(first posted 6/10/2011) In car years, fifteen years might as well be a century. It’s late, so help me out: what other American car was built for fifteen years, since the Model T? Oh right; the Checker. The Jeep Wagoneer was a truck; well for that matter, so was the Checker. So what am I missing? Yes; the Century’s body-mate, the Cutlass Ciera. These two A-Bodies set some kind of record, for sure. Ironic too, coming from the company that invented the annual styling change. Since out of the some 2.2 million A-Centuries built the overwhelming majority were four-door sedans, let’s celebrate the Century’s longevity coup with a coupe.
The A-Team story is a massive one; they were undoubtedly the most visible face of the General during those difficult years of its production (1982 -1996). Anybody who ever walked into a rental counter during the A-poch was all too likely to find themselves in these all-too familiar surroundings. Let’s face it; the interiors of these GM fleet queens were much more likely to be remembered than their totally forgettable exteriors.
Stepping into your Hertz Century was like a preview of the visit you were just about to make to your parents’ house: highly predictable: decade after decade, the (mostly) same furniture and decor, everything in its familiar place. The slightly roarty thrumm of the Buick V6 was like your father’s voice: you could recognize it anywhere, under any of the millions of GM cars it powered, including his Buick Skylark. And the Century’s handling was like Mom’s bland cooking: Predictable, but uninspired. The whole experience was comforting, in a way; but you were always glad to get home to the more eclectic surroundings of your own house and car, not to mention Mexican and Asian food.
Perhaps that was actually the brilliance of the Century’s longevity as a rental car staple: there was never any need to familiarize oneself with any of the controls; everything just fell to hand from years of practice. You could slide in and drive it blindfolded. Kind of like the toilet bowl in your parents’ house: you could hit it even in total darkness at three in the morning having just snuck in from a wild night out and under the influence of one thing or another (or some combination thereof). And your left hand just automatically reached for the cruise control, or that familiar towel bar to steady your wobbly stance.
My analogy is not meant to demean, but just looking at that picture of the interior brings a flood of rental car memories. One of them has to do with the coupe version like this one, except for being an Olds, as if that made any real difference. The Century and Ciera were as indistinguishable from each other as Wonder bread is from Sunbeam white bread. If the motel clerk asked you what you were driving, you’d mutter…one of those white GM rentals; do you want me to go look and see whether it’s an Olds or Buick? No, never mind.
Anyway, the Century and its trusty Ciera stablemate arrived in 1982 in the ever-popular four door sedan and what may have been called a coupe, but what was technically a two-door sedan, a body style (and nomenclature) that was rather archaic by then. Why? Beats me. But it sure didn’t sell worth beans.
Even when it was gussied up, as in the euro-sporty blacked out “T” version, or this very rare Gran Sport, made only for 1986, of which all of 1029 were built. Trying to compete with the handsome aero T-Bird, I assume?
Before I lose my story thread, I was on a business trip to Chicago in 1986, and given the keys to an otherwise almost identical Olds Ciera. But lo and behold! When I found my car on the lot, it had this brand new coupe roof! I either hadn’t been reading Motor Trend faithfully enough, or GM had done one of its curious fleet numbers, sending out early production cars to the rental companies before they were properly introduced to the public.
I admit I may have muffed the new coupe’s intro, but I swear GM did this kind of thing: my boss from NY came to visit me in what I think was 1987, and when we walked out to his rental to go for lunch, it was a car I had never seen or properly known of its existence: a Chevy Corsica! For a guy who couldn’t help but keep up on new car intros, even if it was cars that didn’t interest all that much, this was like driving up in a 1965 Chevy…six months before its introduction. Whoa! “Are you working for GM on the side, as a prototype tester?”
Wikipedia confirms it: “The Corsica was first sold as fleet cars to rental agencies and to large companies in 1987, prior to mainstream release.” Ok; that’s a curious reversal of the usual strategy, but then GM did lots of things that repeatedly surprised me back then. I had already started my personal GM Death Watch some years earlier…
Anyway, the new coupe roof eventually migrated to the Century in 1989. But the new roofline didn’t help sales either: less than 5% of Centuries came with it, and it was dropped after a few years. Makes this almost a rare bird.
That GM inter-brand confusion problem does tend to be emblematic of the good old GM of the time. And the Century embodies a few others too. Typically for its maker, the Century took a while to really start to feel like it was well built. That’s not to say the early versions were downright shaky, like the X-Bodies it essentially was. Yes, I’m sure we all know that by now, but the transformation from GM’s Deadliest Sin to perhaps one of its best-made cars ever was remarkable: because the new Century managed to hide its roots so well; it would have taken an X-ray to see its X-body skeleton.
But then the Century just kept on being built, seemingly forever. In its prime retail sales years, in the mid-late eighties, Buick moved some quarter million of them per year. In that era, the Centiera twins were the functional equivalent of the Camry. No need to elaborate.
But unlike the Camry’s regular four year cycle of complete refreshment, the Century became lost in time. GM was addicted to maintaining its volume, to try to stem its ever-shrinking market share by whatever means its marketing mavens could cook up. So continuing the Century while spitting out same-sized newer Regals must have made sense to somebody.
And for the Century and Ciera, that meant turning into what became essentially a fleet-only car in its later years. I suppose a few of them were sold to certain geriatric private buyers if they asked nicely. But for what it’s worth, the Centieras became the equivalent of the Checker; just aimed at different slice of the fleet market.
Why not? GM had made good money on these cars in their prime retail years, and the line workers could build them blindfolded by them, and still turn out one of GM’s best built cars of the period. In 1993, J.D. Power affirmed that, saying the Century was somewhere very near the top of the pile.
And although the listed price of the Century roughly increased along with the rate of inflation, the discounts, especially to fleets, were ever bigger. I seem to distinctly remember reading that the typical fleet Century was going for $12k near the end of its long road. That’s thousands less (adjusted) than what they were going for back in their retail heyday.
It seems like just yesterday that the City of Eugene bought a whole passel of Centuries in ’95 or ’96 for their building inspectors and such. And it seems like only this morning that they were finally replaced (by Prii, of course). A real living time capsule, and odd too, to see a like-new white Century driving up to your job site almost a quarter century after it was introduced. Made you feel old. Or comforted, sort of; like standing there looking down at that familiar toilet bowl and knowing you could hit it blindfolded.
Well, my parents’ house is history, as is the old GM. But lots of memories remain. The A-Body story is a vast one, and we’ve had quite a few chapters here already. And there will probably be more.
The slope back coupes appeared the same year as the slopy roofed sedans, 1989, which is also the year they ditched having the 3.8L V6 and the 2.8L V6 as an option for the 3300 V6 (a short deck version of the 3800). But they probably pulled a “Corsica” with them too. I think the Century Coupe lasted til 1993, the Ciera ’92.
I would hazard this is one of the rarer 1991-93 ones since the 1989-90 models had solid amber front turn signals.
Every time I go beater shopping I think of getting one of these as a Wagon, for exactly the reasons you state. They are so familiar, I know all of their virtues and vices, and by 1990 they worked all the serious bugs out of them. Although I still hold out for one day were I’ll be unified with a Hess & Eienhardt Cutlass Ciera Convertible.
Bingo. The `89 and `90s had solid amber turn signals. I had a `90 sedan as a winter car a few years back. It had the Iron Duke and was rusty, but it was extremely dependable. Of course, I am sure my obsessive-compulsive cleaning and maintenance behavior helped, too.
Laurence Jones, if you want one i know where one is located for sale?? the convertible…
Email me and ill tell you where…dakotasport94 at hotmail.com
just for info… i’m driving a model 1987 cutlass ciera coupe (old double headlights, still no composites) and it’s got the sloped roof! actually, by the papers the car must have been made in late 1986. the slope back coupes appeared well before the equally roofed sedans. greetings
Sometime in about 1992, my parents bought one of these, a 1991 Century Custom 4-door 3.3 with the 3-speed automatic, white with burgundy cloth, and about 20k miles on the clock. It replaced a 1989 Dodge Spirit Turbo, which was basically a good car, but it had started giving off warning signs that the goodness was about to end, hence the Century. (The Century was later replaced by a Camry, as alluded to in the CC.)
Our Century was a great car, with only a few real flaws. It ate brakes, though my mother was and is a leadfooted driver. The back seat was typical GM, low to the floor with a floppy bottom cushion. No legroom in back when sitting behind my 6’1″ dad. The seats were manual, and with no seatback rake adjustment. Not too long after we got it, we had to have it painted under warranty to fix what was apparently about to turn into the infamous GM flaking paint, though our original paint still looked good. The quality of the respray was also good, and the car always looked nice.
On the plus side was plenty of grunt from the 3.3, which I believe had 160 horsepower. It was as fast or faster than the Turbo Dodge, but handling of the Century was infinitely worse than the Dodge, while the ride was no better, though it is fair to say they both rode comfortably. The front seats were a splitch bench, but comfortable, and though they only had fore and aft adjustments, they were set at EXACTLY the right angle, and adjustments were barely needed anyway. The Delco tape player radio (which mom made them install from another car since ours didn’t come with the tape deck) played clean and loud, with excellent radio reception. The AC was ice cold till the day it was sold and never had to be touched. It got decent fuel mileage. We even towed 2 Polaris personal watercraft with it occasionally and it did OK for that.
Starting from our approximate 20k miles, my parents owned it till about 180k, at which point they gave it to me when they bought the Camry in about 1996. Somewhere along the way it its later years, the Century developed a burned exhaust valve on one of the cylinders, dropping that hole’s compression, but by that point it wasn’t worth fixing and the only real symptom was a lumpy idle anyway. I drove it like that to 224k when it was sold, tired, but still dead reliable. I bought an Isuzu P’up Diesel, which is another story altogether.
The only failures besides normal wear items were a radiator fan, the harmonic balancer (which I can now diagnose from 3 blocks away) and the throttle valve cable to the transmission, which made us think the tranny was toast, but the cable was just frayed in its sleeve and once we replaced it, everything was fine. In fact, years later, while I was a VW technician at a dealer, the best mechanic I ever knew was on the phone talking about his parents car, which woudlnt shift at anything but redline, as our Century had when the cable failed. He hadn’t figured it out yet, and when he told me it was a Skylark 3.3 with the 3-speed, I shared my experience. He came to work the next day and said I was right! At the time, this guy was my idol, and it went a lonnnnng way towards making me look good. He actually started asking me my opinions on certain things as he worked across the shop on Lamborghinis and so forth (yes, really.) I would go on take his place later, if only for about 4 seconds.
Anyway, these A cars were basically good, boring cars. I wouldn’t mind having a really clean one now to uses as a runaround car even today.
And since I mentioned the Camry (RIP), I will share when it won Camry of the Month at Passatworld.com, where I was once a very regular poster:
http://www.passatworld.com/forums/79-passat-month/209103-camry-month-april-2006-sharky-sharkinson-sharky.html
Ha…Springfield, Missouri is my hometown. I still have a bunch of family living there.
I know. I’m Facebook friends with your brother, the bus driver. I have mentioned that fact a couple of times here, but you don’t often read replies to your own posts, but then neither does the bus man.
I usually do read the comments on my posts. I definitely missed those. the Bus is a good brother as well as friend. He sure is political though, much more than I am!
You’re way cool.
What happened when the balancer went on this one? And I’m also curious about the 3-block thing! 😀
The sound it makes when the balancer fails on one of these or a 3.8 GM engine is why you can diagnose it from 3 blocks away. It is unbelieveably loud. Loud and distinctive. LOUD, I say!
When mine failed I thought the engine had thrown a rod. It sounded like death, really really bad and scary. It sounded like something in the engine was slamming into a cross between an anvil and an empty 5-gallon plastic bucket.
As I sat there losing my mind on what I was going to do for a car now that mine had blown up because I was POOR at the time, it gradually dawned on me that although it SOUNDED like death, it ran the same as always. No loss of power etc. When the sound first started, I was near home and drove back there just fine with what I thought was my thrown rod. There was no oil all over the road, no pistons through the hood. I went outside and started it up as always, and except for the noise everything was fine. I started thinking of other things that could make the noise, noticing it was coming from the front of the engine. After a time, I had it narrowed down to one of the accessory drive items or a pulley or something, but to that point I still had no clue that the crankshaft serpentine pulley was also the balancer (this was long before I was a mechanic) and that the balancer was 3 pieces…the inner that bolts to the crank snout, the rubber cushion, and the outer weighted portion that the belt rides on.
I called an Olds dealer a few blocks away and told them my symptoms, and he instantly said it was the balancer and gave me a quote. They had obviously fixed these many times, and car guy though I may have been, I had never heard of this issue. Because I was broke, I could still buy the balancer and an electric impact needed to remove the huge bolt to change it out and be under their price, so that’s what I tried. This was before places like Harbor Freight and their $1.99 power tools, so I plunked down cash for an impact and that %&*##* bolt still would not budge, so in the end I got to buy a balancer, pay labor at the Olds dealer down the street, AND own a nice new impact, all with money I didn’t have.
Awesome.
Oh how I know that story
Nice. I’ve got a few stories of the “poor and have to fix the car” type myself. And, learning to do those repairs, I guess just like all of us who started w/o any professional training, i’ve bought my share of tools that I either didn’t need for the actual job or wasn’t able to use properly (LOL). Oh how it stung every time when I’d realize I didn’t have to spend the money I didn’t have (aka the “i could have done it for much less!!!” part). The good news is I never quit working on cars so all those tools eventually turned out to be quite handy. Except for one, I’m still waiting to see when I’ll get to use it. 😀
A long time friend of mine, who is still working for an independent transmission repair shop, once told me years ago that numerous cars with the 125C transaxle were misdiagnosed and replaced or junked when all that was wrong was the frayed cable. My 1993 high mileage Ciera 3300 had this happen so I went to the local junk yard for a mere 2 dollars and 24 cents pulled a good one from a donor Century and in just a few minutes had in replaced in the parking lot of a local restaurant and all was good again. Had that car for well over 200k miles where it began it’s third life after being traded in on a 00 Impala and was probably sold at a corner used car lot somewhere.
The “coupe” roof showed up first on the 1986 Cutlass Ciera, and in 1989 it spread across the A-Bodies, even to the four-door sedans. The lone exception was the Celebrity, which kept the “formal” rear window in 1989. The Celebrity and 6000 two-doors died at the same time. Despite the fact that the reshaping did more for the coupes, the two-door Century was available only until 1993, and the Olds may have been canned even sooner.
As to the vintage of this example, I’ll have to think. Trim turned body-color in 91, so it’s before that. Of the 89-90 period, only the latter had door-mounted belts, so I have it pegged as a 1990.
That makes sense now, regarding the Ciera coupe roof. Because I’m quite certain that trip to Chicago had to have been in the late summer of ’85, and I must have had a very early one. Memories do play tricks…
Remarkable write-up of a less than remarkable car ( I never realised the Century Coupe existed )
“Kind of like the toilet bowl in your parent’s house: you could hit it even in total darkness at three in the morning having just snuck in from a wild night out and under the influence of one thing or another (or some combination thereof). And your left hand just automatically reached for the cruise control, or that familiar towel bar to steady your wobbly stance.” Quote.
You’re in the wrong job Paul, you should be writing paperbacks or Hollywood screenplays.
Do they pay?
Seriously, after picking this car for today’s CC, I did stare blankly at the screen for a few minutes, before something started to well up…
You know, Paul, that if this were a CC on the Cutlass Ciera, Educator Dan would be all over this from the get-go! As it is, yes, these cars were some of the most reliable cars on the planet according to CR – but they were still dinosaurs as GM built them ‘way too long with no improvements aside from the aero look backlight!
The comments about driving one of these being like going to your parents’ house are apt, because the only time I ever drove one was at my grandmother’s. A very competent but not exciting car, which is what she wanted, I’m sure. She got hers in probably ’89, and kept it until she died at age 94 in 2005 (by which time her keys had been taken away, but my aunt would start it up periodically).
This is the Buick Holden raided for the 3800 V6 to repower their version of the Catera the 88/89 VN Commodore good motor they are everywhere.
My first car was my mom’s castoff ’85 Buick Century Station Wagon. Were it not for a couple of guys rolling Chevettes (which in 1997, would only happen in FL) it would have been the slowest, lamest thing in the high school parking lot. Until I delivered enough pizzas to put a few bucks away and buy a cd player, my stereo was a battery-powered boombox with a copper wire running from the boombox antenna to the car antenna. I got a year out of it until the transmission went at 130K(probably my fault) and the ’91 Blazer I bought afterward was like a BMW in comparison, even if the Blazer is a “Deadly Sin”.
Of course the Century name was first used in 1936 to market the 100 mph car. Bet that was wild on roads and tires of that era. Bet stopping was hair raising too as brakes had not kept up with horsepower.
Wonder how fast the example in the CC would go?
Wikipedia has a good writeup on Centurys. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_Century
It was the first “muscle car” in the modern idiom, by dropping the engine from a bigger car into a smaller one. Great car, and I hope to run into one someday.
I think a Car & Driver test of the Cutlass Ciera with the typical package (3300, 4 speed 4T40) in 1993 had it pegged at 0-60 at 10 seconds flat and all out (governor limited) to 105 or 107 (Also, I think a lot of 3800 equipped cars were governor limited to 107-109 because of their tires, I remember the tests of the new for ’92 Eighty Eight and Bonnevilles were limited to 107, although they had rather zippy high 8 second 0-60 times).
They were the fwd logical outgrowth of what kind of car the Dart/Valiant were in the 1960s and 1970s (I’d include the Falcon in that but it died a less visible death and was morphed more often). They’re still remarkably popular used cars here in the Bay Area, 15 years later, for their bone cheap and plentiful parts supply, and most of the ones that were private owned were owned by little old widows that took them to the Grocery store and back, yet had them serviced to their late husbands instructions on “how to operate a motor vehicle”
They’re a last of a breed, kinda. The W-Body Impala (redone in 2006, 5 years ago) is it’s logical successor in “perfectly dull” after being in production, more or less since the fall of 1999. If you count the basic W-body, it’s been in production with modification since the fall of 1987. So, when that car is finally killed in 2014(?) It’ll have served 8 seasons exactly the same, 15 in a similar shape, and 26 as a chassis. Jesus. But none of them will be as lovingly cared for as the Century or Ciera were. Your best bet for gray hair mothball specials from the W-body family would be a 2009 LaCrosse. Which, with a little more depreciation or more disposable income doesn’t look all that bad to me, especially if I can get the bench seat in leather with a sunroof (CXL grade, baby)
No doubt that if left to their un-regulated devices, cars like this could have hit 125 or so, with 160 hp and their not all-that-bad aerodynamics.
160hp makes me shudder!!! My first car was a Mercury Sable LS (2nd gen), 140 hp. It was a dead reliable beater that refused to be killed by my horrible teenage driving habits. I really do now feel sorry for what I did to that car… but anyway, one of the memories I have to the day is the recurring embarrassment of mashing the gas pedal on the highway as the light turned green and having people tailgate and then angrily pass me by. And every time I had that thing honest to god floored….. finally after what seemed like forever i was up to cruising speed. Must have taken about 10 seconds. Or was it 12? I never counted…
The number is frozen in my memory: 10.6 seconds to 60mph (according to C/D). Vulcan was a hard-working god, but none to quick…
And they all smelled like sulfur and rotten eggs after being whipped…
Paul, these A-bodies could do 113–Motor Trend did an article on a Viper at Talledega, but the writer drove the Ciera rental flat-out to see how the new banked track could take a regular car. This was in ’96–the Viper GTS test I think. Or ’94 maybe?
My 1993 base Ciera S sedan with the 3300 and 3 speed 125 trans-axle was a consistent 9 second 0-60 car. The 4 speed versions, which strangely used the exact same 2.73 final drive ration were a little slower say 9.3 seconds. i did drive a rather rare 1989 Ciera International Series sedan that used a better 3.06 ratio and it was noticeably stronger down low so it’s possible that these broke into the mid to high 8 second range with this setup.
Had a lot of experience with the 1994-96 3100/4T60E equipped cars which used a 2.97 axle and they were the quickest of the bunch with sedans usually in the low 8 second range and wagons around 9.
A V6 3800 Commodore can be wrung out to 210kmh but you can chip em for more
The top picture looks remarkably like my elementary school circa 1974, and the white Century coupe would be the classic teachers’ car.
I remember trolling the parking lot and being utterly unimpressed. Except Mrs. Gold my 3rd grade teacher who some how drove a new Coupe deville each year. I wonder what her husband did?
I distinctly remember her panic stopping because of an errant ball in her white/black top ’69. What a beautiful car! (I also remember the distinct front end bounce after the stop! Not bad for, at the time, an 8 year old.)
Btw, I always liked these Century’s and can’t tell you why. Perhaps it is the comfort food you describe.
These are one of my default “I need a cheap reliable car” recommendations to friends. Though on the ground and it is getting nearly impossible to find the 1-owner little old lady ones anymore.
Las time I was car hunting I stumbled across a r*diesel* coupe Century. Which immediately vaulted to the top of my “Do NOT want” list.
The first time I seriously considered one of these was in LA after the 84 Olympic cars became available. The White Century Olympic Sedans were plentiful on used lots afterward. The only other color they came in was brown… I passed as the trim was pulling apart in several places at 6 months in.
I rented a 97 Century once, It was still rather Ho Hum in its newer body. But very competent. Light switch still in a familiar location, 60/40 Bench seats, Brown cloth.
Thank you for giving a competent Detroit slugger a nice Write up.
My parents bought an ’85 Ciera wagon in 1996. It was green with fake wood on the side. It was powered by a 3.0L Buick V-6 with a carburetor. That was a hideous dog of an engine that churned out 110hp. It was such a dull car that I forgot until right now that it was the first car I legally drove after getting my learner’s permit in ’97. About the only thing worth mentioning about that car is that it looked like it had been hermetically sealed in a garage in 1985. Not a speck of rust and nary a scratch.
God this Buick brings back memories….While in high school my mother drove a 89 Pontiac 6000 STE with all wheel drive, and my father drove a 91 Dodge Spirit R/T. Nothing like some rare detroit iron to stir up good times from the past!
I’ve always had a soft spot for the A-bodys….I used to see one of those 86 Century GS coupes on my way to school every morning. I’d kill to get my hands on it today! I’d kill to have any of those 3 cars back.
I love how the A-cars kept their circa-1982 dashboard right up to the end. Imagine cross-shopping this Century with the new ovoid Taurus in 1996.
Even rarer than the Century coupe was the ’85-’87 Electra/Ninety Eight coupes, which shared the same upright roof as the already-dowdy sedans. They bombed and I’ve only seen a couple of them in 25 years, but I saw a pristine one parked on the street about a year ago. The more rakish (relatively speaking) Eighty Eight/LeSabre coupes hung on until ’91, but they weren’t exactly popular, either. I don’t know what GM’s fascination was front-drive, two door sedans was in the ’80s, especially when they still offered the popular G-body coupes through ’87 – only the most traditional buyers would have looked twice at these cars. Then the General inexplicably went the other direction with the GM-10 coupes and their idiotic aircraft-style doors. The rest of the industry had given up on big coupes for good reason, but GM saw fit to bet the farm on two doors and delay the W-sedans for several years. I honestly don’t know how GM staved off bankruptcy as long as it did.
I always liked the A-bodies for some whatever reason. They were ubiquitous in my youth, and still one of the better hand-me-down rides when I was in high school 10 years ago. They weren’t “good” cars, though. They suffered from just about every possible GM malady, and the early ones were just plain awful. But they embodied the old “A GM car runs bad longer than most cars run at all” axiom.
My first car was a first-year 1982 Century 4-door. My father and I went in halves on it in January 1990, when we decided I needed a car at college. It was only $1000, which was absurdly cheap, because the dealer though the transaxle was failing. Turned out it was just a bad torque converter, which when disconnected the car ran perfectly well.
It was a two-tone rosewood over maroon Limited with a pillowy maroon interior and white turn signal lights, and had the 181 V6. It was a genuinely nice car, until the engine pitched a rod at 105K in about 1992. My dad had it towed home and a replacement engine installed, I drove it until the fall of ’93 when I traded it in. Should have kept it, but it was getting tired already. Still, nearly four years of good service from a nice comfortable car that I actually liked. I even have an original sales brochure for it.
I was pretty familiar with it too. My driver-ed car was an ’87 Cutlass Ciera.
By the way, those weren’t rental-mobiles here in the heartland. GM kept making them and selling them to private buyers who couldn’t warm up to the W-bodies in the early ’90s. They were very popular here.
After my return from a very extended sojourn overseas, I arrived in Canuckistan in 2004 with little money, a wife and two kids. I had no job and no wheels. A tour of the local beater lots turned up a 1990 Ciera SL, loaded for a measly $750.
The exterior was faded silver but the interior was mint. Everything but one rear window worked. The a/c was ice cold and it had one of the best instrument panels I have ever seen. Six round gauges, no confusion there at all. The stereo worked great, too. I admired that car for its honesty. I always ran, it never cost me a penny in the two years I had it. The 3300 V-6 had lots of torque and there were no surprises in handling at all. Yes, it had a pretty hefty gasoline habit but having spend a paltry sum for it, I wasn’t too worried about it.
But it looked like shit, no offense meant. I was building up a business at the time and it didn’t really fit the image I was trying to cultivate at the time. I needed a shiny little car that was easy on gas to impress people. I reluctantly sold the Ciera for, get this, $750 and then went looking for a nice, new, econobox.
Well, I had been out of Canada so long, I really didn’t have a credit rating at that point. The only store that would finance me was GM, and I ended up with an Aveo LS 5 door. What a total POS that thing was. In 20,000 km it went through an engine, transmission and two PCMs, along with numerous other small things. Even worse was the thing was only marginally better on fuel than the Ciera. I got out of it in 2008 for not a bad sum and vowed to never buy anything GM ever again.
The Ciera was a far better car than the Aveo. It was well put together, solid and had good power. I cost me next to nothing to drive and I enjoyed the lazy bottom end torque of the rough Buick motor. Funny thing about the A-Body is that car journalists hated it but consumers loved them. They sold loads of them and anybody I knew who had one just loved it.
Go figure.
I guess I have experienced the highs and lows of A-body ownership. My first one was an ’88 Celebrity wagon with a drivetrain from hell; the 2.8 liter V6 found numerous creative ways to break down (mostly electrical, intake gasket too), and the trans failed at 53K miles. My second one was a ’93 Ciera wagon which was pretty bulletproof except the A/C didn’t take well to R134; it was at best fair to middling after that.
We need a car like the A-wagon again. The amount of stuff it will swallow up is simply amazing, and it’s easy to load because the cargo floor is nice and low. Consumer Reports used to grade wagons by liftover height. Can’t do that with the ridiculously high load floors of SUV/CUVvehicles today. Also my Ciera routinely delivered up to 25 MPG with its antiquated engine technology.
I had the interesting experience of briefly owning the Ciera and a 1985 Mercedes W123 wagon simultaneously. That led me to sell the Benz. The Ciera was roomier, quieter, better riding, easier to get in and out of (the Benz had less room between the seat and the front of the door opening), the transmission shifted more smoothly, and the Ciera was a better wagon (more cargo room, bigger under floor storage area, second seat easier to fold). My Benz was a gas engined version brought in via the grey market, and it got about 16 MPG versus 20-25 in the Olds. Any and all of the mystique surrounding the W123 has totally evaporated for me as a result of this back to back comparison with a supposedly mediocre GM car that beats the Benz in every real world category.
When I was looking to replace my Ciera Sedan, I looked all over the place for a Ciera Wagon. Even here on the rust-free West Coast they were very hard to find by then. All the GM mechanics I knew swore by the A-Body, by the way. They told me they were good, basic cars that were easy to fix and had a ready supply of cheap parts when they needed any repair.
Vancouver is snobs-ville but a quick search of Craigslist showed quite a few low km Cieras, no doubt due to their elderly client base! If I ever needed a $1000 beater again, I would buy one in heartbeat!
So what you’re saying is I should have held out for a pristine 1993 Cutlass Cruiser instead of caving to W123 lust and getting a 1981 280E. I kinda think in a weird way they are kindred spirit cars though: The General Motors FWD Plymouth Valiant versus the German Plymouth Valiant.
Wow! 32 comments on a 90 Century. These cars (along with their Cutlass Ciera siblings) really were everywhere here in the midwest. These are still kind of the 80s-early 90s beater of choice around here. These cars always reminded me of the vanilla ice cream that comes in the 5 gallon pail. Nothing horribly wrong with it, but but not what you buy if you really like vanilla ice cream. And you even found a white one!
Your timing is perfect. My mother had a knee replaced a couple of weeks ago, and I have been driving her Buick to give it some exercise while she is laid up. 3.8 V6 and a 4 speed automatic. No, it is not a 90s Century, but an 06 Lacrosse. I have decided that it really is a Century, but one that got a promotion and is wearing a better suit.
Interesting that you called it the “Camry of its day”.
I imagine many of these were traded on Camrys,
When my father passed in 1992, my mother traded a 1989 Olds 98 and a 1984 Chrysler New Yorker in on a 1992 Camry LE. Her last car. When she passed in 2009, some lucky dog got a 92 Camry with 35K miles.
I think that gen Camry and Accord were the initial “virus” that ultimately killed the US auto industry. So many folks bought their first CamCord at that time, and never looked back.
How timely of a post. I just found a 94 Ciera wagon for sale here locally. I’m considering it carefully as I need a hauler, and really don’t want a minivan or SUV.
I have something of a history with these cars, I remember seeing development mules in 1981 on I-80/90 east of Toledo, wondering what the heck those things were. Much to my surprise, I saw the exact same cars in a spy shot in a car magazine several months later.
While I’ve never owned one of these, I’ve driven a bunch of them. My in-laws had a couple versions of the Cutlass Ciera, they bought them like clockwork every 3-4 years or so. I got to drive them occasionally, and they were bland, but familiar. That isn’t necessarily bad. I eventually found that I liked driving the cars. It wasn’t a thrill ride, I was just trying to get everyone to Aunt Pat’s in one piece. Quiet, comfortable ride, you arrived relaxed. Not bad.
The one company I worked for had these as transportation for folks traveling on company business for short drives. The carbureted V6 Celebritys were nice cars, but the driveline was pretty bad though. We eventually got the Iron Duke fuel injected models, they were much better to drive and on fuel, too.
As noted before, these are STILL all over the midwest, and I know several people who only buy these cars, presumably because they know what they’re getting. And, these are the cars that really are recommended by the mechanics, for reasons explained previously. Even though they’re still fairly plenty, they are old now and these folks will eventually have to move on to some other “no surprises-mobile”.
I’m still on the fence about that wagon, though…
Hey, man, if you can find a good A-Body wagon at a reasonable price, snap it up. I would in a heartbeat and toss out my wife’s POS Taurus, which is truly an awful automobile.
Look at those seats – that is some long wearing material! My wife has a similar seat material in her 2002 Alero and it still looks pretty good. I’ll have to ask her grandma what they used; she sewed seats for Fisher Body in Michigan, primarily the leather seats for Oldsmobiles, but I bet she knows. You still see some of these in New England, which is pretty amazing given the rust issues here.
IIRC the last car plant in New England, the GM plant in Framingham MA, produced A body cars as its last run. I remember the Commonwealth of MA buying lots of Celebrity models to use as state vehicles back in the Dukakis days. Framingham closed in 1989.
The two-door coupe almost makes the Century look desirable. Almost.
The only positive thing I can say after seven years of driving one and steadily watching it disintegrate under my feet is that it makes a great winter beater and handled remarkably well in the snow. I still see them for sale at the tote-the-note lots down the street but you’d have to point a gun at me to get me to buy one again.
By then the only way to tell a Buick from an Olds was if the taillights were horizontal or vertical. Even the Buick ventiports were gone.
I first drove one these in the form of a Buick Century rental car in San Francisco (1990 I think). It had the “Iron Duke” 4 cylinder engine with the 4T40. This was a rather gutless combination that we drove up to Lake Tahoe and back down. It went much better on the return trip (downhill).
Then I was gifted with my mother-in-law’s ’83 Ciera 4dr sedan in 1993. This had been a Montreal car, which meant that it had serious rust problems. I had to replace the entire floor in the driver’s footwell to pass the safety inspection. Lots of pop rivets and roofing tar. The rust extended to the exterior on the doors and rear quarter panels. The best part about this car was it was so rough that you didn’t need to wait for a gap to change lanes. You just signalled and cranked the wheel. The traffic parted like magic. The somewhat gutless 283 with a carb was very reliable and got good mileage on the highway (7 litre /100km = 34 mpg). Retired in 1996 for very serious rust, leaking rear crank seal, good trans, cold air.
That was replaced with a ’91 Century wagon (Limited, top of the line). This was generally a good car with medium/average maintenance costs. Parts are dirt cheap. $50 buys you a cabin fan motor or a radiator cooling fan motor. Suffered a cracked exhaust manifold and broken front sway bar. The worst problem was a broken rocker arm stud. This was repaired at modest cost. This car was sent to the crusher in 2006 running well and with cold air, but it needed a lot of suspension work.
The Ciera’s instrument panel with the stand-up binnacle and big round gauges is far superior to the Century’s gunslit speedo arrangement (hated that).
I have a long history with these cars.
Bought more of em’ than I can count. One that stands tall is a 1994 Century with the 3.3L that had only 29k miles on it.
Think I bought it last year or the year before. I sold it to a lady who would only need it for a 3 mile drive… roundtrip. I’m willing to bet that 20 years from now it becomes available again with a rousing 60k on the clock.
does anybody know how many 1989 century 2 door coupes were made?
That blacked-out Century T-Type is pretty hot. It’s like 2/3s of a GNX (seat logo included!), even if its 110 hp output is more like 1/3.
I realize this is an old thread, but I have to add that I owned one of those 1986 Century GS models. I bought it in 2000 for $150, complete and running. I drove it for a year and gave up on it when the trans took a dump. It had a hard life and I didn’t have the time or $$ to fix it up.
They only came in black with the special edition wheels shown in the above pic. The engine was a 3.8 v6 and on the plenum it had the same Grand National type logo that was on the front seat head rests. It was a nice car to look at for sure. It didn’t handle any better than a Century sedan, but it was a hell of a ride on the highway and got super MPG. The 3.8 engine really made this car haul!
The Dodge dart of the 80’s and 90’s. Funny enough as they are both called A-bodies. I have owned no less 6, a 1983 brown Ciera 3.0 liter V6 sedan Brougham, a 1984 light brown Ciera Brougham Tech IV sedan, a 1985 white Ciera 3.0 liter V6 wagon, a 1989 black Ciera sedan with 2.8 V6, a green 1993 Ciera sedan with 3300 V6 and another 1993 light blue Ciera sedan with 3300 V6.
The early cars suffered from the steering rack issue(easily solved by sucking out the old fluid and replacing with half steering fluid and half trans-X), the lock up torque converter solenoid failing (again an easy fix) and the dreaded junk Buick 3.0 181 carbureted V6 that must have had a bottom end made of tin foil. The 1989-93 cars were much better and more reliable, were much quicker and even got better fuel mileage. We would routinely see these at the auctions with 200-300k miles and they still fired right up and ran well.
The fact that I still see numerous 90’s examples on a daily basis and barely a Camry from the same time era in sight in this snow belt of Upstate, NY speaks volumes.
didn’t know this model existed, you’ve added another car to my imaginary garage
I’ve owned 4 of these A-bodies. My first was a rare black 1984 Century Limited Coupe. Loved that car, hated the 3.0 V-6 engine. Needed to be rebuilt twice and by the third time with 80k on the clock I called it quits. I bought another a few years later for only $500 bucks – it was a stripped light blue 1984 Century Custom 4-dr with only 46k on the clock but a blown 3.0 V-6 engine. Figured I could get it fixed cheaply and make some $$ on it but I ended up selling it for what I paid. Never saw it again. I must have a secret love for these cars – in 1995 I found a mint condition, loaded to the gills 1987 Century Limited 4-dr., white with blue interior, 3.8 V-6, every option Buick made as it was special ordered by the owner who had previously only driven Cadillacs before and wanted something smaller. It even had rear seat reading lamps and Twilight Sentinel – I had never seen another Century with those options! Loved that car, drove it for several years until rust started attacking the bottoms of the doors and floor. Lastly, an elderly neighbor of mine had a dark blue 1989 Ciera with only 57k on the clock – garaged until she couldn’t drive any more. Family sold it to me in 2009 for only $500 bucks! It had the 2.8 V-6 but really weird options – tilt, no cruise, alloy wheels, cassette, power locks but no power windows, power trunk release, power driver’s seat…..kept it for about six months. Sadly it was a money pit – all the original parts were failing and it became very unreliable. Sold it for more than twice what I paid ($1200 bucks) but I had put a ton of money into it. I still think these are fantastic cars. There is something about them that makes me still desire one, even today!!
I’ve always thought the coupe versions of these A-bodies were good-looking cars (the later versions like the featured car, not the boxy early coupes.) I don’t think I’d really want to own one unless I needed it as a cheap basic car, and they’re at the age where the math behind that starts to not work, but the late 2-doors are quite handsome.
Curiously, as common as these were in the 80’s and 90’s, I don’t recall having ever ridden in one. Not just the coupe, or the Century–no A-bodies at all that I can recall.
My wife and I own a 92 Century 2 door that looks identical to that white 91. We purchased it from a guy whos father ordered it from a dealer in the Midwest. In the 10 years we have owned it we have never seen another 91 or 92 2dr. Century here in Washington State and only 2 of the Olds versions. It had 120k on it when we got it and we replaced the steering rack, alternator, brakes, spark plugs, anti torque link (dogbone), water pump and rear shocks. At 140k we did the front struts, harmonic balancer and fuel pump. It has been a great car and has always been there for us when we needed it We love it!
There was a Century coupe just like this near work until a couple of years ago.
Good article Paul. In 1986 my mother bought an ’86 Pontiac 6000, much like the Buick only it was a four door, tan with brown interior. Come to think of it, the interior closely resembled the Buick’s. It had the Chevrolet 2.8 V6 with a three speed auto with a transmission lock up feature for better mileage; after a few years the lock up failed and rather than spend the money to fix it she had it disconnected. It’s performance was adequate but not outstanding but on the highway it returned about 28 mpg. Like the Buick, it was a totally bland car, but aside from the transmission issue it never gave her any problems. Certainly a huge improvement from my 1980 Skylark.
Could I please have some vanilla on top of that vanilla? It is too spicy for me.
When these came out, my grandpa had one for a few years, but said it was too boring and replaced it with Sable.
Yawn…
I remember back in’93 hearing that my aunt and uncle got a new Buick, only their 2nd new car ever. Fully expecting to see a shiny new Regal, alas there was a shiny new blue Century in their driveway. My aunt drove it for maybe 10 years, but it was my understanding she had a number of problems with it starting at 60k miles, so it was replaced with a Camry for her last car. I was shocked their GM family went “outside the family”.
I had a 92 and some one ran me and it over at only 126k man she was white with red Interior and I loved her