Nathan Williams caught a VW Hebmüller Cabriolet on the go in London. No, this is not the classic VW Cabriolet that was built for so many decades by Karmann. The sportier Hebmüller 2+2 Cabrio was available alongside the four-seat Cabriolet at VW dealers from 1949 – 1953, but only 696 were ever built, so these are now very rare and valuable.
I’ve been wanting to write up a “Heb” for years, so here goes….but then looking at this one closely makes me suspect that it’s a later conversion; a fake, in other words. But I’ll still do its history, regardless. Even really good Heb fakes (if this is one) are not exactly common either.
The 1938 KdF Wagen was intended to be built in three body styles; a sedan, a sunroof sedan and a cabriolet. The cabrio prototype was shown at the 1938 groundbreaking ceremony for the new KdF factory, and at the end of the ceremonies, Porsche drove Hitler back to his private train in it. Hitler never learned to drive, despite being a car fanatic, preferring the back seat. I’m guessing Porsche didn’t push the seat back very far, but then he was short anyway.
We’ve told the early postwar story of how the Beetle was saved from extinction by the British Occupational Forces, in the form of the very determined Major Ivan Hirst. He managed to scrape together enough old parts and a few new ones, and start up production of the sedan in 1946 on a very limited basis. It’s hard to image now, but Hirst struggle dnot only to find the parts to build them but also a market in which to sell them, as Germans were in no position to buy new cars in 1946.
Colonel Charles Radclyffe was in charge of the actual plant. After some discussions about what might sell—or was it what they personally wanted to drive?—Hirst had a team build a roadster for Colonel Radclyffe, dubbed the Radclyffe Roadster, naturally.
It was a roadster inasmuch as it was intended to be as close to a sports car as possible, and had cut down windows, a low roadster collapsible roof, and only two front seats. Colonel Radclyffe was quite happy tooling around in his eponymous roadster, but nothing came of it initially. Unfortunately, there’s no images if it on the web, or possibly elsewhere.
In 1948, after the VW factory was turned over to the Germans under the direction of Heinz Nordoff, Nordoff decided it would be a good idea to build a little sporty cabriolet very much along the lines of the Radclyffe Roadster, having seen it, undoubtedly. Nordoff hired Joseph Hebmüller to build it. His coachbuilding firm of Hebmüller and Sons, founded in 1889, was of course interested in any work they could get during this difficult post-war era.
Hebmüller used as many parts of the Beetle as possible to build the sporty cabrio; eventually three protoypes were built, including this one.
Here’s a shot of it in profile, with the top down.
And with top up. The three prototypes were extensively tested by VW and found to be lacking in structural rigidity. Strengthening members were welded to the floor pan panels under the front doors, which solved the problem. Production of the Hebmüller began in June 1949.
Here’s what the final production version looked like. The top was raised, which allowed room for a small “emergency” seat in the back, which could be folded down for more luggage room.
A year later, in 1949, Karmann was also asked to submit three prototypes for the four passenger cabriolet, essentially a production version of the 1938 prototype. These also required the same strengthening to compensate for the convertible body’s lack of a roof. Although the VW sedan body sat on a platform chassis, its body was very much designed to provide significant structural rigidity to the combined structure. This is a 1950 production Karmann Cabriolet, which of course has its fully-padded top sticking up in the back, a feature the Hebmüller avoided, since it had plenty of room to drop its smaller top down behind the rear seat.
Hebmüller production started in June of 1949. But already in July of that year, a fire broke out in the Hebmüller shops. The company managed to get some production restarted, but was crippled financially because it was uninsured. Production at Hebmüller ended in mid-1950, but some more of them (Type 14A) were later built at the Karmann shops, on a very small scale through 1953. A total of 696 Hebmüllers were built.
Nathan caught this one out on drive in London, in a shot that includes quite a range of mobility options: pedestrians, bicycle. scooter and bus, along with the Heb. I know which one I’d take.
The Heb’s distinctive long engine lid may look like its front trunk lid, but they’re not the same. Under it putters the same 25 hp 1131 cc air cooled boxer four that came from the WW2 Kübelwagen and also used in the sedans. its performance was considered on the lively side for the times, but there were already tuners ready to hop it up with twin carb kits and other goodies if you wanted Porsche-like performance.
I noticed that this Heb does not have a correct single-outlet exhaust system; it has the twin-outlet muffler that was first used in 1955. Nathan titled these shots “1961 VW”. I wondered why. I decided to look up the plates and they say: “1961 VW 1200”. Hmm. So more than likely this is a very well done re-creation. I also noticed a few other very minor details, like the door handles being apparently slightly further forward that those on a genuine Heb. Also, the seats do rather look like they’re straight out of a 1961 VW.
So I’m betting it’s a well-done reproduction. Nothing wrong with that; I’ve lusted after a Heb for many decades, and I’d be very happy with this one.
Related reading:
Curbside Classic: 1946 Volkswagen 1100 (Type 11): The Beetle Crawls Out Of The Rubble
CC Outtake: 1971 VW Cabriolet – Can I Take It Hiking?
It wouldnt be too difficult to fake one, but it doesnt matter it looks ok and there are thousands of tribute/fake all kinds of cars about, the problems begin when something fake is passed off as genuine when sold.
Problem when having a car like this is that people always wonder: is it a real one? Takes away something of the joy of owning one.
But it looks so much better than the regular convertible with the huge hood folded at the back. I am not a fan of beetles but I could live with one of these.
I’d argue that a well done fake is a nice car to own. Don’t have quite the same worries about putting alot of miles on a $125K car. Don’t have quite the same worries about it being stolen or bumped in the city.
I’m picky though – don’t want a cartoon version of a Heb, I want it to be as real as possible.
The dashboard is early 50s, not ’61. A lot of the body structure connects to the dash, including the underside of the front compartment. It would be very tricky to switch the two types.
That’s been done numerous times.
Nice catch, be it real or repro. I don’t think it’ll suffer from the “it’s a fake” complex that Cobra owners get, since 99% of the world has no idea what a Hebmuller is anyway.
Thanks for this little bit of education to go along with my coffee this morning. If I had ever heard of these I had long forgotten about them. I am a little less enthusiastic about their looks than some prior commenters, but then perhaps that is because I have become so used to the proportions of the Karmann-built cabriolet.
This is a design I could spend quite a lot of time poring over – there is a lot to take in here.
Of course I have no way of knowing if it is a fake or a real one, but we should not eliminate the possibility that it is a restoration of a badly degraded or incomplete original that required a little legal chicanery to get registered. Also, 1961 is one careless bureaucratic keystroke away from 1951 – another possibility that should not be dismissed.
I have a funny story connected with bureaucratic keystrokes. When I was a student in Germany, registering as required by federal law, my German was non-existent at the time. The bureaucrat registering me refused to believe my birthdate when I told them what it was in German. When I recieved my card for review before printing – I pointed out the error. The official said in English, “You are wrong. You cannot be that age. You are 25 years old, not 35. You spoke the wrong year because you do not know Deutsch.”
I didn’t argue because that just isn’t done in Germany. So – I was officially a decade younger while living in Germany and attending university there! It also gave me full student coverage as a result – which being a poor college student, was a great bureaucratic mistake in my favor. Danke sehr Herr Registrierenbuerooffizier!
1961 is one careless bureaucratic keystroke away from 1951
It’s officially titled as a “1961 VW 1200”. “1200” is one more keystroke away from “1100”, which is what the genuine Hebmullers had, in terms of engine capacity. Two key keystroke mistakes? Both the year and the engine displacement, which would/might have affected its taxation? Hmm.
I’m going with fake. Yes it has the early dash, but it could be a early body on a ’61 pan, since thats where the VIN # is, it would be registered as such. They featured some real ones in Hot VWs magazine back in the very early ’80s, wish I would have kept them.
Very interesting history!
Regarding any pictures of Col. Radclyffe’s roadster, I found the picture below that was attributed to being Radclyffe’s car. It’s hard to tell whether that’s accurate or not, though there are some differences between this and the Hebmüller prototypes (the rear engine cover vents, the license plate location), so it seems possible. Then again, it may be an early Hebmüller prototype that was later modified itself.
Also, the car below looks like the same car as in the “top-up” side profile picture here in this article. Could go either way, I suppose.
When I Googled “Radclyffe Roadster” I got images for the two B/W ones I used in my post.Turns out they were Hebmuller prototypes, and I’m quite sure this one is one of them too, as it has all the same details. But…it’s possible that the Hebmuller prototypes were essentially the same as the Radclyffe Roadster.
thesamba.com is the go-to forum for the best VW history, and their Hebmuller postings, including period articles on it, all lacked images of the Radclyffe Roadster. Maybe Col. Radclyffe experienced terminal oversteer out on one of his spirited drives? 🙂
I have deja vu when I stare at the picture above. Now I know why, ’36 Ford 3 window coupe.
I wish I could say I’m attracted to this convertible – but the Beetle Cabriolet sold by the millions is partly adorable because it looks like a big pram. The “Heb” doesn’t look like that.
Finally, Paul – is it true that Henry Ford II could have bought VW for $1? I have read that and I would like an expert’s confirmation or clarification on that, please. Many thanks!
It is essentially true that Ford (and British companies) were offered the tooling and rights to the VW factory for the taking, so yes, maybe a token $1 might have changed hands, or not, had it been consummated.
Ford’s guys didn’t like the VW, and neither did the Brits. Too weird. It’ll never sell in the huge quantities that the factory was set up to produce.
It’s hard to say how the VW would have fared in the US built by Ford right after the war. Old Henry might have loved it and pushed it, but Ford’s new “Whiz Kids” were after something very different: all new and very design-oriented product. The VW already looked too old fashioned.
As to the Brits, they were very chauvinistic when several motor industry reps tested it and took them apart. NIHS (“Not Invented Here Syndrome”). Too different; not to our tastes.
In reality, what all the European manufacturers wanted was for the VW factory to die and have the tooling be scrapped, as this was a huge threat to them. The VW factory was designed to build 1+ million vars per year, vastly more than any other in Europe. It was going to be bigger than Ford’s Rouge, when it was fully built out, as originally envisioned.
That kind of volume meant huge efficiencies, which was a big threat to all the European car makers. And as it turned out, they were of course right! VW went on to steamroller the European industry, and became the world’s biggest car maker. Hitler’s dream of outdoing Henry Ford became a reality!
Wow!
Thanks!
Doesn’t anyone watch Bitchin’ Rides? Kindig did one last year. Can’t remember for sure if it was real or clone, but I think it was real.
I most certainly hope that isn’t a real one, with those horrible oversize aftermarket wheels. That would be a desecration of the highest order.
Lots of fake Hebs have been built for decades.
I can’t remember specifically, but I do recall a comment that it would be fun to cut up a real one just to aggravate purists.
I remember a lot of metal work in the back, massaging a vintage front lid to make the rear, so I’m saying it was a clone but I could be wrong.
No harm doing a “restomod” clone and taste is always personal opinion.
Yes, I’ve watched it. And I also remember they claimed it was the real thing.
Yep, watched it recently and loved it. It was a genuine Heb, delivered to the first owner in March 1950, and found in a barn in Germany. Some fascinating stuff on The Samba about it. The exact body number was unknown as it had been in an accident decades ago, but it was narrowed down to one of 20 different cars.
It wasn’t really a desecration as it had been previously poorly restored, including the semaphores fitted in the wrong place and the body being welded to the pan. Kindig removed and restored the original pan which is now in storage, and then restored the body (and a later pan) with some reversible modifications, so the whole thing can be put back to original if a future owner wanted. I for one think that was a great approach to take. Mind you, I love the wheels, so each to their own!
Yes the wheels are elegant and required to clear the large brakes required to stop the thing (large displacement motor installed.
I think the door handles, along with not being in the same exact position, look like newer versions. Early versiones were thinner, which can be seen in the real thing pics.
I’m not enough of a geek to know if it’s a genuine Heb or not, but it would take guts and skill to drive a 40s VW through London traffic with a crash gearbox and cable brakes.
With regard to who bought the first post war VWs it was the British Army, they ordered 20,000 on 17 September 1945, I think the Red Cross got a batch afterwards and so on, I wouldn’t think any were sold to the public whilst the army were running the factory.
I know that in the comments above you give the version of why VW wasn’t taken by Ford, or any British manufacturers, but I think there are other reason in addition why it wasn’t attractive to the British. They were trying to convert their British factories back to civilian production. These factories were bomb damaged and there were material, energy and food shortages, as well as integrating returning soldiers back into the work force. There was also pressure from the government to ‘Export or die’. I don’t think any British manufacturer would have been able to cope with taking on VW.
Wolfsburg was regarded as being close to the Inner German border as well, which I think was a problem for Ford especially.
VWs success wasn’t just the car, it was also due to the way it was sold and marketed. No British company was or would have been able to market the Beetle effectively.
It’s a real Heb on a later pan. The owner uses it as his daily driver around London, I know them both well 😉
That would explain it. Thanks.
I’d love to see a replica Heb built stock, but mid-1970s stock. Maybe starting with a 1303 Super Beetle, maybe not, but with the big bumpers, elephant-foot taillights, Lemmerz GT wheels and an appropriately ’70s color like Clementine or Viper Green metallic.
I’ve seen a few Hebmeuller (SP ?) bodies placed on various year link pin floor pans, this one looks Okay to me, too bad they couldn’t find and early seat backs, they’re *very* different and not overly comfortable .
The Sambas nice but too much B.S. there for me .
THANK YOU for posting this ! .
I nearly bought a Hebmuller in the 1970’s, even then it was a $2,000.00 car complete but very tired .
-Nate
Hebmuller conversion kits have been around for a long time http://www.bgwspectre.com/convertablerods.html still list one and there was a company in the UK as well so it’s more likely that this is a newer Beetle with a kit fitted at some time in the past.
There was a 6-page article in the September 1961 issue of Foreign Car Guide on switching a 1949 Hebmueller (I can’t do umlauts) body onto a 1955 pan that formerly had borne a folding top sedan body. The owner so wanted the performance of a 36 hp engine, with synchromesh and hydraulic brakes that originality apparently meant little to him. De gustibus, etc.
Anyone that wants a Heb can have one… A very, very close to real one.
https://www.hebmueller-registry.com/reproduction-parts.html
If my fun car budget could handle the cost I’d do it in a second.
The black car in London is the real deal but.. in the past, it lost the original chassis as with many hebmullers, Cable brakes, 25 hp was trashed in the late 50s early 60s to get juice brakes and 36 or 40 hp engines, synch gearbox etc.. The body nr was also lost in the past as someone replaced the whole front after an accident.. In that time, no body took attention to keep the nr, the plates or history. So it was a long time ago. The heb was found in Germany and painted in blue.. some years ago, it was restored, got a correct front clip with split dash . Unfortunatly.. the origine of the heb was lost for ever. The pict on top with top closed is the Radclyffe roadster. You can find more info Here: https://www.hebmueller-registry.com/registry.html