Having recovered from a litany of dramas, faux-pas and catastrophes (allied bombings, the loss of the Eisenach factory, the V8 debacle, etc.) in the post-war years, BMW spent the ‘60s rebuilding their image and confidence, thanks to the 700 and the Neue Klasse. The takeover of Glas in 1966 brought a huge increase in capacity, enabling the Bavarian company to start looking into prestige projects once again. It took a while for one to gel, but eventually BMW got into the supercar game. But just the (M-)one time.
The M1 project, initiated in 1975, was aimed at the WRC Group 4. The idea was to design a completely new race car from the ground up, build the required amount of street-legal versions and go after the championship title, then firmly in the hands of Lancia’s legendary Stratos.
Like the Lancia, BMW planned to go for a mid-engined layout. The issue was that they had very little experience in making cars of this type, so the Bavarians looked for an outfit with a proven track record. Eventually, a deal was struck with none other than Lamborghini, who started manufacturing a prototype. By the Italian carmaker was undergoing a period of turmoil following the departure of its founder, so work proceeded at a very slow pace. Too slow for BMW, in any case, who constantly tried to get the project back on track. They even considered the outright purchase of Lamborghini in 1976, but thought better of it.
There was no ideal solution, so BMW chose to renege the Lamborghini contract and take the M1 elsewhere to be finalized, tested and eventually partially assembled. The remainder of the development work was undertaken by a group of ex-Lamborghini engineers. For the rest, BMW contracted Italdesign, who worked in collaboration with a couple of second-tier coachbuilders to manufacture the tubular structure of the car and the fiberglass body panels. Both these elements were put together by Italdesign, who also oversaw the M1’s interior and some of the electrics.
The styling was penned by Italdesign supremo Giorgetto Giugiaro – a very busy man in the ‘70s, though it took inspiration from an earlier mid-engined BMW study undertaken by Paul Bracq, the E25 Turbo.
The 1972 Turbo was a pure dream car, though it did have a functioning chassis (with a transverse-mounted 2002 engine). It was made to commemorate the Munich Olympics, as well as the construction of BMW’s brand new quadra-cylindrical high-rise HQ in the same city. Although the M1 is a completely different car in many ways, a few visual cues were evidently carried over.
Partially built in Italy, the M1s were then shipped over to Stuttgart, where coachbuilder Baur would mate the M1 shells with the BMW-sourced running gear – i.e. the drivetrain (a 3.5 litre DOHC straight-6 with Kugelfischer fuel injection, producing 266hp (in street tune) and mated to a ZF 5-speed transaxle) and suspension. The cars were then taken to Munich for a final tune-up and inspection by M.
The 3.5 litre six, dubbed M88, was derived from the M49 3-litre found in the E9 coupé, albeit with a completely new head featuring 24 valves and, for the first time in a BMW production engine, twin overhead cams. This was a compromise: BMW engineers had initially hesitated between a V12 and a V8, but the project was probably deemed costly enough as was.
Given this rather protracted birth and convoluted production scheme, the M1 took a lot longer to make it on the track than expected. Priority was given to the track cars, most of which were ready by late 1978. However, they were not allowed to race in the WRC Group 4 as intended, given that the required street car equivalents were not yet made. So a special M1-only category was created, dubbed Procar, for 1979-80. BMW, in collaboration with Osella, built 44 cars for this category, which featured a 470hp engine and a number of aerodynamic and technical ameliorations.
The first street version M1s only reached their owners in February 1979. Distribution was limited to West Germany and a handful of European countries – no M1 was ever sold new in the US, Australia or Japan. The majority of cars (163, to be exact) were painted white. The deep orange hue sported by out feature car was the second-most common colour (98 cars), followed by a more Italian-looking red (71 cars) and blue (59 cars).
The M1 was a partial failure, in that only 399 street cars were made when BMW were hoping to reach 800. As brilliant as it was (and it was an outstanding performer, both on road and track), the M1 arrived a little late to the party, somehow. The fashion for bespoke and wedgy mid-engined racers was on the wane at the WRC, even if the Lancia 037 was to give it one last hurrah before the 4WD Audi rewrote the rulebook.
With the track cars, including a handful of Group 4 and Le Mans prototypes, the total number of M1s made only tallied 453 units. The last car was made in early 1981, but the M1 racers carried on competing until 1986.
There is quite a lot of information about these cars out there. The one facet of the M1 programme that seems to have been kept under wraps was the financial side — not a peep about what the whole deal cost BMW. I guess their pockets were quite a lot deeper by the late ’70s, so a pure prestige / sporting effort like the M1 was probably not going ot be an issue. Still, the fact that none of the following “M” cars were as elaborate as this one hints that it must have been a rather expensive project. There really could be only one M1.
Related post:
CC Outtake: 1973 BMW 3.0 CSL & 1981 BMW M1 – Legends In Aspic, by T87
A fascinating story that is new to me.
I must confess that I am left cold by that Italian school of angular design that found its way into so many cars of the period.
Yeah, not mad on it either, with the exception of the original LP400 Countach.
Pretty car for the times. But the twin “roundels” (where did they get that dumb name anyway?) look superfluous and detract from what is otherwise quite a clean design. BMW was lucky to have Bracq (still alive!) to define the classic look which really put them on the map in the US I had a 2800, lovely to look at, lovely to drive, but fragile! The M1 made a big impression on me at the time and still does!
Roundel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundel
I knew that the BMW Roundel is intended to represent an airplane propeller, evoking BMW’s origins as an aircraft manufacturer.
What I didn’t know is that the Tide logo, the Target logo and the symbol for London’s Underground are also known as roundels.
Funny that Target’s logo would be called a roundel, and not a… target…
I agree – the twin rear badges never looked very BMW or German to me. Otherwise, visually, it’s right on the money and has aged very well. Over 50 years old? really?
Being a big fan of all things BMW as a yout, I’ve always had these on my radar and knew quite a bit about them when they were initially introduced. They’re fun to see in person and always impress me as being a smaller car in real life than in photos.
That said, that basic flat, wedgey, design with no rear visibility seems so very dated now. Just like big hair and jackets (for men as well as women) with big shoulder pads. With the sleeves rolled up for men. I don’t personally have a lot of nostalgia for most of the fashions of 1980s.
It’s still nice though to see an M1. I wish that the owner of this one hadn’t littered up the interior with those weird cushions and whatever is responsible for all of those wires running all over the place. That powerstrip of DC adapters is almost scary. A surprisingly messy look for a somewhat rare supercar.
That cluttered interior is impressive for what it suggests: that someone is daily driving such a rare, iconic, and eternally, wildly expensive car as an M1.
And those puzzling pillows aside, the cheap seat covers lead me to wonder if they’re protecting well-preserved original upholstery, or covering original upholstery that’s falling apart from decades of enthusiastic (ab)use.
No mere garage queen or museum piece, this particular M1…
Wow, what an impressive capture – nice find! I agree with above – not a fan of the twin Roundels, nor the messy interior!
Great overview of this car. I had forgotten just how complicated the M1’s development really was. This week, in fact, I was looking into M1s because I’m finishing up an article on a late ’80s M5 (which used the M1’s engine), and I realized just how complicated the process of bringing this car to market really was. I doubt that BMW actually got much of a return from this investment… the brand was excelling even without a supercar. But I’m glad they stuck with the program, because this is a great car, and an even better story.
And I think I’m in the minority here, but I like the twin roundels.
A return on its investment? Certainly not financially; it was a mammoth black hole. And image-wise, it didn’t really do much either, as sales were tepid (well below expectations) due to low interest in them. So it really didn’t function as a halo car, especially in the US, BMW’s most profitable market where the M1 was never sold or seen. The whole project was a huge mistake, which explains why BMW didn’t try it a second time. Egos ran out of control.
I remember at the time the endless delays and issues with getting it out, and then it didn’t really perform at supercar levels. It actually reminds me some of the Cosworth Vega.
I vividly remember the hype about the M1. I was a dedicated Car and Driver reader and followed the saga of the M1 in great detail.
The actual car was not worthy of all the press it got. Like Paul states above, it is much like the Cosworth Vega, or even the Edsel. Tons of hype for what was kind of a mediocre result.
As a certifiable BMW nut for some 40 years now, I’m of course familiar with the M1. I’ve been to numerous BMW shows, usually referred to on some variation of Fest, which are both to show your car, but mostly to talk to people whom you may have known online for years, but never met in person more than to actually look at cars. Anyway, I’ve seen one, M1. In 2004. At a more limited gathering the next day, doing it’s best to convert tire rubber into smoke. Quite successfully I might add, even if I even at the time, not to mention later, failed to understand the rational.
In other words, they’re really f********** rare, unlike more pedestrian 2002 Turbos or E12 M535i’s which I’ve seen more of. And with an admitted bias, jawdroppingly good looking. Been 20 years as I said, but IIRC they, scratch that, it looked smaller than I expected. Whatever, if I ran across one and it was a choice between my left one and it, I’d have to think hard.
The dual Roundels on the rear do look goofy looking even if the rest of it is gorgeous.
I’ll take a nice a wedgie any day of the week. Those put off by the dual rear roundels could just cover them with a pair of googly eyes. That would at least give others something to chuckle about as they try to follow you taking turns at double the limit. My only criticism is the engine cover panel gap is atrocious but maybe its not fully closed to show people the engine. Many slightly younger reviewers have come away impressed by its excellent driving dynamics. As far as performance concerns I agree that in order to stand out as a halo car they should have put the 450+ HP racing engine in all of them.
Also, I have never seen a rear quarter window and air intake as complex and unique as the M1. Probably a PITA to keep the intake clean but a design this cool looking is worth the extra work.
Also note how those quarter windows appear to be mounted on hinges to actually open. I’d wonder how doing so may affect the air intake, tho’ I’m not sure they’re meant to pop open (via an interior latch) for driving vs. just being openable at rest (via the visible screw at the rear corner there) for cleaning.