Unsuccessful cars are a bit like bad TV shows. Everyone remembers the runaway hits, (Hill Street Blues), but how many people get all choked up when reminiscing about Cop Rock? Same creators and a lot of the same themes and storylines, but a very different result. The failures are soon forgotten and everybody just blanks out that part of their remembrance and moves on. Today’s CC is like that, in its own way. In its short run, the 1977/78 Riviera aspired to be the Ne Plus Ultra of personal luxury, Buick style. Today, it’s seen more clearly for what it was: a GM placeholder that only borrowed the hard won mantle of an iconic nameplate.
We’ve often revisited the economic and social earthquakes that had made the car business a tough way to make a living in the second half of 1970’s. The decline of the muscle car, the first oil crisis and raging recession followed by rampant inflation made long term planning a fool’s errand during the malaise era.
Car companies are like supertankers – lots of inertia going forward, but really tough to steer. When the word came down during the first oil shock that GM was putting all its makes on a crash diet, it proved a surprising technical challenge. It was almost too easy to add weight – just listen to the focus groups and marketing surveys and make it longer and wider. But slimming down required a totally different approach.
Cars couldn’t just shed parts to reach their target weight. They had to have different DNA from concept to showroom floor. Thus when GM led the downsizing trend in 1977, there were mixed results across all car lines. Some models (Caprice, LeSabre) handled the transition with aplomb. Others (Monte Carlo, Cutlass in ’78) looked like a child’s drawing of their former selves.
It was a period of adjustment to a world without cheap oil and car designers were looking for something, anything, that would bridge the gap between old and new and still turn a profit. The designers at GM’s Buick division had an almost impossible mandate: whip up a two year only gap plugger that would buy valuable time for the division to complete the downsizing of the Riviera and move the car to a front wheel drive configuration. A tall task, to be sure.
It was decided at GM HQ that the Riv would join the Oldsmobile Toronado and Cadillac Eldorado in its new E body FWD platform planned for ’79. That left two selling seasons to kill before the new cars would be ready and Buick management scoured the lineup for a body shell that could plausibly pass for “personal luxury” in its 2 door guise. The Skylark and Regal were out; they would have been such obvious badge jobs that the division would be risking the future of a car that did profitable business even given its relatively modest (23,000 annual units) volume. Likewise the Electra. The 225 was the “big” (though recently downsized) Buick. The whole ”personal” luxury theme would be lost with a tarted up deuce and a quarter, so the B-body LeSabre two door (below) would have to be the donor car.
The 77-78 Riv ended up a very changed vehicle from the controversial, but well received notchback evolution of the “boattail” car that preceded it (below). The’75/76 was big and thirsty, but it had some of the classic styling cues that distinguished it from the obese Thunderbirds and too generic Cordobas of its day. To my eyes, it had character, and I could discern the theme that the designers were trying for, but it had to grow on you. It had done a steady 20,000 or so retail units a year during most of its life cycle, but the enormous tooling and engineering costs of the crash downsizing program called for a higher return on investment to sustain the car’s place in the lineup.
As was usually the case with a new Riviera generation, sales got a bump in the first model year from loyal Riviera buyers (by about 6,000 units) and then dropped off again as the sales force had to win “conquest” sales from rival makes. Prices reflected the intractable inflation of the malaise era, with the MSRP of the Riv up about 10% over the notchback/ boattail. The base car stickered at $7,357.
Those conquest sales were tougher to come by because the new personal luxury coupe in one end of the showroom looked too much like the accountants’ dream car at the other. Buick stylists had made some tweaks to the square cut lines of the LeSabre to soften the curves and give the Riv a more formal bearing.
The rear quarter opera windows were in the kicked up, “coke bottle” genre and, as was the case with previous Rivieras, there were no portholes out front. The wheelbase was fractionally less than the LeSabre and overall weight was down dramatically (by about 650 pounds) compared to the boattail. The grille treatment was almost bolt upright on the Riv (and evocative of the “toothy” grill of 49-52 if you used your imagination). The LeSabre had a more diagonal, slanted look forward of the front bulkhead.
Another factor that probably affected sales was the constant leaking of concept sketches, renderings and spy photos of the radical new front drivers that GM had planned. Some buyers also kept a wary eye on the economy, as rising inflation pushed up interest rates on new car purchases. Combine that with rising sticker prices, and the phrase “sticker shock” became a part of the late ’70 vernacular.
The big difference between the LeSabre and the its linemate was the wider choice of engine sizes: Buyers of the former could choose a V-6 and three V-8’s . For the upmarket Riv, it was a 350 V-8 from Buick, or an Olds 350 or an Olds 403. One premium option that set the Riviera apart from its donor car was available four wheel disc brakes. GM’s Turbo-Hydramatic three-speed drove the rear wheels for all.
The cabin was in keeping with the times, featuring crushed velour seats , a “burled walnut look” dash and power everything. This was near luxury territory, circa 1977.
The new look was cleaner and by no means unattractive, but the overall package was just too close to the LeSabre to make the car a true blue new model. It was just too obvious that they shared the same innards. This kind of mistake has been a hardy perennial at GM since…Well, forever.
The short model cycle and the passage of time have made these downsized Rivieras uncommon in the here and now, although you regularly see them at estate sales. If you spot a two tone silver/black factory paint job, you’re looking at a Buick LXXV anniversary edition. These cars, (to me anyway), make excellent budget collector cars because mechanical parts are a breeze, they were solidly built with quality probably a cut above the norm for what was a tumultuous and confusing time in the auto business.
The final factor on collectability is harder to quantify: These tended to be bought by the well to do and older well to do buyer. They are much more likely to have led pampered lives than the workaday LeSabres and Electras. I’ve seen half a dozen for sale on Craigslist with less than 100K on the clock that are all done at $4,500, but you will see the occasional dreamer list a clean car for $12,000. That’s insane money for a tarted up LeSabre.
The legacy of this generation Riviera is a mixed one. The E body car that replaced the placeholder Riv was a smash for Buick in ’79. (It even won the Motor Trend Car Of The Year award). Sales marched smartly upward also, more than doubling to over 52,000 units.
The FWD platform gave the Riv a new lease on life, but that lease expired when the Riv was dropped after the last 1999 model rolled off the line. Shifting consumer tastes and GM’s cynical body sharing programs had diluted the meaning of “personal luxury” as we now understand the term.
The Skylark and Regal were out; they would have been such obvious badge jobs……
No, GM would NEVER do such a thing.
My maternal grandmother’s last car was a ’78 Buick LeSabre Coupe, 350-powered, painted black with a white vinyl half-roof and opera windows. She went to the dealer seeking a Riviera, but when she saw that an optioned-up LeSabre was pretty much identical and for substantially less money she made her choice. I’ll bet GM lost a lot of lucrative sales that way. Considering there hadn’t been a “real” Riviera since ’73 (the hideous chopped off boattail that debuted in ’74 was widely seen as a laughingstock, looks *slightly* better today without the recent boattail for context), one wonders what the heck they were spending their time doing at GM. Oh right, they were busy wasting all their time and huge amounts of money on the X-body fiasco…
Let me tell you something son. I owned a 1977 Buick Riviera that I purchased used in 1980. To this day, I miss that car. Obviously, if it was your grandmother who owned one, I assume you are relatively young. Perhaps 20 something? Maybe early 30 something? You do not understand the tastes of the time. My car was universally complemented and admired. Everyone said things like “wow, this is practically a Cadillac”, or “boy, you must be doing well for yourself to own such a beautiful car”…! The list of compliments went on and on. Not a single person ever said “oh, this is just a transition car”, or,” oh yes, this is that LeSabre based Buick”! It isn’t your fault. You simply cannot understand the era. Yes, it was big. Yes, it had a soft, soft, ride. Yes, it did tend to guzzle gas. But hell son, it just oozed luxury and class. It was the kind of car young men of the time aspired to own. Who knows, 4 decades from now, perhaps people will be judging the new for 2016 Cadillac CTS-V with distain. It could happen. Just think about it!
I would have been about 12 or 13 years old when those ’77-’78 Riviera’s were introduced. I really didn’t put much thought into the LeSabre connection until now, and I even loved that “square” LeSabre Sport over our ’77 Monte Carlo but I couldn’t help but say as a kid “That’s not a Riviera. What did they do to it?”. I understand now. It was just filling a gap. If I were only 40 years old at the time, I very well may have done the same as his grandmother and decked out a LeSabre. Actually, I know I would have.
Hallo, Im speaking from Spain. i went to San Diego to live for studyng there in 1991 (sorry for my english) and I could buy this marvellous car, a Buick Rivera 78 (i can remember). Today is the day that I still remember this car, like the best car I ever had
This is not only a car, it is much more.. The soul of this Buik I never found here in Europe.. I could buy in my times in the States, a european car, but they dont have the spirit of leyend that this Buik and another americans cars have.
You are very lucky to could find a Buick Rivera like mine in USA, still now, because here in Spain is imposible..
Best regards everybody
I love this comment. I’ll never sell mine and its my daily driver (see below).
I own 1 myself Dad old car still ride like she’s new 51k miles on it and I drive anywhere
Even now it would be hard for me to chose between the LeSabre coupe of that era and the Riviera coupe if faced with both at the same time. If the Riviera had the 403V8 that would be the deciding factor.
Dan, the 403 was a downsized, detuned-for-smog version of the 455. Pretty much a boat anchor, nothing to recommend it over the 350.
The aftermarket is stronger for the 403.
The 403 was not a detuned-for-smog version of the 455.
It was a “small block” Olds engine that shared nothing with the 455 and was made only from 1977 – 1979.
I stand corrected. Long ago I read somewhere that the 403 was a detuned 455 and always believed it since, so thanks for the correction!
No sweat, Btrig.
Curious as to why you would think it a “boat anchor”. Compared to today’s powerhouse engines? I would agree. But that’s an apples and oranges comparison.
In its day in the late seventies the 403 was considered a really strong engine.
Pretty sure that’s the same 403 (6.6 Liter) engine that went into the 1979 Pontiac TRANS AM with automatic transmissions.. (The manual shift 4 speed got you the Pontiac 400 T/A engine)
If it were to stay relatively stock the 403 would be the way to go for sure. With 320 ft/lb at 2200 RPM they were real pullers.
Right guys, if you give me the choice between torque and horsepower, I’ll choose torque every time. American’s talk hp but they drive torque.
The Buick 350 isn’t as strong in the torque department as the 403, but it isn’t a slouch either. It had a very long 3.85in stroke and was rated at 275ft-lbs @ 1800 RPM. I’ve never personally driven one though, so I’m not sure how it feels on the road.
Plus, it would be a Riv/LeSabre with a real Buick engine, which one may or may not care about.
I had a 1978 LeSabre Custom as my personal driver over a year. It was loaded with everything but sunroof, red with white vinyl top and white vinyl interior. Got it with 72,000 km on it for $4200 in 1985, which was top dollar for that car at the time.
It had a Buick 350 and it made loads, and I mean LOADS of torque. You would never feel it would need more. The block was huge and it looked like a 455 at casual glance. It would not rev at all, perhaps 3000 rpm was all it was comfortable with. It was really a great driving car with huge space, great driving dynamics (it had HD suspension) and all my friends loved it. The GM cassette deck even worked great. Then, after a year, I sold it to the taxi company and bought a 1986 Jetta, purportedly to save gas. The follies of youth yet again.
I have also spent a lot of wheel time with the Olds 403 and you would never notice the difference in daily driving. The Buick would eke out about 15 mpg (US gallons) in mixed driving and the Olds 403 could barely make 12 mpg. The 403 was simply not worth the extra cost to buy and fuel, which accounts for why so few were sold.
This from your Self Proclaimed B Body Guru.
My Dad bought a 78 Estate Wagon with the 403. It replaced a 72 Estate Wagon with a 455. The 403 was much quicker. I t could spin the wheels from a standing start, nothing the 455 could ever do.
These were too generic in many ways, but they were a welcome improvement over the obese 1971-76 generation. GM’s large personal-luxury cars from those years were bloated, overstyled and cramped. Even with all of that weight, the structure felt very flimsy and cheap.
These Rivieras did lack character, but they were better cars in every way when compared to the prior generation. Of course, the 1979 Riviera was a home run in every respect, so these cars were quickly forgotten.
ok. i had no idea that there was a lesabre coupe. i thought lesabre was the sedan and riviera was the coupe. talk about model overlap…
Riviera was not merely “the coupe”, but was intended to be a higher level of luxury — the Cadillac of Buicks. That’s why this model was such an abject failure, it broke the model which had been established in ’63. When the E-body version (sort of) restored the original marketing model, Riviera was once again a success.
It is an interesting question why Buick went this route instead of squeezing a couple more years out of the 74-76 model. Cadillac kept the big Eldo in production through 1978, and I always presumed that the Riv shared the same platform. A little money spent on a facelift would have probably yielded the same result as this car.
I agree with Geeber that the 77-78 Riv was a much better car in structure and materials than the prior model, but it was certainly not going to tempt anyone out of a Mark V. It is an attractive car to my eye (as much as any of that B body generation), and I would take one over a comparable LeSabre. But I probably would not have if buying new.
With the dropping of the pre-downsized B-&C Bodies, there was no longer a suitable rear-drive platform for the big Riv. It probably would have been to costly to transfer it to the front-drive Eldo-Toro platform for only 2 years, plus that might have diluted the dramatic impact of the all-new ’79 model.
That’s what I was trying to figure out, why didn’t they just squeeze a couple of more years out of the current body? I had to read a couple of paragraphs twice and picture the ’78 Eldo’s and Toronados to make sure I had my mind right. I mean, the ’77 Monte Carlo and Grand Prix was more distinctive personal luxury than this Riviera. I think they should have done a facelift for those 2 years, I’ll bet they’d be collector cars today.
Two reasons. 1. Poor sales of the 74-76 models couldn’t justify Buick keeping the Riviera unchanged for 1977 against downsized LeSabres and Electras. 2. The impending demise of the Buick 455 after 1976 left Flint having to find a new engine – the remaining Buick V8, a 350, was too small for this 5,000-pound car so Buick would have to source a larger engine from another division to make standard equipment including Cadillac’s 425 (unlikely), Oldsmobile’s 403 (availability could not be assured if there was strong demand for these Rivieras – Olds was having to make that engine available to Pontiac for its hot-selling Grand Prix and Trans Am), or 400s from Chevrolet and Pontiac (both banned from California due to inability to meet emission standards). By downsizing the Riviera to the B-body LeSabre, Buick could make Flint’s own 350 standard in 49 states with the Olds 350 the base for California and the 403 available as an option in all 50.
It likely also depended on the factory in which they were assembled. Was it switching to the downsized B/C body? GM must have wanted to assemble all three E bodies in one plant to save costs. Did they ever? Or were they afraid a single plant strike would take them out of entire market segments?
I always liked the Le Sabre a bit more, I think the greenhouse was a bit cleaner than the “Riviera” opera window style.
They all kinda come to life with a set of Cragars and a bit of a drop in stance.
All this car does is make the ’79 look AMAZING by comparison.
“Dedicated to the Free Spirit in Just About Everyone.”
What is this I don’t even
I just want to point out that the ’77-78 wasn’t the first Riviera to be based on the standard Buick. They all were, to a greater or lesser extent! Even the ’63-65 had a very similar dash (with console added). The boattail was based on the LeSabre B-body and even shared windshield and I’m not sure what other parts. Obviously more was shared on the ’77-78, though. I agree with the commenter above that I like the LeSabre better for ’77-78 — the big quarter window is cleaner and more modern, and I always favored the unique look of the slanted front end. The one to get is the ’79 “Palm Beach” special edition which, now that I think about it, was probably created to appease buyers who were looking something like the ’77-78 Riviera after the shocking new front-driver ’79 came out.
Exactly. Here’s the Palm Beach for direct comparison to the yellow and white Riv that led off this post. Note how it looks much more lithe and sporting than the blocky, baroque Riviera. I have always thought the 1977-79 LeSabres were the best looking GM coupes of the post-1977 era (and the 1972 LeSabre is the best of the 1971-76 generation).
I happen to have one of those ’77 estate sale Rivieras under 65K miles with the rear disc brakes. Yes, the car is a glorified Le Sabre in many aspects, however, it has a much more commanding presence inside and out. The interior borrows heavily from the top of the line Electra, where the ’77 Le Sabre looks spartan otherwise. The car handles better than its standard issue sibling thanks to a much beefier torsion bar up front. As far as appearance goes, which is purely subjective I know, I find the B-body Riv to be the one of the more attractive GM B-body models produced from ’77 to ’79.
To sum it up, the “bridge” Riviera is an interesting and unique anomaly. I wouldn’t call it a unsuccessful.
Your point is well taken. I too, believe that these are good looking cars (although as you mentioned,that’s pretty subjective). I guess my point about being unsuccessful relates to the short model run and the lazy GM badge engineering that these represent. Riviera’s (to my mind) were supposed to be better than that. They were supposed to be a car that set their owners apart from the folks that bought LeSabres and other models. I just felt like this one broke that tradition.
Again, you speak from the heart with a good point of view.
I came very close to buying a silver-gray 78 Riviera with the 403 about 7 years ago. It looked just like the one in the Buick ad. What a great car that was! I wish I had bought it, but a 74 Firebird Esprit in James Rockford’s color combo became my first “antique” collector car instead.
I’d still jump on the chance to pick up a nice Riv…it would have to be a 78 or 85 though.
I have a 77 Riv for sale in beautiful condition. Estate sale, father-in-law owned low mileage & have recent appraisal & pics if interested.
what was the going price of a 1977 Buick Riviera
A friend of mine had a 1979 Olds 98 Regency with a 403. Torque alone was not enough. Incidentally, it had required a complete repaint after about 5 years. In the mid-’80s, it wasn’t the slowest car on the road by any stretch of the imagination. It certainly wasn’t quick though. Horsepower is the rate work can be done. Torque is only important for people who can’t or won’t access an appropriate gear ratio. For those that can and do, horsepower is the determinant of performance.
The Riviera is a car whose beauty has varied more than most.
Am I right in thinking The Riviera was originally to be a small Cadillac, perhaps named “LaSalle”… when Cadillac passed it went next to Buick who Smartly jumped at the Challenge. 63 ~ 65 Classics I Prefer a Loaded 65 in Heather Lavender Firemist
I Think The Gran Prix was my Mother’s Compromise car, Like The Tbird was in place of a Mk 4 in 1973, in 63, she saw a Riviera Shortly after and Always wished hers looked like that, knowing the Riviera was 25% More Expensive she thought her car was better value.I Guess I Come from by no means poor, but very frugal parents. IMO the Riviera is a better car…
in 66 It looked like a Buick Toronado clone, but it Had a Tunnel & rear Wheel Drive, Nice Though, just fatter…not as High Level Somehow, especially inside
68 was gross IMO… 1970 Looked Lost, But a Wedge of Pie Cut Short yet LOng…
Then the Overly Gawdy Boattails which always seems Tinny, in its gapped fit. Like
a 2 Door American Reply to The French Citreons of the day….
74-76 I Liked The Styling, But It looked like a Swoopy version of The LeSabre Which must have purposely been made less attractive by comparison on the same chassis?
This Year It Was Not disguised by nearly enough from the Lesson LeSabre , Though Much Preferable at The Same Cost because It Is A Riviera… Not as a Cadillac Comparison,,, but The Best Caprice Classic Coupe $$$ caN bUY.
yET , On The other Hand, as is my Pattern. I Believe The survivor rate on these 45,000 or so originally are probable less that 5 %? Or Do You Think 10% or More?
ID Love To See The Survivor rate on All The Car Models Individually. Roughly anyway.
I Think Few of These, But EVEN FEWER TORONADOS have survived in general.
I Wanted all of These as a Kid. I Still Would Like The Smaller Riviera 1989 preferably or TORONADO TROFEO that Year. I Am Dying To read about The GM Premium Coupes Here at CC… My favorite site for CARS….
In High School I seem to Remember The Vice Principal at our HS driving the 75 Edition Black on Silver sided Riviera.
I STILL Would Like To own a Buick Riviera Convertible 1985 Red,
but I’d gladly settle for this if it is cheap, We Loved our 79 Caprice Classic Which Had a better Window in the back, but it Rumbled by the time I came along.
My Mother’s last car, in 1984 She Traded her 73 Black T Bird in on a 1984 Riviera
Red Velour Interior, cheaper I guess by a 1000$ … fm Cassette I Doubt CD…it was as Base As Rivs came Metallic med Red….
Unfortunately Mom barely put 1000 miles on her new beauty, before she passed.
Dad Soon after sold it to a neighbor widow for $13k vs its 21 cost new with taxes.
Hmm. I remember these cars. A high school girlfriend’s family had a bunch of Buicks, particularly from this era. Her mother had a 78 LeSabre Sport Coupe, it was a two door, silver with lots of black matte trim painted. Which signified sporty car back then. Her grandmother had the 77 Riv, but I only ever saw the outside of that car. I, too fall into the category of the folks who like the LeSabre better. It seemed a more harmonious design…
A couple of friends had 76-77-ish Regal coupes with the Buick 350’s back in the late 70’s/early 80’s while my (to be) wife had a 77 Olds Delta 88 Holiday with 403 + 4 bbl. The Delta would run, RUN! away from the Regals, no problem. This was the same engine in the automatic-equipped Pontiac Trans Ams back during that time, too.
Who knows, maybe different states of tune, rear end ratios… They all make a difference.
This was just a poorly disguised Le Sabre Sport Coupe, Gussied up(Love That term!)… To hold the Rivieras place in the Lineup until 1979.
They should have gone to a bit more trouble. IMO.
The pic of the blue LeSabre coupe is actually the 1980’s restyled version, not the 77-79, which was used for the ‘two year wonder’ Riv.
Also, 1970 was the last Riv based on Eldo/Toronado E body, before the 1979 merger.
Loved the Buick 350’s. We had a ’77 Century that my dad bought used in 1980, and while the interior was plain, it was a great car to drive. My dad had HD shocks and springs put in, and it handled very well for a car of its size. It wasn’t bad on gas either, and was a much better car than the ’78 Cutlass we had at the same time. The Century could leave it in the dust, and the build quality of the Cutlass left a lot to be desired. The paint flaked off, the interior was sloppily built, and the radio never worked properly.
From the pictured ad:
“[The 1977 Riviera] is a very special automobile. Because it carries on a very special tradition. Something you’ll never really grasp, until you get that *available* leather steering wheel in your own two hands…”
I nominate this as a finalist in the ads that best embody the innocent, crass–and, today, adorable–cynicism of the Brougham Era.
I also love the line “instruments set in what LOOKS LIKE polished burled walnut” LOL
Having worked in the service department in a very large Buick dealer from 77 to 83, I always thought that the 77/79 Lesabre especially the coupe was an excellent design. Very long lived and many survived long past their other B body siblings. The 77/78 Riviera, while based upon it had a better presence up close and riding in one was much more luxurious. I would put it ahead of the Deuce. I would gladly like to find one of those “estate finds”. Oh, if you do like that era of Lesabre for heavens sake avoid v6’s except turbos and don’t even look twice at a 301 Pontiac in a B body unless the trunk is full of diamonds. They were slugs in nice clothing.
My first car was a 1977 Buick Riviera. Although the GS model was not specifically available that year, the car was equipped like one in dark red metallic, red velour 50/50 split seats, tri-spoke steering wheel, rally wheels, dual exhaust, 4 way disc brakes, Olds 403 motor, and a few other things. It was a really nice car that was reasonably fast looked good rode good and wasn’t quite the land barge that the early one was towards the end. Yes it was pretty obvious it was a LeSabre coupe and I never faked it but it was very comfortable and a quality vehicle. I really loved the FWD E-Bodies the Olds, Buick and Cadillac having owned variants of all three over time.
The 403 was a good strong motor. Remember for 1979 they were put into TransAms and even outperformed the 400 Pontiac.
I’ve owned a 78 Riv since 1984. Sadly, I let it sit under roof for the last 7 years and the frame rusted out, so its heading to the scrap yard. Everything on it still worked.
These were actually very comfortable cars to ride in. They handled reasonably well, and with a 350X Buick motor, they had sufficient zip for the time they were built.
Yes, they were upscaled LeSabres, but they were very roomy and you could easily take a foursome golfing and have no trouble putting in golf clubs. The interiors were more substantial and the suspensions were tighter than the LeSabres.
I do have a 95 and a 97 Riv. They are quite comfortable too, but don’t quite isolate you
from the road to the same extent. You can squeeze 4 sets of golf clubs in those, but it isn’t as easy. The supercharged V6s are much quicker, especially the 97 with the Series II 3.8liter.
Whenever I go to an ROA (Riviera Owner’s Association) meet, you rarely see any of these. They’re as rare as the 74-76s. The dominant entries are the 63-73s (because those are babied) and the 95-99s (because they’re cheaper to run and are still usually
functioning near 100%).
If nothing else I enjoyed owning this 78 because it was more of a rarity.
Ugh! Are you near NC? If so, sell it to me! If you’re not, at least save the steering wheel off of it or send me a PM on V8Buick or classicoldsmobile or performanceyears or e-bay if you’re a member. My handle is the same everywhere.
Thanks a bunch. I’ve got a home for pretty much all the drivetrain & would probably re-use most of what’s left over. Not looking to make a buck…but hate to see this stuff disappear.
Thanks a bunch.
To Junqueboi:
I’m in Central Pennsylvania. I need to hear from you very quickly if this is of interest to you. Depending on where you are in NC, it usually takes about 6 hours to get to the VA-NC border.
Bob
Hi,
This is Ray Knott, Director of the Riviera Owners Association with over 2,900 members world-wide. Next year we will celebrate or 30th anniversary. Bob Steinberg just made me aware of this blog. Bob was correct in his earlier posting, we seldom see these models at our shows. I’ve enjoyed the photos and the comments posted.
Personally I love the 1977-78s. I owned a LXXV several years ago and found it to be the most comfortable Riviera I’ve ever driven. I am currently contacting our members trying to solicit showcase features on these models.
If interested in knowing about the ROA visit http://www.rivowners.org.
Ray
When I was 12 my Dad got a ’78 LXXV Riviera. It was the most beautiful car he ever owned & one that I wish I owned today,
Hello all 1977-78 Riviera owners,
I am from Hungary Europe and having one of these and love it! Mine was a one owner car and I bought from Georgia, 3 years ago. Luckily I haven’t had any problem with it so far. I know most people fancy about the boat tail but for me this is a coolest riviera. I always wanted this type and finally I have got it now. They are my two babies 🙂
Best Laszlo
Hello!
Very interesting to read the article and all the comments. I live in Norway and I have a beautiful Riv LXXV with a 350. I like most american cars, but the one I have is very rare – I never see it on the road or in meetings here in Norway. I use it in the summertime and I have no problems with the car. The quality is just great. Here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzDVsRENwzY
Anders
Anders
That is indeed a rare & beautuful car! My father bought one new in 1978 & I loved that car… wish I still had it!
Hello. I also live in Norway, and for 5 years ago I had a 1977 Riviera as a daily driver. Buick 350 and loaded with options. This is the most reliable and comfortable car I’ve ever have owned. The Buick 350 wasn’t fast, but it was extremely quiet, smooth and reliable.
Today my daily driver is a 1977 Cadillac Coupe DeVille, but I’ve to say, the 77 Riviera rode much better, quieter and used a lot less gas. I think the 77/78 Riviera has to be one of the best of the GM B and C -body for 1977 ->.
Bought a 77 in 79. Drove it 10 years. Silver blue. Loved the car. Drove from s Carolina to California several times.
I never understood why these cars sold in low numbers, I thought these Riviera’s were a lot better than the mid 70’s Riviera’s and were the best looking of the full sized Buick coupes, I do see this era of the Riviera’s more often than the ones that preceded it, I do agree they looked more similar to the LeSabre.
my baby is a 1978 buick riviera 7th anniversary lxxv in almost prefect condition Except the interior. Many pieces are missing so I think.
If anyone has detailed pictures or a list of what trimming, headliner and such looks like I would be great full to get them.
I have included a picture. I am missing everything the goes on the headliner area and trimming. All dash and anything below ashtray level is in prefect condition
Please email proofoflife.taylorreish@gmail.com
For comparison the Olds 403 made 185 horses and 320 LBS FT of torque and the Buick 350 made 155/280 at equally low RPM’s. Down low either engine makes good torque but the 403 shines in the higher RPM’s. These engines made a huge and sharp contrast to the 307’s from 1980 on up in the E-body cars. The best E-body Riviera I drove to date was a 1979 with the Olds 350 V8. That thing just pulled and pulled and didn’t seem to run out of steam.
My folks bought a ’77 Riv and enjoyed it for 4 years. I bought an ’80 new and chose the turbo v-6 which blew up at 39K miles…..
Hallo, Im speaking from Spain. i went to San Diego to live for studyng there in 1991 (sorry for my english) and I could buy this marvellous car, a Buick Rivera 78 (i can remember). Today is the day that I still remember this car, like the best car I ever had
This is not only a car, it is much more.. The soul of this Buik I never found here in Europe.. I could buy in my times in the States, a european car, but they dont have the spirit of leyend that this Buik and another americans cars have.
You are very lucky to could find a Buick Rivera like mine in USA, still now, because here in Spain is imposible..
Best regards everybody
Is that your Buick in San Diego? If so, that’s a 1975 or 1976, which is a bigger and nicer car than the 1977.
This is what you had; https://www.curbsideclassic.com/uncategorized/cohort-sighting-1976-buick-riviera-love-hangover/
Yes, thats my Buick Rivera.. You probably are right, could be 75, its long time ago and I dont remember well..
That picture was made in Tuckson, Arizona.. I met a very nice girl in San Diego, she talled me to go to see her, and in a few weeks I went.. This is me in her house.. We didnt have in that time Iphones, but we had great cars..
A little late to the party here, but… My uncle owned a salvage yard and he had a ’78 Riv, powder blue with a white top, absolutely mint body and interior, but the 403 ci. Olds had a cracked block. I fell in love with it. I replaced the engine with another mildly built 403 from a totaled out Trans-Am, added a shift kit to the turbo tranny, replaced the factory wire hub caps with a set of original Buick road wheels and white walls, and I was on cruising street. Not bad for $800…
That’s awesome … I have a 78 buic lxxv and the block has holes and it might of busted the crank shaft and blown out sum rods where or how can I find another lxxv 403 engine.. I need and want this..
CAN SOME ONE ASNWER MY PRAYER
I’ve owned many different cars but the ’77 Riv I currently drive is my favorite. I cant really explain exactly what it is.. it’s so comfortable, well behaved, quiet and yes, stylish! I get comments all the time and people asking if I’m selling it. I am not. I know if I let it go I’m going to regret it because ones that are in great original condition are very hard to find.
I owned a ’77 in the mid 1980’s, it was a great car.
I purchased my 1977 Riviera w/403 from my grandparents in 1986, drove it through my college days, parked it for a few years then in 1999 pulled it back out and used it as our get a way car when my wife and I got married. I still own the car and drive it occasionally in the country. Oh the memories that car holds and the stories it could tell. Still looks great, rides like a dream and the distinct sound it makes as you close the doors is something you never hear from newer vehicles. No it is not for sale as I plan to pass it down to my daughter when she gets older.
Put a clause in your will that she can’t sell it if she wants to inherit your assets lol
I have owned a couple of 78 Riv’s over the years and loved everything about them. Mine both had the 403. I recently bought a 78 LeSabre Coupe with the 403. Not near as plush but prefer the quarter windows on the LeSabre Coupe.
That triple-white LeSabre is a dream! You must be proud.
Thanks! One minute you are bored looking at fb marketplace, the next you run across something like this you HAVE to have. 32k miles, bought from the original owner who loaded it up when they special ordered it in late 77.
Congrats on a very nice classic.
It is quite the looker.
Thank you!
This has been an interesting read, both the article and comments. I bought a year ago my -77 Riviera with 403 and only 12k miles. I have now added 1k more as it’s just an absolute joy and pleasure to drive. I’m the second owner and love everything about it.
I read some comments about the better build quality and I have to sign that. Even if many fancy the models up until -76, before the downsizing, I keep saying that these are far more better cars in every aspect. They are quiet and better built cars, option lists were long, that 403 is giving enough power, suspension is not limiting you from mild cornering, interior and trunk space is equal to, if not even bigger, previous land barge sized predecessors. I’ve owned and still own few other historical vehicles and this Riviera is growing into me more and more the more I drive it.
To me the comments about it being only re badged LeSabre is misleading. Yes, it shares styling cues and frame etc., but as someone already said, they are different cars in the way how they make you feel. That feeling isn’t coming only from the name plate at the trunk lid, it has to be something concrete, it has to be earned.
Evaluating the car now, after 4 decades, gives another perspective: what if the Flint engineers actually did a good job with their available tools and limitations? What if they were still able to squeeze in the personal luxury theme into this 2-year only Riviera? It’s easy to judge without ever owning one, but the more I read about people who really have owned one, I don’t see a single negative comment about it. Let that thought sink in for a moment.
I am looking for some front power bucket seats to buy from a 1977 Buick Riviera, suede/velour material, in descent working condition. Any help is greatly appreciated.
I prefer the Buick 350 over any Olds engine. It would have been great if Buick still offered their 455 (not to be confused with an Olds 455). In my 1970 Electra I get 18-19 mpg on the freeway at 70 mph. And the Buick 455 weighs only 50 lbs more than a Chevy 350. The Buick 350 weighs 100 lbs LESS than a Chevy 350.