Here at Curbside Classic, we have written up literally thousands of old (and not-so-old) cars photographed in habitats all around the world. I have, myself, been responsible for giving the CC treatment to a few hundred of them. And there have been few models that have been more popular subjects than the much-loved General Motors B body cars from the 1977-85 generation. So how can it possibly be that we have never given a 1977-79 Buick LeSabre its day in the spotlight?
As I have written before, I have taken to cruising through some of my older CC subject photos that I skipped over in my excitement or enthusiasm over something else. I still remember the day (my photos identify it as December 29, 2011) when I found this car in the parking lot of Castleton Square Mall in the northeast suburbs of Indianapolis. I remember being struck by the car’s excellent condition and by that clean pale yellow paint, and knew I had to stop and click off a few shots.
But even so, others were giving cars like this plenty of love and it was a bit out of my main zone of interest. So it sat. I never forgot about this car, but every time I thought about combing through my archives for something to write about, some other B body of the period came to the fore. But on looking now through the CC index, there is not one full CC of a 1977-79 LeSabre. Honorable mention should go to Joe Dennis who wrote about one (here) that he found on a walk through a college campus.
Up through my teens, I am not sure there was a single GM brand to which I had less exposure than Buick. Buicks were certainly seen on the streets of Fort Wayne, Indiana in fairly decent numbers, but they were virtually absent from my circle of extended family and friends. Pontiacs and Oldsmobiles were everywhere, and there was also a smattering of Cadillacs and Chevrolets. But Buicks must have been for “other people”, though I am not sure who those other people were.
It is not like it really mattered to me. By the fall of 1976 I could not have been less interested in cars built by General Motors. I had been given an overdose of them through extended family and the families of several friends, and I was intoxicated by a love that dare not speak its name (Chrysler). There was also a lingering affection by products of the Ford Motor Company, which would soon become requited in a particular 1967 Ford Galaxie 500 convertible that would show up in my driveway in the early months of 1977.
In the decades since I have become a fan of the GM B body of this generation, particularly the ones from the first three years of 1977-79. Each of the versions of that car had a unique flavor – especially the 2-door models. At the time I thought that Oldsmobile carried off the look best overall, with a solid, businesslike look that was modern but conservative. The Pontiac was like that one friend of your mother – the lady with the outsized personality who wore loud outfits and too much jewelry. I was disappointed in the Cadillac, which didn’t look as Cadillacky as it should. And keeping my membership in the Contrarian Club in good standing, I continue to give Chevrolet a big shoulder shrug and wonder why the coupe’s roof was the only actual styling done to an otherwise nondescript car.
Buick? I had terribly mixed feelings about these. The front 2/3 of the car looked great. The grille was quite nice, as were the wheel openings that suggested forward motion. The coupe roof (shared with Pontiac) was also nice and it came off as the sportiest of the bunch – especially with Buick’s great road wheels. But then there was that tail end. It was as though the styling team ran out of time, money or both after they got past the rear wheel cutouts. “OK Bernie, I guess we will just have to smooth it off and toss some taillights on. It will have to do.” Even the Chevy’s tail end had more personality than the Buick’s plain, droopy butt.
I finally got to experience one of these LeSabres when it was quite new after I went to work for a big funeral home the summer I graduated high school. For someone into experiencing as many different cars as I could, that job was a bonanza. Beyond the four Cadillac funeral coaches (two 1977 models and two 78’s) and the limo (’71 Cadillac) there were several silver sedans. All of the cars carried a two-digit number on a big key tag, which matched the two-digit number on each car’s license plate). Car No. 67 was a 1976 Buick Electra 225. There was also car 33, a 1977 Cadillac Fleetwood. That Fleetwood, with its 425 V8 would really scoot. When I would get sent somewhere in a sedan, the manager (a good guy named Al) would tell me which car to take. I always scowled to myself when he would start his sentence with “Take 71 and go to . . . . ” Because car 71 was a 1977 or 78 LeSabre sedan with a V6.
I was excited the first time I got to drive it, because the car magazines had spilled much ink on Buick’s new (though old) V6 engine. I don’t know what I was expecting, but what I got was the slowest car I had driven in a long time. How slow was slow? I had spent lots of time in my mother’s 74 Pontiac Luxury LeMans with its dog of a 2 bbl 350. And the 2 bbl 390 in my 67 Galaxie was no race engine. There was also the car my best friend drove frequently, a 1973 International Scout with an AMC 258 six and an automatic. But this Buick was in an entirely different league. Keeping up with traffic from a stop light required full throttle. It was like my father’s boat with its 55 horsepower Johnson outboard trying to pull a skier out of the water with the rest of the family aboard and watching. I will confess to being more of a lead foot in those days, but that V6 Buick instilled in me an intense dislike for a species that would become increasingly common: the large, underpowered car.
Fortunately, Buick built many of these with an assortment of V8 engines built by an assortment of GM’s Divisions: The Pontiac 301 (5.0), the Buick 350 (5.7) and the Oldsmobile 403 (6.6) almost certainly solved these cars’ worst feature. With a little torque available from under that pedal on the right, car no. 71 would have been a very pleasant place to spend time.
I did like the rest of the car quite a bit. It handled more nimbly than I was used to, and the finishes of its blue velour interior were quite nice. I especially loved the classic look of the dash – which I still think is the best dash out of all of the GM B and C body cars of this series. There were those who criticized Buick for putting the clock in front of the passenger. But it was plenty big to read from across the seat. And it didn’t bother me, because I could not recall anyone in my family who had a car with a functioning clock anyway, so I viewed a clock in the car as something to ignore. Except for that engine, I could see someone in his 40’s with a wife and a couple of kids being fairly satisfied with a car like this. Not me, of course, because the ’77 Chrysler Newport Custom owned by my best friend’s dad ruined my ability to fully appreciate this Buick. And the universe can play funny jokes on us, because I eventually found myself as a 40-something guy with a 2-door LeSabre in my own driveway – if only for three weeks.
Now, I can look at this Buick as a lovely period piece, especially in its Cream (code 50) paint and Buckskin landau roof and velour interior. If a guy had a plaid sport coat and a pair of white loafers, this car would be just the thing. About that landau roof: This is one mystery I have not been able to solve about this car. This is clearly a LeSabre Custom Coupe. But is it a LeSabre Custom Landau Coupe? The “Landau” label is in the rear side windows, but I can find no reference in Buick’s printed materials to a Landau model, or a Landau trim package. Were all 2-door LeSabres called Landaus? Was this a mid-year addition? Or a window from a newer car? Or was it a designer edition named for Martin Landau, the Hollywood star who died at the age of 89 in 2017? I have invested enough time looking into these possibilities (OK, except for the last one) and will leave it for the CC Commentariat to resolve.
The boring tail end no longer bothers me (much), and maybe I could even say the same of the glacial acceleration if this model is saddled with the V6. And even though I am not a yellow-car-guy, I can even appreciate that shade on a car like this. Hey, at least it’s a color. And has anyone noticed the window crank? Even Buick owners were not always eager to embrace power windows – because everyone knew in 1977 that “they are just one more thing to go wrong.” I love that the current owner has made some upgrades to the electronics, with a freshly fabricated console for a cutting-edge Garmin navigation system. Hopefully there was a jack for connecting an iPod – because no local stations were playing Barry Manilow, ABBA or The Bee Gees in late 2011.
This was another of many cars that found their ways into my phone camera’s view and which I never saw again. It might have found its way back to Palm Beach where cars like this were once so common. For this car to have survived its first thirty-something years in such fine condition, I am hopeful that a careful owner continues to pamper this lovely relic from the 1970’s.
That half-covered vinyl roof treatment was referred to as “Landau top” in the options section of the 1977 catalog, so the window stickers presumably were part of that selection. The full covering was referred to as “Long vinyl top”…
I too used to prefer the Oldsmobiles from this era over Buick but I’ve come to really like the Buick coupes. They look good in every trim. The profile view clearly has some Pinninfarina influence. This could be a 508 coupe scaled up to American size. To my eyes Chevy tied with Buick for the best looking sedan.
Agreed on the droopiness of the rear end eroding the overall look. It makes me think of the old question about whether some cars were more aerodynamic when in reverse.
Thinking about it, there were no B-body Buicks in my extended family, either, except for one. Otherwise the rest (primarily on my mother’s side) were Chevrolets or Oldsmobiles, often diesel powered Delta 88s which gave mixed levels of service. The sole exception was an ’84 or ’85 LeSabre my mom’s younger brother had. I wrote up a CC about an ’84 LeSabre years ago where I mention him and his being 25 when he bought it new.
While this yellow is not a color I would have ever chosen, I’m glad to see it. But doesn’t it seem that sometimes the odd colored cars are the ones that survive? I’ve seen several Buicks of this color and vintage over the years, just only getting pictures of one.
I’m amazed that we haven’t have a full CC on these LeSabre coupes. These are probably my favorite B-body coupe. I think the rear end’s “droopiness” gives the car an assertive, ready-to-pounce stance, like a German shepherd (or a hyena, but I prefer to think of German shepherds instead).
There’s a ’79 LeSabre coupe that I see occasionally around here. The picture below is about 5 years old, but I saw it again this year, so it’s still running. Not nearly in the pristine shape as your cream car here.
Oddly enough, I just saw this Buick less than 24 hours after I wrote this comment, so it’s still running!
What an amazing find, even if its discovery was from thirteen years ago. I liked your characterizations of the various GM B-bodies (LOL @ Pontiac!), but to my tastes, that 1977 – ’79 generation of Coupe DeVille is darned near at the top of any Cadillac I would want to own as part of my fleet.
As for this car, I love its paint and color scheme – it looks like frosted banana cake with that interior! I also get that you’re saying about the somewhat nondescript rear styling. I had read Paul N.’s essay in which (IIRC) the styling inspiration was a particular Pininfarina design. I can see it, but I agree that the rear looks as much like that car as the Granada looks like a Mercedes.
I’m a Flint kid, so I’ll always be Team Buick.
Probably worth a mention the 77-78 Rivera which had to compete with the LeSabre in the same showroom – talk about awkward.
The Rivera I am sure would cost more but had a bit more styling touches. I bet someone was told to tone down the LeSabre so it wouldn’t cannibalize Riv sales at least until the new FWD Riv came out in 79. For a lot of people, those 79s looked much better and offered better winter drive-ability.
No article on the ’77 downsized big GM cars should fail to credit Pininfarina’s Fiat 130 Coupe for its huge styling influence on them, and the LeSabre coupe was of course the one that was most faithful to it.
Don Andreina did a superb styling analysis here:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-european/curbside-classic-1972-77-fiat-130-coupe-bill-mitchells-regards/
If you thought that the V6 was slow, there was an optional “Lesabre Highway Economy Package” that included a “specially tuned V6, recalibrated automatic and a lower 2.56 rear axle ratio”. But they warn that “this is not geared for in-city driving”. I guess so.
Maybe the one you drove had it?
If I hadn’t already known about landau vinyl tops, absolutely my first guess would have been that it was a “special edition” like the Bill Blass Continental…except in this case named for Martin Landau and his iconic portrayal of Rollin Hand, secret agent and master of disguise.
I’ve been a Buick guy for many years. My first “experience” with one was when my oldest brother and his wife got a 1985 Park Ave. My parents were so impressed, that they too ended up with a 1985 PA. From there, my family blew up with Buick as the most popular brand in the family. I started selling them in 1988, so that helped. Sadly today, not one in my family or myself drive a Buick. Why? For me, no sedans and I think that may be why Buick sales are what they are today.
About that back end. I also agree with it looking like they ran out of time or interest. In certain trims/colors, it wasn’t as bad. But I think the 1980 was the year they addressed that. I think one of the most interesting of this era? The “Palm Beach” edition in the yellow and white. Very interesting car.
That rear end always reminded me a bit of the Peugeot 504 sedan with it’s oddly beveled-off trunk. Do love me some Peugeot though, and with time the Buick no longer strikes me as quite so strange.
My dad had one of these ’79s. Light green sedan with light green vinyl roof- big V-8. The ’79s had a tweaked grille and new hubcaps- both improvements. The Caprice was closest to the original Italianate coupe sketch that produced the ’77-’79 look. The front, rear, and sides of the Chevy are dead ringers. The coupe roof appeared only on Buick and Pontiac. All of the other B- bodies were variations on the Caprice design. The B- bodies all had tapered trunks- maybe droopy in the case of Buick. Buick might have wanted to go with a more chopped off look, as seen on the ’86 Riviera. Still, I think the LeSabre comes in second after the iconic Caprice.
We had a low mile near-mint beige on beige ’77 LeSabre 4 dr as one of our daily drivers for a while when we lived full-time in Vermont in the early 2000s. The 350/350 combo was hard to beat, and such a comfortable car, but not exactly ideal for winters there so it was replaced by a Trooper after about a year. The ’77 Buick had replaced our wonderful ’78 Electra that we drove for 5 years every day, and the ’77 was our last American daily driver. Wish it were still possible to buy ’70s 4 doors like this in good condition for regular use, we did so for about 20 years and enjoyed driving them every day immensely, there’s just nothing like them for a comfortable commute, but those days are long over. Miss it a great deal, but being retired for some time at least we no longer have that commute.
The dash really retained the traditional Buick look. Three big silver dials, two in front of the driver, the third in front of the passenger. The look goes back to the late Thirties, and even exists in my ’97 Riviera, except for the round clock. Quality of the body build was just so- so back then, look at the poor fit of the left rear quarter panel extension. When I worked at GM it was a very rare car that had all the body joint lines in proper alignment.
Being a Buick guy, I have always favored the LeSabre coupe above all other variants of the 1977-79 B-bodies. Also, I had fallen in love with a Fiat 130 coupe displayed during my first visit to the Chicago Auto Show and was able to clearly see the resemblance a few years later when the downsized GM lines were introduced. I also felt the LeSabre looked best in subdued colors, in keeping with the European inspiration, as silver, black or dark blue seemed more evocative of Pininfarina. I remember that yellow and tan color combination on many GM cars of the time, and the comment about the plaid sport jacket and white shoes is on the mark!
I can certainly understand how the V6 was underpowered in any of the B-bodies, but its sluggish acceleration, miserly fuel consumption and rough idle would be exactly what my father would have chosen, had he been in the market for a Buick back then – best of all, it was the base engine, available at no extra cost! It seems you really had to be careful when specifying options in the 70s, as GM really did build some painfully base models back then.
A friend owned a LeSabre Palm Beach Edition. He liked the car except for not being able to cover the sun/moon roof.
Great find! In the end, it lacks the grace of Pininfarina’s Fiat 130 Coupe, given its full-size. And the visually, very heavy-looking bumpers. Plus, other tacked on ‘luxury’ elements. Like the chromed B-pillar trim, and the portholes.
Since the early 1960’s, GM was the most reliable domestic car maker, ensuring clean, and best commercial styling. Having this in mind, handling of the trunk-top styling, appears unusually weak.
Hey, JP, look what I saw last night before your article today. A 1979 for $6500. Stuck with the Pontiac 301. Seemingly last registered in 1997 based on state BAR.
Dash
Just to be sure…
My dad drove Buicks until 1985, when I was 19. My first car was a hand-me-down 77 Buick Estate Wagon. The Detroit Free Press printed the monthly, 10-day, and YTD auto sales figures as they were released. I remember my dad explaining the stability of Buick sales when Olds, Pontiac, and Chevrolet sales had significant declines: educated, middle-class people were more insulated from recessions. I don’t know if that helps explain who those “other” people were. My dad, from the mid 60s through the mid 80s traded one Buick Wildcat, Centurion, LeSabre for another every 1-4 years. He taught in a suburban Detroit public school district. Nobody special, but I guess he felt he was more secure than most.
I drove one of these once and it was a wallowing boat compared to the imports I was used to. I shudder at what the earlier and larger ones drove like.
Our 2003 LeSabre actually handles OK although it’s still a little floaty
If you (JP Cavanaugh) are ever in the Palm Springs CA area you should drive my 78 LeSabre Custom Coupe with a factory installed 403 V8. It will help erase that Buick V6 memory from your mind 😉
These 1977-79 LeSabre coupes are my favorite GM cars from the period. I always wondered why some had the 5×5″ bolt pattern wheels like the featured cars while others had the smaller bolt pattern wheels. As far as I know, those with the turbo V6 and Buick 350 and Olds 403 have the larger bolt pattern wheels and those with the Pontiac 301 have the smaller bolt pattern wheels there must be exceptions as the LeSabre Palm beach pictured in the comments apparently has the large bolt pattern wheels and Pontiac 301.
Is there anyone who knows the reason for the two different bolt patterns? O don’t think any wagons or C bodies had the smaller bolt pattern but coupes and sedans did.