When General Motors-Holden axed the WB Statesman and Caprice in 1984, they effectively handed the segment to Ford and its Fairlane and LTD twins. That left the Commodore was their largest sedan but, while the car was stretched longer and longer as it evolved from VB to VL, it was never widened. That would change with the ’88 VN series, which also led to the resurrection of the Statesman and Caprice names for a new flagship line.
A healthy three inches wider, the VN Commodore was an amalgam of the existing Commodore platform and the Opel Omega A. Holden had bet the farm on the smaller Commodore which, with fuel prices at their peak in the late 1970s, seemed like a cracker idea. Then fuel prices fell and the big Ford Falcon’s sales shot up, overtaking the Commodore. To add insult to injury, Holden had not only ceded the luxury sedan segment to Ford, it had also given them the ute segment when they axed the WB-series Utility in 1984.
The full-size, Australian luxury sedan was the car of choice for limousine companies, Prime Ministers and staunch traditionalists who wouldn’t dare buy a more expensive, less powerful German car. While the Commodore-based Calais offered the plush trim and amenities expected by those buyers, it was considerably smaller than the big Fairlane and LTD.
VQ Statesman
In 1990, Holden roared back into the ute and full-size luxury sedan segments with the VG Utility and the VQ Statesman and Caprice. The VQ cars were the first Aussie-built cars to feature an independent rear suspension, something later introduced to the Commodore line with the ’91 VP series. The semi-trailing arm and coil spring rear suspension was loosely derived from that of the Opel Omega and Senator; unlike the Opels, the Commodore would retain a live rear axle. Statesmans used Monroe shocks and a 16mm stabilizer bar at the rear, while Caprices had Bilstein gas shocks and a 15mm bar.
VQ Caprice with aftermarket wheels
Statesman and Caprice used the same 111.25 inch wheelbase as the Commodore wagon, four inches longer than that of the sedan, and engineers widened the track by just over an inch. Although the Commodore’s V6 was later offered in the Statesman, the VQs were initially available only with the fuel-injected 5.0 Holden V8 with 221 hp and 283 ft-lbs. Despite a curb weight of around 3500 lbs, the V8 still allowed the VQs to reach 60 mph in around 9 seconds. The only transmission was the smooth-shifting Turbo-Hydramatic 700 four-speed automatic.
The Statesman and Caprice were recognizably different from the Commodore due to their longer bodies and unique roofline. However, there was still a strong and perhaps uncomfortable familial resemblance, Holden using the same headlights, taillights, door skins, hood, and front fenders. The Caprice did receive a fetching waterfall grille, however, as well as some nicer wheels. More cosmetic changes had been planned during development but were nixed due to Holden’s perilous financial situation during the 1980s. When the VN Commodore was launched and sales took off, Holden suddenly had more funds available for the VQ twins but it was too late to make any significant exterior changes. It would take until the 1994 VR series for the Statesman and Caprice to once again have a truly unique appearance.
A VQ Caprice with what looks like late-2000s HSV wheels
The Statesman and Caprice were rather subdued in appearance, more so than the often imposing and American-inspired long-wheelbase Holdens of yore. North Americans, however, might have noticed a strong similarity between the VQ’s roofline and that of some their local GM products: the Saturn SL and Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme.
Statesman (left) and Caprice (right) interiors
Then there was the interior, which was far too close to that of the Commodore. There was nicer cloth upholstery and more features, of course, but the dashboard design was the same. At least the Caprice spruced things up with some real black bean wood trim on the dash, steering wheel, and door panels as well as a choice of velour or leather trim. There were some puzzling omissions for a luxury model though, including the lack of steering wheel height and reach adjustment and power-assisted front seats. The Caprice countered, however, with luxury touches like roof-mounted rear cabin audio controls with headphones.
Holden and Ford had both released dramatically overhauled large cars in 1988 and both had immediately been criticized for quality control issues. Even the more expensive Statesman and Caprice suffered from build quality issues and a rather creaky structure, and body twist and movement was exacerbated by the extra length of these models. It would take both Ford and Holden until 1992-93 to get those issues under control.
While the Statesman/Caprice and Fairlane/LTD all lacked the polish of Japanese luxury sedans, the Holden duo were widely regarded as dynamically superior to the Fords. Additionally, Holden offered a V8 while the Fairlane/LTD were initially I6-only, Ford having dropped their V8 engine in the 1980s only to bring it back in 1991. Where the Fords held the upper hand was in sheer space, measuring 1.73 inches wider and 3.74 inches longer in the wheelbase. The Holdens still had superior rear legroom, however.
The Caprice had a much nicer cabin than the Statesman, even if the Commodore resemblance remained strong, and also had a marginally softer ride due to different rear dampers and a fractionally smaller rear stabilizer bar. You paid for the extra luxury, however, as the Caprice fell afoul of the Luxury Car Tax and cost a staggering $AUD17,000 more than the Statesman and $4k more than a Ford LTD. For its $56k price tag, you could have bought both a Statesman and a Toyota Corolla. Only around 15% of VQ buyers chose the Caprice.
Those seeking more power and exclusivity could purchase the first long-wheelbase luxury sedans to be tuned by Holden’s fledgling performance outfit, Holden Special Vehicles (HSV).
HSV produced 135 Statesman SV90s between 1990 and 1991, followed by 50 Statesman 5000i sedans between 1991 and 1992. Both used a more powerful version of the Holden V8 with 241 hp as well as a firmer suspension tune and various cosmetic tweaks.
A Series II revision arrived in December 1991, coinciding with the revised VP Commodore’s launch and including its minor suspension tweaks and the VP Calais’ speed-sensitive power steering. HSV offered two versions of the VQ II, the SV93 and the 268 hp Statesman 5000i. Most importantly, anti-lock brakes were finally available as an option on the Statesman and fitted as standard to the Caprice. The Statesman now had the Commodore’s 3.8 V6 as a credit option along with a rare column-shift/front bench option. Another new option was an electronically-controlled, self-levelling rear suspension. The Caprice also finally had power-adjustable front seats and ditched the standard velour trim for leather. It was the 1990s now, after all.
Only the Fairlane and LTD came close to the VQ twins in terms of luxury appointments, power and sheer size. These domestic luxury sedans were in a class of their own, equivalently sized and powered Japanese and European imports costing tens of thousands more. Those more expensive sedans may have often been better built and more refined but the VQ twins were well-suited to Australian conditions with plenty of low-end torque and a comfortable ride.
Ford ultimately had the upper hand, though, even if they had the inferior product. They’d had the segment to themselves for several years and had loyal buyers. The Fairlane and LTD also looked very different to the Falcon they were derived from. Those two factors were enough to ensure the Fords remained dominant. In 1991 and 1993, Ford shifted just over double the number of Fairlanes as Holden did Statesmans; the divide was less marked between the LTD and the Caprice but the market still favored the Ford. It would take until the 1994 VR for Holden to threaten the Ford, the two arch rivals neck-and-neck in sales through the rest of the decade.
The real threat to the Statesman and Caprice wasn’t the Ford, however. Sure, both the Ford and Holden twins had a few good years left in the 1990s and early 2000s but after that, sales winnowed away. The market had opened up, tariffs had disappeared, and the cachet of German nameplates proved increasingly alluring. Once a status symbol among Australian executives, the Statesman/Caprice and Fairlane/LTD lost relevance with private buyers.
In the early 1990s, when a full-size Australian luxury sedan meant you had made it, the Statesman and Caprice struggled. If the Commodore hadn’t existed, the VQ twins would have looked rather appealing. Alas, there was a Commodore, it was several thousand dollars cheaper, and it looked the same inside and out except for a different roofline. The VQ was therefore a beachhead. Holden’s real attack would come with the VR.
VQ Statesman photographed in Virginia, Brisbane, QLD. VQ Caprices photographed in the Brisbane CBD and the Melbourne CBD.
Related Reading:
Curbside Classic: 1980-85 Statesman WB by General Motors-Holden – What a Beaut
Curbside Classic: 1994-95 Holden VR Caprice – Broughams Down Under
Curbside Classic: 1988-91 Holden VN Commodore – Revisiting the Opel Mine
Curbside Classic: 1988-95 Australian Ford Fairlane/LTD – Identifying The Common Lincs
cue americans comment like “its an oldsmobile right ? or – i see a saturn back end
Personally i see a Chevrolet Beretta – and i quite like these holdens because they don’t look like aussie cars……..
Very good article, William.
I couldn’t take these seriously when they were new. They resembled something like the upscale display house in an outer-suburban estate (or tract development), some obviously fake repro. They screamed poor taste. And the interiors were simply execrable, kids plastic with third world gaps everywhere. With added wood for that fully false effect. If it stayed glued there, that is, for a high-quality product they were not.
They had the VN Commodores awful over-assisted too-sharp steering, but the long wheelbase and independent rear did make them feel a great deal stabler. Much better ride, too. Like the flimsy VN, they also proved, contrarily, to be very tough customers.
And in their day, boy, did they go!
These old Commodores are getting quite rare in NZ, most of the survivors have been thrashed to within microns of their lives and are now on their last legs, the luxury upscale versions havent escaped that treatment either, There was local assembly during this era and in addition to the common Australian spec cars local oddities were also factory built including a 2.0L four using a Vectra engine and V6 &V8 GTS models, They went ok for what they were back then. Becoming collectors items now.
That configuration of the VN Commodore and Caprice have more Opel cues than the Opel Senator itself. However the tail lights look too humble, the Daewoo Brougham Super Salon has the tail lights the Caprice should have.
The tail lights are shared with the Commodore as you can see in the photo posted by Bryce above. Unless you really wanted vast rear legroom, the Calais was just as good and cheaper.
Holden’s financial issues were bad – they were bailed out by GM to the tune of $750m, otherwise they would have had to shut down. No wonder they had to economise.
A classmate sometimes drove his father’s Statesman to school, he also apparently had it up to 220km/h (137 mph) on the two-lane highway out of town, so they could go even allowing for speedo error. I don’t remember many around our country town but Fairlanes were popular.
Nice article William, although there were some earlier cars built with irs, just not Holdens. This era also saw more civilized and city friendly 4wds emerge such as the Mitsubishi Pajero V6, as well as new Patrol and LandCruiser, that I’m sure took buyers. The cheap M-B/BMWs were still a bit stingy in equipment and underpowered in 1990-91, but they would soon improve.
I love your features from a corner of the world different than my own.
This car looks to me like a first-gen Mercury Sable as if styled by GM.
“This car looks to me like a first-gen Mercury Sable as if styled by GM.”
This was my exact thought, Joe. The C pillar area and the flat top of the rear wheel opening make the car look like a Sable design as copied by a high school design class. These things work on the Sable but don’t really work here.
Yes, I do see Mercury Sable in the roofline, along with the wheel arches from the 1992 Buick Skylark in the VQ’s styling.
Having seen exactly one early Mercury sable in my life except for the fishfaced Taurus that was sable front sheet metal here its not a comparism that most people here can make, these began life as what you call a Catera a nip here and a tuck there mount it on a floor pan a size too small then stretch it slightly and thats what your looking at, the independant rear end the big Opel?Vauxhall cars had couldnt be used as nobody ever tried it behind a 5.0L V8 much less on Australias less than smooth road net work,
This is the era of the Lotus Carlton road rockets they imported the gearboxes and rear axles for those from GMH’s V8 parts bin all the way to Europe and didnt send any cars back.
Some time ago someone here (?) pointed out that the Saturn/Cutlass Supreme roof resembled the ’59 GM four-door hardtop/’60 Corvair sedan “flattop”
I see a lot of the Cadillac Catera in these, but really that is not surprise as they were thinly reworked Opel Omega B models, almost the same as these.
As much as the brands mean to their local country of origin, I really have to wonder if GM got full benefit out of having Holden, Vauxhall, and Opel as separate companies. To an outsider like me (as I have limited exposure to them from my US perspective), it really seemed more like the BOP trio of the 50’s, and ended up with more badge engineering than specific market development and identity, much like Buick, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac did in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. By the time we hit the 2000s, the US brands died, while the EU/Australian versions just soldiered on, becoming more shared amongst each other (and the US, as Cadillacs, Buicks, and Pontiacs) rather than being laser focused on their home markets.
William, you write up beautiful articles detailing the hits and misses of the Australian brands. Thanks for helping me understand a bit more about the history of these cars we seldom hear about over here in the US.
The badge engineering worked just fine because Australia never got any big Vauxhalls or Opels these cars were claimed as All Australian, Originals in Vauxhall and Opel are still on the roads in NZ though in much smaller numbers than the rapidly fading Commodores, the similarities are obvious.
Ha ha… I worked for a car rental company back in the nineties and we had several VR Statesman models in our fleet. More often than not we would brief our customers where the basic controls were in any given model. I happened to mention to one of them that the vehicle in question happened to have an airbag…”Great”! they said..”Where is the button for that”?
Those seats in gray cloth look super comfy. I like the looks for the most part. I’m amazed at how much greenhouse there is and how it must have had outstanding 360 visibility.
Sorry – but to me, it seems that GM was rather lost when Ford unveiled their aerodynamic sedans and were only treading water, waiting for sales to materialize as they had in the past. GM was spoiled by success for so long that they really hadn’t considered any other competition than through their own race towards increased manufacturing cost reductions. The GM gangs chased their bottom lines, and failed to look over their shoulders.
Their vehicle’s designs look cheap. All I kept seeing from GM after 1980 were cars and trucks that looked disposable and assembled as inexpensively as possible. How suprised can one be when they inevitably let you down? Their interiors were subpar compared to the competition, and their fit and finish was often iffy. As an owner, I never cared if GM made a profit. My focus was on trying to keep headliners from falling on my head, plastics from warping, discoloring and snapping, and wheels on the road.
These were indeed nice looking cars, that is, if one just needed a set of wheel for a year or two. Trouble was, these cars just didn’t last. The survivors are often shabby in appearance, and rare. The engines were solid, but little else was.
So, I see that Australia wasn’t spared this GM era of mediocrity. I have often wondered, did GM decision makers drive these cars and what did they really think of them? Were these folks actually recommending their products to family and friends? How could a car company do so many things so well for so long, and then suddenly lose its ability to make a car as good as it used to?
Ford comes off as too conservative, but it seems that there is a point to evolving a design, rather than completely replacing one, right?
We has Austriloan morn Capacise in Saudi Arbia, they easily set you back and pull hard to well-loved 200 kph, 120mph, probably topping out st 150mph. These were our company car for Saudi Aramco, the National Oil Company, no smog to speak of, pure performance out the door.
At the risk of sounding like Justy Revisited (would that be a bad thing?), when these were new I couldn’t take them seriously either. They were all too obviously a stretched new Commodore, which in turn was a stretched Opel with an old Buick six. Even used the same taillights!
Coming after the lovely VL Commodore with that smooth Nissan RB30 six, the VN Commodore was a letdown. Bigger, sure, but then we knew it had to be to have a hope of catching Falcon sales. But there was a certain air of Eau de Costcutter about it, like that plasticky interior. And this Statesman: sure it had a big back seat, but unless you noticed the longer Oldsmobile roofline, it looked just like the neighbour’s Commodore at a glance. Say what you will about the Fairlane/LTD (I reckon they were ugly), but there was no mistaking it for a Falcon.
That V8 sounded nice though. Someone in town bought a Statesman new, and I thought the exhaust note rather out of keeping for a luxury car. Or maybe it was the speed he drove it…
For accuracy may I contribute a minor correction:
“The VQ cars were the first Aussie-built cars to feature an independent rear suspension,”
This above erroneous claim is oft repeated into supposed fact. However there are plenty of “Aussie-built cars” featuring IRS which comfortably preceded the VQ Holden.
These include apparently forgotten Australian-unique vehicles dating back 30 years previous to said GM-Holden. There are also quite a few other similarly foreign-owned Marques that nevertheless included a significant (majority) level of local build-content.
For one example, it’s no secret the VW Beetle achieved 95% local content!
Yet with its imported gearbox, V6 crankshaft and numerous else, I’d doubt GM-H’s VQ can lay claim to that figure.
Btw a large number of the Australian-manufactured BMCA models can be added to this list – if hydrolastic suspension is considered (?) to be an IRS system.
It looks like a stretched Ford Tempo with a fake grill glued on.