It took a few years, but I finally found one! Ever since moving to Japan back in 2019, I’ve been keeping my eyes peeled for a number of must-find JDM rarities, mostly from the ‘60s and ‘70s. The Mazda Cosmo was one, as was the Prince Skyline GT, the Honda Z360 and the Autozam AZ-1. Still waiting on a curbside Toyota 2000GT, but I’ve seen a couple in the wild. It’ll happen someday. Hinos were also on this bucket list, but until late last year, I had not seen a single one.
Well, that’s not exactly true. I did manage a single photo of a Hino-Renault 4CV, but those are not the genuine article. I like me a 4CV just as much as the next man, but coming from France, they’re definitely not as exotic as a Contessa 1300.
The problem with Hino cars is that they really did not exist for very long – and that was quite a long time ago. And unlike Prince, whose technology, dealer network and nameplates continued to exist long after it merged with Nissan, Hino’s automobile side was meticulously and expeditiously eradicated by Toyota when they took over, leaving only the truck side of the business active. But let’s do things chronologically.
Originally part of Tokyo Gas & Electric Co., Hino Heavy Industry was spun off as a manufacturer of Diesel engines, military hardware and tanks in 1942. Reorganized as Hino Motors after 1945, the firm focused on heavy-duty buses and trucks with great success.
Joining the rush to get into the passenger car game came a few years later, when Hino started assembling the aforementioned Renault design in 1953. Within five years, Japanese-built 4CVs were 100% locally-sourced. Production continued until 1963, but Hino felt they could muster their own designs well before that.
The Contessa 900 (PC) was launched in 1961 as a Hino’s first in-house effort. It was like a parallel universe Renault Dauphine – albeit without anything proprietary from the French firm, of course. The licensing days were coming to an end.
In 1964, Hino launched the completely reskinned Contessa PD saloon, featuring styling courtesy of Giovanni Michelotti and a new 55hp 1251cc engine, still located aft of the rear wheels. This was followed by a sporty-looking coupé in April 1965. Before the end of the year, a twin-carb 65hp engine became standard on the coupé and optional on the saloon.
Base model saloons came with a column-mounted 3-speed, but most cars (and all coupés) left the factory with a four-on-the-floor. Aside from this, the 1300 Coupé’s sole exclusive technical improvement over the saloon was its front disc brakes.
The main selling point of the Contessa coupé was its racy looks and bespoke dash, both of which were bang up-to-date for the mid-‘60s. The steering wheel on this car is not the original item (though the wheel hub is), but not too far from it. Sportiness was the name of the game.
The quad headlights in those big chrome bezels, along with the lack of a front grille, do give the Hino a Corvair vibe. But the Contessa’s shape is not as influenced by the little Chevy as, say, contemporary rear-engined NSUs. The Michelotti family resemblance with the Triumph 1300 is far more perceptible in the overall shape, particularly from the B-pillar back.
But even the great Michelotti could not perform miracles. In real life (and to a greater extent in photos), the Contessa coupé’s proportions are a little odd, with that short wheelbase and long tail. In profile, there are some definite similarities with the BMW 700 Coupé authored by the same designer.
But compared to the BMW, the NSU or the Triumph, the Hino was destined to have a rather short and lacklustre production run. Part of that was beyond Hino’s scope, but plenty of it was down to the company’s own decisions, like any good Deadly Sin story.
The issue with Hino’s car range was its limited (i.e. single platform) nature, which did not make for many opportunities for economies of scale. The 1.3 litre engine was also used in the Briska pickup, but those shared little else with the Contessa. The overwhelming majority of the company’s business was and remained big trucks, which were a completely different kettle of fish.
Hino still tried to compete with the likes of Prince and Honda on the track, as evidenced by the stunning (but stillborn) 1967 Samurai racer. It was the brainchild of American racing driver Peter Brock, who raced Contessas in the mid-‘60s with some success. The Samurai featured the Contessa’s 1.3 (in race spec, pushed to 105hp), but everything else was tailor-made in the USA. Alas, it came too late.
The Japanese government, in its infinite wisdom, decided that there were a few too many carmakers in Japan. The fragmentation of such an emergent and strategic sector (Japan was already the world’s fourth car producing country by 1965) was cause for bureaucratic concern, as a dozen separate domestic businesses – as well as an increasing number of foreign ones – competed for slices of the same pie, growing though it might be.
So the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, in conjunction with some of the larger Japanese banks, tried to arrange a number of mergers. Prince Motors and Aichi Machine Industry (makers of the Cony kei trucks) ended up with Nissan. Toyota got a controlling stake in Daihatsu and took over Hino. There were a lot of other plans involving Subaru, Suzuki, Isuzu, Mitsubishi and Mazda, but these failed to gain traction – foreign tie-ups ended up being the solution for some of these firms.
Merger talks between Hino and Toyota got under way in January 1965 and were finalized by October 1966. Part of the deal was for Hino to ditch the Contessa altogether and switch their small vehicle line to produce Toyota Publica vans instead, which was done by the spring of 1967. Contessa production officially stopped around this time, though a trickle of cars were still put together (our feature car included) past that date. The very last batch of Contessa 1300s was sold in early 1969.
Why did Toyota nix the Contessa range as soon as they could? There were a couple of good reasons, the first of which was that it was the only domestic rear-engined car in its class. The future of the platform was bleak from that point of view. The legacy Renault rear swing axle setup was antiquated and the 1251cc engine, good though it was, was surplus to requirements from Toyota’s point of view.
The other big issue was that Hino just couldn’t sell that many Contessas. They could barely muster 10,000 units per annum on the home market for the 1300 saloon – the coupé, for its part, was nothing more (and nothing less) than a halo car, garnering yearly sales in the hundreds. The market had spoken, and the word was “Meh.”
And it wasn’t as if the world outside of the Asia-Pacific region was clamouring for Hino cars, either. Some were exported, sure. I even found a French test from 1966, so Hino were bravely trying to sell their cars in some very tough places. The problem was that the Contessa, which had little to recommend it save for its exoticism and looks, ended up costing 15-20% more than a Simca 1300, a Renault 10 or a Peugeot 204. Some Contessas were also sold in Benelux, where they seemed to have fared little better.
Hino even sent a few cars in kit form to be assembled in New Zealand and Israel. Work was undertaken by the local Kaiser plant in the latter country. The car had a relative moment in the Levantine sun and Israel became the Contessa’s top export market. But with only 4300 units made locally from 1965 to 1968, volumes remained modest.
Just over 55,000 Contessa PD saloons and only 3868 coupés were made – a clear bomb for a car in this class. Toyota refocused Hino towards trucks and buses and never looked back. Hino’s venture into the car market was undercapitalized and based on technology that, though it still seemed promising in the ‘50s, was actually a dead end.
Stuck with a platform that made it isolated at home and uncompetitive abroad, Hino played the styling card as well as they could, but it was not enough to overcome the Contessa’s shortcomings. Deadly Sin though it may have been, the Contessa 1300 was still a valiant effort. And what a looker, especially in coupé form.
Related post:
Automotive History: 1964-1967 Hino Contessa 1300 – The Japanese Corvair?, by Allan Lacki
I never saw any of the coupes in New Guinea, though the sedans were a regular sight in Lae.
I’ve never seen one in Australia, though I seem to recall Wheels magazine calling it a car that “managed to both under and oversteer at the same time”.
I have a feeling Kaiser-Illyin in Haifa assembled a bit more than 4300 – if you count the previous model (see typical 60s ad) and 1st and 2nd gen Briskas, they were everywhere in Israel when I was growing up in the 60s and gave many Israelis their first taste of Japanese engineering (watered down by Israeli quality control at Kaiser-Illyn…) at a time when all other Japanese manufacturers (other than Fuji) avoided exporting to the country for fear of losing much more profitable sales in Muslim countries.
Yes, the 4300 number is just for the Contessa PD 1300 – the PC 900 and the Briska would have added to that number quite a bit. Lovely collection of period pics, btw! Thank you for providing those. The police cars are especially delicious…
The funny thing is only two trucks were ever imported as the Israeli administration of the time had an agreement with Leyland which gave it, more or less, a market monopoly in so far as trucks and buses were concerned. Also Illyin was not connected politically, something which (among other things) led to the fall of Kaiser-Illyn. But that is another story…
One more Israeli police Contessa on street patrol for you:)
… A less imaginative Israeli ad for the 2nd gen Contessa.
Israeli police had them too… The “big” pursuit cars were Studebakers, all Kaiser-Illyin offerings.
But only one coupe was ever imported for Mr. Illyin himself and unfortunately it did not survive (picture source Yaron Coral).
Incidentally, the Dauphine was also assembled by Kaiser-Illyin and the fact Renault did not want to continue the relationship was the reason why Illyin turned to Hino.
I always thought the saloon had a neue-klasse vibe going on, but the coupe just doesn’t look right.
Yes, it does a bit, but the Triumph resemblance is much bigger. The Contessa had the same kind of front end as the 1963, also Michelotti designed, 2000 saloon. Headlamps, indicators on the corners just above the bumpers.
Combined with the 1300 / Dolomite rear end (the greenhouse, rear wheelarches, long rear side bumpers) it could easily pass as a Triumph.
While I was aware of these styling similarities before, I never knew the Contessa was rear engined!
Triumph 2000
The pictures make the rear look quite a bit longer than it looks in the advertisement for it in the “related post”, I would have thought the pictures to be more accurate until I saw your comment about how they perhaps accentuate it more than in real life (or ads?) It’s the one (or the most) disjointed thing and a little hard to overcome. The overall vibe is a bit of a european bumpercar of the early 70s (or late 60s I guess) aesthetic, most notably due to that large rear grille. Which, I hasted to add, is mighty impressive and one of my favorite features here. Along with the interior which looks great.
Hmm, as I write and pan back and forth the the pictures, perhaps I like it more every time I look at it, The rear (in profile) perhaps looks like “speed stripes”, or the visual effect of something passing a lens shutter at high speed which I can get on board with. The unfamiliarity aspect (with parts of the styling being familiar though) is probably the culprit.
I’m glad you finally found one more of your targets, and the street you found it on is undoubtedly a large contributor to that. Perhaps setting up a tent behind one of the benches and devoting a few weeks to a great outdoors lifestyle might be a worthwhile endeavor in order to make short work of the rest of the list?
Hehe… It’s a little nippy to camp out right now, but I’ll consider your suggestion come April/May.
Hino? Somehow I’ve never heard of them, maybe in relation to buses and larger trucks but not cars.
Looks vaguely like a Panhard 24 CT from some angles, though not nearly as well executed as that French cutie. The sedan looks more like an early BMW 1500 New Class. And who is Bride and what’s the deal with the imitation Recaro stripes?
Bride is a Japanese aftermarket seat manufacturer much favoured by the tuner crowd.
Definitely a Triumph 1300 from the wheels back, only it appeared a year later. Wonder how happy Triumph were?
Given the limited production I doubt it would have troubled them much. The first time I saw one of these was in a 1968 ‘Observer’s book of Automobiles’ I picked up in the late 1980s.
Hino Contessas were assembled in NZ by Cambell motors along with other brands Toyota took over and the Thames assembly plant began churning out Corollas,
Hino survived as a truck brand still available new they make good durable trucks in all sizes but a little underpowered in the semi size units @ under 500hp
A single word in one of the ads in this post caught my attention. We know that Hino’s cars were never exported to the US. Except they were… sorta.
According to that ad, you could buy a Hino in Guam, which had been a US territory since the turn of the 20th century. Little tidbits like this fascinate me for some reason.
Hinos were actually exported to Hawaii in the early 1960s as well. Below is an ad from a Honolulu dealer:
“Hino” even sounds “Hawaiian”.
Thanks, Eric. Learn something new every day around here!
That’s what a DAF 55 with a rear engine and 4 on the floor would have been like. Oh so Michelotti. The DAF also came as a coupe
The Contessa 1300 was Pete Brock’s first Japanese ride, before he hooked up with Nissan and begat a legend.
Great find – I think I’ve only seen five here in thirty years, and a couple were at car shows.
I still find the Michelotti styling appealing.
I think we may be conflating two drivers with the same name in this article. There’s the late great Aussie touring car legend who raced for Holden (always called Peter), and the American designer and driver who brought Nissan to fame (who always seems to have gone by Pete). It’s the American Pete Brock who was involved with Hino, not the Aussie.
Aha! Two Brocks don’t make a right, it seems. Thank you for clearing that up, I’ll correct the text.
No worries. If you’d only ever heard of one, why would you suspect there were two? 🙂
Mind you, about the time Hino went racing, our Brocky was driving for Austin, sort of…..
Another fascinating niche in history .
I’m curious about the government mandated manufactures thing ~ IIRC Ford picked up Mazda in 1967…….
-Nate