The early 1990’s was a big decade at Jeep, in all kinds of ways – including making changes. After almost thirty years of continuous production, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer was phased out by Chrysler after the 1991 model run. What would the world look like without a Grand Wagoneer in Jeep showrooms? It seems that Chrysler was afraid to find out and introduced one as a 1993 model. What – you didn’t notice? It seems that you had a lot of company.
AMC’s Jeep operation had quite a decade in the 1980’s. After starting out with the CJ and the Wagoneer, both essentially 1960’s designs, the new XJ Cherokee made its debut for 1983. Jeep’s timing was fortuitous, as this was almost exactly the time when America began to fall out of love with the station wagon and in love with the SUV. The old Wagoneer (which became the Grand Wagoneer) stayed around, but mainly because rich people insisted on throwing large wads of cash at the company in order to keep buying them. AMC was willing to wring money out of the past, but knew that the XJ Cherokee was the future.
Around the time the XJ hit showrooms, AMC began work on its eventual replacement. In what it called the “XJC” Project, the company sought design proposals from three outsiders—Larry Shinoda, Alain Clenet, and Giorgetto Giugiaro. By 1986, work on the Cherokee’s successor began in earnest with the latest advances in computer design and Francois Castaing’s Product Lifestyle Management design and production system. This system was designed to speed development of new models by designing efficiencies into the cycle rather than to cut costs out of it while work was going on.
The ZJ Cherokee was well underway when Chrysler acquired AMC and progress continued. The next generation Cherokee began to take on a recognizable form in the 1989 Jeep Concept 1 show car. The ZJ was most likely intended to replace both the small XJ and the ancient SJ, that therefor took on dimensions that more-or-less split the difference between the two. As the car’s launch date approached, it became clear that the XJ’s continued success meant that it was not going away. Instead, it was the old SJ Wagoneer that had been put out to pasture the previous year, so why not offer a version that would cater specifically to those who might miss Old Faithful?
The 1993 Grand Wagoneer would essentially be a trim package at the top, top, top end of what was already an aggressively priced new SUV. The new Grand Wagoneer would be a Grand Cherokee Limited, only with the addition of the 5.2L V8 as standard equipment and with a uniquely luxurious interior.
Of course, it would not be a proper Grand Wagoneer without the exterior trimmed with woodgrain, so that was included too. $29,996 would be the cost of entry to this most rarified of Grand Cherokees – about a $1,300 premium over the already steep Grand Cherokee in Limited trim. For another comparison, the new GW was also nearly $200 more than the MSRP had been for the old 1991 Grand Wagoneer.
It turned out that a new Grand Wagoneer was not what America’s SUV buyers were seeking. At least not THIS new Grand Wagoneer. OK, it actually was what 6,378 of America’s SUV buyers were seeking, but that was not much compared with the 250,143 copies of the ZJ with a Grand Cherokee name on its painted steel flanks. It was, however, more than the 4,253 1991 “Final Editions” of the old SJ Grand Wagoneer. But in any case, the Grand Wagoneer would exit Jeep dealers at the end of the 1993 model run, not to return until the recently introduced 2022 model.
Perhaps Chrysler was not trying very hard to sell the new GW. While it got a two-page spread in the Jeep full-line catalog, that seems to have been about it. It did not get a mention in the Grand Cherokee brochure and does not appear to have gotten a brochure of its own. Oh well, at least the full-line catalog told us about all there was to know about this model: the seats were described as a “biscuit pattern” and that both an overhead console and automatic temperature control were standard.
This had not actually been AMC’s (or Chrysler’s) first try at weaning GW buyers off of the ancient Kaiser-era platform. The XJ Cherokee had been offered in “Wagoneer” and “Wagoneer Limited” versions from 1983 to 1990. They may have made for particularly luxurious Cherokees, but their volumes did not tempt the company to axe the old cash cow.
I have found myself with a bit of free time, and have been looking back through my photo stash for some old things I never got around to writing up. This is one, and it deserves its day. Like many of you, I had forgotten all about these when I saw this one. When I saw the nameplates, I knew that I had to photograph it.
This may have been the last one of these I ever saw. Grand Cherokees were still relatively common sightings a decade ago, but that has changed. For whatever reason, these never developed the rabid fan base of the XJ Cherokee, examples of which are still seen from time to time. Not to mention the even more rabid fan base of the old SJ Grand Wagoneer, with prime examples relatively common and available for sums that make their original MSRP seem like a bargain.
No, the ZJ Grand Cherokee seems to have gone the way of most Ford Explorers, with a few pampered examples still around but not many others. At least in my own experience. Given the rust showing on this example, it is a pretty safe bet that it has been turned into a Hyundai Sonata or a Samsung refrigerator since these photos were taken.
Jeep struck gold with the original Wagoneer – a utility vehicle that became a luxury icon. It is hoping to do so again, with a new edition introduced in 2022. That new version’s introductory base price of $59,995 is actually a little cheaper than the old one after adjusting for inflation, but they make up for it by making versions that crack six-figures on the window sticker.
This ZJ version of the Grand Wagoneer was not such a gold-strike. Unless you shoot on-the-street (or in-the-parking lot) photos of curbside classics. Because in this context, a 1993 Grand Wagoneer, in all its leather and woodgrain glory, is gold indeed.
Further Reading:
Eight slots???
NO!
These have almost completely disappeared. The survival rate for any 30 year-old SUV, designed to be driven in salt and snow, is going to be low. Further compounded, by 1990s Chrysler quality, poor mileage, and tight interior accommodations. Seriously dedicated fans, would comprise much of the owner base. Rave reviews when new. Like many Mopar products, at the time. If this one is miraculously still on the road, it is a genuine survivor.
I have read that some of Chrysler’s body electrical systems were problematic as these aged, so maybe that’s part of it.
Plus second and third owners, had less financial means, to maintain them. Still seen, starting to show their wear, in the earliest Google Streetview captures.
Keeping one in top shape cost money. The electrical system was indeed weak and the HVAC caused no end of problems in these cars. The brakes were marginal in our hilly location.
The basic drive train was quite reliable. It was stuff like leaky seals that cost money to keep at bay. Heaven forbid oil gets dripped on the garage floor!
I have to say that without actually writing it all down in a table or something, there’s no way I personally could keep track of what these vehicles were/are and how Jeep (plus whoever) shifted around the same names for different models and/or trim packages. It seems that way too liberal uses of “Grand”, “Wagoneer” and the letter J made for a mishmash of models. I recall back in the day being constantly perplexed as to just which vehicle was being described when someone said they had or were looking at a “Grand Wagoneer Cherokee Limited XZJ”. I just knew it was one of those Jeep SUV things.
It just seems to me that if a company is trying to sell to a mass market audience, maybe the FIRST thing they want to avoid is confusing the heck out of the customer before they even get a chance to drive one of the things.
I have shared your confusion. Laredos and Limiteds and all the other trim levels were something I could never keep straight. Perhaps if I had owned one I might have been able to pay attention. When I saw this one, I remember thinking that the wood trim looked normal. Only when I saw the Grand Wagoneer badge did my mind tell me to take another look.
Exactly, Jeff. I’m glad I’m not the only one who felt like this. I’m not even sure they sold these in my country, but I remember seeing them in US magazines.
Their model names were confusing (unless you were a Jeep person, perhaps) and that’s not the way to attract new customers.
Chrysler/FCA/Stellantis uses “Grand” willy-nilly. At various times, it’s meant a LWB version, a fancier trim level with no mechanical or body differences, or even a completely unrelated vehicle!
Those overstuffed leather seats in that fleshy color look like a scene from that show about bariatric surgery.
I will never be able to look at seats like these again without thinking of this, um, medical angle.
Ha! Sorry about that!
Oh my, overstuffed wrinkly leather in light tan with pleats and folds. You’re right, they have a look of dysfunctional anatomy to them! Like with people, you really don’t want to know what is in those folds over time when cleaning has been neglected.
*My 600 Pound Life- a morbidly fascinating show!
For that matter, the GC Limited could be had with the same beige leather but in a tauter, more modern/”Euro” sew pattern with fewer unfortunate associations.
Really, that style of High Brougham floofy pillow upholstery only ever worked in velour or other fabrics, preferably in a color more gold than taupe as the brownscale option.
Yes! Good point! Come to think of it, I never thought of the interior of the Continental Mark V Diamond Jubilee Edition that way because that was not available in leather.
Hummmmmm. It’s a common guess in my house, if I’m caught watching TV that I’m either watching M 600# L … or Air Disasters. It’s always one or the other.
So yeah, it’s the Grand Wagoneer Surgical Recovery XJ Cherokee Edition.
I Know a lot of Explorers of this era went to an early grave due to Cash 4 Clunkers. I wonder if a lot of ZJ had the same fate.
In the western US the first generation ZJ Grand Cherokee is still a very common sight. The woodgrain Grand, not so much. First and second gen Explorers are pretty much non-existent now. By the way JP, you wrote that the Explorer was already a success in 1986 when the ZJ was being developed but of course the Ford came out in 1991.
In the northeast, most of those were already rusted out anyway and C4C just put them out of their misery.
According to the official list, some 23,316 ZJs met their end from C4C. 1st and 2nd gen Explorers were 13,184 and 44,539, respectively (45,687 if you count the 2001-03 Explorer Sports).
The last one of these that I recall seeing was in the junkyard…An interesting and relatively cheap experiment for Jeep if nothing else, but it pretty much answered the question about if Di-Noc is appropriate on modern-styled vehicles. Presumably that’s the reason the new GW doesn’t have it this time around, there was a time and place for it and as iconic as it is on the up-to-91 GW it doesn’t do anything for any of them after that.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/junkyard/curbside-recycling-1993-jeep-grand-wagoneer-zj-the-last-new-grand-wagoneer-didnt-last/
PS: One minor correction: The Explorer wasn’t having explosive success in 1986, it was but a glimmer in a Ford marketer’s eye, being intro’d five years later…
Thanks for the fact check, that’s now fixed.
I remember that Chrysler was still offering wood on minivans until quite late, but don’t recall when they quit. I suspect it’s time will come again, in only as a short retro fad.
It’s true, the woodgrain looks out of place on newer type vehicles, but I still think Jeep should offer it. A minority of Wagoneer buyers would probably love it.
There is at least one company doing aftermarket upgrades on new Wagoneers:
https://www.musclecarsandtrucks.com/jeep-grand-wagoner-wagonmaster-wood-panel-kit/
Too bad you couldn’t get some more shots of the 2g Eclipse or Talon in the background of the fifth picture.
By the spoiler that’s an Eclipse. I think it’s an RS. I had a 2g Talon for 17 years.
The XJ Wagoneer Limited with its different grille, headlight arrangement and red taillights seemed like a better effort than these, despite ostensibly being further upmarket. These in execution look more like something a dealer would have applied to a regular Grand Cherokee.
On the whole I think the styling of the ZJ was attractive enough, it still had a rugged look to its stance tires and seemingly standard auxiliary fog lights, which it’s softly styled successors completely lost, but it was a poor replacement for the SJ and a Ho hum would-be replacement for the XJ. They were very popular in the Chicago suburbs growing up but they certainly weren’t cherished like latter two, which are either sought after collectibles (SJ) or popular project off roaders(XJ). Grand Cherokees now are almost extinct. Grand Wagoneers? Last one I remember seeing I was probably in middle school
To echo what Jeff wrote above, I’m afraid I got lost by Jeep’s everchanging nomenclature, that this one slipped out of my memory. I was aware that this car existed, but to me it was known as “that 1990s Jeep with wood trim.” I forgot they actually called it the Grand Wagoneer.
I suppose the Jeep folks thought that wood trim plus a V-8 would replicate the old Grand Wagoneer’s cachet. But the Nantucket and Palm Beach weren’t swayed – a misjudgment similar to GM’s ill-fated downsizing attempts, but much less embarrassing.
I was a Mopar service advisor when there were still lots of these things around. Circa 1995, they were the go to of the upper crust set, since Range Rover and the like hadn’t really caught on. They were a handy size, could tow a pretty big trailer and could fit in a smallish garage.
They were also hideously unreliable and we joked “Grand Cherokee” meant the owner spent a grand on it every visit, which was largely true. As long as we had the cars fixed by 3:00 PM, customers had no problems tossing large sums at them.
The new generation that came out in 2000 was a complete, unmitigated disaster that killed off the snooty set buyers who rightly thought they had been swindled out of $50,000. The brakes were so bad they were dangerous. It was this vehicle that killed the dealership at which I worked.