Here’s a vehicle that’s never seen on the pages of CC but will finally have its day of fame here, thanks to one being for sale here in Eugene, no less. We’ve had numerous articles on the other British “Jeep”, the Land Rover, but unknown to me—and perhaps you—there was another one, the Austin Champ.
Why is it so relatively rare and almost unknown, compared to the LR? Because of a common issue that has plagued so many military vehicles—it was too expensive; costing twice as much as the LR. Why? For one thing, it had a fully independent suspension front and rear utilizing double wishbones, designed no less than by Alec Issigonis. There were some others too.
The British Army wanted a better Jeep in the late 1940s, one that could operate in a wider range of conditions and presumably with a better ride than the buckboard Jeep. Development began in 1947 by the Nuffield organization. It took a few years of refinement, and after 30 prototypes built by Wolseley, Austin won the contract to build them, in a former WW2 airplane factory.
There were two primary variants: the basic version, known as “1/4 ton Cargo Truck” and the “Fitted For Wireless” (FFW) version, which had a larger generator and other changes to support radio equipment.
The engine is a 2.8 L four cylinder version of the Rolls-Royce B range engine family, which also included inline six and eight cylinder versions, all using a maximum number of shared parts. These were F-head engines (overhead intake, side valve exhaust), as were the later versions of Willys Hurricane four. Power was rated at 80 hp.
Given the dual belt pulleys on the generator, I’m guessing this was one of the FFW versions. The fuel and electrical systems were all designed to operate under water, as the Champ could ford in up to 6′ of water.
The initial batch of engines were built by R-R, and then by Austin, who bought a license to do so. Austin planned a civilian version, but its high price made it DOA, with some 500 built, all exported. To Oregon, perhaps?
Here’s a look at the front suspension, which used torsion bars front and rear. The Champ used a cruciform frame (X Frame), which did not allow room for the usual transfer case to be located midships. So the fully-synchronized five speed transmission (not cheap, undoubtedly) fed the rear differential, which incorporated both a rear gear as well as a return driveshaft to the front axle. That allowed five gears in reverse, FWIW.
The rear end. Presumably the front and rear suspensions were identical. The suspension worked extremely well, giving the Champ superb off-road capabilities.
The body was open, a four seat tub built out of steel by the Pressed Steel Company. A PVC top and side curtains were available, for weather protection. The Land Rover’s enclosed body alone made it more appealing to its actual users.
The Champs vastly higher cost and the reduction in the Army in the early 1950s resulted in a reduced contract, with only 11,000 of the planned 15,000 being built. Most were soon redeployed to the Territorial Army, and by the mid-60s, it was phased out from the military entirely. Not exactly a glorious career.
As to this Champ, it’s being offered for $1,450, which includes these spare parts. The seller says the engine “is not seized and complete” but “does not run”. And there’s no title either. But none of that should keep you from saving this rare British relic from an ignoble future.
Thanks Paul, I knew of the Champ, but I’ve learnt some more about it. I have a recollection about them being sensitive to propeller shaft greasing?
If memory serves, they were used by the Australian Army too.
The Champ’s Reward came later.
Something I might add here, may be a bit off topic, but military products are expensive. I worked for Sig Sauer Electro-Optics here in Wilsonville, and not only were the products extremely cool, they were stupid expensive, and you can’t buy them. They are for military and law enforcement only. Even the rejects had to be destroyed on site.
And destroying the rejects was under strict ATF guidelines.
These can be picked up quite cheap here in the Netherlands if you are lucky. I was, about 11 years ago, when I bought a running Champ for about the same kind of money as the Oregon one. A friend also bought one at the same time, we wanted to go to the big event in the UK 10 years ago – celebrating 70 years of Champs (or something like that). We arrived with a nice touch being the last to arrive and meeting the goal of the event: trying to get 100 Champs on the field. We were number 99 and 100. Our Champs were the most scruffy ones, all others were in like pristine condition.
I have done some off-road events and it sure is very good off road. What makes the Champ so liveable is the comfort – independent all round with torsion bars. Even off road the speed can be much higher than any Landrover of Jeep. A Landrover is much more cramped for a driver as well. The big engine of the Champ is great, lots of torque low down.
Of course the Champ is a loser for many. Too expensive and too refined for the military, too heavy as well. But try one now with a Series 1 Land Rover of early 50s Jeep and you will be surprised.
Nga Taonga Sound and Vision, the NZ National Film Archive, has this charming 1954 mini-documentary full colour ad epic filmed in the Otago high country by the Dunedin Austin dealer Alex Black. Title: “Austin of England Presents – The Austin Champ in New Zealand. Austin Champ farm utility…” It makes a persuasive case,
https://www.ngataonga.org.nz/collections/catalogue/catalogue-item?record_id=103275
Nice write up. I do have a soft spot for the Champ, much more of a tough looking truck than a Landie. You should do a CC on it’s baby brother replacement, the Gypsy. Although a civilian truck, fleets of them were held in reserve by the Auxiliary Fire Service alongside the Green Goddess pumps for post nuclear attack use until the 80s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Gipsy
https://austingipsy.net
I was going to mention the Gipsy but too late we have seen that before briefly I learned to drive in one of the last versions very capable vehicles and arguably better than a Landrover in some conditions like on road and the ability to shift to and from 4WD on the fly, 2,2 litre 4 banger A70 engines which were bullet proof the larger 6 cylinder C series bolts in if more power is required.
Like many obscure (in the US) and usually British vehicles, I was very familiar with this one as a child, in 1/43rd scale Dinky Toy form.
Yes I have the Dinky Toy as well, which probably had a higher production than the actual vehicle. It was perplexing to me because I never saw an Austin Champ in 1970’s Canada.
Actually this example looks to be in the same condition as my Dinky Toy. Remove a couple of tires and they would look identical.
I’m having trouble understanding the drivetrain. If I’m reading the text correctly, the rear differential has a 1:1 output shaft that feeds the front differential. Okay, that’s one way to skin a cat, sure. But I can not for the life of me figure out how that results in 5 reverse gears. Can someone help me figure out what I’m missing, please?
The gearbox had five ratios; the drive was then taken to a combined transfer box and differential assembly which incorporated reverse gear, thereby allowing five reverse gears also, and then by a long shaft to the front differential which incorporated a simple dog clutch to enable four-wheel drive when required.
Does that explain it better?
It absolutely does explain it! Thank you, Paul! I somehow missed the part where the transfer box/differential contained the reversing mechanism, and assumed reverse gear was in the transmission. Now it all makes sense.
Wow ;
Another rarity well covered .
At this price I hope it’s not picked up by someone who doesn’t grasp the reality of the job ahead .
-Nate
Austin must have been gutted to see a U.S. company that previously made Austins built under license and Austin underpinned small cars as American Bantam go on to produce the original Jeep prototype.
It is easy to see a wartime Austin built Jeep powered by an earlier BS1 4-cylinder that would find its way into the post-war Austin 16 hp, Austin Gipsy and other models.
nah. This oddity could never ever beat a Willys.
It even looks overweight and unproportional.
In the late 60s my best friend decided he wanted ( and could afford ) a Champ. Exchange and Mart was the periodical of the moment to find things for sale, and there was an ad for somebody dealing. Three of us set of for a very fine house in the country where the owner took us for a spin, and a deal was subsequently done. Obviously all Champs were ex-army and some had lead harder lives than others. There was normally a vertical exhaust next to the windscreen, on the left. There was a hinged flap on top to prevent water ingress, and at tickover the flap lifted briefly as each cylinder fired. If you met a Champ coming the other way, you didn’t just wave, you stopped and had a chat.
I’m very disappointed to learn that the engine was built by Austin rather than RR…..
The jerry can on the rear looks exactly like the one I have in my garage. I’ve always assumed it was American, but perhaps it’s British surplus.
Would it be entirely out of place (i.e., irrelevant) to comment on the “styling” of this intriguing vehicle ? The front end and front fenders of course is an homage to Willys—par for the course in this segment—but what accounts for the utterly dissimilar rear wheel arch ? Of course the example Paul found has mismatched wheels, too, completing the apparent absurdity.
The rejoinder might be that an effort was made to unite the front and rear halves of the animal via similar curvature of hood (bonnet) and beltline above the rear wheel—but for me this isn’t enough by far to compensate for the above-mentioned mismatch. Oh, well—I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that it was the appearance of the thing that doomed it; the story clearly has another ending, according to reporting here. Thanks for bringing this one to our attention, Paul !
About 1985 I was buying vintage Rolls-Royces on the cheap, as the British Pound had suddenly dropped 50% to almost equal the US Dollar. [PS1 to 1.05$]. I had purchased a couple of late 1940s Silver Wraith saloons and they were packed into a single 40 ft shipping container. The guy I had been dealing with in my multiple purchases [I had bought a half dozen cars from him] said he was including a little surprise gift for me, as there was room left over in the container.
Sure enough, on getting the paperwork in the mail, besides the 2 Wraiths was British papers for an Austin. When we opened up the container, wedged up into the area behind one of the Wraiths and the container doors, was a very decent Champ. They actually built a wooden ramp and support going over the back of the Wraith, so the champ was wedged in at about a 45 degree angle, engine pointed down, and the rear of the Champ almost reaching the interior roof of the container!
With great care we slowly pulled the Champ out, then the 2 Wraiths. Charging the battery the Champ started right up. At first it’s engine was very smokey, but we quickly realized it was from the crankcase oil seeping past the rings, due to the angle it was stored in during shipping. What surprised all my mechanics was the Champ engine’s front crank seal hadn’t leaked a drop of oil! So I’m not surprised to hear the vehicle could handle driving in 6 ft of water.
We played around with the Champ for a while, even staging a 3-way drag race with a 1950s US Army Jeep, a West German DKW Munga 4X4, and the Champ! Jeep came in 1st, Champ 2nd, Munga 3rd. The race happened across a grassy field in front of my shop, and we tore up a lot of sod with three 4WD vehicles racing! Ended up trading the Champ for a nice 1951 Dodge 4X4 civilian Power Wagon with original front winch.
It looks like Suzuki took a lot of inspiration from the Champ for the design of their early LJs: the corrugated panels, the the vents on the hood, front grille, etc . I always thought how original the design of the LJ looked. I was wrong, and now I’m glad I learnt something new!
A couple others have mentioned the Gipsy. This one showed up at the Gilmore’s Brit show a few years ago.
Still pretty utilitarian inside.