a modernized Hornet and Javelin would have been much more successful. Also, I’d like to know whose brilliant idea it was to name a car after a guy who wears a funny suit and dances around a ton of angry pot roast? You could probably count the followers of the “sport” in the U.S. on the fingers of one hand.
Another one of my all time favorites. Back when CC posted the CC on the 1965 Pontiac LeMans (or was it a Tempest?), I’d mentioned that one of sons of the Austrian immigrant families we were friends with had one. His next car? A lemon yellow (with orange accent stripes) 1974 AMC Hornet hatchback.
It was the biggest hatchback car I’d ever seen, and it was rooooooomy back there. Enough for you and a female friend, possibly. It was the car that made me a hatchback fan. He did the same thing with the Hornet as the LeMans, kick up the back a little, add some wider wheels and tires and a kickin’ 8 track stereo. With speakers in the cargo area! Cool!
Of course Rudy’s string of hits with the ladies continued unabated as it had with the LeMans. It impressed the crap out of a prepubescent me. I mean, what was his secret? It must be the car. Maybe girls like lemon yellow cars???
I’ve long wished to find a nice Hornet (of any configuration), as I want to desecrate it with a SBC and 700R4 & etc. I’d really like to find the hatchback.
In lemon yellow.
I have to respectfully disagree with some comments above regarding the Pacer as a failure. It sold 145, 528 units IN THE FIRST YEAR (compare that to the Chevy Volt). It also had several design features that were way ahead of their time and took another 20 years to become widespread.
Sure, the quality wasn’t the best – my brother bought one in high school and stuffed a 400SBC/Turbo 400 in it, along with a third member from a V8 Pacer wagon, filled with a posi differential out of a Javelin SST. It surprised a lot of people!
Pacer first year sales #’s can’t be compared to anything from today.And, it couldn’t maintain its momentum, it was a curiousity for ‘gotta have first one’ buyers, but then after that, bye bye.
It’s with Edsel in the “Auto Hall of InFame”.
Ive never seen the hatchback model tudor and fordor versions made it here. There is something of a glut on local auction site trademe of Ramblers of all models right now they are coming out of the woodwork in all states of disrepair.
I had a ’76 Pacer X. I loved it. Bought it for $400 in 2002. The A/C still worked, only thing wrong with it was a missing choke arm on the 1BBL and a severed alternator wire. The wire was simple enough, it used a GM alternator so a pigtail was available anywhere. The choke arm was harder to find and keep. I lost two, finally on the third I made it to where it wouldn’t shake itself free. Front shocks were not available, I noticed they were close to the ones from my ’77 Thunderbird. A little modification of a bushing washers, and a perfect fit.
I drove it for years, finally on yet another day of a 120 mile round trip commute, the 258 gave up.
The Pacer to me, was close to the high water mark for AMC. I’d always liked quirky, and AMC had a lot of that.
Oh boy: my mother had a six-cylinder ’75 Hornet four-door sedan during the second half of my high school years. It was a sickly pale pea green, and about as embarrassing a car as I could imagine one of my parents driving. (My father had a series of old pickups, which were cool enough in their way.) By the time I was heading to college they’d unloaded it and replaced it with a ’78 Blazer, the better to carry my stuff back and forth.
The swoopy hatchback styling reminds me a tiny bit of the Matador coupe, only better!
My mom had one of these in the late ’70s, awkward vinyl top and all. By all accounts it was a good car, albeit one with a geeky reputation. It was replaced by a new Toyota and she never looked back.
I always wonder how AMC would have faired had Romney stuck around. They still would have taken a beating from the GM A-cars and shifting buyer preferences, but the balance sheet probably would have been a lot healthier. And if they kept their economy car focus (and cash reserves) into the early ’70s, things may have turned out very differently.
Of course, after he left, AMC almost went out of their way to dismiss George Romney, almost out of spite and much to their own peril. Interestingly, the Republicans are doing the essentially the same thing with their “Anybody but Mitt” silliness, guaranteeing similar peril come November*.
* Apologies in advance for the political commentary.
I always wonder how AMC would have fared if it had not spent millions on an office building in Detroit (the American Center) and instead had spent that money on a new factory in Kenosha.
I loved the Hornets all the way through the Concord and Eagle years. The true high point, for me, would be a 71 Hornet SC360 with Ram Air and Go Pack.
I always wanted to do a “Round Light” Hornet front clip swap on my Eagle wagon with a 360 swap. All wheel drive with a mild small block would have been FUN!
Was wondering if anyone was going to mention the Hornet SC/360. It usually gets forgotten in the shadow of the more flamboyant SC/Rambler. Don’t know how the 360 ran since I really don’t remember any road tests or comparisons of it when they were new (and they only lasted one year).
I’ve read that off the showroom floor they were in the 14.8 to 15.0 range, which put it right in the ballpark of a 340 Duster or 351 powered Mustang.
They were really trying to lock horns with the big boys with the SC but, sadly, too late in the game.
@sean: Great minds think alike. While driving my brother’s Eagle, I’d frequently thought it would have benefited from V8 power. While several carmakers were flogging performance models with AWD for on road driving, an Eagle SX-4 with the 304 would have been a hoot! Imagine the Spirit AMX with an AWD system.
Due to the CAFE laws and AMCs relatively small production, it never would have happened from the factory. But I know people have done it. I would do it, too, but with LT or LS power instead. And probably a whole new NP transfer case and some Dana axles to handle the power
Oooops, sorry.
I just MMed all over the place again….
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm you know what I’ve started to think. That after WW2 and the price war of the 50s, the independents and Chrysler were competeing for the same remaining slice of pie.
I had one when a kid. Chopped the roof, made a four door convert out of it, mind you with welded doors…had a hoot…loved the 258 auto….smooooooth…but with armstrong steering the gf hated parking it…I think everyone should sawsall off a roof or two as a rite of passage of sorts…makes one appreciate the finer things in life…like structural integrity for one…
Minor note: the Rambler nameplate died in the U.S. in 1970, but it continued for a lot of AMC’s remaining export markets for a few more years. The Javelin was actually marketed as a Rambler in some markets.
Australia for one.
With the anti-Vietnam feeling, “American Motors” would have been a liability they didn’t need.
Wow – my favorite car I’ve owned of all time! I had a ’73 in retina-burning red when I was in college in SC Pennsylvania (well familiar with Gettysburg). Towards the end of senior year (and during the Three Mile Island evacuation!), it got totaled. A year later I found another ’73 that ran me well for quite a few years.
The 232 was lame, and you were never sure if the electronics were from Ford or Chryco (Chryco starter, Ford voltage regulator)…but I loved those cars for their design lines and utility….
I had almost forgotten about this car. An excellent piece on a now-rare car. Until now, I had never put together the styling on this one and the Matador coupe that came out the next year. It looked better on this one, but I always preferred the notchback sedans. Actually, the Sportabout wagon was the only AMC car that really tempted me to buy one.
A minor nit – I thought that AMC called the Torqueflite a “Shift Command” transmission. Or maybe I am not remembering this correctly. It seems that Chrysler sold a lot of transmissions to AMC and International in the 70s.
In high school, I worked with a guy whose family was big into AMCs, particularly Hornets. His driver was a 70 Hornet with the 304 and his dad drove one of the newer Hornet hatchbacks in the sporty trim, whatever that was. The 70 was quite quick and was pleasant to look at, but inside, it was the automotive equivilent of the third world. AMC could even make Mopar interiors look good back then.
The AMC Shift Command and Flash O Matic transmissions were the pre 72 Borg Warner built autos.
Funny to think how rare it is now. My parents bought the Hornet wagon in ’76 and drove it for 4 – in their words – excruciating years. I remember it backfiring and a strange noise after we’d driven for a while and come to a stoplight. A sort of rin-rin-rin-rin-RIN-rin-rin.
As a 3 year old, my friend and I pulled large parts of the interior off.
My parents bought the car because they had a Rambler and loved it. They also owned a Mustang 2 and traded the Hornet in on an ’81 Datsun 201 wagon. I have told my father repeatedly that he can’t be trusted to buy anything with an engine larger than a lawnmower.
The UAW choosing AMC to strike in the fall of fall 69 didn’t help the introduction or the initial sales of the Hornet either. Had to mention this as no one brought up that bit of it’s history.
AMC was still putting in rubber floor coverings in their cars as late as 1971. The parent’s 71 Gremlin had them. Ford may have still been using them in Mavericks of that era as well.
I know that Chrysler was still using rubber flooring in strippo models at least as late as 1974. A friend’s price-leader 74 Charger was so equipped.
AMC still used rubber floor coverings on the Gremlin through the 1976 model year.
I had a ’76 Gremlin parts car with rubber mats and radio-delete. The mats were not of high quality either.
Wanted my uncles “75” two door sedan big time! Loved driving it.Best a/c ever! Larger size 6 cylinder under the hood.
Those floor coverings made a lot-more sense than carpet. They ere much easier to clean. Carpet was added only to lend an air of luxury. It was the vacuum wipers that floored me.
I had a 1970 Hornet–my first new car. In late ’72, I sold it to a neighbor, and bought a ’73 hatchback. What a looker! Interestingly, my neighbor had also had a first-year Mustang (pink!), and he had said that the Hornet came closest to the Mustang of any car he’d driven. Owing to my youthful immaturity, I had to have a 360 on the hatchback, which made it very difficult to keep the rear wheels on the road, especially in inclement weather. Not having learned the lesson of my youth, I bought a ’75 Matador coupe, also with a 360, plus the Oleg Cassini package. OMG, what a comfortable car–probably the most comfortable I’ve ever been in. The seats were bolstered and padded. The only ones that could come close were the Volvo’s. But the car was a disaster, mechanically. Things went wrong, right and left, starting with the warped intake manifold. By the time I had it all fixed up, the salesman who had sold it to me bought it back from me for his wife.
The Hornet was a good value–economical, good-looking and reliable (with the 6), and held its own against all comers. The problem with the Pacer was not its looks, but rather the fact that AMC didn’t have a 6 that was small and economical enough to meet the needs of the public faced with an oil shortage (created by our good friends, the Saudis) in the late ’70s. Without the money to develop a new 6, AMC began buying little engines from Pontiac, but my understanding at the time was that these were not as reliable as AMC’s venerable 6s. I guess it really didn’t matter, because, by then, the writing was on the wall, owing to the poor decisions referenced above. And the alliance with Renault was absolutely the worst thing AMC could have done, but it was a last-ditch effort to save the company. Renault never made good cars. Their reliability was typical for low-end European cars of the era.
The Concorde was an interesting specimen. It was down-right lavish inside. I couldn’t believe the materials and appointments. And it gave its owners good reliability and economy. But again, it was too little, too late for the beleaguered manufacturer. And this left me forever sad for it.
The Concord totally flew under the radar of most luxury car buyers. It’s too bad that AMC never properly promoted it. They were a very nice car.
It’s attractive, but its styling suffered from having to share the door and windows with the notchback coupe.
What was Chrysler’s aforementioned hatchback in this size range? I can’t think of one, at least that ran concurrent with the Hornet/Concord
That was the Dart with the fold down rear seat. I think the trunk lid wasn’t part of a hatch, though
Would love to find a Hornet/Concord or Gremlin/Spirit with the “AMC 2.0” SOHC 4 cyl. It was a former Audi/Porsche engine that AMC bought the rights, tooling and manufacturing line and built as their own in the US.
By contract they were not supposed to promote any connection to the original designers and builders.
Those would be a rare bird indeed.
A 78 Concord 2 door would be the ideal for me.
As a side note, the sedan and 2 door had the same rear wheel leg and head room. Buying a 2 door before the hatchback did not mean giving up room in the rear seat, like most 2 doors did in the 70s. Leg room was 35.5. . 1.1/10th of an inch less than a 2015 Malibu. An inch more than a Citation. Same as an A Body Celebrity.
Comments about the interiors are true: thin plastic that could have come out of a kid’s Vacu-Form kit, warped panels, misalignments [right out of the showroom],braided metal rope to attach the glove box door from the Gremlin to the Ambassador, short lived upholstery and troll doll hair quality carpeting exposed the cost cutting done to the extreme.
Rudiger mentioned the SC 360: Motor Trend did a test of one and responded to AMC’s then tag line: “If You Had To Compete With GM Ford and Chrysler, What Would You Do ?” with the comment: “Kick some butts on the assembly line and get them to finish their work. ” Which I hated to read, as I’ve been an AMC fan for decades, but if my parent’s Gremlin and Ambassador were any indication, this was all too true.
AMC was coasting on their quality rep from 1967 and well into the 70s. Things got so bad they offered the “Buyer Protection Plan” for the 72 model year to address the complaints.
Car and Driver even mentioned the quality lapses on their test 78 Concord, the basic car of which had been in production for nine model years. AMC was their own worst enemy.
Then take a Renault product and apply the same cost cutting and build “techniques”. A recipe for failure.
My grandmother’s “gentleman friend” lived a block away from McNight Motors in Chambersburg, which was the local AMC-Jeep dealer. If we visited on a Sunday, I would walk to the lot to look at the new AMC cars.
I remember thinking how cheap the interiors looked on the Gremlins and Hornets. The dashboards, in particular, were assembled with plastic panels that had poor fit even by lax 1970s standards. I also remember that thin, braided rope that held up the glove box door on my father’s 1973 Gremlin.
Geeber: we lived in Edenville, near Chambersburg 68-70.
Dad test drove a 70 & 1/2 Gremlin from McKnight. Water leaked in from the rear side window through a hole in the weatherstripping while he was driving it.
Moved to Davenport IA and did the same thing you did on a Sunday: haunted AMC’s dealership on Sunday once I got my driver’s license. Saw new cars with dash trim on the floor, rust forming at the roof corners, just distressing things.
There were also cars on the lot that had absolutely zero options. The sticker gave the base price, then destination and total. I loved it. Who does that ?? Then or now ?
I wanted AMC to succeed. I loved their cars and still do. A 70 Hornet or 78 Concord would be a great find: perfect size and room. A little low for me these days, though.
One of the nicest looking cars I have ever seen with an AMC badge was a 1979 Concord hatchback in white with the 304, rally wheels, a chrome band like a Targa and the burgundy velour. I know to many people’s minds eye it sounds atrocious, I just say you had to be there. Those were the days of Pontiac T-A’s with chickens, opera windows, etc., and 20% prime rate. You think getting a loan was tough in 2008? Try getting one with a 1%/mo. usury cap when buying at 19.8. Everything was perpetually in flux. Including design mores. It is easy to criticize with the benefit of many years hindsight. I give Teague big props for swinging for the fences. Why not go down with the possibility – however remote – of a home run?
IMHO, the Hornet was one of those rare cars that seemed to get better looking with the advancing years…IF, if you could look past some of the interior fit and finish “issues”.
When it debuted, I thought the Hornet hatchback was a refreshing daring idea. Then when you added the “X” package and/or the 360 V8….
AMC found itself boxed in by the mid-’60’s when compact and intermediates flooded forth from the Big Three as well. But that was to be expected once AMC had demonstrated there was a viable market for such cars. Abernethy takes considerable blame for the 1966-67 debacle but no one has presented much of a better plan that could have avoided the troubles. Here’s a few, in retrospect.
Certainly, creating a modern generation of engines and updating from such antediluvian engineering as flatheads and torque-tube drive earlier would have helped. Compacts had settled into a flat market by the later ’60’s, needed something to attract repeat customers more than styling. The only ace-in-the-hole AMC might have played was greatly improved build quality, reliability and longevity by significant engineering improvements, caveat being the longer-term affects of that take a while to be realized by the general public, hopefully before bankruptcy sets in.
If management had recognized the growing acceptance of the international-sized luxury compacts and intermediates quickly enough, they might well have developed just such a car as their Ambassador. They had platforms appropriately sized, just had to bring in a Mercedes-Benz 280SE sedan as benchmark. Shame it didn’t dawn on them in the mid-’60’s to do so.
If management had recognized the growing acceptance of the international-sized luxury compacts and intermediates quickly enough, they might well have developed just such a car as their Ambassador. They had platforms appropriately sized, just had to bring in a Mercedes-Benz 280SE sedan as benchmark. Shame it didn’t dawn on them in the mid-’60’s to do so.
Did you read my front wheel drive “what if” a while back? Keep the ex-Buick V6 they inherited when they bought Jeep, modify it the way GM did, after they bought it back, to smooth the timing and revise for transverse installation. Bolt on the version of the Type 35 automatic that B-W had designed for transverse installation in the Austin Landcrab. Scale up the suspension of the Saab 99. Put a tightly wrapped, space efficient body on it, and *presto* a 1975 Ambassador that has all the positives of a 1982 GM A body, particularly the Buick version, which I think is particularly attractive.
Then lop two cylinders off the 258, turn it sideways, shorten the platform a bit from the Ambassador, and wrap it in a clean hatchback body….like the Citation, except all the major components of the AMC version would have already had years of debugging under their belts.
I love the Hornet in the two door but the four door make sme want to run away from it fast! I can see some styling ques borrowed from this for the Chevy Citation and Ford Pinto borrowed the nose idea.
Romney would later criticize Abenethy’s direct attack on the Big Three, but, in reality, he had few options, given that they were invading AMC’s market segments.
Abernethy has taken a lot of criticism, including from me, but, as you point out, the big three were not giving AMC any place to hide, like they had in the late 50s.
It could have then restyled the Gremlin into the Spirit for 1976, but given it the Javelin name, selling it as a more rational pony car that bridged the gap between the awkward Mustang II and sleek-but-cramped Camaro and Firebird.
I think I posted these pix on CC recently, but since you bring up the Mustang II and Camaro. The concept didn’t make the cut. That was right when they were pouring money into the Matador coupe and Pacer.
The rear view looks particularly purposeful.
I love that car. If AMC had only produced it for 1976 as the next-generation Javelin. The car would have been a hit. Even the 1979-80 Spirit, which borrowed the basic shape, was a decent seller, even though AMC was clearly on the ropes by that point.
Thank you for posting the photos!
Ya imagine if they could have offered; the 2.0 4cyl, the 6 cyl, a V8 with the option of a 5 speed years before the domestic competition.
This is sharp. All the oddities that they did approve, and this didn’t make the cut? The world is a strange place.
This is sharp. All the oddities that they did approve, and this didn’t make the cut? The world is a strange place.
I showed those pix to Vince Geraci, who was head of AMC interior design in the 70s, at the local AMC meet. He shook his head and said “they made so many mistakes”
Another great Curbside Classic.
Here’s a photo of the high point of the AMC Hornet hatchbacks, a very rare 360-equipped 1973 Hornet Hatchback X.
More details about this car can be found here.
http://www.javelinamx.com/javhome/jwr/73hornet360/
If anyone should happen to run across a 1978 Concord hatchback, please let me know by replying to to this post. I’m looking to buy one/ As much as I like the original Hornet body style, the interiors found in the later Concords is trimmed to a much higher level.
Thanks,
Rich Truesdell
The Concord hatchbacks are rare birds. I don’t recall seeing one when they were new, although I do remember seeing one or two of the 1978 AMX version.
I’ve never seen a Concord hatchback in person. I used to see Hornet hatchbacks when I was a boy, but never a Concord.
That is one great-looking car. Stylistically, I think the ’73 Hornet hatch trumps every other domestic compact that year (and I am a Plymouth Duster fan). I bet this one *moves*.
That is my car, except mine had a vinyl roof. Vinyl roofs were de rigeur in the ’70s.
This particular Hornet hatchback was still for sale – parked in the same yard – until about a year ago. The car was actually solid, and would have made either a nice show car or even a daily driver with some elbow grease and detailing.
This has always been my favourite AMC cars. They’re small enough for most drivers to drive comfortably. I like the styling of the larger cars, like the Ambassador, and Matador, but they’d be way too large for my driving tastes. I also like the later Concord, Spirit, and Eagle AWD wagon.
the larger cars, like the Ambassador, and Matador, but they’d be way too large for my driving tastes.
I think it’s a matter of once you go small, you never want to go back. I spent a lot of windshield time in Ambassador wagons in the early 70s, and they never seemed ponderous to me. After driving Civics, Escorts and such for the last 30 years, I bought a Ford Taurus X a few years ago. The T-Rex was 7″ shorter and 2″ narrower than those Ambi wagons, yet it seemed gigantic, and I was relieved to dump it in favor of a VW Jetta wagon, which is 20″ shorter.
I agree. I’ve been driving small cars since I started driving in my 20s. I’ve never driven anything larger than a Toyota 4 Runner.
I am strangely drawn to this. The Hornet really wasn’t a very good car, yet in some versions, particularly the wagon, it could be rather good looking.
This hatch was pretty rare, and dare I say I think maybe the best looking two-door Hornet? I think the vinyl adds a nice element. An oddity of the Hornet, AMC used to advertise that you got bright metal trim on the door window frames of even the most base Matador, yet you could not get bright metal on any Hornet. This car looks okay with the dark paint sort of hiding the econo car painted door frames, but some bright trim would have really spruced this up.
An oddity of the Hornet, AMC used to advertise that you got bright metal trim on the door window frames of even the most base Matador, yet you could not get bright metal on any Hornet.
The bright metal on the door window frames on senior AMCs is not trim, it is the window frame. I don’t know when AMC started with the solid aluminum frames, but our 64 Classic for sure had them, and from pix, it looks like the 70s seniors continued the practice.
Here’s a pic of a frame of unknown vintage from an eBay listing
Nash began using that type of window frame with the first compact Rambler. The “senior” cars began using that type of window frame in 1952, when the “Farina-styled” models debuted.
Not sure I would call these AMC’s “high-water” mark. The styling was timeless and classic, but the cars had a cheap interior and terrible seats. There was also a lot of bare metal showing inside and they didn’t even have full door panels, there was strip of bare metal along the inside top of the doors.
Overall I think Concord was much better executed, if a bit broughamy for some. Build quality seemed to be better as well. The last 2 years of the hatchback (1978 & 1979) were really nice, but I always preferred the sporty wagons.
I’ve read several comments about the painted interior upper sills. It wasn’t because they were being cheap, but was common practice in the 60s as well.
Painted metal upper door sills were common and unremarkable, unlike the womb like interiors we have today. Seen in hindsight it looks pretty crude.
Dart/Valiant, Hornet/Gremlin, Pinto, Chevette, the Japanese imports, VW Bug and Rabbit and other Euro offerings all had the same painted interior metal showing.
I’ve read several comments about the painted interior upper sills. It wasn’t because they were being cheap, but was common practice in the 60s as well.
My 78 Zephyr Z7 had the low buck interior, and painted doors. There was a vinyl covered panel snapped over the hole in the inner door panel, but from the top of that panel to the window sill was red painted steel. I noticed it because my 70 Cougar had had a much nicer quality interior. The higher trim Zephyr interiors may have had vinyl covering all the door, but mine didn’t
In its’ ’71 launch year, the Sportabout wagon outsold the Hornet two- and four-door sedans combined; it remained the top seller of the line for the entire Hornet-nameplate run at least.
I’d lay most of that on the lack of competition; until the Aspen/Volare appeared for ’76 your other choices were an import, a Pinto/Vega, or a so-called midsize wagon that was as big or bigger than a full-size had been up to ’65 or so.
Great-looking cars, especially in hatchback and wagon form. Very few survive in the south/mid-Atlantic though; I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen a Hornet or Concord on the road. Maybe an Eagle wagon or two, but even those seem hazy in the “way back” of memories.
I did see a tidy little mid 60’s American street parked last year, but that’s the only AMC I can specifically remember seeing outside a show in the past 10? years.
My late darling wife and I shared our first kiss in her “new” used 1974 Hornet with the Orleans song “Love Takes Time” on the AM radio (in 1979). The Hornet will always have a large share of my heart. I miss her and her Hornet.
The Confederacy did not ‘find’ itself on the wrong side of history – it chose.
Bought my 74 Hornet Hatchback new, came with the 75 grille. Had the 258 six, was my first car. Added hooker headers & dual exhaust. Paint: Mellow yellow, interior: black. Was a good car, added mags w/ Michelin radial tires and cruise control. Made a few cross country trips from MD to AZ and CA and back. Was very comfortable on the highway with the radial tires vs the bias ply of the day. The car survied me @ 16 years old into my 20’s.
I kepted it for 5 years, until I fell in love with a new 79 Mercury Capri RS.
Extra comments about this car.
It was a very good inexpensive car for it’s time
Faults:
1) Had to replace “T.A.C.” hose every couple of weeks. It was an aluminum hose covered with black paper. It connected the air filter to the exhaust header, providing warm air to the carburetor during startup. It was designed poorly, and was easily damaged just by bumping it. Without it, the engine would take longer to warm up.
2) The drivers seat was a problem, dealer had to replace the bottom section a number of times, as the support kept breaking where the seat back hinged together. The hinge didn’t fail, it was the rear section on the bottom seat.
3) A tapping noise was heard, the dealer replaced the lifters, and still heard the noise. Then the rocker arms were replaced. Turns out, the last rocker was scored, thus creating the tapping. After replacing, was quite as new!
4) Valve cover design caused the gasket to leak oil. Unlike “normal” covers, A.M.C.’s design had the bottom metal rolled over where the gasket met. Later in 1977, AMC changed it, and made it with a “channel” where the gasket met. I changed over to this design and had no more valve cover oil leaks.
5) The hatchback gas filled supports failed and replaced twice. When they fail, the hatchback would not stay opened.
General Comments:
It was my first car. I was in the last year of High School, and holding down a job. My friends accepted it as a “cool” car.
The stock AM radio was the first thing to be replaced, for of all things, an “AM/FM 8-Track player!
The stock shocks were next to be replaced, as they were not very good. Put air shocks in the back. Kids then loved that raised rear look. My dad threatened to cut the lines if he ever saw it “jacked up”
After the stock tires wore out at 29k miles, replaced with Michelin’s. Boy that really improved the ride. It was so noticeable. Felt like a new car.
The folding rear seat came in handy for hauling things and for date night!!
The car survived my “teenage years”. I tried to run the heck out of it, and it kept coming back for more.
Dick Teague was the genius of automotive design. This car was a mini Javelin. I had a ’73 hatchback X, copper with white vinyl roof. No problems with the car, but I had to have the 360, and that was the problem. Too front-heavy, and, whenever it snowed, I couldn’t keep the car going straight. ‘Way-too-much power for such-a-light vehicle. Sold it to my brother. Now wish I had it. It was a real looker!
And the front and rear bumpers were interchangeable.
I seem to remember the Studebaker Lark had them too, but I’m coming up blank for any major-ish maker doing this post-WWII until the Hornet. Anyone else have a better handle on this?
I guess you had to be there. I was born the year the Hornet debuted, so when I became car-savvy (around the same time AMC was circling the drain) a decade of seeing rusty Gremlins, Pacers, and Matador coupes on the road made the brand seem cheap rather than thrifty and odd-ball rather than unique. If Chevy was Coke and Ford was Pepsi, AMC was Mr. Pibb.
Snobbery aside, I give respect the brand now that I know more about their history and ingenuity, but I still can’t muster any enthusiasm.
The handsome Hatchback bodystyle should have been there from the outset, it could have gone right up against the Nova or Duster. Mind you I think the “coupe” is handsome enough but it’s purely a 2-door sedan, it just screams frugal unless you were one of the few who sprung for a SC360(tell me that wouldn’t have sold way better if it were available in his bodystyle!) even the outgoing 1969 Rambler still had the hardtop coupe available.
The design was solid though, some may disagree but I think the later incarnations as Eagles fit in remarkably well with the squared off sheer look lines of cars of the early to mid 80s but aged better than them with their still in vogue flared fender arches that weren’t so easily massaged away from the original design. It’s easy to cite the long lifespan of this basic bodyshell as a sign of failure, death, lack of resources… all of which are true, but had AMC eschewed the Pacer, dropped out of the floundering intermediate and full size game when they dropped out of ponycars and focused on refining this basic Hornet with new engines, improved suspension and other things of substance with the savings these could have been something akin to one of those long lived European type cars that everyone loves where refining a core good looking design is the norm. The 4×4 Eagle was a near glimpse to that alternate reality,
AMC’s high-water mark was either the 1963-65 Ramblers or the 1984 Jeep Cherokee
AMC could have survived if it sunk its money into something other than styling. After 1965, all AMC products were attractive bodies on old cars.
Had they chosen to ensure that their Hornet was the best compact, kept it thoroughly modern, offered variations of it, and topped it off with Jeep 4WD, (which they eventually did), they would have become the American Volvo. Gilding an old lily however, is all AMC kept doing.
While we all love the Dick Teague designs on the outside, there simply is no way we should ignore the ancient technologies underneath them.
The 1956 Rambler had the OHV modification of the flathead 3.2 liter six. The flathead was the price cutter engine, and the OHV was the upgrade. This continued until the 1965 new OHV engines and the end of the flat head. Also, from 1961 to 1964, AMC offered an aluminum block six of 196 cubic inches. Cast iron head, it had some problems similar to the Vega with the same aluminum block cast iron head expansion issues. AMC was not just a troglodyte in Detroit…
I missed the boat on these, or rather their Concord successors, as I could finally afford (sort of) a new one by ’82 or ’83. I didn’t even consider one of these then, as I’d bit a piece of guardrail with my ’74 Datsun 710 since I was still living up north in the snowbelt, made FWD a requirement (forget about 4WD, though I guess Subaru had it in some cars (not in all of them yet) and AMC hadn’t come out with their AWD vehicles quite yet (OK, maybe more ’81 than ’82 or ’83. I bought a ’78 Scirocco but was only to live in the snowbelt a couple more years; I joined my parents who had moved to central Texas. I guess I could have bought one in ’86 instead of my GTi, but I didn’t need AWD, just air conditioning (which my Scirocco, bought up north didn’t have). So it was more of what I needed changing, and what AMC offered changing (and the two didn’t line up).
My Dad owned 2 Rambler Classic wagons in a row, a ’61 and a ’63. Don’t know what happened to the ’61 that he traded it so soon, but the ’63 was totalled in an accident outside our motel room when we were moving from Catonsville to Burlington, VT (the first time…we actually moved back to Vermont 10 years later, though from Manassas, VA to Shelburne, Vt). With both Grandparents in northern PA, we drove up right through Gettysburg on frequent trips to visit them. There wasn’t a bypass around the town back then; we’d usually stop at the Distelfink for a steak sandwich, they were $1 back then (yes, it was about 50 years ago that we did that). Of course living in Manassas, where there were 2 Civil war battles a year apart we were in prime area for that. People were just starting to move to Manassas as a bedroom community for DC, but my Dad worked right in the town…my teacher back then sent me to a speech therapist since I talked different than my classmates (since my parents were from PA) but after one visit, it turned out that I just didn’t speak southern yet, and she wasn’t used to hearing a PA accent.
Would have liked to have owned an AMC, guess it wasn’t meant to be. Funny thing is that I’m more into the sedan than the hatchback or wagon (and I’m a longtime hatchback owner). Other than that, RWD would suit me just fine where I live now.