(first posted 10/26/2016, revised in October 2022) The Citroën 15-Six, colloquially known as the “Quinze” in its native land, was the apex of the automaker’s car range for 18 years, with remarkably few changes. It was the last French-made straight-six and also the first car to feature the famous hydropneumatic suspension. But first, let’s look at Citroën’s context and the Traction Avant range in a bit more depth…
Getting Traction: André Citroën’s Testament Car
The background of the Traction Avant’s birth is one of total chaos. The story begins in early 1933. André Citroën just had the main Javel factory completely re-built, even as car sales plunged due to the Depression. The RWD “Rosalie” range was not selling very well and the creditors were panicking, but Citroën was a betting man. Having just driven the new front-drive Adler Trumpf in Germany, he wagered everything on a completely new car, which was rushed to production in a little over a year.
The new car would be a cocktail of the most cutting-edge technology, one-upping the Trumpf and every other car besides: hydraulic brakes, unit body construction, no running boards, torsion bar suspension, brand new OHV engine driving the front wheels, automatic gearbox – all packaged into a beautifully-proportioned, aerodynamic (for 1934) low-slung shape authored by Flaminio Bertoni, who oversaw all Citroën designs between the Rosalie and the Ami 6.
That was the plan – Citroën’s high-stakes bet. And he almost pulled it off. At the last minute, the troublesome automatic gearbox was nixed and a traditional 3-speed was designed to replace it in three weeks. The Traction quickly entered production, hitting the dealerships in April 1934 and soon evolved into two main ranges – the smaller 7 and the larger 11 – complete with two-door convertible and coupé varieties, as well as LWB limousines.
These early cars had numerous flaws: UV joints would fail, unit bodies were too weak, suspensions too fragile, engine mounts inadequate, etc. Sales quickly nose-dived after the initial summer boom; the many repairs under warranty and constant production changes were further sinking Citroën’s treasury. To top it all, they had stopped producing the Rosalie, thereby leaving those customers who were weary of the new car unable to order anything more traditional.
André Citroën thought he still had an ace up his sleeve: the V8-powered “22”. He ordered the car in pre-production, added it to the brochures and put a few on display at both the Paris and Brussels Auto Shows in October and December 1934. With its 100 hp V8 made from two 11 CV blocks, the 22 was purported to reach speeds of 140 kph (85 mph) “in complete safety”.
A few prototype saloons, and at least one limousine, one roadster and one coupé were photographed in 1934 with their distinctive double bumpers, faired headlights and bespoke grille. They have all since vanished – not a single 22 has been seen in several decades, despite a considerable amount of sleuthing from scores of diligent Tractionnistes in France and abroad.
On December 21, 1934, the company was officially declared bankrupt. Michelin, Citroën’s tyre supplier and one of their many concerned investors, did a deal with the main creditors, banks Paribas and Lazare, and gained control of the carmaker in January 1935. André Citroën was already very ill by that time; he died of stomach cancer six months later.
Citroën designed the Traction Avant as three cars. The first was a small body shell for the base 7 range and the performance-oriented 11 Légère. The second was a larger and wider body for the family-minded customer (11 Normale). Though similar-looking, their body panels, width, grilles and roof pressings were all different. Only the front doors were shared across all Traction variants. Both the small and large cars came in saloon and two-door (coupé and roadster) variants. The third member of the species was the six-light Longue body shell, initially used for the 11 and 22 LWB six-seater Limousine and nine-seater Familiale.
Early Longues had symmetrical front and rear door openings that looked nice but undermined the body’s structural strength, which always remained inferior to the other two body shells. Not a few LWB Tractions simply broke in half at the B-pillar, even though the Normale‘s rear doors were eventually used to provide a little extra rigidity. Like the aborted 22, the 15-Six would only be available on the Normale and Longue bodies.
Turning Lemons Into Lemonade
Soon after Michelin took over, the V8 programme was simply cancelled – it had been launched way before it would be ready for production, yet again. Getting the 22 sorted would have diverted focus from the 4-cyl. cars, which also needed a lot of urgent attention but were showing promise.
Thanks to countless mechanical, structural and production fixes, by late 1936 Citroëns were solid and dependable cars again, but with far better handling and safety than virtually anything on the road. Michelin instilled its penny-pinching conservative values in the Traction, which lost some of its brightwork, made do with only one tail light and fewer paint options. Reintroducing the RWD range (with ‘reversed’ Traction OHV engines) also helped the bottom line.
When the RWD range was pensioned off for good after 1937, the 11 Commerciale utility wagon, based on the Longue, was launched to try to convert French small businesses and rural folk to the wonders of FWD. This version, like all Longues, was dropped from the range during the war, but it famously reappeared with a genuine hatchback rear door for an encore in 1954-57.
Now that the Traction had been sorted out, Pierre Boulanger (“Michelin’s man” at the helm of Citroën) could turn his attention to making the front-drive subcompact TPV (Toute Petite Voiture, the 2 CV) and also revisit André Citroën’s original idea: a range-topping luxury model, but not a V8. Something that would work.
Six please, we’re French
The cancellation of the 22 did leave a gap at the top, but the V8 had proven heavy, thirsty and less than brilliant. So a straight-six was programmed instead. Because the last 6-cyl. Citroën, the RWD Rosalie, had been called 15 CV, Citroën decided to keep the numeral, calling the new car 15-Six. However, the car’s fiscal rating was 16 CV, as the Traction’s 6-cyl. was a bit bigger than its ancestor’s unrelated engine.
The new 2.9 litre 6-cyl. was basically the 11’s 4-cyl. with a two extra cylinders. This called for a noticeably longer nose than the 11, though tooling costs were kept under control by using the 11’s front wings and headlights. The 15-Six was a heavier car, with velours seats and a bit more chrome. It could reach over 80mph, though at those speeds, it would gobble about 20 litres of petrol every 100km (12 mpg).
The first batch of cars, all black saloons, were sold to selected clients and field-tested by Citroën or Michelin executives in May-June 1938. The 15-Six was officially launched in October 1938, at what turned out to be the last Paris Auto Show before the war, but only as a saloon; the Limousine and Familiale versions (below) were introduced in March 1939.
Tractions from this era used these attractive Michelin Pilote wheels. The Six’s Pilotes were cream-coloured (the 11 Normale / Longue had red ones and the 7 / 11 Légère’s were bright yellow). The 15-Six’s grille was then painted black and its headlights were fully chromed. Also, the 15-Six sported louvres on its hood from the start – this was only adopted by the 11 in 1946.
Had the 1939 Paris Auto Show taken place, Citroën would have probably introduced the 15-Six roadster. As such, only about three were made in late 1939 and perhaps a couple more in 1946-47. Several replicas have been made subsequently, as well as a few coachbuilt specials, but the one pictured above, the 1939 “Madame Michelin” car, is the only one with a fully traceable history, so it could be the only genuine 15-Six roadster in existence.
The Queen Of The Road’s Loyal Opposition
The 15-Six was born at a time when there was a glut of big French cars. I realize this sounds strange, but the ‘30s really was another world. To better understand the Citroën 15-Six’s appeal, let’s see how it compared to domestic cars with similar displacement and status.
Leaving out super-expensive blue-bloods like Bugatti or Voisin, as well as those that were below 12 CV (Berliet, Rosengart, Simca, etc.), a whopping 17 competitors remain in the 15-Six’s segment. Here they are, sorted in ascending order according to their 1939 list price.
The Citroën’s most dangerous fish in this crowded pond were the Matford V8s and the Renaults: modern-looking, well-appointed and well-built vehicles. But in terms of handling, technological advancement, safety, interior space, speed and value for money, the Citroën was way ahead. Most other marques could best the Citroën in terms of finish or luxury and could be more comfortable, but on the road, the cheaper and roomier 15-Six would always be the car in front. Of all the competitors, only Panhard also used an all-steel unit body construction – Licorne sort of did too, employing a Citroën body shell with a modified floor to mate it with their RWD chassis. Hydraulic brakes remained a minority, whereas independent front suspension was becoming the norm. The only aspect that really let the 15-Six down was its lack of a fourth speed; the popular Cotal electromagnetic gearbox could not be adapted for use on the Citroën.
Alas, the new luxury Traction’s career barely got started that it was overtaken by events: car production in most European countries was drastically cut down by 1940 for obvious reasons. A handful of the Sixes were still being made when Germany invaded France, but from 1941, the 15-Six went on a five-year hiatus. Several privately-owned cars were commandeered by the Germans, a few making it all the way to the Eastern Front.
Post-war Success
In 1946, the 15-Six went back into production, with 203 units made that year. The car was already eight years old, but its moment had finally come.
The first major modification to the 15-Six took place for MY 1948. The engine up to that point had been “turning left” (anti-clockwise), the opposite of the 4-cyl. Tractions. No one seems to know for sure why the 6-cyl. was designed this way initially. The engine’s rotation was switched to clockwise, necessitated by a new strengthened gearbox. This in turn led to a new grille: the starting handle’s shaft had moved up, the old hole was hidden by a pair of chrome wings. The engine also received a revised head and several smaller modifications – the power output of 77 hp @ 3800 rpm remained the same, though the compression ratio went down slightly, presumably to better cope with the lower quality of post-war gasoline. The first-generation (1938-47) cars retroactively became the 15-Six “G” for “Gauche” (left); the new 15-Six was nicknamed the 15-Six “D” for “Droite” (right).
Competition had thinned out by now: Renault and Panhard switched to small cars; many others had pulled out of car-making or were moribund (Chenard-Walcker, Unic, Licorne, etc.) or aimed further upmarket (Talbot-Lago, Delahaye) to the Bugatti level. Only Ford, Salmson and Hotchkiss were still directly competing with the 15-Six. The new Ford Vedette became the big Citroën’s main rival from 1948: it had a V8, it was comfortable, it had a real boot, it was more modern-looking and glitzier, and it was priced right. But the Vedette was slower, heavier, clumsier and thirstier that the 15-Six, and not as well built.
The 15-Six gradually put on more chrome with bigger hubcaps in 1950 and stouter straight bumpers in 1951.
The most substantial facelift came in late 1952: 18 years into its production run, the entire Traction Avant range was given a bigger boot, new interiors, front and rear turn signals, cowl-mounted windshield wipers and other small changes.
In 1954, the LWB models, which had been mothballed since the war, returned to the 11 and 15-Six ranges. Also, Tractions could now be ordered in blue or gray, though most still came out black.
In April 1954, the upcoming DS’s famous hydro-pneumatic suspension was debuted on the 15-Six’s egregiously rigid rear axle, becoming the “15-Six H”, though the normally-sprung 15-Six remained available through 1955.
The 15 H had the same engine but with a higher compression ratio, making it slightly more powerful (80hp @ 4000 rpm) and a bit quicker than the previous Six. To try and match the softer rear suspension, the 15 H had much longer torsion bars at the front, which stuck out on either side of the bottom of the grille.
This final iteration of the 15-Six was really a test-bed for the innovative suspension, though it did provide the fortunate few who could afford one, as well as a chauffeur, a level of comfort hitherto unknown in the back of a Traction. Production of all Citroën sixes stopped in 1956, as DS production ramped up.
The Traction Avant In Numbers
Just over 50,000 Citroën 15-Six G, D and H were made from 1938 to 1956, out of a total production of 759.111 Traction Avants (1934-1957). These may seem like paltry numbers by today’s standards, but in fact the 15-Six sold in much larger quantities than all its competitors (except Ford) and effectively captured the market for executive cars in France after the war.
Production was still ramping up when the war came; less than 2500 cars had been sold by 1940. The 15-Six’s top-selling year was 1951 with 11,752 units sold, similar to the one above. The only year it cracked the five-digit mark was twelve years after its debut, and five years before retirement. Some cars sure take their time to peak. As the very final innovation of the breed, the 15 H is usually considered to be a distinct model, though part of the 15-Six family. A little over 3000 were made in two years.
Six Specials And Foreign-Built Saloons
In 1955, French president René Coty, an older man with health problems, was recommended Citroën’s hydro-pneumatic suspension by his physician. He personally ordered a 15 H limousine (one of only two ever made, as the 15 H was only produced as a saloon), soon after having two new official state cars built on a stretched Citroën 15 H platform to replace both his predecessor’s Talbot-Lago convertible and Marshal Pétain’s 1942 Renault Suprastella town car.
The first 15 H-based state car was a limousine designed by Philippe Charbonneaux and bodied by Franay in 1955 – the coachbuilder’s final piece before closing shop.
The second presidential 15 H, a four-door convertible parade car, was made by Henri Chapron in 1956. Its peculiar beltline dip was designed by Carlo Delaisse so that the VIP likely sitting there might be better seen by the happy taxpayer in the street. These were in service until about 1974, when these and several other state cars were (bizarrely) donated by president Pompidou to one of his doctors. By all accounts, these cars’ longer and substantially heavier ash-framed bodies were very tough on the 80hp engine, so these were not usually driven on the open road, unlike the Citroën SM phaetons that replaced them.
Other interesting designs include the Swiss coachbuilt cars. The Traction was quite a hit outside France. Countries without large national automakers to turn to such as Austria, Scandinavia, Spain, Portugal, Benelux or Turkey were keen importers, as were the Swiss.
Switzerland also had several world-class master coachbuilders, such as Worblaufen, Beutler, Graber and many others. The great contribution of these coachbuilders was to provide a trickle of genuine two-door Tractions, which the Citroën factory was no longer making after the war.
By contrast, French carrossiers we not as inspired as their Swiss colleagues by the 15-Six (or by Citroëns in general in those days). The limousine above, an instersting illustration of the challenges many coachbuilders were facing with the spread of unit bodies. It’s clearly a pre-war LWB 15-Six body shell with heavily customized wings, a bigger trunk and a remodeled front end. The result is not exactly an improvement on the original.
One singular innovation was Georges Regembeau’s handful of genuinely fast Sixes, made in the mid-’50s. The only visible differences were the wire wheels, fatter tyres and a touch of extra brightwork. The engine was reassembled and finely tuned, given a supercharger and fuel injection, as well as a six-speed box and special brakes. Power jumped to 195 hp and one was clocked on the Montlhéry racetrack at 210 kph (130 mph).
A few dozens of cars were transformed by specialists to have a canvas roof – the découvrable”, a fad that hit its peak in the ‘50s. This 15-Six has an AEAT roof, as well as an aftermarket Grégoire suspension, designed by engineer Jean-Albert Grégoire, a FWD pioneer in his own right. These Grégoire all-alloy IRS set-ups were a welcomed improvement over the Traction’s notoriously stiff ride.
The Traction Avant was sold in many countries, but it was only made in three. Citroën had an assembly plant in Forest, Belgium, which assembled CKD cars from 1926 to 1980. Belgian-built Tractions, like the 15-Six above photographed at the 1951 Brussels Motor Show, had locally-sourced wheels, grilles, semaphores and other small details, and were available in colours other than black.
Tractions coming from the Citroën factory in Slough, Buckinghamshire, were also available in several hues. The cars also had very nice leather interiors. Many British-sourced components were used, including Smiths instruments for the lovely wood-clad dash, and oversized headlamps and electrics courtesy of Lucas “Prince of Darkness,” Ltd.
A good condition 15-Six can fetch €40,000-50,000. That’s ‘60s Cadillac money for the best ‘50s car the ‘30s ever gave us. It’s a bargain, it’s a steal. Speaking of which, this was probably the most successful getaway car of the ’40s and ‘50s. So successful that even the French police had to buy a few to keep up with the people they were trying to catch.
Due to the car’s long production run and multiple variants, there are two broad camps among Traction Avant connoisseurs: those who want the extra oomph and prestige of the Six, and those who prefer the lighter 4-cyl. cars. And it’s true that the latter are pretty irresistible, especially in pre-war roadster form.
So that was the story of the Citroën Traction Avant in general and the 15-Six in particular. It was beloved by everyone from bank CEOs to bank robbers. It was also the last French straight six ever made. They called it “la reine de la route” (Queen of the road), but human French royals were nowhere near as successful as this mechanical one.
Related CCs:
Curbside Classic: Citroen 11CV – A Traction Avant Sends Its Greetings From Switzerland, by Paul Niedermeyer
History Outake: Avant-Garde Traction Avant 22 CV, by Robert Kim
Classique de Traffic Parisienne: Citroen Traction Avant, by Jim Klein
Curbside Classic: Citroen Traction Avant en Indochine, by Robert Kim
Curbside Classic: 1950 Citroën 15-Six – Double Oxymoron (Austere Luxury, Old-fashioned Avant-garde), by Tatra87
A physician who prescribes Citroens? Is this available on the NHS?
What are the squinty lollipops on the limos all about?
The “lollipops” are the French tricolour emblem, essentially a stylised blue-white-red rosette. It should be on every car the president uses, though I’m not sure I’ve seen it on the post-SM presidential cars.
The highly amusing word for this tricolour rosette in French is (la / une) cocarde. Insert “election” pun here. Here’s that lolly in colour, on the ’69 DS Chapron presidentielle, looking a bit less ‘arde, somehow…
The many early problems of the Traction Avant mirror the early problems of the X car when introduced in 1980. As with Citroen within a few years the problems were fixed and later derivatives sold well over a long production run.
The Traction Avant literally was a deadly sin as it lead to bankruptcy. Today it of course is not thought of that way. It is recognized for it’s many innovations.
I wonder how many more years will pass before the Citation receives it’s proper due from automotive historians. The import loving press being so much of the source material for historians may taint history for a long time.
Thanks Tatra for this interesting history. I had wondered why a six did not carry over to the DS but can now see. A long nose wouldn’t have worked, and the percentage of production would have not justified a unique flat six.
DS was supposed to have a flat six, but Roger Carr’s article on the DS/ID says the engine was “lacking in power, too thirsty and too heavy, and was abandoned.” It’s a real shame.
Wonderful article Tatra87 as always.
Cheers John, glad you like this.
The Traction Avant was a textbook definition of a Deadly Sin (™ P. Niedermeyer). Some historians have argued that the banks and Michelin colluded to steer Andre Citroen towards the bankruptcy courts, but he should not have been so foolhardy.
The GM X car parallel, though, is a bit of a stretch. I’m not very familiar with these cars, but I have read a bit about them (here and elsewhere). Citroen was attempting something really huge. He burned his bridges by stopping the RWD cars and focused the whole company on a completely new and highly advanced car. It was almost quixotic.
It seems to me (again, not my forte, just my informed opinion) that the X car was flawed not because its creators were too ambitious, but because the development work was sloppy, corners were cut at every opportunity by GM management and the cars were not put together all that well.
How did Citation differ from any of the dozens of FWD cars that were made (some of them by GM itself) in the 50 years that preceded it to begin to justify why it had so many birth defects? The Traction was a pioneer — the X car was a latecomer.
Citroen was working against the clock, so he needed to be bold. GM was not under the same kind of pressure, so their failure is much less forgivable. If they were making the same mistakes as Citroen 45 years later, what does that say about them?
I don’t know that the X car’s history is tainted by “import-loving” media. I suspect there’s more to it than that. I understand that the trade press at the time were very impressed by the Citation and complemented GM on making a great car.
So if historians don’t write about the Citation in such glowing terms, there might be something afoot. Like consumer reports, memoirs / interviews from relevant journos / GM execs, / engineers, non-trade and foreign newspapers, letters from owners, class action lawsuits, internet forums, etc. You can’t write history if you only use one source.
Tatra, thanks for this long reply that makes many good points. The parallels I drew with the Citation are clearly imperfect due to the different times, the different price points of the cars and the different resources of GM and Citroen.
Briefly and in a friendly way I would push back on the Citation not being innovative. The Citation was not just another VW Dasher, Lancia Beta or Renault 16. A manual only, 70 hp1.6 liter Citation that did not make provision for A/C or power steering would have not sold at 10% of what the Citation sold. Incorporating higher output larger engines is difficult in the confined spaces. VW/Audi took baby steps in this direction with their 5 cylinder, in 1980 only in troublesome more expensive Audis. The Camry debuted 2.0 only. Honda a front drive specialist, was still 7 years away from an equivalent and then again 2.0 only. Saab 2.0 only and higher price point
The Citation required massive investment to convert many plants and had to operate in ways familiar to Nova in NVH. Another challenge achieved in spite of the large four, small size and fwd.
Bringing it back to Citroen, their history is replete with attempts to bring larger engines into their front drives. The SM, for just one example, was hardly a trouble free change to the DS. One wonders if any of this would have happened if a 1936 issue of French Consumer Reports and Mr. Citroen’s obituary were the only source material on Citroen.
“Comprehensive” is a seriously over-used word, but it surely applies here. Now we can all be experts on the Traction Avant.
This is a great article! I have always thought of The Traction Avant to be very elegant in appearance and now know so much more. Thank you.
Thank you for a comprehensive history of a fascinating car. I really like the leather and wood interior of the Slough Citroen. A grand routier indeed!
Now I am better informed about the Traction’s origins. The Anglicized? version is a surprise; can’t be British without wood & leather, old boy! Did they add the Leaking Oil? or was that standard?☺
C’est formidable! My CC on the Traction Avant from two years ago now can be tossed aside — this far more detailed history of the Traction Avant goes beyond anything that I could have conceived, let alone actually researched and written. The information about the many prewar French competitors that the Traction Avant outlasted, about which I knew nothing before, makes it even better.
Thanks for this. Lots of new details for me, including the odd case of engine rotation. I also did not fully appreciate that the 7 (and 11 Light) were almost completely different bodies, narrower too. Very ambitious.
I’ve long had a 15 in my fantasy garage. Now I can better pin down the exact year. 🙂
I saw a line up of old TAs once and something didnt look right about them this has cleared up that I knew the six had a longer front but I was sure an optical illusion was happening amongst the others, there was a major collection of Citroens locally unfortunately its been sold off and the cars dispersed so I only see occasional TAs other than the two hire cars in Napier
Wow, this should garner a Curbie nomination for sure! I had long known about the Avant, but had never really paid attention to the different “flavors”. I also would never have known what the last French inline six was. I wonder if this will ever turn up on a trivia quiz somewhere? It certainly should. Bravo.
This car may display my new favorite engine callout emblem ever. That huge 15 6 Cyl emblem (that requires four separate screws to attach it to the body) is a keeper.
Is there any further reading available on the Gregoire suspension? I’ve never heard of it and trying to find anything taxes my French to the breaking point
There’s not much out there in French either!
From what I gather, the Gregoire suspension debuted in 1948, but could be fitted to all Tractions. The set-up required a smaller set of rear torsion bars and softer shocks. The system was then bolted on the Traction’s rear axle. It provided “variable flexibility” (i.e. giving identical comfort whatever the car’s load on any road surface), and is alleged to be a very clever system that is a good half-way point between the “normal” Tractions and the 15 H’s hydro-pneumatic suspension.
J-A Gregoire claimed to have sold 10,000 of these kits for the Citroen (probably exaggerated). A related system was also sold as an after-maket kit on the Renault 4CV; Renault even licensed the design for their light trucks (not sure which ones). Hotchkiss, which was very involved with Gregoire for better or worse, also used this suspension on their cars from 1950 on.
So the Gregoire suspension could be (and was) adapted to FF, FR and RR layouts.
Shouldn’ t that be the “erection” pun? By the way, “êtes-vous le même Trata du Forum-Auto”?
That’s the essence of the pun — free and fair…
“Non, je ne suis pas Tatraplan.”
I only lurk on that forum. Tatraplan is a published author. I’m just an amateur 🙂
Not so amateur judging by this!
Besides, surely having a string of articles on CC qualifies as ‘publication’.
Great piece on a great car, which has an important slot in history as well as fantasy garages.
You’ve filled in a lot of the gaps I had in the history and evolution of the Traction Avant, and the number of variations is larger than I had realised. A second reading is booked!
I have to say I prefer the French interior to the the British built one – it reinforces my view that Rolls and Jaguar can do wood’n’leather, others not really, IMHO.
Absolutely fantastic article, includes a lot of information other sources I’ve read only hint at. I had no idea France had so much pre-war competition for the 15CV – it must have been a totally different country/culture before the war. Major kudos for the table comparing the competition. And the different (but same-looking) body on the 7CV – I’ve seen one with the small body but couldn’t put my finger on what looked so different about it.
Amazing – both Andre Citroen for conceiving this model range, and Tatra87 for documenting it so well.
I have had an Onze Normale ( large body 4 cylinder) since 1999 and have to say they are an incredibly driveable car. They corner and steer like a much newer car but the gearchange from the mustard spoon lever is quite tricky.
I live in Dublin, Ireland but was in New York one weekend in around 2006 and managed to attend a Citroen Traction Avant rally run by a professor from Rutgers in New Jersey. We drove out into the country somewhere to some sort of a castle (can’t remember the name) but on the way back I got to drive one of the guy’s 6 H.
So to compare, the ride was of course much softer without the jarring up your spine that you get in the regular car.
Regarding the difference between the 4 and the 6, well I prefer the 4 by a large margin. The weight of the 6 and the wider tyres, 165 as against 145 for the 4, made the steering much more unpleasant.
So Paul, if you ever get to act on your mythical garage. Test drive a 4 before you pick the 6.
And I have to say the comment regarding the Citation is the most egregious thing I have heard of in a long time. Simply bizzare.
Finally, the Traction Owners Club in the UK has all the special tools required to service the car, particularly the pullers for the hubs and suspension ball joints. I am lucky enough to hold a set of these tools for Ireland and lend them out a few times a year.
This weekend I am helping a friend with a DS recommission it . Wish me luck
Richard Sheil
Dear Richard Sheil,
a reply after more than 6 years, but I just read it today and as an owner of a 15 H I have to differ.
Yes,you are absolutely right, the steering is stiff and a turning circle of about 17 meters (!) doesn’t make things easier. At slow speed you have to keep the car rolling,turning the wheel when the car is standing still is something you don’t want to have. You have to plan your moves and to learn how to grip the wheel to use not only your hands but both arms and the upper body as well. That”s not as bad as it sounds and you soon get used to that. And when you speed up you will get an incredible torque, 3rd gear from 25 to 130 kilometers per hour, cruising effortlessly at 100, securely overtaking trucks and have a road holding just incredible for a 70 year old car, technically dating back to the thirties. It really was “la reine de la route ” and you can drIve it in today’s traffic without any problems. And driving like that you can feel the car, have to accept it’s idiosyncrasies, live with it,accept it’s limits and get rewarded,completely different to modern,anonymous technical slaves that just do as they are told.
So,if you get the chance,try it once more and see if the steering is really all you can say about it.
Best wishes C Kühfuss
Brilliant article, thank you for chronicling the development and clearly showing the range, availability, and relevant characteristics.
I’ve long liked the TA, but until now have never had a clear picture of the variations, something shared with many English speakers writing on the subject, I suspect. Not sure of numbers (Slough built) sold locally but they have a decent survival rate if appearances at shows are any indication.
I do remember often seeing this particular car, in silver, when commuting through North Sydney years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Mack_(politician)
Definitely one for the CC Legacy file.
Thanks for a fantastic article Tatra87. I’ve read various historical accounts of Citroen cars over the last 30 years or so, and this is probably the most informative and nuanced. Excellent.
Wonderful article. Also, to pick up on the mention of Georges Regembeau, could he be another worthy candidate for a CC ?
The DS’s and SM’s which he produced, a few hundred of each, re-engineered with special engines and gearboxes, took these cars to another level of performance. His design, development, and manufacturing were to advanced standards, not shade-tree stuff.
The info available about ‘GR’ on the web is mostly in French – but even mangled into by English by Google Translate, it comes over as a fascinating story.
Were dashboard mounted rear-view mirrors a fashion in all French cars of the same period?
Amazing and very thoroughly informative article! I am learning more and more about Traction Avant and the variations. Thanks, Tatra87!
By the way, I recalled a TA convertible driven by Indiana Jones with his sidekick father in the fourth film, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. They crashed the car into the bomb crater. No idea which TA it was…
You’re welcome!
The Indiana Jones (3rd film, I believe) Traction is a fake cabriolet 11 legere (made from a post-war car).
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_3149-Citroen-11-Legere-Cabriolet-1954.html
Incredible article with essentially all-new information for me. Congratulations on thorough research well presented.
I would point out that as one of little boys who read British comics in the ’50s, and thus kept in full WW2 hero mode with an eye out for spies, I’d know immediately that the group who partook of a sherry before setting out were foreigners. A sherry is used in Blighty as an aperitif before a substantial meal, as anyone knew. Having a sherry, then setting out on a trip is highly suspicious! Especially in a leather-lined, walnut dashboard bolide whose occupants would be of the upper class and fully aware of their manners. “It’s just not done, old man.”
Of course, these days, they try to market the sweet wine as an anytime drink for dissipated former lushes, even recommending it for brekkie. Um, yuh, add it to yogurt for a special experience.
Despite the extra weight on the front wheels, I’d have me the Six for the smoothness and better ride. It would hardly be daily transport. The Gregoire addition to the rear suspension is typically French and thus its working incomprehensible from that advertisement. Something’s not being shown, such as the end attachments for the cross-bar holding the front (on the right) auxiliary coil spring mount. I have theories but who really knows but the designer himself. J A Gregoire was a bit of a genius, having come up with the almost constant velocity Tracta joint for FWD prior to the current modern version, and he knew what he was up to – WW2 Jeeps had them at the front.
So no doubt his spring contraption worked – it actually seems to act as a rising rate spring that prevented bottoming, but worked independent of initial load, leading me to believe its crossbar attached to the two trailing arms aft of their main pivots. So softer main torsion bars with an auxiliary rising rate helper spring for large wheel deflections to prevent unseemly bottoming-out would indeed allow a softer ride under normal conditions.
Again, great article.
I have a 1951 15 six that I would like to sell. It is mostly complete including bumpers. The under body has rust through issues. Asking $7.950 but willing to listen to any offers or trades. Car is located north of Houston, Tx.. Thanks Mike 214-232-6827
A fantastic article! The headlight surrounds for the still-born 22CV remind me of the headlight styling for the 1934 Hupmobile range. What is the story behind that Danish batch of 1950 11 BL delivery vans? And finally, why was the “15 cyl” badge originally placed on the right rear mudguard?
Glad you liked it, thanks!
The Danish 11s were (I think) CKD kits that Citroen needed to get rid of, and the Danish importer figured he could assemble them cheaply and sell them as delivery cars. Probably a lot of hard discounting and/or tax-related issues under there as well.
The badge on the right rear mudguard… er — as opposed to where? The left one had the stop light (only one from 1936 to 1954) and the license plate housing, at least in France. The big chromed “15 Six” kind of balances out the license plate and stop light. Plus, it differentiates the more exclusive 15-Six from the otherwise indistinguishable (from the rear) 11 B.
A 1939 cabriolet, presumably an 11, that I snapped a few years ago:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12119356@N00/albums/72177720303193060
Nice rereading this Tatra, Im still not seeing many TAs around the move to Auckland may account for that though I got a wave from a guy in a very nice late DS on my way to work today he must have spotted the chevrons on my cars grille I saw him from a block away.