Just when did BMW transition from being the enthusiast’s ultimate driving machine to the hot fashion accessory brand? The 1990s? The 00s? Maybe as early as the late 1980s? Not in West Los Angeles. I witnessed it happen very graphically there in 1980. And I know of another incident in 1975. There may well have been others, but these two I can vouch for.
In 1978 I started working at the little tv station (KSCI Channel 18) in Los Angeles. It was owned by one of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s transcendental Meditation (“TM”) organizations. I knew nothing about tv, so I just worked my way up on the production side of things, since the station had a fairly small but well-equipped studio, including broadcast quality equipment with 2″ IVC 9000 helical video tape recorders (above) and such. I did everything, from camera operator, video set-up, video tape operator, editor, technical director and director.
The TM movement had applied for the license of Channel 18 back in 1973, at the peak of its financial success. At the time 40,000 people were paying $35-60 to learn TM every month. Do the math. The original idea of the station was to broadcast Maharishi, who had been videotaping his lectures for some years, as well as related programming, including a daily newscast that was only going to cover the good news, as a key premise was that if enough people (1%) of any city or country meditated, things were going to get better and better. Obviously.
I recently found a box of 3/4″ videotapes in my closet including of one of these “Age of Enlightenment News” programs, and sent it to a facility to transfer it to DVD, but they said the tape was unplayable. Major bummer, as no one has ever uploaded one to YouTube. I will try with other means to get it done. It needs to be seen. It was parodied by many in LA, including Johnny Carson.
By the time the station went on the air in 1977, the TM organization’s income had drastically shrunk, and the station’s support from the central organization was being cut way back. So the studio and production facilities were rented out to outside clients, and that became the only major source of income. And that’s what I was involved with.
KSCI was able to attract a steady stream of outside clients, including Mr. Wizard (Don Herbert). “Watch Mr. Wizard” had been a popular series of half-hour shows that ran from 1961-1972. In 1977, he started these 90 second short segments that stations could run during local newscasts or such. They were produced at KSCI. And the only tape of the four I sent in that did play and was transferred is this one.
As pressure for more income increased, KSCI sold some time slots to Japanese and Korean broadcasters, and had gotten involved in an ill-fated attempt at Spanish language tv during the daytime hours. TM programing ran during the early evening time slots. And in order to sell ads for the Spanish language shows (I directed many, but the tape with one also didn’t play), the TM lifers that ran the station at the time decided to hire an experienced radio ad salesman that one of them knew through some connections.
Rich Lyons was his name, and he was straight from Central Casting for the role: slick, always smiling, extremely well groomed, spoiled and demanding, and impeccably dressed. He demanded a big base salary and a high commission rate in order to come to KSCI, as well as a new company car. This was not easy to stomach, as everybody was making a flat $500 a month (about $1900 adjusted), regardless of position. Yes, that was enough to live on in West LA back then.
And what car did Rich demand? A new BMW 320i. In silver. And with an automatic. And air conditioning. Was Rich even remotely interested in handling and performance? Not in the slightest. It was simply something to be seen in tooling down Beverly or Rodeo Drive, and that the valets at the restaurants where he ran up big lunch tabs entertaining clients wouldn’t hide in the back of the lot. Maybe even park in the front of the restaurant if it was a bit of a slow day. And create the right impression wherever he went. The Ultimate Status Machine.
Regarding that badge on its trunk lid: this might just be the first time BMW started fudging with what it stood for. The second two numerals traditionally indicated the engine’s displacement, and the 320i (E21) did gave a 2.0L four for its three years in the US (1977-1979). But the 1980 model came with a 1.8 l version, and had 10% hp drop from 110 to 101. Even with the manual, 0-60 times went from about 10.3 to 11.1 seconds. Not exactly the Ultimate Red Light Dragster. With the three-speed automatic, I’m going to guess it was closer to 13-14 or more seconds. With the a/c on? Glacial. The Malaise Era BMW.
No wonder Cadillac deluded themselves into thinking that their Cimarron with its 88hp 1.8 L pushrod four was going to be competitive with the 3 Series.
I drove it once, when it needed to go to the shop and Rich was tied up with “an important meeting”. Not surprisingly, it was pretty feeble, acceleration-wise. The four 1980 Buick Skylark V6s that KSCI bought later that year would leave this Bimmer in the dust. Handling? In the perpetual stop and go of West LA traffic, who could tell? I’m sure it felt ok out on the open road, but the automatic sucked what little fun it might have had right out of it.
Things were not going well at KSCI. These TM “governors” (the equivalent of Catholic cardinals) that were running the station had no business instinct or skills. They were space cadets. The station was bleeding cash, and Maharishi wasn’t sending any more. Quite the opposite: he wanted the station to make money to prop up his organizations and line his off-shore coffers.
I won’t go into the gory details, but there was a bit of a palace coup, and I suddenly found myself as the General Manager at the tender age of 28. I had developed a plan to make the station profitable, and the sweet old German guy who was the nominal overseer liked it and supported my side of the coup. I soon sent the “governors” packing.
I lkilled the Spanish programming block (and related 26 employees), which was bleeding red ink, as well as the TM programming, and started selling the blocks of time to more ethnic programmers, in 15 different languages, mostly Asian and Middle East. (I eventually brought back a Spanish block when the environment for it and the quality improved).
And I negotiated a deal to be the first affiliate of FNN (“Financial News Network”), a new mostly-cable network that eventually got bought by NBC and turned into CNBC. Back then, much of LA didn’t even have cable, so FNN was desperate to be seen on the air, and we had morning and early afternoon time free after killing the Spanish block.
It was a protracted negotiation, as FNN was stretched financially due to sketchy backers. They wanted us to carry it for free, in exchange for half of the ad time that Rich was supposed to sell. But I didn’t see Rich selling much, so I demanded they pay us an hourly carriage fee and we kept just a few ad slots. Which Rich mostly didn’t sell.
This picture is from the launch of FNN; I’m on the left, BMW driver Rich Lyons is on the right (doesn’t he look like a salesman?), and FNN founder Glen Taylor is in the middle right. He was a sleazy guy (doesn’t he look it?) who had made a very dubious business producing tv programs as tax shelters that never got aired. It turns out he had to resign not many months after FNN went live due to “various legal issues”. Rodney Buchser is next to me; a nice guy Glen hired to oversee FNN’s production in their Santa Monica studio.
Rich and the BMW weren’t around much longer; I fired them both. He was just like his damn BMW: overpriced and under-delivering. Lots of show, and not nearly enough go. The Ultimate Put-On Mobile. I can’t remember what I did with his car; he might have taken over the lease, or we somehow got rid of it.
And the station quickly become very profitable, and I became Maharishi’s new BFF (well, not forever exactly). That’s how it worked in the movement.
As I mentioned earlier, the station had bought four specially-ordered 1980 Skylarks not long before I took over. One of the engineers was still a GM acolyte, and he fell for the new X cars. To his credit, the option box had been duly checked for every possible heavy-duty and performance item, including the 110 hp, 2.8-liter V6, automatic, heavy-duty suspension, higher-effort power steering, wide wheels shod with plump 205 70R-13 “performance” tires, transmission cooler, HD cooling system and anything else that caught his engineer’s fancy. They were loaded, well-equipped for both drivers and passengers, with cruise control, tilt wheel, A/C and other amenities. And being the Limited model trim, they even had the velour loose-pillow seats.
They were all white, and mine had a blue interior. And it turned out to be a pretty good car, without the usual first year X car ailments. It pulled hard (and to one side under full acceleration) and handled pretty well. I wrote up my experiences with one of GM’s Deadly Sins here.
So that was my very direct experience with how BMW became the Ultimate Fashion Direct. But actually, not my first one.
When I first came to LA to work at KSCI, in September of 1977, I needed a place to live. I saw an ad at the TM center for a garage apartment, and went to see it, some blocks south of the Beverly Hills city line. The house was owned by Dolores, my future MIL. She was off in Europe on an advanced TM course (natch), so her daughter (and future soul mate) Stephanie showed me the unit and I rented it.
And what was in the actual garage, under my apartment? A tan 1975 BMW 2002. Dolores, a single mom trying to support four kids as an executive secretary had inherited a bit of money from an aunt that year. She wisely bought the house, and with the remaining money she bought the BMW, on the advice of her son.
I need to mention that Dolores and Stephanie were always impeccably dressed back then. They shopped at the finest stores in Beverly Hills, and had Gucci handbags, Hermes scarves, Ferragamo shoes, cashmere sweaters, silk blouses, etc.. At a time when most American women were unaware of them. As well as BMWs.
Now was a little two door BMW the logical car for a mom and four teenagers? A car whose engine blew up and had to be replaced under warranty? And a car that I had to rescue her from several times when it overheated (repeatedly) or something else broke down? No. But it was so cute, and a BMW, meaning it had to be a really good car, right?
I drove it a couple of times, including up to Mammoth Mountain, and yes, it was a pretty nice drive. It had a stick, fortunately. With four aboard, it was a bit undersprung and underdamped, but it had a nice ride for such a small car, and the engine pulled pretty well. It wasn’t overtly sporty, but that was the reality of European cars back then. They hung in there on rough roads with their supple suspensions, but they were hardly skid-pad terrors.
Dolores wanted out of LA and “retired” to Fairfield, Iowa in 1985, where there is a large TM community. I told her point blank that the BMW was going to be a very bad choice to take with her. Service? Rust? She actually took my advice, for a change. I sold the immaculate-looking 2002 to a kid for his first car. He and his dad came to get it, and the kid was over the moon to find such a nice 2002.
And what did Dolores’ son find as the replacement for her to take to Iowa? A 1970 or 1971 Fury Grand Coupe, with the Mod Top vinyl roof. And under the hood? A 440! Yup; quite the antithesis to the 2002. Drove it a few times; what a beast. She was dubbed “La Bamba”, and it gave her good service chugging around Fairfield for a number of years. When in Iowa, do as the Iowans.
And in West LA…
The next chapter: Auto-Biography – Mercedes 300E and the Birth if Telemundo
Nice story, the 320i always had a bit of a whiff of “All hat, no cattle” about it, it’s a shame we never got the 323i over here. It’s not unattractive at all, it just didn’t deliver the goods. The 2002 on the other hand made BMW’s reputation and the E30 afterwards, at least a few years in once the 325i (as opposed to e) was released sealed the 3-series’ rep for good.
I would have been looking for my first car in the same general area when you sold that 2002 but that would never have been in the cards for me. I did have a girl in my class with a pristine 2002tii (that I think has increased in value every year since) and there was a 320i or two in the parking lot as well and one in the teacher’s lot too and several new E30 318i’s.
Great story, Paul! In 1982, in Reno, I was dating a girl who had been driving a perfectly fine ’72 VW Beetle. She moved from TV talent to TV sales and immediately swapped the Beetle for a BMW 320i. Needless to say, the commissions for a junior time sales person at the third-rated TV station in Reno in 1982 weren’t going to match the payment, insurance and maintenance.
Everyone disses the 320i but looking at in context it was still a good car compared to everything else being built. The malaise era was the double whammy of the mandate for both better fuel economy and decreased emissions which are for the most part mutually exclusive things. The build quality of the BMW was impeccable. the materials first rate and ergonomics were the best. The cars were fuel injected so they drove well and the decrease to 1.8 liters also included catalytic convertors which helped driveability.
The car may have been a let down from the 2002 but what manufacturer didn’t have a let down from their 70’s vehicles to their 80’s vehicles?
“what manufacturer didn’t have a let down from their 70’s vehicles to their 80’s vehicles?”
Toyota, Honda and to a lesser extent, Mazda and Datsun
Toyotas and Hondas did not perform better than a BMW….sure they performed better than their predecessors from the early 70’s but thats a pretty low bar
He was answering your question: what cars didn’t have a letdown from their 70s to their 80s cars.
Ummm… SAAB Turbo? Just sayin’!
Fun tale for a rainy Sunday morning.
Not long ago I overheard several young women, early 20s I’d guess, discussing cars.
“I’m a BMW person” one proclaimed.
The other two were undecided if they were Mercedes or Lexus people.
I don’t know if its a browser thing but most of these pictures are blank.
Most of them? The 320i magazine ad is misbehaving for some reason, but the others are there for me on Firefox and Chrome.
It seems like all your personal pictures aren’t loading for me. Your latest post also doesn’t show anything for me. I’ve tried it with my Windows 10 laptop on Firefox and my Chromebook with Chrome and neither are loading the pictures.
Maybe you better power down and boot up again. Apparently not happening to anyone else.
I’m experiencing the same issues as Edward… most of these pictures plus the Oversteer pic aren’t showing for me… either on my laptop or phone.
Bizarre. Does that include the images of the curbside 320i?
They work on both my desktop with either Firefox and Chrome, and my Chromebook. And my phone.
I have no idea…
This post is working great for me on a new laptop with W10 and Chrome for reference.
I rebooted and still have the same issue.
The curbside 320i pic does not appear. The only pictures here I can see are the IVC-9000, the KSCI image, the 2002 on a pedestal, and the Fuselage. The rest are blank, and when I click on the blank image, I get an error message saying:
“Sorry, the parameters you provided were not valid”
Oddly, the Oversteer image does not show up on my laptop, but it does appear on my phone. The BMW pics don’t show up on either.
It’s working for me now, but this morning I had the same problem with the same pictures.
In the late 1970s, in junior high, I thought the 320i was great!
I wish we had one–it was brisk (for the times) and got good mpg, looked good–it looked “modern” compared to the 2002 (which I liked as a kid in Greece). What wasn’t too like? Oh, the price…$7700…what a base DeVille cost in 1977. Or a Corvette. A Trans Am was around $5500. So, the BMW was a lot of money. Even then I was frugal…if I had that kind of money, I’d probably get a Scirocco ($4995 in 76) or a Trans Am (similar price).
Fast forward to 1982. That summer, I had great teen summer job (for me)–I worked at Constant Sound, installing car stereos. I was the ‘kid’ in the group, so I did mostly cheaper stereos in cheaper cars. I also would occasionally deliver the cars to the customers (which I liked!), or drive the car from the front of the building to the back (our ‘service area’ was outdoors covered by a big tarp, 3 slots in back).
So, one day a 320i came in for some kind of upgrade. I was directed to brink the car to the back.
I just drove it around the building. Yet in that 200 foot drive, I was so impressed!
The car had manual steering, but it was not heavy…and the clutch felt so smooth, the shifter so nice…..right then, I decided, everything I’d ever read about BMWs was true, and $7700 in 1977 was worth it.
The 320i was a very nice car. I didn’t want to come across as dissing it. I would have loved to have one of these with the 5 speed.
When I write an Auto-Biography, it’s inevitably subjective: the specific context of this car and how I was exposed to it, turned me off at the time. I could tell this guy Rich was an empty suit, and I resented his ability to demand such a nice car for just showing up.He represented everything I saw wrong with the management of the station at the time. Which is why I led a palace coup, and things changed quickly thereafter.
This story is about one of associations, not an objective look at the 320i, which like all BMWs had a lot going for it, although I did hold it against them for not bringing the brilliant 323i to the states.
In other words, KSCI hired the local version of Herb Tarlek without the tacky suits…
I still don’t understand why folks saddled a sporting machine like the 320i with an automatic. That always sucks the soul right out of the car.
I was thinking the same while Paul was describing that guy. Herb drove a Cordoba with rich Corinthian leather, as I recall.
At least a Cordoba was good at what it was supposed to do.
The ultimate advertising machine, BMWs always look great in the brochures and they look kinda cool or did years ago, I fell for it and when looking for a replacement for my Amon tuned Corona test drove a couple one was the fout 1.8 manual nice slick shifting little weapon but it had no turn in ability and little acceleration the next a 32? the badge was broken had a six and went better but steered even worse I had three two lane roundabouts on my test course and those two cars could not take them under power in one lane, next up was a great recent paint job on a Pug 306 TDI it not only went better but it cornered on rails it also pulled alarmingly left going straight and was missing the side trim down the right side, gawd knows what prompted the new paint but I didnt want that actual car but going backwards in the handling and performance from the Corona to a small BMW just to get a manual wasnt going to happen either.
The ones you drove must have had bicycle tyres on the front. Mine turned in and gripped like a leech. Admittedly, it took more steering lock than was expected, but once used to that, I do not remember ever understeering in the thing. I WAS twice caught out by oversteer, a bit of a shock, but I was over-driving it.
I have driven two other 6 cyl 3 series, and both were noticeably heavier in the front – in the fours, the engine sits behind the front axle line – but they turned in very well.
I have fond memories of these. A buddy’s mom had one in high school (late eighties early nineties) that he got to borrow on occasion. It was a 77 with a 4 cylinder and possibly the 1.8 litre with fuel injection and a 4 speed manual. In his hands it could do some impressive James Garner inspired maneuvers. Probably helped by the fact he didn’t have to pay for repairs or insurance.
One night we took it out for a joy ride. Pushed it down the block. A helpful jogger helped us push it about a half a block, we jumped in and buddy started the car. The look on the joggers face was priceless. We forgot to take the Bob Marley tape out of the deck and he got busted the next day. Shortly after his mom bought him an old suburban.
He inherited it a few years later and it kept going long after it had any right to. He got the seats recovered in leather and shortly after parked it at a buddy’s farm where the mice ruined the interior. Not sure what happened to it after that (mid 2000’s).
It’s interesting how BMW’s transformation to the Ultimate Fashion Direct happened WHILE the brand was near its peak being the Ultimate Driving Machine.
I remember a similar experience to yours in the late 1980s. At that time, my mom worked as a secretary in a law firm, and her boss was a partner named Mr. Wexler. He was a 1980s lawyer out of central casting like your Mr. Lyons. Mr. Wexler dressed in expensive suits, lived in a huge custom-built house that had white carpeting and white furniture throughout it, and had a miserable wife whom he couldn’t keep happy with all the gifts in the world. He was the farthest thing in the world from a car enthusiast… and in 1986 he bought a 528e automatic.
Not to be outdone, one of the firm’s other partners bought a 535i. These choices seemed odd to me at the time — these BMWs had pretty stark interiors, the 528e was slow (I did drive it a few times), and it seemed like these law partners couldn’t possibly enjoy their cars’ actual attributes.
But at the time, a BMW was the trendy thing to buy. So they bought one. I guess before long, such buyers outnumbered enthusiasts, so BMW’s future course was set. I even now, when I see 1980s-era 5 series BMWs, I always think of Mr. Wexler and his white-carpeted home.
Was BMW really ever “The Ultimate Driving Machine?” Sure, they made some very nice cars, but that moniker was obviously created by an ad agency. I don’t see them as having lived up to it most of the time. Some of their top performance models were in the running, but not their bread-and-butter versions.
It was a very successful brand building campaign.
True that many BMWs didn’t live up to the moniker, though given that the “Ultimate Driving Machine” ad campaign was introduced in 1975, I can’t think of another mass-produced make of that era that could hold more of a claim to producing driver’s cars.
Alfa Romeo? Porsche?
I’m not dissing BMW per se. They made a lot of nice cars in the day. I liked them. But there were two issues:
1. they didn’t bring the superb 323i six cylinder to the US. That was a genuine Driving Machine.
2. folks gobbled them up, including the weak-chested 320i/318i and the 528e because they were the in thing to be seen in. That’s ok, except that it watered down their early image in the eyes of enthusiasts. It’s one of the reasons I bought a ’83 TBird Turbo Coupe.I wasn’t going to spend that kind of money to get such a weak-chested car. And look like another poseur.
I’m curious among BMW owners, who actually enjoys their cars’ actual attributes. At least in Seattle, BMW has overtaken the Prius in being the official LLB (Left Lane Bandit) car on the freeway. I see tons of expensive BMWs driven like malaise era Broughams.
Yes, and at a red light I’ll pick the lane with the BMW and as often as not get frustrated.
Well I have to say it was a nice car for it’s time as my mother had one in 1980 I believe. I would never call that car a status symbol at all. It handled decently compared to others at the time. Not quick but neither was the Mercedes 300D which was a status symbol in the Bay Area back then. LOL, it was a Mom’s car and my Mom definitely never had any airs about her.
Maybe I was around it day after day so to me it was common place? Maybe because it was a four cylinder like the Celica of the day and so they seemed similar? Maybe because I would lift weights at the house of my father’s friend and in the garage was a BMW 730. Yep, that was probably it as I rarely saw a 730 anywhere at all. In 1980 that was a “car.”
I’m always fascinated by this chapter of your life, Paul.
It’s funny how prestige and image can make people buy something completely different from what prestige and image did 20 years before. You’ve painted a good picture here.
And also make them buy something which is totally unsuited, like one of these 320s with an automatic!
Everyone should read the 1980 Car and Driver review of the 320i….They loved it.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15142660/1980-bmw-320i-archived-instrumented-test/
Again these cars have to be looked at in the context of the auto industry at the time. Emissions, economy and safety.
An excerpt fro CandD:
Its 0-to-60-mph time of 9.8 seconds is 0.2 second slower than before, but the new 320i pulls out an advantage of 0.6 second and almost 2 mph by the end of a quarter-mile. It will also reach 90 mph 4 seconds quicker than before—though its 105-mph top speed is off by 4 mph.
Those figures are all the more impressive when you realize that they were turned in by a car tuned to the freshly tightened 1980 exhaust-emissions standards—requirements that have squeezed the life out of more than a few engines this year.
I think the fact that they went to a 5-speed gearbox with much lower gearing and then added an overdrive 5th gear to it to make it bearable on the freeway is what makes most of the difference (or minimization of loss, depending on how it’s looked at.). That 1.8l wouldn’t be as good with the 4-speed from the prior year, or the 2.0l would have been better with the 5-speed, it’s not the engine making the difference here. Either way, as mentioned above, the 323i would have gone a long way toward making BMW more reflective of their marketing.
The gearing and the transmission did make a difference but also the addition of the catalytic converter…..Remember every manufacturer was trying to strike the balance between fuel economy, emissions and performance….BMW did a pretty good job with the 320i going from 19mpg to 25mpg…as good as a Scirocco.
Plus what car was being sold in America that was rwd with fully independent suspension and a fuel injected engine?
Well, technically VW had BMW beat by over a decade with the Squareback in that case, it had FI and semi-trailing arm rear suspension by ’69 but was discontinued before the E21 saw the light of day…
Porsche 924, 928
Peugeot 504, 505
There’s probably some others but yeah it wasn’t common for at least several more years. As an aside apparently the 323i didn’t come over due to that engine not meeting emissions limits, bummer. I didn’t realize the 320i had thermal reactors instead of catalytic converters prior to 1980 either, interesting.
The thermal reactors is why it got such crappy mileage. The engine had to run rich to light up the reactors.
The excuse given is that they coiuldn’t get the 323 six to meet emissions. of course they could have, if they had put the time and effort into it. Why not?
It was a marketing decision, due to the high gas prices and CAFE. Everyone thought Americans only wanted high-mileage fuel savers.
A buudy of mine has a E21 323….Being a grey market car it’s a hassle keeping it running properly and finding parts…..It is too bad that BMW didn’t put their resources into federalizing it. With a proper theree way catalyst it may have run as well as the 320 but as Paul said BMW didn’t see the market…They did years later with the E30 325i
The Financial News Network, if they continued, may have had to change their logo due to copyright conflicts with the Federal Department of Transportation. 🙂
Department of Transportation logo…
Paul, you have again outdone yourself. What an excellent article.
BMW is a miracle of modern marketing, German style. They have always managed to pass off their product as premium, better to drive and worth the extra money. They do it with class leading style and design, again German style.
Yet Germans have very little time for them. Only about 10% of all BMW’s built are sold in Germany. Germans love their cars and know their country and see that BMW is not a good buy for the money. While it is a nice car, it is not worth the extra premium to own one. This was my impression when I test drove a 323i last year.
China accounts for the largest single market for BMW, about a quarter of all cars sold. The real thing is the cars BMW sells in China-all big money stuff, from the X5 up. The Chinese people I know who drive BMW products don’t remotely care about anything other logo on the hood. That’s a pretty dangerous thing for BMW because tastes in China flip on a dime.
BMW was in third place for sales in Germany for 2018, up one place from 2017. Germany’s population is about 82 million people, about a quarter of the US’s.
Remember that BMW (like Audi) doesn’t sell a single utility vehicle (real utility I mean like a cargo van or vanette) unlike the makers in first, second, fifth, and sixth place. VW and MB have multiple options and thus sales in this space.
Share
1. VW 18.7% 643k sales
2. M-B 9.3%
3. BMW 7.7%
4. Audi 7.4%
5. Ford 7.3%
6. Opel 6.6%
7. Skoda 5.7%
8. Renault 3.8%
9. Seat 3.5%
10. Hyundai 3.3%
Total volume across ALL brands, not just top 10 above was 3,435,778
https://www.best-selling-cars.com/germany/2018-full-year-germany-best-selling-car-manufacturers-and-brands/
BMW sold 639,953 units in China in 2018.
https://www.best-selling-cars.com/china/2018-international-german-luxury-car-sales-worldwide-and-in-china/
It was 261,051 in Germany.
China is where the money is.
Well of course, I would hope so. Their population is a little larger than Germany’s. My point was that their market share in Germany is at least where, if not higher than, one would expect based on the available options. The Germans in general seem to like BMW just fine.
I believe BMW is also currently (and has been for several years) the #1 exporter of American-made vehicles (many if not most to China), although this may be changing as I believe they are looking at other locations now for further production expansion.
It’s surprising – but not really – that Ford and (especially) Opel have fallen so far, the latter was traditionally #2 behind VW but that was prior to M-B’s big push downmarket.
Just for fun, the 2018 numbers for the EU, registered new cars:
Ford 974,856
Opel/Vauxhall 869,054
Mercedes-Benz 838,358
BMW 778,343
For comparison reasons: almighty Volkswagen 1,698,084
I bought a ’77 BMW 320i 4 speed stick in 1989. It was a well maintained car, nothing like the beater shown. The interior was a bit stark. No malaise era car here! It seemed fast enough for a 4 banger, but a road hugging machine it was not. On long sweeping curves the inside back tire would lift and with out a limited slip diff. the tire would spin in the air ,slowing the car down immediately. You couldn’t really hurt yourself. The cure was to disconnect the rear sway bar as it was too stiff and kept the inside tire in the air according to those in the know. It was not very fuel efficient either, with the full time mechanical fuel injection. But I enjoyed the car for the 4 years I owned it.
My older brother bought a new 1980 320I with a five speed and a/c. It had no power equipment, the windows and sunroof were all manual. The interior was very plain,but well laid out, covered in vinyl. The quality and assembly were first rate. I bought a three year old ’77 Coupe de Ville. It was quite a comparison. The ’77 CdV was the newest downsized design. It was the best Caddy in twenty years, capable and comfortable. Though it was nicely built, the materials used were not authentic. Fake chromed metal, fake wood, fake wire wheels, etc. Still it was a very good car. I was 25 years old at the time and a long time Cadillac fan. I couldn’t imagine many young guys besides myself who would choose the Cadillac. The 320I was just a basic very honest car. It was great to drive and my brother put over 250,000 miles on it. And it had the image that made you look like a very smart young man on his way up. Not a bad look.
My dad bought my mom a brand new white 1980 320i for her birthday that year. 5 speed, steel wheels, no power equipment, manual windows, no sunroof, no a/c, light cloth interior, no radio! Dad was very thrifty, bought and installed a radio himself. No rocket ship, but lacking any options, relatively light and lively. Good fuel economy. Mom drove it until 2015, when she sold it to a grandson. He and I drove it to Monterey Historics 2015, where BMW was the featured marque at its 100th birthday. 2017, nephew sold it to a father and son in , who planned to continue mechanical restoration. A garaged California car, it had no rust. Photo with the only other E21s in attendance that year, the very desirable Alpina 6 cylinder variants.
Correction: Monterey Historics 2016.
I am a little late to this one. The first time BMW worked its way into my consciousness was in the late 70s when they were running TV ads for the 320i. They were notable for the actor playing the slightly haughty upper-crust character and the setting of the kind of place where there are horse stables somewhere (along with low-wage grunts to take care of them). So BMW was flogging this thing as a luxury car/fashion accessory early on.
I was a short-time BMW-head in the mid 80s and developed the same idea of many here – that the 320 was kind of a tweener. The 2002 was roundly respected and the then-new 3 series was widely adored. The 320 was seen as inferior as a road car to the 2002 and out of date as a fashion item so it really had a very small fan base by then.
My Dad gave my sister one of these in high school. It was a few years old and had an automatic. Naturally, as a mullet-wearing Chevelle driver, I made fun of it constantly. Yuppie in training car. Oddly, Karen didn’t care for it much either and got a Wolfsburg Edition Scirocco with a 5-speed. She kept that thing until it collapsed.
I love reading these write ups which I see as a peak into bygone era. I am not a business fellow so these insights into companies are enlightening. I still see a few 1980s BMWs in Oregon though mostly in the Portland area and sometimes they reinvent themselves to become another sort of fashion statement.
I like the vintage Nova and school buses. I almost always try to photograph old school buses when I find them.
I want to say BMW became a fashionable brand pretty early on in SoCal. When I came to graduate school at UCLA in Fall 1972 I was surprised to see many 2002’s in campus garages – faculty and students were driving them. I was minimally acquainted with the nameplate – I don’t think I ever saw a BMW in IN while I was growing up. One of my first friends at UCLA had a new 1972 2002 with automatic and A/C. She was a trust fund kid. It was my first ride in a BMW and I was very impressed with the fit and finish and use of space. IIRC it wasn’t terribly fast and the (Behr?) A/C wasn’t up to par but otherwise I liked the car a lot.
BTW my friend’s car was from Vasek Polak’s large dealership in Hermosa Beach. He was a race car enthusiast and major importer of European cars on the west coast. The SoCal market for BMW was already expanding when I arrived in 72.
Q: What’s the difference between a BMW and a haemorrhoid?
A: None – every asshole gets one in the end.
Just ask the man who had one – me. (A Bimmer, natch. How rude of you).
Mine was also an expensive underpowered status symbol (late ’90’s manual 318i), but, like the one belonging Mr Lyons, it looked really good and the drive was very sweet indeed. Just not rushed. Such solidity, such nice controls, such balance and ride. The ownership was not at all sweet, but as I found out, BM’s have about 100K (60mi) in them before a sensible user bails. Persisting to 150K, the expensively-kept thing was falling into the road, mechanically and electrically, and taking my bank account with it.
I’ll confess I test-drove mine as a fashion accessory, out of curiosity, but bought it because I really liked it. It’s an outside chance, but perhaps Mr Rich Lines, sorry, Lyons, did his too.
This thoroughly fascinating article is also perhaps about cars and their irrational associations. I loved the E 34 5 series, till being screwed over by the owner of one, a colleague with some rich lines that I fell for. After that, I can’t see these very worthy cars as anything but transport for vain and greedy dissemblers.
In the mid 90s my youngest brother had a thing for a BMW when he was going to get his first car in high school. Around here, everything within the budget my father set was old and rusty. Matt found one and he and dad took it into a shop to have it checked out. There happened to be a guy in the waiting room who was skilled working on BMWs. The guy looked out into the shop and (without knowing who these people were) said “My God, is that a rusty BMW. Who in the hell would want to own a rusty BMW. What a money pit that has to be.”
My father was doing his best to keep from busting out in a combination of laughter and “I told you so”. They got a Buick LeSabre that had been traded in by a senior citizen. 🙂
I love that story. I bought a vaguely disastrous Euro for car no. 1, and, fortune having rid me of that pestilence without extreme financial imposition, I nearly purchased a worn ’67 Beetle. My lovely yet cautious father went round to look briefly at the Bug (two streets away), and came back heartily extolling the virtues of the boring but rather sweet senior citz Falcon that was for sale just round the corner.
Partly because I knew I’d need my dad’s early-’30’s generation expertise to keep any car of mine alive then, I bought that Falcon. And of course, it served me well. And dad never boasted once.