(first posted 8/17/2013) Following a decent 14,634 unit run of the Austin-Healey 100 from 1953–56, Leonard Lord, the Managing Director of Austin, asked Donald Healey to design an affordable, small engined sports car — the 100 and Nash-Healey sports car that preceded it both being a bit pricey for the general market. The Austin-Healey 100 had marked the start of a twenty year relationship between Austin and the British Motor Company (BMC), and the Sprite (all Marks included) would go on to sell nearly 130,000 units from 1958–71.
The Sprite was styled by Garry Coker and Les Ireland (some sources mention a G. Jones, Chief Experimental Engineer and A. H. Moore, Chief Car Designer as having been instrumental in the car’s design), and was originally intended to have retractable headlights that would fold back flat with the bonnet when not in use. Certainly the most distinctive aspect of the design, the “bug eye” (or “frog eye” for those in the U.K.) headlights were a happy accident of cost reduction, the linkage and mechanism required being found too complex and expensive. Reviewers at the time of the Sprite’s introduction panned the look, but it quickly became a big part of the car’s appeal. Many a complaint was lodged when the Mark II Sprite integrated the headlights into the wings.
After two years of development, the Austin-Healey Sprite debuted in May of 1958 with a price tag of £455 (£679 with tax); the US import price was $1,795. For comparison, an MGA would set an American buyer back an additional $700, or almost $1,000 more if one desired a Triumph TR3A. Or, for something we might better relate to, a new 1958 VW Type I “Beetle” cost about $1,500.
The four-cylinder engine selected for the Sprite dated to 1951 and was used in both the Austin A35 and Morris Minor 1000. Displacement was 57 c.i.d (948cc) and all of 42-1/2 hp @ 5,000rpm and 52 ft. lb. torque were on tap – the only “tuning” done for the Sprite application was the use of stronger valve springs and the fitting of dual S.U. updraught carburetors. To the delight of many, the engine could be warmed up quite nicely with a selection of parts both from the manufacturer and the aftermarket – power in the neighborhood of 70hp was achievable through various upgrades, including an aftermarket Shorrock supercharger. The ubiquitous BMC A-series gearbox was fitted, providing four forward gears, the top three being synchronized. Reviewers of the day complained about the “indifferent” gear spacing, but praised the smoothness of the shift, especially after broken in. A top speed of 80mph in stock trim was possible, with 0-50 mph times of 14.1 seconds (0-60 in ~20) being recorded.
The Sprite was the first sports car ever mass-produced with a unitized body. The suspension was designed by Barry Bilbie of Healey and patterned after the system employed on the Jaguar D Type. It was not, however, a fully monocoque design, as the forward suspension and engine were carried on front “legs,” with the hinged front bonnet carrying no suspension loads at all. Since Healey’s relationship with BMC gave access to the combined parts bins of Austin, Morris, MG, Riley and Wolseley, the development team was able to pick and choose from a wide array of components with minimal development expense. The Minor donated its rear brakes, rack & pinion steering and front wishbone suspension to the effort while the A35/40 offered its rear axle and front brakes. Ride characteristics were understandably a bit harsh, but reviewers almost universally praised the light and quick steering and flat cornering capabilities.
To save cost, such niceties as exterior door handles, roll-up glass side-lites and a boot lid were summarily dispensed with. A spare tire was fitted under the rear deck, with access through the cabin by folding the seats forward and then leaving the job of retrieving the spare to a “trained monkey,” as one reviewer put it. Access to the engine end of the car, on the other hand, was superb due to the whole bonnet and wings raising together as one.
In addition to engine and suspension upgrades, various other accessories were available including the hard top our subject car is sporting. Jensen was first to offer a hard top for the Sprite (in 1959), but sources indicate these were only offered in white, so unless this unit has been repainted at least twice, it’s likely from another source. Interestingly, replacement bonnets with retractable headlights were offered in the aftermarket – ostensibly to correct the “wrong” of the fixed lamps, but these proved unpopular and few were sold.
Sprites, unfortunately, were deficient in the area of corrosion prevention, and are known to be “furious rusters.” As this car shows less than 3″ between the tops of the rear tires and fender opening, it’s quite likely the mounting boxes for the rear leaf springs are rotting out allowing the rear end to sag. You don’t need eagle eyes to spot the other creeping rust issues this car has, and yet, the patina only seems to add to the charm of its happy, smiling face.
As a brief aside, I photographed this car in front of an old storefront in the older part of downtown Peoria, Illinois, which is probably deserving of an “Other Side of the Curb” essay.
There was quite the quirky collection of car and bike parts on display in window, and a bit of a yellow something-or-other hiding in the background.
I was quite drawn to both the car and the storefront – they share a certain eccentricity that appeals to me!
So in closing, I’ll quote a review of the Sprite from the August 1958 issue of Motor Sport magazine:
“The Austin-Healey Sprite will prove extremely popular, we predict, amongst those greying old men (like the Editor?) who no longer drive fantastically fast but who fancy a sports car that handles well and is thus a good safe introduction to faster stuff and those who want a lightweight vehicle with a B.M .C. engine they can tune to great speeds. And, of course, amongst those who merely want an inexpensive boy’s-racer.”
With the Austin-Healey Sprite, Donald Healey indeed succeeded in creating a true “sports car for the masses.” Good-O!
A sizable collection of period scanned magazine articles and reviews of the Sprite can be seen at www.spridgetguru.com.
My first love 🙂
That’s a nice friendly face compared to the angry 59 Dodge.
Thanks. Learned something new – that a squab is the backrest of a seat.
It’s amazing that with no bumpers, none of the lower lights at each end are broken. Would this Sprite originally have had bumpers, or was that another cost reduction?
The original bumpers are missing from this example.
This used to be on my top 5 affordable sports car lists. Now that I’m older and have minimal garage space, lots of bills and too much sensibility, I can’t imagine buying one.
However, one of the guys that I play soccer with regularly shows up in a bugeye Sprite. It’s mechanically sound, no rust and just needs paint. If I got a chance to drive it, it may end up on my top 5 again. Maybe it’s better that I don’t drive it? 🙂
Good find.
I just love how these look with the hood open.
Don’t you mean bonnet? 🙂
Reminds me of Hungry Hungry Hippos 🙂
The stuff in the store windows is pretty interesting. I’m guessing that’s an MG Midget fender, and I would love to get my hands on that old radio– it looks like a Philco from the early 1930’s. As for the Healey itself, the missing bumpers really accentuate the already happy-looking face. That rusty little bugeye reminds me a bit of a happy drunk.
Cool little car and not something seen much anymore, Yep those quarter elliptic springs are its main problem the mountings disolve, I once looked at buying one but a check underneath meant walk away, its quite a mission to rebuild the spring mounts.
Sagging rear? Don’t worry little Sprite, there is an add for a Brazilian Butt Lift on this page! 😛 (FYI I understand they pay the bills, I’m just being a wise guy.)
So…how does one open the door without door handles? This car appears to have glass side windows, so unbuttoning the plastic side windows wouldn’t work.
The door glass (more likely plexi or poly) slides open to acess the door pull.
A few issues here. SU carburettors were never downdraught. The quarter elliptic rear springs were not shared with any other BMC models. I think the only Morris parts were the rear brakes, as the A35 and A40 Austins used mechanical rear brakes ( brake-by-wire), and the steering rack. The front bumper was an optional extra, as were wire wheels.
A friend had a well used one back in the 60’s which I had the chance to drive briefly. First gear was “broken” but second was very low on this box, so you used it as a 3-speed. Lots of fun, as long as you didn’t drop through the rusty floor. They look much too small if you see one today.
You’re absolutely correct on the S.U.s – typo on my part. My brain knew they were updraft, but that’s not what made it to my fingers!
As for the rear suspension, one of the sources indicated the borrowing of the leaf springs, but as always, firsthand knowledge trumps secondhand reviews! I’ve removed that reference.
Thanks for the corrections…
Actually, they’re side-drafts. Strictly speaking, they’re mostly side-draft, with a little down-draft for good measure, as most of them were mounted with a slight up-ward angle.
Now I’m *really* confused! (c:
I learned a lot from this article thanks Ed. I never realized the hood opened that way, I always thought it opened like it does on the Jag XKE.
Some do open like an XKE.
There were kits to make the bonnet open the other way. Service with the rear-hinged bonnet were done on the knees, AKA, the “prayer bones”.
What a cheerful-looking car, just the thing for the go-go ’60s! So I suppose we shouldn’t be too hard on the current clown-faced Mazdas.☺
The proportion and style of Bug Eyes are still easy on eye after so many decades. When Lotus Elan and Bug eyes make a baby together, they produced the original Miata.
It would be cool if someone would to make a modern Bugeye. 7 inches wider and proportionally longer, a lightweight engine 160hp or so.
I remember seeing a very rusty British Racing Green one driven by a dapper looking gentleman with a goatee beard and cravat and his glamourous blonde girlfriend.They bought a later model with the lights in the wings which lacked the character of the original to me
A friend’s dad had one in the early ’70’s. It rusted away and he got rid of it, but kept the hard top. When he built a combination bathroom/laundry room in their basement, he put in a concrete block shower and used the Sprite’s roof as a top for it. My friend’s dad passed away several years ago, and next time I see my friend I’ll have to ask him if that old hard top is still there. His mom still lives in the same house – I wouldn’t be surprised at all.
An excellent treatment of a really cool car. I have seen these off and on over the years, and in a reverse CC effect, just saw one out on the road a couple of weeks ago, for the first time in ages.
It occurs to me that the name is just perfect for this car. Its looks, its performance, and its personality seem to be captured in its name. Ask the uninitiated to describe what a car called a Sprite would be, and they would describe a car very much like this one.
A guy who attended our small-town rural high school from a neighboring town used to drive his over on nice days in the spring and fall in the mid-’60’s. (His younger brother was later years seen driving a black ’62 bubbletop Bel Air, some families just know their cars.) It was green, like the top in the pictured car, and totally different from anything any of us had ever seen or heard. There were the usual jokes, and the basketball team would often lift it up and put it on the sidewalk during lunch hour. But he would just drive it off and away, making the distinctive BMC 4-cylinder sound that I can still remember, ripping around the corners in town in a way that made some of us wonder, hmm, maybe there is more to cars than just burning rubber, 0-60 times and glass pack mufflers. Maybe that’s where my love of little cars began-thanks, Ed!
This is one of those cars that’s hard to dislike even if it’s not your sort of thing — sort of the automotive equivalent of a Welsh corgi puppy. (“I don’t even really like dogs, but I guess we can throw the ball a few times…”)
+1 2 seat sports cars aren’t my cup of tea which is a good thing as I’m not built for them but it’s tiny size and friendly face make it cute
+2
Cool little car, but I have to ask, Ed: Did you get any pictures of that two-tone Airflyte hiding in the background?
Stay tuned, Tom! (c:
I’m still tuned in, Ed…ever get a chance to write that beauty up?
Yeah, yeah… well, I still have the pics and a story hook idea, so I guess I need to get ‘er done!
One might suggest that the stylistic inspiration for the Bug Eye Sprite (aka Frog Eye) was the 1950-1952 Crosley Hot Shot Super Sport whose specifications included a relatively advance four cylinder Iron Block bevel shaft driven Single Overhead Camshaft design (CIBA), four wheel caliper disc brakes, innovative post war slab sided styling, and “cute” protruding hood set headlamps and absence of rear luggage compartment door opening.
Who knew? Inspiring design similarities appearing across the Atlantic in the later Austin Healey Bug Eye Sprite, several years after the Crosley Super Sport had disappeared into the now almost lost, dusty annals of automotive history.
Isn`t this the car the ‘Geico Gekko’ drives in those commercials? Cool!
My brother bought a Sprite once for $50. Never put it on the road. Made a few dollars on it. More like a go-cart than an automobile with an 80 inch wheelbase.
I remember an episode of The Wonder Years where the kid was given a deal one of these by a used car dealer in exchange for dating his daughter, or something.
Both the relationship and the car were short-lived.