(first posted 5/21/2011. Curbside Duett shots posted at the Cohort by Robert Adair)
To understand the Swedes’ love for the station-wagon, one has to go back to the war, the second world war. Much of the Swedish economy was built upon the fact that the country hadn’t been ravished by the war. When other countries made tanks and gunships, the Swedes developed cars for the glorious post war society they were sure would be built upon the rubble and ruins of Europe. Swedes were not going to spend their post-war years squeezed into tiny bubble cars. And in addition to proper family-sized cars, a roomy station wagon was called for.
The Volvo PV444 was presented in 1944, with deliveries started in 1947.
The Saab 92 came out to market in 1949. Those two cars and the Volkswagen were the cars of choice for the Swedish people throughout the fifties. Though they were very popular, they weren’t exactly the most practical cars. The Saab didn’t even have an externally available luggage compartment for the first few years. Something had to be done.
Though the Volvo PV444 was of unibody construction, there was some pressure from the commercial sector to make chassis available for conversions. In 1949 Volvo presented a separate chassis on a ladder frame, it came equipped with engine, hood, front wings, front bulkhead and dashboard. Outside coach builders made use of that and built various specials, like wagons, pickup trucks, fire engines and ambulances.
There were even some convertibles built, much in the style of the Chrysler Town & Country woodie convertibles, though on a lower scale.
Pickup trucks.
And roomy station wagons. Those were not the kind of crude Epa-conversions I talked about before, but outsourced factory approved coachbuilt conversions, and therefore they were quite expensive. Market pressure then made it easier for Volvo to develop a less expensive wagon of their own, with an all steel body on the commercial chassis. The tell tale between the versions are the rudimentary rear wings often fitted to the coachbuilt cars, where the factory version is rather clean and slab sided.
The new factory-built wagon was presented in 1953 as the Volvo PV 445, colloquially called the “Duett”, with the dual purpose of being used both “for work and pleasure”. It was marketed to artisans, craftsmen, shop-owners, and the likes, people who needed a practical wagon to make deliveries on week days, with the need to haul the family down to the beach or summer house come weekends. And as practical cars go, it was essentially the only one of its kind and therefore seen in much use.
It was also the car of choice for the various branches of the Swedish government. The bright orange cars from the national telephone company Televerket were a common sight, I remember seeing those in practical use up into the early 1980’s. Other large fleet buyers were the national railroad company SJ, who had their cars painted red with contrasting black front wings, while the national post office had their cars painted a bright yellow with contrasting black front wings.
The PV445 was modernized in parallel to its sedan counterpart; in 1960 it received a minor facelift and became the P210. At the same time, production of bare commercial chassis ended after some 4000 had been produced. In 1962, the 120-series “Amazon” station wagon was presented. It was a rather expensive solution due to the fact that it was of unibody construction.
The design staff virtually had to carve out a completely new rear end, from the B-pillars and back, with specially made rear doors, rear wings, a new roof, and a bi-split rear tail-gate. Because of that, it became more of an upscale family car, thus relegating the Duett to work horse capacity only.
And boy, did it see much of that. Not in the horse and buggy but more in the oxcart kind of style. People mistreated their cars in the most sadistic kind of way and still expected every car to do its duty. I wouldn’t be surprised if Volvos reputation for quality wasn’t built upon the sheer beatings those cars were capable of withstanding.
It honed the people into the practical use of wagons and paved the way for generations upon generations of family haulers in Sweden, making the station wagon the most common car in the country.
In 1968, the Volvo 145 station wagon was presented. Interestingly enough, that year saw three overlapping generations of Volvo wagons being made, with that year being the final model year for the Amazon wagon. In 1969, the Duett was finally phased out, with a tally of roughly 90 000 cars produced.
The demise of the Duett left a hole for more practical cars in the line-up, and as a replacement of sorts the rather curious 145 Express was presented in 1970. The ten inch roof extension and larger tail-gate was made out of fiberglass, and simply just tacked on during production. With time, it has garnered a sort of cult following in Sweden.
When trying to describe the Volvo Duett, I keep looking for comparisons. But in the hearts and minds of the Swedish people there really isn’t anything like it, it transcends description. It’s like a Jeep Station Wagon but not as rugged, or like a Land Rover but without four-wheel drive.
It has hippie connotations like a VW Bus, it has surfer credibility like a woodie wagon, it has anti-society vibes like a Citroen driven by a bunch of angry communists. It is unadorned like the girl next door, it is unpretentious like an Ikea dining room set, it is rugged and reliable as Sancho Panchas mule, and it is homely like a well worn Birkenstock.
It is an anti-car made for those that knows that quality always wins over style, it is simply one of the most practical cars ever made.
A very interesting piece.I’ve always liked the PV444, and still wonder if the pseudo-american styling is copied from anything in particular.
Regarding the separate chassis version , what on earth is a torpedo?
I feel the 145 wagon was let down by the wrongly shaped window glass in the rear passenger doors.
Sorry about that, it’s a swenglishicism. A torpedo is simply a front bulkhead. I didn’t check on the usage, because I was sure that the expression existed at least in UK English. I’ll change that immediately.
Etymologically speaking, I guess the expression has its roots in naval warfare. A torpedo bulkhead (on boats) is a bulkhead capable of withstanding a torpedo detonation. As the expression of bulkheads are carried over to cars, I guess the torpedo connotations followed suit, at least in swedish.
Thank you for that.
“swenglishicism.” is a wonderful new word to me ( bit like supercalafragionisticc.etc)
I should add that I don’t think I have ever seen a PV444 ( I have a picture in a car mag I bought in the late 50s) and I have never heard of the Deutt before.I am not sure I ever saw an Amazon wagon – even the saloons were rare enough in England.
Interesting that you brought forward the question of the rear doors on the 145, because I will include that particular little design trait in my next piece, the story of a designers dilemma. Look no further than after the weekend for an answer.
Those carried forward to the last 1993 245 wagons. I grew up with many 240s, 740s and have a V50 today. I am pretty sure of the rationale with those doors but don’t want to spoil your future article.
Funny, the exact same word is used in Uruguay for exactly the same part, the bulkhead. The name for the piece of ordnance is also “torpedo”.
I would just about give my left testicle for one of those
What a great article to read over my huckleberry (bilberry) pancakes! I have always loved these Duett wagons, and would have owned one if it had happened to come my way. I lusted over the red and white one a friend had. They were not very common over here, but one would see them from time to time.
The Duett’s counterpart in the US would have to be the Chevy Suburban and its equivalent. They were much smaller then than today, but of course somewhat bigger than the Volvo. But their relative scale corresponds to the typical ratio of size between American and European cars back then.
I still need to do a piece on the history of Peugeot wagons, which in my mind are the ultimate station wagons, or certainly give the Duett a good run for the title. They were more sophisticated in their construction (unibody) and rear suspension.
Yeah, I was thinking of the Suburban as comparison. But I simply don’t know how common that car actually was as a family vehicle. The point of the Duett was that it was more than just being a sedan delivery, it served dual purpose as a family car as well.
Certainly not as much as in Sweden, because there were so many other more traditional wagons. And in the fifties, Americans were caught up in the ever-lower look, even in wagons. But there was a slice of the market that appreciated the Suburban’s (and other truck-based wagons) greater utility.
Paul , surely the 504 wagon ( the daddy of Peugeot wagons) had unibody construction and a live rear axle , same as the 445 ?
I am back in blighty today , and it is a bit of a culture shock – Diesel fuel costs more than Petrol !
The Duett isn’t unibody; body on frame. And it’s rear axle is the same basic leaf-spring axle as on the 444/544 sedan.
The daddy of Peugeot wagons would be the 403; the first in a long line of long-wheelbase Pug wagons that were unibody, but had their own unique rear axle/suspension. We’ll get to it..
Wikipedia says the PV444 had unibody with coil springs in the rear, while the Duett had a body on frame and leaf springs. However, they shared engines and front suspensions with each other, and upgrades following each other.
Yikes; I shot from the hip on that one. That makes Volvo a bit of a pioneer in that arrangement; not too common then.
That arrangement sounds like the mid-late 80’s relationship between my Jeep Comanche and its sister, the Jeep Cherokee.
Don’t we have some brickheads amongst our midst? Perhaps they could clearify, because I can’t remember how it really looks like. Road & Track tested the PV 444 and said this about it:
“The solid rear axle is located by a long rubber-insulated trailing arm on each side and uses coil springs.”
R&T pdf: http://www.su-filters.com/pv444l-rt.pdf
Here’s a picture of it. Coils and control arms. Like so many American (and European) cars from the sixties on.
Had a 97 406 wagon Paul beautiful car to drive ride in etc 2.1 diesel motor fast but a brittle valvetrain easlly pull 1.5tonne the last of the line started by 403, great cars for roadholding and comfort French cars are in a league of their own,
Cool article on a cool vehicle. A PV444 was the first Volvo I ever saw or rode in. When I was a little kid, we had a neighbor who was an executive at Dana axle. He would periodically drive home for a weekend with what he called “test cars”. When I saw the Volvo, I had absolutely no idea what it was – my best guess was an old VW. Wrong. I got to go for a ride. My only memory of it was that it seemed much older than what we were used to then, although in the early 60s it was probably a nearly new car.
My thing for wagons makes the Duett my new second-favorite of this series. But the one I really want is that blue convertible.
Awesome. Simply awesome.
I spotted a flat black Duett at a car show a couple weeks ago. It was sporting a 302 though.
Here it is.
Ah, flat black. The one I had didn’t have a 302, but a B20 from a 144. That was mighty fun indeed. Interestingly, the rear wings in that black car is an after market tack on. I can’t for my life understand why one would want one there, because the car looks so clean without them.
I suspect that with the 302, it has a bigger rear end, but maybe just bigger wheels and tires.
I hate it when someone takes a great, practical car and turns it into an impractical show car. Pretty much when a chevy small block is involved in any way with a classic car actually.
gotta agree. it’s usually a travesty to put a small block chevy in a european car. if the car was trashed first, well maybe but otherwise eave it alone!
I’d disagree with that. Unless the original drivetrain is in great shape, if the car is in the USA it is probably quite impractical to find parts and expertise to make it run or to improve its performance. A small-block Chevy or Ford or even better on of the GM LSx series of engines and a modern transmission is a good way to keep the “classic” car running or to improve it’s performance.
I remember here in Australia back around ’70 some guy put a Simca four in a Honda S600 after the Honda four blew up – and thinking how wrong that was!
thanks, ingvar for the very enjoyable history lesson. i really love volvos, especialy the wagons. i just rebuilt the transmission on my ’02 xc70 after aamco apparently put in the wrong kind of transmission fluid. sigh… serves me right for getting such a fancy modern car. if i had a duett, i never would have had that problem!
question for y’all. what should someone who wants a practical station wagon buy today? i like the v50 but other that that, volvo seems to have lost the plot…
I have an ’06 V50. Nice car, I traded an S70 for it, it was one year old with CPO warranty. Got the 2.4i with front wheel drive as I didn’t want any turbo or AWD headaches. It’s been a pretty good car. I think new ones are turbo-only now, at least in the US.
Guys…. our family has a XC70 which we got as a low mileage lease return. Have any wisdom regarding this car? I love it… in fact the Rubbermaid motif dash is lovely IMO. Anything we should be on the lookout for?? Besides the ridiculous dealer service rate?
Perhaps all the Curbside Classic readers already know this, but Ingvar uses another European phrase in this statement:
“The tell tale between the versions are the rudimentary rear wings often fitted to the coachbuilt cars, where the factory version is rather clean and slab sided.”
For US readers, “rear wings” translates to “rear fenders”.
As a scandinavian, we are taught English in school. The thing is, it’s the Queen’s English, the English they talk in England. So, it’s very likely I will keep making mistakes, because I constantly keep mixing up the American English and UK English idioms. Like hood/bonnet, wings/fenders, and so on and so forth. English isn’t my first language, but my second, so sometimes I don’t notice the difference. I hope you’ll forgive me…
They’re not “mistakes”. And they add colour to CC. No apologies needed.
Don’t worry Ingvar, we understand, and we appreciate hearing from someone like you who has experienced these cars that we may never have seen, first hand.
Seconded. Actually it didn’t even jump out at me when I read it. In Canada we got a healthy dose of British culture growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, and working for a Finnish company I experience a lot of Finglish at work, which is probably similar to Swenglish…
Finnish is a Uralic language, related to Estonian, Lappish, and (more distantly) Hungarian. No connection to Swedish, which is Indo-European.
Having visited Europe, I now appreciate that Brit English rules there, because
1) Proximity: Britain is closer & thus probably has more itinerant English teachers available. Also note that BBC has long been broadcast internationally;
2) It is reasonable that Europeans should look to its original source for a standard.
American English, apart from its inevitable colloquial & ethnic departures, was also influenced by Noah Webster, who made a point of “improving” the language in his influential dictionary. Whether he succeeded or not is a matter of opinion.
BTW, I like British auto jargon. “Damper” is much more descriptive than “shock absorber.”
We also had a lot of exchange students with the US. Swedes going to the US, and the other way around. And as my English teacher told us, it was okey to use American English in class, but only if we were consistent, and knew the difference.
But for me, it’s all just a blur. Because I can’t remember what idiosyncracies belongs in which camp. Is it tomato here and tomatoe there, or how was it? And so on…
Yup, and Noah Webster didn’t help by changing a lot of spelling, making a bad situation even worse. I pity non-native English speakers, it’s a tall order to get it all right.
We must remember, however, that dictionaries are a relatively recent innovation in history. I imagine that common publications like Bibles served as an informal standard before these.
The American comedian Gallagher (popular in the ’80s) did a hilarious bit on the unpredictability of English pronunciation. One should be able to find it on YouTube.
And “Strangler” sounds better than “Choke”. Years ago I had a factory service manual for a TR2. Was a lot of fun reading the difference in terminology of the parts of the car.
No problem, Ingvar. You’re taught English as the rest of the world speaks it. America seems to rule the internet, however, but us Aussies and the Kiwis have no problems with your English! 🙂
+1
That “torpedo” chassis had a very modern, safe location for the fuel tank. Impressive for a 60-year-old design.
After a brief and violent 2 month relationship with a 1962 Vauxhall Victor, I bought what I like to remember as my first car, a bright red 1965 Volvo 544.
For a student in 1969, the $900 price tag meant a contribution from my mother, for which I will always be grateful. With a B-18 engine and only 50 000 miles, it was the car of my dreams for 3 years. I can still remember the growl of that amazingly aggressive four cylinder motor, downshifting into a corner on a warm summer night, windows open. The shifter was a delight, requiring only two fingers to flip it from third back into fourth, even though the gearshift knob seemed to be placed, strangely, somewhere up around shoulder height. Mechanically it never let me down, but unfortunately the body was no match for the road salt of a Nova Scotia winter. Within a year a hole had appeared in the fender above the right rear wheel, and in another two years the trunk had virtually disappeared. RIP sweet hoodlum.
Does anyone have either a supplier of replacement Duett Chassis, or the prints for the original chassis design? Looking to build a replacement for a project.
In 1967 Volvo made their first run of 2,500 of the 140 series with four-wheel disc brakes, Limited slip differential, twin SU carburetors (102 hp) and an optional 5th gear electric overdrive. I picked an Arctic Blue sedan and drove it for 20 years, just shy of 400,000 miles. I actually miss the old dog.
http://bringatrailer.com/2012/08/23/1967-volvo-duett-210/
I had the good fortune to pilot a ’62 544 through my college years and always wanted to score one of the 210 Duett Wagons. They were very rare and I only spotted them in Southern California – San Diego & Orange Counties – where they’d been enlisted for ‘surf’ duty.
I do love classic Volvos. I shortly owned a PV 444 when living in the UK in my twenties, then bought an unbeatable 245 Delivery with six cylinder diesel engine and all possible upgrades like leather heated seats, electric windows, alloy wheels, tinted glasses and a vynil-covered roof, that lasted forever. I rebuilt the engine once after 680.000 kms and when I sold it it had 400k more kms. Then I had a 760 that wasn’t quite the same stuff. I always wanted an Amazon, possibly a SW like the blue one pictured above…
Wonderful cars only let down by the extremely short ratio diff. While a Duett can still move uphill filled with bricks, it always has to rev too high on todays roads. Some were later fittet with overdrives from the 140 to fix this.
I have had a ’67 210 for 34 years. I agree. I wish the rear ratios were a bit
more conducive to higher speed cruising. Still a blast to drive. Here is the story of this car.
http://staffanhussinenglish.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/the-1967-volvo-210-story/
I suppose our British equivalents were the Austin A30 Countryman, Ford 100E Escort, Hillman Husky or Standard Companion.. All were 1950s models based on vans which used saloon car front ends, but were fitted with rear side windows and removeable rear seats.. the Standard even had 4 passenger doors unlike the van (Commer Cob) it was based on. All were much smaller than the Duett though.
No Rootes made the Commer express delivery a long wheelbase Husky/Cob that could come fitted as a wagon, Survivors are rare most got worked into the ground here.
Beat me to it!
There was a similar vehicle based on the Peugeot 203 also, a friend of mine has one that was pulled out of a shed where it had sat for over 30 years. They got it back on the road with some rust repair and mechanical rebuilding, but it has patina by the bucket load.
Awesome story! I’ve always liked station wagons, but my favourites have always been Volvo station wagons. If I could find a nice Volvo Duett, I’d use it for everything from driving my nephews who are between 5 and 8 yrs old to sleeping in it on road trips between Washington, Oregon, and California.
I remember seeing a few old PV-444 sedans as a kid. I thought of them as a more substantial VW, and I guess I wasn’t far off. Micheal J. Fox drove one in “The Frighteners”, and it looked like one tough old car. Sadly, I’ve never seen a Duett, but it’s one European classic I’d love to own. It would be perfect for a cross-Canada road trip. I’d just have to teach my wife to drive a manual so she could take the wheel once in a while. Considering that her dad is a retired long-haul trucker, I’m surprised it doesn’t come naturally – not to mention that his favorite truck is a Volvo. He always goes on about how smooth-riding they are, and having ridden in a few, I can’t argue.
It’s too bad the Volvo Duett never sold here in North America, in particular, the USA.
Thanks for this; I learned a lot.
I am interested in the Duett and all Volvo wagons. I owned a ’73 145. It was not perfect.
The counterpart to the Duett, in my mind, is not a car but one of three airplanes. All are all Canadian and all did the kind of work in Canada and Alaska that was done by Duetts in Scandinavia. Those are the DeHavilland Otter and Beaver plus the Noorduyn Norseman.
A little correction here: while we were producing guns and tanks, Sweden was producing war materials for the Germans. The reason for Sweden’s great success was the money that they made selling to the Germans during World War 2. This was especially true of SKF. After the Schweinfurt raid in Germany in 1944 SKF made a killing supplying the Nazi war machine ball the ball bearings and races. This is where the profits we are hearing from this week originated.
Sweden also supplied Germany with most of it’s iron ore. Without Sweden, Hitler could not have had his war.
Of couse you’re right. It was just a little hyperbole from my part. But by a curious coincidence, my father and my grandfather worked in those very mines that supplied Germany with iron ore and steel during the war. According to William L Shirer and his “The rise and fall of the third reich” those exports prolonged the war with about a year. I have been thinking for a very long time about writing about that, it’s just that it doesn’t have much to do about cars. But I’ve been thinking of spinning it around my grandfather and his Dodge he bought in 1939.
I believe you are referring to “Inside the Third Reich,” by Albert Speer. Shirer was thrown out of Germany in December of 1941 when the Nazis so brilliantly declared war on the USA.
Speer was totally self-serving in both his books and I would take the one year extension of the war with a big grain of salt. Fact is by 1942, (after Soviet supplies, ahem, rather quickly were cut) Germany was getting 90% of its iron ore from Sweden. Germany could not have lasted six months without it.
Speer was also quite candid that German AFV production in particular would have been massively reduced had SKF not quickly supplied the bearings he needed.
No, I was referring to Shirer and that very same book I mentioned. I don’t know about accuracy, and of course there’s a lot of hyperbole in it. But I find his line of thought very intriguing.
Germany wanted to secure the transports of that iron ore from the north of Sweden. And the only way out was by ship through the Baltic Sea, or from Narvik in Norway and the North Sea. In the Baltics, they could be attacked by the Russians from Leningrad. And the Germans were afraid the Allies would occupy Norway pre-emtively. So, instead, the Germans went through Denmark and occupied Norway, pre-emptively instead. Denmark was just collateral in that equation.
I find it very intriguing the Germans invaded two countries, just to secure transports of iron ore from the very same mine my grandfather worked at the very same time. If they had told this story in school, the history lessons would’ve been so much more interesting. Anyway, it’s a story I’ve been thinking on working on.
It is indeed interesting. The Allies actually intended to invade Norway first, but the Germans were reading the French military cipher and launched a preemptive invasion. German command and control were light years ahead of the Allies and they soon overcame any resistance. An interesting aside is the ships lost in Norway made an invasion of England practically impossible.
The Germans bottled up large numbers of troops in Norway, often more than 600,000 as they were keen to defend their iron ore (and lots of other goodies, too) source.
It’s hard to get a feel for size even when spelled out in the article. Before I read the comments I thought that today’s logical comparison would be some of the SUVs from today or the recent past. The 4Runner and Pathfinder seem to me to be of close to the same size and with seats lowered of much the same capacity. Four doors make today’s iteration an upgrade. I had a Saturn Vue that while not constructed nearly rugged enough (for me, at least) would perform the same functions as the Duett. Even the early suburbans look somewhat bigger and memory says that look is accurate.
When I first read this I was very impressed. I may have still been driving the Saturn Vue and I thought this would just have fit my life so well. As always, a light trailer on the back make this work like the big 4 door trucks. It would be more versatile because it could do passenger car duties as well. They look a little light for full time contractor duty. Those thoughts are a big reason I have had more SUVs than trucks or cars since I left full time work in the trades.
Excellent story but you have made my mouth water.
I really like the looks of that dark blue convertible, and don’t know how I missed it the first time around. I’d think there wouldn’t be much of a market for open cars in such a northern climate as Sweden’s, but I do know that a great many 50’s and 60’s American convertibles have found their way there.
My experience with these old Volvos is limited to one ride in town in a black coupe that a friend owned for a while. He was really enthusiastic about it, but didn’t keep it long, trading it for a 1969 Camaro that he was also really enthusiastic about, but didn’t keep long either.
There is another Duett in the Portland area, I photographed this outside my dentist in Beaverton and saw it recently on highway 26 heading towards Hillsboro. The signwriting on the door reads
Surrealist Milliner
abstract solutions to concrete problems
That’s just beautiful. And the perfect car for it…
Some Google research indicates that the roof racks that are evident on many of these examples are original as well.
http://www.influx.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Duett_2.jpg
Yes, and they are bolted in place. Bolted through the roof. So, there’s no way of getting rid of them either.
I like these Duettes I could easily drive one with a diesel powertrain easily harvested from something else, not that I’ll ever find one in NZ they simply didnt come here and would have been horrendously expensive if they had.
First Volvo I remember as a child were the PV444. My parent’s would comment that it looks like a 40’s Ford. That convertible is beautiful. The Duett is really cool. It seems it would have sold well in the US if not priced too high.
There were other similar vehicles at the time, the Skoda Octavia break was used for everything from hauling chickens to even the occasional cow! Czechs were mighty annoyed when Skoda went over to rear engined cars. If any car fulfils the same role as the Duett nowadays it is the current Octavia, unknown in the States I imagine? They’ve rather stolen the limelight from Volvo in the practical estate area.
Id love to own a Duett to go with my 164. After all the Duett could be used for my joinery business weekdays and my 164 at the weekend- Volvo heaven!
I like the roof on that 145 Express. A bit like the Matro Rancho. Not sure about the wheels. Great article.
Does anyone know of a Duett for sale?
For being so popular , why were only 90,000 built before the 145? In 16 years, that’s only 5600/yr? Sounds like should be 900,000?
They were very popular in Sweden, a small country, and back then, cars were hardly universal. The Duett was only sold in small numbers outside of Sweden.
I must say that I admire the writing and the photography in this article. Great work. I had a great admiration for these cars when they were out and seen in some numbers on the streets about town. I didn’t know their design went back to post World War II, but I remember them from the early 1960s I suppose. They were not handsome cars, but they were not unattractive, they were well proportioned, very sturdy looking and appeared to be quite efficient in getting themselves around town. Slowly but surely they disappeared one by one due to corrosion in my part of the world, barely missed I suppose, likely replaced by more up to date Volvos.
I mark this one as You Learn Something New Every Day. I learned what these were called, how versatile they were, and that they helped to introduce the brand outside of Sweden.
Amendment – Must be the Great CC Effect – I was watching a bit of the Kevin Costner movie Bull Durham tonight – and of course what shows up but Susan Sarandon driving what else but a Volvo Duett. I had forgotten all about that single scene in the movie, and I wouldn’t have known what to call the car other than a Volvo, but now I know.
Here is a nicely restored one seen at a CCC in Perth,West Oz
I feel like I’ve seen enough of these, even (maybe especially) 50+ years ago, that they must have been officially imported to the US. Despite knowing a few bits of Volvo trivia from growing up with a 544 and then an Amazon wagon, and owning an Amazon myself, I can’t remember if they were sold in dealers here. They are very appealing.
As far as I know they were officially imported, but they were extremely rare here. Plenty of 444/544s, but a Duett finding. Maybe it was capacity constrained, or it just looked too much like a small Suburban and not a regular wagon?
Hi, to all using this thread!
This is a shot in the dark, over 3 yrs (and a pandemic) after 2020 posts, but I’m in the market for a Duett.
I can do some interior work, simple tuneus & deep cleaning but would need a New England Volvo mechanic to do the real work.
Do you have any leads I could pursue?
Thanks for this great post discussion (for a decade!) and perhaps I’ll hear back from you.
Paul W.
By the way, thanks for re-posting this. I found the link to the EPA conversions which took me down some interesting Internet paths to interesting Swedish stuff. I think with only two domestic auto manufacturers, the Swedes were pretty creative, whether homemade rigs or maintaining and/or modifying older Detroit iron.
Three cheers to Ingvar! This is the first time that I have read this article. Note that Volvo wagons and Volvos in general in the later 1960’s and on in The U.S. were expensive cars compared to American models. They developed a cult of people who liked the quality and could afford the price. A 1969 164 Sedan, for example, had a list price of $5.000.00 and hardly sold for less than list. Big excitement came when they offered power windows – front doors only. However, Volvos are on the road that are more than twenty years old.
At last I have actually seen a Duett a couple of years back. I live in an intensely touristy part of Ireland, and I was driving in a long line of summer traffic with no chance of overtaking, wondering for mile after mile what the old wagon nine or ten cars ahead might be. Finally traffic slowed at the Killarney roundabout and I was able to see the PV front wings, and thanks to this article I knew it was a Duett.