This Buick Skylark is a tough old cookie. Last week, Paul shared some photos of it taken this year by Cohort contributor William Oliver. I instantly recognized it, having photographed it around 5 years ago in Manhattan before it suffered some unfortunate collision damage. Let’s look back at better times for the ol’ bird and examine the history of the X-Body Skylark.
The Skylark name had been in regular use by Buick until 1972. When it came time to redesign Buick’s intermediate A-Body model, Buick dusted off an even older nameplate, Century, and put the Skylark name back in its cage.
While Buick had shared platforms with other GM divisions for years, there was generally a significant level of visual differentiation. Not so for the 1973 Apollo, a hastily dolled-up version of the Chevrolet Nova in the same vein as the rebadged Pontiac Ventura II and Oldsmobile Omega. Sure, the Apollo had an optional Buick 350 V8 but otherwise the baby Buick was little more than a Nova with some extra brightwork and different details – the standard Chevy 250 six was the same as that in the Nova.
GM’s introduction of the three Nova clones seemed prescient as, just after its launch, the oil crisis led to fuel shortages and higher gas prices. Despite this, the Apollo wasn’t a huge seller – in its first year, Buick sold 32,793 while Oldsmobile sold 59,643 Omegas.
When GM redesigned the compact X-Body for 1975, Buick also received a version. The Apollo name was carried over for the sedan but the coupe and hatchback dusted off the Skylark moniker. All the redesigned X-Bodies had clean, crisp lines and various mechanical improvements such as new front suspension, a thicker front stabilizer bar and front disc brakes.
As before, the difference was in the details. All four X-Bodies used the same body but the Buicks and the Oldsmobiles (and, later, some Pontiac Phoenix models) had wraparound taillights. Front-end design was reasonably well-differentiated among the four although, interestingly, these supposedly premium X-Body variants never got the newly legal and very fashionable rectangular headlights lavished on other GM models – of the X cars, only the Phoenix and ’79 Nova received them.
The base engine in the Skylark was now Buick’s own 231 cubic-inch V6, a powerplant resurrected for 1975 and which continued to be improved over the years and survived into the following century; the Apollo continued with the 250 cubic-inch six from Chevy. Optional engines consisted of Oldsmobile’s 260 cubic-inch V8 and the Buick 350 cubic-inch V8, the latter of which came with either a two- or four-barrel carburetor. A column-mounted three-speed manual was standard on six-cylinder models but a three-speed auto was the popular choice and the only transmission available with the V8s.
GM was embracing the concept of more “European-inspired” trim levels and so both the Apollo and Skylark were available in top-line S/R (Sport/Rallye) trim, in the same vein as the Oldsmobile Omega Salon, Chevrolet Nova LN and Pontiac Ventura SJ.
The S/R, available in all three body styles and with all engines, featured cloth-and-vinyl bucket seats, a console-mounted shifter for the mandatory automatic, a stalk-mounted headlight dimmer, rallye steering wheel and carpeted door trim, as well as a firmer suspension tune.
Not all Skylarks were “little limousines” as its successor was sometimes referred to. This well-worn New York City example is a base 1978 Skylark sedan, likely powered by the 231 cubic-inch V6; the Apollo name and the Chevy inline-six were dropped for 1976. GM’s game of musical engines continued through the rest of the Skylark’s run, the car varyingly using the Oldsmobile 260, Pontiac 301, Chevrolet 305, Chevrolet 350 and Buick 350. The Buick V6, however, was a constant.
There were cheaper Skylarks still. Like the Omega with its poverty-pack F-85 trim, the Skylark could be had as an S coupe for around $100 less than the regular Skylark coupe. The S forewent some minor niceties and came only with a vinyl bench seat. Brochures didn’t feature any photos of it, likely because it was just a price leader aimed at getting people into showrooms so they could leave with a more expensive car.
Though the Buick’s V6 produced just 105 hp at 3200 rpm and 185 ft-lbs at 2000 rpm, it weighed 200 pounds less than the optional V8s. It also stacked up well against the inline-six in the rival Ford Granada and Mercury Monarch. Though the Ford twins were quieter and more refined, they were slower and less fuel-efficient – Popular Science recorded the Skylark as reaching 60 mph in 16.6 seconds (versus 22.7 for the Ford) and achieving 18 mpg in the city (versus 12 for the Granada). The GM X-Body also had the edge in handling given its parts commonality with GM’s F-Body pony cars; the Ford twins had ponderous handling to match their cushy ride.
With their flossier styling and little-LTD driving experience, however, Ford’s premium compacts made bank, especially considering Ford retained the Maverick for truly budget-conscious buyers. Even the Mercury Monarch outsold the Skylark. For whatever reason, Buick did a lot better in this segment than Oldsmobile even though the latter brand was doing better in divisional sales.
One Skylark that sold poorly was the S/R, Buick’s attempts at offering a European-style concept met with indifference. The S/R trio were generally outsold 4-to-1 by the standard sedan alone. For 1978, Buick dropped any sporting pretences and, with it, the S/R trim; most of its features, bar its sportier suspension tune, moved to the new top-line Skylark Custom. A new Sport option package included the S/R’s mechanical improvements. While the take rate of this package is unknown, overall the Custom sold around three times as well as the previous year’s S/R.
The majority of buyers were happy to buy a standard Skylark just like this NYC example, however – the V6 accounted for the vast majority of sales, typically 80-90%, while the regular Skylark continued to outsell the top-line model. The Skylark may not have been the last word in refinement or build quality but it was a steady seller and the mechanicals were durable. How else could this ’78 still be chugging along on the streets of New York City?
Photographed in the East Village, Manhattan in 2014.
Related Reading:
Vintage Review: 1975 Chevrolet Nova LN – Chevy’s Take On A BMW
Curbside Classic: 1978 Oldsmobile Omega – Grandma’s BMW
Cohort Classic: 1975-79 Pontiac Ventura & Phoenix – Seeking Greater Fortune
I prefer the ‘larks of the 1960s, but I enjoyed your article William. Thank you
Dauntless little Buick? AM C-ing what you did there!
Great article, William!
That Buick reminds me of the one who stopped close to oblivion when a boat named the MV Summit Venture hit the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in 1980. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Skywayaccident.jpg
Yipe! I hope Mr. Hornbuckle specified vinyl seating surfaces on the Apollos’ order form for easy cleanup.
Actually, he was given the honor of being the last person to go over the old bridge before it was closed and replaced by a new Bridge. He stopped on the summit and released carnations in memory of all who died, then visibly shaken, finished the journey. They closed that span and then opened the new bridge right after that.
The anniversary is coming up soon. I remember it clearly, and the picture of the Buick still brings back unpleasant memories.
Photo
A horrible catastrophe. My feeble attempt at humor is inexcusable. Please accept my humble and sincere apology.
No offense taken, I understand it was just a joke on your part and not a bad one. No need for an apology on my part, but I humbly accept it as offered. I just had the luck of living in the area at the time it happened.
The odd thing about the Buick is that Mr. Hornbuckle was so much in a state of shock that he actually went back and turned the ignition off, as he had braked and then put it in park and ran out of the car in a panic. He also saw the bus carrying the majority of victims drive past him into oblivion. I can’t imagine what lived in his dreams, nor what kind of survivors guilt may have dogged him, but other than the last pass over the old span, he never drove over the bridge again.
I remember reading about this on the 20th anniversary of this catastrophe. Even today, looking at the fishing piers from the Sunshine Skyway that were made from the original approaches of the old, twin bridges gives me the willies.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-sep-09-me-lerro9-story.html
This old Buick is dripping with stubbornness and fortitude. Of the X-bodies, this one has always been my favorite.
Will, it’s great you caught this Buick five years ago, helping give us insight into its trajectory.
I’ve always felt the overall design of these cars, especially the sedans, was quite handsome. You can see designers took significant inspiration from European sedans, particularly with the BMW Hofmeister Kink.
In 2005 when GM started hemorrhaging cash, I said EVERY General Motors executive should have had to do a 1000 word essay on why BMC/British Leyland went from 40% of their home market, plus a very strong presence in the rest of the world to just .02 of their home market when Rover Group (Phoenix Four) filed for ‘Insolvency’. One of the major reasons was because BMC started producing ‘me too’ badge-engineered cars just like what GM did ten years later on a grand scale with these X-body cars with barely any differentiation between the four marques. It only got worse after that, especially with GM’s downsized 1977 B & C bodies, and when they got busted for going ‘corporate’ with their engine sharing, further diluting each brand’s exclusivity. These X-body cars from 1973 & later don’t do me any favors at all, and those nasty 5-mph bumpers don’t Improve them in any way.
Yes indeedy!
A very nice prequel. The one feature that always bothered me was that plastic grille in each C pillar of the sedans. It messed up what was otherwise a very smooth design in the same way the front fender gills did so in the Continental Mark V.
These were the cars that showed the crumbling of the old Sloan ladder. The 5 (or more) automotive brands made sense when they served different markets. But when GM tried to ape Ford’s proliferating models within each of its brands things started to come apart.
All that said these Buicks were my favorite flavor in these X bodies.
In retrospect these – and their A-body brethren – reached higher and exceeded expectations in key ways such as handling and stopping.
Remember, just make a couple small changes on the front subframe and you have the undercarriage of the F-body Camaro/Firebird.
With that said, the Nova clones weren’t differentiated enough and ultimately it hurt Chevrolet, one of two GM brands that must excel in the marketplace is the General is to remain an important part of the North American Automotive conversation (the other is Cadillac).
How many reading this today would own a Ford or a Buick but not a Chevy?
Point made.
And as all of us of a certain age know, it wasn’t that way 50 years ago.
How much luxury, really, was in a 1978 Skylark?
How many cool and exclusive features in a ’78 Omega?
How much of that Pontiac attitude shone thru in a ’78 Ventura?
Yesterday in a different thread, some commenters were citing GM stupidity in not consummating a deal with Rivian, to which I noted the reason was believed to be GM’s unwillingness to allow Rivian to share the tech with other manufacturers.
I don’t see that as stupid. Sad, yes. But not stupid.
Having four nearly identical cars diluting their respective brands? THAT’S stupid.
As correctly noted in another thread, that’s British Leyland-league stuff.
At least the differentiation is much better today.
“Having four nearly identical cars diluting their respective brands? THAT’S stupid.”
It could be argued that the GM of 1961 having four compacts of wildly different specifications was also stupid, but the kind of stupid only the rich can afford. This car was the cheap version of having a Corvair/Tempest/F-85/Special. It was just as stupid but at least a lot more efficient.
GM was stuck with the legacy of 5 separate dealer networks to feed. Chevrolet was never going to stand for being prohibited from selling anything larger than a Nova and Buick was never going to stand for being prohibited from selling anything smaller than a LeSabre.
Poor stupid Ford just stuffed everything through Ford dealers, which made it mandatory that Chevy got a competing product, which made it mandatory that Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick and (sometimes) Cadillac got a version. Ford tried to be GM in the 50s and failed. GM tried to be Ford in the 70s – and eventually failed too.
“Ford tried to be GM in the 50s and failed. GM tried to be Ford in the 70s – and eventually failed too.” That’s it in a nutshell, well put.
High-quality articles like this, about cars I would otherwise disregard, are one of the main reasons I like this site. Nice work, William!
What don’t I like about these cars? Their design. The 4-doors are inoffensive enough, I guess, but the coupés remind me of the Aspen-Volaré ones, which I equally dislike. And I could never get onside with that goofy side-dump tailpipe on the driver’s side. Great way to force the driver to smell exhaust when stopped next to a wall, or when the wind’s just wrong.
The coupe rooflines do remind me of the Volare/Aspen! I don’t find them offensive per say but maybe that’s part of the problem, they look neither muscular, broughamy or European. Just generic fishbowls plopped atop a boxy lower body. The sedans (and wagons with the F body) look more fleshed out
The main thing that spoils the design for me is the disproportionately small passenger compartment. I guess it carries the long-hood long-trunk proportions of GM’s big cars, but on a car this size it results in a passenger compartment that looks cramped. Were they cramped?
It looks like a stretched J-car.
Perfect proportions.
And a “falling line” like the new Marcedes-Benz.
As a sign of the times, the design was very amorphous – it could have been dolled up as either a sporty small car, or a luxury small car. Broughamification was setting in, but there was still a possibility that something sportier could return to the market. These cars play in both fields. Remember, the GTO was a Ventura? So, GM wanted these cars to play both ways.
They certainly were no Granada/Monarch. They were better performance wise to Ford, but they didn’t have the bordello spirit in demand during their run. They were also sub-par to the Valiant/Dart, even though the Chrysler products were a generation older. The GM compact quadruplets were the “also ran” in the compact car market in comparison. Even the AMC Hornet/Concord was better.
The X cars were supposed to fix all these shortcomings – but no. We have a lot of fellows out there pining for these GM vehicles because they weren’t FWD nasties with four cylinder engine pings.
Oh – tis a wonder how Detroit didn’t lose their entire market to Toyota, Datsun and Honda during these years.
For the times, I think this car was better made than many. Good handler, too.
Having said that, it’s about the most depressingly bland shape I ever saw on a car as a kid. Every part of it just looks so boring. It should come only in white with a big barcode on the door and be labeled as merely “Car”. Or “Car. Unspecial Edition”. Boxy but not angular. So much blah. Blah front. Blah back. Blah doors. Blah interior. Blah motor. A car for those who have lost the will to brush their teeth. Or hair.
Or put on pants.
And I’m not really down with the brown in this case either. Too dull to even call it poopy-colored. Its like what poop would look like if it had lost the will to live.
Cool wheels would do wonders for it, but it lacks those as well. Just hubcaps. Made of metal. I guess. I dunno. I’m getting depressed thinking about it.
Skylark. “The style of a packing peanut and the passion of a cinder block. Order yours today. Or don’t. It doesn’t matter anyway because one day the universe will implode into a black hole and the last light will dissipear, ending existence and time, so why even try? At your Buick dealer today!”
I get the feeling GM still had the mindset of moving the customer ‘up’ to a more profitable bigger car, rather than making each car in each market segment as good as it could be.
And therein lay the problem – the Japanese companies respected your choice of market segment, and delivered a uniform quality and ownership experience whatever size you chose.
My uncle bought a new ’77 or so Skylark. It looked quite handsome in dark green. Only a few years earlier he’d been driving a gold ’65 Newport. Quite a change!
Given the state of NYCs finances at the time (bankruptcy in ’75) when this car was new, this
is what Kojak’s ride really would have been.
I must learn to copy anything I post here because with a single post in a day I get told I’m commenting too fast and it’s gone. (I did the second time and as usual it posted, obviously.)
My parents had one of those late 70’s Skylark four door sedans for years. It was some horrible light beige with brown nubby cloth upholstery on the bench seat. The back seat was a lot more cramped than you would think. Its V6 always ran like every other spark plug wire was disconnected. Eventually someone ran into the front door and instead of chucking the thing they had it fixed with bodywork that was unbelievably incompetently done. The replacement front door didn’t come anywhere close to fitting.
A completely flat blue paint and rust Nova of the vintage of the Apollo in the second photo, license plate “Joe 36” has been parked on my block for about a decade. There is street cleaning once a week on each side. It always moves, but I have never actually witnessed the event or seen Joe, or maybe his offspring.
Is it not apparent or obvious that these ’75 X cars used the same basic body structure as its ’68-’74 predecessor (albeit with new exterior skin) and a new front end end/subframe/suspension shared with the ’71-up Camaro/Firebird. I get the impression some folks here think these were truly “new” cars in ’75. Far from it.
All it takes is slipping inside one: same front door, and all the same basic architecture. The additional glass in the rear makes them feel more airy, but the crappy rear leg room was an unfortunate carryover.
The longer and wider front end from the Camaro makes the overall proportions a bit odd, as the front track looks decidedly wider than the rear. But that new front end and steering sure made them handle like what they now effectively were: a for door Camaro.
That red Gen 1 coupe is pretty sharp looking. In college a friend came back from break one year with a brand new 2 door tan-gold with tan top and interior – we were all quite impressed. Of the NOVA variants I’d have to do the Ventura, if only because I need a round IP…
My great uncle bought a super low mileage 1979 light blue Skylark sedan when it was barely a year old and kept it for about 8 years after which he got his 1985 Park Ave FWD. My 1979 Fairmont that was given to me a few years before 1989 was such a POS that I sold it the first chance I got and took over my uncles Skylark for one Summer after which it was sadly wrecked.
It was a base model with the 231 free breathing 115 Hp V6 and I put some new Pep Boys 205/70R14 tires on it along with upgraded rear shocks and a few other things.
I remember the light blue paint was getting a bit thin on the hood and trunk lid but the car was reliable and peppier than my 79 Fairmont. It also had cloth seats and A/C and I installed my own stereo in it to get rid of the AM unit. Hardly my favorite older car but far from the worst.
Here’s my 1978 Buick skylark custom model I’ve had this car for a few years my grandma had it for almost 30 and gave it too me I’ve done a lot to the car sense I got it and I love it been drive it a lot for 2 years and I still have the original engine and everything and it still runs like it’s brand new
Hello, dear William.
You may find it hard to believe, but I’m Nima from Iran,
And enjoy the article and its valuable information.
When I was 10 years old, 30 years ago,
We had a Skylark B2.
I had a classic 1988 coppers five years ago.
Good memories came to life for me.
You knew they loved U.S. cars in Iran.
Bought a new one in 1978. Skylark custom trim, landau top. Silver with burgundy velour/vinyl interior. All power options with a 305 V8. It came with Firestone deluxe champion belted tires. Replaced those with BF Goodrich radial ta’s they handled well and looked great those Buick chrome rims. Drove the car 4 years. Replaced it with 1979 Cadillac Seville