(first posted 3/19/2018) On the windshield of this Chevy you can read: 17-7-75, in the Brazilian way to write dates, that means July 17th, 1975.
Yes, on that memorable day in my hometown in Brazil, Curitiba, it snowed. Not a whole lot by North American standards but it was pretty amazing for us. The picture shows that in some Brazilian cities the winter can be cold.
Let’s fast forward to the 1984, that was my first year at Technical High School and somehow I have managed to convince my dad to take me and my buddies to school every morning.
My dad’s daily driver around that time was a 1982 Chevy Chevette station wagon. The Brazilian GM named the car “Marajó”, after a tropical island in our coast. Dad never liked the Chevette and I just don’t remember how he ended up with that ride.
The car was exactly like the one on the picture, a “Plain Jane”, white, equiped with 4 speed tranny and a 1.4 liter engine. But there was one particular detail about the car, it was ethanol fuelled.
The Brazilian ethanol program was born as a viable alternative to petrol during the oil crisis of the 1970s. Ethanol is the alcohol extracted from sugar cane and doesn’t take much to convert a petrol engine to run on ethanol. We have plenty of land for the crops and a perfect weather. So what could go wrong?
The perspectives were pretty good and in 1978, FIAT reveled the first Brazilian car built to run on ethanol, a 147 model.
It took another 2 years to get the program fully operational and in 1980 the “alcoholic cars” started to hit the show room floors. It was an instant success, during those times when the price of oil skyrocketed, ethanol was considerably cheaper and on top of that, the government gave some tax incentives for the buyers.
Another interesting fact is since ethanol is (generally speaking) less flammable than gasoline, in order to an engine run satisfactorily it must receive some important modifications, first a higher compression ratio and since the engine needs a higher flow of fuel, most of ethanol cars had dual barrel carbs and a more aggressive valve cam.
In other words, a alcohol fueled car was a “spiced up ” version of the similar gas fueled one and we all know how important performance is when we are buying a car.
So important that the automakers didn’t even brother to produce gas versions of the sportscar we had during the 80s, for example, the the Escort XR3.
The program successfully delivered what was promised to the costumers and the “ethanol cars” quickly became the standard for the Brazilian automakers.
And the government was ready to push it a little further, in order to “stretch” the national gasoline stocks, something around 15% of ethanol had to be added to gas before it hit the gas stations.
Gasoline was banned from competitions across the country.
There was one little problem with those cars: starting the engine in cold mornings. Since alcohol doesn’t vaporize as readily as gasoline in colder temperatures, it has a harder time burning properly if the engine is stone cold.
Brazil is pretty much a tropical land and on the northern parts of the country, it is summertime year-round. The temperature hardly drops below the 20C and that means my fellow countrymen from those hot territories never had a problem starting their cars but in southern Brazil it is a different story.
In my hometown for example, it is not uncommon on the peak of winter for the temperature to drop below the freezing point overnight and that was a big problem for the first generation of the ethanol-fuelled cars.
The automakers created a simple solution for the cold start: a small plastic tank inside the engine bay should be filled with gasoline, a tiny electric pump attached and a hose connecting to the carb and problem solved. A push bottom on the dash of the car would make the driver able to inject the kind of fuel more willing to burn inside a stone cold engine while trying to get it started.
Well, things were not so easy. In the early 80s, the most advanced electronic device found in a Brazilian car was a “fancy” AM/FM radio-K7 player. Electronic fuel injection was almost a decade away and everything during those cold mornings start had to be done manually.
For those familiar with the concept of internal combustion engines, the task wasn’t too hard: pull the choke all the way, press the gas button just a little, press the clutch to relieve the transmission weight off the starter, turn the key and more often than not the engine would come to life, but be alert, as soon the engine burned the gas inside the carb, it would start burning alcohol and before it stalls, the driver should keep on feeding the engine with gas until the it established a steady idle.
Doesn’t sound too bad right?
Maybe for you “gearheads” because for an average driver with little or no notion of how an engine works, all that ordeal was beyond complicated. The most common mistake was the idea: “the more gas I inject, the better” and a flooded engine usually leads to a dead battery and eventually going to work by bus.
The automakers were constantly developing new ideas to make our life easier during the winter time, after a while the gas button became more or less automatic, you could press it as much as you wanted but the new system would allow only a certain amount of gas inside the carb.
Finally in 1989, VW unveiled our first EFI car, the Gol GTI. Funny fact, the car didn’t have the ethanol version.
The 2.0 engine was topped with a Bosch multi-point EFI, imported from Germany. The system was so complicated that VW decided not to mess things up converting it to alcohol. But the GTI represents the beginning of a new era.
The EFI changed everything, my dad finally replaced the Chevette for a 1990 Chevy Ipanema (Opel Kadett wagon) ethanol fuelled. The car was equipped with a super simple and reliable single-point EFI and fully automated gas injection. He drove the Ipanema (named after a famous beach in Rio de Janeiro) for over 10 years and it never failed to start. The car behaved almost like a “gas car”.
The Downturn.
Ethanol is not cheap to produce and to be interesting to the consumers, its price at the pump can’t be higher than 70% of the price of gasoline.
When the national alcohol program was created we had this notion that oil reserves around the World were on the brink of depletion and its value would only go up. Guess what? We were wrong, by early 90s the gas price was so close to ethanol and the consumers started to go back to gas fuelled cars.
The used car market went crazy. Since gas cars were scarce, their value skyrocketed, the repair shops were super busy converting alcohol cars to run on gas.
But as one could easily predict, the oil price would again go up and again come down and up and down again and again, leaving just one option to the consumers: stick with your choice through good and bad times.
Again, it was up to the automakers to come up with a solution, what about an engine able to burn both fuels? At first this idea seemed to be almost impossible but thanks to the marvels of the modern eletronics the task wasn’t so difficult to accomplish.
The first challenge was to find a way to “tell” the processors what kind of fuel was in the tank before the engine burns it. They created a device capable to measure the electric conductivity of the fuel, since this parameter is very different between gas and alcohol, it should work well.
This device was pretty good to tell if inside the tank there was gasoline or alcohol, but not so precise to determine the mixture of them.
Soon they found out the best way to “read” what is inside the tank is to analyze the fumes after the combustion. For that task, a super sensitive NO2 sensor was created, capable of telling the processors what kind of fuel was being burned. The system would take 4 milliseconds to adjust the engine parameters.
Volkswagen beat the competition being the first automaker to ofer the “Total Flex” engine to the public in 2003. The term “Total Flex”, coined by VW, became the unofficial name for those cars able to run on either fuel and on a mixture of any proportion of them.
Basically, those engines are not so complicated. You will find the trick in two places: first, the compression ratio of 11:1, which is somewhere in between of what a gas engine and a ethanol engine would be and the second trick is the variable timing of the spark.
Once again the industry worked a way out for the benefit of the costumers.
Nowadays, driving a Total Flex car is a worry-free experience, even if you decide to run on 100% ethanol. The little gas tank for cold start is gone and on its place there is a device that warms up the fuel before it hits the combustion chamber. The only button you have to press is the “start” one.
After 38 years of its creation the “Proalcool” can be considered a massive achievement. The costumers embraced it from day one and besides the financial benefits of a cheaper fuel, there will always be the “pride” factor that this program is a Brazilian initiative that actually worked and it is still a good answer to ease our dependence on foreign oil.
This is really interesting; thanks for writing it! I’ve long wondered about the details of the Brasilian alcohol program.
Alcohol motor fuel is more problematic and annoying in North America. By government mandate there is 10% ethanol in most of the gasoline sold in the US and Canada. Cars and trucks made since the early-mid 1990s run fine on it, though with reduced performance and fuel efficiency compared to straight gasoline. Old cars and trucks have running problems (driveability faults), and fuel system parts can be damaged by corrosion. Small engines (lawnmowers, etc) have major problems with it.
The really frustrating part about it is, if I understand correctly, we could do away with most all of the drawbacks—the corrosion issues, the reduced engine output and fuel economy, the storage and transport hassle and expense—without kicking the ethanol lobby off the subsidy that’s allowed them to grow fat and wealthy.
The ethanol we use in gasoline is anhydrous: virtually no water in it, and great trouble and expense is necessary to make it that way and keep it that way during transport and distribution. Turns out hydrous ethanol, with water deliberately present in it, utterly prevents corrosion of a whackload of different fuel system metals. This SAE paper describes experiments wherein 50/50 gasoline/ethanol blends were tested on steel, copper, nickel, zinc (carburetors!), tin, and three types of aluminum. The tests showed that when the water content of the blend was increased from 2000 ppm to 10,000 ppm (1%), corrosion was no longer evident.
And, hydrous ethanol takes less energy and money to produce.
And, the water in hydrous ethanol acts like a water injection system; there’ve been some tests showing better fuel economy with hydrous E20 (20% hydrous ethanol/80% gasoline) than with 100% gasoline.
Looks like the Dutch are marketing an hE15 fuel, and there’s more info here, here, here, and here. So where’s our hE15 pump fuel? This information dates back to the 2005-2008 timeframe. 🙁
hE15: not supported / approved by the automakers, hence a maximum of 10% ethanol since January 2015.
The most common gasoline here is still Euro 95; octane rating RON 95, max. 5% ethanol.
Common other fuels are premium gasoline (higher octane rating, some brands are ethanol-free), diesel and LPG.
Less easily available are LNG/CNG and there are a few hydrogen stations.
Wait a minute…I forgot these. Lots of them throughout the country.
Okeh, now is hE15 not supported/approved by the automakers because it’s not widely available? Or is hE15 not widely available because it’s not supported/approved by the automakers? Or is it both, round and round and round? I was interested enough in that SAE paper to go ahead and buy it, and it looks like hE15 is a whole lot better, less problematic, and more beneficial than anhydrous E10.
hE15 (wet ethanol) is not supported/approved by the automakers yet due to the unknown corrosion effects and “stability problems”. The fuel is called Blue One 95. As said above, the current Blue One 95 contains 10% ethanol max., either dry or wet, and meets the EN-228 regulations.
This according to the website of the ANWB (roadside assistance, among other things). Apart from that, I never saw an hE15 pump here. I learned about it thanks to your comment above.
“Yet unknown corrosion effects” sounds more like an excuse than an explanation, given that there’s data (previously linked rigourous study) demonstrating that hE15 is significantly less corrosive than E10.
Daniel: Thanks for your clarification on ethanol fuel. I’d always been (mis)informed that it was the WATER in ethanol that caused the corrosion!
Ethanol doesn’t make the car hard to start in cold weather because it is harder to light on fire, it makes it harder to start because it won’t vaporize in cold weather.
The flex fuel sensors, at least those used on cars sold in the US do not measure the electrical conductivity of the fuel they measure the capacitance, the ability to store an electrical charge, to accurately measure the percentage of ethanol (or methanol on some of the earliest FFVs). The O2 sensor has no way of knowing what fuel the exhaust came from, they only measure the amount of oxygen content in the exhaust. From that it can only accurately tell you whether the charge was rich or lean, nothing more. Even the modern wide band sensor can’t tell you the type of fuel though it can tell you how rich or lean the charge was. Either way their use is no different in a FFV from other engines as they are used to zero in on the right mixture for the current operating conditions.
The fuel composition sensor is used not only to adjust the A/F ratio to that needed for the particular fuel currently in use but also to calculate the timing based on two look up tables, on for pure gas and the other for E85, (in the US spec Ford and GM vehicles).
Now on modern FFVs they ditched the expensive fuel composition sensor since the Powertrain control module now had to monitor the fuel level for emissions purposes.
So they just sense that a refueling event has occurred because the fuel level is higher at key on vs what it was at the last key off. It then enters fuel learn mode where the standard O2 sensor is used to feed the learned ethanol percentage instead of the short and long term fuel trim. The adaptive timing (on Ford and GM vehicles) also works to determine the ethanol content of the current fuel. Depending on the vehicle this process can take several minutes of running in varied conditions before the PCM will set the fuel learned flag and return to the standard operating mode(s).
Ethanol doesn’t make the car hard to start in cold weather because it is harder to light on fire, it makes it harder to start because it won’t vaporize in cold weather.
Same difference. Both need to vaporize in order to burn.
Very interesting article – I’ve heard that Brazil fell in love with ethanol for some years but I haven’t had the full story. I remember that “gasohol” was a fad in the US in the early 1980s. I tried a few tankfuls in my ’75 Duster 360 on the promise of higher octane, but after a few tanks the car began to run badly – it might have been water in the fuel or the ethanol attacking the fuel system. I went right back to straight gas, the car ran fine again, and I never tried gasohol again. As an interesting aside, there was a notice in my 1984 Honda CRX owner’s manual that using gas with more than 10% ethanol would void the vehicle warranty.
Thanks for this writeup with details of Brazil’s alcohol fuel conversion, I always wondered how it was implemented. My old ’70 C10 had lots of problems when 10% alcohol fuel was introduced, starting with melting the gaskets in the carb and the old airtex electric fuel pump I had installed in the ’70’s. The fuel hoses also broke down from the mixture. A carb overhaul with gaskets designed to resist alcohol, along with new fuel lines also made to tolerate alcohol, along with a small inline rotary fuel pump replacing the old diaphragm type electric pump completed the conversion and all was well after this. Except the removal of lead in gas did cause the exhaust seats to fail and crack 3 exhaust valves, hardened valve seats and new exhaust valves were installed and finally the old 307 V8 was able to tolerate modern gasohol as it used to be called.
The ’86 Jetta has been running fine on the 10% mix, the owners manual does state the fuel injection and engine is designed to be OK on this fuel. I do worry if the 15% mix that seems to be coming at some point is going to cause the old Jetta problems, I should check the owners manual on my ’04 Titan and check if it’s designed to be OK on 15%, I have heard if 15% goes on sale 10% for older cars will still be available, for how long who knows.
The story is appreciated here – a fine indictment of the chaos government can cause when it mandates standards rather than letting the market sort out what is needed by demand.
The technical discussion is also interesting to me though I am not qualified to comment nor to add in that area. I can confirm fuel system issues on some older cars I’ve owned that were designed and built well before the use of ethanol/gasoline blend was contemplated.
The politics of the ethanol is more interesting to me than the technical aspects. A hypothetical free market, conservative Republican who happens to live in Iowa will nevertheless a be very strong supporter of the ethanol lobbies and government subsidies/mandates that result in an ethanol economic powerhouse in that state – one so entrenched in corn production. But a free market conservative in oil producing Texas or North Dakota sees no need for government to favor production of fuel from an important food source.
Fuel types and government mandates also affect aviation – especially GA now. AvGas is becoming less available (Oregon may be prohibiting it soon) and diesel piston aviation engines for GA are being developed because of disappearing AvGas and universal availability of the acceptable jet fuel.
I believe the market, not government, should decide what type of transportation fuel is used – based on demand and not mandate. If this means diesel and gasoline over ethanol in cars, then let’s do it. The USA is a huge producer of cheap petroleum; we don’t need to convert food to fuel any longer to address a “shortage” of the necessary raw resources.
I have understood that ethanol plays havoc on the fuel systems of old cars, at least those that have not had extensive replacement of hoses, gaskets, diaphragms and the like. I have also understood that these fuel system issues have led to many more fires than hobbyists have been used to in previous (pre-ethanol) years.
I was doing some reading recently that goes to your point – that in addition to the obvious factors you have mentioned there have been many unintended consequences such as soaring prices for animal feeds (because so much corn goes into ethanol) and thus soaring meat prices. Other crops have also seen reduced acreage devoted to their growing thus increased prices on some of those crops as well. Anyone who has studied economics understands that when laws are passed to solve one problem, at least one other problem (and likely several more) will take its place.
The problem with aviation gasoline is that 100LL (100 octane, “low lead”) is, in fact very full of lead and has been so for decades. Aviation piston engines are designed for it, so a phase-out without altering or swapping out the engines would result in in-flight failures. 67Conti wrote about the sorts of things that might happen, but obviously the consequences are more severe for flying aircraft. So, the industry has been investigating what to do for years, but has basically been resisting change because it will be very costly for aircraft owners and pilots.
Meanwhile, the fuel suppliers have been maintaining a separate production and distribution infrastructure for leaded gasoline and they won’t do it forever. Back when I was an active pilot, I thought the solution would be diesel, for the reason you stated: universal availability of the acceptable jet fuel. However, I haven’t looked into it recently, so I don’t know where it stands. I feel sad about it because it might be the thing that kills general aviation in this country.
Shell took nine years to come up with an unleaded alternative to 100LL. It is now being tested by the FAA, along with another smaller company formula. This will, hopefully, end the need for leaded gasoline at last.
The history of leaded gas seemingly — well, definitely — serves as a counterexample. It’s a tad utopion to assume the market knows best. A leap of faith, you might say.
Uruguay, and particularly Punta del Este, have always been a choice holiday destination for Brazilians, who are used to driving very long distances in that huge country. As a 10-year-old avid reader of Quatro Rodas, Brazil’s main auto magazine, I had been following “Proálcool” closely without understanding the technical issues. What DID happen, though, was that as we didn’t have ethanol, Brazilians were coming by bus. Or not at all, I guess. 5 years later, in 1980, I went to Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro for our high school graduation trip. While all the kids were rushing around to buy whatever there was, I remember standing by and taking expensive to develop pictures of a brand new Ford Corcel, a model that at the time wasn’t sold here, and highlighting the “ÁLCOOL” above its proud “1.6” engine description.
BTW, ethanol consumption was quite above straight gas (in volume), and you could smell it in big cities….
Thanks for the memories… A lot of “old timers” will say the Ford Corcel was the best “first generation” ethanol car.
Did you also read the other Brazilian auto magazine, Auto Esporte?
Hi Stéphane!. I began to get Auto Esporte much later, as Quatro Rodas was the only one that was brought to Uruguay. All cars in my family were Brazilian, though of course gas powered, so I followed closely what was up. Several Ford Corcel and Chevettes…
A very interesting and informative article. Thank you so much for taking the time to create and post it.
Since this is something that is becoming more common here in North America, it is an educational article and a good one.
Thanks!
And on a personal note, I finally saw a car on CC that had never entered my thought process in any way, shape or form:
A Chevette station wagon.?
As a big Chevette fan, did a double take on that one myself. I like it! 🙂
Being only 1.4L and alcohol fueled, the power output of the engine must’ve been pretty dismal.
Things got a little better in 1983 when Chevy increased the size of that engine to 1.6L.
And latter it received a more agressive cam shaft for the 1.6 “S” version.
Besides the station wagon we had the pickup version as well, called “Chevy 500”.
Perhaps I should write about the Brazilian Chevette.
The Brazilian Chevette was quite varied in terms of body types and models, given that it was built for almost 20 years. I’m sure a good write up about it, adding some versions that were specially built for export, like the Isuzu powered Diesel models (cars were exported as CKD and engines added at assembly in Uruguay), and the Grumett (all mechanical and metal parts were exported as CKD and a company in Uruguay would build fiberglass bodies for a wagon and a coupe models).
Despite its popularity am not sold on Ethanol as a fuel, despite their own risks am fascinated though by Butanol fuel and Methanol fuel as well as the notion of a Methanol economy.
What a great article! Learned a lot, not the least that it’s actually possible to snow in Brazil 🙂
The owner’s manual of my 2017 model Nissan stresses that I will invalidate the warranty if I put anything higher than 10% alcohol in it.
Yesterday, I saw my first E-15 pump in Texas. I hope it is not a harbinger of things to come…
We had a Krogers with a gas station that served E85 until recently. The store closed and I have not seen another station with E85 pumps since.
I would be fascinated with an article on the Chevette, Rubens.
It seems like you guys did a lot more with it there than ever happened in North America.
I grew up at the southernmost region of Brazil, on its hilly country (3000 feet high). There is snowfall every year, nothing like Wisconsin naturally. At the time most cars were 10 to 30 years old and starting on a chilly day was quite a chore. Solution: pick up a kettle of boiling water and pour it over the intake manifold. One should remember that people kept their stoves burning wood day and night, for heating their houses and drinking warm ” mate” tea, a local costume. Thirty years on and alcohol fueled cars refused to start in winter. Old guys like me just recalled the long gone days and problem solved.
Despite whatever I have read since the 1970’s about ethanol in Brazil, your article is perfect. it is succinct with the history from the beginning until the present. Thanks.
I’ve noticed these ads for, and actual radios in some of the Brazilian cars of this era, with AM, FM, *and* 49 meter shortwave bands, at least on this website. How common were 49 meter band radios in cars in Brazil? Very informative article, by the way, loved it!
I was in Sao Paulo last month on vacation. I rented a Chevrolet SPIN because I needed 3 rows.
Every car in the rental lot was flex fuel. I used two tanks of ethanol, it was about 30% cheaper than gas.
I averaged about 28mpg, mostly highway… Very nice.