Despite having now owned her 2013 Mercedes GLK for four and a half years, it recently occurred to me that I haven’t written much about Mom’s current daily driver, except for in comments and briefly in my mother’s day tribute to her a few years back. Especially considering that a new addition will soon be arriving in our driveway, I thought there was no better time than now to give the Benz a proper review.
Purchased in June 2013, this GLK 350 4Matic was Mom’s first brand-new car in a decade, and her first brand-new car from a luxury make, as the 2007 BMW X3 she traded in for it was purchased certified pre-owned back in March 2010. It was Mom’s self-proclaimed retirement gift to herself, as a good portion of the downpayment came from the reimbursement check she received from her employer, paying her for all her unused sick days accumulated in her 37-year teaching career.
Always a major criteria in her past vehicle purchases, the styling of the GLK was the driving force for what originally got Mom interested in it several years prior. Remaining in at the top of her shortlist for next cars, the GLK was in fact the first car we looked at, with the intent of test driving the X3 and Q5 after. Mom, however, loved how it drove, loved the interior, and decided that it was the car. The dealer was able to locate her preferred Steel Gray Metallic over Almond MB-Tex with the panoramic moonroof out of state for her, and in about a week Mom had her new Mercedes.
Though not fully-spec’d out, the GLK came with some nice additions new to Mom such as Bluetooth for phone and audio, satellite radio, the “basic” Becker map pilot navigation system, power tailgate, power adjustable steering column, as well as amenities she had grown accustomed to like heated front seats, power lumbar support, and the moonroof which she had to have but still has never used to this day. I’m still glad she opted for it, as I prefer the shade open for greater light, and do in fact open it year round for air.
As stated, the GLK’s exterior styling was a major reason for its purchase. Boxy and upright in a world where most CUVs, including its GLC successor, conform to the same basic curvy shape, the GLK truly stood out as decidedly more muscular with its many straight body lines, chiseled fascias, sculpted bodysides, and flared wheel arches. We both liked the GLK’s styling better than any of the other cars she was considering, and I think it has held up very well.
It’s safe to say that Mom bought her GLK at a prime time, as 2013 was the year Mercedes treated its then-smallest SUV and only German-assembled SUV besides the G-wagen, to an extensive refresh. Visually, the exterior was given a heavy facelift, gaining a redesigned grille, lower fascia and headlights, along with the addition of a chrome skid plate and LED running lights for a smoother, more elegant appearance than the original 2009-2012 design.
Around back, similar enhancements came in the form of a new rear bumper with redesigned trapezoidal exhaust tips, new reflector strips, as well as a chrome skid plate to match the front. New full-LED taillights also arrived, featuring attractive teardrop shape LEDs when illuminated. GLKs also received a new standard 19-inch wheel design, which Mom’s car features.
The most striking visual change for 2013 came to the interior, which featured a redesigned dash and center console, highlighted by a single piece of burl walnut veneer spanning the width of the dashboard from the steering wheel to the passenger side door. Reportedly the single largest piece of wood veneer Mercedes had used in a modern production car, the walnut’s curved edges and sculpted lines make for a very natural look that I never tire of. It is without question, my favorite small styling feature of the car.
In conjunction with the new dashboard came new aircraft-inspired circular aluminum HVAC vents, identical to those found in Mercedes’ SL and SLS roadsters. A thicker leather-wrapped steering wheel with contrast stitching and aluminum accents replaced the rather cheap looking steering wheel of the 2009-2012 models.
Mercedes also relocated the gearshift from its traditional center console location between the seats to the steering column in the form of a small turn signal-like stalk. This is probably the one feature that neither I nor my mother like. The location and design of the shifter is not very intuitive, and while an additional storage compartment is appreciated, both of us like to rest our right hands atop a console shifter when driving, something this car prevents.
One thing Mom especially has grown to like is the “hold” function for the brakes, which after a second firm depress of the brake pedal, allows the driver to take their foot off the brake pedal, while the brakes and brake lights stay on until pressure is applied to the gas.
From a mechanical standpoint, M-B treated the GLK to bit of a performance upgrade for 2013 as well, giving it the newer 3.5L V6 found in the ML- and E-Class. Making a very respectable 302 horsepower and 273 lb-ft torque, for gains of 34 and 15, respectably, mated to its 7-speed automatic, the GLK 350 4Matic posts a 0-60 time of 5.8 seconds. But drag racing is not what the GLK is meant for nor used for in our case.
What ultimately sold Mom on the GLK was how it drives. From the purposeful, very Germanic “grunt” from its 3.5L V6 delivering ample power to all four wheels, to the way it glides down the road with ultra quietness from the cabin, soaking up all but the worst of Massachusetts’ many pot holes, the GLK is a true testament to Mercedes-Benz’s reputation for engineering some of the world’s greatest luxury cars.
Everything about the way the GLK handles is so serene, it doesn’t make you want to drive aggressively. It has more than enough power on demand to the point of what I might say is more than needed for a car of this nature. A nod to its luxury-oriented nature, the GLK is perfectly happy cruising at low RPMs, dare I say lazily, without any sense of urgency to rev any higher. Push it a little though, and it responds with an immense growl and surge of power, almost as if it’s snapping back at you for not letting it just be. By all means, the GLK 350 is pretty damn fast.
Like most luxury cars these days, the GLK can be put into Sport Mode on the fly with a touch of a button. While the difference between sport and normal mode isn’t a drastic as in the BMWs, sport does increase throttle response for even quicker acceleration. Regardless of driving mode, steering is very luxury car-oriented and heavily electrically-assisted, lacking much feedback.
This is acceptable for the GLK, though, as its high center of gravity and comfort-tuned suspension make it a far better back-road cruiser than a car you push hard through twisting turns, though that isn’t to say that I haven’t pushed it hard through twisting turns on winding back roads and had a lot of fun doing so. Dynamically speaking, the GLK 350 is a little softer than what I personally prefer in a daily driver, but for its intended mission, it delivers a wonderful driving experience that is near perfect.
I’m happy to report that from a reliability standpoint, the Mercedes’ record has remained spotless — not a single issue in the now four plus years and 74,000 miles she’s been driving it. Unfortunately, the GLK has had the misfortune of being involved in three, yes three, collisions in that time.
The first involved Mom accidentally backing out of the garage with the tailgate open, clipping the top of the opened garage door with the end of the opened tailgate. Though there was no visible damage to either the car or the garage door, it was soon apparent that there was internal damage done to the tailgate’s electric motor. A several thousand dollar repair due to the extensive labor, it was fixed through insurance resulting in accident #1 on the Carfax.
The second, and most visibly damaging fender bender occurred in 2016 when pickup truck towing a low trailer stopped short in front of Mom in an intersection, resulting in her crashing into the back of it, doing significant damage to the front bumper, grille, and quarter panel. Accident #2.
The third, and hopefully last accident to date involved a woman in an older Camry rear-ending the GLK in traffic. Though there was only minor visible damage to the bumper, and she was initially hesitant to even bother dealing with the woman’s insurance company to get it repaired, mom’s trusted collision shop informed her there was actually greater internal damage. At least she wasn’t paying anything out of pocket for that repair.
The car is perfectly fine now, but as anyone in the industry can tell you, the presence of an accident, let alone three, on a vehicle’s history will significantly affects its trade-in and resale value. Additionally, high miles versus a vehicle’s age, something this car has, will also lower its value. The reason I bring this up is because earlier this year is when Mom seriously began thinking about getting a new car.
(An older picture from the GLK’s first Christmas)
As her pattern has shown over the past few decades, Mom typically purchases a new car on average of every 4-5 years, usually very shortly after her current car is paid off. Naturally, I cautioned her about her car’s trade-in value, which while not enthused about, she perfectly understood. Furthermore, with its lack of any reliability issues thus far, less than any vehicle Mom’s owned in recent years, even the Toyota Highlander, the Mercedes hopefully has a good amount of life left in it. Then there’s also the fact that Mom and I both really like the car itself.
(For Christmas 2015, I had my late-grandfather’s low-number plates proudly reissued in Mom’s name)
To make a long story short, we both came to the same thought, and it was actually Mom who said it out loud first: keep the GLK, and go halves with each other on a new car that we’ll both get to enjoy. After all, we both love cars. Time for each of us will be split between our own respective cars (the GLK and 228) and this new vehicle, which we are excitedly awaiting delivery of as I write this, thereby reducing the miles put on each vehicle.
If anything, this speaks truths about the GLK’s many positive virtues and my mom’s love for it. I really can’t say nor do I wish to speculate how long she will keep the GLK, but barring any unforeseen circumstances, I have a feeling it will remain in our household for years to come.
Photographed at Old Scituate Lighthouse in Scituate, Massachusetts – November 2017
Very nice car.
My mother (god rest her soul) was not the sort of person to replace a car every 4-5 years. Usually, she drove them until something went wrong and then she replaced them. She would probably never go for something like this Mercedes, as she was more focused on spending that money on taking care of kids than a car (My parents have/had that good ol’ Midwestern frugalness running through their veins). Plus, she had two different experiences with two different Mercedes and was disappointed both times. Of course, her Mercedes junkie son had a difference of opinion.
I’m not a fan of Crossovers. I just find that, full-size SUVs are more of my cup of tea. But, if there was one crossover I would happily drive if I was forced to, it would be the Mercedes GLK. Its the only crossover I can think of off the top of my head that I instantly like. Part of that is the styling, which I find attractive, especially funny considering that I’ve found Mercedes styling post 1994 to be, very mixed to say the least. I certainly think the GLK looks better than the GL and G Wagon, even though those don’t look bad, they’re just nothing that special.
If I could put the GLK in simple terms, I would say that it does everything right that the first generation ML did wrong. The GLK takes the idea of a “Mercedes Benz made crossover” and does it well. You probably would not be surprised to hear that I think its successor, the GLC, doesn’t look nearly as attractive.
My wife did get a first generation ML (20002 year model). After five model years Mercedes-Benz had taken care of most of the bugs with the original. Even the salesperson at the dealership admitted the first W163s had their issues.
After seven years and many miles, including several “summer expeditions” in which she and our children took multi-week trips covering 4-6000 miles, we traded the still fresh looking ML on a 2010 GLK 350. We had no first-year problems with this X204 and my wife loved the smaller size of the GLK vs. the ML. By this time the children were grown and out on their own. My wife and sister-in-law continued the tradition of long summer vacations up the east coast, west coast, and through the Rockies and Appalachians. These are adventurous women who enjoy their extended vacations after months of long hours at work.
In 2015, realizing that M-B was going to change the body style of the GLK (for the worse IMO) I traded the 2010 GLK 350 for a new 2015 model. My wife had already rolled up over 100,000 miles on the 2010 anyway. She liked her ML a lot, really, really liked the 2010 GLK and adores the 2015 version. The improvements are evident. Even today she is heading out on a 600+ mile trip over the weekend to the Texas Hill Country to take care of some family business.
I’m in agreement with both of you regarding the GLK versus the GLC. Mom was given a GLC as a loaner just about a year ago while in for an oil change. I will say that its sportier driving experience was more to my liking, but the rest of the GLC was just kind of “blah”. A nice all-around crossover, but far more vanilla than the GLK.
And @fintail jim:
The GLK is a really great road trip car! We’ve taken it back and forth to New York a few times (4-5 hours each way), and it’s a really great interstate cruiser, as well as compact enough to easily drive in downtown Manhattan traffic.
Brendan, I have to agree with you on all counts. While Houston is no Manhattan we do appreciate the GLK’s more compact exterior dimensions and good turning radius in the increasingly crowded city. It also acquits itself very well on Texas’ highways where I consistently get fuel mileage in the mid- to high-20s even while slightly [grin] fudging Texas speed limits.
I love the design of these GLKs… You’re right, they were a standout design. One of Mercedes’ stupidest decisions was to not engineer this for RHD, meaning Australia missed out. It would have sold very well here…
While I don’t like this interim period of Mercedes design, where they transitioned from gorgeous, sharp lines (W212 E-Class) to the shapely curves and poor inter-model distinction of their current models (eg C, E and S), the GLK came off better than the facelifted W212. And I agree, that wood is quite a distinctive touch!
My mind occasionally wanders to getting a crossover. I mean, the whole point is to have your cake and eat it too, right? Car-like dynamics, SUV/minivan-style versatility… It sounds great! The problem is I don’t really need the versatility and crossovers often still have a deficit in fuel economy compared to their equivalent sedans. But if I was buying a used luxury car, I would be very tempted by one of these. The contemporary top-of-the-line X3 had similar power figures but I prefer the look of the GLK…
The all-too-familiar looks of Mercedes’ current vehicles, particularly the sedans really bother me. I mean, they aren’t unattractive, but I’m getting so tired of that melted design language and not being able to tell a C from an E from an S unless up close.
You know that I’m more of a sedan/coupe person, but I do get the appeal of a CUV and I do enjoy switching it up once in a while.
Mom drove the 2nd generation X3 on several occasions. She always liked it and said she would’ve been happy with it, but it just didn’t have the emotional appeal to her that the GLK did.
I have not been a fan of the modern stuff from MB, but I like these. I agree that the styling on these is exactly what Mercedes needed for this class of vehicle.
Hmmm, a new fun car for you and your Mom to share? I understand she knows someone who could get her a good deal on a Mini. 🙂
It’s still a shame Mercedes ditched the GLK’s boxy styling for the GLC’s. But we all know that blandness sells more, and that’s just what Mercedes’ goal was with the GLC.
And you’ll just have to wait and see 🙂 I’m sure it will come as a surprise to some… and to some it won’t at all.
I really really like that giant piece of wood on the dash. Coupled with the nifty AC vents in chrome it’s pretty spectacular.
Overall a very nice looking vehicle.
Ah, Mercedes just stole that vent design from the Great Wall X200. 😉
Let’s just say that wood veneer gets sliced and/or peeled from logs and comes in very large pieces. About as big as you want. But it does look good.
I agree. These really help differentiate a Mercedes
I love this design and this past summer as I was car shopping with my Mother, we checked out the new GLC and it’s not as nice as this. Also looked at GLA, nice. But ultimately, she went with the Audi Q3.
Will never be in the market for any kind of Mercedes-Benz but if I was I think I would have driven the BMW…and MAYBE the Audi before spending this kind of money.
Being built in Germany is a big plus, in my book, for this vehicle, but the Audi is German-built too, isn’t it?
Love the interior, but not crazy about the instrument cluster.
BTW, I wrote the above before “conferring” with the magazine CAR. Their capsule opinion on the 2017 (same model as this one?) is quoted below:
“GLC…
GLK replacement project, now available in right-hand drive. Sounds like you shouldn’t care, but the interior might just make you moist.
VERDICT: Rivals are cheaper, better to drive-GLC makes you feel special inside”
The original US-market Audi Q5 was German built, but the new (now current) Q5 is now Hecho en Mexico.
Volkswagen-Audi Group has many factories all over the world…
For 2017:
A1 in Brussels, Belgium
A3 Cabrio in Győr, Hungary
TT (all variations) in Győr, Hungary
Q3 in Martorell, Spain
Q7 in Bratislava, Slovakia
Mom drove the previous generation X3 on several occasions over the years, as loaners when she had her ’07 X3, and at a head-to-head comparison test drive event back in 2011 where she drove the GLK and Q5.
As I said replying to Will Stopford’s comment, she liked the X3 just fine, but it didn’t do much for her in the excitement department. Having owned the first generation X3, she was ready for something different. She liked the Q5’s interior, but we both found it under powered by comparison. That still wasn’t enough to knock it off her list, but after driving the GLK, she knew it was the one.
I wonder what brand the new car will be…Gee, I just can’t put my finger on it…:-)
I’ve been waiting for this for several years now – I once got the identical car as a loaner for a week due to the dealership losing the key while servicing our car and took pix intending to write it up but then figured you would do so sooner or as it turned out, very later! I wasn’t enamored with it the first day but the more I drove it, the more I liked it, to the point of not wanting to give it back at the end of the week. As you stated, it does drive very serenely, it’s a relaxing vehicle to drive.
One minor nit – I believe the big boy G-Wagen is and always has been built in Graz, Austria under contract by Magna-Steyr.
I’m sure you have a few guesses 🙂 It’s a car that appeals to me very much, and one I talked her into, though admittedly it didn’t take much convincing.
But seriously, I’m surprised it took me so long as well. I had the intention of writing about it 2-3 years ago, but just kind of forgot about it. I’ve never had the chance to drive the GL. I do like the design of yours better than the current GL/GLS.
And I think you’re right about the G-Wagen. That was where Mom’s 2007 X3 was built, and they still build some of BMW’s vehicles today.
You forget to mention the ergonomic blunder MB made with this facelift- moving the cruise control lever from its intelligent and proper position over the left Combination stalk to under it.
MB has been doing a lot of this recently: moving window switches to the door panels, same with heater and lock switches- those things all belong on the center console. Worse, they switched from the easily understood labeling practices they have been using heretofore to the incomprehensible ones that other car manufacturers use.
I like how the GLK manages to have both the traditional Mercedes instrument layout and the digital information screen. The newest designs have switched to a harder to read two dial set up that places 80 mph well to the left, and away from dead center, where it should be.
Moving the window switches to the door panels is due to the lobbying effort of Kids and Co. organisation. This is to prevent the accidental strangulation or pinching of limbs by power window winders.
Look at the fourth bulletin point:
http://www.kidsandcars.org/how-we-save-lives/policy-laws-regulation/
I never use cruise control and have never tried in this car so I couldn’t tell you 😉
It’s cool that you and your mother are able to share a fun car. My mom’s dream cars are either the Murano or the RX (and she’ll probably pull the trigger on one of them soon)…plus she lives 300 miles away, so we won’t be sharing any cars anytime soon.
I actually like the transmission selector position on the GLK. It recalls the column shifters of yore. Plus this shifter design brings hope that the “great wall of center console epoch” is at an end. I don’t know what I hate more about today’s cars, the “gun slit” style windows and lowered roof or the ginormous center consoles.
Best looking of the cars in its class. Stephanie would have liked this.
Given some of her previous vehicles you’ve shared, I think it’s right up her alley. Mom has obviously been very happy with it so far.
Nice write up Brendan. The GLK has a nice distinctive design while its replacement the GLC looks so generic. There was a time when automotive journalists would have had a hissy fit if any car had the bright work that the GLK has on the dash and steering wheel but now it’s considered de rigueur.
This is really the only Mercedes in the recent past (other than a diesel GWagen) that had appeal to me … to the point where I actually went into an MB dealership for the first time in my life to look at one, after the 2.5 diesel was released in the US. But the combination of price, and lack of space efficiency compared to what I was used to, plus concerns about MB cost of ownership stopped me before I even test drove it. Still a handsome vehicle, and as others also feel, better looking than it’s successor.
When it comes to cars, I usually also choose one first based on its aesthetic qualities too. Brendan, this GLK is very nice and I see a lot of similarities in the squared off design to your old Highlander. A design I particularly like since I just added a first generation Highlander to my fleet. The boxy look really goes well with this vehicle’s purpose.
I’ve noticed that too actually. Upright profile, similar D-pillars, and even taillights that are the same shape.
Come to think of it, with the exception of the Fiat 124 Spyder and the BMW X3, every vehicle my mom has purchased so far in her forty-something years of driving have been very boxy in their styling.
I have to hand it to you, Brendan – normally, I’d pass over an article about an M-B sport ute in favor of one about vehicles I find more interesting.
But I’ve read other articles of yours, and I like your writing. So I read it and enjoyed it greatly.
Very true. Brendan’s name on an entry ensures a good read.
Dan and Chris, thank you both very much. Those kind words truly mean a lot to me. I try to put my heart into every article I write, and it really means a lot when others enjoy it 🙂
Joining all the others who have a soft spot for this vehicle because of its looks. It is the only modern M-B I would consider owning (as well as the only CUV) but the price… Oh the price (good used ones, even 5 year old start around the €25-30K here). It is a good vehicle, but it is not THAT good.
“For Christmas 2015, I had my late-grandfather’s low-number plates proudly reissued in Mom’s name”
The plate number caught my eye as soon as I saw the lead photo! You and I had a conversation about your grandfather’s plate number at one point, although I can’t locate the post at the moment. IIRC, you posted a picture of his green-on-white plate with a 1989 expiration sticker on it, probably marking the point when the Registry mass replaced the green-on-white plates for the reserved number series with Spirit of America plates.
My father, who passed away in 2015, had a plate from a similar series (one letter followed by four numbers), which my mother still has on her car. I believe there are a several old plates with his reserved number in my parents’ garage, including a set of the white-on-green plates issued in 1966, the last of the dated, new-plates-issued-every-other-year Mass. issues. I’ve always fantasized about getting a 1966 or 1967 model car (the ’66 plates would have been used both years) and seeing if I could have the plate number transferred to that car and use the ’66 plates as YOM plates.
Were you able to just request the number, and if it happened to not be in use and you were willing to pay for it, you could have it? Or was there any significance to the fact that it was being issued within the same family of the person who previously had it?
I recall that conversation, but can’t remember which post either!
I just called up the number for the MA Special Plates department and requested that number. Once they confirmed it was available, they asked which registry I wanted the plates sent to and it was that simple… of course they flubbed up and sent them to the registry all the way out in Springfield, and not Braintree, so we had to straighten that out and it took a few extra weeks.
But apart from that hiccup it was not extra charge and pretty easy. Mom even made a friend at the Braintree RMV when she picked the new plates up who kind of gave her a “skip the line pass” if she ever needed anything else 🙂
It’s funny how this differs state by state- in IL we’ve gone through so many different patterns that it would take a true aficionado to tell when a plate was issued. In my lifetime we have gone through 3 letters, 3 numbers, to 2 letters 4 numbers, to 3 numbers 4 numbers, to 2 letters 5 numbers, and these are only the combinations I can remember.
The kicker is that I tried to get my dad’s old late 70s-early 80s 3 letter 3 number plate reregistered last year and that is no longer a valid IL plate, even as a vanity or personalized plate. However, my current plate is a special Blackhawks plate with MINI 1 as the tag. I think our Secretary of State does a pretty darn good job running the place, but this logic eludes me.
The plate numbers in the Massachusetts series we’re talking about aren’t standard, regular-issue numbers. I don’t know if they were at one time, but since at least the 1960s they have been treated as “reserved” numbers. I believe you pay extra to have a registration with one of these numbers, and you are guaranteed to always keep the number, even if you have to get a new plate. Based on Brendan’s experience, you can apparently obtain one of these numbers if you ask for one.
My wife has a similar plate number on her car. She entered a “lottery” a few years ago for a low plate number, and won one that is just four numbers.
As for standard, regular-issue Massachusetts numbers, their history seems similar to Illinois. During the era of the green-on-white plates (first issued 1977, completely replaced the previous plate design by about 1984, used for all regular-issue plates until around 1993, supply of new plates not completely exhausted until about 1997, still valid if registration has been maintained continuously and owner has chosen not to replace them), all plates seemed to be 3 numbers/3 numbers or 3 numbers/3 letters. The early years of the Spirit of America plates (introduced in 1987, but not used for regular-issue plates until around 1993) continued the 3 number/3 letter pattern. Since the late 1990s, numerous different permutations have followed.
Once a regular-issue number has been taken out of circulation, Massachusetts does not seem to like re-using it. As with CJC’s experience in Illinois, I’d be surprised if Massachusetts would allow you to re-use a plate number with the 3 number/3 number or 3 number/3 letter pattern, even as a vanity plate. I suspect that they don’t want a number that theoretically should be a regular-issue number used as a special/reserved number, even if it’s not currently in use as a regular-issue number. For example, I’ve never seen a Spirit of America plate with a 3 number/3 number or 3 number/3 letter plate number that would have originally come out on a green-on-white plate.
I’ve never been a fan of SUVs or those (mostly) silly-looking crossovers, but this GLK is a beautiful vehicle, attractive from every angle. The interior looks superb, and love the elegant simplicity of the dash. I bet the trade-in / resale value of these is top notch.
Pretty color combination and that swath of veneer is amazing! I do wonder if the interior door trim design is too simple/plain, at least on the back door that’s open in one of the pics.
I really want to dislike MBTex but even the newer versions of it seem to hold up really well. I have trouble wrapping my head around the concept of a luxury vehicle with vinyl seats but that seems to be the direction lots of automakers are going. If MB would sell cars in the US with cloth seats that would be slick…like the saffron ribbed velour in the 76 450SE gray market car I owned briefly…
It’s funny- when the GLK first came out, it screamed “Subaru Forester” to me- and OLD Forester, at that. I also saw the Highlander in it- and it was a huge turnoff. Time soothed my impressions and now, it reads as refined, solid and sharp. I hope we all enjoy aging as well.
A 2012 GLK is my current COAL. I wanted the 2013, mainly for its extra go, but a 2012 service loaner sold as CPO in October 2013 with 10k miles on the clock, with a price 11K below new (and 13K below the 2013), won me over. I love both its styling and the way it drives.
The cruise control and common stalk were switched in 2013, as noted by others. It made test-driving both, something of an adventure. I started with the 2012 and activated the CC by accident , but after learning it, it seemed that the prior (2012) configuration made more sense. I also hated the shift stalk; so much so that this might have been what made me decide on the ’12.
Mine has been trouble – free also, and I’m now at 108K. Barring the onset of expensive repairs, I intend to keep it for a while. There is nothing like it on the road today (including its successor, which to me is as dull as dishwater) except the G-Wagon, and well, forget that at whatever house-level price it sits.