Such is the competition for a good day out that a preserved steam railway has these days, many organise an additional attraction or event to supplement the working steam locomotive and trains. Often, this will take the format of additional locomotive in steam, open workshops and train driving lessons, and, of course for Curbivores, a classic car show. After all, nothing goes with classic steam like a classic car. Old train people are old car people, as a rule. This 1959 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire was right at home.
So, the Gloucestershire and Warwickshire Steam Rally did just that at the beginning of September – let’s have a quick walk through. An Austin Seven and pre-war Rolls-Royce nicely set the tone.
A multi-marque car show is always a variety event, and often, in perception at least, you’ll find a disproportionate number from a specific marque, type or country. In this case, that was Rootes Group products, so we’ll start there.
First up then, is this 1962 Hillman Husky, part estate car, part sedan delivery van sold as the Commer Cob, with windows. Essentially this was a Hillman Minx with 12 inches cut out of the wheelbase. Think AMC Hornet to Gremlin, with a very practical boxy style and a better name. This was also the basis for the Sunbeam Alpine sportscar.
Hillman did a full estate version of the Minx as well – this is another 1962 car with the same 1592cc engine as the Husky, but the longer wheelbase, five doors and a proper dose of Loewy styling.
Also in the Minx family, officially known as the Audax series, was the Sunbeam Rapier.
This is a 1964 Series IV car, the last generation of Audax car to have the 1.6 litre engine. 91 mph, 17 seconds to 60mph.
Alongside the Minx family, albeit actually 300 miles away in Scotland, Rootes were producing the Hillman Imp and its derivatives. This is a 1967 car, with aftermarket wheels.
The commercial version of the Imp, a van with a higher roof line to give an adequate load bay height over the rear engine, was marketed variously as the Commer Imp and Hillman Imp van. With rear windows and rear seats, it was also known as the Hillman Husky. This is a 1965 Commer Imp, as fitted out for the AA (Automobile Association) recovery fleet, and proud to possess radio communication. To be honest, thinking how a recovery service worked without a cell phone or radio gets complicated and inefficient very quickly.
Prior to the Audax series, this Minx Mark VIII was the last of the immediate post war models. This is a 1954 Mark VIII, with the then new 1390cc OHV engine, which survived in increasing capacities in the Minx and Hunter (Arrow) until 1979.
Away from the Rootes cars, there were some other highlights too.
I was attracted to this pairing of 1967 Austin A35 van, in RAC (Royal Automobile Club) livery and 1964 Morris Minor van. Both came from BMC, both dated back to the late 1940s and they shared an engine, the BMC A series. Still they came from different dealers, so that was OK, wasn’t it?
The A35 was also offered as the Countryman, with rear windows and the extra power of a 948cc engine. Power is relative – 34bhp. This is a 1957 model.
The Morris Minor needs no introduction to CC. This is a 1952 car, with the Morris side valve engine.
The saloon is a 1966 Minor 1100, the convertible, a ringer for one my Dad had, is 1960 1000 version, both with the B series engine.
The Minor, A35 and its smaller engine predecessor the A30 were post war equivalents to the immortal Austin Seven CC saw recently.
This Seven is a 1931 model.
Meanwhile, from Coventry rather than Birmingham, Standard-Triumph’s competitor to the compact Austins was the Standard 8, seen here in 1955 format, with wind up windows. This was the first monocoque Standard, and also the last compact Standard. Its successor was the Triumph Herald.
Its predecessor, in the factory if not exactly in the market place, was the oddly proportioned Triumph Mayflower. This is a 1953 car, so close to the end of Mayflower production, which totalled 35,000 cars in 4 years.
The styling was deliberately intended to look like a miniature Rolls-Royce or Bentley. I’ll let you decide how successful that was.
The last real Triumph saloon (I’m excluding the Honda based Acclaim) was the Dolomite. This an evolution of the 1965 Triumph 1300, adding a longer tail, new front and rear in lieu f front wheel drive. Engines started at 1850cc, rising to 2 litre for the innovative 16 valve Sprint and ultimately down to 1300, also. But for many, the datum was the 1972-80 Dolomite 1850.
This 1979 version shows one of the strong bright colours used to keep the car, and brand, alive in its twilight years. With Michelotti styling and some engineering ingenuity, the original 1300 concept proved surprisingly durable. I’m not sure why, but I have a soft spot for the Dolomite.
The Riley Two-point-Six was a version of perhaps the last real Riley, the 1953 -59 Pathfinder, before BMC’s badge engineering ate up the Riley brand and the large cars were discontinued. The Two-point-Six (and it badged as such) had the BMC C series 6 cylinder engine and leaf spring rear suspension in place of the Riley engine and coil spring rear suspension of the Pathfinder, and styling that looked even more like the related Wolseley 6-99. This is 1958-59 car, the only year of production, and appears to have come from Norway for the event. Velkommen til Storbritannia!
Also originally from Scandinavia, and perhaps taking the same place in the market as the Riley, was this 1973 Volvo 144GL, built just before the big bumper era. Not my favourite car, as you may know, but a nice example and a great colour.
Nice window sticker too.
This is more my thing. A 1952 Jowett Javelin saloon. Tatra87 has given us a masterclass on the Javelin, so there’s no need to cover it in full detail. A flat four engine, aerodynamic body and torsion bar suspension all pointed to a bright future.
Alas, it was not to be; production volume issues and the takeover of body builder Briggs by Ford brought Jowett’s whole adventure to an end.
Another innovative compact car with a flat four – the Alfasud. There are now perhaps just 250 Alfasuds left in the UK; there are fewer than 20 1.5 litre hatchbacks like this 1983 example. But if you wanted a car that showed the Golf Mk1 the way to go, showed up the Austin Allegro for what it was and kept a Citroen GS on its toes, then this was your car.
The enthusiasts’ favourite front wheel drive car of the 1970s? I think so. One day…..
And the enthusiasts’ pick from the 1980s? Maybe the Peugeot 205GTi, seen here in rarer 1.9 litre form.
This was the start of the great Peugeot hot hatch era, and Peugeot have never quite got to the same heights again.
Also a very rare sight indeed was this 1973 Lancia Fulvia Sport 1600. This is a second series car, so a five speed gearbox, alternator and a conventional front hinged, not side hinged bonnet (Lancia are Italian…). The Coupe was styled and built by Zagato, and can be seen as a competitor to a BMW 2002, rather than a Ford Capri.
A hugely individual, capable, accomplished car with complex engineering that puts Lancia’s recent (terminal?) decline into perspective.
And one more from Italy – a 1965 Fiat 850 Coupe. Fiat had a wide range of rear engine cars, other various sizes and generations from the mid 50s to the late 70s, and this was part of it. A very clean example.
One very rare sighting at a British car show is DAF, and DAF 33 pickup even rarer, like, I didn’t realise the pickup was old in the UK. In 1971, it without doubt the smallest, lowest power and smallest engined pickup on the market, and the only with CVT. A nice reminder of my Dad’s lifetime best friend who drove DAFs for many years.
In contrast to the DAF, the only American car at the show was this 1949 Buick Roadmaster with the portholes.
And a side opening bonnet and the Fireball straight 8.
And to prove we were actually at a steam railway, here’s a British engine from 1949 – no 7903 Foremarke Hall, built at the Great Western Railway’s Swindon Works (now a shopping centre) and withdrawn from service in 1964.
The Hall class were a 4-6-0 configuration mixed traffic engine, and would have been seen all over the Great Western and the BR western region. Two generations were built, in various batches from 1925 to 1949.
You can easily tell it’s a British engine – after all it’s named after a country house.
And remember, do not lean out of the window…..
What a great show! I am a Rootes guy and really love almost anything they built, especially the Audax cars. I lost count of the Studebaker design cues on that Sunbeam Rapier.
I also am a fan of the Triumph Dolomite, and have long wondered why we never got that one in the States. From what little I know it was quick and it was definitely good looking. That Mayflower, on the other hand, . . . .
And if you can only have one US car at a show, you could do a lot worse than a straight 8 Roadmaster. I have always loved how Buick gave you not one, but *two* names for its engine. It’s a Fireball! It’s a Dynaflash! It’s two engines in one!
Lots of eye candy there. The tail of the Fulvia Sport is utterly delicious. The Audaxes are always tasty; there used to be a Husky in my neighborhood in Iowa City in the early 60s. And that Riley 2.6 is a new treat for me. We need to take a closer look at it and the Pathfinder. I forgot what fine looking cars these are.
And of course the train. I’ve been on a bit of a train kick lately, in my pre-bedtime Youtube wanderings.
If you do take a closer look at he Gerald Palmer big Wolseleys and Rileys – only a week ago I learned that the Pathfinder (compared to the Wolseley versions and the Riley 2.6) had slightly different styling: flat wheel arches and no sill extensions. Without these the Pathfinder looks even more attractive.
Good pictures by the way! Love to see the Rootes content, often under valued.
Many years ago I found a Pathfinder in a breakers yard, and being a Riley fan I had to sit in the drivers’ seat. This was perhaps the last British car ( other than racing cars) to have the gear lever on the right of the drivers’ seat.
IIRC the Two Point Six did as well.
And the later Isis so I’m told mine was tree shift
Couldn’t agree more about the delicious tail on the Zagato Fulvia, but the front is nearly inedible. To me, one of the worst styling mismatches ever, and considering the prettiness of that tail, one of the most frustrating.
There were, in various phases, 330 Hall class locos – one of the most numerous British types. 7903 is one of the last, post nationalisation, batches, built in 1949, but still clearly derived from the Saint class of 1902. All 330 were named after country houses with Hall in the name – allegedly, someone wanted the last one to be That’s All, ….
Right, I’ll take the Alfasud, the 205 1.9 GTI and the rare DAF bird with its Variomatic “garter drive”. The 33 panel van was all over the place in my childhood years, but I only saw the pickup in the museum and at shows in the more recent past. I can’t remember ever seeing one on the road in its days.
Whenever I come across a show or gathering heavy on old British iron I come away thankful for not having the disposable income nor storage space to house all of the quirky, rattling, charmingly trouble-prone orphans I would undoubtedly drag home if I could.
That primary feeling of thankfulness then leads me to a feeling of great relief over the collapse of the British Auto Industry, lest I might be sitting next to a ditch somewhere next to my overheating, fluid-belching 2006 Triumph Whatchamacallit. The damned things just call my name. It’s a sickness.
Not sure why the old British cars are being looked upon so negatively. I have been driving all kinds of old British classics in the last 35 years and if you take a bit of care they are very reliable and will not leave you stranded. Currently driving a TR4 (owned for 23 years, a Hillman Imp (20 years), Jag 420 (15 years) and a Jensen Interceptor (20 years). Plus a “modern” (14 year old) Jag X-type Estate. Great cars!
Touche’. I think there’s a tendency (probably mostly in the US) of equating British cars with BMC and the haphazard build quality of that era, coupled with the reputation of Lucas Electrics (which, if compared to the reliability of…say most of the sensors and relays in a ’90’s era Chrysler probably wouldn’t look so bad). I daily drove 12-15 year old MG’s during my reckless youth and in all truth I was never left stranded.
Back in the 60’s we Brits looked with distrust on any car which didn’t have Lucas electrics. In the British climate they worked fine.
The set I have in my carport still works fine, if you want electrical problems 6V VWs were the car to buy
My Lucas TR4 and my 6V Beetle were exactly the same from an electrical standpoint. Replace the wiring harness, ditch the generator and no more problems.
My stock answer when asked about either car is “I know an improvement when I see one, and I’m looking at one right now”
Just like British motorcycles. I owned a ‘69 Triumph Bonneville in original condition for 22 years, and it was just as reliable as any Honda CB750 I ran across at the time. Of course the amount of fettling you had to do to keep it that way was a lot more than the Honda needed, but British unreliability is a misnomer, as long as you understand what you’re getting into.
What a lovely selection of English automobiles! Despite the common misconception that these things like to puke oil constantly, I never had that problem with my 1979 Midget. The “Prince of Darkness” electrics however are a different story. I would very much like to drive a Rover P6 before I die. That in my opinion is among the very best in properly English motoring.
The Riley 2.6 has spanish plates, from the canary islands province… Quite a long way in any case!
Somehow that Armstrong Siddeley in the lead photo looks pretty dated for 1959, but the 1967 A35 RAC van looks like it was stuck in a time warp. Did they really make those for so many years after the Farina A40 was introduced, or could that have been 1957? Well, I shouldn’t question Roger, but I looked it up, and those did continue as vans through 1968! I think that’s at least a tie with the Golf Mk 1 convertible’s life extension after the 3 and 4 door Golfs moved on to new designs.
That Star Sapphire was a final very mild facelift of a car dating back to 1952, which basically aped the styling of contemporary Rolls Royces for folk who were rich but not quite rich enough.
You can tell the A35 van is a later one because the doors are plain, the same as used on the saloon. As you can see from the earlier Countryman, they used to have extra panel pressings in them. Quite why the van and Countryman needed different pattern doors in the first place, I don’t know!
Maybe the plan was for the Countryman to be woodgrain-painted to visually match its archrival Minor Traveller?
That does indeed seem to be the case
http://www.carrosyclasicos.com/imagenes/historia/austin_a30/austin_24.jpg
but it doesn’t seem to have been done for very long.
There’s something about the styling of that Armstrong-Siddeley that always makes me think of coming home. Really strange, since they’ve never factored in my automotive landscape, apart from Dad always wishing he could have bought one. Everything about them just seems right.
I feel like vans don’t count in a “competition” with the Golf convertible. There are so many things vans and pickups which outlasted their sedan/wagon counterparts.
My personal favourite was the Bedford HA, the van version of the original Vauxhall Viva. They made them until about 1983, so the British Telecom chappie might turn up at your house in 1986 in a 1963 car, essentially.
I think Morris Minor vans died out in 1971, and of course were based on an even older design than the A35.
We actually rode the GWRR in 1993 but no car show at the time. It’s a great selection and the big and little combo of Austin 7 and Rolls Royce is great. Do you and pictures or info about the Dormobile camper next to the Morris Minor, it looks like a Ford Escort or Vauxhall Viva van conversion
Mk1 Escort.
It is interesting to see some British cars that common folk drove. I went to the British Invasion show in Stowe VT a couple weeks ago. Almost everything there was either a sports car, a luxury car, or a Land Rover.
My theory that a TR6 looks good in every color of the rainbow was confirmed.
There was also an Jaguar i-Pace on display. I think these will be a big hit and grab a chunk of the Tesla market.
Thank you for these lovelies, Roger. The Hillmans, the big Riley, the Sapphire, the Jowett – love them all.
Well, except that black Triumph. That should win some sort of award for being the ugliest British car of the period.
I kind of knew the Austin seven was small but sitting next to the prewar Rolls puts it in a whole different perspective.
To put in where I can get an idea sizewise where would if fit (no pun intended) between say a first generation Beetle and a first generation Mini?
Thanks
Smaller than either, although a little bit longer than a classic Mini.
http://www.classiccarportraits.co.uk/oldtimers/Austin7RubyARQ.htm
The Ruby, as next to the Roller, was later model, the earlier open ones were even smaller.
Great post and great pictures. I have a soft spot for the Dolomite too…wish it would have came state-side…
I do love the eclecticism.
A lovely assorted bunch, we used to drive past most of these in our dreary-but-simply-engineered US-style Holdens, as these others overheated, blew up, fritzed electrically, braked erratically, trapped a child in the non-opening boot of the miserable Standard 8, or, in the case of the Riley Two point six, crashed when the gearlever disappeared up it’s driver’s trouser leg.
However, we also sailed on past every abandoned Renault, (later)VW, Fiat or Ferrari, for, in a truth rarely acknowledged, the vaunted Europeans were no better at reliability or oil continence than the much-maligned Brits. Necessities of road size, fuel cost, use-type, war-recovery, some nationalist arrogance and sheer budget limitations meant attempts at different engineering solutions, meant tiny engines, some persistence with the out-of-date, and sometimes penny-pinching of the punishment variety (see the aforementioned Standard boot). And none of the results much suited the places to which the resulting products were exported.
For enthusiasts, the results were often (though not always) interesting cars for which they were prepared to sacrifice some reliability. Or more practically, who knew and cared when to stick the preventative finger in the (oil) dyke to forestall disaster, and it’s their enthusiast descendants who know how to do so today and keep these things functioning still.
Across the time period represented here, say for argument ’50 -’70, you see flat fours, a CVT automatic, a rear-engined all-alloy OHC, 4-wheel disc brakes, and 800cc to 3 litres, just in this selection. American cars? They just got flatter and wider, and went from flat-heads to overhead valves. And from about 3.5 litres to knocking on 7. (True, there was the Corvair: it failed).
I’m not a universal fan of big ’30’s Rollers, but that one next to the Austin Seven has some of the most elegant four-door bodywork I’ve seen on such a vintage.
Nice work, Roger.
I had a 61 Commer Cob in that green but solid colour no two tone on a Cob the rear seat was optional and the rear glass doesnt open it was purely a commercial the Husky was a mini station wagon they had the 1390 engine and the early Audax gearbox with centre floorshift not the remote variety of the Minx, I had one of those wagons too but a 58 in Humber 80 flavour, quite rare here now, the wagon is a 3B 61/62 ours still had the 1494 engine the 1592 didnt appear in Audaxes untill the 3C .
I too like the Dolomite, maybe because it performed well in a Top Gear episode.
Don’t recall ever seeing one though, they didn’t come to Canada either. Must have seen one during my month in the UK in the early 90’s…
The Mayflower is hysterical. Love those cars, would look great parked next to today’s 1959 Mercury CC 🙂
The Mayflower looks like a Rolls the same way Tattoo looks like Mr. Roarke. I also like the Dolomite because of Top Gear. It is one of my favorite episodes which my son and I still quote from today.
“I therefore claimed I’d done it…”