(first posted 2/27/2018) The Continental Mark V seems to be a perennial favorite here at CC, with at least seven articles having been written about it, by my count. I find much to like about these cars, having written about one myself just last April. Given that much ground has previously been covered, the point of this article isn’t so much to restate what has already been said. Having rediscovered and been inspired by a CC post from 2016 that featured some of the incredible, night-time photography of Langdon Clay from the mid-1970s in New York City, I started to notice a certain similarity among many of the cars he had depicted so expertly. Many of these vehicles, though they would have been only a few years old at the time of being photographed, looked prematurely dented, rusted, or otherwise busted in some way. NYC traffic, across pretty much any decade, seems never to have been kind to the automobile.
I remember being eight years old in the mid-’80s and riding in a car from JFK airport to my Aunt Angie’s house out in Jamaica, Queens, and being shocked by the number of rolling heaps and gutted-out cars that lined the streets. Particularly haunting had been what appeared to be a ’74 or ’75 Chevy Vega hatchback that had been t-boned (badly) and just pushed to the curb to sit there, with its shattered windows and everything. I remember it looking like it had been sitting at that curb for a while.
Granted, that little Vega, up to that point, had “lived” an unusually long life (especially for a mid-run Vega) at eight years old or so in the borough of Queens, but many other vehicles I saw – both on the street at that time, and also as depicted by Mr. Clay – looked to be much newer and much worse for wear. It dawned on me that given the physically larger dimensions of many cars in the ’70s, combined with the stop-and-go nature of darting through city traffic, probably combined to make a lot of them age prematurely in that environment.
I had spotted our featured car about six-and-a-half years ago in Chicago’s Loop district while walking from work to an afternoon appointment. Opting for footing-it over taking a cab or the L to get from one end of the Loop to the other, I usually keep a pretty fast pace – unless something, like this Lincoln, stops me dead in my tracks. These cars are enormous – and simply striking in the metal. Long one of my favorites of the upper-crust personal luxury cars, I could wax poetic about their lines – but seeing that I’ve already done that, suffice it to say that these pictures don’t really do it justice.
The body was straight and clean, and its paint and vinyl were shiny. This led me to believe that its trip into the city on this day was probably not a regularly occurring thing. I can’t actually vouch for its model year, as I was unable to distinguish this one as a first-year ’77, a ’78, or a final-year ’79. What I do know is that for ’77, these cars came standard with a 179-horsepower, 400-cubic inch V8 (with a 210-hp 460 as an option) and weighed close to 4,700 pounds. As far as darting around in downtown traffic, this car isn’t going to be doing much of that. However, if elongated, articulated buses can move smartly enough among the cabs, bicycles, food trucks, and other regular, private passenger vehicles, this Lincoln can certainly do the same.
It had dawned on me that the modern-day prestige model in Lincoln’s lineup that would correspond to this Mark V might be the Navigator – a vehicle, as they might say, which is a horse of a different color. The Nav is a big, truck-based hauler of the premium ilk, while the Mark V is a long, low, wide expression of personal indulgence. My gosh, how I love the concept of the personal luxury car, with no trace of irony. In the ’70s, it was often about being the biggest, poshest, most extreme and wasteful private passenger car possible, just for the sake of style. One can actually use a Navigator for a host of things, including hauling people and things. This Mark V? Good luck even seeing out of those rear-quarter “opera” windows. If ever a car’s exterior dimensions screamed for a backup camera, it’s this one. How did people ever do it back then?
One of the styling features that had confounded me as a young child was the “Continental” trunk sculpting. I tell you the truth – when I was learning how to read a clock, I used to stare at the back of these cars and, in all seriousness, try to figure out how to “tell time” by what was going on back there. I mean, look at it… the artful way the “C O N T I N E N T A L” letters are arched across the top of that hump, and the central “Lincoln” emblem that covers the trunk lock has always looked like some kind of weird clock to me. One of my brothers still teases me when we happen to be around one of these cars, as he’ll ask me, jokingly, “What time is it?”
Anyway, even if this car wasn’t a perfect “ten” with just a few, little cosmetic things that could be attended to (the vacuum-operated headlamp doors stuck in the “open” position, a few, little nicks in the paint), it looked to be in fantastic condition. This would definitely not be my first choice of car to drive anywhere in the Loop. I can’t even imagine trying to change lanes in this thing.
As a rolling piece of sculpture, though, I’d gladly keep it around to occasionally tool around the area in the northern part of the Windy City. Lake Shore Drive would seem like just the kind of place to go for a cruise with one other person riding up front. Its lanes, just a little bit wider than those found on other main thoroughfares, would be just navigable enough for some classy, North Side cruising in what was once the fairest Lincoln of them all.
Downtown, The Loop, Chicago, Illinois.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011.
Related reading:
Well. This is one way to start off the day.
I’ve beaten the particular horse of my Mark V love to death, so I won’t reiterate it here. However, I must say that these photographs are great. Even with the snapped open headlight covers, you’ve captured the allure of what this vehicle is all about.
Although, one thing I’ve just had difficulty trying to rationalize is the idea of the Navigator being a modern day Mark V successor. Don’t get me wrong, I really like the Navigator, one of my favorite SUVs (with the exception of the first and current gen), but I just think that the Nav and the Mark are so fundamentally different that comparing them in a valid way is just tough. They both serve different functions that it’s like comparing apples to oranges. I understand the comparison, both are the top of the line products and both reflect the styles and trends of their respective eras, but both just have different goals in mind. In fact, I think that photo of the Navigator stretch limo is a perfect encapsulation of my point. There’s no way you could see a Mark V being used for mundane stuff like Limo conversions or Livery services, and its not because of the two doors, lack of third row, and reduced cargo capacity. It’s just not the image that car was made in mind for, it was made for a different sort of customer, one that I don’t think would go for a Navigator in today’s world.
Also, I don’t think I could differentiate the years of the Mark V. The only (possible) clue I would have is if someone popped the hood. As I know what the difference between the 400 and 460 looks like, and this coming from someone who’s obsessed with these.
I’m intrigued by your thoughts on the Navigator, and I’ve often debated the same thing. Both the Navigator and Escalade are arguably the only remaining “traditional” American Luxury vehicles on the market, but are they akin to the old high-end Personal Luxury cars like the Mark and Eldo?
My argument would be “yes” because the Navigator and Escalade represent the most extravagant expression of a popular body style. When 2-doors were huge (literally and sales wise), the Mark and Eldo were the most over-the-top coupes on the market. Today, SUVs are huge sellers, and once again Lincoln and Cadillac offer wildly overpriced and flashy big haulers. Sure, they haul stuff, and many are used as livery vehicles and family cars, so they are more practical than any coupe. But that’s what the market demands today. An Expedition, Explorer, Suburban, Traverse–all those are nicely trimmed and haul stuff–but the Navigator and Escalade scream “I can overspend for my functionality.” Similarly, back in the day, Cutlasses and Toronados and TBirds were very nice and did exactly what they needed to do, but they weren’t Marks and Eldos–those cars excelled at “overstatement” and “expensive.” So, I really do think that it’s fair to liken a Navigator to a Mark–they share the same philosophy, just applied to a different body.
Joseph (and GN), thank you for the thoughtful weigh-ins. The truth is that being a car person, I have struggled with the idea that the Navigator and Escalade – capable, luxurious and extravagant as they may be – are the successors to the Mark series and Eldorados.
Joseph, your sentence: “It’s just not the image that car was made in mind for, it was made for a different sort of customer, one that I don’t think would go for a Navigator in today’s world” has me asking that very question. Given that there are essentially no more personal luxury cars (as we knew them), I wonder what a Mark V owner in ’79, if they stepped out of a time machine in 2018, would go for in a new-car showroom today…
It really is a great question. If it was a true time machine, then the ’79 Mark V owner would probably be wondering what the hell happened…. luxury trucks, no coupes, Lincoln a shadow of its former self…. and they would probably want to go right back to 1979.
In terms of demographics/psychographics, I believe the Mark V owner was often a self made success, 40-something or 50-something, obviously affluent, lived in a fancy ranch house in the nice burbs and wanted an image statement car. Today a person with that same profile would probably live in a posh new McMansion and would drive a flashy SUV (imported or maybe domestic), since those are the image “cars” of today.
The original owner of any Mark V would be aghast to know that Lincoln or Cadillac would ever offer trucks in their lineup. The battleship was once the king of the U.S. Navy. Today it is the aircraft carrier. Same navy, times change.
It’s a very interesting question that my wife and I are actually asking ourselves right now. In ‘7x there is no question we would have been the exact target for a personal luxury car. Slightly later we probably would have been Saab buyers. At is is, we’ve had Minis for the last 6 years but are looking for something slightly larger. But living in a city giant trucks certainly don’t appeal to us, and most subcompacts aren’t nearly as nicely tailored as the Minis we’ve had. I understand we are a tiny demographic, but there’s not a whole lot out there. The Germans would seem to be right in our wheelhouse, but they’re just so… gauche, for lack of a better term.
You don’t like the current Navigator? I think it’s one of the nicest they have built
I find the side profile and back attractive and I really like the design of the interior, (those seats look comfy as hell). But, you get to that front end, and I just get such a strong visceral hate. The angry eyes and massive grille just clash so violently with everything else that I find it ruins the design. It may not seem like a big deal, but much like how the wrong wheels can ruin a design, a front end, especially a poorly designed or unattractive grille, can break a design for me. My strong, yet irrational hatred for that front end ruins the rest of the car for me, which is sad, because I really do want to like it more.
Fair enough – I like it all front end too – but yes a front end can ruin a particular car – I have irrational hate too – like the original Cadillac Eldorados – why? For the worlds ugliest steering wheels
Back when I was about 19, I went to visit my sister who lived about an hour outside NYC. One afternoon I decided to drive into the city, even though I had minimal experience at driving in a large city. I was amazed, a traffic light every 100 feet, or so it seemed, and every one of them red as you approached.
It took quite a while to find an on street parking space and I was really scared that I would wind up with dents to my car. I owned a fastback Mercury and you just could not see the rear fenders in the mirrors.
I currently drive a 09 Crown Victoria, and because cars are so much better to drive than they were 50 years ago driving in a crowded city is no big deal. Or maybe it is because I have more experience?
I think folks living in big cities might feel that dents, dings, and scratches are part of owning a car….especially if you don’t have any access to off street parking.
Or maybe what you saw in the 70s with all the bumps and bruises on cars was considered as part and parcel of car ownership, like the eventually rusted rocker panel of door bottom?
Great points. While I don’t think Chicago traffic is quite as intense as in NYC, I hasn’t escaped me that many cars that are street parked in my neighborhood either have bumper covers that have either been thrashed or those “bumper bully” things attached to the front and/or rear.
Back when I thought I was going to have to buy a car for a work commute, I had to let go of the idea that my street-parked car was going to remain as shiny and nice as I would want it to, given it would have regular exposure to traffic and elements.
I can imagine that your ’09 Crown Vic probably goes and stops well, given that they were the taxis of choice here in Chicago for years after I moved here.
It seems they all disappeared at once. Every other car on the street was a crown Vic and BOOM!
There was a taxi lot at damen and Churchill that used to be filled with 30 CVs at a time. Now when I go past I might see one or two old survivors.
I wonder if Uber coming in hastened their demise.
Great post and great pictures!
Big cities are indeed tough environments for cars, and in the U.S. New York City is arguably the toughest. I remember visiting there years ago as a kid and being blown away by how trashed the cars were–even the newish ones. I also remember how often you’d see abandoned, smashed, stripped cars by the side of the road, in groups or solo. That’s been cleaned-up a lot in more recent times, but it was definitely part of the NYC urban fabric back in the day.
The Mark was (and is) such a style statement (whether you love or hate that style, you can’t ignore the impact). One thing Lincoln did right with the car was craft a distinctive rear-end design–the spare tire “hump” was so iconic to the brand. I’m glad the designers kept a variation of the look all the way to the end of the Mark VIII, and didn’t bow to the “international” pressures for non-decorative design “purity.” However, I think the cars that carried the “hump” the best were these ’77 – ’79 models–just the right mix of crispness and the enormous proportions to effectively carry off the styling flourish of the faux spare.
Thanks, GN! Yes – for me, the Mark V had just the right amount of straight lines and curves, in the perfect balance. And to your point about “international pressures”, I have also always loved just how unabashedly “American” these cars are.
Guess I’m the only one here that does not like the Mark V. Love the Mark III/IV and yes even the (4dr only) Mark VI as well as the Mark VII, LSC or otherwise. But for some reason the V leaves me cold. I just don’t care about ’em.
Guy, you are not alone, the original 72 job without the federal bumpers, the one that Frank Cannon drove is by far the best and looks classy, I still like it today.
The Mk 5 just looks ugly to me, too many sharp edges and fiddly bits
I went to the 76 London Earls Court motor show with my grandfather, on the Ford stand was a white with red top Lincoln Continental Mk 4, I remember the huge bumpers, alloy wheels, and the rather fussy wheel arch and side trim. It looked totally different to any other countries entry. fascinating but the bumpers looked clumsy compared to the 72
I was in a Mercury/Lincoln showroom several times during 1971-72 and experienced, at an impressionable age, the new Mark IV up close. It was a rough transition esthetically for ’73, but not nearly as bad as what they did to the Torino and Gran Torino. How is it that the basic shape of the 1972 Lincoln Continental sedan and coupe front bumper was able to be preserved for ’73, but not that of the Mark IV?
I go back and forth on the question of whether the optional thin bumper bar in front of the ’72 grille is a good thing. Lately I like it because the unadorned grille is too square-proportioned. Also, no opera windows for me, just for the sake of elegance/simplicity.
Mark IVs with big bumpers did appear on Cannon, eventually.
Oh yes, I get young impressions. In 73 when I was 7 our next door neighbor brought home a Mark IV in all but name, a Thunderbird in Starfire Blue. Man oh man did that thing leave an impression on me! I liked it much better than his wife’s 68 Sedan DeVille.
I can agree with you about big cities. raised in NYC i’ve had many cars here and the city does take and put a toll on cars. i just took my BMW in for front end shakes and ended up with a $2600 bill for front and rear suspension work(this last winetr has been really brutal on the streets) i am now looking for a beater to get around in. the streets destroy your car here and no one pays you for the damage. the potholes left by this winter are enormous and really do beat the crap out of your car. the mark v is a beautiful car how did we manage to drive and park and whip these cars around???………….we drove what was made at the time and became better drivers for it!!!!
Perhaps one of the best post-war Lincolns with nary a bad angle.
Having owned a comparably sized 1975 Thunderbird with a 460, these would surprise a person on how nimble they were. Not stellar, but they could get out of their way much better than most realize. The torque of that 460 helped considerably with this.
Looking at this Lincoln, it reminds me I sometimes miss being able to see both corners of the hood of whatever I’m driving. It was a huge help in parking and other tight spaces. I’m not lamenting the disappearance of this trait but it was certainly helpful at times.
These were a huge styling improvement over the fat, bloated Mark IV and look best with a metal, non-vinyl roof. One thing I’ve noticed on a lot of Mark Vs is that the wind at highway speeds makes the top part of the front bumper between the guard flutter upwards.
I’m trying to remember if I’ve ever seen one of these Mark V’s without a vinyl roof… Regardless, I like it! Looks great as a slick-top.
They are out there but very rarely ordered without the vinyl top. I especially love the Givenchy edition with the front 1/2 vinyl roof treatment.
That’s a very sharp look. Love that green!
+1 on the green. The butterscotch trim, not so much. Even still, too elegant to be ruined by offensive colors.
“What do I do?!? My Lincoln lost the second L on the trunk lid!”
“Don’t worry! It’s the silent one.”
My fanship of these continues unabated. Although there are several “Malaise Era” cars I would never be happy in, I would daily-drive one of these gladly. This car may mark the end of real “American style” at full strength. CAFE made cars like this vanish and I don’t think Lincoln has made a car so viscerally satisfying any time since.
I still remember the first one I ever saw in person. A small town FoMoCo dealer owned the lake cottage next door to my Dad’s. He always had new cars there and one Saturday morning in late summer of 1976 there was a Mark V in that strange metallic pink color. Even in that color the car just worked for me.
Interesting color for a demo even in those days…usually they go for something that’ll be an easy sell.
I’ve seen a Mark IV in that color (it was part of some interesting trim package and also included a burgundy vinyl top and very interesting side/rocker panel trim with an inlaid design) but I wasn’t aware it also showed up on the VI.
I know that “Rosé wine” color you’re talking about, and I can easily see how one of these Mark V’s would have looked stunning in it.
To NLPNT’s point below, this color wouldn’t have been my first choice, but if I was a collector and the right specimen in that color came along, the color probably would be a non-issue for me. 🙂
Although I was a fan of the Mark IV, I have to say that I like the V better.
It has those crisp, smooth lines that give it more of an air of dignity and prominence.
Even though I prefer sedans, I will always want either a designer edition (1978 Emilio Pucci or 1979 Bill Blass) or the 1979 Collector’s Series Mark V.
The 1979 Continental Mark V Collector’s Series:
Years ago I remember seeing a custom van with a working clock installed in the back, where a porthole window would go.
In the spirit of public service I always wanted to do that, but never did. Now I’m considering ome for my 77 Mk V. Cool idea,
Nice! A friend of mine just remarked that she had always also thought the humped trunk lids of these cars also reminded her of a clock, or a sundial. It would be a great thing to photoshop onto a picture of your Mark V… 🙂
Just slap one of the modern shark-fin antennas in the correct spot and it could BE a sundial. 😉
The car as expression of style, and a style that I wholeheartedly endorse. I don’t know if I can call these the best of the Mark series (the II might take the cake overall) but I’ve always had a deep admiration.
The white with burgundy vinyl is also unusual, and attractive.
You know, Chris, when I got these pictures, I had wondered if this color scheme might have indicated that this was one of the designer editions offered on these cars. Apparently it wasn’t, but I agree with you that this is a particularly fetching color combo.
Long live the Continental tire hump!
That sounds like an activity.
The “opera” window on this car is an opera window. It is oval shaped, as it should be, and is too small to be useful at anything except perhaps seeing out of from the inside.
This car is too big to be a “personal luxury car”, but is a luxury coupe. The 1958 Thunderbird defined the “personal luxury car” and the 1963 Buick Riviera was in this class. However the second generation Riviera (1966) is almost, if not actually, too big. The T-bird gets bigger with age too, so the concept becomes meaningless.
On the inside, it’s a personal luxury car – have you sat in one? Not too spacious. By contrast, a two-door Continental Town Car of the same year would be a luxury coupe.
The total car is what counts, not just the inside. The T-bird was a personal luxury car till the end of the 1960’s, but the 1972 model is not.
Where are you getting these size criteria for what defines a personal luxury car? From any definitions that can be found on the internet (which, admittedly range somewhat), there’s been nothing I could find that said, “It measured in at certain dimensions, so it sized out of the personal luxury class for (such and such a year).”
It’s fair to say this is a personal luxury car that’s larger than you’d prefer, but it is still very much a personal car with a limited amount of usable space – regardless of its external dimensions.
The 1958 Thunderbird defined the personal luxury car. Its size was just over 200 inches long and 77 inches wide. It was smaller than the 1960 Fords.
Otherwise the Coupe De Ville is also a personal luxury car simply because it is a coupe.
So you’re the final arbiter of that definition? Or maybe you have a copyright or patent on it?
Sorry; but it’s not that simple as a specific number of inches in length. What defines a personal luxury coupe is that it has a unique body, unlike a coupe version of a sedan. That’s what defined the ’58 T-Bird, and it applies 100% perfectly to the Marks. No matter how long they are.
Ok you’re the final arbiter and my opinion is irrelevant
Joseph, you made my day with your story about trying to interpret the circle of letters on the trunk as a clock. Now if the time frame had been shifted several years earlier, and you were that age, and had the need to go, would you have tried to open the “lid” on the rear deck of a 1960 Valiant?
Hahaha!! This was such a visual. 😉
The “loudest” of the mark V series had to be the 1977 Givenchy Designer Series in all its emerald/chamois glory. The first time I saw one of these was in the bright Florida sun – it nearly knocked my eyes out. And if that wasn’t enough, the interior was green velour.
Cloris Leachman drove a bright red non-vinyl top Mark V in the 70’s Disney movie “The North Avenue Irregulars. It was involved in a few chase scenes and really got beaten up. At the end of the movie she destroys a cream colored one too (but that one did have a vinyl top!)
I had forgotten that movie, and I loved it as a kid!
There’s the bit when the bad guys crash into her car, and she is just furious because she breaks all of her nails.
Hopefully the car is still looking as well cared for now as when you found it, another great find.
If only it was 10 years older and in similar condition…
I’m very glad they have their followers, and are being preserved, but I cannot count myself among them. They are creatures of a very specific habitat that is found in very few places on the globe.
During the commute home last week I watched a 72 Thunderbird in the oncoming traffic. The poor thing looked so uncomfortably out of scale and place slogging it out in 35 deg C and congested Melbourne arterial roads.
And this from a person who lists the Mk II in his all-time top 10…
Loved the story about trying to read clockface! Thanks, Joe
Great article, and dynamic pics as usual, Joseph. Always enjoy your writing and photography. I wasn’t really a fan of these Lincolns, then or now. I found them more than a bit too ostentatious. Even as ‘luxury’ cars. I also found they could have looked more modern, with cleaner detailing in the exteriors, sharper fenders aside. These maintained Ford family mid 70s styling cues with the bumpers, front clip, and tail light design. Using a similar sharp edged exterior, I though Chrysler was more creative with the canted front clip, forward protruding front fender edges, and cleaner bumper design on the 1981 Imperial for example. More graphic. It may have been traditional American luxury they were selling, but I thought they could have looked fresher in a number of details.
The design has a ’75 Granada look and feel, in personal luxury form. IMO, it could have looked more modern in details. Not that it would have made it much more palatable to younger buyers.
Thank you so much, Daniel. I do remember thinking these Mark V’s did share FoMoCo styling cues with a few other models — like the LTD-esque taillamps. RE: the Granada comparison, I think this Mark definitely had a slightly more modern, linear look to it, whereas the Granada has a chunkier, mini-Gran Torino look to it – to my eyes, anyway.
To me the Mark V was the leading edge of a new design language at Ford. Everything else from the 70s had bit of a rotund quality to it. The big rectangular grilles and other design cues were affixed to bodies that were more or less angular, but an angular done with soft curves. This car began the knife-edge styling that would be picked up in almost everything else the company did through the mid 80s. Of the larger cars, this one was (to me) the only one done on a scale that really made it work. The Panther Lincolns kept the sharp edges but lost the beauty.
I have driven my ’65 Chrysler in the Loop and other parts of Chicago several times and didn’t really find it to be any problem. Parking on the other hand…
As Jason pointed out, being able to clearly see all the corners of the car makes a big difference.
Dan, you and Jason make great points about the four corners of a car making it easier to manoeuver (sp?) in city traffic. I have extremely limited exposure to that.
I’m not sure which car was further over the top- this Mark V or a contemporary Eldorado. Either way, they were Icon’s of the era. I have a soft spot for the Mark IV (’72-’73), but as is often the case, that’s nostalgia driven.
I’m presently doing a hotrod Lincoln MkV Bill Blass.
It still has a 400 under the hood but:
-Australian heads.
-TMeyer 434 stroker kit.
-Gearvendors splitter.
I’ll do a full cc when it’s done.
That sounds very cool! I’m looking forward to reading about your project.
+1!
It’s hard to believe now, but these cars, the entire Mark series were extremely popular during the 1970s. They were everywhere. This was the zenith of the big coupe and they conveyed a huge amount of status to the driver. I don’t think that there has been another car from Lincoln since, that has come close to making people dream about owning it. Maybe they were impractical, but for two people they were great for eating up the highway miles in complete silence and comfort. I guess that they were the end of an era. You had to be there to appreciate it. While I find the Mark III to be the most classic in style, and the early Mark IVs to be the most powerful, I find the Mark V to be the most impressive. Here’s my favorite the Bill Blass designer’s edition.
+1 on the Bill Blass. My doctor back in the day had one, and oh how I envied him. Such a nice looking car.
If I’m not mistaken, The Mark V was the best selling installment of the entire Mark series, despite only being in production for 3 years as opposed to several other longer runs (the VII ran for a near-eternal 9 years).
I drove a ’79 Collectors Series as a daily driver for two years in 2010-11, throughout Texas and two trips to the east coast. The car was a joy to drive , even in contemporary traffic (Houston, not NY or Chicago!). Every trip felt like an event, something special. The 158 HP meant that there was no thought of aggressive driving, but it would have been out of the car’s character. It held up very well, I retired it and it’s now a 99 point weekend drive. One thing, the two year stint turned me into a permanent calmer driver!
Back on NYC. I always viewed the various non-functioning cars that littered the Cross Bronx Expressway (that frightening hi-way that takes you from the George Washington Bridge to the mouth of I-95 north towards or from Connecticut) as “there-but-for-the-Grace-of-G.. go I” morality-plays to warn the rich an powerful, or a least all of us owners with running cars, what really would happen should one break down in New York City. The synopsis was always some form of the following:
One day a poor car breaks down, owner leaves to find help. For whatever reason, he can’t make it back. Day two, various items, like wheel covers, tires, external accessories disappear. Day three- Day x, real vandals would come by, taking off the doors, smashing windows, starting small fires. Finally, nothing but a burned-out hulk would remain of a once treasured vehicle, but it still would take NYPD / Sanitation another week to get the thing off the side of the roadway.
Thanks for this, which reminded me of an image I had seen in a National Geographic from about 1988 – of one of these Mark V’s that was sitting in a field, stripped and gutted, but with shiny paint, etc. It haunted me then, and I was trying to find this picture using an internet search. I was unsuccessful, but I did uncover this post on Mashable about the NYC photography of Wayne Sorce (https://mashable.com/2017/11/04/urban-color/#d_St00HfnZqt), which featured this great image, taken in 1984.
Even in white and especially in the first photo`s angle, this is truly a menacing looking vehicle. I love it!