It seems that every other car you see today is some shade of gray: Either black, gray, silver, or white. How much truth is there to this, and how far back does the trend of achromatization of our cars actually go? Let’s take a look.
Detailed historical automotive production data are notoriously difficult to come by. Luckily, New York is one of the few states that publishes its entire vehicle registration database (11.5 million total records). This data is de-identified, of course (no owner information is included). However, it does include VIN, year, make, model, and critically for my purpose, color. In other words, a perfect data set for analyzing short and long term trends in vehicle colors.
A few words on my methodology before I jump into the results. For starters, this data represents just a single state (New York), and not the entire US. While New York is one of the most populous states and therefore is fairly representative of the country as a whole, there could be regional differences (such as the southern preference for lighter cars due to their better heat-rejecting characteristics) that might get missed in this analysis.
More pressingly, since this data only represents vehicles that are still registered as of 2020, there may be some survivorship bias hidden in the data. The farther back in time we go, the smaller the sample of survivors gets, as well the increased possibility that the car may have since been repainted in a color other than its original color. Prior to 1946, the data gets jumpy as the sample sizes get down to double and even single digits, so I have excluded pre-war models from my analysis.
Next, there is also some degree of wonkiness in how New York records vehicle registration color, mostly because the system dates back decades. They don’t distinguish between gray and silver, for example, but they do recognize red and maroon as two different colors (as well as yellow and gold, the latter color being virtually extinct on modern cars).
Lastly, many cars prior to about 1960 were available in dual- or even tri-tone paint jobs. For vehicles like this, the State of New York records both a primary and a secondary (but no tertiary) color for vehicle registration purposes. For the purposes of my analysis, I have used the primary color when there are multiple colors specified.
With that out of the way, let’s jump in. For starters, it is not your imagination: Vehicles are getting more achromatic and less colorful, and have been for some time, as shown in the chart above. What may surprise you is the extent of this trend, and how long it has been going on. After varying between 25% and 40% for decades, colorful cars started increasing in the late ’60s and early ’70s, with peak color hitting in 1973. In that year, a whopping 80% of all cars were sold in an actual color, not just a shade of black, white, or gray. Since then, however, there has been a steady rise of the grayscale cars, with only a brief pause in the ’80s and ’90s. Since 1996 the take rate of grayscale cars has risen from 39% to 75% for the current year. In other words, almost a complete reversal from 1973.
Let’s take a closer look at your choices in 1973, picking a car that was on sale then and is still sold today: the Lincoln Continental. According to the brochure, in 1973 Lincoln offered 15 standard colors, 9 optional “Moondust” metallic colors, and two extra-cost “Diamond Fire” colors, for a total of 26 shades, only five of which are achromatic (two whites, and one each of gray, black, and silver). You also had your choice of nine different accent stripe colors and seven different vinyl top colors. There were also a whopping eleven(!) different interior colors (a topic for another day), giving a total of 25,740 interior and exterior combinations, meaning that any given color combination may be one of only a handful produced. When you factor in all the other option combinations, it is quite possible that Lincoln produced no two identical cars in 1973.
Now compare the 2020 Lincoln Continental, which is available in only 10 colors, a full 50% of which are shades of black, silver, white, or gray. It is also available in only three interior colors (A vinyl roof is alas no longer available). With at most 30 possible interior and exterior combinations, it is conceivable that a single dealer could have every possible color combination sitting on their lot at one time.
So what can we blame for this graying trend? As with most things, the answers are subtle, complex, and varied. My Google research surfaced many theories: Increasing income inequality and decreased consumer buying power is cited as one factor, under the theory that the bright cars of the ’50s reflected the post-war economic optimism of the time, while today’s drab cars reflect our drab economic outlook. Another theory points to Apple’s white and gray iDevices as influencing consumer tastes towards monochrome over the past several decades. Perhaps.
My favorite theory: The rise of utilitarian colors roughly tracks with the rise of utilitarian body styles (starting with minivans in the ’80s, followed pickup trucks and SUVs of today). Couple this with the increase in transaction costs relative to the buying power of middle-class consumers (which peaked around 1970), cars are now representing a correspondingly larger size purchase for most people. People are also holding on to their cars much longer as a result of both increased longevity and longer finance terms. This means that owners are more likely to be looking at the same car for six or seven years, instead of the three or four years of decades past. When you add all this up, buyers are going to be more conservative and cautious about their color choices, since a car now represents a much bigger investment (in terms of both dollars and time). This, by the way, is the same thinking that drives people to choose neutral color schemes in home decor.
So which brands sell the most achromatic cars? Anecdotally, Audi frequently comes up, the brand being so associated with the color silver that its rental business is called (only semi-ironically) Silvercar. In reality, Audi is only midpack, with 79% of its cars being a shade of gray. No, the grayest brands are Lexus and Acura, with an astonishing 88% of their cars sold bereft of color. Not surprisingly, the most colorful cars come from brands known for fun cars, like Fiat, Mazda, and Mini. Fiat is by far the most colorful brand, with almost half (45%) of their cars being registered in a non-gray color.
Let me leave you with one final chart before I go, which shows the percentage share of each color over the past 74 years. Black as a percentage of share has remained relatively steady over the decades (hovering between 10 and 20 percent), as has blue. The big winners are white and gray (the latter of which also includes silver). White’s growth across the decades is pretty steady, starting from almost nothing: When was the last time you saw a white pre-1960 car? Gray and silver’s growth was slower until the late ’90s, after which it exploded.
Obviously, the big losers are yellow (which peaked in 1973), gold (1971), orange (1972) along with red and green. You can see tan peaking in the late ’90s, as anyone who was alive at that time can attest to. You can also see the brief resurgence of brown in the early 2010s, which appears to have already run its course.
So what do you think? Why do you think we keep buying more and more grayscale-colored cars? Are colored cars poised to make a comeback, or will the graying of America’s cars continue?
Two points –
We bought a 2017 CPO Mazda CX-5 in 2018 in a very vivid metallic red. Only when I saw the original window sticker after we brought it home, did I learn that this particular color was an extra-cost ($800?) option. While ignorance was bliss for us and I don’t know how much that color factored into the CPO deal, I would have been hard-pressed to justify the cost of that color on a new car, where I would have presumably caught that beforehand.
Also – the 2020 Challenger offers a (relatively) broad palate of colors, including Hot Mango and Hellraison. It’s nice to see Dodge extending the nostalgic magic carpet ride that is the Challenger, to color choices.
Make that “Hellraisin”
My Challenger is boring silver. Color is at the bottom of my priorities, and cheap is at the top.
You could have done very well if you wanted a Challenger T/A 392 a couple of years ago. Silver with black stripes, loaded, it sat and sat at a local dealer, the price kept going down. If you showed any interest, they would hit your email with pleas to come in and talk about it, or call you if you were stupid enough to give them your phone number.. My friend almost bit on it, but he just hated silver and the black stripes and passed. He ended up with Yellow Jacket.
Inside, I want nothing but black/dark gray. No color inside, and no two toned interiors, ever.
I struck my own personal blow against grayscale a few weeks ago.
I think a lot of the “graying” is simply due to the ordering practices of dealers. Last summer, a friend and I went to a dealer about 125 miles away to pick up his wife’s new Ram Rebel pickup. It came from a small dealership, and after we got there, I noticed something strange, the lot was full of gray, white, black, and silver vehicles. There were only two actual colored vehicles on the lot! One was the Ram we were picking up (red and black), and the other was a B5 Blue Charger Scatpack. I asked the salesman about the lack of color, and he said the only reason the Charger was blue was because it was ordered for a customer and the deal fell through. “The bosses rarely order cars in a real color!”. I thought back to the Durango my local dealer had. It was brown and sat on the lot for months and months. They made me a couple of crazy great offers to buy it, but no brown for me. Finally, it ended up being a demo and loaner car. I got it once and didn’t really like it. The pinging 5.9 was my main complaint, other than the color.
Years later, ’17-18 to be exact, I was looking at Challenger Scat Packs, and it seemed like if they were optioned correctly at all the local dealers, they were an awful color like Destroyer Gray, or F8 Green, or just boring white/black/silver. Lower end cars were in a rainbow of shades but higher end ones were rarely any real color. I had to go about 55 miles to Detroit area dealerships to find cars I actually wanted to buy, or over 100 miles away at an Ohio dealership. Finding the car I wanted in the right color was simple,once I got away from the Toledo area.My last 3 cars were (’08 Charger R/T) black, ’10 Challenger R/T (Hemi Orange), and (’18 Challenger Scatpack) TorRed. I’m done with gray/silver forever.I always wanted my vehicles to be a potent color. Any that weren’t were due to getting too good a deal on black or whatever to pass up.
Two basic thoughts: Bring back NON-metallics. Besides red, white and black, non-metallic colors jump/pop/excite. Think BRG or the battleship gray of the TT or the badass colors the Xterra and Crosstrek came/come in. Also, allegedly, yellow adds more to resale than any other color.
Commercial vans are stuck in a whiteout. It’s surprising with the ascention of the Sprinter in affluent communities that the Transit, Nissan van and Ram haven’t more aggressively jumped from the banality of white. I bought a silver Nissan high-roof van for our business and probably paid too much but just to have a non-white van, it was way worth it. Oddly, with 27 vehicles in my past, this one probably gets more compliments than any of the others, save, perhaps the red Volvo 122s I once had.
I found my base 2007 Ford f150 on the dealers lot in this beautiful color.
Though some cars look rather good in plain ol’ white.
A few comments:
I especially like dark maroon on a classic car, such as the Valcour Maroon on a 41 Cadillac. So, my choice when I bought an 08 BMW 3 Series was maroon. Sadly, they do not offer it as a standard color presently. I note that younger folks are not particularly drawn to the color. You see it occasionally on new SUVs, and pickups, surprisingly. I am pretty picky re maroon: keep away from any hint of purple.
It is the non-metallic color that grabs your attention today. Metalics are practically the default choice.
If you are an old car guy: dark colors (black especially) hide panel fits the best (big and uneven gaps), but reveal bad body work.
Light colors (white especially), just the reverse: hides poor body prep and paint, but reveals poor body panel fits. It’s that shadow…
1957 Hudsons (with Nash bodies at that time) could have as many as four colors, if you count the anodized gold trim a color. Whoa…
Subaru has interesting colors that others do not offer: a lightish metallic green, also blue…
To show off chrome, such as on a 50s luxobarge such as a 59 Cadillac Fleetwood or 58 Buick Limited, nothing beats black…
If you are a spy, and want to stay unnoticed, drive a 3 year old Camry, in Hearing Aid Beige.
Currell