(first posted 7/2/2012) The Land Rover series of trucks are unique and beloved vehicles. Living in the Midwest, away from all the surviving LRs out West, I have next-to-no experience with them. But I do think they’re cool, and spotting one in downtown Davenport, Iowa a couple of months ago was a real treat. These vehicles, which enjoyed a long production run, essentially remain with us today as the very similar LR Defender. So then, just how did a luxury car company come up with these wildly successful 4x4s?
The truth is, that’s not exactly what they set out to do. Instead, circumstances were largely responsible for the way things turned out. You see, the Rover Company, like every other postwar British industry, was reeling. Raw materials were scarce, and what few were available went first to industries that were either rebuilding the country, or had items to export. This placed Rover, a maker of conservative luxury saloons, in a real jam; at the time, virtually no one was splurging on a fancy car and Rover sales were miniscule. Something had to be done.
Rover’s chief designer, Maurice Wilks, had an idea. He thought a light utility vehicle with off road capability, in the vein of the Willys Jeep, could build up the company’s coffers. Such a simple, multipurpose vehicle would sell much better than the P2 and P3 Rovers, right?
It probably didn’t hurt that Wilks had a surplus Jeep on his own farm–which, more than likely, was the inspiration for what would become the Land Rover.
The first Land Rover came out in 1948 and garnered immediate interest, both at home and abroad. The tough little 4×4 could take some serious abuse and get you to the middle of nowhere with little trouble.
Interestingly, Rover never intended for it to be a long-term vehicle. Their thinking was that once Great Britain (and the rest of Europe) recovered, saloon sales would pick up, thus rendering the Land Rover unnecessary. Apparently, no one thought at the time that LR sales would take off by leaps and bounds. These things sold like the proverbial hotcakes, consistently outselling the regular Rover lineup. Naturally, nobody in the Rover hierarchy was about to spite that good fortune!
Thus did the Land Rover stay. The original LR received regular changes, much like its Jeep competitor, and carried on until 1958, when the Series II came out. Between 1961 and 1985, regular updates were implemented, and further refined Series IIA and Series III models carried on in Bristol (or is that Solihull?) fashion.
With over 440,000 made, the Series III, which replaced the Series IIA in 1971, is the most common Land Rover series. Not coincidentally, it also had the longest production run, from 1971 to 1985. To once again liken it to the Jeep CJ, its basic shape remained the same over the years, even as numerous improvements were made.
Series III engines were much the same as the outgoing IIA, offering a choice of a 2.25L I4 gasoline engine with 75 horsepower, or a 2.25L diesel with 62 horses. A 2.6L straight six, introduced in ’67 on the IIA, was also available. Regardless of engine size, all Series III vehicles came equipped with a four speed manual and, of course, four-wheel drive.
Several new features graced Series III interiors: The old metal dashboard, with its center-mounted gauges a la Jeep CJ, was replaced with a padded plastic affair with a driver’s-side gauge cluster. This new, more car-like layout certainly made things more complex at the factory, which now had to build both left- and right-hand drive versions of each model.
Michael Freeman, our resident LR Series specialist (who also helped me identify our featured car as a Series III–thanks, Michael!), had some interesting information about the Series III:
When they got the new Series III in Australia they all balked at the new grill. On the Series II, the grille is metal and they used to use it for grilling. The new one on the III was plastic. No more shrimp on the LR Barby! Also many of the features of the series III were carried over from military trucks. The Salisbury rear axle, the addition of a coolant expansion tank; that idea was home-brewed by the desert raiders way back in WWII in their pink panthers. The lights on the wings were to meet minimum light spacing requirements in certain markets, like the USA.
As had been the case since the original Series I, Land Rovers sat atop one of two wheelbases. At its introduction, the SWB version rode an 88″ wheelbase and measured 132″ in length (increasing to 142.4″ by the time our featured Series III was built). Long wheelbase Land Rovers featured a 109″ wheelbase; early models were 173.5″ long. A long wheelbase pickup joined the lineup in 1954. Although the long wheelbase had been around from the start, Land Rover waited until 1956 to introduce a LWB four-door (or five-door, if you count the tailgate) Station Wagon model. There had been a Station Wagon before that, but it was a short wheelbase, two-door model with a Tickford-built body.
Later LWBs, represented by this late ’70s version shot by Cohort contributor channaher, were a bit more civilized but still all business. By this time, the overall length of LWB versions had reached 175″; their wheelbase remained unchanged.
While I was running errands one morning back in late April, I did a double take upon spotting this open-top SWB Series III. Wow, what a cool truck! In the Quad Cities, these things are about as common as a Sherman tank, so of course I had to stop for pictures.
It was not a show car, but in very solid shape. Despite having a mishmash of different vintage Land Rover parts on it, such as the Series IIA grille, it looked very original, right down to the seats and “Land Rover” mud flaps on the back. There is a British car show in Davenport every August, but I’ve never seen this truck there. A new acquisition for the owner’s fleet, perhaps? Very few Anglophiles have just one British car, you know. They’re like potato chips.
At any rate, seeing this cheery Land Rover on a hazy, overcast afternoon really brightened my day. The Series III itself finally was put out to pasture after 1985, although the Land Rover Defender, introduced in ’83, filled some of the void left by this icon. And, as attested to by this drop-top, there are plenty of them still puttering around. Even in Iowa.
When I think of Land Rover. I remember of one model featured in the South African movie “Gods must be Crazy” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t127UCrtvLw
Lol, I’d forgotten about that, it was brilliant!
Awesome write up Tom! I love the look of the 90/110/Defender – has there ever been a more utilitarian vehicle that looked so ‘right’? I think they look great, not a dud line anywhere. A LWB SIII or Defender with the Safari roof would be on my wish-list. My Dad was an Austin-Rover dealer’s merchanic here in New Zealand, and the workshop vehicle was a SII SWB hardtop. It was, noisy, uncomfortable, flat out at 85km/h, and by gosh it was awesome! Every feature, every fitting was designed for a specific purpose, and designed to last. We used it for getting firewood in the winter – there was nowhere it couldn’t go. I just bought half a dozen SII/III/Defender brochures, and the brochures are just like the Landies themselves – intelligently designed and engineered, nothing superfluous. One of my all-time most favourite vehicles! 🙂
I would also like to point one of their offspring, the Santana Aníbal, built in the south of Spain (Jaén) by Santana Motores (a factory that once built the Suzuky Jimny). It was then adquired by Iveco and sold as Iveco Massif/Campagnola (to confuse with the original italian 4×4) until last year, when the society closed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iveco_Massif
They were powered by an Iveco (Fiat) diesel engine (2.8l, I4) and they were tough and sold to many armies.
Ah, the iconic Land Rover, that world-wide symbol of adventure. I had the Matchbox toy when I was a kid. I bet I’m not the only one here who can claim that.
I still have a dinky toy Landrover trailer
I have a Corgi toy version of the Land Rover. Also have the Matchbox too.
Didn’t I see some Land Rovers in Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom? That and the balky one in the TGMBC movie are my only exposure to them.
The Land Rover station wagon was definitely Wild Kingdom gear. Jim Fowler (wearing khakis) did all the muscle work while Marlin Perkins supervised & narrated.
Unlike many modern SUV fans, they didn’t need a lift kit to navigate African wilderness.
They really ought to put the Buick aluminum V8 in those things….
They did, but not many were sold, as the fuel consumption wasn’t attractive to Landie customers.
There’s a good War Story about a G.I. seen tearing around in a Willys MB; apparently, a Ford Flathead was installed instead of the Go Devil four.
But the importance of the Jeep has been overstated by its fans; IMHO, it was vast numbers of American- & Canadian-built trucks, like the CCKW & CMP, which did more to win the War. Germany produced a mere trickle by comparison, & the Opel Blitz wasn’t even military grade.
There’s a good War Story about a G.I. seen tearing around in a Willys MB; apparently, a Ford Flathead was installed instead of the Go Devil four.
so….are you going to leave us in suspense?
Apparently the Ford built Jeeps used a Ford engine, though not the V8, rather than a Willys. Was talking to an owner of either an MB or a GPW several years ago, and he was talking about sourcing parts for the two different engines.
Ford and Willys built Jeeps ended up looking much alike as many of the bodies were made in the former Auburn plant in Connersville Indiana and a decision was made to combine the best features of both the Ford and Willys bodies into one standard design to ease production.
The Jeep/Auburn/Central Manufacturing connection is described in this article.
http://www.coachbuilt.com/bui/c/central/central.htm
The Flathead was a field mod, not much detail was given in the account. Being in a war zone doesn’t stop a true gearhead.
From a great start as the British jeep they have become the Yuppies mini Suburban. I liked it a lot better as a jeep.
They still exist in the original basic form – obviously having moved on from the metal dash days, similar to the Wrangler. They are still on sale in Australia as 90, 110 & 130″ WB models, the latter a twin cab pickup form.
The Discovery-LR3-LR4 is an entirely separate thing.
Haven’t had a lot of experience with LR’s – more so with Land Cruisers and Nissan Patrols…
The Defender/LR2 was for years next to the Dodge Avenger as one of those cars that made you scratch your head and say “you mean they still make those?”
Apparently it’s just been redesigned, going from an old-model Ford Escape-alike to a Mitsubishi Outlander clone.
They were featured in Wild Kingdom and “Daktari,” bouncing along the veldt with intrepid National Geographic photographers being chased by rhinos.
I love these. I remember seeing one in my area a few years back. Yes, I had the Matchbox toy version too.
It is interesting to me that even though the British Empire faded after WWII, the Land Rover continued to spread its influence. Conversely, as the US became involved everywhere in the world, the Jeep never seemed to take on the role in other countries that the Rover did. I suspect that the Land Cruiser/HiLux may have eaten both their lunches later, but that is another story.
A great find and a great writeup on it. After looking at that picture, all that is going through my mind is the old kids’ rhyme “Red Rover, Red Rover . . . “
Oh man, that’s what I should have used for the title. It’s perfect!
Jim: A large percentage of those Africa LRs were the big, long wheelbase model, with seating for up to nine or more, and roof racks for shooting,viewing. Jeep never made anything comparable.
I’m also guessing that the strong dollar back then made the LR Land Cruiser more attractive. And by the time folks got exposed to the LC, there was no going anywhere else.
But in the immediate post-war years, surplus/abandoned Jeeps could be found wherever GIs had been.
You know, you really have to give the Brits credit; using the rugged, reliable Jeep as their model, the managed to make a vehicle that was a quality and reliability disaster. Spiffing, smashing, isn’t it, old stick?
Then again, if you a Brit, you are used to pumping money into your jewel of British Engineering and Pride. Anyone who is not a Brit, is either an mechanic or a psychotic.
Just my opinion. Cheerio and pip-pip!
You have to remember that back in the 1950s the Land Rover really was a reliable and high quality vehicle – not just because the Japanese copy wasn’t available yet, but because the Rover Company hadn’t yet been swallowed up by a huge corporation that didn’t know what it was doing.
I’m surprised no enterprising CKD assembler ever thought of buying aluminum bodies alone from BL-era Rover and stripped chassis from Toyota. Heck, get really clever and order the chassis sans engines and some crate Chevy 350s,,,
I beg to differ, but won’t bother with the details.
Just saw a news story about how the Treasury Dept. [huh?] is chuffed about how ISIS got all their Toyota trucks, which are popular in the Mideast. If you’re a terrorist contra mundum, the last thing you need is a breakdown in the field.
One little thing the SWB Rover began life on a 80″ wheelbase the grew to 86″ then with series2 88″. I learnt to drive in an Austin Gypsy the a 73 Landrover SWB hardtop courtesy of the Waitemata electric power board and our nextdoor neighbour the series 3 seemed very light after the steel bodied Gypsy but it was easier to slide on loose gravel and recover but even after running in could only achieve 75mph on a tar road and the noise was incredible.
Ah, dreams, a Series Rover is only in dreams for me right now.
I keep looking at them for sale on TM but one british classic is enough for now and the Hillman finally graduated from carportclassic to curbside classic as its now registered so that might do for a while
I love your Hillman, and cannot wait to read more about it.
Thanx Im enjoying finally being able to drive it legally it draws a surprising amount of attention wherecer I stop. I plan to write about it soon and send the result to Paul.
You got your warrant of fitness okay then?
Yeah it even has a current one now, a 6 monthly pain in the a##.
I really appreciate that the news ones still have their off-road mojo. Jeremy Clarkson drive one to the top of Scotland and James May drove a Victoria Beckham special edition Evoque across the deserts of Nevada (Utah?), and both loved ’em. I believe that to be qualified as a salesperson, they send you to Africa or somewhere for serious off-road training.
Call me old-school, but this is my idea of what an SUV should be: basic, no frills, nothing pretentious. One would have to order the options, they didn’t come standard with the vehicle like they do today.
If you want something like this today, you can just get a UTV.
I don’t think an off road golf cart is comparable.
There’s a lot more to a UTV than a golf cart. Don’t be so dismissive of them.
No, I will be. A Jeep or a Land Rover can be registered and used as a daily driver if one wishes. I’ve never ever seen a UTV on the street that isn’t being tugged by a plushy shiny pickup or fullsize “SUV” to some nature area, cementing my opinion that they are purely recreational toys.
That’s unfortunate, because every farmer I know uses one as part of their daily work, which is what the CJ was intended for originally. Despite being registered as an off-road-only vehicle, they have much better on-road manners than the original Jeeps and Land Rovers. It’s easy to cement negative opinions when you’re selective about what you see.
Ok so recreational toys and farm equipment. Still don’t see a License plate screwed to one
ATVs (same as UTV?) can be street-legal in AZ at least. Now if these little things are legit, then why not Kei cars? I believe Kei trucks can be imported if they’re secondhand.
FYI: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/laws/minitrucks
I never claimed they were necessarily street-legal (in my state, they are under certain circumstances). But a quick look at the Consumer Product and Safety Commission shows that in many states, ATVs and UTVs are required to be titled and registered, and are issued a plate in Arizona, California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. Never let facts get in the way of an opinion!
Oh brother, if I knew I’d be bringing the wrath of the UTV fanbase I wouldn’t have said anything. Look, I acknowledge they have a useful applications and purpose…. as do Golf carts. Only reason I even compared them is that they are both specific application vehicles. My main, and specific retort is that they do not fulfill the niche the original Jeep, Land rover, and I’ll throw in the Bronco and Scout as well, did across the board, which as far as I know were never limited to being licensed and titled in a tiny fraction of states. They were small stripper truck that anyone, not just farmers, not just hunters, not just trail explorers could own and enjoy, even for those without those lifestyles.
My grandfather was a contract mineral prospector, and in the mid 70’s he picked up an old one, probably a ’57 or ’58, for use in this one summer camp. For some reason, he decided to drive it out at the beginning of the job rather than shipping it. The problem was that his camp that year was about 600 miles away! No matter, he gamely set out and eventually did arrive, but not without getting a ticket for going a pedal-to-the-metal 45 mph in a minimum 50 mph zone!
It must have had problems the later series 1 had a 2L engine, the early 1600 motors were seriously underpowered but the later ones could reach 60+ mph in good tune.
Could be, or it could be it was older that I remember… either way he was really annoyed about getting the ticket!
Love these old LRs. When I was in high school (late 90’s) a guy one class below me had a ’59 Series II as his daily driver. He and his dad had bought it and gotten it roadworthy in time for getting his driver’s license. Definitely the oldest vehicle in our parking lot, and the most unique.
I’ve also seen, back when I was in North Carolina about 5 years ago, both a Lightweight Land Rover and a forward-contol variant (I think an FC101 but I’m not 100% sure). Both on the roads and being driven. I wonder if the same person owned both?
I just found that my pseudo-neighbor about a mile away has one of these in powder blue and white. It’s certainly had a useful life by the look of it. I’ve no idea what version it is.
Wow. Never seen one with headlights both in the fender-caps and in the grille recess. I have great memories of driving an lwb SIII around Adelaide.
It’s a neat way of adding driving lights, built-in. I’ve seen one or two like that here.
Nice article. Always liked the functional no frills honest utility of the Land Rover. Practically bulletproof and unkillable.
Seems I recall a mid 1960s Popular Science magazine test of Land Rover vs Jeep CJ-5 and International Scout. The Land Rover was rugged but not considered as “civilized” as the American four wheel drives. The Land Rovers were in their natural element offroad.
Weren’t the Land Rovers built with aluminum bodies and have been for decades? Anybody with experiences in bodywork repairs? Seems the U.S. have lots of qualms about the 2015 Ford F-150 with the all-aluminum body.
They were built from Birmabrite alloy due to steel shortages early on and the practice continued it stretches quite a lot making panelbeating a challenge but it can be welded by skilled artisans, some Landrover series 1s had steel front mudguards Ive seen a few examples but how or why the sudden change (they were all 55 models) Ive no idea better in the bush as they are more dent resistant.
I learned to drive in a Series 2 …, pulling out rubber vines in North Queensland. My current collection of Landies …
KJ in Oz
Interesting that the orange Rover photo above features the old style headlights close to the grill and the newer style on the front fender. Must have had to replace those front fenders at some point, and the only ones available were from a newer Rover
If it’s an SIII, then the fenders would have had the headlights already. I’m wondering whether this is an SII with newer fenders.
Edit: Michael Freeman’s explanation in the text clarifies what this is, although I’ve never seen a Landie in oz with this hybrid face.
Moving the headlamps into the mudguards is necessary to fit a Vauxhall Cresta/Velox engine into a 86 inch series one the extra 2 inches of the 88 in SWB series 2 is in the engine bay, of course thats not why Landrover lengthened their truck, we learned it the hard way.
Yep. The 186 was popular fit here. The one I was using was a four. Not gutless, but slow.
The dash says S III, you can swap out the centre grille with an earlier one, but I can’t imagine why you would want to. Almost any part of any LR is available as replacement parts.
KJ in Oz
I cannot for the life of me recall reading this before. Obviously did because I commented but enjoyed greatly reading the articles and comments again for the first time. Good article Tom. Publish again in a couple years and I’ll probably be just as interested.
You could talk me out of my 4runner with this truck and that’s hard to do.
I had a Series IIA for a while before selling it about two years ago. Very old fashioned motoring, but fun in a slightly masochistic kind of way. I had planned on refurbishing it, but some parts are almost impossible to get (if you want quality NOS or OEM stuff). It would have cost a lot too and I came to realize that I didn’t love the car/truck that much.
There’s currently a “completely refurbished” Series III for sale not too far from where I live. The seller’s asking A$55,000!!!! Help! There’s another one elsewhere in Victoria for A$35,000! Is the price of old Land Rovers following old 911’s into the stratosphere?
I think all the ex-Army ones have gone through the auction process. IIRC they were going for about $6K but depended on model. Also recall some six wheelers too I think.
Rebuildable runners sell in NZ for hundreds not thousands, most require work and are not roadworthy but NZ is littered with old Landrovers.
I drove a softtop Defender several years ago, and it damn near deafened me on the interstate…between the tire roar from the BFG mud tires and the other sounds booming it was awful. I suspect it would be very capable offroad, but I never had the opportunity to find out. I had borrowed it for a couple of days and was thrilled to hand it back to its rightful owner.
Probably in the mid-80s, I remember seeing one of those grey-green four-door LR wagons with a bumper sticker that made me laugh. It had a Union Jack, plus the words: “All parts falling off this vehicle are of the finest British craftsmanship.”
This has probably stuck in my mind a lot more because it was on an extremely tough-looking Land Rover of the old, pre-leather-and-walnut school. Such a sticker on a Jaguar or Triumph or other notoriously temperamental UK product would still be funny — but what really got my attention was that a LR owner was making a complaint about the one British vehicle I would NOT expect to have flimsy construction or a problem with parts falling off. Made me wonder if the LR was really as sturdy as its reputation.
Sometime good knowledge is not enough to drive a car, but practical experience makes a better driver. This blog shares practical experiences and help the owners of car.
I used to watch Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom with Marlin Perkins and Jim Fowler. I seem to remember Jim occasionally riding out on a seat mounted on the front fender of their Land Rover while out on their expedition.
In mining business, I had to use some LRs then and when. I hated to do so, as the LHD version came with strangely positioned pedals, i.e. accelerator forcing to twist you right leg somehow. A pain on long hauls! Second problem was corrosion, a very British idea to rivet aluminium sheet metal to a steel frame! Needless to say the almost one yard long shift stick kept entertaining all passengers dancing wildly when driving on rough grounds.
Switching to a Jeep Wrangler was a great progress!
Monogram used to make a kit of the SWB Series III. Here’s one in its element, the wild back yard.
Missed these death daggers in the first round, rear impact would end up with these in your neck.