(first posted 10/12/2012) The 1980s ushered in a seismic shift in the U.S. automobile market. The trend that had for generations carried Detroit ever higher–longer, lower and more powerful–no longer attracted the young demographic as it once did. Performance was still popular, but now an increasing number of emerging new car buyers preferred it in something small, nimble and of high quality. And right there–as though it had staffed its planning committees with recent Hogwarts School graduates–was Honda, with products sure to draw those new buyers into Honda showrooms all across the country.
In the U.S. in the 1980s, Honda could do no wrong. Throughout that decade the company went from strength to strength, as Honda sales marched steadily upward (and increasingly spoiled Honda dealers made more money) year after year. Even so, Honda planners could sense a ceiling on the U.S. market–and believed that a new car line was needed to smash through it and take the company to the next level.
Honda was an upstart, a maverick of a company. While Toyota and Nissan had been building cars even before the Second World War, Honda was originally a parts supplier that had expanded into motorcycles; in fact, their first attempts at passenger cars seemed to have more in common with motorcycles than the typical sedans of the day. The first Honda car exported to the United States was the teeny Honda 360, which most Americans–even those who’d gotten used to VW Beetles–tended to view as a sub-car. (Ditto the more powerful Honda 600, CC here.) Even the 1973 Civic, Honda’s first “real” car, was a curiosity that appealed mainly to college students.
Nevertheless, Honda kept improving the Civic and, in 1976, took the next step up with the Accord (CC here). Even as continuous refinement produced evolutionary and incremental growth in both cars’ size and features, people still thought of Hondas as well-built (and increasingly expensive) starter cars. As Honda owners grew older and wealthier, their natural move up the automotive food chain would be to larger and more expensive cars, like BMW and Audi.
In 1986, Honda did what no established car builder had done in the U.S. since the Edsel: Launch a completely new brand. Sixty new dealers were the points of introduction to Acura, and their first task was to teach America to not pronounce the name accenting the middle syllable. The new brand’s slogan was “Precision Crafted Performance”; it might as well have been “Sell lots of cars and make lots of money”, because that is precisely what Acura did with its two new models, the executive-class Legend, and the smaller, entry-level Integra.
In 1985, the Integra was introduced in its home market as the Honda Quint Integra. Although the Japanese lineup included a four-door sedan, only three- and five-door hatchback Integras were introduced in the U.S., in March 1986. The hot hatch segment, led by the Volkswagen GTI, was then popular in the U.S. and elsewhere. But rather than copy the GTI’s lusty, torque-y grunt and Teutonic personality, the Integra took a different and more Japanese direction. Honda took the basic Civic platform and then went to work on it. While the Integra’s unique torsion bar front suspension was essentially the CRX’s, its longer wheelbase removed the choppiness.
The 1.6-liter engine was a honey. Smaller than the VW’s 1.8, the Integra’s mill was a 16-valve DOHC design that did its work higher up the tach. Its fairly meager 99 ft/lbs of torque arrived at 5,500 rpm (compared with 3,000 for the VW), and it made its 113 horsepower at a lofty 6,250 rpm. Actually, there were two different versions of this engine: the 1986-87 version, known as the browntop (from the color of the valve cover); and the blacktop version, used in 1989-90 cars, which was good for another five horsepower and four foot-pounds of torque. Both engines were vintage Honda – smooth and sweet, all the way up to the nosebleed-inducing redline, and producing a 0-60 time of about 8 seconds. Subjectively, the GTI might have felt quicker, but an Integra would beat it to 60 by nearly a full second.
When these cars came out, I had a girlfriend who’d been driving her late grandfather’s whaleback ’78 Cutlass. Gad, but I hated that car. It was that awful, washed-out yellow with GM’s trademarked diarrhea-brown interior. She was thinking about buying a new car and asked me to go with her to check out an Integra. I was driving an ’85 GTI at the time, and thus quite conversant in hot hatch. We test- drove a gold-color, five-door automatic. Her unwillingness to consider a five-speed for such a sweet car was undoubtedly the first crack in a doomed relationship. But enough of my troubles. I recall that while the structure was not quite as tight as my VW’s, the car was quite nimble. The power train did nothing to dissuade me from believing that automatic transmissions were invented for lazy American torquemaker engines of the 1950s, and that whomever hooked one up to a high-revving, four-cylinder engine was a moron. Still, when you could get the automatic to hold onto a gear for a bit, the 16-valve engine could put a big smile on my face.
The car was quite a success in the U.S., and was named one of C&D’s 10 Best for both 1987 and 1988. U.S. sales during the car’s four-year run totaled 220,000 units, reaching a high of 77,000 in 1989, the final year of the first series. Who bought all these cars? Although Integras became favorites of the street racer crowd, many buyers were not whom you might think. My stepmother traded in a Ford Tempo on one of these, a black three-door automatic. She was no racer girl, but in the late 1980s there was something about the vibe of an Acura that told the world you not only had your wits about you but some style as well. Did Acura’s early success lead to the introduction of Lexus and Infiniti a few years later? It certainly didn’t hurt.
With so many of these Integras running around every part of the country, where did they all go? I cannot speak for other regions, but here in the Midwestern U.S., about a third of them ended up at the hands of Fast and Furious wannabes who gave them funky paint jobs and fart mufflers, while the rest dissolved into flaky residue on well-traveled thoroughfares. When I found this particular car in the parking lot of a shopping center, it dawned on me that I could not remember the last one I’d seen, let alone one in this condition. It took a little doing, but I identified it as one of the later cars by the subtle changes to the front end. Black stains around the exhaust– the harbinger of some significant repairs–make me fear for its longevity, though. I hope that this car’s owner has bonded with this Integra and its many charms, and keeps it singing for years to come.
Being first is not always the best thing. With the 1989 appearance of Lexus and Infiniti on American shores, it began to look as though Honda’s luxury brand hadn’t aimed high enough. Suddenly, the slightly upmarket cars in Acura showrooms did not seem quite so special. Their new competition had maintained a high-tech aura while also adding some serious luxury to it. The result was that while Acura customers traded in Hondas and Oldsmobiles, Lexus customers traded in Cadillacs and Mercedes. Unable to fight its way out of a crowded middle market, the Acura brand has seen its efforts ebb and flow over the years.
Then again, perhaps the “Lexus concept” has colored our perception of what an upper-level Japanese brand should be, which would be a shame: When taken on its own terms, the original Acura Integra was a compelling and endearing car. If you liked that hard-to-describe quality that made a Honda a Honda during the 1980s, then the original Integra might well have been that true Honda essence, distilled into its purest form.
Wow, this post brings back fond memories! I bought a new silver four (five?) door Integra in 1988 and owned it for about 6 years as my daily driver. I loved that car. The hatch made it very practical, but it was fun to drive with a great suspension, sweet engine and the best-shifting transmission evah. You could shift with your pinky, it required so little effort.
The Integra gave me trouble only once. There was a recall on an ignition component, and the replacement part failed and left my wife stranded along side the road the day after the repair. Other than that, it ran like a fine watch.
One thing the photos don’t show is how low this car is, and how close the seats are to the ground. On the other hand, the low beltline and all that glass gave great visibility. Even when going slow, you always felt you were going fast.
I sold my Integra because despite all its good attributes, I really didn’t fit in it all that well. Any trip greater than two hours gave me a back ache. That was something the Integra shared with many Japanese cars of the time: six-footers need not apply. I sold it to a couple from the Philippines, both about 5 feet tall. They loved all the space.
One effect of owning the Integra was to heighten my standards for performance. I replaced it with a new M3, but that’s a story for another day.
Lovely site! It’s always fun to find enthusiasts who love these kinds of cars, but it’s always harder to actually find the cars!
I have a 1987 Acura Integra with only 95,xxx original miles – clean title available for sale *now*.
http://seattle.craigslist.org/skc/ctd/3400487257.html
It’s a special car that only a handful of folks will really appreciate.
how much are you asking for it?
These cars are part of why I think of the amorphous “Malaise Era” as having definitively ended in 1986. For the first time, you could choose from:
– An SUV that worked as a daily driver family car: the Jeep Cherokee.
– An upmarket American FWD sedan that wasn’t faux-Brougham: the Taurus.
– An upmarket car that combined German refinement (and a little cache) with Japanese reliability and cost of ownership: the Acura(s).
I always liked the five-door hatch Integras. Legends are sharp too, but I’d take a second-gen two-door. Such elegantly proportioned cars. Pity that these nameplates went away, and a few years later, the clean styling did too.
It definitely didn’t end in 1986. The Beginning of the end was 1982 when the Mustang GT debuted and for the first time in years the specific output of a given engine increased. However many cars continued in their Brougham ways for another decade or so.
In early 2000 I bought an ’89 RS base model (steelies and no rear headrests) in good shape with under 90k miles. Same color, 3-door, 5-speed, bone stock. It was an older car even then, but with an investment in new timing belt, struts, tires and clutch it ran flawlessly and was really, really fun to drive. I made several coast-to-coast trips and the generous hatch allowed me to fit a ton of stuff in the back.
The relatively rare 5-door body style always seemed a bit more practical and grown-up. Had it been one of those, I may have kept it longer than 3 years. Mine likely would have run forever.
Owning a product built in Honda’s “Golden Age” completely won me over to Honda goodness. However, when I could afford and purchase a new car in 2003, Honda and Acura no longer offered anything nearly as practical, stylish and fun. A five-door Civic would have suited me, but it wasn’t available in the US. And today, apart from the Fit, I think this is still the case.
My sister had a Canuckistan only 4 door sedan model, I believe a 1990. It was a great car that in typical Honda fashion was impeccably well built. She loved the car but was regularly taken to the cleaners by the local Acura dealer. I kept telling her to only specify the service operations she wanted but she was gun shy after burning out the motor on her POS GM Safari van. She then sold the car because she thought the running costs were too high.
Too bad, she’d probably still have it. She does, however, still drive Honda products. Now she listens to me about the service!
Great write up on a great little car. What a gem. Your comment about older buyers hit close to home: Stephanie’s uncle bought one, a red two-door hatch with an automatic, because his leg couldn’t handle the clutch on his immaculate ’69 VW Squareback anymore. He had been an airplane mechanic, and I’ve never seen anyone keep their cars so meticulously; OCD, actually. He cleaned them daily. When he passed away, someone (probably one of his grandkids) ended up with the world’s cherriest Integra.
There’s a fair number still around here, some a bit ratty.
These are definitely a rare sight these days. A friend of mine had a four door in white that he scrapped not too long ago after the engine gave up the ghost. These topped the list of most stolen cars for a long time which I think helped lead to their demise both by thefts and high insurance rates. They are both easy to steal and a desired source of parts by Honda Civic owners.
In Norway Honda sold a lot of these Civics and Accords. However we never had an Acura for sale in Norway. The Civics and Accords mostly had the 1,4 or a 1,6 liter engine. Some of the Accords had a 2 liter Straight four engine with 130 bhp, who was considered as a lot here in Norway around that time (late eighties).
The cars where reliable, but don’t you ever try to crash in some of them.
I agree. I owned an ’85 Honda Prelude it was a great car. I’d consider another Prelude or a Honda Station wagon (I could use both), but alas, Honda no longer sells either car with either the Honda or Acura brand.
It seemed as though these cars were everywhere in the late 1980s and early 1990s and have virtually disappeared today.
I wonder if this car’s success led to Acura’s problem with market position over the long term. They were great cars and their owners loved them, but the Integra was so popular that it was easily as important to the brand as the more expensive Legend. Thus, people didn’t automatically associate Acura with luxury cars. Toyota, on the other hand, launched the LS as the first Lexus, and has always kept it in the line-up, so Lexus has maintained its luxury image, even as it has expanded downmarket to survive.
The article notes the number of Oldsmobiles traded on Acuras, which is interesting, as the brand has become what Oldsmobile was during its heyday in the 1950s and 1960s. The big question is whether there is a market for that type of brand, given that the true luxury brands have been quite aggressive in moving downmarket with cheaper models. If you can get an Acura or a Benz for the same price (thanks to lease deals), well…from a status standpoint, it’s no contest.
I agree with your market-positioning assessment, but wasn’t the Camry-based ES250 the first Lexus launched in the US? I seem to remember those, along with the 2-door Infiniti (M30?), appearing shortly before the big V8 Lexus LS and Infiniti Q45.
I was incorrect – the ES and the LS were introduced together at the North American International Automobile Show in January 1989. It was the LS that got all of the press, given that Toyota was directly taking on the Mercedes-Benz S-Class Benz.
i wish id splurged on one when i was impressed with the turqoiuse and not so nice mettalic red mauve…
a bargain when i first saw them at the auto show in la
In another CC thread earlier I noted about why Acura dropped the Integra, Legend, and Vigor names, in preference to lettering the different models instead. The term “Integra” had eclipsed the brand name “Acura” in the public’s awareness. Rebadging the models was imperative to the brand’s name recognition. I always thought Acura was trying to emulate German “understated” luxury (think Benz E-class); while Lexus and Infinity were more of an American version of luxury cars. All three of these up-market Japanese brands were to attract those American car buyers who just couldn’t, or wouldn’t, accept “that tinny jap crap”.
Integra didn’t have double wishbones ’til ’90 when it was based off the ’88 Civic platform. ’86-’89 Integras were built off of the ’84-’87 Civic and had a McPherson strut/torsion bar combo design, i.e. geometry and damping in a strut unit but springing provided by torsion bars. Rear suspension was by dead-beam with coil springs & panhard rod.
Good catch on the suspension, pshoar. I had found a source that referred to double wishbones in these cars, but after your comment, further research indicated that the double wishbones came in the later cars. I have amended the text to reflect the correct design, which was torsion bars on the front, which permitted that really low hoodline..
I have read that the 2nd gen Integra was preferred by the showy crowd, as those cars were easier to lower than the Gen1 torsion bar cars.
If it has torsion bars it is not a McPherson strut suspension, the McPherson strut suspension is a very specific style of a front strut suspension that among other properties is that it has coil springs.
Wait a minute, did you take this picture in Bloomington? I saw an automatic 3-door light blue version near the post-office there this past weekend, and was surprised by how not-rusty it was. It think it had a faded dealer decal from Oklahoma on it.
This car was captured in a shopping center in northeast Indianapolis. I saw it fairly regularly for awhile, and assumed that it was someone who worked at one of the stores. I shot it this past summer, and I suppose that it could belong to an IU student who had a summer job.
The Acura concept was a lot closer to the Japanese market multi-channel distribution than the full-on luxury marques that Lexus and Infiniti established. I seem to remember somewhere that part of the reason Honda launched Acura was that they wanted a thicker-on-the-ground dealership network but for some reason they weren’t able to just launch more Honda stores. Maybe something in their existing franchise agreements?
Anyway, the cars were just subtly more upmarket than standard Hondas, much like Mazda’s efini and Eunos chains in Japan.
The problem is that both the EU and US markets have become hollowed out to the point where there are cheap brands at the bottom and luxury brands up top, but not much in the way of the old mid-range brands. Hence, you’ve seen the deaths of Oldsmobile, Pontiac, and Mercury. Acura falls into the same trap, IMO.
Maybe it has to do with the hollowing out of the middle class in many parts of the West, as well, but I don’t want to digress into politics. What I will say is that the idea of a new car for the “lower class” doesn’t really exist, now that crash regulations, emissions laws, and feature creep have conspired to make even the cheapest new car a luxury many cannot afford.
The luxury brands have expanded downward in both the United States and Europe. It’s hard for a middle-price brand to compete with a Mercedes or a BMW at the same price point.
In the United States, many of the low-price brands have also expanded upward. Ford, for example, has moved into what should have been Mercury’s old spot with the Titanium trim level of its passenger cars.
Ha! Took the words right out from under me. The mid-price cars haven’t so much been obliterated but proliferated. The low-price makes have gradually incorporated more and more “luxury” features as standard items at every new model update, rendering the usually platform shared mid-pricers redundant.
High-priced makes today are ultimately saved by having a slew of unique, sophisticated and expensive to produce platforms not viable in in a lower priced segment… yet at least. For now and historically, the features(gimmicks) are the easy parts for the mid, followed by the low-priced makes to adopt. That’s why a new Ford Focus has as many standard options as a 90s Lincoln.
“What I will say is that the idea of a new car for the “lower class” doesn’t really exist, now that crash regulations, emissions laws, and feature creep have conspired to make even the cheapest new car a luxury many cannot afford.”
Joe, I think you’ve hit on yet another perversity of our economy, which is that many people who can’t really afford fancy cars buy them anyway, thanks to cheap credit. In a major metro, you’ll see plenty of 20somethings in Lexii and Beemers. For the time being, these folks will blow $400-$500 a month on a lease and then turn it in in 3 years, rolling over to a new car and new lease. It’s not prudent, but if you’re going to do it, you really don’t save much by leasing a stripper, so they go for the glitz.
I’m a cheapskate, so “even the cheapest new car” is a luxury to me. Plenty of 3-year-olds off lease. 🙂
My brother-in-law bought a 4-door Integra new in 1990 and still has it. He recently bought a second one that is identical save for the automatic transmission, and my neice and nephew are learning how to drive in that one. They were great cars and the visibility out of them in every direction was second-to-none (unlike most of today’s cars).
I consider the late 1980s to the late 1990s (into the early 2000s in some cases) to be the golden age of Japanese cars.
I agree that the era up to 2000 was the best for Japanese cars but one has to remember that they were much better than most of their competition in those days and they could charge a premium and get it. Since then, the competition has really caught up and the Japanese companies have been flummoxed by exchange rates. It was Y125 to the dollar in 2000 and now it is running Y75-80. At the same time, the Korean Won has gone from W800 in 1997 to W1200 (give or take) which has helped them tremendously on the models, like the Elantra and Accent, still made in Korea.
I recently got a 2002 Infiniti I35 for a friend of mine, like new, for $6000, only 100,000 km on it. A perfect example of just how good Japanese cars of the era were.
Amazing how engine quality allows someone to buy a car with 100k miles and…..the buyer thought he made a sound investment?
the visibility out of them in every direction was second-to-none (unlike most of today’s cars).
A big pet peeve of mine. I drive older cars, a mid-90s Accord at the moment. I can’t believe how poor the visibility out of today’s cars has become. I recently rented a Ford Fiesta that essentially had no rear visibility until I chucked the back seat headrests, and even then not much. And I rode in a friend’s Camaro which reminded of nothing so much as an armored personnal carrier.
Acura branding doesnt exist here they all sold as Honda still lots on the roads too the 2 door hatches being popular with the reversed hat boyracer crowd.
Excellent CC on the car and more interestingly how and why it appeared and succeeded. My hot hatch was an ’87 Celica, built on the same formula, basically extended off the Corolla. I chose the Toyota over the Acura mainly on styling, that Celica knocked me out. For early-middle-aged computer engineers like me, these FWD Hot Hatches made perfect commuter cars, sharp, personal, great to drive in all weather, practical, durable and not too expensive.
Acura’s story is round three of what made Honda in America in the first place. It’s a classic example of the now well-known high-tech business principle called disruptive innovation. Honda’s emergence from below to dominate the motorcycle market is one of Clayton Christensen’s case studies in his classic book, “The Innovator’s Dilemma”.
In 1959 Honda sent three guys to LA to scope out the US market. Then the only American motorcycles were big heavy V-twins ridden by cops and ‘dangerous’ guys in leather jackets. To save money, the Honda guys roomed together and just had Super Cubs to get around on. Honda built big American-style bikes at first. No red-blooded American biker would be caught dead on a Japanese anything in 1959. Big flop.
One day some college kids saw them up in the hills messing around on their Super Cubs. They thought these friendly little bikes were great fun and took to them like crazy. By 1964 it was a phenomenon and the Beach Boys had a hit song. “Its not a big motorcycle / Just a groovy little motorbike / Its more fun that a barrel of monkeys / That two wheel bike / We’ll ride on out of the town / To any place I know you like”
Harley and the others never took Honda seriously until it was too late. Honda aggressively established that business and moved up from there into all sizes. In the 1970s they did exactly the same thing with small cars, first “Super Cub” 360s and 600s, then Civics, then Accords. Again in the 80s, into premium cars with Acuras like this Integra.
Honda was doing better in the 80s when they were selling only 3 models in the US. They built the models so well, that often times a Civic buyer would buy the next generation Civic rather than buy an Accord. American car companies built decent luxury cars but horrible economy cars. I have great respect for a company that pays attention to detail for even it’s cheapest entries. Fast forward a couple of decades, Honda is still doing well, but is no longer the gem it once was. Too many modes and too many directions leads to a decline in quality and increases buyer confusion.
And by the way, I liked the concealed headlamps on the Accord and the Integra in the 80s. They should be brought back.
Pop-up lights have become more difficult due to regulatory changes — mainly recent European pedestrian safety standards, but also the push for daytime running lights. Modern headlight technology (and lighting regs) have also reduced one of the major practical rationales for using pop-ups: trying to integrate the headlights at the regulation height while still having a low or sloping hood. We probably won’t see pop-ups make a comeback any time soon, although I wouldn’t necessarily be surprised if other types of concealed lights came back in fashion at some point.
My Grandparents were early Acura adopters in the 80s(probably in their late 50s-early 60s at the time), both a red Legend and a silver 4 door Integra. I remember both of them fondly, as did they when I talk to them(the Legend is still daily driven by their neighbor, the current owner). When the time came to move on they ended selling the Integra for a Mercury Villager, and later, the Legend for an Infinity G20.
I owned an 88 up until last year and loved it.
A little tight on headroom but a great little car, practical, fun and sporty, quite reliable for its age. The engine was a marvel, it just loved to be revved.
Unfortunately rust was taking an inevitable toll on the body and it needed work in a few other areas, so we sadly parted at 280k miles.
I really wish Honda still made an Integra-like vehicle, I just don’t see anything out there today with the quite same attributes.
I hear that, Mike. Our family ran Fords in the late 70’s and 80’s….until my brother bought a used 1980 4 door Honda Accord sedan from a Doctor friend who sold after putting 75k miles. Boy, was my brother lucky to get that car to commute to med school from Yankton to Vermillion, SD. When I finally was allowed to drive it….the driving experience was refined and impressive in ways that words don’t pay justice to.
Then, my mother picked out a 1989 4 door Honda Accord loaded with options that couldn’t be believed for inexplicable quality, comfort, size and surprising joy of driving. The novelty led my younger sister to swap that Accord with me for her new Ford XLT Ranger pickup (that she had picked out and customized)?
Later, a used Infiniti Q30 was acquired from my brother to steal my mother’s loyalty. Now…mom and Dad have two Honda Pilot’s in the garage next to a 2004 black C5 vette. By the way…. A nine year old low miles C5 vette is still one of the best daily driver car values out there for those who remain single and unencumbered by passenger service.
I used to see these and the next generation all the time in high school. The ones that the midwest rust didn’t do in were usually killed by their last owner. I remember one blowing an engine when a classmate decided that he wanted to do a burnout after school.
I’ve never been exposed to a small Honda. My dad has had Accords since 1990. Very nice reliable cars.
Best car I’ve ever owned.
R.I.P.
Back in ’88 the Integra 4 door was one of my 3 finalists for a new vehicle. The other two were the Trooper II and a Nissan King Cab. Although I loved the Integra the best, I had just bought an old house and knew lots of HD trips were in the future, so I went with the Nissan which served me very well for 13 years and 200k.
This was certainly one of the cars where Acura found their mojo. No, they weren’t Lexus level luxury, but certainly more sporting and a notch above the then Honda offerings.
Reading this curbside classic brought back memories. The 1987 Integra RS was my first car, and as a responsible young lad, I got the 5 door model which was useful for taking my parents to the market every other week.
But fun was on my mind too, so the 5 speed manual was a must. This engine was before V-TEC, but it could rev smoothly to 7000 rpm. Driving on the right side of the tach made the car pull confidently.
The DOHC sticker on the doors always reminded me of the tech under the hood. I liked the decal, but I noticed its absence in the blue one for this story. At the time, Acura was ahead of the curve with its tech, driving dynamics, amenities, practicality, and affordability. I also liked the Integra’s looks — sedan’ish, but really a hatch / liftback.
I’ve attached a photo of my Integra and my dog. Sadly, neither are with me anymore, but I will always have fond memories of both.
Nice clean looks, low cowl and belt-line for superb visibility, excellent quality, great interiors, zingy engines…I really miss Honda. You’d swear the people using the Honda/Acura names today were a different company…
This one really hit home for me. My family was all grown up on these Acura’s and Honda Civics. I never realized that they’re practically the same car. It was a good throwback to go through the history of it and it does leave me a little sad now… where did they all go on the road? From my dad’s car, my first car to my brothers car we all ushered in amazing roadtrips with these reliable golden nuggets on wheels.
Back in ’88, this was the car which placed a close 2nd in my car shopping to the Accord DX hatch. Now it cornered very well, but the Accord’s torque won me over. 16 years of economical, pleasant, trouble-free motoring. Probably would’ve been no different with the Integra.
My 88 integra still driving it today this car was made the year I was born currently has 187,580 miles on it got planes on fixing it up wht u guys think
To me it looks rather generic. That’s not intended as an insult…it is nice looking…but as recognition that although it was a unique product when new, its imitators succeeded in cloning it, so that the entire market segment wound up comprising a lot of cars that made a very similar impression on the observer.
I bought a 92 Integra 4 door with automatic. These are/were very robust cars, however…. The automatic transmission acted as a boat anchor when pulling away from any kind of stop. And, as they get older, the plastics (inside and out) become brittle.
Strangely, I’ve never seen any of these 1st generation cars….or not that many, given the “ricer” treatment. The 2nd, and definitely the 3rd generation models are most often modded.
I bought a 1990 Legend and drove it for 16 years. I had eleven years of no car payments, plus 228,000 miles of pleasure, driving that car. I sold it to one of my employees and he enjoyed several more years with it. It was undoubtedly the best car that I have ever owned. I have attached a photo of the car when it was over ten years old. At Oak Mountain State Park in Alabama.
It was great re-reading this great piece of Acura history, James. Haven’t seen a first generation Integra in quite some time either, possibly not since I was out in California a few years ago. Nonetheless, I’m proud to carry on the Acura tradition.
Honda went to the trouble of having mirror-image directional wheels (incorrectly installed in this example, most likely due to tire rotation)
Honda doesn’t do that anymore (check out the latest CR-V, Pilot and Odyssey)
Last one I saw was last summer I believe
Not many left of the 1st gen or 2nd gen even here in southern Cal.
Occasionally see one on Craigslist in near-death condition.
An ’88 5-door automatic was my college, graduate school, and first job car, passed down from my parents. It actually had a few issues, including the igniter update (Honda didn’t call it a “recall”) and of course it rusted around the wheel wells, although the subpar “rustproofing” the dealer applied when new probably made things worse. Many of the rest of the issues were maintenance issues as I frankly had to learn how to properly maintain a car, sometimes the hard way (such as avoid quick oil-change places).
But wow, it was a hoot to drive, and it was well packaged and practical. Tons of character with that revvy engine (that begged for a manual), and its handling was a revelation if you were used to the typical American car at the time like I was. Yes, we all knew these were just upscale Hondas, but Acura was quite the revelation in the late 1980s: well-engineered (rusting and weak CV joints not withstanding), well-built, high interior quality, great ergonomics, low beltline, great visibility, more utility and packaging than you’d believe for its size. Everyone I knew with an Integra – or Legend, for that matter – raved about them. I haven’t seen a first or second generation Integra for years now – I’m sure almost all have now either succumbed to rust or were modded to death.
I mentioned this the other day, but it’s worth noting that calling this generation the first Integra is arguable. The Integra’s lineal predecessor was the Honda Quint, which debuted in February 1980 through Honda’s home-market Verno channel. It was based on the second-generation Civic platform, but was longer and wider (although the track dimensions are about the same) with a longer wheelbase and the 1.6-liter engine from the contemporary non-U.S. Accord.
The Quint wasn’t sold in the States, but it was sold in some European markets as the Honda (or Rover) Quintet, which I think may have been part of the original point of creating it. It wasn’t especially sporty; it was basically a family hatchback, intended to fill out the Verno line, give Honda something more to sell in Europe, and to help make up for the fact that Honda had only a couple of products while Toyota and Nissan offered fine gradations of size and price from B-segment on up.
So, the Quint Integra was the second generation of that line, intended to be more sporty than the original. I don’t think that was entirely with the U.S. in mind; when the first Quint was introduced, the Japanese market was still kind of unsure about hatchbacks, but by the time this generation was designed, home-market buyers were starting to decide they liked the hot hatch idea. I think the idea was that the Quint Integra could sort of straddle the gap between a Toyota Corolla FX and the lower end of the Celica/SIlvia range.
Loved the appearance of the first and second gen Integra. Low beltline, large windows make for a slick appearance and good visibility, especially compared to the high beltline, especially in the rear, look of today.
These were thin on the ground in west Michigan at the time as Acura dealers were few and far between.
Having moved to the Detroit area in 96, where the dealer network was better established, I checked one out in 97. Unfortunately, they made the moon roof standard and it ate too much headroom. I bought a 98 Civic hatchback instead.
The Integra was renamed the RSX for it’s last generation. Again, frustration at the auto show as I couldn’t get a comfortable amount of headroom, even with the seat as low as it would go. With Michigan’s third world pavement, tight headroom means a dented head from hitting the roof as we bounce from pothole to pothole.
The RSX was dropped in 06. The dealer still had an 06 on his lot in Feb 07. The perfect car: black on black, manual trans, fabric upholstery, not the high strung “S” engine, and tagged at $2,000 off the sticker. Managed to wedge myself into the seat enough to clear the roof, and off we went. Brilliant shifter! Throws were so short, compared to my Civic, that I didn’t think it was in gear at first. It’s implementation of V-Tec gave the engine flexibility far beyond my peaky Civic. Pulling a steep hill that the Civic could barely maintain speed in 5th, the RSX flew. Wondering how deep the well of midrange torque was, I tipped into the gas, on the hill, in 5th. The car lept ahead. In spite of the tight headroom, I offered $500 below the tagged price, cash, with my checkbook in hand. Dealer said “no”. They would not go one penny below the tagged price. Gave them my contact info and went home. In a week’s time they had not come to their senses, so I put the money back into a CD at the bank.
Maybe I was being greedy trying to get more off, or maybe I was lucky as it was a tight fit in that car. The Civic served me well for another 6 years.
Love these cars. They are a rare sight now in Rhode Island. I wish Acura would bring back their original names on their cars. Can’t tell you how many of my customers mention owning a “Legend” or an “Integra” and were so very proud of those cars. It is too confusing for consumers as nearly all of the brands now use some sort of Alphanumeric system.
Here’s the story of my 89 Integra LS. A good car, but I didn’t like it much.
http://thecarsofralph.blogspot.com/2014/02/car-mistakes.html
Does anyone have or know where to get ground effects or some call it a body kit for a 1988 acura integra ?
1988 Acura Integra – the favorite of my cars. The one I got my license with, and still mourn almost 20 years later. It was an automatic, but that was just as well for a 17 year old driver.
Years later I would have a Fox Mustang with the Pinto 4. THAT was the definition of SLOW.
Interesting write-up and comments. I owned a 1988 Acura Integra. Overall a great car. Mine was a nice shifting manual, and was great fun to drive. The engine was an absolute jewel.
Gorgeous!
I have fond memories of this car. My mother owned one of these as her first car. An ’87, dark grey 5-door hatch. She got her license in her 40’s and this was the car my father bought for her at an auction. This was in 1997 so this was already 10 years old. This was the biggest car we owned as my father still had his ’88 2-door basic sentra, so this functioned as the “new” family car. About 5 years later, I learned how to drive in it. Still remember that ’80’s Honda interior smell 🙂
Unfortunately, she totaled it by getting hit by a truck. She was fine, but very shaken, and the car was barely road worthy. This came at the worst time as I was supposed to have that car as my own, while she got something newer, but oh well.
I have fond memories of this car. My mother owned one of these as her first car. An ’87, dark grey 5-door hatch. She got her license in her 40’s and this was the car my father bought for her at an auction. This was in 1997 so this was already 10 years old. This was the biggest car we owned as my father still had his ’88 2-door basic sentra, so this functioned as the “new” family car. About 5 years later, I learned how to drive in it. Still remember that ’80’s Honda interior smell 🙂
I remember it being comfortable and spacious enough for the 4 of us. At this time i was growing taller than my parents and my father’s car was getting pretty small, so this a nice “upgrade”. Especially with working A/C.
Unfortunately, she totaled it by getting hit by a truck. She was fine, but very shaken, and the car was barely road worthy. This came at the worst time as I was supposed to have that car as my own, while she got something newer, but oh well.
It is now 9 years later than the story and these cars are now rarely seen on Bay Area roads I travel which is East Bay, The City, and North Bay. If you see one you will be damn lucky to see it in original unmolested condition. Too bad as I liked the car but it must be manual and in OEM condition. Those days are gone…
There were a lot of very nice small cars in 1988 – so one didn’t need to drop a lot of coin on a fancy Honda. Sure, they are nice. Hondas are nice. So are dozens of other cars. So I don’t get all gooey when I see this fancy Honda. Yeah – nice.
What else have you got?
Ha, saw a clean white OEM 91 on the freeway today right down to the correct wheel covers. Could use a wash and an automatic based on watching the driver in some stop and go right next to me.
I’ve never owned a Honda, have stayed over at VW, but part of that is timing, when I was in the market for a car, what was available that came closest to what I was looking for. I came closest in 1986, when I was looking at an Accord Hatch, which I liked but for their option packages (which were new to me back then though they are now everywhere). I wanted the fuel injected engine, but they only offered it (that year) in the LXi, which also came with power windows/locks which I didn’t want (little did I know how soon they like fuel injection would become standard in cars). VW didn’t (yet) have option packages, and all their Golfs came with fuel injection, so I bought an ’86 GTi. Acura came out with the Integra a year or two later, and I wasn’t in the market any longer, otherwise I might have considered it. Frankly the Integra was probably closer to what I have than the Accord, which was a bit larger, but I miss the “midsized hatch” offering which used to be available, I guess starting with the Accord, the X car Citation, then the short lived Camry hatch. The Accord Hatch disappeared in 1989, only a few others have sprung up, regrettably in years I wasn’t in the market (626 hatch, Honda Crosstour, and the Chevy Malibu Maxx, and the recent Buick Regal Sportback, maybe leaving out a BMW hatch somewhere in there).
Anyhow, I’m still with VW (40 years now) but wondering what I’ll replace my ’00 Golf with. Don’t want an SUV nor crossover, though that’s probably what I’ll end up with due to process of elimination; Golf is down to single model (GTI) and Kia and Hyundai have eliminated their Forte 5 and Elantra GT models; as has Chevrolet Cruze hatch and Ford Focus hatch. The hatches left are a bit small for me, I’d like to go bigger than Golf, but not smaller, but don’t want crossover nor SUV. Acura isn’t on my list …whoops, I just got on Acura website and the Integra is returning, but no mention of what guise it will take; since Ford Mustang has turned into an electric SUV, can’t tell by name what it will end up being, but maybe I’ll finally be able to consider one during my (admittedly infrequent) buying window.