1953.
My dad was 19, recently graduated from high school…and desperately trying to avoid being drafted into the Chinese Nationalist Army under the ultimate oversight of the dictator Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek. Dad failed in this regard. He was drafted, only not into the Army. Rather, he was conscripted into the Air Force where he was assigned to pilot a tank. Presumably in Taiwan in 1953 tanks were much easier to come by than airplanes. Anyhow, the assignment didn’t last for long. That gig was up after his poor tank-piloting skills led to an unfortunate incident involving the destruction of a farmer’s field and maybe killing – or at least substantially scaring – a water buffalo or two. In short order my Dad was ejected from the service, sent to college, and the rest is history.
On the other side of the world, my mom was 11, living in Western Maryland in an area that is now a suburb of Washington, DC but back then was mostly woods and dairy farms; notably devoid of tanks, and particularly Chinese people.
I was 8.5 years from existence and given the circumstances was about as likely to occur as a snowstorm in August (in Maryland or Taipei). But things happen, you know?
And this 1953 Pontiac? It was there for all of that.
It’s still here, outlasting both of my parents, Chiang Kai-shek (and his wife, the Dragon Lady), and undoubtedly one very angry Taiwanese farmer whose rice paddy my dad obliterated because he wasn’t really so good at driving a tank and was more than happy to be quickly discharged from the service and sent on to his ultimate fate as a civil engineer/architect/urban planner/coastal zone manager in America. Of course this all worked out very well for me 8.5 years later.
Thank you Taiwanese farmer. I, car and public transit travelers to several major metropolitan airports, and a whole bunch of marine mammals are eternally grateful.
I don’t know the backstory on this Chieftain, but here it is sitting in the parking lot of a shoe store in Nashua, NH. Big as life and then some. All 3,400 pounds of it looking as good as it did when General Eisenhower was days away from being inaugurated President. But you know what? Ike’s televised inauguration was just one day after a certain television event of the Century (as of 1953, at least) that involved Lucille Ball. And when it came to comparing “ratings”, many more people in fact tuned into I Love Lucy that third week of January, 1953 than Ike’s ceremony..because you know, Lucy? Ike?
For those, like me, who missed it, it is said that Eisenhower’s 1953 swearing in ceremony wasn’t exactly a barn-burner. Still, it did mark the only (thus far) occasion where a new President was lassoed in front of the American people by a rodeo star and TV/movie cowboy. Montie Montana was his name. Unfortunately, much of the American television-viewing public missed that spectacle. Cowboy fans would have to wait another 28 years until a different movie cowboy was actually elected President (certainly based to some extent on fame stemming from his iconic 1953 movie appearance).
Lucy Goes to the Hospital, January 19, 1953, was viewed by over 70% of American households with a television set.
I totally understand the greater interest in I Love Lucy than the TV broadcast of Ike’s inaugural. That’s because I’m a man interested in extremes. I either like things that obviously are created to last forever and stand the test of time, or if not that then things that last a maximum of 30 minutes. A presidency, particularly of the kind we Americans had 72 years ago, would have seemed to me to be kind of iffy in the realm of consequential things. Yeah, he’s tall and bald and looks like someone who deserves a desk job for the next four years; but that Lucy! She’s one craaaaaazy redhead. (Not really) Plus, she’s a rhumba girl. (Perhaps, yes.) Always something exciting to see there!
The phenomenon of popular culture stealing the limelight from dull stuff like national politics is absolutely nothing new. The little things in life have a way of doing that.
To address the other end of my spectrum of interest in extremes, we have the 1953 Chieftain. I’m going to limit my commentary to basically what the car looks like since I really don’t know that much about these cars other than what they look like. I know that there are many readers who can speak to the actual automotive merits of the car. That will happen in the comments.
Since I’m making a case for trivial things being the most interesting, I will say that two of the things I like most about this Pontiac are the hood ornament and the antenna topper. From what I can gather, the car probably came from the factory with that hood ornament, but probably not the antenna topper. Whatever. They are totally cool (even better if the hood ornament lights up, which it might). I think that if you’re going to go the hood ornament route, then something made out of amber lucite that probably lights up at night is the way to go.
I’ve now seen these antenna toppers various places online, and they often come in the same shade of orange as the Chieftain’s Chief Pontiac head hood ornament. I like to think that the owner of this car probably thought long and hard before choosing the blue antenna topper. That’s good. It makes the car more noticeable, and wouldn’t you think that’s the point?
For a detailed discussion of the history of whitewall tires, you should redirect to Tom Halter’s excellent multipart coverage of the subject. All I’m going to say here is that the Chieftain’s whitewalls are clearly of the “go big or go home” school of whitewall tire thought. The red trim on the hubcaps is a perfect crowning touch.
The concept of accenting with bits of color extends to the trunk lid with the Pontiac badge in red, cresting over the grab area for the trunk. It’s also here where the car shows off its symmetry very well. The single tailpipe is about the only thing on this car that is not symmetrical. It’s almost an “exception that proves the rule” kind of thing.
I love symmetry.
There are Chief Pontiac busts on each rear fender, highlighting the 1953’s proto-fins. That’s what I call them. I’ve always appreciated the versions of these appendages that appear on early to mid 1950s Cadillacs. For some reason I’ve never noticed them before on Pontiacs, and I like these even more without the embedded tail lights that the Cadillacs have.
It was difficult to line up a good front shot of the full car given someone’s need to park in front of it, but you can still get the symmetry idea even in this slightly angled view. Here we have the accent trim carried over from the rear of the car plus another Chief Pontiac head logo; and a big red “Pontiac” badge that looks a little bit like a mustache, referencing Joseph Dennis’s recent post about car ‘staches. I’m now seeing these everywhere. This one, if you just focus on the red badge, reminds me a bit of a John Waters (7 years old in 1953) pencil-thin mustache. But if you look down at the big piece of chrome below, the Chieftain’s face takes on something of a Wilford Brimley effect (19 in 1953, just like my dad.). Pink Flamingos or Oatmeal, It’s the Right Thing to Do. Your choice. The Pontiac with its rich array of visual cues gives you access to both.
I wonder what Mr. Waters was watching in 1953 as opposed to Mr. Brimley. I can totally see a first-grader John Waters in Baltimore cracking up over the obstetrical antics of Lucy, Ricky, Fred and Ethyl…whereas Ike’s special day would be more to the liking of a guy who would later be famous for acting in Westerns and eating oatmeal. It’s a set of images that fits well with what has turned out to be our pop culture-informed expectations.
Well, maybe our expectations have led us astray. I can also see Wilford (given his chosen profession in the dramatic arts) being a lot more interested in critically watching Lucy and Ricky and soon to be Desi Jr./Little Ricky versus the guy who he narrowly missed serving under in a war. Wilford was a Marine who served in Alaska in 1953. A couple of years of doing that and a guy could easily develop a life-long love of a steaming bowl of oatmeal. Really, who knows? Wilford has been gone for 4 years, so there’s no asking him.
But it’s not knowing that’s in fact the point.
We never know in the moment what is going to make a lasting difference. 71 years later, I dare say that there are a lot more living human beings who could identify Lucille Ball in a lineup than Dwight D. Eisenhower (not that that’s a good thing). Likewise, “Little Ricky” is still with us. As is this 1953 Pontiac. Would anyone have guessed this particular car – with its ornamental doodads so right for its time – could have lingered on, obviously cared for, so that I could encounter it in some random parking lot?
Along the way from then until now, so many things have happened that we never could have predicted. Just like that Taiwanese farmer and some sorry skinny 19 year old dude (decidedly NOT Wilford Brimley) whose bad tank driving skills brought us to exactly what you’re looking at this very second.
You just never know how things will turn out.
A few other notable 1953 events:
- Jacques Tati debuts Monsieur Hulot in Les Vacances de Monsieur Hulot, paving the way for some of the greatest (French) car films of all time.
- Watson and Crick and that DNA thing.
- Joseph Salk creates the first Polio vaccine (it took a couple of tries to get this right).
- Aldous Huxley takes mescaline and writes the Doors of Perception the following year.
- Humans summit Mt. Everest for the first time.
- Elizabeth is crowned Queen of England, thereby inspiring the creation of Matchbox cars.
It was a busy year, we now know.
Different colors against all the chrome gave cars lots of art. The body color and all the reds work great with the chrome. Nice pictures. Nice writing too.
Thank you bnrmusa. This is such a well cared for car, and yet given its kind of day to day errand (there was no car show involved here, just the parking lot of a store) I have to believe that it’s pampered but still doing some manner of daily driving duty.
My goodness, that Pontiac is a sweetheart isn’t it? Great paint and chrome, and according to Dr Google the hood ornament does indeed light up. Lovely car for a leisurely cruise to the store.
Your father’s tank story made me chuckle. A disaster can lead to good things.
Wow Jeff, you really took us on a romp through your family history, I Love Lucy and 1953 in general! And all from this ordinary little Pontiac – which, after all these decades, isn’t so ordinary any more.
I will join you in love for the detailing on this Pontiac – and especially the amber indian head hood ornament. I think Pontiac’s trim treatment on the sides makes this chubby, blocky body look a little longer and lower than it really is. And one other I Love Lucy tie-in with Pontiac, is that when Lucy and Ricky left for Hollywood in 1955, the show put them in a Pontiac convertible.
My other takeaway from this is – who knew that the Taiwan Air Force was largely made up of tanks? Of course, the American Navy had a lot of airplanes, so maybe there was some kind of military synergy there. I guess it’s a good thing your father was not there long enough to find out. My own father’s military career was also a short one – he joined the army under an assumed identity at age 16, and was discharged from his duties as an MP in Korea after his parents finally found out where he was and notified the Defense Department. As I think about it, this might well have taken place in 1953.
These stories from you and Jeff about your fathers’ (brief) military careers are priceless historical nuggets. Different times, for sure.
Thanks Jim 🙂 I love the idea that an ordinary car can become extraordinary just for sticking around.
Good point about I Love Lucy and the later featuring of Pontiac. Those episodes where they are driving out to California are some of my favorites. General Motors was indeed a sponsor of the show, and given the many “firsts” associated with I Love Lucy and Desilu Productions, I’d guess that they were one of the first TV shows with a vehicle product placement.
That famous shot of the Ricardos and the Mertzs driving across the GW Bridge (on the way to California in that Pontiac) was also a TV first. First use of a rear screen process shot for television. Fun fact is that the bridge authorities only allowed the film crew one drive across the bridge, so they only got one shot. It turned out to be one shot out the back window of a vehicle as the Pontiac itself as being driven across the bridge, and that’s the shot they used. So, that car you see in the photo between Lucy and Ethel (over their shoulders) is the same Pontiac that appears other places in the episode (and subsequent episodes).
Your dad’s story is excellent. Hauled back from Korea for a falsehood.
Nash provided cars for the earlier years of the Superman TV show. The big Nash Statesman sedans appeared as police cars, Lois drove a Rambler, and Clark drove a Nash-Healey. In the fifth season Jimmy drove a fabulous 56 Dodge Royal Lancer convertible but by then the Nash brand was nearly gone.
Lincoln sponsored Ed Sullivan for a number of years. One could probably come up with other shows contemporary to I Love Lucy that used automotive product placement.
The worst sponsor of i Love Lucy was Philip Morris, with a product that eventually would shorten the lives of Desi Arnaz and Lucille Ball.
Good points. I forgot about the George Reeves Superman series…although I shouldn’t have since those were right there in the after school tv rotation in the 1960s/1970s.
Totally agree about the Phillip Morris connection.
https://youtu.be/gP_bLYwXBpI?t=22
Though Wikipedia claims GM was a sponsor of “I Love Lucy” I can find nothing to support that. The sponsor of the first three seasons was Philip Morris cigarettes. In Season 4 (1954-55), around the time the “Hollywood” eps started, Philip Morris cut its sponsorship in half, the other half picked up by Procter & Gamble. In June 1955, Morris ended its half-sponsorship and was replaced by General Foods, sharing sponsorship with P&G. Those two sponsors continued until the end of the series. Ford later sponsored the first season (1957-58) of the hourlong Lucy-Desi shows that replaced “I Love Lucy” and there are Ford TV ads featuring the cast. There are no similar GM ads. Presumably GM paid for the product placement of the Pontiac but that did not make them a sponsor.
As for the first rear projection process shot in TV, I doubt that as “Adventures of Superman” was using rear projection for the flying sequences years before the “Hollywood” eps of “ILL” were filmed.
The hood ornament lights up when the headlights are turned on.
Harley Earl liked the red accents along with the chrome and had used them on the ‘41 Chevy. Maybe other cars as well, the Chevy is just the one I’ve noticed.
So nice to see a car like this without a lot of horrible mods.
In many ways, the 1950s are a historical blind spot to me. Long enough before my birth to seem recent, but contemporary enough that history classes didn’t deal much with it.
1950s-era cars likewise fall into a sort of blind spot for me. However, I distinctly recall going to car shows with my dad in the 1980s, and dad would inevitably gravitate towards the Pontiacs and show me the hood ornament. So far from being trivial, I’d say that the hood ornament captures this car’s essence for a whole lot of people.
Amusingly, my only exposure to I Love Lucy came when I was a teenager and the pizza restaurant where my family ate every Wednesday evening played I Love Lucy reruns constantly. To this date, the sight of that show brings back memories of Vince’s pizza.
Great car here, and thanks for capturing so many varied aspects of its birth year.
Most people forget (or never knew) that Desi Arnaz may have been the bigger star of the couple before that television show, having led a band since the late 1930’s. He originally released Cuban Pete on the RCA Victor label in 1946 when his band was the regular band for Bob Hope’s radio show.
Love this original version. I have it on 78. (as well as several less antique media 😉 )
It wasn’t until I was in college that discovered Desi’s music and career pre-I Love Lucy. I’d always loved the episodes of the show where they’d focus on Desi/Ricki’s nightclub acts. And then when I discovered that most of the numbers he performed were things that he’d already had hits with 10 years before, it kind of blew my mind.
Eric, I know what you mean about the 1950s being an historical blind spot for you. I feel that way a lot of the time myself. It was kind of what I was getting at when I wrote that I really don’t know too much about cars of this generation. 10 years later (i.e., early to mid-1960s) and I was deep into my own car obsession, but that was mostly around newer vehicles that I was more likely to see driving around and that families that I knew had and drove. I can to this day pretty much guess the exact year of any American-made car if was made after I was born up until about 2000…afterwhich everything looks the same. For 1950s cars, I can only typically get within a couple of years, and then turn to Google for help.
My dad was fond of Plymouths from the 1950s and would point them out to me, so I may be a bit better on the MoPar front.
As for I Love Lucy, it was in non-stop afternoon reruns from some of my earliest memories well through high school in the late 1970s, so I caught a lot of it (most episodes multiple times). Plus, my mom grew up with it broadcast originally, and she loved it, so it was definitely approved programming for me. And well, when you’re 10 and your mom allows you to watch something, you’re all in. At least I was. And it certainly wasn’t Dark Shadows (another afternoon broadcast that definitely was NOT approved programming according to my mom).
The 1953 Chieftain was 202.7 inches (5,149 mm) long on a 122-inch (3,099-mm) wheelbase, 63¼ inches (1,607 mm) high, and 76.1 inches (1,933 mm) wide. This is pre-“Wide Track,” so tread width is 58.5 inches (1,486 mm) front and 59.1 inches (1,500 mm) rear. Depending on which engine it has and how it’s equipped, curb weight is probably between 3,750 and 3,900 lb (1,705 to 1,775 kg); the 3,400-lb figure is a shipping weight, without fuel or fluids.
Engine might be either a 239 cubic inch (3,920 cc) six or a 264 cubic inch (4,398 cc) straight eight, both prewar side-valve designs. The eight was much more common — by about 5 to 1 — although it was only a little bit more powerful than the six (3 or 4 hp). Most of these cars had automatic, which at this point was the four-speed Dual Range Hydra-Matic. With the eight and Hydra-Matic, it had a top speed of about 95 mph and could reach 60 mph from a standing start in about 19 seconds. Since Hydra-Matic included a 3.08:1 axle ratio, you could conceivably get up to 20 mpg (11.7 L/100 km) on the highway, although something like 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) was probably more likely.
Assuming that most of the chrome is original, this is probably a Chieftain Eight Deluxe, which had a base price of $2,194. That did not include Hydra-Matic, which was an extra $178, and adding various options and accessories (like a heater, windshield washers, turn signals, or backup lights, none of which were standard) would probably give a list price of at least $2,600; you could top $3,000 if you ladled on all the chrome gewgaws, many of which were dealer add-ons.
Here’s the data table from the road test in the May 1953 Motor Trend of a Chieftain Eight Deluxe four-door sedan, probably very much like the photo car. Prices include federal excise tax.
I’m fascinated by the “Annual Cost of Gasoline” number. Unless I’m missing something (like footnotes, or maybe something elsewhere in the article?), that’s entirely meaningless information unless one knows how many miles are driven in a year and the cost per gallon.
This is like my saying “I spent $50.47 today on lobsters.” (I did…Happy 4th!) OK…was that for 2 lobsters, in which case they were either honking large or crazy expensive. Or maybe it was lobster for 8, in which case they were either dead or I got a wicked good deal.
In fact, the truth is somewhere in between (which I realize is entirely meaningless as well).
But really, I suppose the real point is that few readers in 1953 really cared how much they would spend on gas.
It’s a standardized figure based on the recorded fuel economy, an average annual mileage, and average national cost of gasoline (which are not specified in the text, but are explained in an earlier article I would have to look up — I don’t remember them off the top of my head). Modern consumer publications still sometimes do this, or used to up until relatively recently, to estimate cost of ownership. Obviously, not everyone will drive the same mileage (or pay the same price for gasoline), but the point is to create a uniform estimate that can be compared between cars. Same principle as the EPA mileage sticker.
The February 1953 Motor Trend explains:
If you use 28 cents per gallon (average for 1953) that comes out to 19 mpg, which seems unrealistically high. It’s odd that they do not actually show an average fuel economy number; those steady state numbers are not indicative of typical driving modes. I’d have a hard time believing this Pontiac 8 got better than about 16 mpg in average driving modes.
I suppose the real point is that few readers in 1953 really cared how much they would spend on gas.
That’s a common assumption about the ’50s, but not true. The average 28 cent/gal gas adjusts to $3.25 today, and these cars might have averaged 15-16 mpg (the steady state numbers are largely unrepresentative of normal driving patterns). Given that the median wage (for men) ($3200) adjusts to $37,000, gas (and other car expenses) were a significantly higher proportion of their income. Cars wore out much faster then, and required vastly more maintenance.
The only mitigating factor is that most people drove much less back then, in part because the cost per mile was so much higher.
There was a very good economic reason why import (and compact) sales exploded in the ’50s.
Here from the same road test is their “Box Score,” comparing it to other cars tested in the same period. Lots of very mid-pack results except in ride.
“Roadability” is a term that went out of the language of test reports at some point. I assume it’s the same as “handling” but not sure if roadability included some additional nuance.
Love the J.W. / Pink Flamingos reference.
Unlike most fans, I do know cars.
The last year of the Pontiac Straight Eight.
Cast with nickel in the iron, not the easy flowing crap developed later for “thin wall casting”, with no pesky overhead valve issues, with a crankshaft whose huge main journals so overlapped the radius of the rod journals it resembles a camshaft at first glance, it will literally run forever and a day.
Given the 4 speed Hydramatic, possibly filled with some whale oil, this car marked the absolute pinnacle of a quality automobile.
The straight eight hung around for one more year: 1954 was its last year.
And the ’54 Ponchos were essentially the same as the ’53s.
Thanks Sam. I don’t get a chance to make too many John Waters connections in CC posts, but when I do, I will.
“1953” was my oldest brothers , birth year. Not really relative to article but his first car purchase was a “Pontiac”.
Well, to take things full circle, when I started traveling to Taiwan for work in the late ‘90’s, my engineering counterpart at our partner company there drove a Pontiac, a J2000. There were quite a few J cars, Ford Tempo’s, and various FWD Chrysler products on the streets of Taipei then. Pretty much all gone within a few years.
Obviously they don’t get any Chinese cars in Taiwan nowadays, so I expect that it’s all Japanese (and perhaps Korean). Ironic though if it’s Japanese since the island had 50 years of not-so-happy Japanese occupation before the exiled mainland Chinese folks came and took over.
A very enjoyable breakfast read. The randomness and serendipity of life is infinitely fascinating and amazing.
A Pontiac of this vintage played a minor milestone in my young life, as it was the first straight eight engine I ever consciously looked at. In about 1962 or so, there were two Austrian young women who had some sort of one year nursing or such program at the U of Iowa, and they were interested in buying a somewhat tired old Pontiac of this vintage. They brought it by our house and my father raised the hood and made a point of the straight eight engine, which somehow impressed him given that straight eights were a really big deal back in Austria in his day. I remember it well, that long rectangular cast iron lump with its 8 spark plugs. It sounded a bit wheezy and tired, idling there. Of course my father couldn’t make any sort of diagnosis, as that was utterly outside his skill set. So they bought it and IIRC it got them through the year puttering around Iowa City and maybe a few excursions to the Mississippi or such.
Thank you Paul.
I really wish I has been able to stick around and hear this car run, and to speak to its owner. But by the time I finished my shoe store business, it had moved on.
I have to wonder if perhaps Pops made a calculated error in that tank to get out of a place he didn’t want to be .
Your storytelling is very good, thank you .
I love this car and it’s color .
Too bad you didn’t get any pictures of the massive and heavily chromed dashboard, the biggest thing in it was the radio speak, these had great sounding radios too .
Yes big, heavy and chunky looking but also extremely good cars .
I greatly miss my ’54 Hard Top Coupe fully optioned .
That translucent hood ornament was the second thing I fixed on the car after buying it .
These cars didn’t have “flashing acceleration” but were good enough and dead silent and cruised at 85 MPH on the open road .
-Nate
Thanks Nate!
You may have a point about my Dad’s calculated error.
He was really desperate to get to the US…had been since he was a young child in China. So I wouldn’t put it past him to do whatever he could to clear whatever barriers were in his way.
On another note, it is impressive how this Pontiac manages to make the A-Body shell it shares with Chevy look so much longer, even though the main center section is the same. That rear side vent adds to the illusion.
I am 1953 vintage and dads first brand new car was a Pontiac, but a 1955.
There is so much I love about and in this essay – thank you, Jeff! I’m a big “I Love Lucy” and Lucille Ball fan, extending even to her later shows. I had first heard of Wilford Brinley while watching an houromg show called “Our House” that ran in the mid-80s. And I’m never forget that scene in “I Love Lucy” where the Ricardos and the Mertzes tried to load up Ricky’s Pontiac with an incredible amount of luggage before going west to California.
That hood ornament is a work of art, and I really hope it lights up. I also really appreciated the family history you shared. Everything happens (or doesn’t happen) for a reason.
Maybe this afternoon, depending on what the weather does here in Chicago, I could find John Waters’s “Polyester” from 1981 and screen that here at home.
Brilliant essay.
Thanks Joe!
Whether it happened tonight, or at some future point, definitely find and watch Polyester. One of Waters’ best IMO. Although Female Trouble is perhaps better just for the devine madness and student-film aesthetic.
I remember watching Polyester in 1981 or 1982 in a mall movie theater in Western Massachusetts, under the influence of something that promised to take roughly 8 hours to wear off (if we were lucky and things worked out as promised), and being 150% fascinated by the “Odorama” scratch-n-sniff cards that came with the movie. Definitely worth watching even if the cards (developed by 3M!) are no longer available and one decides (wisely…also IMO) to watch it entirely sober.
I don’t know if the hood ornament lights up on this particular car, but my dad had a pale green ’53 Poncho, and the hood ornament did light up.
The license plate reminded me that American license plate sizes weren’t standardized until 1956, IIRC. Tennessee plates used to be shaped like Tennessee.
My family got their first TV in 1954. I assume my parents had their reasons for pulling the trigger when they did, but I suspect it wasn’t, “Rats, we missed President Eisenhower’s inauguration” or “Rats, we missed `Lucy Goes to the Hospital.'”
My parents had the TV before me. And the cat. Which pretty much firmly established in my mind what I felt were their priorities. 😉
I’m not sure therefore why they bought a TV, but I do recall buying our first color tv in 1968. It was a Philco (and that fact that was also a Ford product kind of blew me away). The first show we watched in color was Laugh In.
Just another note about the Arnezs. Both were quite popular and successful in their pre TV careers, Desi as a band leader, who fled Cuba as a young man after the communist takeover, where his family lost everything. Lucy as a movie actress. She was originally a showgirl/dancer. She moved to starring roles with actors like Red Skelton, in Du Barry was a Lady. (1943). After their marriage and the I love Lucy show, they founded the Desilu studio. They pioneered the use of videotape and of filming with a live audience. Desi devised a new kind of camera and editing machine They also retained the legal ownership of the studio’s programming, which was a first, and produced a lot of income under syndication. I read both of their autobiographies and it was interesting to learn how successful and innovative the couple was.
Thanks Jose!
The biographies of Lucille and Desi are truly fascinating. I have to admit that my appreciation for Lucy and Desi grew tremendously as I grew older and started to read about the real Lucy and “Ricki”. I also (to JPC’s comment) really came to appreciate Desi as a band leader.
Several years ago, I listened to a 10 episode podcast about the Arnezs. It’s called “The Plot Thickens”, and all of season 3 is about them. Here’s a link to the series – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-plot-thickens/id1504732282 – and it’s season 3 that you’re looking for. It’s really good.
Like you, Jose, and JPC I have great admiration for Desi Arnaz – and Lucy said at the end of his life that despite the character flaws he remained her greatest love. His incredible talents as a performer, producer, director, et al are endless. The Arnaz eye for talent is widely noted. IIRC he handpicked Vivian Vance and William Frawley for the show. And the perfectionism! For the episode Pioneer Women he was not satisfied with the phony look of the set designer’s artificial loaf of bread coming out of the Ricardo’s oven and insisted that a bakery produce for use a real (and long) loaf of bread.
One of my colleagues at UCLA was a screenwriter and friends with Madelyn Pugh who, along with Bob Carroll, Jr., wrote for I Love Lucy and she used to share their many good stories about Desi Arnaz.
Wasn’t the Communist takeover of Cuba in 1959?
There was also a revolution in 1933:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Revolution_of_1933
Nice story Jeff, a very enjoyable read!
I was born a year earlier than the featured Pontiac, when Truman was still president. I have some basic memories of Ike from later in the 50s, but it wasn’t until the 1960 race between JFK and Nixon that I really became aware of national politics. “I Love Lucy” went into syndication quite early, so I’m not sure if I ever saw the originals on TV as opposed to the reruns.
The Pontiac is glorious, and I’m a sucker for blue, especially in that lovely wedgwood hue. I can still remember riding in cars with rear vent windows.
For the record Desi’s surname was ‘Arnaz’. No ‘e’.
Thanks for the correction Curt!
There is nothing not to like about this car: the color, the year, the suspenders, the light-up hood ornament. OK, so it has the typical early ’50s GM indifference to hood/fender/cowl fit, something I’m way too familiar with thanks to my ’53 Special…still, it’s hard to go wrong cruising around in a car like this.
You kill a human in military service and get promoted. Ypu kill or injure a farm animal and get ejected from military service
My parents first new car was a 1953 Pontiac Chieftain Deluxe, very similar to the featured car, even the color, although theirs had a dark blue roof. The Chieftain Deluxe was far more popular than the Chieftain Special, with more chrome trim, a deluxe steering wheel and nicer interior appointments. Most also had the straight eight, signified by the “8” on the trunk lid, and Hydra-matic. The engine had that unique straight eight sound, similar to a Buick of that era, but with the quite distinctive shifts of the 4 speed Hydra-matic. Don’t know about the gas mileage, but gas was so cheap at the time no one really cared. And yes, the Indian hood ornament did light up.
Things I recall was that were typical of early fifties cars were 1,000 mile oil changes and chassis lubrications, new tires every year, twice yearly “tune-ups”, regularly replacing the rusted out muffler and flushing the radiator yearly. A real PITA. After a few years the front seat would also need “seat covers” as well. Places like Rayco were everywhere to take care of these needs. Most owners tired of all this after a few years, hastening the cars demise. By 1960 the Pontiac was just about finished at 90,000 miles, with everyone thinking this was excellent service from a car. Compare that today’s new cars, where aside from 10,000 mile oil changes, nothing needs to be done for the first 100,000 miles and tires can last 70,000 miles.
The Pontiac was replaced by a used, 1957 Plymouth Belvedere, a car so bad that dad would never consider a Chrysler product again for the rest of his life. The Plymouth was traded-in on a new, 1963 Oldsmobile Dynamic 88, which gave fine service.