(first posted 2/9/2012) Yes, every car has a story; it’s just that some are a lot easier to tell than others. This Esprit punches its way into the latter category with the full force of its 140 hp engine (let’s not get hung up on that just yet). First, there’s the sheer length of it: the Esprit’s story spans four decades. The Esprit was an endless work in progress, with more variations, permutations and face-lifts than Cher over a similar time span. So we’re going to have to narrow down the story somewhat, to the Esprit’s birth and design, and how it (and Lotus) had to adapt it to very changing circumstances.
The Esprit’s genesis was the Lotus Europa, which Colin Chapman specifically created to be a low-cost alternative to the front-engined Elan. A true original, and quite the performer, especially in its latter variants, when the big-valve Ford-Lotus engine replaced the Renault R16 motor. A curb weight of 1350 lbs, a height of 42 inches, and 126 hp resulted in o-60 in 6.6 seconds and a 123 mph top speed.
The design of the Europa was polarizing, never mind the almost total absence of rear visibility, even in the modified Twin Cam body (above). Ron Hickman, Lotus’ director of Engineering gets credit for the body design. Yes; let engineers design cars, and the results are often predictably…unusual. In so many ways, the Europa was the prototype for the Elise: maximum effectiveness; minimum weight.
The Europa, which arrived in 1966, and was often considered the closest thing to driving a F1 car on the street, soldiered along until 1975. But as early as 1970, Lotus Director Tony Rudd identified the need for a replacement. The strategy then being concocted turns out to be rather similar to what Lotus is going through right now; creating a line of bigger, more expensive front-engine and mid-engined replacements to broaden the company’s portfolio, in the never-ending quest to make Lotus a viable player in a difficult market.
image exoticcarsite.com
The front-engined coupe project (M50) became the Elite (above) , and the mid-engined one was referred to as M70. Both were to use the Lotus 907 engine, a 2 liter DOHC sixteen-valve alloy four (all once exotic) that first saw the dim light of a cloudy day in the Jensen Healey (CC here). In the usual Lotus way, cash was tight, and development of both cars simultaneously was not possible. The Elite arrived first, not without some raised eyebrows. A four passenger coupe patterned very much on the Lamborghini Espada, except with a four instead of a V12. Light weight only goes so far.
There was no real plan for the design of the mid-engine M50, except that it would obviously have to be somewhat more conducive to human usage by others than short, lean and young yoga instructors. But as coincidence would have it, Colin Chapman and Giorgetto Giugiaro happened to meet at an automobile show in 1971, and struck up a conversation. One thing led to another, and Giugiaro got the nod to come up with some sketches and a quarter-scale model.
According to an interview with the master designer, Chapman turned down the design and cancelled the project, because it did not meet his criteria for aerodynamics, with a Cd of 0.34. That’s hardly a bad number for such a small and low car. But Giugiario was not so easily deterred, and went ahead and built two full size models, and even gave them the name Esprit, in keeping with the “E” Lotus nomenclature. It was among the hits of the 1972 Turin Show, along with Giugiaro’s Maserati Boomerang, behind it.
The mid late sixties and into the early seventies were the golden era for exotic mid-engine supercars, and Giugiaro was perhaps the leading exponent of them. The De Tomaso Mangusta of 1967 kicked off his parade of hits.
image: supercars.net
The Bizzarrini Manta of 1969 took the evolution a step toward what the Esprit would encompass, especially with its very flat and severely raked-back windshield.
I can switch to my own pictures now, since what I stumbled into on my constitutional walk a few days ago is an S1 Esprit, the very first of so many variants. Why it was sitting there at the curb is another matter, but there’s no doubt it has been the most unlikely find yet in the over 2000 cars I’ve found and shot so far. I almost didn’t believe it when I saw it from a block and a half away. About as likely as finding a submarine on the streets here. Oh, wait a minute…
Yes, the Esprit’s role in the Bond movie “The Spy Who Loved Me” was a memorable first, and a very favorable publicity boon for the new Esprit, which finally arrived in 1975 after three years’ slow gestation.
The Esprit’s body was made of fiberglass, so why not? Well, we’ve managed to get off track here, so let’s get back on terra firma and continue the Esprit’s main story.
The Esprit concept car was built around a somewhat lengthened and widened Europa chassis, with the Lotus-typical backbone frame. The production Esprit merited its own new chassis, but it still paid substantial debt to the Europa’s. To be enlarged, yes, that’s a relative term, as the Esprit is almost shockingly small. It looks so much like the typical supercar in pictures, but it’s only somewhat larger than the a Series 2 Elise, and weighs almost exactly the same (2000 lbs).
tail lights borrowed from a Fiat X 1/9
The Esprit started out to be a semi-affordable Europa replacement, with a projected price well below the Elite coupe. But that turned out to be a gross miscalculation, literally. By the time the Esprit actually arrived in 1976, its UK price was 35% higher than what had been held out to the public just a year earlier. The delivered price in California, $16,844 (65k adjusted) was a bit tough to swallow too, given its actual performance envelope. Lotus and the Esprit were was now on a different trajectory, but the problem was the car needed to catch up first.
The Esprit’s S1 907 engine delivered 160 hp in European trim, and 140 hp in de-smogged US configuration. That resulted in 8-plus second 0-60 times, and a top speed of just barely 120 mph (US version). Well slower than the Europa Twin-cam, and not exactly eyeball squeezing, even for the times, especially for the money.
Perhaps because of the effect of the Bond movie, the Esprit had an excellent first year in the US (474 sold); in fact, its highest sales year ever. But the deficiencies of the S1 were all-to apparent, and the improved S2 arrived in August of 1978.
There were complaints about excessive engine noise, which this cover apparently didn’t subdue sufficiently. Press reviews were none-too flattering; the Esprit appears to have suffered for Lotus’ tight development budgets. Or was it changed expectations? The Europa would never have been criticized for being noisy or crude. But then its mission and price point were in a totally different league. Lotus was forced to price the Esprit substantially higher, then endlessly improve its performance envelope to justify it. Which it mostly did of course, starting with the first Esprit Turbo a few years later.
Even if there were performance and refinement shortcomings in the S1, Giugiaro’s design wasn’t part of them. It’s a period piece, of course, at a time when flat planes suddenly gave the curvaceous Pininfarina lines a serious run for the money. Obviously, we know who won out in the long run. But the influence of Giugiaro’s origami period was vast: angular design predominated in the eighties, especially in Japanese cars. The Japanese took to the origami look as though it was their own.
The Esprit was majorly re-styled in 1987, by Peter Stevens. Sorry, but it just doesn’t do a thing for me, even if the origami look was by then obsolete. The front end looks like it was ripped off a Toyota Supra or such; ironic, since it was the other way around just ten years earlier. And I’m not going to tackle the Esprit in its later life, which included the twin-turbo V8 engine. To sum it up: its performance was often ahead of its main competition, the various mid-engined V8 Ferraris, but it was ultimately a futile battle for Lotus. Which resulted in a huge change of direction with the brilliant Elise. The Esprit finally bowed out in 2004, over thirty years since it was first shown.
And now, a whole new Esprit is on the drawing boards, for 2013. Along with front-engined coupes. History is circular, at least some of the time.
Enough speculation. Right now I’m firmly in love with Giugiaro’s original design. And this one is totally original, right down to the 14″ Wolfrace alloys, shod with tiny 205/215 70 R14 tires (front/rear).
Maybe those mini-donuts will help put the size of the Esprit in better context. I should have stood next to it, but there was nobody around to shoot the camera. Not even a car close by to get some perspective.
As delightful as the Esprit is too look at, some angles are better than others. The worst one is straight-on. Oh well.
Obviously, the US-mandated 5 mph bumper isn’t its greatest feature either, although it actually works fairly well, compared to so many other sports cars of the era that were absolutely butchered by them.
I was thrown a bit by this badge on the rear deck. I couldn’t remember all the Esprit’s vital dates from memory, but something told me this car was built before the 1978 F1 season finished. Which is why I even took a shot of the VIN plate; yes, it’s a 1977. Someone must have added it later.
The other side has this very vintage lettering style. Does that ever take me back…
Needless to say, this Esprit was a ray of sunshine on top of an already unusually sunny winter day. I know it doesn’t always hold up, but I generally find that first editions exhibit a purity that is usually diluted all-too soon. It’s a phenomena particularly common with super cars, as they battled each other with ever more and bigger spoilers, wheel well extensions, and sprouting other signs of testosterone-augmentation.
So I’ve finally found a pre-pubescent “supercar” I could gladly take home, with all of 140 hp. Of course, getting into it is a bit of a question. Better stop skipping that yoga class.
Want the in-depth story on everything Esprit? lotusespritturbo.com has it all.
Heh, I was right for once. Though I wasn’t the first, of course. Anyway, if you see the edges of the windshield you’ll find the odd glue residue and other untidiness that is characteristic of Lotus of the day’s “home built” quality. The diving scene in that James Bond movie must be all special effects stuff, because in a real Lotus you’d probably get leak on a mild downpour, much less completely under water.
Heh. The next model (1980) appears in the early parts of “For Your Eyes Only” (just before the scenes with the 2CV). It gets blown up due to its “burglar protection”. Interestingly, it has the same basic origami shape with a few cosmetic differences.
There is a white turbo Esprit that self destructs in the earlier half of the movie, and a burgundy one that is used later when Bond goes to Cortina, they make it seem in the movie that its the same car, since Bond snarks at Q “I see you’ve managed to get the Lotus back together” when he’s back a Q-branch.
The Esprit is tied to the Moore era Bonds like the DB5 is tied to the Connery era Bond, interestingly, either Lotus slipped up or the producers decided to stop usting Lotus’s, Bonds next car in 1987’s The Living Daylights was an Aston Martin V8 Vantage.
I always interpreted the crack to Q as an unapologetic acknowledgement that he’d destroyed the first car and that Q branch was obliged to produce another one.
As a kid I thought these were neat, I wanted one. Seeing one as an adult I could tell it was a step up or two above a kit car. I’d still like to drive one.
I’ve always loved Lotus cars, their style and lightness. Which is why I’m horrified at their future plans. Then again, Ferrari is currently making money. Lotus isn’t (or at least not much). And, despite my love for the marque, there’s never been one of them in my garage. More due to lack of local support (I’m a good bicycle mechanic, let’s leave it at that) than anything else.
205/70/14 is what I put on my ’95 Camry…
A 2000 lb car does not need 305-35VR19 rubber.
I despise low profile tires. The make a car skittish and downright dangerous in rain or even worse in snow. That on top of a hard ride and having to replace bushings constantly. And of course, those tires themselves, which are outrageously expensive.
My Acura has 205-60VR16 tires and they are a great balance of ride, handling and wear. I don’t need 0.9g in a turn. I am never going to do that.
I’m right with you on that! I had 255/55/17s on my Dakota R/T and I hated them, I hated the ride and hated that I had a daily driver I couldn’t drive in rain or snow. I wound up getting widened stock 15″ steelies with 275/60s for the rear and stock steelies for the front with 225/70s. It made a world of difference!
+1. Every Mazda3 hatch comes stock with 17s. Some people around here (MA) go down to 16s for the winter. I do it to get some extra sidewall all year – it’s not like our roads are only lousy during one season.
I’m glad mine’s an ’05; rides nicely on 16s.
Low profile tires do not make a car dangerous in the rain. It’s the tread pattern that most of them have that cause the problems in the rain. I have zero problems in the rain, which we get a lot of in the PNW, with the 255/45-18s that I run on some of my Panthers. Why because I chose a tire that has a good tread pattern for evacuating the water between the tread and road and a soft enough compound to still stick (unless the temps drop too low but then I’ve driving a Scout or one of our cars that is equipped with ice and snow tires) Despite the low profile aspect ratio there is still a reasonable side wall height that doesn’t impact the ride that much. In fact my 92 CV that is seriously lowered still has a smoother ride than many cars on the road and I’ve had complements from those driving cars with much higher profile tires.
In general though I do agree that a 60 series tire is a good compromise between steering response and ride comfort.
I’m going to put some plus sizes on my Accent and go from a 70 to a 65 while keeping the same rims and getting a tire that’s better on curves and in the rain. The stock tires blow on this car and will spin on any moisture on pavement.
I’ve plus zero’ed a lot of cars in the past to put a little more rubber on the road w/o the need for new wheels. Now I often put ice and snow tires on the stock wheels and get some larger OE wheels for summer tires, and often + 0 on the +1 wheels.
The “Spy Who Loved Me” stills are priceless. An old friend (who went on to be a screenwriter, now in video games) used to go on about how he wanted that Esprit, purely based on his Bond-mania. He didn’t really believe us when we told him it wasn’t that fast. Pretty, though.
The Manta, with its one-angle hood and windshield, looks like it wants to be the family hauler of the future – a minivan for people in spacesuits. We could call it the…”Trans Sport”… 🙂
It actually did predict the family hauler of the future, the Prius. Look at the Manta’s profile shape, scale it up to Prius height and it’s a good match. Right down to the little window forward of the door. It’s got the vertical half-backlight too, just like Prius. Bizzarrini was forty years ahead.
The Manta is h-u-g-e. I saw the car close up (now in a fascinating love-it-or-hate it aqua paint job with orange highlights) at the Petersen Automotive Museum last summer, after reading a magazine article about it. It’s supercar low, but it has three-abreast seating, with the driver in the center. I don’t recall the dimensions without looking them up, but in terms of perceived size, it looked like it could probably swallow the Esprit whole — some kind of mothership, I guess.
Wow. I didn’t just guess the wrong car, I was at the wrong end of the car (looked like a rear hatch slope to me). Glad I was wrong, this is a much better car to profile!
I haven’t seen one of these is long time. The last one I saw was beat to hell.
Back in the 70s, when going to college I used to pass a JPS liveried Europa parked on the street. Always loved those things. But there was no way I’d ever fit in one.
It’s not fair to compare the horsepower we take for granted today with 30 years ago. They did the best they could with the tools at hand.
For all the bitching and moaning about catalytic converters and emissions, the power we get today is amazing.
What a fantastic find. While the S1 Esprit is deeply flawed it is still my favorite. Something just right about it.
That steering wheel is (besides ugly) very reminiscent of VW and Audi ditto from the period. It is an original I assume?
I assume so, since the rest of the car is so original. Pretty dull, and yes, they undoubtedly bought it from someone else. A “proper” sports wheel probably wouldn’t have met safety regs.
I think the wheel is shared with the earlierJensen Healy, or at least it looks like it, the interior must have been redone somewhere along its life, all these early Esprits had like green and red plaid seats and the dashes were covered in that spray on simulated mouse fur fuzzy dash topping that was popular with exotics at the time.
The redesign in 1987 really turned me on to the Esprit but the original was a pretty pure form, just clean and simple.
My lust for things Lotus was confined to the 7 and the Europa. Never got around to owning a 7, and when I tried some seat time in an Europa, I quite literally couldn’t get in. Short, lean, yoga instructor doesn’t define any of me. Oh well, other days, other dreams.
What a timeless design from the master.
The 1987 restyle dulled the car in almost the same way the VW’s 2nd gen “update” messed up another Giugiaro “origami” masterpiece, the Scirocco.
The 2013 version is generic and forgettable. Lightning doesn’t strike twice in this case.
One of my favorite cars of all time. Which is wierd, because I typically have a strong dislike for the origami look. I especially hated the Countach’s angular look. Sure, it makes no sense, but then passion and cars typically never do.
I’d love to run across a clean example in the classifieds. I’d be SORELY tempted.
You don’t get into a Lotus so much as you strap it on.
You really can’t get just how small these Lotuses are until you get up next to one, in person or in traffic. There used to be an Elise every day in the parking lot where I found the Rolls (not Beverly Hills, just Hillsboro) until it was replaced by a new Nissan Z.
Lotus provided the ideal platform for the Tesla Roadster, super light and minimal, with exotic cutting-edge looks. Their consulting services too. Tesla was free to concentrate on the electric powertrain, which was hard enough, without dealing with the whole gargantuan task of fielding a modern production car.
Per the person I spoke to at the Tesla headquarters dealership in Mountain View, the primary reason they went with an outsourced chassis was so that they could piggyback on the Federal crash test certification of the Elise.
A flatmates brother had a Europa back in the day shit brown colour with Renault power he was 6ft4 and fitted in. I had a good look around a turbo Esprit at Winton race way they are very small and bloody fast on a track.
Not all of these had the green and red tartan interior although it was fairly common. It’s not surprising that this one is white, most of the early ones are, again thanks to the James Bond movie. There was actually a 3 year waiting list to get a white Esprit back when these came out. Oh and that submarine scene wasn’t special effects, they really did build a sub out of one. It was just a body shell from lotus with no engine or interior that was fitted with the fins and propulsion you see in the movie. It was a wet sub, meaning it wasn’t sealed, the driver was inside in full scuba gear. It had no reverse thrust though and therefor no brakes so driving it would have been interesting. This is one of my all time dream cars, and if you do find one the purchase price is not that unreasonable. To say nothing about the maintenance costs which undoubtedly are.
Congratulations on a rare find. I think that this Lotus is the new Sultan of Scarce here on CC, taking over for the prior title holder, the ’68 Imperial convertible.
These never really showed up in the midwest. Believe me, I would have noticed one among all of the Oldsmobiles and Monte Carlos.
Actuallly, I am only now starting to develop an appreciation for this kind of styling. And here you go, stretching my nice, comfortable universe again 🙂
I always used to think that the Europa looks like a mini-El Camino from some angles.
Helluva find, Paul! If I were in Eugene I’d go check it out myself. (I know that road well.)
In addition to the afore-mentioned design cues shared with Lamborghini, the Esprit looks to me alot like the earliest Countach, which is still an all time aesthetic favorite.
This brought back a lot of memories … I had a Europa TC JPS Special that I breathed on and would kick out 150 hp … and even with its 175-70-13’s as front tires would pretty much repeal the laws of physics when it came to road holding. The 150 hp would allow me to do some pretty silly things on the back roads of North Carolina … parts were easy to get if you know what cars they came from … The Achilles heel of these cars were the rear hubs that used electrical shaft bearings rated for 5hp … and I used to run through them at a huge rate … Visibility wasn’t too bad with the cut down sides, especially if you had door mirrors …
The Esprit, on the other hand, was significantly under-engineered all areas and it took about 5 years just for the factory to get them about right. The electrics were pretty marginal and Chapman’s cheapness meant that no electrical relays were employed, thus feeding full voltage and amps to switches not built to handle it … but when the cars ran right, it was an amazing experience …
That is an amazing find. The odds of finding a car like this parked on the street are awfully slim. About the only place I’ve seen Esprits were at the Lotus stand at the Chicago Auto Show when they were new, but there is a white late ’80s version that usually puts in an appearance at the British car show we have in Davenport every August. Paul is right, these cars are very small and extremely low to the ground.
When I was in college, I worked for a portrait & wedding photographer (Jun ’77 to May ’80) . The owner or manager of one of the restaurant’s/catering halls where we often photographed receptions owned a yellow one. In hindsight, it was probably a Series 1 maybe a Series 2 Esprit.
My 18-19 year-old self thought it was extremely cool.
Lotus made sure an early Esprit was parked outside the Bond production offices at Pinewood Studios because they wanted it in the next Bond film. I’m not sure when the submarine/car aspect was scripted, but there are not too many other British makes that would have had similar aquadynamics. Imagine an AMV8 plunging underwater!
Major Anya Amasova and a Lotus Esprit would make my day.
The federalized bumpers are as awful as every other euro adaption but a damn fine looking sports car otherwise. I like the 87 redesign though, moreso than the cladded out Turbo models of the 80s anyway. The Elise is an ugly little tumor compared to either Esprit design in my eyes.
Lucky curbside find indeed! Angular, yes, but in just about the best way possible. And they look great in white.
I saw the hot wheels version of this at work
I’ve only seen 1 or 2 of these at British or antique auto shows over the years….never on the road/street, what a find.
As far as that “plaque” affixed to the outside of the car, shouldn’t it be attached to the dashboard?
I’ve always liked most Lotus cars, but I’m no fan of the Elite, or it’s “sister” the Eclat. Not that I really have to worry as I can’t afford any of them nor can I fit in any of them.
It is pretty cool despite the severely angular lines. I catch some of the last generation Eldorado greenhouse in the front 3/4 view this car. If that was intentional on the part of Cadillac, the Eldo was probably the last car this car inspired.
Such a beautiful car. I have to wonder if the interior was redone, I remember seeing this car’s double (quite possibly this very car)in a Portland euro dealer long ago,but with the violently ugly first green and red tartan interior. The most 70’s interior ever, possibly. Edit- I see Carmine beat me to it with this observation, I have to say though that that interior was so ugly that it was cool!
Esprit S1s were delivered with staggered tire sizes, 195/70HR14s front and 205/70HR14s rear. The front wheels are one inch narrower than the rears.
The car pictured above as an ’87 Peter Stevens model is actually an example of the Julian Thompson redesign of 1993.
Seem to recall reading somewhere of a proposed 1.8 version of the Lotus 900 Series that was rejected by Colin Chapman, not sure whether it was indeed the case though.