Recently I posed a Question Of The Day about what car(s) everyone would like to see in the wild during 2019. The top of my list was a fuselage Dodge Coronet from the 1971 to 1974 model years. As always a commenter delivered, Chas in this case, providing a picture of not just any ordinary fuselage Coronet, but this baby blue one-year wonder Coronet of 1974.
But this story quickly evolves.
Two nights after that QOTD ran, in my Coronet longing-induced stupor, I did a quickie craigslist search for “Dodge Coronet”. So what to my incredulous eyes should appear, but a ’74 Coronet with freakin’ big wheels!!!
Craig’s map showed it as being near East St. Louis. Close, but not too close.
Frankly, I had been so focused on finding any Coronet from that era, an example of car I haven’t seen since around the time Burt Reynolds divorced Loni Anderson, the thought of finding that ever so elusive 1974 model was simply wishful thinking atop weird hankerings. But here it is in all its Frosty Green Metallic glory – if this is indeed the original color, but Frosty Green was (shockingly) the only green available for the Coronet that year.
Here’s proof!
So what exactly is it about the 1974 Dodge Coronet that makes it so unique, so scintillating, allowing it to be catapulted into the stratosphere apart from all those other, ordinary boiler plate Coronets?
The beak. Changed from the loop bumpers of 1971 to 1973, the Coronet would sport a different schnoz again for the next two years. This is a one-year wonder. And it’s wonderful.
I’m uploading pictures as I write this love-filled online soliloquy and I have to admit to sitting here and staring at this front in a raptured amazement for about three hours now. It’s so familiar yet so exotic all at the same time. It looks like something Chrysler would have developed for the Australian market. It’s awesome! The only way this could be better is if this guy had two of them for sale!
Not that I’m interesting in buying. This whole fuselage Coronet fixation is strictly voyeuristic. Hmm; that sentence sounds rather creepy. Let’s just say I’m simply window shopping.
But if shopping, one needs to know what they are shopping for. So what exactly is a coronet?
The potential knee-jerk reaction would be to think of a musical instrument. Wrong; you are thinking cornet. We need a coronet. O, what a difference.
A coronet is defined by Merriam-Webster as:
1: a small or lesser crown usually signifying a rank below that of a sovereign
2: a wreath or band for the head usually for wear by women on formal occasions
3: the lower part of a horse’s pastern where the horn terminates in skin
Here’s a better visual thanks to the Encyclopedia Brittanica. There’s nothing quite like the instant gratification gained from a Duck-Duck-Go image search.
As for Dodge, they co-opted the name “Coronet” way back in 1949, the year the first VW Beetle was sold in the United States and the average price of a home was $7,450. At that time the Coronet was the top-of-the-line Dodge and Dodge made no bones about it either. Just compare the 1953 Coronet convertible in the lower left to the exciting as tap water 1953 Meadowbrook in the upper right. Which one has the tanned, smiling, shirtless alpha-male surrounded by bikini-clad babes, two of which appear to be going home with him? Which has the matronly looking woman ignoring the suited male driver? She’s probably spying on convertible guy and experiencing twinges of desire.
In the finest of Detroit customs, Dodge built a brand around the name Coronet. It held firm in its mission, occupying the top of the Dodge line for many years. It was so firmly established and branded, when anybody in North America said “Coronet” everybody knew exactly what was being talked about. It was the example Toyota and Honda mimicked decades later with the Corolla and Civic, respectively.
Yeah, right.
Rather, in true Detroit fashion, the Coronet was demoted to being mid-level, in favor of the Royal, for 1954. The Coronet was demoted a second time, to entry level, for 1955 as Royal and the new Custom Royal were above it. Is this the quickest a model name was ever dumped down the outhouse pit? If not it’s likely a contender.
Of all the talents demonstrated by Detroit’s automotive executives, they were stunningly brilliant at name debasement.
To atone for their sin of squandering name recognition, Dodge gave the Coronet name a sabbatical from 1960 through 1964. The name reappeared as the midsize Dodge B-body in 1965, a place it kept until being kicked to the curb again at the end of 1976. The “Coronet” name is still moldering in the gutter.
Wheelbases for the reincarnated Coronet were 117″, a length it would maintain until 1971.
These midsize Coronets were darn good looking cars, too. My second craigslist search for Coronets rewarded me with this amazing 42,000 mile 1968 Coronet which is also in the St. Louis area. It looked so good, in such a vibrant and a likely definitive color, I momentarily lost focus and had to ask myself what I had been looking for.
No, it wasn’t any sort of preview into a senior moment. Nor did the crack-pipe $21,000 asking price distract me. My distraction was a combination of this blue beauty combined with the surprise under that opened hood.
Drum roll, please….
When one sees 3/4 of what they anticipate, it surprises a person. Then I got to wondering how many slant six, two-door Coronets are still floating around. My wife expressed her affinity for this color, which is not something she typically does, which prompted me to daydream about having this Coronet parked downstairs in the garage instead of a certain old Ford. This would be a fine cruiser although that slant six would make for rather leisurely cruising.
The possibilities abounded….oh, wait. What was I writing about here? Oh yeah.
Dodge graciously provided the market with a new generation of Coronet for 1971. A loop bumpered beauty of epic good looks and seductive charm, its wheelbase grew an entire inch while weight was roughly the same.
There was also a lot of model cleanup as the 1970 Coronet had sub-models of Coronet Deluxe, Coronet 440, Coronet Super Bee, Coronet 500, and Coronet R/T. For 1971 it was base Coronet and Coronet Custom.
However, like many things in life, it wasn’t that simple. If you read the verbiage in the 1971 brochure (picture above the ’70 Coronet), it does a good job of summing the situation up by stating the Coronet was designed and built as a four-door, meaning there were no two-door Coronets for 1971.
Those were now the domain of the Charger line, meaning a taxi cab spec Charger that was as blah as unsweetened, room temperature Earl Grey tea was now on the roster. The fancier 500, Super Bee, and R/T models were still around but also wearing a Charger nameplate.
Any pretense of performance or sportiness was now gone from the Coronet. Or was it?
The 1972 Coronet brochure expresses the availability of a four-speed manual on a four-door Coronet equipped with the 400 cubic inch, 6.6 liter, V8 (a 4-4-400?). Given the Coronet and Charger were identical under the skin, offering this was no big whoopee.
Coronets remained physically unchanged for 1973 although brochures touted the abundance of sound deadening now being used, making it much more like the “Big Dodge”. While Chrysler had their issues, they weren’t completely tone deaf; Chrysler saw the writing on the wall about how isolation chambers would be all the rage in the far-out 1970s.
All of this leads us to 1974.
While I’ve been guilty of literary drooling about the front end, this wasn’t the only physical change to the Coronet for 1974.
The tail lights were also changed. Still inset in the bumper, as had been the case since 1971, the bumper itself was now meatier to meet federal regulations prompting the tail lights to be reshaped and more prominent.
These B-body Dodges would keep this basic rear-end treatment until the end in 1978. As one who typically finds bumper mounted tail lights to be off-putting, these are the sole exception. Dodge hit a home run with these; this tail light treatment is one of my favorite aspects of this entire car. If that sentiment puts me in the minority, so be it; I’m fine with that.
Chrysler did a relatively amazing job with bumper regulations during this time. These bumpers weren’t dainty little things but Chrysler did attempt to make them cohesive with the body. That wasn’t a universal thing, just ask Henry Ford II.
The seller has offered an abundance of really good pictures, so let’s explore his offering.
That chrome strip on the c-pillar make me think this Dodge was born with a vinyl toupee. Now gone, it’s easy to see what happens to a vinyl capped roof over the course of 45 years – or likely much less.
Right now the headliner is gone, so making any repairs to the roof should be somewhat more straightforward. It still won’t be easy but everything is already accessible.
Straightforward would also describe what appears to be Chrysler’s effervescent 318. Did they ever make a more robust, benign to abuse V8?
On the off-chance it’s wearing out, a person could quite creative with alternatives. A Magnum 5.2 or 5.9 from a 1994 to 2001 model pickup. A 5.7 Hemi from a late model Charger or Challenger. Or, just for giggles, a Pentastar 3.6.
We won’t talk about the ease of making it all work.
While the color does not facilitate anything other than depression, the condition of the interior doesn’t look horrible for its age. All it needs is a seat cover and better lumbar support. License plates bend rather easily.
Yes, I did entertain the idea of inquiring about this Dodge – for about 2.7 seconds. The timing just isn’t there as my papoose just got braces on her teeth.
Since I haven’t (yet) driven one, youtube is there to help fill in the blanks, be it auto crossing or…
Simply cutting a few doughnuts.
Has this sated my Coronet hunger? No, this is the glass of water you drink to fill your stomach; that’s a reprieve and the need for sustenance is still there. The Great Coronet Hunt continues. But these have certainly helped hold me over until I can eat.
Related Reading:
1975 Dodge Coronet – Missed Opportunities by JS
The line about the ‘74 looking like it was designed for the Australian market has some merit, check out the Chrysler Centura, very similar front end treatment for sure.
Apologies I can’t figure out how to “link” to a photo you’ll just have to look it up for yourself
There is indeed some family semblance.
Here’s a link to some pictures: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=chrysler+centura&t=osx&iax=images&ia=images
Hi .. Do you know if the powder blue Coronet might be for sale . I recently bought a barn find survivor in amazing shape .. I’m looking for a bunch of parts or a parts car , 315 679 2339 in in NY
Total Chrysler Centura vibes!
Another great piece, Jason. Thanks for bringing the uniqueness of the Coronet’s ’74 model year to the forefront.
Ive been waiting for this one! Thanks Jason. I always wondered what was with the one year only, stop gap front end. Why didn’t they just incorporate the ’75 single headlight in ’74 or keep the ’74 beak in production for a few more years to recoup some of the retooling costs? And then they did the same thing with the 1980 Volares and Aspens.
Those crazy Mopars.
In 1998, I actually owned a ’74 Coronet for about a month. It was a burgundy 318 car with a white vinyl top. It was sitting near my apartment and I wanted something cool to drive to work to keep the miles down on my then-new Ram pickup. It belonged to an elderly owner that couldn’t drive anymore and his son sold it to me for around $500. It lasted about a month before the timing chain snapped (it was right at around 100K miles and that’s right when the nylon timing chain teeth on 318s disintegrate,) and I didn’t feel like putting any time or work into it so I sold it to the maintenance guy at my apartment building for $100.
Anyway, for a little more Coronet porn, here is my buddy’s ’71 Coronet cruiser. Have a great day everyone!
Swoon!
This fixation is admittedly irrational, but that’s half the fun.
Like you, I’m perplexed about the one year old only front but similar was done to the Satellite with it’s one year only front and back. I’ve yet to find any definitive explanation about why this was done.
Since my last minute inclusion of the two videos in the text, youtube has been so kind as to suggest other, B-body related videos. What I have found has been incredible and, most surprisingly, many of these cars are in Europe.
Of note:
An identical ’74 Coronet with power windows.
A ’77 Fury with a slant six and three-on-the-tree.
A ’75 Fury with a three-on-the-tree.
And my favorite, another green ’74 Coronet that was gifted with a 440 six-pack.
Supposedly, the 1980 restyle of the Aspen/Volare was meant to last longer. But Lee I. cancelled the F bodies, for 1981, to show he “meant business” about promoting the K cars. But, they did get profits from M body until 1989.
The Coronet nameplate had lived a bit longer in Colombia as a rebadged M-body Diplomat.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/118029649@N03/35351979606
Great write up!!! all cars of 1974 have a special place in my heart as that is when i really got into cars. the 74’s also have a moody air about them now. as a teen i can remember going to the car dealers excited to see what the new model year would bring. i was always excited to see the new front ends and rear ends(lol) of the new models. that was a great time for me and now fondly remembered. those days are long gone now as nearly all cars look alike. thanks for the memories.
And there is THIS Dodge Coronet, though it (they) is (are) 1973. Perfect if you are kind of both ways about these cars.
Luckily I saved the photo. It’s from right here at CC, I think…but I can’t find it by a search. Maybe somebody can help?
ADDENDUM: Found it!
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-bi-directional-dual-440-powered-1973-dodge-coronet-police-pursuit/
…here is an interior photo.
I keep doing double takes over the blue one. The year, colors, wheel covers & side markers are identical to my old Dart, but the shape is just so different.
Great piece, Jason! I apologize for bursting your only-one-green bubble though. KG8 Deep Sherwood Metallic was also a deep, lustrous, verdant green.
I had a 1974 Coronet in that exact hue in the early 1990s when I was in high school. It had only 50k or so original miles at the time and had been sitting for awhile when I picked it up a local public auto auction for well south of $1,000. The tires were dry-rotted and so were all the seals in the engine — blue smoke rolled from the 318 when it started, but it ran strong and looked good.
Even though that Coronet was born the same year I was, it already seemed old and venerable to then 17-year-old me.
I agree on the color, and would peg this one as Avocado Gold, as shown on the 74 Duster below.
1974 was an interesting color palate as Chrysler seemed to straddle those early 70s goldish-avocado kinds of green with the more pure greens that took over by the mid 70s.
Here is the Frosty Green
You’ve forced me to put on my reading glasses, but I do concede you are correct about the Deep Sherwood Metallic – it’s right there on the brochure.
However, in my (weak) defense, that color printed off as much darker than in real life. I was looking for anything that looked green but when scouring for pictures did find Avocado Gold next to Frosty Green. While I don’t routinely shop for avocados, I’ve yet to see a gold one….
I don’t know why, but I really like the look of that 53 Meddowbrook! Something about the shape is really calling out to me. As far as I know, I’ve never seen one of these cars in the flesh or let alone in pictures. Now I have a strange Mopar itch to scratch! Or is it a scratch to itch?
Nice work Jason. I can’t really get thrilled about the green 74 with the wheels, especially at $3,500 (CL ad is still up). I guess the magical protective powers of metallic green did not protect that roof seam under the vinyl roof.
To me the 1974 Coronet front end looks like it should be smoking a cigar stub and asking “Whaddya know, kid?”
The 68 is a beauty all right, but again I’d say that’s a $15k car? But I know very little about how to value this properly.
“To me the 1974 Coronet front end looks like it should be smoking a cigar stub and asking “Whaddya know, kid?””
It reminds me of Sam the Eagle from The Muppets.
Perfect!
I feel somewhat foolish to admit it, but all this time I’d assumed the Dodge was named after the brass musical instrument. Well, now I know better.
Regarding the tail lights, I still find these bumper-mounted lights to be droopy-looking and sad. Granted, they’re better than most, but I’d vote for the 1968-72 Cutlass as having the best bumper-mounted tail light design.
Thanks for shedding some light on the ’74 Coronet — I’ve never paid much attention to them before.
Don’t worry if you never paid attention to them because, well, their weren’t that many to pay attention to! While I’m away at work right now and can’t verify it, I’m wanting to say sales drooped a bit for 1974, making this singular look even more unusual.
Count me as another who has been confused about that 1-year only treatment on the fronts of these cars. Although I must admit that I never really noticed this phenomenon until I wrote up this car’s sister, the 74 Satellite. (https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-american/curbside-classic-1974-plymouth-satellite-custom-almost-our-thanksgiving-turkey/)
I found these cars maddening. Chrysler kept changing bits and pieces, and starting around 1975 really started upgrading interiors, but that basic shape just never made a really attractive sedan. All of my personal experience with B bodies of the mid 70s was in the 2 door Coronet, er, Charger. It was a stripper coupe that was sort of a mashup of Dart and Charger. I might like one now but back then I couldn’t get past the flimsy-feeling bodies and preferred the pre-71 stuff.
How many of these were destroyed in The Blues Brothers movie and Dukes of Hazzard alone?
The Niedermeyers had two Coronets. I’ve talked about the ’65 wagon quite a bit, but it was replaced by a ’73 wagon; essentially the same in terms of trim levels (440 3-seater), and the 318 was now the LA instead of the Poly. Looked exactly like this one below. Puke green.
This all happened after I left home in ’71, but I drove it on one of my visits; took it out for a spin and it ran and handled better than the old one. A wee bit of progress.
Sounds like you have a pretty severe case of Coronet Fever. I was immunized at a young age.
Your family’s ’73 crossed my mind when writing this.
Given the direction of automotive handling during the 1970s, I’m somewhat surprised the ’73 handled better than the ’65. Progress is progress I suppose.
This gets me to thinking….the only Coronet wagon I can remember seeing belonged to Mrs. Minnoe Wilson who lived in the town where I grew up. On my recent piece about that place I almost included her but couldn’t make a good tie in between her and anyone else. She lived next door to the courthouse and had a green ’73 Coronet wagon also.
What if the Niedermeyers had one of the 4 factory ’71 383/4 speed Coronet wagons….
Interesting article. I love old Mopars and the quirky things one sees on them. I admit to not having given the 74 Coronet much thought. I always have considered the 74 Coronet and Satellite to be the ugly ducklings of their generation. At least among 71-74’s (I cared much for 75-78’s either.) It’s hard to tell from the tone of the article if you are being serious about how much you love the 74, but you have given me pause to reconsider the front end. So far, it still strikes me as kind of generic and tacked on. It does have a certain industrial, no nonsense appeal to it I’m starting to see…
I have always thought the fuselage Coronet styling only worked at all on the early loop bumper cars. They give the car a streamlined look that it was clearly designed to have. It loses that with the heavy separate bumper, which looks like a grafted on afterthought.
I’m a little biased towards the loop bumper because I owned a 72 in high school in the late 80’s. It was the same baby blue as the top photo car and had no options except 318/automatic and full wheel covers. Even had rubber floor mats. I thought that car was so cool!
What I find interesting is I watch pretty much every 70s-80s action cop show and movie I come across, and I’ve seen every singly iteration of 71+ B body 4-door hurled down a hill into a flammable wall, I cannot think of a single one with a 74 Coronet. That’s how rare of a sight they are. Maybe it’s just that lack of familiarity but I actually think they’re the most visually appealing, as I don’t like the softness of the original loop bumper design, I don’t like the single headlights of the 75s and I despise the stacked headlights of the 77s. The result is incredibly generic, almost cartoonishly plain if that’s possible, but it all kind of works together better. I agree with the taillights in the rear bumper, I normally find them a sore spot in any car with them(most 68-72 GM A bodies) but for some reason never minded them much on these, the 74-78s, either. I think it’s the bigger wider size of the lens that helps, the 71 Charger design never bothered me either for the same reason (Satellite coupes, yes).
I have to admit I never considered myself much of a Chrysler afficianato outside of the muscle car era, so you had me going for a sec with the notion of the legendary and aspirational Coronet name before I exclaimed aloud “wait a minute”. Toyota did in fact mimick something these 71+ Coronet did however, spinning the coupe off with distinct sheetmetal from the Camry with the Solara.
These weren’t too common when new. I never cared for the restyled front and rear for 1974 – it was as though Chrysler was trying to turn its intermediates into formal “Broughams” on the cheap, after the swoopy 1971 redesign failed to gain much traction. This would become even more apparent with the 1975 and later sedans and wagons.
The 1971-73 models at least reflect a consistent design philosophy – even though it was largely out of step with what the market wanted as the muscle-car era rapidly faded from view.
Our neighbors had a 1971 sedan in light metallic blue with a black vinyl roof. I remember riding in it and being surprised at how much road and engine noise infiltrated the interior at highway speeds. It was almost as bad as our 1973 AMC Gremlin in that regard!
I was used to full-size Oldsmobiles, and even our 1967 Delmont 88 Holiday sedan, which was nearing the end of its time with us by that point (1976) and had hit the 100,000-mile mark, seemed much quieter and smoother than the Coronet.
No wonder Chrysler came within a hair’s breadth of bankruptcy in 1979. Compare this with a colonnade sedan, and the colonnade is FAR more appealing stylistically. Then despite GM’s problems, the colonnades were better put together out of better materials than this car. The midsized segment was growing by leaps and bounds as the full size cars had grown far too large for most people and this boring, slab sided, no trim, dated, El cheapo taxi looking thing was the best they could do? Even the bloated and overstyled Torino looks better to me than this.
In 1974, I would have gone regal four door, then Cutlass, then even a nicely equipped dart would be preferable. The lesabre styled Monaco might be a stretch but worth it.
The problem with the Mopars was that even the top-of-the-line versions came across as dressed-up taxi cabs. The Fords had much nicer interiors, while the GM Colonnades looked more modern and up-to-date on the outside.
I agree completely. Anybody who spent 5 minutes in a 1971+ B body from Plymouth or Dodge had to look past an awful lot of cheapness. Those cars had a lot of good in them, but the bodies and interiors were just awful. The doors sounded dreadful when they closed, trim materials were bargain basement, and even though the cars had one of the tightest structures of anything built, they could not manage to avoid building it so that the steering column juddered every time you slammed a door. There was almost nothing about these cars that provided any sense of quality.
In my friends’ 74 Charger the hood was wavy and would jiggle going over bumps. The trunk lid seemed to lack any kind of sealant between the sheet metal surface and the backing structure so that the sheet steel would slap the backing when closing the lid. My friends’ dad sprayed some expanding foam into the cavities to solve that one. My buddy called it The Coke Can (it was red) because its shape recalled the Coke bottle, but it felt as stout and lightweight as a cheap aluminum can.
The Fords were the opposite. The doors sounded great, the interior materials were probably the best of the three, and the car felt thick and heavy. But while they had their charms, they lacked much of the goodness that came in the Mopars. The GM Colonnades were kind of a midpoint between the other two in terms of subjective feel, but handled very well and were probably considered by most to be the most modern and attractive.
Great article! Sure made my day. More pix to come. Thanks!!
More pics
Look what’s for sale on Craigslist Long Beach
A Broughamish interior too!
There are a couple of car lots in Toledo that seem to specialize in old clunkers from down south or out west that are free or nearly free of rust, but are kind of sad otherwise. One day, I was across the street from one of them and saw a ’76 Coronet that actually looked pretty good. It was Earl Sheib medium blue with Cragar S/S wheels on it, with a black vinyl interior that was in OK shape, except for the front seat, which was totally trashed. Under the hood was a 4 barrel 360 that I’m pretty sure was from a ’74 Roadrunner or Charger, as it looked exactly like the engine in my ’74 Roadrunner, and was much cleaner than the rest of the engine compartment. Torqueflite, of course, with 3.55 gears, if my seat of the pants feel was correct. It drove fine, no issues at all, and I wanted it so badly. They wanted $7000 for it and if I had it, I probably would have pulled the trigger. A friend almost bought it, he wanted an “old man’s” companion to his ’71 Roadrunner, but his wife killed the deal. It sat for week after week and I saw it running a couple of times, and then it was gone. About six months or so later, there was a local old Mopar show, and there it was, with a totally redone interior. I talked to the owner and he got it for $6200, and put about $2500 in it to get the interior fixed and the paint shined up. He confirmed the engine was a ’74 360 HiPO (245 HP) originally from a Roadrunner. I’ve seen it a couple of times since, it still looks great, and sounds good when he gets on it.
nrd515,
That sounds like a very cool car to me. On Craigslist, I often see decent looking Southern-sourced old cars with clean bodies and totally trashed interiors. I always wonder why they don’t at least get a seat cover, or some decent floor mats. A little bit of effort goes a long way when it’s that trashed. But maybe they want you to see what you’re actually buying.
I may have just answered my own question…
I like these Coronets much better than the later stacked-headlighted Monaco/Furys. Much cleaner style. Having a hot motor in one would be awesome!
Missed this one when it first posted. What I find curious about these ’74 Mopar B-Bodies is they came up with the rear clip they would use through ’78, yet the front ends both used one-year only treatments. Not sure why they weren’t ready with the full refresh.
That exact green Coronet is on craigslist again right now, I shit you not- https://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/d/madison-1974-dodge-coronet-custom/7399264347.html