(first posted 4/8/2012) After the Volvo 1800 series was discontinued in 1973, Volvo had a hard time getting back into the specialty coupe business. Their next attempt to get back into that market was the Bertone-designed and built 262C, but its sales were about as low as its chopped top. The 780 was Volvo’s (and Bertone’s) second try at a luxury Volvo coupe.
After the 1800ES said goodbye in 1973, Volvo decided they needed something a little more sporty than their bread and butter sedans and wagons. The result was the 262C, which was designed by the Italian coachbuilder Bertone. It featured a radically chopped top and luxurious leather-swathed interior that would not have looked out of place on a Mark V or Eldorado. As it was based on the luxury 260 line, it was saddled with the less-than-stellar PRV V6. While it provided Volvo with a limited edition top-of-the-line vehicle, sales were never very high and it was discontinued after the 1981 model year.
The new Volvo 760GLE was introduced to the press in Monte Carlo in February of 1982. While there, Volvo executives took the opportunity to visit the nearby Bertone facility. Bertone had not only designed the 262C, they also assembled the cars from Swedish components. Volvo was hardly the first manufacturer to take advantage of Bertone’s production capabilities; they had also built the Lamborghini Miura and Espada, the Lancia Stratos, and the Fiat X1/9. Ultimately, Volvo gave the green light for Bertone to create a new flagship coupe based on the 760. The finished product, the 780, was unveiled in Spring of 1985.
While the 780 looked quite a bit like the 760 from which it was derived, not one exterior panel was shared with it. Under the skin, though, there was much in common, particularly the engine, transmission and suspension components. The 780 was originally offered with two engines. The first engine, meant primarily for the European market, was a 2.4L turbo diesel. It produced 129 hp at 4800 rpm (DIN figures). Zero to 100 km/h was achieved in 10.5 seconds. The other engine, which was supposed to be for the US market, was a smaller version of the 2849 cc PRV V6. The 2458 cc engine included a turbo with intercooler and 163 hp, with a 0-100 km/h of nine seconds. Despite all the work put into this engine, it was never put into production, and North American 780s received the same 2.8L V6 as their 760 brethren.
As would be expected of its top-of-the-line status, the 780 was the most expensive Volvo, retailing between $35,000 and $40,000 during its production run. For that lofty price, you got a limited edition coupe with a very long list of standard equipment. Two-tone leather (later available in solid colors too), beautiful wood trim, Nivomat self-leveling rear suspension and power everything was standard. Anti-lock brakes were also included.
The 780 was never intended to be a high-volume vehicle. Indeed, the reason Volvo contracted production to Bertone was to take advantage of their greater efficiency with low-volume vehicle runs. This car would have cost Volvo a lot more money if they had built it themselves. The price was another factor. My dad got a new 1988 740 Turbo, and it was about $25,000, a not-inconsiderable sum at the time. A 780 would have been at least another ten grand, big money in the late ’80s. 35K translates to about $67K in 2012 dollars, a lot of money for a Volvo.
As expected, 780s were not frequently seen on the street. Production for the 1987, 1988 and 1989 model years were 2035, 2334 and 2166, respectively. My dad was buddies with the Volvo dealer in Moline, and I don’t think I ever saw more than two or three 780s back when they were new cars.
Not much changed during the production run, but in 1989 a Turbo model was added. It produced 175 hp at 5400 rpm and 187 lb ft of torque. It also added lacy-spoke alloy wheels to differentiate it from the V6 780. By now the V6 was making 145 hp.
Mike Lundahl, the dealer in Moline, naturally drove just about every model of Volvo, but I never saw him in a 780. He actually preferred 240 and 740 wagons, as he frequently went duck hunting and always took his golder retriever, Jack, with him. A wagon was essential. However, I did see his wife driving a 780 one time in about 1990. It was a Turbo and very pretty in metallic burgundy with a saddle tan leather interior. I only saw her drive it once, as she preferred the wagons too, and usually had a white 740 or 760 wagon.
By 1990, the 780’s time was just about up. The Turbo model was quite an improvement in performance and reliability compared to the PRV V6, but sales didn’t really go up with its introduction. Just 1300 were made for 1990. The 760 had received a new. more aerodynamic nose in 1988, (the 740 got a similar treatment in 1990) and the 780 didn’t, so now it wasn’t the most modern looking Volvo either.
For 1991, the 780 was renamed the Coupe. Little else changed, although some 780s received a chrome vertical-bar grille. The one 780 I regularly saw was a black-on-black 1991 Turbo, owned by the owner of Circa ’21, a downtown dinner theater. It had the chrome grille, and I never saw another one with it. It was a regular fixture in downtown Rock Island between 1997 and about 2000. For some reason he traded it in on a first-generation S40, the one that was based on the Mitsubishi Carisma. I never figured that one out. Why didn’t he get a C70 or S80? At any rate, I never saw that 780 again.
The 780 had a long life, but only 8518 were built in six model years. Despite this, Volvo probably sold a lot of 240s and 740s to folks who came in to ogle a 780. Its successor (of sorts), the C70, would not come out for another five years, but would be much more affordable and built by Volvo, not Bertone. Our featured car, which Paul found, appears to be a 1989 or ’90 as it has the driver’s side airbag but the 780 decklid badge (’91s would have a ‘COUPE’ emblem instead. Any 780 is a rare find today, so thanks for providing the pics, Paul!
Tom I am really enjoying these Volvo bit. I have a hard time unraveling the mysteries of Volvo nomenclature and dates, thanks.
The 780 is a puzzle to me — if so much of the sheet metal was unique, why make it so plain and dowdy looking? It looks way too much like an old Cavalier, which is almost certainly why it didn’t really sell. They are very nice to drive though, particularly the later versions.
I’m seeing a bit of Maserati Biturbo in the shape of the greenhouse, not surprising with the Bertone link
Reminds me of a taller, narrower, more sharply creased Lancia Gamma Coupe.
And you could turn the steering wheel without risking grenading the engine!
Real Volvos, the ones before Ford bought them, were never, ever cheap, the main reason there were not loads of them on the roads. This was true even in their heyday in the 1970s. Volvo never had much in the way of sales volume. The reason was price; I remember in 1974 a neighbour bought a 245DL wagon and paid $8,000 for it. That translates to $42,500 in today’s money, not small change. Stuff like the Bertone 780 was even more, well into Mercedes Benz territory.
Were Volvos worth that kind of cash? They were certainly better cars than practically anything on the roads in those days and with any kind of maintenance they lasted for years. However, the number of people, even now, who can swing $42k for a car is limited and may go for something with more flash.
No there were not cheap there were plenty in OZ when I lived there but they tended to be retirees cars when new and old beatup versions were driven as if in a demo derby by kids with too much money. Those 780s were not common and $42k was only the down out this way.
I still don’t get this “exclusive image” Volvo has in the US, in Norway and Sweden it’s always been a common domestic brand over here.
…and was often referred to as “the Swedish Ford.”
Bertone took over production of the X1/9 from Fiat in the early 80’s, and it was marketed as the Bertone X1/9. As it was made on the same line as the 780, they were painted in the same paintshop, therefore sharing many colors. That metallic burgundy is quite common on both 780’s and X1/9’s.
And I never understood the demographic either. In Sweden, the price for a 780 was almost exactly double that of the 760, and only hardcore Volvo aficionados would buy one. You can see them in regular use in Sweden, and they are almost always in pristine condition. Those buyers really cared for those cars. I’d call it the Buick of BMW 635’s.
(Old post to reply to, but I suppose the answer is *brand loyalty.* Especially through what was the malaise era for American cars, Volvo earned a lot of hardcore loyalists, often among well-to-do professionals like doctors and such: in some ways, Volvo put out a cool coupe just for those who wanted something snazzier and cooler from that set, because the 80s were… yuppie time and a lot of status items and all. 🙂
That shot of the folded-cardboard Volvo in front of a handsome 6-series BMW sums up my feelings about Volvos. The same basic arrangement of 3 boxes can be rendered with deftness and style, or without. Of those two, does anyone prefer the 780?
Sturdy, safe, yadda yadda. 😉 If you’re paying over twice the price of an average new car, wouldn’t you want some of it go towards the design?
I’m a huge fan of the E24 6-series–it’s one of my favorite cars, period. And yet seeing the photo of the 780 and the 635 parked next to each other seems to bring out some of the few negative points of the E24 design (arguably too-tall greenhouse being the main one). The 780 doesn’t have any features that immediately grab your attention (like the E24’s shark nose) but it’s just extremely well-proportioned. A perfect tailoring job by Bertone on the “off-the-rack” 760 sheet metal.
The 635 is still the more beautiful car, no question, but to me, it’s not that the 780 lacks style, just that it wears it differently and in a very characteristically Volvo way. I just may be biased though…
The driver’s seat on the interior picture seem very close to the steering wheel. The drivers must have very short legs.
I too never know why automakers would give a car mostly unique sheetmetal (most likely at great expense) yet makes them look just like its more pedestrian brothers. So much so that people won’t know the body panels are different unless told. What’s the point then?
I always thought the 780 looked good, but I could never place why, considering the 760 is so uncool. Now I know. It’s because Bertone knew how to tweak the 80’s Volvo design in all the right ways to make it desirable.
I really like that he got a picture of the 780 next to a BMW 6 Series of similar years. That’s a great shot. Unlike the reaction that picture would probably evoke in most people’s eyes, it kinda makes me appreciate the appeal of the Volvo. It’s just a very clean, modern (for the time) design. No flash, no gimmicks, no pretensions. Just a good quality, well made car, coming standard with all the luxury for which anyone should reasonably ask.
Never seen one of these but I agree with Drew’s comment. They obviously adopted a few styling cues for the 850 from these.
This is the only modern Volvo model I’ve never seen in NZ. We never got them new, because there were left-hand-drive only, and although a lot of ex-USA LHD vehicles eventually turn up here, a 780 has remained elusive. Such a shame they were excluded from Antipodean Volvo fans! I’ve wanted one since seeing them in car magazines when they were released all those years ago. I always thought it’d have to be black, but that red/burgundy turbo pictured in the article looks mighty fine!
I don’t ever remember these in the UK either (unlike the unfortunate 262C); if they only built them LHD that’s probably why.
I always liked the look of these, and they are far, far, far more successful than the 262 styling wise. To me, the 262 always looked like it should have been made by Wagon Queen motors. They looked like a Volvo but also managed to look stylish at the same time. The only reason I haven’t sought one out is the engine. The PRV 6 cylinder was nowhere near as good as the redblock, and it is the redblock that makes a Volvo. I think that if ya could fit the proper Volvo modular straight six from an s90, this would be the silky smooth and reliable car that it should have always been. Of course a 740 Turbo redblock or an 850 turbo engine would be cool too. The great thing about Volvos, is that they are quite easy to modify. The engineering was similar regardless of the car, and swapping engines, although not to be taken lightly, does not involve massive rejigging or bodyshell modification.
They did fit the turbo redblock, starting in 1989. By 1991 the PRV was no longer available, and the turbo+ system had brought the power on the B23FT up to 200 HP. Though some of the scorn the PRV attracts is misplaced–the later even-fire B280E/F versions are a very different engine than the original odd-fire B27/B28 that helped acquire that checkered reputation. By ’88 the engine was completely sorted and provided the smooth, trouble-free operation that befitted cars like the 760 and 780. Sure, the whiteblock I6 would be an upgrade, but one arguably not worth the trouble! The problem the 850’s turbo 5 is that, as far as I know, it never appeared in an RWD car, so it would be pretty much out of the question in an RWD application like the 780.
From what I’ve been able to gather, a fairly common swap for these cars is actually a Ford 5.0 V8!
This car was understated and that’s what I like about it. Everybody thought it’s JUST A VOLVO, but then maybe they notice the two doors, then the Bertone emblem, naah, not even. People just don’t know what it is…..
Mechanics are the same as a regular 740 turbo, engines (2.3 turbo 4) was indestructible.
Undervalue and overseen.
These will be some big money one day as they’re all getting thrown away………
I have one with the red block it for sale.
It’s a 90 with Just under two hundred thousand on her
I think the styling of the 780, although understated, works well, with a nod to the Lancia Thema. They are very rare in the UK- suprising when you consider how popular Volvos are here. Rather underpowered with the PRV- why Volvo persisted in using it in the 780 I can’t imagine, far better to have had a 4cyl turbo from the outset. The same goes for the ill fated 480. Jimmy
I have a 1989 bertone turbo– looking to sell. Burgandy with tan leather seats. Needs head gasket but runs well. I am in Des Moines Iowa.
I like the look of this car. Its a clean, handsome 2-door. In my opinion that’s THE basis for any car that’s meant to be a good looking design. Volvo’s lack of 2-doors is the biggest problem with that marque. Sedans are boring, ugly, and really have no particular use. If you need more practicality, a wagon is a MUCH better option and I think it looks better in the process.
I have a 1990 Volvo bertone 780 going up forsale in May. White with black leather interior. Around 130000 miles. Located in west chester pa. Email me if interested garywalton@comcast.net
Nice writeup on a not often seen car! I’ve always liked these, so much so that when I saw one for sale in Richmond, I ended up buying it. It’s a minor project, but the price of entry was low and it’s nearly perfect externally. Owning a car like this has made me appreciate how well Volvo did certain things in the 80’s, and how high a standard they were built to . 161,000 miles and it’s still a SOLID car.
The wheels on the featured car are not original–those are the “Hydra” alloys that were used on the late 740 and 940 turbos. It’s a good look, though! The 780 was only available with two wheel designs from the factory–the 15-spoke “Pegasus” for v6 cars and the “Multi-X” for turbos. Both 15″, but the Multi-x was wider.
I have a 1990 Volvo 780 bertone 4cyl turbo for sale in Phoenix,AZ just call 602 …435….0762
still have it ?
Convergent designs. The ‘H” body Buick 2 door coupe looked rather similar, particularly when offered as the LeSabre T-Type, on of which I own. They were also sold during the 1987. 88. and 89 model years. Less than 16K were built over thtose three years, but the basic 2 door did continue in the LeSabre line until the end of the 91 model year. Another victim of the shrinking market for 2 door coupes.
I’ve long thought that car was one of the best looking GM products of that era.
Makes you wonder what they were thinking when they came out with that hideous downsized Riviera a few years earlier…
I’d never noticed that, but that’s a good point! The LeSabre and 88 coupes do have a similar roofline and overall proportions, and I’ve always thought those were some of the best looking GM products of the 80’s.
Jason, that black LeSabre coupe is beautiful. That is one of my favorite Buick models I like the slanted roof pillars and large green house. Maybe you could do a COAL on it. Choosing between the Volvo or the Bimmer coupe, I’d have to choose the Bimmer. The supply of those 6 series are starting to thin out even around the Bay Area.
Coincidentally, I was reading a Short Take in Car&Driver that detailed Volvo’s new V60 Polestar. I say coincidentally, because while that car has very little in common with the 780, it will be a limited edition and it has a price of about $67,000….not much more than a 780 would cost in today’s money.
I can’t really understand why the 740 and 780 don’t share the same sheetmetal from the windshield forward. I can understand the other body panels but as others have pointed out: the 2 cars look so similar. But then, the 6 and 7 series never shared body panels, did they?
Imagine, for what a 780 cost brand new you could have had 2 Mustang GTs.
Look at that one interior shot of the driver’s seat…the beltline is ridiculously low! I would imagine visibility out of that Volvo is excellent. Some new cars with their high beltlines are really irritating, as it feels like you’re sitting on the floor rather than sitting on top of the seat. (It’s probably unsafe, to some extent, to have such a high beltline). My 1st gen. Chevy Cruze may have somewhat of a high beltline, but you can adjust the seat to a very high position to give somewhat of a commanding view.
I would have like to see the 780s continue through the nineties. The 197hp 2.9 inline 6 would have been a great addition as neither of the engines offered adequate refinement for the prices charged. The boxy lines of the 700/900 series were successfully softened through the nineties. If Bertone could have afforded tooling to do it, they might have done even better.
Love the Bertones despite their cost:value proposition. Very classy looking.
I am again reminded that I need to get mine back on the road…
Quick correction – the 262C was only assembled by Bertone, it was an in-house Volvo design by chief designer Jan Wilsgaard.
Although I made rude remarks about the 262C model; this one I slowed down and peered into every time I saw one in a parking lot.