The 1987 Chevrolet Beretta was a big deal. It marked a return to a 2-door compact Chevrolet that was something more than just a sedan afterthought. It also saw Chevrolet move out of the boxy styling that was so-1980 and into the smoothly styled mainstream of the 90’s. It did not, however change Chevy’s trajectory in any significant way in a world where the competition was no longer just Ford, but also Toyota, Nissan and Honda. Still, it could have been worse.
The word Beretta is cool. Or it evokes cool things. I remember in the 1970’s there was a television show called Beretta. Robert Blake was a hip, cool kind of detective. He dressed in a “like, way out, baby” kind of way, and was the kind of character cool enough to have a parrot or a cockatoo or some kind of bird. (I am not sure – my little sister watched the show more than I did – maybe I wasn’t cool enough.) People who have birds are either really nerdly or really cool. Robert Blake’s Beretta was the second kind. OK, I just looked it up and it was actually spelled Baretta. But it sounds the same and my mental free-association remains unaffected.
Then there is the Italian pistol. I am not a gun guy, but there is something about a Beretta that makes it the hip and cool firearm as opposed to the steely, efficient German Glock or the American classic brought to mind by a Colt. It was easy to imagine the guy with a Beretta as the stealthy assassin in the movie who is smarter than the bad guys he’s trying to knock off and the cops trying to catch him.
Then there is this car. When it came out I immediately associated it with the two examples above. The new cool Chevy compact coupe – this was what my mind said to me when I first heard about it. It was clearly more cool than the Corsica, the sedan that tried to bring a Mediterranean vibe with its name, never mind the thrashy powertrains and leaden handling that GM cars in the lower price ranges were becoming famous for.
In truth I kind of liked the style of the Beretta. Not enough to look into buying one of them – I had moved beyond my sporty-new-car infatuation of the mid 80’s by the time these were out, and was back into my automotive happy place with a 1966 Fury III sedan. So no Beretta for me, thank you.
It did look like Chevrolet was getting serious about taking on the aero dominance of the day’s Ford Motor Company, as well as the quite modern offerings coming from Lee Iacocca’s Chrysler. The Beretta was the first Chevrolet that made me admire its styling in quite a few years. Remember when beautiful cars in a Chevrolet showroom were something we took for granted? As I think about it, if we ignore Corvettes, we might have to go back to the 1970 Monte Carlo or maybe the 1967 Impala to find a Chevy with styling that really moved me. The Beretta was not in the same league as those cars, but it was not at all a bad effort for The General of the 1980’s.
In truth, as years went on I kind of forgot about the Beretta. As one who moved from my ’66 Plymouth into the ’88 Accord (which I was fortunate enough to marry) there was nothing about the Beretta that was relevant to my life. It was neither the old-school sled that was my sentimental favorite, nor the smooth and refined kind of car that was well along the way to colonizing the world for the Japanese manufacturers. And once the kids started coming, any case to be made for a car like a Beretta pretty much vanished, never to return.
The poor Beretta seemed (to me, at least) to be the car that did nothing particularly well, but which would get a young person of modest means to work and back every day in a reliable if unexciting and undistinguished kind of way. But that was often enough, and those of us who lived in the land of the GM employee purchase plan saw these things on the road by the gross. Often with white or metallic blue paint having peeled from their horizontal surfaces in great sheets.
I had kind of forgotten that there were versions of the Beretta which tried to stir the kind of pride of ownership that once came naturally to the owner of a new Chevrolet, but was reminded one sunny Saturday morning some years back when I came across this one.
Everyone remembers that Chevy offered a Nova SS, but who remembers that the Beretta got a similar treatment? Maybe the problem was that there were so many of them. In addition to the basic GT available at the 1987 intro, there were the 1988-89 GTU . . .
and the 1990-93 GTZ. All of these came with the usual confusing combinations of engines and transmissions from the GM parts bin, such as the Olds Quad 4, the 3.1 V6, a Getrag-designed 5 speed or a 3 speed automatic. In magazine tests of the day these sportier models were pronounced as decent performers with underwhelming interiors. One reviewer with Popular Science Magazine decided that the dash reminded him of one in a Nash that had been owned by his grandparents.
Oh yes, we mustn’t forget the 1990 Indy edition to commemorate a Beretta being chosen as the Pace Car for the Indianapolis 500. Or a heavily modified Beretta-ish one-off convertible being chosen as the Pace Car. But this retail version was popular enough in its time.
Chevy tried to make some sense out of the lineup in 1994 when the GT and GTZ were replaced by the Z26. Everyone knew what a Z-28 was, and now there would be a Cavalier Z24, a Lumina Z34 and this one slotted neatly between them. The 3.1 V6 became the 3100 V6 and was offered solely with a new 4 speed automatic. The Quad 4 (manual only) hung around for one last year before going away. The new Z26 wasn’t the all-out performer the GTZ had been, but then maybe this was not a market niche where that mattered so much.
I have no idea whether this one is a ’94, a ’95 or an end-of-the-line 1996 model – it has been too long since I chatted with its owner in my bank parking lot. I also do not recall seeing the car around later – as I recall, the middle-age female owner didn’t drive it much as it was her “fun car”.
I don’t know why I decided to take pictures of this one – maybe just that it was in such great condition and that it was a top-of-the-line version that was not very common in my part of the world. I only wish my then-current cellphone camera could have done a better job with this clean, shiny black car on a bright sunny morning.
Maybe I also had some instinctive understanding that this was the last time Chevrolet tried to recapture its glory days in this segment – one that would soon be replaced by the horrid 1997 Malibu, a dullard appliance if ever there was one.
In this car I saw a worthy successor to the old Nova SS of the 1970’s. Yes, it had been an unassuming compact powered with off-the-shelf components, but Chevy had a pretty component shelf in those days and the Nova SS became a favorite of the performance crowd as time went on. It was not the Beretta’s fault that Chevy’s parts bin wasn’t what it had once been. Which is probably why Chevrolet was well along the path to becoming the perennial USA-2 (if that).
The Beretta may have suffered from its many compromises, but this shiny black Z26 still offered a flicker of Chevrolet’s former glory in the way the old Vaudeville performers in their last days could still bring smiles and applause from new audiences in the 1970’s. The Beretta was never my thing when they were new, but this particular one makes me smile and appreciate that it was somebody’s thing and that somebody treated it so well for so long. I don’t know if I would want to “See the USA” in it, but it does give me a hankering for a slice of apple pie.
Further Reading:
1987-1996 Chevrolet Beretta – Latchkey Kid (William Stopford)
1996 Chevrolet Beretta – A Touch Of Sportiness (Richard Bennett)
I had a professor with a teal ‘94 V6 and a co-worker with an aqua Indy edition. They both were wildly sub-par at the price point. Indy owner was a clone of his car; loud, brash, crude.
Super cool wheels on the Z26, to my eyes. I’m a total bow tie homer but hadn’t thought about the Beretta for some time. Well done, J P
The quinoa of cars.
Nah quinoa is high in protein, fiber, and good for you. It tastes like whatever you put on it. A 90s Chevy is none of those things.
A Volvo 240 is what comes to mind.
fully cognizant of every thing that GM does wrong…i view the beretta exterior as very good. hold the cladding for sure..but a sharp clean front.stylish integrated looking rear,good profile that dies not scream FWD coupe….
Welcome back, JPC! I haven’t seen your name attached to the byline in a while. In fact, I had to get to the comments to be sure this wasn’t a re-run.
A couple of years ago, I ran across a young (like 16 years old) man who had a perfectly preserved 1992(?) Beretta, a four cylinder version in bright red. I later found out he was still working on getting his driving license and had stopped at the Subway sub shop while getting some driving practice with his mother as his licensed driver/instructor. I remarked to them that I hadn’t seen such a well-preserved Beretta in a very long time here in Rust Country (TM).
I believe he said it was his grandmother’s car and you could see he was highly excited to have: 1.) his own car at 16 and 2.) something that wasn’t the current day beater or parental unit cars that you would normally see kids like him driving.
He had rather detailed plans to get the car completely ready to drive (it had been sitting for a while) and to further enhance it, too. I don’t recall exactly what the plans were, but there was mention of subwoofers and my mind kind of shut off then. OTOH, I wasn’t a whole lot different at 17 with my first car, too. Headers, big fat tires and a sound system burdened a very worn out 1969 Ford Torino GT in 1980…
Honestly, I was happier to see that there was a young person who was interested in cars and not just another iAndroid phone or PlayBox gaming platform than I was the Beretta.
A side note: The Baretta TV show was playing off the popularity of the Serpico movie from the mid-1970’s. Kind of like all of the “Dirty Harry”/anti-hero type cop riffs that network TV was doing back then, too.
Thanks Geo, I seem to be able to get something out every couple of months now. My work situation is much more demanding of my time than it has been in quite awhile. I should have more free time in Covid-land, but that is not what’s happening. Oh well. Now that this one has finally seen the light of day I need to decide what comes next.
I am quite sure that if this had been a base-trim Beretta I would never have stopped to take a picture. These were cars good for background scenes and not much else, in my estimation. But this one being a Z26 and in such sparkling condition made me look. The automotive market matured quite a lot during the Beretta’s long run, but I don’t think the styling ever wore out on these.
When these first came out, I loved the GT model, and I tried to talk my dad into buying one…he bought a T-Bird instead, which turned out to be better in my opinion anyway (rear-drive, 302-powered, NASCAR styling). It’s amazing how often cars seem to disappear from the road without your noticing it, but Berettas used to pop up about every 14 seconds. Then they were gone!
A few months ago, I dug through my brochure collection and found the original Beretta brochure – I still think the GT looks good, especially in red, dark gray, or that blue that peeled off within six months or so.
I thought you would have mentioned the trademark battle between the gun maker and GM when I saw that ad! Clearly GM had to been aware of the gun maker, and thought that the classes of goods were distinct enough to avoid confusion (e.g., Delta faucets and Delta airlines). According to the NY Times (https://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/26/business/company-news-gm-and-beretta-settle-lawsuit.html) GM was able to use the name for automobiles. GM donated $500K to a Beretta charity and a Chevrolet Beretta in return for a Beretta rifle and shotgun.
I wonder where those items are today?
I wish I could find a photo of that ceremony. Beretta S.p.A. had some fun with that one, and spun it into a good PR move.
Incidentally one of the other automotive trademark-infringement suits of that time also had an amusing outcome. Toyota was sued by the Lexis legal-research group (oh, what a great entity to be sued by…) over the use of the Lexus name. Lexis lost, but the following year, they held a contest for its lawyer members where the grand prize was… an Infiniti. The headline went something like “Win an Infiniti from Lexis.”
Yeah, that Lexis battle was pretty silly. They must have found some attorneys willing to take it on contingency. 🙂
I bought a base Beretta new in 1989 and drove it for 8 years and 150,000 miles. It was cleanly styled and, in the deep metallic maroon paint I chose, a looker.
What made this a viable new-car choice is that for just a little more money than what Ford, Chevy, and Dodge/Plymouth were offering as entry-level transportation, you could get a whole lot more car. Bigger, better handling, more stylish. Not that the Beretta was a fabulous handler, it was average. But it was way better than those entry-level cars.
You used the word “leaden” for the handling of GM’s entry level cars. On the same day I test drove the Beretta, I test drove a Cavalier — and even though the two cars used the same engine the Cav was a dog and the Beretta seemed to just sparkle in comparison.
Ha, I was just looking at the Beretta in Jim’s book. Yes, Jim has a book out.
I don’t think I ever looked at or rode in a Beretta in the day. By that point our 1980’s GM vehicles had turned the Mark of Excellence into the Mark of Excremence for me.
Yes, Jim has a book out.
Really? What’s it called? I couldn’t find it by Googling.
Well let me plug it here then! I collected a bunch of my early personal essays and stories into a volume called A Place to Start. Available at Amazon, Apple Books, Google Play, and elsewhere.
http://jimgrey.net/midnightstarpress/a-place-to-start/
Indeed a car that pretty much stayed in the background of the automotive landscape, at least out here in California. I don’t know if the same was true nationally, but the GrandAm in all its plastic-clad glory was far more popular than the much more cleanly styled Beretta, which I guess says something about the taste of car buyers. And quite a few of those GrandAms are still around. Don’t think I’ve seen a Beretta – or Lumina – for a long time.
Growing up in Midwestern Rural Big 3 Country I can only recall two of these.
One early model that a classmate looked into seriously buying (used) – his family had a good relationship with the dealer and was allowed to take it home overnight. The car blew a head gasket before he could even decide whether he wanted to buy it or not.
The other was a BRAND NEW Z26 (had to be a 1994-95 model) bought by the only kid who had a good enough after-school/weekend/summer job to afford one. Yeah we were jealous but then most of us were either struggling along with sad 1980s 4 cyl or V8s that barely matched or were outpaced in power output by the V6 under his hood.
Great to see you back with us, JPC!
I briefly (15 months) had one of these. Equipped with the cloth/velour interior, 3.1 V6 engine, 4 speed automatic, top of the line factory AM/FM/EQ “Concert Hall” stereo.
After replacing the 40K miles used up, worn out struts will Boge (or was it Billstein?) replacement units and adding a set of used Michelin XZX tires; the car was better than just ok. It handled sprightly, much better than my buddy’s Escort GT , rode great over the potholed littered streets.
The slowly burning out rear resonator/muffler gave the car an almost like a Jaguar growl to it.
The V6/4 speed automatic powertrain was quite peppy in city traffic conditions, always willing to downshift one or two gears and take off.
Typically excellent GM #HVAC system; much appreciated in Hot & Humid New Orleans.
The seat & interior was comfortable for my 6-1 230 pound self.
I would had kept it longer, perhaps as a long term back up/loaner car for family and friends, but a drunk/high/terminally stupid tourist barrelled thru a stop light and T-boned it.
IIRC the tv show was called Baretta with an “A” not Beretta like the italian gun maker
Anyway, nice article
Sorry. My mistake. The article makes it perfectly clear that the show is called Baretta.
Great article — I see Berettas occasionally, but most seem to be on their last legs. Earlier this year, I did catch this end-of-the-line ’96 model, but didn’t get many pictures of it.
I liked Berettas, but they always seemed to fall just outside my purchase parameters… but they were certainly more interesting than what came afterwards.
Thanks for this walk down memory lane! Berettas are almost non-existent now in Central Ohio.
In ‘93, I bought an ‘89 base model Beretta in red with V6 and auto. Having traded up from my trusty ‘84 Chevette, I was pretty pleased with myself… for awhile. I especially liked the looks, but it was a pretty good performer in spite of having only 125 HP. It was usually dependable, but when it did break down, the repair was usually not cheap. Over the 10 years I had it, it consumed 2 transmissions, two fuel pumps, an ignition module, one or two ECMs, an alternator and a fuel pressure regulator. I’m sure there were a couple of other unexpected repair items. For the most part, wear items like brakes, exhaust, batteries and tires seemed to last as expected. When the transmission started going out for the second time in 2003, engine, body and paint were still in good shape, but I’d had enough!
My Beretta was fun while it lasted, but it isn’t really a car I’d like to own again. Still, seeing a nice one makes me smile:
The Beretta was a decently styled car on the outside, I recall specifically liking the GTZ mono-colored one with those fat 5-spoke wheels. But only in white. OK, and maybe black. The all-red (name it Gloria?) one was a little much but made sense too I suppose although I don’t think I ever saw an actual one in red. I’ve never driven one, or any Beretta for that matter though.
The Malibu replaced the Corsica, but I don’t think the Beretta ever really got a replacement, did it? Cav/Cobalt on the lower end and then the Monte above it, right? Funny that there’s actually a Malibu parked right next to it here.
Even though the RWD X-Bodied Nova and the FWD X-Bodied Citation were the FWD L-Bodied Corsica and Beretta predecessors, the Beretta (also Corsica’s) replacement ironically was the Malibu parked next to the Beretta from your photo JP Cavanaugh. All in all today’s Malibu and its previous generations dating back from 1997 were in all actuality the 1962-79 Nova’s “spiritual” niche’ successors. This lineage might be done by 2022 and maybe replaced by an unnamed wagon SUV similar to the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross & Ford Mustang Mach-E
@ jim grey, I agree with you completely. These were great first new cars for entry level buyers who wanted something youthful, stylish, and easy on the wallet, but roomy and practical without seeming like your great aunt’s tempaz or k car. A friend bought one of these new when they first came out and of course as a 12 year old this car seemed amazingly sporty and snazzy. Chrysler had the Sundance, which didn’t seem as youthful and ford had the mustang and probe which weren’t as practical or the escort gt. This filled a nice niche and I think was cheaper than the grand am.
The interior seemed pretty chintzy though. I think Chevy stopped promoting these some time in the early 90s. The corsica never turned into the accord beater it should have been and quickly became a rental car fleet staple. Durable, but not desirable.
The Corsica coupe. Having driven a very early Corsica rental made it impossible for me to warm up the slightest to the 2-door version. The constant stream of different “sporty” versions had an air of desperation about it. “Oh, this isn’t working; let’s try a new letter or number combination”. This alone was one of GM’s serious sins with this car. Why not just have one designation for the sporty version (“SS” perhaps?) and stick with it, and make it meaningful. These constant changes just proved how insecure GM was at the time, and it really undermined the mediocre image these cars had.
The retirement of the SS series during this era was a mystery. I wonder if the SS sort of fell victim to the performance worship crowd, who didn’t want to see it “debased”. But ultra-performance wasn’t what it had started out as at all. An Impala SS with a 283/Glide was nothing unusual at all. Or the early 6 cylinder Nova SS.
Your point was made to me in the way I had to research these, and had completely forgotten all about the GT, the GTU, the GTZ and even this one before I took the pictures. These were that maddening 80s combination for GM where there were some sound basic components and some really nice styling let down in a major way by things like the lack of a modern 4 speed auto from the start and Dollar General interiors.
Jim, I admire your ability (fortitude?) in tackling an article about a Beretta. Like was stated, it was always just sort of there.
I never drove one, I never rode in one, but did know a few people who owned one. That’s the extent of what I can say about a Beretta.
I will admit that it took me a long time to get to it. 🙂
Liked them then, then didn’t care, now solidly back in the “like” column for the Chevy Beretta. Friends who owned them would talk about the little things breaking (like a sunroof that wouldn’t stay open and would bang shut over potholes, just for one example). It was their ubiquity in the GM town where I grew up that eroded my paying attention to them. I started noticing them again a few years ago, I think they have terrific style.
It’s funny that the lead photo has the reborn Malibu parked next to it, which replaced the Corsica. I can’t imagine how dreadful a coupe based on that Malibu (as a replacement for the Beretta) would have looked.
I bought a new Corsica in 1988.
Having driven both Beretta and Corsica, I liked Corsica’s ride just a little bit better, plus – more importantly, we’d had our first child and the extra doors came in handy.
I think it took until the 2014 Impala for me to find a GM FWD that looked as attractive to my eyes as the Beretta/Corsica, although the 2008-12 Malibu looks very good in the right color. I just wish the Beretta/Corsica had been built more to the standards GM held to with the ’08-’12 ‘Bu and final Impalas.
After a few early ’90s Mustangs, all bought new, my BIL who at the time had a 90mi daily commute, decided to change it up and bought a new Beretta. That car left him walking more times than he can remember. He considered it a godsend when it got rear ended, and couldn’t get to the Ford dealer fast enough for another new Mustang.
My third-year university roommate (“Hah! Ah’m Vaughn, f’n Tinnessee! Mah daddy’s a preacher, lak his daddy wuz ‘n’ ah’m gom be! Ah neyver met a Jyewish person b’fowur!” as he fixed his gaze on my scalp, presumably looking for the horns) had one of these. Even though I was one o’ thim thar heathen unBelievers he let me
dravdrive it a few times. It was only a year or two old, without many miles on it, but it felt like a 10- or 15-year-old beater. Visibly sloppy build; switches and controls that felt as though long past their break-before date; creaks and rattles everywhere; a balky, deeply unpleasant shifter and clutch; that dumb gargle muffler GM put on almost everything that didn’t have a “Brougham” or “d’Elegance” badge…it was such a stupid car on its own, as thrown together, that the NASCAR stickers Vaughn had plastered all over it really didn’t make much difference.And oh, how very very sick to damn death I quickly grew of that pathetic “Heartbeat of America” ad campaign.
(At least the ’70s television show made a positive contribution to the culture; we all got to learn what “jamoke” meant.)
“And oh, how very very sick to damn death I quickly grew of that pathetic “Heartbeat of America” ad campaign.”
Mr. Stern, I propose that you and I go into business making “USA-2” license plates to sell to the Chevrolet car-show faithful. We won’t make much money but it will be a fun way to spend time in the shade under a vendor’s tent. 🙂
Seriously, the “Like A Rock” campaign was the one that irritated me. You really want to take on the identity of a featureless immobile lump for your car company?
Ugh, yeah, that one, too. Obnoxious, right from the start.
As for the USA-2 licence plate idea: I donno, people get shot for less in that country.
Arrrgghh! I loathed the “Like A Rock” campaign immediately because I went to the University of Windsor, just across the river from Detroit, where I was subjected to more Bob Seger airplay than I could stand.
To this day my rule for wedding receptions is when the DJ plays “Old Time Rock N Roll” that’s my cue to head for home.
“To this day my rule for wedding receptions is when the DJ plays “Old Time Rock N Roll” that’s my cue to head for home.”
Phew, times two, good buddy! Obviously, Seger is basically the Beatles of Michigan, but 43 years of the same 10 hits or so grates on a guy. I’ll toss this one back over the border at ya, Doug, but I can’t stand “Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald.” I don’t mind Gord, but that song makes me want to punch something.
At least you guys restrict your teeth-grating songs to weddings or occasional airplay. The Beatles’ Happy Birthday makes me want to rip my ears off every. single. time. I know lots of people of the Beatles’ demographic who have birthdays. Pity me.
“Beatles demographic” seems to be just about everybody…
Our solution to crappy wedding DJs was just to have our wedding reception at our local bar with a great jukebox. No freakin’ Electric Slide for you jerks.
That being said, I still love “Fitzgerald” but I know I’m in a very, very small minority on that one.
I test drove one of these in 1987, when I was looking for a replacement for my unreliable 1986 Jetta.
Talk about underwhelming! The steering was every bit as bad as the Citation and interior was just garbage. It was night and day compared to my VW.
The extent of my recollection of these cars is that I always kind of liked the outside door handles’ position. Other than that I always kind of figured they were Corsicas in slightly different clothing.
At the time these were new-ish I was a baby, and when they were walking off the block I was 7 and didn’t have much of an opinion one way or the other. My parents were generally more apt to buy Fords presumably because the one new car they’d bought to that point, incidentally enough – a 1991 Corsica, required 3 separate engines in 6k miles: the engine from the factory and two separate replacements. After much adieu my mom insisted, and ultimately prevailed in getting Chevrolet to buy the thing back under Minnesota’s lemon-law.
I’ve always like those wheels. Neighbor across the street has a red Beretta that’s been sitting in their driveway since around 2012.
Another half baked product from GM. These two cars are nice looking but crappy paint, crappy engines and most with three speed automatics when a lot of the competition offered 4speed automatics. I remember how hard GM was pushing the Quad 4 engine and it was a pretty good design for the time but they got cute with the crankcase ventilation system and the engines would build up lots of condensation crud in them. One of the modifications was to drill large holes in the top side of the oil pickup to prevent oil starvation on start up. So much condensation that it would settle out in the bottom of the oil pan and freeze, blocking the oil pickup.
“Or a heavily modified Beretta-ish one-off convertible being chosen as the Pace Car.”
IIRC, a Beretta convertible had been scheduled for introduction as a 1990 model – and Chevrolet even briefly dropped the Cavalier convertible in anticipation of it – but that one-off Pace Car was the only Beretta ragtop that the public ever saw.
I remember when these first came out. They really “popped” as far as looks went. Suddenly all the other cars looked stodgy and plain. Around 1990 a neighbor gave me a few bucks to install an upgraded CD/Stereo to his dark gray Beretta. I was surprised to find that I really disliked what seemed to be a tall dash, low seats, and a faraway windshield. Up to that point I had been in mostly boxy-ish cars and trucks with more of an upright windshield, and didn’t care for the new direction of that interior. As I was installing the radio, I tried to reconcile my love of the outside with my dislike of the inside. When I was done the owner asked if I wanted to drive it, as I had mentioned what a sharp car it was. I made an excuse to not drive it because I just couldn’t wait to get out of it. Having been in endless aero-raked-windshielded things since I might not mind it now, but whenever I see a swoopy shape I remember the awkward ergonomics of the Beretta. But I still think its a looker. On the outside. Never did drive a Beretta or Corsica and I’m okay with that.
My 90 Quad 4 GTZ I bought right out of high school back in 2005… saved money over the next few summers for a brand new crate motor, 92+ trans w/ LSD, lowered suspension, misc. bolt ons/mods, new interior and paint job. Still have this car, along with my first (93 GT), 89 GTU, and a 95 Z26. Love these cars along with several other GM oddballs (Auroras, Fieros, etc).
Nice collection! I love my 88 GTU manual w 45k on it
Looking to purchase Chevrolet Beretta
Any year, however
Gtu preferred with ground effects.
Best condition possible
Thank you