What do you call a Toyopet found in the wild? A Toyoferal? This 2nd generation Corona, which looks like a mini imitation-crab American mid-‘50s design, is the first Toyopet I’ve encountered on the street. I got close, prudently, and took a few photos. It didn’t seem too ferocious, so I smiled and even muttered a few kind words. But I didn’t go as far as Toyopetting it.
It’s almost impossible not to see other cars in one you see for the first time in the metal. That’s especially true of older Japanese cars. The rear lights on this Corona reminded me of the Renault Floride / Caravelle, for instance. The profile had a Fiat feel to it, the front end was giving me some Ford vibes… or Opel… or perhaps even Simca? Something that wants to look American but doesn’t quite manage it, like many European (and most Japanese) cars of the era.
It was really difficult to get decent picture of this wild-caught example, but as luck would have it, I encountered a domesticated one at the Toyota Megaweb Museum that was almost exactly identical and quite happy to be photographed. Same colour inside and out, same trim level – how lucky can a CC writer get?
The only minor discrepancies that I could see were a couple of slightly different badges and the museum car’s front wing turn signal repeaters. The latter looked non-standard – bad job there, Megaweb. But I’ll forgive you because the rest of the exhibits were so great. Must write that up sometime…
Some carmakers managed to find a sort of magic formula very quickly and establish themselves in a matter of a few years. Others had to work real hard for a long time to achieve success. The former could include the likes of Jaguar, Citroën or Porsche – they worked out the secret sauce and quickly found a customer base. For Japanese carmakers, I’d nominate Honda. The more I find old Toyotas, the more I put them in the latter category – they really slogged for many, many years before they got it right.
Take something as seemingly simple as a marque’s name. It’s not always easy to get it right the first time (hello SS-Jaguar), but Toyota seemingly could never make up their mind. They started as Toyoda – the founder’s name. For partially esthetic and esoteric reasons, this was soon switched to “Toyota” in the mid-‘30s, even as the firm started making their first automobiles. Inexplicably, the firm decided to switch to “Toyopet” in 1947. They released a new Beetle-like car, the SA, which they felt needed a diminutive name to go with its diminutive size. But then the name stuck and infected Toyota’s products for years.
And it really isn’t a great name in at least two major foreign languages. In English, the conjunction of “Toy-” and “-pet” make it difficult to take the brand seriously. It sounds like a made-up marque from a children’s book, something so cutesy and cuddly that it might get eaten by your neighbour’s Buick.
In French, the main issue is that “pet” translates as “fart.” Contemporary francophone publications routinely sniggered at the “unfortunately-named Toyofart” and you can see their point. Datsun, Mazda or Subaru never had to overcome such issues. They were made-up brand names as well (respectively for Nissan Motor Corp., Toyo Kogyo Co. and Fuji Heavy Industries), but they didn’t sound ridiculous to dozens of major potential export markets. Putting the marque name to one side, there is also the question of the actual cars themselves. And here too, Toyota’s learning curve was a long and steep one.
By the late ‘50s, as Toyota’s confidence grew and Japan’s economic boom progressed, exports were high on the agenda. The Toyopet Crown, a fully grown 1.5 litre car, went to Australia and the US, just to see if it might be welcome there. It wasn’t. Neither market was very impressed by it – it was slow, not particularly well designed and ill-suited to highway conditions. But that’s all Toyota had to offer the world, at that point in time. The T10 Corona (above), launched in 1957, though a new 1-litre compact family car, still looked pretty rough around the edges. Toyota deemed it not yet export-worthy.
Yet because the Crown didn’t do all that well out in the non-JDM world, the Corona was re-engineered (perhaps a bit hastily) and given a chance to shine. Launched in April 1960, the T20 Corona looked more like a modern car than its predecessor. Once it got the Crown’s engine under its bonnet in 1961, it was peddled to several foreign markets. For whatever reason, they decided to keep “Toyopet” but ditch the “Corona” bit; it was known as the Toyopet Tiara in most export markets, including the US.
In that market, the Tiara replaced the Crown in 1961 and promptly flopped, much to Toyota’s dismay. They pulled out of the US market for a couple of years as a result. The Tiara did a little better in Australia, where it was assembled in 1963-64 – the first Toyota put together abroad. However, things were not off to a great start anywhere, including on the home front.
The T20’s novel rear suspension, which combined a single leaf springs and coils, as well as the relatively fragile-looking greenhouse, meant the Corona struggled to appeal to JDM buyers. It was perceived as far less durable than its main rival, the Datsun Bluebird. Taxi companies shied away from it and sales were initially rather sluggish. The suspension was more comfortable, but it just couldn’t handle Japan’s then-rough road network.
The introduction of the 1500 Deluxe, in October 1961, gave private JDM sales a shot in the arm, especially since the complex “cantilevered” suspension was also replaced by a sturdier pair of semi-elliptical leafs already seen on the Coronaline pickups and wagon. The car’s reputation improved, but negative first impressions are always difficult to shake off.
Transmission-wise, the T20 came standard with a 3-speed manual, which is what our feature car seems to be equipped with. But the 1500 was available with either the Saxomat automatic clutch or the fully automatic 2-speed Toyoglide. Although I’m not overly fond of this car’s exterior looks, that interior is just wonderful. That row of big white switches under the beautiful radio set is just excellent, though I’m sure not exactly user-friendly.
I’m also a sucker for this kind of colour scheme. White steering wheel, turquoise and baby blue upholstery with checkers on the sides and generous amounts of brightwork… Nice to see something other than gray plastic and carbon fiber for a change. The legroom isn’t much to write home about, but given the average size of Japanese people 60 years ago, it was probably deemed quite sufficient.
The exterior of the car is more of an acquired taste. The more I look at it, the more I see a mid-‘50s Opel. Better than the T10 Corona’s 1949-Ford-that-shrank-in-the-wash look, but still a bit too derivative. The greenhouse and doors are a bit too slanted for their own good, too. The T20 and the Publica were the last Toyotas to be somewhat amateurish in their appearance, in my opinion. Later designs, which would include the S40 Crown, the 800 Sports, the T40 Corona and the Corolla, showed Toyota designers had fully mastered their art. And just to prove it, they also did the 2000 GT.
The Toyopet name also took a step back. It’s difficult to ascertain when it disappeared from each model exactly – it depends on the market. As far as I can tell, when Toyota re-entered the US market in late 1964, the Toyopet name was gone for good. The T40 Corona was always badged as a Toyota there, as far as I know. I’m not sure about other places, like Australia, New Zealand or Europe. On the JDM, though, the Toyopet marque was kept on some models, including the Corona, until the late ‘70s. And it’s still the name of one of the main Toyota dealer networks, so it hasn’t completely disappeared. But the Century, the Corolla and the 2000 GT were always badged as Toyotas, so it seems that even by the mid-‘60s, the Toyopet experiment was winding down.
The T30 Corona, also known as the Corona 1900, was added to the range for the 1964 model year. It had the Crown’s 1.9 litre 4-cyl., but by this point the body was really showing its age. The T20/T30 was not a bad car per se, but it seemed inferior to the Datsun Bluebird and the Prince Skyline. Toyota learned from their mistakes and made sure to hit the nail on the head for the next generation, the T40 Corona, which was unveiled in September 1964. It really proved to be a smash, both on the JDM and in export markets.
I’m not too keen on the T40 Corona myself, though having studied a coupé up close at the Megaweb Museum, I can see a certain charm to them. The T20 we have here is more interesting in many ways, as it is so ‘50s-looking and has that jukebox dash. It’s a bit goofy on the outside, though, with that silly name plastered on all corners. Wouldn’t kick it out of my driveway though.
Related post:
Vintage Review: 1961 Toyopet Tiara — From Small Things, Big Things One Day Come, by Eric703
CC 1969 Toyota Corona — At All Started Here by PN
Regarding the Toyopet branding as strange; yeah, I guess, but at least here in the US, it’s just “cutesy”. I literally rolled my eyes when I read you comparative example, however. Buick? Bu sounds like boo close enough and ick is literally there…. Yeah, my toy pet got ate by the boo ick… Wouldn’t you rather? Not me for the most part, lol.
Doesn’t single digit on the top line of the licence plate mean it’s one owner from new? Whatever, it’s a very distinctive registration
Great find! Haven’t seen one of those in ages. Jim.
Toyota never fully withdrew from the US market, they continued to offer the Land Cruiser even in those years they were regrouping the passenger-car segment.
What I find most interesting about Toyota’s semi-withdrawal from the US market is that it worked. They realized the Tiara was a failure in the US, but I suppose by continuing to sell Land Cruisers they could maintain their dealer and administrative network. Then when Toyota returned to the US with the Corona in the later part of the decade, it made up for the Toyopet’s shortcomings, and Toyota never looked back.
Like Tatra points out here, “negative first impressions are difficult to shake off,” but Toyota managed to do just that. One wonders if they had kept the underwhelming Toyopet for sale in the US, how much harder it would have been to slip away from those negative impressions.
What a cute car, I have never seen one outside of a book.
Neither have I ever encountered a smiling lady changing a tire whilst wearing heels, gloves and a gown. Obviously my life is deficient in this regard 🙂
Granted, I don’t know Mrs DougD, but I suspect she wouldn’t be willing to re-enact that scene. 🙂
Har, she’s changed a tire but no gown and definitely no smile 😉
Yes, there is a lot of odd in this design. That straight-on side view is the worst, with almost every vertical line leaning backwards. That shape of the windshield/front door glass looks like a copy of that era’s Studebaker , but that’s about the only overtly American comparison I can come up with.
Yes, the Toyopet name – uh, yeah. All I can think is Chia Pet, but the Toyo came first.
“every vertical line leaning backwards” has some functional advantages:
1) Reduces likelihood of head-banging on door opening frame on entry/exit
and, assuming that the door hinges also lean backwards:
2) It helps the open door clear a tall curb (because the door swings slightly upward)
3) Interior of opened door is somewhat shielded against rain/snow (due to the same upward tilt)
4) Door closing is gravity assisted.
I actually find some similarities in the body design (if not the mechanical) with Skoda’s 1000 MB, another “not quite right” car from the same era…
If I were to glance quickly at the opening picture here and try to immediately guess the make, my first guess would be a Humber… though admittedly I’m about as unfamiliar with Humbers as I am with Toyopets. Very accurate description here that the design appears that it “wants to look American but doesn’t quite manage it.”
Great article here — I’ve never taken the time to clearly understand the intricacies of Toyota’s models during this period. And the Toyoferal here (love that!) is immaculate, it’s hard to believe that it wasn’t the one in a museum.
What a fine catch and write up. Just finished reading a contemporary review of one in a moldy Car & Driver. They considered it half backed overall but liked the engine.
That was a great write up!
I learned a lot and was very impressed with the persistence of Toyoda/Toyopet/Toyota.
Neat! Um, in that black-and-white photo above the graf that starts In that market, the Tiara replaced the Crown in 1961 what is the lady doing?
Lifting her Tiara?
Oh, it’s a bumper jack! I couldn’t discern that in small size on my phone.
H’m. Not really on the list of things people usually do in car-promo pics, is it.
Different times-
“The Toyopet’s jack is so easy to use, anyone can effortlessly lift the car”
“provided you ensure you always drive it onto a carpet first.”
The ToyoFlatus Rarified Gaseous Envelope of The Sun was always destined for a new name.
I’d forgotten that “corona” also means part of the body resembling the top of the head: what on earth was the obsession? Crown, Tiara, why I’m surprised they didn’t try the Toyota Bowler in early-’60’s London, or the ToyoYarmulke for Israel, though by that time, the car itself was a bit old hat (oh yes, I did!)
I have somewhere once seen one of these oddities here, though as a ute, mouldering on a farm somewhere. A bizarre purchase for conservative country folk back then.
Got to agree it doesn’t do much for the aesthetic environment, this, but I too rather fancy that interior, so I’d just have that in my driveway after kicking out the rest.
Great write-up, it is getting more and more difficult to find material that outlines the history of many brands of cars, so it is interesting and enlightening.
Yes, this car looks very French…from the front.
Yet, as others have noted, there is also that look from the side that the rear is sagging. Not something seen on this car’s contemporaries.
Looking at that row of push-buttons under the radio it looks like they are heater and wiper controls…I say that because they are marked H1 H2 W1 W2.
Great find and terrific write-up.
I’m actually a bit surprised that the Tiara didn’t sell better in the US. I can see why the Crown bombed, because it was too expensive, heavy and underpowered. But the Tiara didn’t have any of those issues; it was quite an appealing package, except perhaps for its styling, which really wasn’t out of the norm for the early 60s.
the T40 Corona, which was unveiled in September 1964. PininFarina had been consulted for this one – a wise choice,
Really? I never heard that before, and I sure can’t see PF’s hand anywhere on it. I was always under the impression it was 100% homebrew. It certainly looks that way. PF did consult with Nissan at the time, and it shows quite obviously in the fine lines of the 410.
Frankly, the T40 was hardly a fine styling job, but it was innocuous enough to not be seen as a negative. It was just such a compelling package in terms of its performance and amenities, especially compared to the VW, for about the same price. But I don’t think anyone ever thought it was going to win a beauty contest.
I haven’t heard of the PF/Toyota linkup either. My understanding is that Toyota very deliberately decided to go it alone when all the other JDM manufacturers were consulting with Turin/Goertz.
I do think Toyota was looking directly at PF for inspiration. Though it’s a bit hard to tell here, their 1963 Corona Super Sport concept (top) borrows a lot from the PF Cadillac Jacqueline, and their 1961 Toyopet X (bottom) from the PF Cadillac Starlight.
Sorry to reply so late, guys.
You and Paul are quite right — I’m not sure where I thought I read that, but it’s BS. PF worked with Nissan at the time. I amended the text.
Arigato for setting the record straight!
My understanding is that the Japanese are very big on numerology. The name was changed from Toyoda to Toyota because the latter is written with a more favorable number of brush strokes. This may be the esoteric reason T87 mentions.
Great write up. The front end of the T20 reminds me of a Simca, the rear and side profile a Fiat, and the hubcaps a ‘53 Studebaker Loewy Coupe with a wee bit of Avanti.
Per Wikipedia only 318 Tiaras were sold in the US! It’s remarkable that Toyota became the largest car company in the world, producing 10 million vehicles a year, and its 200 millionth vehicle back in 2012.
It’s interesting how this “big” Toyota is so alike in design as its bread and butter (or perhaps “hardtack and lard”) sibling. The Toyota 700 (it was called a Toyota around here, Toyopet was a larger pick up, go figure) was pretty common in Uruguay, in 2 door sedan and tiny wagon bodies. Something that I found curious was that all of them had heavily tinted green glass all around. That, and the steering column gearchange.
You can see here how the front is very identifiable in both cars, as is the rear styling (the lights might even be the same), and the steering wheel and gear lever are probably the same.
These only feel familiar because of watching “Man in the High Castle” on Amazon Prime.
The West Coast scenes are full of Japanese vehicles from the 50s and 60s.
Yes toyota Tiara, I could not remember the name I’d seen it under to begin with but that was it built back when Toyota was still finding its feet there is the odd ute still about in Aussie somewhere Ive never seen a sedan in the metal but two utilities have been observed, its rival the Datsun Bluebird ute seems to have been more popular or maybe they survived better who knows now but Ive seen more of those.
I remember seeing these around. But as you say, Datsun got off to a better start in Australia.
The Toyopet name came from a contest in 1947, so it was (at least ostensibly) selected by the public. (The modern example of “Boatie McBoatface” more recently is a reminder of how that can go.)
I think there were a number of reasons for adopting the Toyopet name. As I mentioned the other day, there was really little or no market for passenger cars in Japan until well after the war, so the SA and its successors were kind of a departure for Toyota. Also, the war and the postwar production restrictions had put Toyota in a precarious financial position, the most dramatic result of which was Toyota having to spin off its sales organization as a separate company, Toyota Motor Sales. (It was eventually reintegrated with the manufacturing company, but not until many years later.) So, in 1947–49, the value of Toyota as a brand was ambiguous, to say the least. There was not any question that Toyopet was a Toyota product, but I think it was a brand that could potentially succeed Toyota, in the same way Ford Australia contemplated phasing out the Falcon name in the ’60s after the XK Falcon stumbled.
Toyota later applied the Toyopet name to the first of its separate JDM dealer channels, and the last time I checked, there are still Toyopet Stores in Japan. The Corona and I think a couple of other models continued to wear the Toyopet badge into the ’70s at home.
The Toyopet name came from a contest in 1947, so it was (at least ostensibly) suggested by the public. (“Boatie McBoatface” is a more recent example of how THAT sometimes goes!)
At the time, Toyota was really flailing financially, which had a number of weird results. The most dramatic was the spinning-off of Toyota Motor Sales as a separate company, but I suspect the launch of the Toyopet brand was at least partly founded in a similar concern: wanting to stake out some assets in a way that could, if needed, be disassociated from the Toyota Manufacturing Company and its then-shaky future.
A few years later, Toyota used the Toyopet brand name to launch the first of its additional home-market dealer channels, which paid off for them in a big way by letting them expand their dealer base. The last I checked, there are still Toyopet Stores in Japan, and the Corona and I think a couple of other models kept their Toyopet branding into the ’70s at home.
I don’t think native English speakers generally have the “pet”/”fart” association, although “Toyopet” does sound too cutesy for automotive duty, except maybe for some kind of retro-styled small car.
I too, really like that interior picture ! .
-Nate