Ford’s tie-up with Mazda, enacted in 1979, gave birth to a very long and stupidly complicated family of blue oval-badged variations of Hiroshima designs assembled in and chiefly destined for Asia-Pacific markets. This included Japan, where Mazda-based Fords were made throughout the ‘80s and ‘90s, despite the oddity of the situation. I mean, imagine Toyota building and selling Chevy Impalas under their own brand in the States – why would they that, and how could it ever work?
Well, Ford were trying as hard as they could to elbow themselves a place in the rising sun, along with being able to shift a range of capable smaller FWD cars to Australia and Southeast Asia, to go alongside their larger (and very expensive) Detroit-built offerings. The plan had a lot of merit, but the Japanese side of the equation never really gelled, as we can see from the brochure above: all the cars on the left were slightly modified locally-made Mazdas, with limited exotic appeal, and the ones on the right were all imported and gigantic, and thus heavily taxed. Conspicuously absent from this brochure was any European Ford, which could both have ticked the LHD import snobbery box and the right-size-for-Japan box.
What was also lacking was a solid dealer network. Mazda did provide their Motorama dealers, rebranded as Autozam in 1989, but the public wasn’t really buying it. And Mazda’s whole branding scheme, of which Autozam was a key part, disintegrated in the mid-‘90s, further weakening Ford’s JDM position. But that’s a whole nother story.
So for the benefit of those of you who do not live in the Asia-Pacific part of the globe, let’s delve into what is a Ford Laser for a bit. The short answer is: a Mazda Familia BF, also known as the 323. The longer answer, and it gets a little complex, is that BF Laser (as it was known in Japan) was sold in many markets as the KE Laser, as well as the Mexican-built Mercury Tracer for North America. There was a whole family of models, including three- and five-door hatches, a cabriolet, a four-door notchback and a wagon.
Not all of these were sold in every market, but Japan did get a very complete array of Lasers. One JDM exclusive was the wagon-based “van” – a bit of a tradition here. It’s basically a bare-bones wagon, usually with extra bars in the back windows. Not sure what those are for, but they’re the tell-tale sign that one is dealing with a work vehicle in this country. Fender mirrors were also part of the deal, but as an option by this point.
Our feature car has the bars but not the mirrors. And it’s obviously been modded slightly, with those rotary phone wheels and all that. Nice to see that someone thought this plainest of Janes would make for a cool sled.
By this point in the Laser’s existence, i.e. generation two (1985-89), engine options had broadened a bit beyond the first gen’s sole 1.5 litre Mazda E5 mill, which was either carburated, fuel-injected or even turbocharged. A more economical E3 (1.3 litre) was available, as was the 1.6 litre DOHC known as the B6 and a 1.7 litre Diesel. JDM vans like our CC could have any of these, as well as an AWD drivetrain with the 1.6.
Doesn’t look like this one has the AWD drivetrain. Plus there’s a choke symbol on that little handle thing near the steering wheel, so I’m guessing the base model 1.5, providing only 70hp (net), is under the hood. Does that justify Recaros? They look about as germane to the rest of the car as a set of white Connally leather armchairs from a Rolls Corniche would.
In 1989, a new generation BG Laser (KE in Australia) took over the range – with the notable exception of the BF wagon, which carried on alongside the new models without much change until 1994. After that, Ford gave up on the long-roof Laser, thereby also leaving the likes of the Nissan AD and the Toyota Caldina without a blue oval rival in the Japanese light van market.
Even if the VW Transporter photobombing this “Ford” is objectively a far more interesting vehicle, it’s also a lot more common, both here and around the globe. The Laser was not a very strong seller in Japan, tallying about a tenth of the Familia’s sales for the BF generation, or about 10,000 units per annum. Ford never did crack the Japanese market – not with their European models, which they did not import for some unfathomable reason (VW were killing it in Japan with the Golf at the time – Ford could have replied with the Fiesta) not with their American ones, and certainly not by rebadging Mazdas. Inevitably, Ford gave up their Japanese ambitions. But it’s interesting to peer back into a time, not that long ago, when they were laser-focused on it.
Related posts:
Cohort Classic: 1989 Mercury Tracer – The Almost Forgotten One, by PN
CC For Sale: 1986 Mazda 323 Wagon with 32,241 Miles – For $5,988 You Can Relive 1986, by PN
Curbside Classic: 1988 Mercury Tracer – The Road To Hiroshima Runs Through Hermosillo, by Perry Shoar
Curbside Classic: 1981-85 Ford KA/KB Laser – A Beam of Light, by William Stopford
CC Capsule: Wednesday Morning Rarities – Ford Laser TX3, In Black And White, by JohnH875
Unique find. I could confuse this with an Escort wagon from a distance. Or even a mid 80s Corolla wagon. The Laser’s unique D-pillar, being its obvious distinguishing feature from Escort design. Nice wheel style, maintains a family resemblance to the iconic four hole wheels on the Escort xr3i.
Personal preference, but I’d perhaps prefer a cleaner Escort-like D-pillar appearance.
Did you forget the fifth gen Chevy Nova?
Fifth generation (1985–1988)
1988 Chevrolet Nova 5-Door Hatchback
Overview
Production 1984–1988
Model years 1985–1988
Assembly United States: Fremont, California (NUMMI)
Body and chassis
Class Subcompact
Body style
4-door notchback sedan
5-door hatchback
Layout Transverse front-engine, front-wheel drive
Platform Toyota AE82 Platform (GM S platform as known within GM)
Related
Toyota Sprinter
Toyota Corolla
Holden Nova
Powertrain
Engine
1.6 L 4A-C (LC9) I4 (gasoline)
1.6 L 4A-GE (LW0) I4 (gasoline)
Transmission
5-speed manual
3-speed automatic
4-speed automatic
Dimensions
Wheelbase 95.7 in (2,430 mm)
Length 166.3 in (4,220 mm)
Width 64.4 in (1,640 mm)
Height 52.8 in (1,340 mm)
Chronology
Successor Geo Prizm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_Prizm AKA Chevy Prism till 1997
The 1988 Chevy Nova was built at California’s NUMMI plant, a joint venture with Toyota. The Nova was really a rebadged AE82 Toyota Corolla.
photo credit Joe Haupt from USA – Cars I Have Owned: 1988 Chevrolet Nova
Right. That’s a Toyota sold as a Chevy in the US. Like the Chrysler/Mitsubishi tie up. The Laser equivalent would be the opposite, i.e. a Chevy sold as a Toyota in the US.
Toyota did sell Chevy Cavaliers in Japan for a few years, or at least tried to. I’m guessing the Japanese could tell the quality wasn’t up to real-Toyota standards.
The 1988 Chevy Nova was built at California’s NUMMI plant, a joint venture with Toyota. The Nova was really a rebadged AE82 Toyota Corolla.
iirc NUMMI also built the Pontiac Vibe/Toyota Matrix twins.
The Chevy Spectrum and Geo Storm were Isuzus. The Chevy/Geo Metro was a Suzuki Swift. The Ford Probe was based on the Mazda 626, which was built in the Ford Flat Rock plant for North American markets.
It’s mostly the classic build/buy decision that we discussed when I was in B-school. Makes sense for lower volume models that would have been cost prohibitive to design and build in-house.
The only Pontiac that I bought in my life was a second gen nummi Vibe which I found btw better than a Matrix assembled in Canada, I would probably have done the same: i.e. buy a Tracer instead a 323 even if made in Mexico .The base Escort was so limply suspended . Nummi at that time had a good reputation of fit & finish what we cannot say about today’s Teslas manufactured in the same place obviously by another owner.
Ford has a tendency to buy cars from other companies, and slap a blue oval on them.
Here in the US, the Mercury Villager of the 90s was a Nissan Quest, product of a JV, where a Ford plant built the Nissan design for both companies.
Ford’s initial plan to dump it’s Indian operations was to sell the facilities to Mahindra, then paste a blue oval on Mahindra products. Apparently, Mahindra did not see any value in that proposal and pulled out of the deal. So Ford turned out the lights and left India.
In China, the first gen Ford Territory was a rebadged Yusheng S330, entirely designed and built by Ford’s Chinese partner, JMC. Wiki is silent on who designed the Chinese market Equator, but it uses an engine designed and built by JMC.
When Jim Hackett was CEO of Ford, he was questioned about whether Ford would pull out of Europe. He replied there would be “Ford branded” products for Europe. “Ford branded”, is distinct from “Ford”, as “Ford branded” could be anything with a blue oval pasted on it. Ford North America has abandoned the smaller vehicle classes, and Farley has said he also wants to abandon the two row SUV market. Ford’s share in China has collapsed to only about 1%, and Ford has abandoned South American production. The cost of creating size relevant products for Europe alone is going to soar, so my expectation is that the EU “Ford branded” product, will be entirely other people’s products with a blue oval pasted on.
Ford are ‘platform sharing’ with VW for LCVs, that is the current Transit Connect is a VW Caddy with blue ovals.
More sharing of LCV and EV platforms is planned I believe.
Familiar family-Ford here, though unfamiliar as the Japan-familiar Familia family.
These were fine little devices in their time, and sold accordingly. From what I recall, they were the best to drive of the small car offerings then about. I suspect if I hopped in one now, I’d be a little frightened of the flimsies: even zoom-zooming along when new they were a bit creaky.
Oz also got (locally assembled and imported) the Telstar, the TX-5, the Laser and the Spectron in the brochure shown. But our Laser sedan was christened the Meteor, which did not make it as interesting as it sounds, or at all.
You posit as amusing the idea of Toyota selling a Chev as a Toyota in the US? Well, it happened here. Under various govt-pushed tie-ups for industry efficiency, Toyota ended up a GM Holden Commodore as a Toyota Lexcen (and Holden the Camry as Holden Apollo). The badging just looked stupid, and no-one except a tight-arse fleet ever bought one. Oh, and my brother, the ideal buyer, as he’s never given a flying furball about cars.
Ah yes, the Button Plan. Seemed that nobody really liked it at all.
The Ford-badged Mazda products were pretty popular in Taiwan when I lived there, drove a Laser sedan (I think the equivalent of a GB or GA) there. Pretty reliable and durable.
On paper that Toyota Lexcen should have been a good seller – didn’t Toyota offer a better warranty than Holden did at the time? But they were all too obviously just a rebadged clone, way out of step with the rest of the model range. Shame they didn’t equip them with a 2JZ, though I’m sure its been done.
Commented, lost it, can a search be mounted please? (This site insists on forever logging me out all the time, even though I press “remember me” every time. I don’t think it wants to).
Having a similar problem with CC
Seeing the VW Bay window photobombing the Laser reminded me of a comment thread about the bars on the rear side windows after you posted a previous van T87, but I can’t remember which one.
Rear engined VW vans used to have ‘jail bars’ inside the third side window and tailgate intended to stop luggage on the engine cover from breaking the windows if it wasn’t secure. Perhaps the bars in Japanese vans had a similar purpose, but it looks more like a signifier that you bought a van in this case.
Along with many, many other Australians, I used to own one of these Fazdas. I had been going to write up a COAL on it years ago but my computer ate my homework, or something like that. Notes diasppeared anyway, and memory getting hazy now, just a lot of disconnected anecdotes.
Mine was the typical Aussie five-speed GL hatch with the single-cam 1.6 carby motor – maybe this was a special parts bin combo cooked up for the ADR emission laws? Bought secondhand with something like 230,000km on it, and managed another hundred thou before I sold it, finally scrapped about five years later. Very easy to drive, quite peppy enough, no wonder they sold so well.
Isn’t Toyota also selling a Subaru BRZ as a Toyota GR86 that was meant for Scion before Toyota abandoned that line of cars.
And it’s newest gen Supra is a modified BMW Z4 thankfully other than the steering wheel (which is slightly different), look nothing alike.
Toyota and Subaru co-developed various aspects of their BRZ/86 twins, tho’ obvs. Subaru was primarily responsible for the boxer powertrain (allowing the lowest possible center of gravity for optimal handling), and the cars are all built at a Subaru factory.
The Scion FR-S branding was only used in the N.American market for its first 4 model years, thereafter becoming the Toyota GR86, whereas the rest of the world always knew Toyota’s variant all along as the 86, or GT86, or FT86, depending on the market.
The BG platform also became the 1991-2003 North American Ford Escort. These had different front and rear sheet metal but the same body structure because the Thule roof rack fit kit was the same for all the 323/Protege/NA Escort/Tracer/Laser. The BG platform made for a better car then the previous NA Escort apart from the CVH engine, and some Escorts had Mazda twin cam engines
After getting married our first car was an ’88 Mercury Tracer LS wagon. Looked a lot like this. One of, if not, the best cars we owned. It took us on amazing trips, including towing our tent trailer up Phase 1 of the Coquihalla, without any issues in the years we owned it. Relatively fun to drive, excellent fuel economy, low maintenance, and versatile.
Fun fact: the BC license plate I currently run on my Forester was also in the Tracer, and a couple of cars before that. If it lasts till 2025 it will be 40 years old. The one tie to most of my vehicles.
Hmm, not edit function. Anyway, fun to see how Ford presented this in its home country. Weird to see what I guess are the locations for the optional fender mirrors marked with plugs.