Dearly beloved, let us spare a moment, a thought and a (mental) funerary wreath for the eighth and final generation of Laurels, the C35. It was a brave and beautiful sporty-ish sedan, very typical of the late ‘90s Nissans. But that, it turns out, was precisely what spelled the nameplate’s doom, as Nissan were circling the proverbial drain at the time and took down a bunch of ancient legacy names with them.
I found two nearly identical cars – both white, later model Medalists (i.e. deluxe trim) with stock wheels. The above was caught in Gunma Prefecture and is the slightly better one, as it’s a Medalist 25 – that means it has the bigger engine, which I guess is a good thing. But no matter what was under the hood, these late Laurels are now fast becoming a rarity, at least in fully stock garb like these. Most of the pics I’ll be using were taken in Tokyo, as that C35 was actually parked curbside rather than in a busy lot, which makes for better photos in general.
Under the skin, the C35 Laurel is a Skyline. Essentially, the nameplate became the Skyline’s companion car back in the C130 of early ‘70s, so nothing new under the rising sun. But up to the 5th generation (C32), the Laurel had a couple of body variants at least. The C33 Laurel arrived in 1989 as a de facto Skyline hardtop saloon, and this positioning continued until the Laurel line ended.
The C33 was a genuine hardtop, but those were about to fall victim to enhanced passive safety regulations, so the body style carried on officially, but a discreet B-pillar was added. Frameless doors do not a hardtop make, I hear you cry. Yes, but that’s what the Japanese definition of a hardtop ended up being by the mid-‘90s, when the last true hardtop saloons died out.
The Laurel ended up being a faux Skyline with a faux hardtop, which became a real headache for Nissan. As long as times were good and people fancied stand-up hood ornaments, all was well. But the economy crashed and the premium car market crashed with it after 1991, leading Nissan down a very perilous path. The C33, made from 1989 to 1992, was the high point of the Laurel nameplate: Nissan sold close to 350,000 of those. By comparison, the C34 Laurel (1993-97) only convinced around 170,000 buyers.
So the next generation of Laurel was clearly going to be a sink or swim situation. The Nissan designers tried their best to give this car a sportier edge than the competition. Because sporty is good, right? People want sporty and a chrome grille. The only problem was that Nissan produced a few too many of these cars themselves. To wit: the pillared-but-quite-sporty Skyline, the luxury-sporty Leopard and several variants of Cedric/Glorias, also of the sportier variety. The Cedric/Gloria and Leopard were V6-powered, but the Skyline had the very same straight-6 found in the Laurel.
It was kind of hard to make sense of the Laurel’s very existence (not to mention the Leopard’s). Nissan‘s management seemed asleep at the switch, letting the ship go off the rails while the wheels were falling off the plane, upsetting the apple cart into a death spiral of a mixed metaphor that ended up rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Shit was about to go down, in other words, and it wouldn’t be pretty…
The C35 Laurel was launched, against the background of its maker’s impending doom, in June 1997. The famous RB series DOHC straight-6 was under the hood, either in 2-litre (155hp) or 2.5 litre (200hp) guise, the latter being also available with a turbo, which bumped power up to 280hp. Sportier trimmed cars were dubbed Club S and did not have the Medalist’s toothy smile, opting instead for a trendy mesh grille. Diesel fanatics could opt for a 2.8 litre six that only provided 100hp, but few such cars would have been ordered.
The only transmission available on this generation of Laurels was a 4-speed automatic. Some models could be delivered with AWD, as well as Nissan’s HICAS four-wheel steering, but otherwise power went to a pair of independently-sprung (and unidirectional) rear wheels.
Laurels were built at the old Prince factory in Murayama next to the Skylines, but when that was shut down (another consequence of the arrival of Carlos Ghosn) in 2001, so the final year of Laurel production was shifted to another site. And in December 2002, the last Laurel went out the door, closing the book on 34 years and eight generations of continuous production. Just over 100,000 of the final generation C35s were sold, making it the least popular of all Laurels. So perhaps nixing this nameplate was the right call…
Nowadays, these C35s are available for a song. These are probably still driven by their first owner, but when time for them comes to buy something smaller or quit driving altogether, some drifter will probably use it as a basis for a street racer. Or it will donate its precious RB to keep a more valuable Skyline on the road.
In summation, it could be argued that the C35 Laurel is the ultimate pre-Renault Nissan Q-ship. These should be available for import in the US from this year, so perhaps a few will make it across the Pacific. It would be like having a Skyline, arguably with better styling, but nobody would know what it is. Very cool, über cool or just the coolest RWD Nissan of the 2000s?
Related posts:
Curbside Classic: 1975 Nissan Laurel (C130) SGX Coupé – Hog Bottom Is Top Dog, by T87
Curbside Classic: 1982 Nissan Laurel “Special Edition” – It Has a Continental Connection, by Jim Brophy
Curbside Classic: 1990 Nissan Laurel (C33) – The Last True Hardtop Sedan, by T87
Finally, CC features a car that I not only love but actually owned! Well, to be fair CC has featured several cars I’ve loved and owned, but I wrote about them myself in various articles… But this time someone else has written about one of my automotive loves, so thank you Tatra87! (The cheque’s in the mail).
My C35 history began in 2009 when I traded my R33 Skyline on a ’97 C35 Laurel Medalist. It was the 137th C35 built and had unusual spec – it was the RD28 diesel, but with the top-spec trim including sat-nav/TV package, two-tone paint and more fake wood than you could shake a stick at.
At the time my job was relocated to the company head office, 120km from my home, so I needed a commuter car capable of travelling 1,200km a week, and that had comfort and economy. The Skyline was great to drive, but being manual it was a (literal) pain amidst the stop-start traffic, and a tad thirsty. I tried a C34 Laurel but that turned out to be completely horrible and quickly died, so selling the Skyline seemed the only remaining choice. Of course 13 years later, the Skyline (which is still around) is now worth five times what it was then…
When I test-drove the C35, it reminded me of my fabulous old C33 – unlike the lousy C34. I wondered if Nissan recognised how beloved the C33 was and was trying to recreate some of that magic. The C33 was by far the best-looking Laurel, but the C35 was a close second, with some sublime detail design – eg the exterior doorhandle shape echoed the headlight shape. It was supremely comfortable, with a superb ride and good handling. The RD28 may have been old technology but it was very economical, and by far the smoothest diesel I’ve ever driven. I loved the engine note too. I loved my C35, but after nearly 6 years of commuting I got a new job just 2km from home instead of 120, and a miserly diesel was no longer needed. Of all the cars I’ve owned, the C35 remains one of my favourites; an underrated design with comfort that was second to none.
Anyway, I’m rambling a tad here, so I’d best deposit a photo of my glorious Laurel, resting on its…oh never mind!
.
Awesome, Scott! A fully-loaded super early model Diesel — talk about a unicorn.
Glad you enjoyed the post. Fully agree that the C33 is the best-looking one and the C35 is also quite good, for the times.
Interesting what you say about the C34: I very rarely see those around. It’s usually C35s and C33s. Perhaps they’re known to be crap cars, but then their Skyline opposite number, the R33, has a decent reputation and many of those are still about.
Great account – frameless windows and a B post? Is that a unique combination? Or will the Curbivores inform me otherwise?
Frameless windows + B-pillar = most Subarus until a few years ago!
I don’t think it is really that unique. In the ’70’s Ford in the US marketed their full size car as either a 4 door sedan (framed door windows, B pillar), 4 door hardtop (frameless door windows, no B pillar), or 4 door pillared hardtop (framless door windows, B pillar), as well as a 2 door (coupe?) and wagon. There has been debate about these definitions, so I’ll just leave it at that.
It was common in Japan in the ’80s/’90s. Subaru was a major proponent of the concept, but really every big automaker had a “pillared hardtop” in their JDM range back then.
Toyota, for example:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-asian/curbside-classic-1990-toyota-crown-s130-royal-saloon-3-0-hardtop-peak-crown/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-asian/cc-capsule-1993-toyota-corolla-ceres-ae101-jelly-bean-ricer/
Nissan (other than the Laurel):
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-asian/cc-capsule-1998-nissan-presea-r11-refina-l-losing-the-plot/
Or Honda / Acura:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-asian/curbside-classic-1992-1994-acura-vigor-the-closest-thing-to-a-real-four-door-hardtop/
This should have been the US Infiniti Q45
These are smaller in size than the same era Lexus ES or Acura TL’s, and not by an insignificant amount either.
Frameless windows and a b post just like Subaru’s always always had
Still see a few of these around too. A nice, original, low-km Club S model would be hard to turn down.
Stylish as they may (or not) be, these must have been absolutely cramped inside. That fast rear window looks like it gives the added bonus of terrible headroom, and the brochure shots don’t make legroom look all that inviting on first glance. On second glance, you realize that’s the impression with the front seats set at the front of their tracks, way up to the dash. Yikes…
That’s just how cars in that segment were: RWD and an inline six didn’t leave a lot of cabin space. If you did need more room, you either bought something FWD or stepped up to the Cedric/Gloria/Crown segment.
Mine wasn’t cramped inside (although my C34, C33 and R33 were). The seats aren’t all the way forward in the pic, they’re pretty close to where I had them, and I don’t hug the steering wheel 🙂 I’m 5’8 and could comfortably sit behind myself in the C35, which had basically the same dimensions as the C34 (and R33 sedan), but the seats (rear one especially) were much thicker and higher off the floor, so you sat much more upright, giving the appearance (and reality) of more room. The C35’s rear window did have quite the slope on it, but it didn’t impede headroom – although anyone over 6 feet tall might have found it an issue.
its like the old pre alloy jag XJ’s – its better to look at them as four door 2+2s since there is so little room in the back.
All in the name of style, and IMO worth it if you dont have have rear passengers too often 😉
Nissan missed the boat with the C34 styling (too much jellybean on the C33 silhouette), but the C35 is a nice looker and a under-the-radar (for now) alternative to the Toyota X100 triplets.
Scott beat me to it but these Laurels were quite popular in NZ but are disappearing fast the diesel engines are a popular swap into anything they fit for good fuel economy and the rest is Skyline parts, I still see the odd one driving around.