(first posted 8/22/2012) There are two very good reasons why we’re having the third Kadett CC, when other cars have had none. First: this isn’t just any Kadett, but a Rallye 1900. And believe it or not, the Rallye 1900 was a very significant car historically; in fact I would call something of a revolutionary, for turning the European automotive establishment on its head. Second: I admit to having had an obsession with finding a Kadett in Eugene. The first Kadett CC was found in Austria, the second in the Midwest. But I never gave up hope, and suddenly this appeared in my neighborhood. The fact that it was a Rallye 1900 sealed the deal: its story of how it upset the automotive order of things (thanks quite likely to Bob Lutz) must be told.
A very brief recap: the Kadet was GM’s highly pragmatic small Opel, designed to do battle against the dominant VW Beetle. Our first Kadett chapter was titled “It Dethroned The VW”; which it certainly did in Europe. And in the US, sold by Buick dealers, it became the second best selling import. Not bad, for a tinny shit box, and I use that expression both as a pejorative and a compliment. The Kadett was one of those brutally honest and straight-forward cars, which generated the extremes of opinions, and never seemed to mind. A delicate flower it was not.
Enough of the basic Kadett’s impact on the economy car market, both in Europe and the US. Let’s talk about the performance car market, and for just now, we’re talking about Europe only. Before the Kadett Rallye changed the game, there was a very highly structured and conservative pecking order then. You want serious performance? Be ready to pay the big bucks. Economy cars were for the working folks, and performance cars were for the decidedly affluent. With very little exception, there was a performance “wall”. Don’t ask what cars like the Lancia Fulvia cost new. Even the new 96hp 1600-02 “small” BMW was totally out of reach for the typical working Johannes.
The mass-market European brands had not discovered or embraced performance, at least not in the more obvious way. Small cars had very small engines; there were almost no upgrade choices then. Cars in the Kadett’s class had little fours in the 900cc to 1200cc range typically, with maybe 40 to 50 hp. You want more? You had to step up to larger and significantly more expensive cars, like the Opel Rekord; which were of course also heavier, negating the larger engine’s power somewhat. It was a hierarchy, and it had a good reason: it protected the outsized prices that the larger cars commanded.
Sound familiar? The same system was largely in place in the US too, going back some years earlier. In the early fifties, Chevy wouldn’t have dreamed of offering an engine as big as an Olds or Buick V8, never mind one more powerful. By 1958, that taboo was broken. But GM still had a rule about no compacts/intermediates with engines larger than 330 cubic inches. You like big motors? Buy a Bonneville, with its outsized profit margins. Well, we know what happened. John DeLorean snuck a 389-powered Tempest past the big wigs on the 14th floor in 1964, and the rest is history.
In 1966, Chevrolet dropped the big block 396 into the mid-size Chevelle, creating the SS 396, and an enduring legend.
And two years later, they did the same with the compact Nova. It’s surely no coincidence that the Kadett Rallye 1900 looks like a 7/8 sized Nova or Chevelle SS396; which is what it was. Stick the biggest engine from the Rekord into the little Kadett, and it’s the non-Ferrari GTO/Nova SS 396 of Europe. Its impact was even greater though, because the European hierarchy was more rigid at the time; America was more innovative, and the idea of a compact with a big V8 wasn’t exactly earth-shattering. The 1957 Rambler Rebel already had a 255 hp 327 under the hood. It was just a matter of time.
And who do we have to thank for the Rallye 1900? I can’t find any hard evidence of it, but it’s got the fingerprints of Bob Lutz all over it; or under it, as the case may be. If he could flip a Kadett on its head, he could also teach it to flip the European market on its head. Bob was an executive at Opel between 1963 and 1971, and his specialty was always the big picture, not the nuts and volts.
Now the Rallye 1900 did have a warm-up act, in the form of the 1966 Kadett Rallye. But that buzz-bomb had a highly-strung version of the Kadett’s 1100cc four, sporting two carbs, a nervous rasp, 60 hp, and about as much torque curve as a dentist’s drill. Not exactly a Euro-GTO, but it already began to drill away at the the foundations.
In 1965, Opel introduced a new family of engines, in four (1.5 to 2.4 L) and six-cylinder (2.2 to 3.6 L) configurations. Dubbed the CIH, for Cam In Head, it was actually designed in Detroit at the GM mothership. Why and how the same organization could design this quite capable and rugged powerplant, and then a few years later design the anything-but capable and rugged Vega engine will remain one of the mysteries of life.
The CIH was rather unusual in that although the cam was in the head, it resided alongside the valves, not above them. Lifting the cam/valve cover revealed a very GM-typical affair of individual rockers mounted on studs. But instead being actuated by pushrods, the valve lifters (mechanical at first, later hydraulic) sat between the cam and the rockers. It eliminated the pushrods, but otherwise the head was still much like a typical OHV affair, with intake and exhaust ports on the same side (non-crossflow).
Beginning with the 1968 MY, Kadetts suddenly gained access to these “big block” fours. Strictly speaking, the big fours in 1.5 and 1.7 L versions were only available in Europe in a new high-end Kadett, called the Olympia. But for the US, the Olympia’s new grille was adopted across the board on the Kadett range, and the 80 (gross) hp 1.5 L four became available as a step-up options on all regular Kadetts.
But the Rallye got the biggest of the CIH fours made at the time, 1900cc, 102 (gross) hp and 115 ft. lbs of torque. Sounds unimpressive from today’s perspective, but keep in mind that this mini-Chevelle SS weighed less than 2000 lbs, and cost just $2314. And the Rallye ‘s suspension was fortified too, and even sported standard disc brakes; take that, SS 396.
The Rallye 1900 was greeted enthusiastically on both sides of the pond. Even Car and Driver, which “assassinated” the wagon version of the Kadett, was very enthusiastic about the Rallye 1900, despite considerable similarities. Road and Track called it “a lot of performance for the money”. It handled quite decently, for the times, and offered a combination of qualities otherwise not available elsewhere.
Just as the GTO preceded the Mustang in the USA, so the did the Rallye melt the pavement a bit with its tiny 13″ tires for the next stage of the revolution in Europe: the Ford Capri. Taking its cues from both the American Mustang and the Kadett, the 1969 European Capri came in a dizzying variety of engine choices: everything from the 1.3 L Kent four and the Cologne 1.3 L V4, up to the biggest V6s made by the respective Ford UK and German ops (3.0 and 2.6 L). In just two years, the budget performance revolution was essentially complete. The seventies was a time of growing income levels in Western Europe, and now performance was in reach.
The Rallye 1900 enjoys cult status, although I suspect the cult is a very small one indeed. There are a few souls who have one of these in good shape still, and enjoy its vintage pleasures. Just looking at that seat gives me the willies, though, as it’s almost completely unchanged from the black ones in my father’s 1964 Kadett A.
It’s hard to believe only four years separated his 40 hp austere “green frog” from the 102 hp Rallye.
But the times, cars and hemlines were changing quickly. And the Rallye 1900 was leading the charge, at Opel as well for the small car market. Almost overnight, performance versions of Europe’s small cars appeared; well, except at poor old VW. They eventually had the last laugh with their Golf GTI, a modern reincarnation of the theme pioneered by the Rallye 1900.
I thought I was having one of my rougher 1968 flashbacks when I saw this in a carport on our regular walk to the Y, not more than ten blocks from my house. Heiliger Kadett! And what a battle-worn one it is at that.
But except for a bit-o-rust on the front end of the rocker, it seems reasonably intact. What its future holds is anyone’s guess. Are rocker panels available from J.C. Whitney? Maybe if you could find an old catalog from 1971.
There’s something jaunty and pugnacious about these that just appeals to me. And the tall profile and high beltline look vaguely contemporary. Or is my flashback kicking in again? Or maybe its just the ultra-contrarian 13 inch wheels. I’d like to drive this to a car show with lots of pristine red and black Chevelle SS396s and such, and just see what kind of reaction it would get.Yes, I guess the Rallye’s anti-establishment role resonates with me. Is it imitating big American muscle cars, or mocking them?
Update: this car was bought by a German and was shipped back home just a few weeks after I shot it. Was it the last of its kind in the US?
Related reading:
Vintage R&T Road Test: 1968 Opel Kadett Rallye 1.9 – “Spins A Rear Wheel Almost As Avidly As An American V-8 Getting Off The Line”
Damn! I was just having a look at Ate Up With Motor when I realised the CC Clue was an Opel Kadett. Too late by minutes
One day CC Clue, ONE DAY YOU WILL BE MINE! ( shakes fist)
That car also arrived in Aussie but with Holdens red six installed that did wonders for the power to weight ratio especially in XU1 guise and a race winning legend was born. Must try to find a Torana so the BEST incarnation can be shared
Ironic to compare the Kadette Rallye with the GTO. Knew a guy who had both. The ’68 Rallye wasn’t powerful enough for him so he traded it on a ’69 GTO. After fighting with his wife one night, was drunk and flipped the Goat on an overpass, landed on it’s roof, killing himself in it.
That is quite an upsetting story!
Back in about 1985, a friend of my brother’s had one of these. He was known for his hairy driving style, and his car was known for being genuinely quick. Despite being baby-shit brown, I thought it was a really attractively proportioned car, with a lot of charisma.
He became well known for crashing the car, to the point where someone actually did a count and decided he had hit double figures, including crashing into a bus. The bus crash bent it badly enough that it creased the quarter on the opposite side, but he still fixed it up enough to keep driving it. However, the handling became somewhat erratic after that, and I don’t think it lasted much longer
On a bit off-topic note I spotted a clip featuring an Opel; not a Kadett but it show his bigger brother the Commodore, it’s from the movie “Cold Sweat” with Charles Bronson driving a Commodore
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFOAdKRJU_s
Maybe that Commodore was another Euro-GTO.
My first car was a used, red, 1962 Opel Station Wagon. I had lots of fun with it through High School. My second car was a red/orange 1968 Opel Kadette Rallye I bought new from a Buick Dealer Showroom. I drove it through my Naval service, and it was a reliable car for a young sailor. In 1977 I bought a 1974 Opel Manta, and drove it for years. Each of the cars were much better than the previous one, and all of them were great fun. I found the Opel’s to be reliable, economical, and very practical. I have nothing but good memories of all of them.
Why and how the same organization could design this quite capable and rugged powerplant, and then a few years later design the anything-but capable and rugged Vega engine will remain one of the mysteries of life.
Truer words have never before been posted on CC… 🙂
Forgot about these! I thought my Saturn, and my ’70 Toyota Corona Mark II were the only rigs that came with 1.9L engines, an odd size indeed.
Hundreds of thousands of Escorts and Lynx (Lynxes? Lynx’s?)) were built with 1.9L engines.
I dunno about the title- “Kurbside Klassiker Kadett” has… unfortunate… konnotations.
Kare to klarify that? I’m not quite getting it.
Update: Oh mean as in KKK? I thought maybe you were referring to some Nazi thing. Either way, I’m beyond worrying about such connotations. It is the 21st century.
Exactly!
I am the new owner of this Kadett Rallye from Bend Oregon. Unfortunately the seller painted the areas with surface rust, so I have to sand all the areas double.
Actual the Kadett is on the boat and arrival in Germany is scheduled for march 28th 2013. My plan is to restore the car and I still have all required parts in my storage ….
btw, from whom you got the old pictures of “my” Kadett?
Maybe it’s just me, but the cream colored 2 door sedan would be my choice for cruising in 2012. Seems like it has enough leg room for a 6’3″ guy like myself.
I’m too old for the hip chicks and the sporty car version.
I knew of two of these rotting behind a hunting “resort” up in Custer Michigan outside of the Manistee. The ground probably swallowed them up by now as it was almost 20 years ago since I’ve been there.
Neat cars.
The story I’ve heard is that the Kadett Rallye was inspired by a modified car owned by stylist Tony Lapine during his stint at Opel from 1964 to 1969. Lutz might have been involved in making it a production car; I really don’t know.
While bigger engines weren’t terribly common for small European cars, it’s worth noting that there were a fair number of sporty (or racing homologation) versions of small sedans with upgraded suspensions, multiple carburetors, hotter cams, and the like — the Mini Cooper and NSU TT, to name just two. Opel was particularly conservative even by German standards.
While bigger engines weren’t terribly common for small European cars
That, Aaron, is quite an understatement. Just what small European car did have a substantial larger engine dropped in, as a performance upgrade or option, prior to 1968? But if anyone can find an example, it’ll be you. 🙂 Keep in mind that the Rallye 1900’s engine was almost twice the size of the 1100cc Kadett engine.
Certainly there were higher performance small cars, like the two you cited. But they both had highly tuned versions of the same basic block-sized engines as their lesser versions.
Perhaps I failed to make a key point in my article: that the highly tuned small cars that did exist were often not very suitable for every day driving, or certainly had some limitations in that regards.
The Opel’s 1.9 L engine was in the same state of tune as used in the Rekord, so it had excellent drive-ability thanks to a very healthy torque curve and power curve. Essentially, it gave the same benefits as what Americans liked in their cars: relatively lazy, unstressed large engines in a smaller package, which is typically faster than a car with the same hp rating, but from a small, highly tuned engine.
It’s the same reason the BMW 2002 was much more pleasant to drive, and every bit as quick as the the same-horsepower 1600-02 ti. This really was a rather novel revelation in Europe.
Of course there was a price to pay, in higher taxes and fuel consumption. But many drivers looking for an every-day performance car were willing. Never mind having a car much easier to maintain and repair. Also, a TTS cost a not inconsiderable amount more than a Rallye 1900.
I’ve heard the same thing about the origin of the original 1966 Rallye, but I was specifically speculating on the decision to drop in the 1900cc engine for 1968.
Must admit I never thought the 1900 Kadett had started a trend. I know the “small” 1950s Jaguar saloon wasn’t cheap, but it first appeared with a 2.4 engine and then had options for 3.4 and eventually 3.8 engines. The BMC Mini appeared in 1959 with 848 cc ( reduced from 948 prototypes because BMC thought it would be too powerful) . Soon there were 997, 1071 and 1275 Cooper versions , though these were quite exotic and expensive. Cheap performance cars arrived in the UK with the 1962 Ford Cortina – 1200cc initially but then with 1500cc options, and eventually the 1600 (Lotus) twin cam version. The 1500 Cortina engine easily fitted the 997 Anglia – Ford didn’t try this but everyone else did. By the late 60s GM Vauxhall were in on the act by putting the 2 litre OHC Victor engine in the HB Viva to make the Viva GT – a gift for rich boy-racers.
Fair enough. I meant “bigger” engines in the relative sense — the difference between a 1,275 cc and 948 cc BMC A-series, for example, which wasn’t much in absolute terms, but was a bigger relative bump than going from a 326 to 396 cu. in. engine in the GTO. (I use that comparison deliberately, since the 396 and 326 were also variations of the same block.)
You’re right on the issue with the Pontiac blocks. I guess I was referring more generally to the bigger trend of large engines in compact cars, the extreme being the big block Novas and such. A comparison to the Nova would have been even more apt. The GTO was really just the one that opened the floodgates.
Vauxhall did the same with their version inserting a 2L OHC engine from the Victor/CF Bedford range, GMH in Aussie put in a 3L six in essentially the same car, if anything by other divisions efforts the Opel was under powered.
Fascinating to learn the Old World had the same strict engine class system as the New World once did, when Cadillacs like our CC logomobile raced at Le Mans. And that it lasted longer over there too. As Paul said, gas prices kept horsepower a luxury, but was that the only thing? Social class system too?
This Kadett’s dashboard hula girl is the perfect extra touch.
Meant to include a photo as always…this from the CC.
one major factor was the taxation system based on engine size used in West Germany , Italy and other countries. Small engines were cheaper not only to run but to own . I was born an raised in Sweden and and the Swedes based their vehicle tax on weight. The bare-boned small-engined versions of cars from continental Europe weren’t even avaliable.
Paul,
Thank you for this great essay! What a find and so close to your home. As the second owner of a 73 Opel GT, this was an easy and comfortable read for me. I agree completely with the Chevy Nova/Chevelle SS styling cues, much like having a cousin from the old country coming over to visit the family. The 1.9 was a great little motor and survived in even larger versions such as a 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4, but these motors were never available in our US Opels. Except for a new Weber Carb, the usual water pump changeout and a Crane electronic ignition, I have no problem getting into my mini-Corvette and going anywhere with it, just as long as I check the oil at gas stops as she is a leaker and blowing some oil by……
Your car here would be a great candidate for a restoration before it’s too late. Even so, I wonder how many of our wonder cars of today are going to survive the highways of time much like this 44 year old Rallye has so nobley done? And you are correct in that there is a cult following for these Opels here in the US. One website, OpelGT.Com, is devoted to these little gems and features an enthusiastic bunch.
As much as I love my little GT, I love this car. Yeah, these little cars do get into your blood!
Opel GT headlights…Kathunk!
Thanks; I’m assuming this Rallye will survive to see the light of a better day. I knocked on its owner’s door, but nobody was home. Maybe I’ll catch them another time; I’d like to hear its story.
Wow, one of my favorites from my childhood! Thanks Paul!
Enjoying all your Opel Kurbside Klassikeren, Paul. It’s a company whose products have always interested me and a company which has definitely seen better days and may be about to go under. I’d love to hear more about the Kadett D and Kadett E, as well as Ascona C.
I’m sure you’d never recoup your investment, but just as a labor of love, it’d be great to see that Kadett restored. Same with the Capri, which has become exceedingly rare.
I have the exact same car slowly rusting in the back yard . I haven’t seen another one since the late 1970’s.
haha! That’s my daily driver! Got it from the original owner and I even got the original window sticker.
Cool. Hope you didn’t mind me taking a few shots of it. Now it’s famous!
I had one of these. My girlfriend had a 1968 Beetle. My OPEL was a 1970 Kadett LS. Great little car. But no parts support from the Buick dealer at the time. Mine was a soft lime green. 4 speed, 1.9L engine . I had installed ANSEN slotted aluminum wheels and BFG tires. My next car was a 1974 Pinto Wagon ….married…. family on the way.. Paid $3200 cash. Gas was 32 cents a gallon. Always had a economy car. Right now driving a 1956 VW Singlecab, 1972 Beetle and a 2005 Saturn ION 3 (208,000k right now).
Still driving my 1970 Rallye. Bought it new and drove it for two hundred thousand miles and then set it aside. Began restoration in mid ninties and now completed after a few stop and goes. It’s 1.9 engine powers the cars light frame just fine. Always looking for the overdrive gear that’s not there. The Rallye was the first Opel entry in the 25 year anniversary of Hot August Nights in Reno for year 2011. Driving this car again is like being in a time machine!
Great web site. I have been looking for an Opel Kadette for several years. Just looking for a very basic no option 1969 Kadette B. No options like the one my dad had when I was little. That car was like a mini tank, and ran forever. It eventually rusted out around the front suspension and the four speed started acting up. Reluctantly it was sold but never forgotten. Iremember my dad paid around 1100 dollars complete for it and it was just basic transportation with a growing career and family it was what he could afford. Used to help dad work on it on the rare times it broke down, just usual gas filter, air filter and oil filter changes usually until it finally got some high miles. Then rust from always being a midwestern car and salt on the roads. Great memories. Like I said it would be nice to find something similar to have just to kind of relive some memories. If anyone knows of anything in decent shape and maybe needs a restoration please email. Thank you.
I am the new owner of this Kadett Rallye from Bend Oregon. Unfortunately the seller painted the areas with surface rust, so I have to sand all the areas double.
Actual the Kadett is on the boat and arrival in Germany is scheduled for march 28th 2013. My plan is to restore the car and I still have all required parts in my storage ….
btw, from whom you got the old pictures of “my” Kadett?
FYI:Paul took the photos of the Kadett himself.
Interesting the car is going back to its birth nation. Are they so rare now in Germany?. Can imagine boot loads of Kadets passing boat loads of Jags and MGs going the other way in the Adlantic!.
Some 1968 Opel Rally’s were sold in the US with the 1.5 engines.
I know,I had one,I bought it off a used car lot in Chicago in 1975 for $250.
I worked at Beck Arnley at the time and fixed the bell crank for the throttle,put a new clutch in it and a new stock exhaust system.In early 1976 I traded it towards an orange 1972 Opel GT.
All told I’ve owned SEVEN Opels from a brand new 74 Manta I bought to go SCCA Class B Showroom Stock Sedan racing.The SCCA outlawed the Manta before I got to race it even once as it was cleaning all the other brands clocks,SCCA approved the Opel Anscona (alsp called the 1900) in the Manta’s place.
I had 2 1966 Opel’s,one a wagon,the other a Rally,both with the little teapot 1100’s.Those were real junk motor’s for the US market.I also had a yellow 1969 L model and my first Opel was a 1968 1.9 Rally I bought in California from a friend in 1972.Some previous owner put a Peterbilt shift knob on it and a 102: CB whip antenna on a spring mounted on the deck lid along with am aftermarket exhaust system.That little car was a screamer and tougher than a Jeep.
In 1976 when Buick started selling Isuzu’s marked as Opel’s I was highly disappointed.
When I had my 72 Opel GT I thought quite a bit about finding a totaled Buick Regal with a Turbo 231 V6 and seeing if I could stuff it under the hood.Then lowering it,putting Koni shocks on it along with some wider aluminum wheels and fat Radial T/A’s.
It never came to be because a drunk rear ended us one night and the car was totaled.
Maybe some one else built one,it would be interesting to see one.
BTW,if someone comes across a non Rallye blue “74 Manta with Rallye paint on the hood,I was the original owner..The hood got scratched at the dealer and they repainted it to resemble a Rallye for me at no charge.Before I sold it I put on the 1/2” wider 75 Opel wheels and DR-70X13 Radial T/A’s,removed the resonator in the back and tuned the daylights out of the darn Solex carb.
Hi Opel Gang,(this was an exclusive Club of Bochum, where Opels been buildt and a Class Symbol of the Population of the Ruhr Valley,a Song by some Kraut – Rock – Band of
this Name also exists,of Course in Ruhrpott Accent,we all grew up with Opels,had actually all from 1969 Manta A 1.9 over a few Cadett Rally to Ascona i 400,as Manta B i 400,to the last one buildt in think 88 in black yellow Irmscher Style,i be jeallous about the californian Clime that has preserved so many Opels cause in Reality the Metall of all german Factories,VW to Merc was simpel Kack through buying cheap Commi – Steel,Commodore Coupe of 72,german Bigblock – Sixline remains my Favorite. But today all rotten away,only Septic – Survivor,i got a beatifull Toyota MR 2 MK 2 what lets any offem stand,rustfree 10 Mile old Engine,,Beauty and Class,50 the Gallon,nice red,neon green Weels,and Applications,for Nostalgics,watch german Film Manta Manta,ore and Manta der Film,in german,Ruhrpottaccent even the Pigs drive Manta,have Fun,before the ten Sierra – Leonis i smuggeld into Yank,half the Population in Septico,hi Barrack,Low – Tech – Chemo War,hehe,l8ters Fox…
I have a weird love for foreign 70’s compact rear-drive coupes… which is even more strange as I wasn’t born until ’79. I have loads of old 70’s car mags and that’s the only way I ever get to see these cars. My favorites were the Opel Manta and Capri which are true unicorns in my part of S.C. I found one Manta on a farm once but it was badly rusted. There was a black mid- 70’s Capri in the area that I saw twice. The second time I tried to run it down with no success… they’re just that rare around hear.
However I have come across a few treasures out in the rural areas. I had the notion to stop by a garage to look for a transmission for my Belvedere and he admitted to having a Belvedere parts car in the woods. No transmission but it did have the extremely hard to find ’65 emblems. While walking out of the woods I notice two small cars completely covered in kudzu and weeds. When I went to investigate, I discovered two Austin Marina Coupes! These are the first one’s that I have ever seen in person and they looked to be completely restorable. Apparently a gentleman was keeping them there with the hopes of restoring one. The next time I go back there to get my emblems, I’ll cut away the brush and get some shots of these very rare coupes.
Received my second ’75 1900 in 2000 from Ca…shipped to Ct.= $2000+ 900 shipping (inop./ open carrier).
Was a basket case… FI (’75 only) was ripped out as it was an experimental propane turbo charged drag car. All the propane stuff was gone. I put a Weber 32/36 on the 2.0L “Euro engine” & reinstalled the gasoline tank. Lowered, quick ratio steering, Recaro seats, Stainless Steel exhaust, 5-speed, elec. fan, windshield washer elec. pump, front air dam, 15″ Enkei’s etc, etc.
It handles like a go-cart and is quick enough for my liking!
I’m in a small conundrum. Having lost my home with 3 garage bays & an additional 6 garages built on site… I was forced to sell all my completed restoration projects. An ’82 BMW 320i(e21), ’84/’86 BMW 535i (e28), ’89 BMW 325is Coupe & ’89 BMW 325iC convertible. My last 2 cars are this ’75 Opel Ascona (1900) & my ’72 BMW 2002 which I’ve owned since 1986 (paid $1.00). I’m planning on keeping one of these 2 cars. Replacement parts are much more available for the 2002 (I have a container full of engines & 4 parts car parts), versus the Opel, however, I have to decide which to sell? I’m leaning towards selling the 2002, as the market value is at an all time high right now. I saw one list for $42K & another sell for $71K recently on BAT. The 2002 did have rocker & lower door rust fixed back in ’82, however the Opel is a rust-free California car. The Opel, is so rare, everyone assumes it’s a BMW. My choice is to keep the Opel & sell the 2002. FWIW, the 2002 is not a $42K car, nor a $71K car. It was repainted before I owned it, & the nose appears to be a different hue?
http://bringatrailer.com/listing/1974-bmw-2002-tii-2/
What would you do?
Barely trying, GM gets the Opel to the #2 import car, and then implodes with small cars in North America with the Vega.
It boggles the mind.
Oh yeah, gimme some Opel love. The pictured Rallye seems to be missing its driving lights. Besides the better suspension and brakes the Rallye received a tachometer, oil pressure gauge and an ammeter. A small clock rounded out the trio. The Rallye wheels were different too. I used to maintain a 1.1 ’67 for a friend and I absolutely loved test drives. That car is what made me go for the 1.1 in my sedan.
These are cool cars! I think that they’re paying homage to muscle cars, not mocking them. They had the styling of muscle cars, but in a smaller package, so that definetely influenced the Vega (smaller version of the Camaro) and Mustang II. I think that, unfortunately, any car in smaller proportions just is probably too “cute” for most performance minded buyers (read: men), which is a shame, but I think that there’s more of a psychological thing happening (ie: bigger cars = bigger everything), as well as the basic desire to want to have something that your peers approve of.
We got the Opel GT in Canada. But never the Rallye unless someone went south of the border to bring one back. Its a shame as this us really a good looking car much more stylish I believe than say the Capri.
I just realized the reason GM didn’t bring the Kadette into Canada is because they were dumping the Envoy Epic on our shores!
I like these Opel/Opel in America articles. This sort of material is almost unknown in the UK print automotive media, mostly because they dislike Opel and the market is split into the stawberries and champagne classics or the DIY enthusiasts who care little for nice text and some history. Thanks for writing this.
Thanks from me, also, for the article. My 1st Opel drive was a beater Kadett B (probably 5 years or so old at the time, & 1.1 engine) in Galway, Ireland in 1973, on vacation. When I came home, I found a 1970 Kadett Rallye (1.9S engine) at a Ford dealership (maybe it had been traded for a Pinto!). That was a great car, lots of fun, and loads of interior room, with the tall roofline & roomy trunk, with the gasoline tank inside (that was not a good thing, looking back). Next was a blue, new ’74 Manta. I loved it & the next year, wanted more space, & liked the idea of fuel injection, so I bought a ’75 1900 (Ascona), and drove it for 13 years, almost to 200K miles, and it was still running when I sold it. I miss them all, first the Ascona, then that Kadett, next the carbureted ’74 Manta.
Thanks for the Opel Rallye Kadett article, brings back memories of the two Rallye Kadett’s I owned. One was the 1967,1.1L , with dual Solex carbs, color silver and the other was the 1970, 1.9L, color orange just like the one pictured in the article. Fun cars especially if you rallied them like I did. I sold the 1967 after it took a hit in the drivers side from a little old lady. Bought the 1970 in 1973 for $750 dollars added Cibie driving lamps, skid plate, heavy duty adjustable shock absorbers, rally springs on the rear and added an extra leaf to the transverse leaf spring on the front. My brother and I rallied it for a few years entering local events, Canadian regionals and the 1973 Happiness is Sunrise Money Series Rally. That 70 Rallye Kadett could take a beating. Both cars were easy to work on and parts were always available. Thanks again for the article.
Ich suche Kadett b Teile . Für die 1970 Ausführung speziell die Heckleuchten und Leuchten im Kühlergrill wer kann helfen ?
Paul, you posted an interesting question way back in 2012 (I have summarized your comment here.)
“Bigger engines weren’t terribly common for small European cars
…..one major factor was the taxation system based on engine size used in West Germany , Italy and other countries. Small engines were cheaper not only to run but to own…
Just what small European car did have a substantial larger engine dropped in, as a performance upgrade or option, prior to 1968?
…..Keep in mind that the Rallye 1900’s engine was almost twice the size of the 1100cc Kadett engine. Certainly there were higher performance small cars…..but they had highly tuned versions of the same basic block-sized engines as their lesser versions.
……the highly tuned small cars that did exist were often not very suitable for every day driving, or certainly had some limitations in that regards.
The Opel’s 1.9 L engine was in the same state of tune as used in the Rekord, so it had excellent drive-ability thanks to a very healthy torque curve and power curve. Essentially, it gave the same benefits as what Americans liked in their cars: relatively lazy, unstressed large engines in a smaller package, which is typically faster than a car with the same hp rating, but from a small, highly tuned engine.”
One answer would be the Triumph Vitesse, or Sports Six as it was known in the USA, where, in 1962 the 70hp 1.6 litre straight six from the Vanguard 6 replaced the 948cc four in the Herald. The late versions were made with a 104hp 2 litre, so really did more than double the capacity!
All the benefits you speak of were here – untemperamental, but significantly increased performance along with greatly improved refinement (and lovely sound), aided by the availability of overdrive.
The UK at that time had a flat rate road tax system – not capacity based as in many other countries, perhaps explaining why this could be done.
Well, sort of. In order to create the Vitesse, they had to lengthen the whole front en, including the frame and new front bodywork. That’s not exactly the same as just dropping in a bigger engine and calling it good.
For any automaker, in the era of automated (robotic) body shops today, and for the past 2-3 decades, the Vitesse would be a non-starter. The longer body would have to have been comprehended prior to the start of production, not “after”.
I know it sounds counterintuitive, but this is not 1964 when Ford, or anyone, could quickly ramp up production.
In fact, even among winners, like pick-up trucks, automakers can only make so many regular cabs or crew cabs. Slack is waste. There is not slack.
The original Colorado, a body-on-frame pickup, is a perfect example. The truck offered a 2.8 four and a 3.5 five-cylinder.
These were variants of GM (excellent) “Atlas” in-line 24V 4.2 liter six-cylinder, which powered the Trailblazer.
When consumers complained about not enough power, the 250hp six was too long to fit. GM shoehorned its ubiquitous 5.3 V8.
Hi everyone. My dad used to have in Perú an Opel Kadett Rallye from 1968 i guess. Bought it new as it was his first car! It was a fast and loud car. He put (or installed, sorry not a car guy) an exhaust that was loud! and a metal bumber besides the regular one that make it seemed like it was preparing for a Mad Max movie. Lots of memories with that car. He had to sell it during 90s as it was expensive to keep. We saw it years later but who knows what became of it. By chance came to this page and memories came. Thanks for that.
Is this ‘My” Zeus? (DIY Front plate)
1968 O.R.K. Same weird orange and the black panels. Bought it used in 72’ Had it for about 5 years. Money/Family issues so ended up trading it (for a retired so bell Van hubby used for work) it basically for parts…. To a guy who had a GT that needed a carburetor or something. Zeus lived on!