The ‘80s may now be regarded as the decade of square car design par excellence, but it was arguably the third such era in automotive history. Back in the ‘20s, cars were pretty straight-edged (barring the fenders, of course). Things got all swoopy when streamlining became a thing in the ‘30s, but by the late ‘50s, curves were starting to become passé. The second age of the square car came in full force in the early ‘60s and this little Simca is a great example of this philosophy being applied to a smaller car.
This is not to inply that all cars of this era were of the cubic persuasion. That’s what was great about the ‘60s: the variety of shapes was truly awe-inspiring. Lots of us gearheads deplore the fact that current designs all seem to look alike, but let’s be real: that was pretty much the same thing in the ‘80s, the ‘40s or the ‘20s. Cars designed in the ‘60s, on the other hand, were a more varied bunch.
I mean, have a look just at some of the Simca 1000’s contemporaries – in that same circa 1-litre subcompact segment – from Europe and Japan. There are a few that have a pretty squarish look, but that’s not the majority.
Same deal with the technical side: rear-engine, FWD and traditional layout were all represented. This was not the case back in the ‘20s, and it’s not really today either. Twin cylinder motors were also present in decent numbers, as was air-cooling.
None of that for the Simca, though: we have a 944cc water-cooled OHV 4-cyl. mated to a 4-speed manual and providing 52hp (SAE) – pretty conventional by any standard. It lives in the back though, which was an interesting choice on the part of the Poissy engineers: this was Simca’s first rear-engined car (launched for the 1962 model year) and they were relatively late in the game to join the likes of VW, Renault or Fiat.
Cube-wise, the Simca 1000 is a highly efficient use of a limited amount of space. Within a wheelbase of only 222cm (87.5’’), they managed to provide enough space for four adult passengers, each with their own door and fully wind-downable window and a floor free of any transmission hump.
The challenge was to turn this boxy little four-door into something appealing. Renault designers famously struggled with this task when drafting the R8 and had to resort to ask hired gun Philippe Charbonneaux for a last-minute rescue operation. The folks at Simca managed it quite well, without having to slap on too much chrome trim or unnecessary creases.
The 1000 had a long career, making it all the way to MY 1978. The body panels did not change much throughout this 17-year run, but they did manage to make it more cubic somehow by making the rear lights squarish in 1969. The front ones went rectangular for the final couple of model years on either side of a large plastic dummy grille, also eliminating the “eyebrows” pressed into the hood. These modifications took the cubic design over the edge, in my opinion. The ‘60s cars, as evidenced by the one I caught in Tokyo, had more personality.
There are a number of oddities on this particular car, but it’s certainly an earlier model, when Simca were still a force to be reckoned with on the European market. Chrysler already had a stake in the French carmaker, even as Fiat started pulling their funds out, but the rash of Pentastars that would festoon Simcas from the late ‘60s had yet to take over from the stylized swallow emblem seen on Simcas since the ‘30s.
Close to two million Simca 1000s were made, but its manufacturer sure changed for the worst during its lengthy reign. When the 1000 premiered at the 1961 Paris Motor Show, Simca was the second-largest French carmaker behind Renault. By the end of the 1000 in May 1978, the marque was at death’s door, as its owner Chrysler was about to literally give it away to Peugeot. Thankfully, the Simca 1000 was spared the ignominy of being rebranded as a Talbot.
Dating this specific 1000 was a bit difficult, as there are a number of details that look off. The dummy grille should be entirely in polished aluminium, not black, but I suppose this gives it a sportier look. The GLS badge up front is correct, but the red one on the rear end came off a ‘70s model.
That C-pillar star is a 1965-66 GLS trim piece, to be sure. But then again, it’s not a huge job to source those and stick them on.
The plot thickens inside. That instrument binnacle is obviously aftermarket (the VDO dials are labelled in Italian, for some reason), but the dash itself is pre-1966, when the 1000 got a completely flat light gray one. This, along with a number of other details such as the lack of quaterlights, should indicate a ’65 model. It also says “GL,” as opposed to GLS, under the glovebox. Ah well…
Not that it matters, in the end. There really aren’t many French classics to be found in Tokyo, apart from the (very) odd Citroën. Just catching a Simca is a rare enough occurrence these days to be worthy of a large smile and a quick CC post.
Related posts:
Curbside Classic: Simca 1000 – The Franco-Italian Baby Corvair, by PN
COAL: 1964 Simca 1000 – Big Car and Little Car, by Jeff Sun
The underhood view is fascinating. Offcenter radiator is more like Fiat than Renault. What’s with the two plenums on the hood? The left one seems to lead to the passenger compartment and the right one seems to be closed off. Guess I’ll have to look it up.
The Simca 1000 was originally a concept by Fiat to replace the 600, it has a lot of Fiat DNA.
The Fiat bones are well-hidden, though. The body, the engine and the transmission were all developed by Simca themselves. Only the suspension was inherited from the Fiat 600.
Love the detailing, on such a small car. The interior shot looks great. Must have been a significant influence on the Fiat 128.
Wing’s and Fins , were the “in’s ,” in the 50’s .
I’m pretty sure the rear lights are shared with their (RWD) 1300 but with a slightly different mounting without the body coloured ‘collar’. The screws between the amber and red parts are certainly in the same place.
Maybe it’s just me, but a fun post would be a virtual car show featuring the variety of subcompacts in this class in the 1960s. I can identify perhaps two-thirds of the ones you’ve featured, but they all look cool.
Fascinating collage of small French and Italian three-box cars, particularly relative to the German Beetle and English Mini.
top row: Fiat 850, Daihatsu Compagno, Hillman Imp
middle: Datsun 410 Bluebird, Vauxhall Viva, Panhard 24B
bottom: Hino Contessa, Lancia Fulvia, Skoda 1000MB
Top row: Austin 1100, Citroen Ami 6, Toyota Publica
middle: Mazda Familia, Daf 44, Suzuki Fronte
bottom: NSU Prinz, Renault 8, Mitsubishi Colt 800
It would be a cool idea for a post, true. Lots to be compared, as there are a few more that could be added, too: Opel Kadett A, Subaru 1000, Autobianchi Primula… Plus, one might need to add the older designs that I left out but were still in production in the mid-60s, e.g. Saab, DKW Junior, Ford Anglia, Morris Minor…
Wonderful little car! The wheelbase is over 6” shorter than that of our 2-door Wrangler JK and about an inch less than a 2010s Fiat 500…
Your last photo solicits one of my enduring memories of the Simca 1000 we had when I was a kid. I loved that push button release to open the engine compartment. I’m not sure why I fixated on that feature, but the memory is strong with that.
It’s always quite something to see picture of one of these that still exists on the road. I probably haven’t seen one in the metal this century. Nevertheless, I find this one in your story to be a bit too shiny for my taste. To each their own, but the level of polish given to this little car makes it look more like a toy than an actual vehicle. And I agree, that front faux-grill is just all wrong in black. Same goes for the vinyl lettering on the rear fender(s).
I’d be glad to have this one…and scuff it up a little so that it looks like how I remember them. 🙂
Oh, one more thing cool about seeing this post…the engine compartment picture reminds me of another fascinating (to the 6 year old I was at the time) feature on this car. That’s the writing on the air cleaner snorkel. I believe that says “Winter” and “Summer”. In my household, we never could figure out whether flipping that flap made any difference…but that one should have a manual choice, now THAT was the amazing thing.
These Simca 1000 were everywhere in the Netherlands in the 70s and early 80s. A popular car. After the mid 80s, they disappeared fast because of rust.
Agree met what you say about early versus late. It seems that is often the case. The early examples had many different details, often nicer than later versions.
I cannot remember ever seeing one with that early grille in black.
Re space efficiency: Front seats folded down fully to create a short (?) bed, as can be seen in the Dutch advertisement pictured in Jeff Sun’s COAL of this car (listed above). Reminded me of Renault 8 ad which Paul found for us in that same COAL. Amusing, check it out, not PC today …
Wow a Simca 1000, The last one I saw of this once common car was written up many years ago on CC and actually lived in a small herd of Simcas nearby to where I lived but the CC effect has been closer lately an old mate of mine I see quite often now we are both aging worked in Simca spare parts in my home town, the Dealership under went another change and became a full Toyota dealership and flourished, prior to that it handled spare for several brands, the manager lived over back fence then.
Not a car I am familiar with outside of CC.
Nothing against the car or the brand, but the most amazing thing to me is to think that someone in Japan is so enthusiastic about this long-gone marque as to import one. In Europe, North or South America, Australia or NZ yes, but Japan? The ‘502’ plate shows this to be a recent-ish import rather then a ‘survivor’ – if indeed Simca ever sold cars in Japan.
From the comments it may be a bitza, but what an attraction among car nuts!
We did not get a lot of Simcas in Canada as Chrysler tended to look to Rootes when it needed an import for Canada, thus no Opels or Simcas. It is good to read a history of the model as I always get them mixed up with R8s which were sold here.
A cute little thing .
Nice to see a Simca, there were not many in the 1960’s that I can remember .
-Nate
”highly efficient use of a limited amount of space”. Not sure of that : under the rear hood the spare tire could have taken place there (like a lot of European cars of the time which housed it in front with the engine).If not, make it a teardrop shape for aerodynamics but hey it would have been as beautiful as a Scion Xb with a the back of a Beetle .Ok ,the heat emitted from an engine and the rubber of a tire don’t coexist peacefully but at that time we didn’t seem to care.
https://jalopnik.com/front-mounted-spare-tires-were-a-great-bad-idea-i-cant-1846689523
What a nice interior. I and my older son just did a 800 miles round trip in our modern Fiat 500.
What a find and great to see one being so well looked after, even with the personalisation going.
Thansk T87 for the guide through the clues to the age of this example.
I saw one about a month ago in France but had no chance to take a shot, so perhaps the CC effect also works in reverse as the effect CC?