(First Posted October 24, 2013) Is time slowing down? Just fifteen years separate this 1960 Imperial and the Horizon’s birth. Or was it just that Detroit was terribly slow to embrace the inevitability of modern European design? Better late then never, because not only were the Horizon and Omni the first proper small cars ever built in Detroit, they also saved Chrysler from irrelevance and bankruptcy just in the nick of time.
Before we turn the clock back and rediscover the origins of Omnirizon twins, let’s briefly put that fifteen year span between the Imperial and Horizon in perspective:
Thirty five years separate the Horizon from this 2010 Golf. Has automotive evolution really slowed down that much? Unfair comparison, perhaps. Well, there is no 2010 Imperial to compare it to, since that species long ago became extinct. And the Golf does loom large in the Horizon’s existence. Or is it the other way around?
Our timeless main story begins with the Simca 1100 (at the left on the top, and right on the bottom, mislabeled as an R12). This photo is here courtesy of allpar.com, which has an excellent article about the birth of the Horizon by its creators here. We see it in a comparison of the C2 Horizon’s proposal with the brand new Golf . The C2 was the intended replacement for the Simca, and it’s easy to see that they (Simca, C2) sat on the same platform and followed its general shape.
When the Simca 1100/1204 first appeared in 1967, it set the template for the modern hatchback small car. It was the true winner of our CC virtual 1971 Small Car Comparison, and one of the first cars to employ that template was the 1975 VW Golf. Some of the Chrysler fan-boys at allpar argue that the Golf imitated the Simca. Conceptually yes; stylistically, the photo above is the damming evidence that once the Golf appeared, Chrysler’s fine tuning of their C2 proposal was deeply influenced by it, to put it politely.
The final of our comparison photos: the evidence is all too obvious, right down to the kink in the rear door. Well, if you’re going to imitate, the original Golf was certainly a good model, and it was a sight cheaper than hiring Guigiaro, like VW did.
The development of the Horizon has other compelling aspects beyond the cribbing. As the headline says, it was the first time one of the Big Three pulled its head out of its ass and decided that a modern FWD European design did actually make more sense for a small car than the crap it came up with by itself: the Chevy Vega, Ford Pinto and AMC Gremlin. In case you’ve forgotten, click the links, but in a nutshell, Detroit was obsessed with the idea that small cars needed to look like a shrunken Mustang or Camaro (not sure what the Gremlin was supposed to look like). Combined with RWD meant that they were atrociously cramped. Perhaps they were punishing their buyers for being so stupid to want a small car instead of a real car.
It didn’t have to be that way, and cars like the Simca 1100 and the Golf showed the way. Certainly, by today’s standards they are quite small indeed, perhaps like a Fiesta or less. But at the time, when even cars like the over sized Nova were none too roomy, this was a revelation. And the Horizon was bigger than the Golf, by far the roomiest of any small car at the time.
Chrysler, fortunately lacking the funds to join the Vega-Pinto debacle, looked to its European subsidiary for a life-line, having already been convinced of the Simca 1100′s capabilities, despite its poor sales in the US and reliability issues. In a very closely coordinated effort, Chrysler undertook a three-way development effort with its French and British units. That presented huge challenges, given the substantially different priorities and the metric-inch divide. But the body was fine tuned on both sides of the continent, and for the fist time ever, digital scans of the clays were exchanged via satellite. A first, and not bad for 1975.
It became clear early on that the US version would be a very different car except for the basic body. Well, at least that was shared. The Simca’s supple but more expensive long-stroke torsion bar suspension was jettisoned for more pragmatic MacPherson struts in the front. Americans either didn’t deserve or just wouldn’t appreciate that famous French ride. On the other hand, the Americans wisely stayed clear of the Simca engine, which was generally fragile and usually developed terrible valve clatter within 20k miles or so. In another nod to the Golf, Chrysler instead bought long blocks from VW, a 1,7 L version of the Golf’s 827 engine. Chrysler added its own manifold and cantankerous carb, foolishly eschewing fuel injection for several more years.
The Americans also developed the front automatic transaxle, a miniaturized TorqueFlite, which turned out to be pleasantly similar to its big brother reliability wise (whew!). And it brought its electronic prowess to both versions, with the first popular priced trip computer. Of course, the domestic version got an interior more in keeping with the um…slower to develop taste of Americans at the time. Still, it was a refreshing place to sit in the late seventies era of bordello interiors, with excellent visibility and decent ergonomics for the times.
Either way, the Horizons on both sides of the Atlantic were well received by the press, both winning respective COTY awards. That may have meant more in Europe, where it’s voted on by hundreds of auto journalists. Still, the American press and public reception was pretty universally positive, even though it was clear that the Horizon was not a Golf in certain key respects, mainly in the handling department. The Omnirizon’s suspension was Americanized in more ways than one. Its handling was decent for the times, but just neither actually fun nor inspiring.
Maybe that was a worthwhile trade off for the American versions’ much better rustproofing; the Euro Horizons were some of the worst rusters ever, and there may likely be less than 200 examples left on the whole continent. I’m sure I could find that many in Oregon. Our city water and electric utility had a fleet of them until just a couple of years ago.
Of course, those were undoubtedly from the latter years of the Omnirizon’s long US run from 1978 through 1990. And typical for American small cars, they slowly got better and better, later adopting the Chrysler 2.2 L four, fuel injection, and a 1.6 liter Peugeot engine as the base mill. Meanwhile though, cars like the Civic, Corolla and Mazda GLC/323 were evolving at a much quicker pace.
So even though the Omnirizons were pretty progressive when they arrived, time in the eighties was not standing still. The Japanese upsurge kept Omnirizon sales in check, although in its first three years it averaged over 200k units and some 1.8 million were sold during the whole run. Those first couple of years were critical, because Chrysler was in the depth of its brush with bankruptcy, largely in part because its big cars were obsolete or deadly sins.
But it wasn’t just the sales numbers alone. Without the Horizon and Omni, it’s highly doubtful Chrysler would have been able to develop their K-Cars in time and on budget, or at all. Chrysler had a huge head start with the Horizon and its fwd transaxle, and Lee Ioacocca could prove to his Washington DC bankers that he really did have that leading edge fwd technology, the equivalent of GM and its Volt more recently.
Of course, the legendary hi-po versions of the Omni developed with Carroll Shelby can’t be ignored here, although the odds of finding one on the street are slim indeed. But starting with the 1984 GLH (“Goes Like Hell”), the VW GTI had a wild and woolly competitor. The first version was actually the most GTI-like, with the 110 hp tweaked 2.2. The optional 146 turbo version was already something different altogether. But then the GLHS appeared with an uprated 175 hp turbo. A crude and rude little beast it was; the wildest combination of torque steer and turbo lag bang for the buck.
The Omnirizon twins did nothing to stave of the Japanese invasion of the coasts or dissuade VW lovers from their Rabbits, but they did finally expose heartland Americans to what a proper small car could be, including a fitting hot-rod version of it. For that, it deserves a special place in my history book. And if Chrysler had kept developing it properly, my last combination picture could be comparing an original Horizon with a 2013 Horizon. Oops; make that a 2013 Omni.
No such luck; Chrysler decided small cars (Caliber) should look like a trucky SUV. Well, the Caliber’s replacement, the Dart, is of course based on a European Fiat. So maybe automotive time hasn’t slowed down; it’s just running in circles.
…less than 200 examples left on the whole continent.
I couldn’t resist looking up mobile.de to see if there’s any Talbot Horizon left. Yep, a finest and most immaculate 1982 specimen with automatic gearbox (!) listed for €2,490.
What’s interesting is the sales centre listing this Talbot specialises in high-end and exotic vehicles.
https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/details.html?id=218977161&damageUnrepaired=NO_DAMAGE_UNREPAIRED&isSearchRequest=true&makeModelVariant1.makeId=23800&makeModelVariant1.modelId=2&pageNumber=1&scopeId=C&sfmr=false&fnai=prev&searchId=47197fc7-7cf3-9105-68f9-a43dc6fe9305
Regarding the Imperial being paired with the Horizon in the opening picture – imagine what the Horizon would have looked like if Exner had designed it!
A better comparison would have been seeing a New Yorker Brougham next to a Omnirizon in a 1978 Chrysler showroom, like seeing a batwing Impala next to a Corvair in a 1960 Chevy showroom.
Particularly since they dropped the C-body post sedans along with the station wagons and Dodge/Plymouths for 1978. All ’78 New Yorkers and Newports were hardtops (at least structurally, there was the “St. Regis Formal Roof” option for coupes with fixed opera windows) and the four-door hardtop was the last of its’ kind from or even available in America.
I had a ’83 Plymouth Horizon from about ’85 to ’90. I really liked that car as it took me just about everywhere cheaply and in relative comfort. A 5 speed manual meant that I got really good mileage for the time from a 2.2 liter engine with decent, for the time, acceleration. Silver with a grey interior it held up pretty well. Eventually I could hear a new noise when I shifted into 5th gear and I got worried. About 146,000 miles I decided that was enough and sold it to my cousin and bought a 1990 Honda Civic wagon.
Two traveling memories I have are driving through North Carolina I found I could place my left foot on the leftmost dash airvent and stretch my back. Probably not the safest but it sure allowed me to continue driving. The second memory is driving to work one day when the clutch pedal lost all tension. I coasted to the light which turned green and then right into the gas station / garage parking lot. I told them I lost the clutch and he could not believe the car didn’t have to be towed it was already there!
I just want to add that I had no idea how similar these were to the VW Golf. I drive a Golf currently and now understand where my instant appreciation for it comes from.
I realized after reading this yesterday that I hadn’t seen an Omnirizon in quite a while but the CC effect struck today and I noticed one just now parked on Hollywood Boulevard. Even more remarkable is that it had Virginia plates and looked packed to the gills, meaning it’s owner drove it cross-country to California.
My mom’s 1st car was a 1983 Horizon (an ’84 is below but it’s the same color). I was around 4 or 5 yrs old when it got replaced by a ’97 Mercury Tracer. I know we had it at least up to Halloween of 1998 b/c we have pictures of it from around that time. That’s been 21 years! No telling what’s become of it now (we got rid of it when the transmission cable broke).
Identical twin to my mom’s ’86.