(first posted 1/17/2017) The similarities between the Torana and the Chevy Nova are plentiful. Both slotted in under larger models and yet they were not the smallest of their respective model ranges. Both had a history of performance editions, most of which were gone by the late 1970s. Both received handsome redesigns for the mid-1970s, and both were available in sedan, coupe and hatchback bodies. And both the Nova and Torana were axed in 1979 to make way for front-wheel-drive replacements.
The Torana story started in the 1960s like the Nova’s. General Motors-Holden had been receiving and assembling CKD kits of the Vauxhall Viva, as well as other foreign GM models like the Chevrolet Impala. GM-H decided to eliminate other GM brands from the Australian market, and so the Viva became a Holden Torana in 1967. There were few differences between the Holden and its Vauxhall counterpart but for a unique four-door variant introduced in 1968.
In 1969, GM-H introduced the LC series Torana. While it still utilized the existing HB floorpan, the wheelbase was extended for a new six-cylinder offering; four-cylinder models retained the old wheelbase length and front sheetmetal. The new styling was very reminiscent of the ‘big’ Holdens.
While there had been sporty Toranas before, things got more interesting with the launch of a GTR model and an even more exciting GTR XU-1. The latter had a tri-carb version of the Torana’s 186 cubic-inch six producing 160 hp, as well as a body kit featuring a spoiler, styled road wheels and graphics. The XU-1 had been built with the race track in mind and was homologated for series production racing at Bathurst. Later models received a larger 202 cubic-inch six with 190 hp.
In 1974, GM-H introduced a new Torana with crisp, almost European sheetmetal that resembled that of the new 1975 Chevrolet Nova. Like the Nova had been offering for years, GM-H added an optional V8 engine; the Torana could afford to move slightly upmarket thanks to the arrival of the new T-Car Gemini. The LH therefore saw an increase in dimensions, and featured a twin wishbone front suspension like the big Holdens and trailing arms and coil springs at the rear. It was still smaller than the US-market Nova – total length was almost 20 inches shorter at 177.5 inches, on a 10-inch shorter wheelbase – but then everything was always a bit bigger in the US.
What was rather American was the sheer variety of engines on offer. Base models came with an imported Opel 1900 four-cylinder, while optional engines ranged from 2.85 and 3.3 six-cylinder units to 4.2 and 5.0 V8 engines. However, most Toranas left the factory with six-cylinder engines under the hood; V8 models in non-performance trim were rare. The 5.0 V8 was worth the extra cost, though: output was 250 hp at 5,000 rpm and 320 ft-lbs at 3,400 rpm, hauling around a body weighing only around 2700 lbs. It could be selected in sporty SL/R 5000 trim; the SL/R package was also available with the 3.3 six and 4.2 V8.
In 1976, GM North America debuted the Pontiac Sunbird. The same year, GM-H copied the name and used it on the mildly-revised LX-series Torana, specifically the four-cylinder models; cars badged Torana were henceforth equipped only with six- or eight-cylinder engines.
Another name reused down under was Radial Tuned Suspension, as Holden recalibrated the springs and dampers of their models to make them handle better after a misguided dalliance with cushy suspension tuning; RTS was rolled out to the Sunbird range in ’76 and the Torana in ‘77. Front stabilizer bars, previously optional, were now standard on all models.
The SS trim line also appeared in Australia, used exclusively on the new Torana hatchback. This was basically the hatch equivalent of the sedan’s sporty SL/R trim, while both sedan and hatchback also came in a cheaper SL trim. However, the hatch’s more upscale positioning meant it did without the entry-level S model, column-mounted three-speed manual and the smaller of the two sixes. Instead, LX Torana hatches — including the SS — were available with either the 3.3 six (as seen in the featured car) or the two V8s. Like the Chevy Nova hatch, the Torana and Sunbird hatches could be purchased with a ‘Hatch-Hutch’ tent for camping.
Unique to the SL/R and SS Torana was this satin silver dash finish. All SS hatches, even those with the 3.3 six, received the SL/R 5000’s aggressive front spoiler. However, they did without that car’s extremely 1970s exterior graphics that spelt out ‘SL/R 5000’ in large, high-impact type.
The hatchback had been intended to launch with the 1974 LH series but had been delayed. A wagon was also planned, which would have been the Torana’s first offering of such a body style, but this never eventuated. Early prototypes of the hatchback show a more Vega-esque rear.
The LX was the most desirable Torana yet, thanks to the crisp styling, available hatchback, vastly improved handling courtesy of RTS, and available V8 engines. The A9X, another homologation special, was the ne plus ultra of Torana handling and performance. Fitted with a stronger rear axle, the Torana’s first use of rear disc brakes, and a hood scoop, the A9X package was available on both the SL/R 5000 sedan and the SS 5.0 hatch.
In 1978, GM-H launched the featured UC Torana and its Sunbird stablemate. Gone were the SS, A9X, SL-R and both V8 engines. Handling had been dramatically improved over 1976-77, remarkably with almost no penalty to ride quality, but now the power was being snuffed out.
The V8 had been a victim of efficiency—V8 models had required extensive structural revisions that added weight, and GM-H had wanted to make the Sunbird and Torana lighter and therefore more fuel efficient. Room also had to be made for the new 1978 VB Commodore, smaller than previous ‘big’ Holdens and available with six- and eight-cylinder engines.
In trying to more directly target the hot-selling four-cylinder Japanese mid-sizers, like the Toyota Corona, GM-H had alienated the enthusiasts. Despite having offered sporty Toranas and Sunbirds before, even without V8 engines, there was no factory sports trim in the UC series.
It got worse: the Opel 1900, itself no firecracker with 96 hp at 5200 rpm and 116 ft-lbs at 3600 rpm, was replaced shortly after the UC’s launch with the new 1.9 Starfire four. This was simply a Holden six cut down in size and mustered a measly 80 hp and 103 ft-lbs.
The sixes were much stouter—the 2.85 and 3.3 both produced around 100-120 hp, depending on the transmission and option code, while torque was in the 150-160 ft-lb range for the smaller engine and 185 ft-lbs for the 3.3. The extra $500-600 on top of the Sunbird’s price was arguably worth it.
GM-H’s rugged and simple products of the 1970s are easily modified and although the ranks are thinning, the roads used to be littered with modified Toranas and Geminis. This could possibly have started out as a sluggish Sunbird, with the anemic Starfire ripped out and bigger wheels fitted as often happened with Chevy Novas back in the day. By the time of the UC, Holden didn’t bother to visually differentiate their four- and six-cylinder models other than badging.
Here’s an unmodified UC, a Torana SL hatchback with the 3.3 six. Underscoring the increasing importance of the mid-size four-cylinder segment in Australia, only the four-cylinder Sunbird was available in posh SL/E trim during the UC’s run. A DeLuxe option package was offered for the Torana SL sedan, however, offering full instrumentation, front and rear bumper over-riders and tinted windows.
The standard transmission in all Sunbirds and the Torana SL was a four-speed manual sourced from the Philippines. The base Torana S featured a column-mounted three-speed manual and a front bench seat. Holden’s three-speed Tri-Matic auto was optional on all models—column-shifted on the Torana S, console-mounted on the others.
The Torana had been thoroughly redesigned for 1974 and yet in 1979, it was axed; the Sunbird followed the year after. By Australian standards, this was a relatively short production run for a platform. But GM-H had considered extending the production run of the platform and continuing the Torana/Sunbird line on into the 1980s.
As I mentioned in my article on the WB Statesman, Holden was in a state of flux in the late 1970s. GM-H executives were weighing up their options for the 1980s—embrace proven, old platforms, or bet the farm on smaller, more modern, European platforms? The fuel crises of the 1970s undoubtedly persuaded GM-H to follow the option that resulted in the most economical vehicles.
GM-H did produce mock-ups of a Torana-based five-door hatchback codenamed the ‘VA’. This didn’t appear to progress beyond the clay model stage. As you can see, its styling is rather ungainly, as though a Citation roofline was planted on a Torana body.
Despite rear-wheel-drive proportions, the side view is scarcely easier on the eyes.
The VA plan was rejected in favor of the first Commodore, which was met with commercial success. Holden engineered another revision of the Torana/Sunbird, known as the UD, but it was stillborn, perhaps due to concerns about cannibalization of the new Commodore. The Commodore was only around 10 inches longer than the Torana and less than inch wider, after all, so such fears were valid.
Holden added the Starfire four to the 1980 VC facelift of their Commodore to serve as somewhat of an interim replacement for the Sunbird, despite its much higher price. The real replacement for the Torana/Sunbird came in 1982 with Holden’s version of the GM J-Car, the Camira. With efficient FWD packaging and modern styling, not to mention class-leading handling, the Camira was a fitting replacement (although tarnished by some quality issues and a weak engine at launch). Alas, the Camira never attained the enthusiast following of the Torana. Never underestimate the desirability of a V8 engine option and simple rear-wheel-drive mechanicals. That’s the reason why so many Toranas, Sunbirds and Chevy Novas went on to become the prized possessions of hoons.
Related Reading:
Carshow Classic: 1964 Vauxhall Viva HA Saloon – Viva Vauxhall?
Car Show Classic: 1978 Vauxhall Cavalier Sportshatch
Curbside Classic: 1978-81 Holden VB/VC Commodore – The Beginning of a New Era
After the FE/FC, HK, HQ and VE, the LH/LX are the best looking Holdens ever made. Hehehe
Good read.
You’re right about non-SL/R V8s being rare. Despite living in inner-suburban Melbourne during those years, I only ever saw one, an SL sedan with the 4.2 V8. Cars that size didn’t need V8s.
So since the V8 was effectively only for racing or the boy racers, I have to wonder how much effort was wasted making this bodyshell heavy and strong enough to take the torque of the V8s? I know several folk who have ripped out that abortion of a four-cylinder engine and put a six in their Sunbirds, with a Toyota five speed behind to calm the sixes’ breathless scream at highway speeds. Cramped in the back and noisy, but ‘built like a brick dunny’, as we say down under.
I tend to hear “built like a brick shithouse” a lot more. Dunny is one of those Alf Stewart words that seems to be dying out. Or maybe it’s more spoken in regional areas nowadays?
I was being polite to our host. 🙂
Regional language is different, especially when you’re the local minister! Dunny is/was acceptable in regional polite society (central-west Victoria). Some of it, anyway.
Good article. Are the horsepower numbers you quote gross or net? The Opel 1.9, even in fi form, was much weaker in the USA.
According to my source for those figures (60 Years of Holden by Terry Bebbington), those are the figures included in promotional/technical material by Holden at the time. So if we are talking mid-1970s onwards, those would be net figures.
I thought Australia mostly used SAE gross figures until metricization? The figures for the LC/LJ/LH I’m pretty sure are gross.
The most common version of the 1,897cc Opel CIH version, with 9.0 compression, had only 90 PS DIN even in Germany, with no emissions controls. There was a less common high-compression version that had 96 hp (97 PS) DIN, but it had 9.8:1 and took super premium fuel, which I’m guessing is not the version that went into the Torana.
If gross, it emphasizes how weak the cut down Australia 1.9 four was. When the iron duke arrived in the superthrift 4’s place in the USA line up, the fact that the net horsepower number (85) was so much higher than the older engines 90hp gross number showed the work done to meet emissions and keep the heavy cars moving. Without weight and emission pressures a simple cutdown was (almost) good enough in Australia.
The Starfire four was probably net and the Opel four gross. Cars went metric in Australia in 1974 according to Wikkipedia.
Australia had U.S.-style emissions standards by 1976 — ADR27A, which included NOx limits — which is why the Starfire Four was so anemic. I have a Motor Manual with a test of a 1980 VC Commodore with that engine, and they needed 18 seconds to hit 100 km/h (62 mph)!
Just as happened in the US, the change to net figures happened at the same time as ‘proper’ emissions controls (there were some earlier), in 1976 AFAIK. Power output numbers took one big hit that exaggerated the actual change.
Nova? The white coupe in the article looks more like a bloated 1975 Vega. 😛
My thought exactly – i did a double take when the pic first came up!
Exactly. Looking at the resting the line, it helps me visualize what a four-door Vega might have looked like, had GM chosen to go down that path.
Vega connection was my first thought as well.
There is a striking resemblance, especially in side profile. If I follow correctly, the basic styling of this generation of Torana debuted in 1974, so the Vega may have been an influence (an internal influence, since they were both GM products). The Torana was bigger than the Vega, though, and its history and position in Holden’s lineup was probably more comparable to the that of the Nova in Chevrolet’s lineup.
Very enjoyable read that plugged some of the knowledge gaps I still have about Australian cars in general and Holdens in particular. That five-door is totally the Chevy Citation’s evil RWD twin — a stillborn one, though. Interiors seems a lot more attractive than the Novas, too.
Ad copy: “Computer developed 4-cylinder engine.” — Must be infallible, then.
As author Henry Petroski pointed out, the Hartford Civic Center roof was designed using software & it collapsed in 1978 because of an unanticipated failure mode.
Wasn’t Mopar’s 2.7 V6 developed the same way ?
I have little doubt it was, but it wasn’t worth crowing about. What computers did (and do) is reduce development time & costs since modeling can catch many problems before any prototypes are machined. As history shows, one can still develop good engines w/o them, but it’ll just cost more.
Can’t think what they needed the computer for. When news of the forthcoming four leaked out, Holden tried to put a positive spin on it. Wheels ran a cover with a picture of the cut-down engine and a blue-singleted bloke with an axe over his shoulder, and the caption “Must we do it the ocker way?”. I never took the engine seriously after that inspired piece of cover art.
I drove a couple of Starfire rentals they went ok and handled better than the six with a lot less weight up front the automatics were tedious but the manual four speed got along ok I had one with four adults aboard past 160 kmh along the southern motorway in Auckland, the slow revving six wasnt any powerhouse I owned a 202 UC for a couple of years it went for scrap the day I got my EH registered.
The cars actually look nice for the era they were in. The mono colored bumpers brings a newer more modern look to these 70’s cars. Amazing with paint and accent strips can do to a car to make it appear more “Sport” like.
The Decals also does wonders to the 70’s cars.
What a great article and me too first thought Vega on snap impression…then Cavalier, sadly
Why every time i see a picture of parked cars in australia there is clubs on steering wheels?is stealing cars so common over there?
In urban areas, yes.
You may be seeing them on older cars without the in built anti-theft devices that modern cars have, owners probably think they have at least a visual deterent. Club locks were very popular here back in the day.
Certain models of old cars are highly sought after by thieves and many Torana model are no exception. Of course they very easy to steal and steering lock device is a visible deterrent to most.
Plus a Club also doubles as a perfectly legal weapon to carry around in your car.
The 2-dr looks pretty much like a Vega to me.
I have to crack up at the propaganda Holden supplied the engines to the otherwise Opel bodies the smaller Viva type Torana is simply that a Viva the six cylinder version of the same car was also built in Korea by Daewoo as the Chevrolet 1700 and in wagon too several are alive and well in NZ, The later LH/X/ UC was an Opel centre section supplied to all GM assembly and car building operations world wide who then provided their own running gear and front and rear facias the Vauxhall Opel Holden and Chevrolet versions all differ but are all the same structure NZ has the fortunate position in getting its cars imported from everywhere so we get to see most versions not just the Aussie version that is on the Aussie market.
?? What propaganda are you referring to? Your comment is a little stream of consciousness. Or maybe I just need my morning coffee…
Bryce has always been a bit loose with facts and reality, I have learnt to ignore most of his babblings.
There is almost no Australian design content in the Viva/Opel Torana its just a mix n match of existing parts the fourdoor car is not an Australian design at all, as I pointed out but Aussies refuse to acknowledge the same car but in wagon form was in production in Korea by Daewoo slicing of the wagon apendage is all GMH did, they even kept the 1700cc engine for the upmarket four banger model.
The 74 redesign was because of a change of Opel base body and the LH and LX share very little with the UC the rear suspension pickup points were completely changed due to the different floorpan which began life in the UK Victor cars, one of the main reasons handling improved, it was almost a completely different car which you would discover if like I did with mine you tried to find replacement rear suspension parts nothing from the earlier models fits,
It is quite intrigueing just how GMH came up with its various models but of course Australia doesnt have the other cars that formed the parts kits, so they are easily passed off as Australian designs.
The different floor pan was to give clearance for the Salisbury over the banjo rear axles. Nothing to do with Vauxhall.
And that axle and floor pressing set up was sourced from……………..
The LX/LX/UC bodyshell was a Holden design, independent of Opel. As for the earlier Commodores, that was certainly an example where the Opel (Rekord) centre structure was used.
Not sure where Bryce got his info, but you don’t see the main body section of the LH in ANY Opel or Vauxhall. The 1974 Rekord has something different, as does the Vauxhall Victor.
The Commodore was apparently going to be the direct replacement for the Torana originally. The product planning department had a loose outline of Holden’s range pre oil crises that was planned for about 1980.
It ran a bit like this- the T car Gemini would be the entry level Holden and run into the early 1980s.
The Torana would die about 1979 and be replaced by the V car Commodore.
The Kingswood range would be completely rebodied as the WA series, with four door sedans, wagons as well as a ute and panel van about 1980.
The Statesman range would also be completely rebodied as the WB series and debut about a year later.
The 4.2 V8 would be the volume selling motor in the Commodore range as well as the WA range, with the red motor six being replaced in the late 1970s.
With the oil shock and financial instability through the 1970s planners could not decide on what to do with the WA and it ended up a mild face lift, then abandoned.
The WB Statesman was a bigger facelift but not the radical rebody first anticipated.
The Commodore ended up replacing the Kingswood/WA, and the inadequate J body Camira eventually replaced the Torana instead.
The red motor was never effectively replaced by a Holden design, instead when ULP petrol came in 1986 a Nissan six was brought in as a stop gap before the ubiquitous Buick V6 became available.
This was a very optimistic scenario even before the oil shock, but who knows what might have been!
‘Lotus-inspired’ WA. If only…
UC Toranas, VB Commodores, Kingswoods, Statesmans, and Isuzu Geminis were all in production at the same time until GMH figured out their market, they redesigned the red six for better power and economy resulting in the blue engines and did away with the Torana and eventually the outdated Gemini and the larger Kingswood bodies, resulting in Ford taking all the taxi fleet sales with their marginally bigger but much bigger looking Falcon,
Holden’s problem was that they made the LH/LX/UC bodyshell too close to the Kingswood in size. This may have been an over-reaction to the skinny and cramped LC/LJ. Two bodies less than a foot apart in length? The Commodore kind of fitted into the non-existent gap between the two; no wonder it wound up replacing both.
The waters are kind of muddied here by Holden adopting more prominent bumpers (never a legal requirement here) during the big Holdens’ production run, which added three inches to the length. The first Commodore was only two inches shorter than the small-bumpered HQ Kingswood, but six inches narrower. No wonder Holden’s product planners had problems!
Oh, and the 4.2? No way was the 4.2 going to be the volume selling motor, even before the various fuel crises. Aussies liked V8s, sure, if somebody else paid for the fuel. We bought sixes. Rightly or wrongly, V8s were equated with thirst. Holden had erred in assuming we’d buy a small V8 instead of a big six. And apart from the XU1, Holden didn’t develop the six once it reached 202 inches, assuming folk would spring for the 253/4.2. What folk did spring for was the local Ford dealer, where sixes were accepted as the mainstream engine and actually developed over the years rather than just patched up to comply with 1976’s pollution requirements which made the already breathless Holden 202 a thoroughly unpleasant lump.
Great article William, and a car very close to my heart.
I had a LX SL hatch as my first car, and had many adventures with it over the next 13 years and 140 000 km (probably a COAL in there, I think). Some time in there I added a LH SL/R 5000 L34 to the stable, and I’ll have had it for 20 years this November…
I’m amazed that you found a photo of a very tidy looking SS hatch in the wild – nowadays the only place I see cars like that are at shows! And a very balanced take on the UC, a car that the majority of Torana fans tend to dislike pretty strongly, most likely due to the complete lack of a performance version. Having said that, there was a fair bit of publicity given to a semi-official turbo kit for the venerable 202 that was available through dealers, which boosted performance to near-A9X levels, according to period reports that I’ve read.
I’m sure I could go on for ages and bore the non-Aussies to death, but I’d just like to call you out on that last line – we Torana enthusiasts are not all hoons you know! 😉
1972 Chevrolet 1700 by Daewoo This uses the Opel Vauxhall foordoor body and Opel front sheetmetal, there was a purple one for sale on NZs trademe recently
If Chevy and Holden had done some platform sharing and brought this over as the Vega replacement, seems they could have had a real winner on their hands. Of course NIH ruled back then, so no way.
The LX is quite an attractive car, but one wonders if there was a photo of a ’70 Opel Ascona tacked to the wall of the design studio? The hatchback roofline is quite different, but the sedan and especially the nose treatment are damn close. If you’re going to copy a design, it’s a good one, but…
Also that hatchback UD concept looks almost exactly like an Isuzu I-Mark hatchback (which was, of course, a platform mate of the Gemini, so maybe that’s not a surprise).