There are replicas and there are replicas. The difference is clear. Remember those Fieros dressed in unconvincing plastic Testarossa or Countach kits? The Superformance GT40 is the other kind of replica: built with care, almost indistinguishable from the original, improved in some discreet ways and worth a pretty penny, though not quite as much as the real thing.
I found this exceptional machine on yet another Sunday at the Jingu Gaien, the Tokyo equivalent of a unicorn parade ground. The concentration of Lambos, McLarens and Ferraris on this stretch of road is always unusually high, so the GT40 looked right at home size-wise. But it really stood out by its curvaceous and cleaner styling. Hypercars are so fiddly these days.
For those who want to know about the history of the original Ford GT40, CContibutor Aaron65 wrote up a very nice post about this absolute legend, illustrated by one of the hallowed survivors housed at the Ford Museum. But in a nutshell, the GT40 was created by Carroll Shelby in 1962-63 with the express goal of winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans, which it did in 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969.
Only 105 original Ford GT40s were made in both England and the United States over five years; if you absolutely want one, prices are currently in the $10 million range. This leaves a lot of pent-up demand, but luckily, there has been a cottage industry of GT40 replicas and kit cars pretty much since 1980.
But there was always one replica maker head and shoulders above the rest. Initially, that was Safir Engineering, who bought out the GT40 trademark along with three unfinished GT40 chassis. Safir made those into Mark Vs and then started producing new GT40s, with slight upgrades, carrying on from the original car’s numbering.
In 1996, Safir licensed the GT40 design to Superformance, a US-registered replica make whose products, which also includes Cobras and C2 Corvettes, are actually manufactured in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. These GT40s are tailor-made, so one can specify what “Mark” of GT40 is desired; engine options are also up to the individual customer, though classic Ford V8-based options are usually preferred. Prices currently run in the $250-300k range, depending on specs.
The interior is as whacky and as close to the original car as you’d expect. The humongous driver-side sill houses the right-hand lever to operate the 5-speed manual (the usual choice for these cars). The switchgear looks like it came off a late ‘50s Thames truck, that seat fabric looks totally BDSM and there is not supposed to be a tach among those dials – the big one is only for rpms. I didn’t check, but I assume they have that on this car as well. One mod con that can be added on the Superformance models is air-conditioning, which is apparently both very well hidden and direly needed.
Getting in to this car is apparently quite an art, one made much easier and graceful thanks to the removable steering wheel. That was standard on the original GT40s (except some Mark IVs), so it’s perfectly kosher. Not sure whether the mallet seen on the passenger seat is meant to help remove or attach the steering wheel or just for the knock-off rims – or both.
Superformance claim that at least 75% of the parts that are on this GT40 could be made to fit the ‘60s original – that’s one reason why they can ask for such a steep MRSP. This is like the real thing, only a lot more affordable, quite a bit more comfortable and a smidgen more usable. It’s still a street-legal race car, so practicality is not the name of the game here. But compared to the Lambos, Ferraris and McLarens that noisily prowl the pavement here, this is immeasurably cooler and rarer.
Now that GT40 production has resumed over the past couple of decades, the number of cars has gone up substantially, but remains pretty minute. According to Safir, two out of three GT40s now in existence are part of the continuation series that were made after 1995, when Superformance took over production. So there are a little over 200 “modern” GT40s to the hundred-odd ones Ford made over half a century ago.
I was present when this car’s owner returned, got in and drove off. This was preceded by the departure of Lamborghini in front, which did a U-turn and went down the avenue, wailing the usual F1-like V12 whine of present-day Italian blue-bloods. The GT40, in stark contrast, had the deepest, loudest bass line this side of a live rendition of Spinal Tap’s Big Bottom coming out of that child-bearing behind. I was apprehensive about it being capable of shattering glass – or triggering an earthquake. Race cars tend to leave me cold and modern supercars are just plain silly, but this brand new classic racer was really something else: beautiful in some angles, outlandish by any measure and altogether amazing to see (and hear!) in Tokyo’s tree-lined outdoor automobile museum.
Related posts:
Race Car Classic: Ford GT40 P/1075, by Aaron65
CC Outtake: Ford GT 40 Replica – Let’s Go Shopping, by PN
CC Cinema: The GT40 Gets The Hollywood Treatment In Ford V Ferrari, In Theaters This November, by Edward Snitkoff
I’d like to see the Lola Mk 6 get a mention. No Lola= no GT 40
The definitive GT40 these days is the Holman & Moody version. They basically are still building the GT40 Mark II like they did when Ford was winning races with them. They still have the original tooling and molds, and they are built with Holman & Moody serial numbers, just like they originals were to protect Ford from liability.
As Chris points out, the Ford GT40 Mark 1 was really a development of Eric Broadley’s Lola Mk6 GT. The cars already existed and had failed to win anything in their first campaign before Carroll Shelby and Holman & Moody were brought in to make them competitive.
An interesting tidbit is the ‘GT40’ being trademarked and allowed to be used on the Superperformance variant. The Holman & Moody version is simply the Ford ‘GT’, which is what the original was called. It’s not that far from the Ferrari 365 GTB/4 being known as the Daytona, which it was never officially named.
The story goes that when Ford decided to resurrect the car for 2005, they had approached the owner of Safir GT Spares (the company that owned the name) and offered a reasonable amount to use the GT40 name, along with three of the first cars off the line. The owner (forget his name) countered with $40 million, and Ford immediately dropped the idea, instead opting to simply call the car what it was originally: Ford GT.
The guy has since tried to beg-off by saying his high counter-offer was simply a starting point for negotiations, which may, in fact, be true. Unfortunately, it was such a ‘high’ counter-offer from what Ford was willing to pay, that Ford had zero interest in haggling.
I would go so far as to suggest that Ford really wasn’t all that interested in using ‘GT40’ in the first place, but made a nice offer, anyway, which, it would appear, the guy just pissed away out of pure greed.
And, to be honest, seeing the side stripe on the feature car with ‘GT40’, it seems more like an affectation at this point. I think I’d rather have one that simply said ‘Ford GT’ like the original.
Yes. Car would look much better without the “GT40.” In fact without the obligatory “Le Mans” stripes at all.
Curious tree tops in the distance. Drawn by Dr. Seuss?
Give me a pile of money and this IS the car I would buy. Engine would be the hardest decision. all aluminum 427 FE tunnel port with twin 4bbl holleys, Boss 429, 427 SOHC, 351 Clevor, Boss 302, even the numerous variations of the current 5.0 litre Coyote. Maybe visit A.J. Foyt and see if he has any spare 4 cam Indy engines laying around or the venerable 302 which could be done in many variations. Guess I’m going to need a BIG pile of money.
I vaguely recall an article where someone did exactly that, i.e., put a 4-cam Indy engine into an original GT40. IIRC, the displacement was something like 255CID, which is rather ironic, considering the lame,1980-82 production Ford 255 V8 engine.
I could be wrong but I thought the very early prototype cars were going to use the DOHC 255 ci engine but there was some concern that it wasn’t designed for endurance racing.
That sounds quite plausible, including Ford nixing the use of the DOHC 255 Indy engine in the GT40 due to longevity reasons. It doesn’t sound like it could have been tuned for the type of LeMans racing for which the GT40 was designed, at least not without very expensive re-engineering, which I’m sure Ford felt wasn’t necessary in lieu of their big-block engine series of the time.
It would seem they were right, as the GT40 acquitted itself quite well without the Indy 255.
I think I’d have to go original – a 289 or a 427. Sometimes I wish I had set out to make more money in life. 🙂
I wouldn’t need to think. It would be a 427 and always a 427. As in Cougar GT getting a little yawn and then the Cougar GT-E getting the wide eyes look because it housed the 427.
I had a the same reactions with my 68 Cougar XR7. Maroon, no vinyl top with a hood scoop. Looked like a stripper Cougar that some kid thru a hood scoop on. Then a little drag from one light to the next and they had been smoked by this Cougar. 428 Cobra Jet with a C6. I have to get a Marty report done on it to see how rare the car is. Damn thing didn’t even have a traction lock diff. Very late 68 build date. I wonder sometime what they were thinking when they ordered this car.
There was a Superperformance version featured in a recent past issue of Hot Rod magazine. The car was built by one of the guys that works for the company and builds the replicas for customers. I believe that Ford sold a street legal version of the racer back in the ’60’s. There are a couple of companies offering replicas of Cobras, I think that S/P is one. I went to a big replica/kit car show years ago, and was impressed by the quality of many of the replicas. It seems like there were more Cobras there, but there were many of the pre war Supercharged Merecedes models and even a Ferrari conversion built off of a Datsun Z car. Most replicas have moved well beyond the VW floor pan kit car.
Wow….great find. I need to make the trek to Jingu on a Sun – the Ginko trees should be turning soon so two reasons to go…
Let me know when you plan to go, we’ll meet up and gawk!
Trees are fruiting now – the leaves will turn in November, I should think…
The nearby area of Omotesando / Harajuku is also rife with CCs on a sunny Sunday.
Will do…