(first posted 11/20/2018) The AC name is, or was, well known. Remember the Cobra? A Ford V8 and a Carroll Shelby designed installation in the compact AC Ace body and chassis, which dated from 1953. The resulting car was billed by some as the fastest car in the world in the early 1960s, albeit with a very different heritage and driving experience to a top European sports car. Perhaps it’s best to think of it as a de Tomaso Pantera for the 1960s, not a Ferrari. But it was still hugely charismatic and appealing, and that endures.
But the Ace was really AC’s last roll of the dice, as a manufacturer. Aside from the Ford V8, the engines used by AC had been reworked versions of the 2 litre, straight 6 engine used by AC since the 1920s. In some ways. AC was like Swallow Cars, the predecessor of Jaguar, in that cars were built with specialist body work on a chassis purchased from Standard Motor Co, usually with an AC engine. Unlike Jaguar, AC production never reached the higher volumes, barely averaging 100 cars a year through the 1930s. For one of Britain’s oldest surviving manufacturers, it was a low number.
After the war, AC resumed production with the 2 Litre, based on the pre-war car, and still with beam axles front and rear. The body was wood framed with aluminium panels, and not surprisingly volume was truly limited.
But in 1953, AC got a successful roll of the dice with the Ace roadster and the later Aceca Coupe, which still used the familiar 2 litre 6 cylinder around a wood framed aluminium body, now with independent suspension based around transverse leaf springs. If you feel the styling apes contemporary Ferraris and Maseratis, join the queue….
This is the car Shelby put the Ford V8 into, creating the Cobra, and the AC image that exists to this day.
An extended Cobra chassis was used to create the AC Frua or AC 428, a car that conceptually challenged an Aston Martin DB6 or DBS, although given the Ford V8 engine it was closer to an Iso Grifo or a Facel Vega than the more thoroughbred Aston. Volume remained very low, still.
AC also built the once familiar Invacar, a three wheeled vehicle powered by a motorcycle engine and designed specifically for disabled war veterans. These were built with a glass fibre body over a basic chassis, and perhaps could be considered as the last gasp of the cyclecar. The intention was to provide independent mobility to wheel chair users through various government disability benefit schemes. Production of these ended in 1977, after 18,000 had been built in just 5 years, with Steyr-Puch engines, due to safety concerns and they were finally legislated off the road in 2003.
By the end of the 1960s, then, AC was seen as the Cobra and not a lot else. The company, owned and led by the Hurlock family, knew it needed to produce a new product, or fade away. Derek Hurlock found something, from within Britain’s extensive independent sports and racing car network.
In late 1972, a car named the Diablo was shown by two former Lola racing car engineers, Peter Bohanna and Robin Stables. The car was built around a BLMC E series four cylinder engine with the five speed gearbox in the sump, mounted transversely behind the driver, and taken from the Austin Maxi of all places. The intention was to build and market the car as the Diablo, but BL declined to supply the Maxi engine, suspecting that the production volume would be needed for the Maxi and Allegro. The Diablo project was effectively ended.
At this point, AC saw the potential and stepped to, with adequate funding to complete the project, but with a different engine and thereby creating a car with a very different character.
By the London Motor Show in October 1973, AC had a prototype ready. AC had picked a route, one of two chosen by so many other specialists. These two options were – the Rover (ex-Buick) 3.5 litre V8 or the Ford Granada and Capri 3.0 litre V6, known as the Essex, the area of England in which it was developed. The Essex engine was part of the family of V4 and V6 engines Ford developed in the UK, separately from the German Ford V4 used in the Taunus range. It may seem surprising now, but British market and European market Granadas had different engines, with the German built cars having German V4 and V6 engines. All Essex engines were of 60 degree angle, single OHV V format and had a reputation for toughness and durability, if not sophistication, and appeared in many, many places, including TVR, Reliant Scimitar and Gilbern products, as well as Ford cars and vans.
AC went for the Ford 3.0 litre V6 with a bespoke five speed gearbox developed by AC themselves and mounted below the engine and driven by a Renold triplex (3 strand) chain , within a spaceframe chassis under a composite body. The Diablo styling was gently reworked for a bit more presence and the car had a definite impact in the right strong colour. The AC ME3000 was shown, as a prototype, with production planned for 1974 at a claimed rate of perhaps 1000 a year, and priced to compete with the likes of Lotus Esprit and TVR 3000M.
The car’s suspension was by wishbones front and rear with coil springs; the wheelbase was 91 inches and the length 157 inches. The car weighed in at just under 2400lbs. Performance was not spectacular – 8.5 seconds to 60mph and 120 mph maximum. A Rover 3500 would out perform the AC, and the Ford Granada with the same engine was very close; the Lotus Esprit was off into the distance.
1974 and 1975 were absorbed by development and a struggle to achieve type approval. Significant issues were encountered in ensuring that the steering column’s rearward movement under impact was within limits, necessitating another round of (expensive for AC) testing. The prevailing economic conditions didn’t help of course.
The car was a regular at the then annual London Motor Show, with “production coming soon” always being the headline. By 1976, AC were claiming 1200 deposits, but in the face of extreme inflation, funding the car was getting harder. The price of £3-4000 predicted in 1973 now looked very unlikely.
In October 1978, the car finally went on sale, now labelled the AC 3000ME, at a cost of £11,300, an increase of around 50% over the 1973 prediction. But it was March 1980 before Autocar got to test one, by which time the cost was over £13,000 and within spitting distance of a more powerful Porsche 924 Turbo. As I’ve said before, no one got fired for buying IBM, and no one gets mocked for buying a Porsche….
Autocar liked some aspects of the car, though. The space and practicality (relative, of course) were praised but crucially performance was lacking and the handling was not considered as the best or most stable. This was not a Lotus Esprit, perhaps its closest British competitor. Over the next five years, production totalled just 71 cars and in 1984 AC finally accepted the inevitable. Production ceased and the company licensed the name and design to a separate business, based in Glasgow.
The new company, AC (Scotland) plc started production in Glasgow and developed a MK2 version of the car, using the Alfa Romeo 2.5 lire V6, originally built by Alfa for the 1970s Alfa 6 saloon.
Mentioning this gives me the excuse to show another photo of an Alfa Romeo engine….
In this case, this is the engine of the pre-production AC 3000ME Mk2, with the Alfa V6 engine, as prepared for the son of Derek Hurlock. The car was definite step up from the Ford engined car, and included Alfa suspension elements as well.
However, only one car was built to this specification, as the company folded around it. The interior was fundamentally unchanged,but the Alfa input was evident – the steering wheel, stalks and gearlever are all recognisably Alfa, even if the rest of the interior still shows a lot of 1970s BLMC items.
By 1985 it had all stopped again. AC (Scotland) plc ran out of money, and after 30 cars, production stopped again.
There was one final attempt to restart production in Scotland but by 1988 it was definitely all over. Another British sports car marque, and its history, was gone.
To resolve the performance issue, a turbo charging package was devised by an aftermarket tuning company. A total of 19 cars were modified, offering around 200bhp. But, really, this was tinkering around the edges.
The feature car is recorded as a 1986 car; I’m guessing it’s therefore likely to be one of the Scottish cars and one of the last ACs built. There are fewer than 300 ACs of all types recorded in the UK now.
There was one other episode in the AC 3000ME story. One car was shipped to Ghia in Italy, then owned by Ford of course, and reskinned as the AC-Ghia concept.
AC were not interested – after all, the money had pretty much all been used anyway and you sense the car needed more than a new skin to make it a true commercial success.
There was interest from a Shelby associated consortium in marketing the car in the US, with a Ford 2.2 litre engine. Another dead end.
In hindsight, many things were against the AC 3000ME. The delays in coming to production, the lack of performance, the price for a hand built composite car against a Porsche, the humble origins of the engines, the Lotus Esprit with its James Bond association and stronger performance. But, now, a rarely seen (I think this is the first I have ever seen on the road) memory from a time when the British sports car industry still seemed to have a future of variety (Lotus, Jaguar, TVR, Reliant, Morgan, AC, Aston Martin) and a piece of optimism against the mass market manufacturers’ perennial threat of collapse.
A lot here I didn’t know about the AC 3000 – I didn’t realise they made so many. It would certainly have been more attractive with an Alfa motor in it. It should be remembered that, like the AC 3000, the AC Ace was a car that AC didn’t actually design themselves.
You touched on the Invacar, which I’m sure AC were producing throughout the 1950’s. Certainly AC were making the 3 wheel Villiers engined Petite in the mid 50’s. Likewise, Allard offered a Villiers powered 3 wheel car in the 50’s.
Obviously there were other later ( futile ) attempts to revive AC after the demise of the AC 3000.
Yet another car that is completely new to me. And another depressing British car company story. A car that does nothing singularly well yet is priced far above others with more talent – this has never been a recipe for success.
I have to say that I find its styling challenging. The early 1970s has never been my favorite period when it comes to styling in Europe and the UK, but this one, well, . . . . It is like the designers kept standing back to look, then saying “OK, just this one more thing.” Over and over. The basic shape is not bad, but thereis just so . . . much.
As for the Alfa connection, well each of us has our thing. Alfred Hitchcock would do a cameo shot early in each of his movies. You can find some Alfa connection with everything . 🙂
You’re not trying. This has wheels. It is well-known that Studebaker fitted wheels….
Hahaha, you got me. 🙂
Lots of interesting things as usual, Roger. Must admit to slight embarrassment at always thinking the AC six was essentially the BMW-Bristol till reading this. Obvious it wouldn’t be, really. Ahem.
Was their first Ford effort a hotted-up Zephyr six, in that so-familiar roadster body? I recall seeing one like that, but there was a huge amount of modding and fiddling went on with exotics here.
As for the 3000ME, that is a rare sighting for sure. Without intending insult, but having full regard to the aesthetics, I might just venture that the rarity of that sight on the roads may be something that falls at the positive end of the spectrum of motoring experiences.
Bristol eventually stopped making the ex-BMW straight six, and started using American V8’s in their own cars. By this time the AC six was past its’ use-by date, so AC adopted the Zephyr six motor – and tweaked the styling of the air-intake.
Arguably the AC engine was past its’ use-by date when (if not before) they started using the Bristol!
The Bristol engine was optional, for customers with racing ambition and deep pockets.
Great article. I wonder how AC managed to keep the lights on during the few years between the end of the Invacar and the start of 3000ME production.
With difficulty, and by servicing/repair/restoration on older cars I suspect
Looks like a Fiero with a JC Whitney body kit. Pontiac may have been inspired by this design…
Not only the general body shape but the sidewinder mid-mount, although it was a four like the Diablo. I count the Fiero alongside the Corvair as GM’s coulda beena contenda cars that they chickened out on.
For some reason this just screams DeTomaso to me from certain angles (mainly the lead image as well as the Mk2.) It’s from the “brutal” school of design which works for me.
Deep down this car is familiar to me from somewhere, perhaps it was featured in CAR or Performance car sometime in the mid 80’s, probably the Mk2 I guess. The Alfa bits certainly make that version more interesting below the skin.
I’m amazed you saw it in a random parking lot, very impressive!
Certainly on my list 1970s wanna-sees,and to see it in a Tesco carpark midweek was a complete “what’s that doing here?” moment. Sadly, no adjacent owner evident
The owner was shopping in Tescos, having stopped on the way home from obtaining this year’s MoT pass. I quite often return to the car to find someone waiting to talk about it. I was pleasantly surprised to find this post.
Roger, your guess that this is a Scottish built car is reasonable given the registration, but you’re only half right. This was one of two chassis built in Thames Ditton by AC Cars in 1984 which went to the AC Scotland factory in Hillington with the production tooling. It was fitted with a Scottish built body in 1985 and was to have been the first Scottish car sold, but the deal fell through so it became the factory demonstrator. It was repossessed by the receivers along with five other completed cars when the company folded and sold through dealers around the country. The attached picture shows my white car (Chassis no. 184) alongside the first all Scottish built car (Chassis no. 185) outside what used to be the AC Scotland factory in 2012, at which time it was being used by 3M as a label factory.
Total wannabe. A cast-iron Ford V6 has absolutely no business in a pleasure car like this.
I know it was supposed to be affordable, but if that’s what you’re looking for, buy a Jag. If you can’t afford that, the sports car hobby probably won’t bring you much enjoyment anyway.
I never knew of the Alfa engined variant. Interesting!
The Ford Essex V6 is an odd choice from a performance perspective. It is a big, heavy lump so not ideal in this application. It was perhaps widely available though. Shame they didn’t take the Fiat X1/9 approach and pop in a fwd drive train to the rear. The bespoke gearbox likely was not cheap.
The Ford Esssex and Cologne V6s were readily available and easily tuneable so they made sense for component car builders. The problem with adapting an FWD drivetrain is there was nothing really usable in the UK since BL wasn’t selling drivetrains and the Lotus Europa experience would have made them gun shy about using imported parts. In that light putting Hewland components in a custom case probably made sense.
Also a minor piece of trivia is that the Invacar was originally designed and built by Greeves motorcycles.
I had a ride in a Gilbern Invader years ago and it sounded great as well as being reasonably fast. I remember a modified Capri in the early 90s making about 240hp which is not bad for a basic road car.
Great find Roger!
Fantastic find Roger. This piece certainly filled in the gaps in my knowledge; ‘Lola’ origins and Alfa variant. But like the Frua, an ill-conceived shape which could have been so much nicer.
Fantastic piece, Roger. I can say with 95% confidence that I’ve never heard of, or seen a picture of, one of these cars before. When I first opened this link early this morning, I thought for sure I’d be reading about some kind of kit car.
It ain’t pretty, but I like it for being new-to-me.
BTW – that Invacar reminds me of a more primitive Reliant Robin, which in turn reminds me of Bean.
The Essex V6 was not a good choice, heavy and unreliable it stranded thousands of MK4 Zephyr owners back in the day when the oil pump/distributor drive failed.
Clued up owners treated the hex shaft oil pump drive as a service item, likewise the stupid fibre timing gear. Aside from that, it was pretty reliable with torque like a Diesel engine
After the debacle of the 2.5 Essex V6 which couldnt outlast the 3 month warranty from new, V6 Zephyrs struggled to leave the new car lots, only the 3.0 was fitted at all after 66 and still they were a lemon. You can build one properly to perform and last but not straight off the line,
Nice looking diablo(s)… http://ace.mu.nu/archives/xxxtremeprejudice.jpg
This car does nothing for me. An ugly boring charmless X1/9.
Can’t believe they almost call it ACME 3000
The picture of the Invacar reminds me of watching “Match of the Day” back in the late 70’s-early 80’s and seeing them parked parallel to the pitch.
Here’s another dead-end chapter in the AC story: https://www.railcar.co.uk/type/ac-cars-railbus/
Perhaps though the term dead-end is a bit harsh: two or three of the five built survive in preservation.
One of those early postwar sedans was regularly parked in the Hospital parking lot in Hobart town Tasmania, a mint condition unrestored car, it was there in 03, I suspect its still alive, Very rare car
I find the design has an ad hoc appearance. Upon first glance, I don’t feel it appears to have been styled by an experienced automotive stylist.
The AC 3000ME was an example of a company that knew what it wanted to produce, but that didn’t have any idea how to actually produce it. Even in 1965, redesigning the Ace chassis to handle the 427 engine was the work of Ford. Until then, it had a transverse leaf spring that also served to locate the tops of the front suspension uprights. The styling was truly uninspiring for a midengined wedge sportscar from the era when Italy produced designs like the Alfa Romeo Carabo, the Dino 246GT, the Lamborghini Muira, the Countach, the X1/9, and the Lancia Stratos. Even Porsche had produced the 904, although they sadly made far more 914s. That the 3000GT also had pretty fundamental engineering challenges for owners to try to resolve than an average kit car didn’t help it either.
Curious bit about the Invacar legislated off the road. It appears such legislation must have been rescinded after the original post, as there’s a Welshman on YouTube who has a channel called HubNut, who has a licensed and operational Invacar.
Interesting, and a few very nice looking cars. But the statement of,
“There are fewer than 300 ACs of all types recorded in the UK now.” has me wondering. Really? Unless we here in the US saw all their production for a few years, I’ve got to think more Cobras, real ones, not knock offs, are left here in the US than that 300 number. Did we get that much of their production for a while? Did Cobras get that expensive, that quickly? No data to back it up, just doesn’t sound right.
The AC Cobra, was technically a flop.
It did well at circuit racing, but for sales not so much.
Even with the CSX on the chassis, and all the British bits sent out to the USA, for Carroll Shelby’s Garage to install all the American bits, it still didn’t sell well.
Up against the domestic Chevrolet Corvette.
The British, Austin-Healey 100 / 3000, Triumph TR4 / TR250 /TR6, MG B / C, Jaguar E-Type (XK-E), and then the specialist exports from Jensen CV-8, Lotus Elan, Morgan Plus 4 & Plus 8, Trident, TVR and if you had the money Aston Martin DB4/DB5/DB6, Bristol 407-410 & Bentley Continental S3 & T-Series, .
And then from West Germany Porsche and from Italy, Alfa Romeo, Fiat 124 & Dino Spider, and for those with real money Maserati Mistral, and Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder and 275 GTS.
In the late 60’s & early 70’s their were brand new AC Cobras’ knocking about on car lots unsold.
Also forgot Marcos, but they didn’t offer an open car.