“Who put a Suzuki badge on a… wait… what is that truck?” OK, I admit that I’d completely forgotten that Suzuki once sold a pickup in the US, but that’s easy to forget, since Suzuki built under 8,000 of them over four years. While American Suzuki Motor Corporation may be best remembered for rebadged Daewoos or the capable but unloved subcompact SX4, the oddest story of Suzuki’s US experience may be this vehicle: a rebadged Nissan Frontier sold from 2009 to 2012.
Suzuki began selling cars in the US in 1986 with the Samurai mini-SUV, eventually branching out into less distinctive, but more mainstream vehicles. However, the company’s US operation was plagued with difficulties – such as the dwindling demand for subcompact cars (Suzuki’s specialty), and a poor reputation for quality. Faced with a tiny market share that was shrinking further and a product line that lacked excitement, Suzuki tried added another ingredient to perk up US sales… a pickup. For this, Suzuki didn’t look to what would seem its most logical partner, GM (which then owned 20% of Suzuki)… but rather to Nissan.
The resulting Suzuki Equator wound up being a lightly disguised Nissan Frontier – which was fine with Suzuki because they needed two things in showrooms quickly: A pickup, and a vehicle with good reliability ratings. With a Frontier, they’d get both. Incidentally, Nissan and Suzuki did not have a financial stake in each other’s company – the Equator is an odd example of badge engineering between companies that are not closely affiliated with each other.
Equators were built alongside Frontiers at Nissan’s Smyrna, Tennessee factory and debuted as 2009 models. Suzuki’s North American marketing budget was rather small, so to get the most bang for its buck, the company decided to market the Equator heavily to its existing motorcycle and ATV customers. This strategy made some sense, as during the late aughts, Suzuki sold ten times more bikes and off-road vehicles in the US than cars. Plus, Suzuki’s brand was more respected by that cohort of customers than by the general public (Suzuki ranked 32nd of 36 nameplates in JD Power’s 2008 Initial Quality Rankings).
As American Suzuki Motor’s Vice President of Marketing said at the Equator’s introduction:
In the United States, Suzuki is best known for motorcycles, and there is a powerful connection between motorcycle owners and the truck market. These people are 50% more likely to have a truck, and in many cases, their lifestyle demands a truck.
Hence, the Suzuki pickup was born.
I first noticed this Equator head-on, and from that angle, Suzuki’s revised front end looked different enough from the Frontier that I was perplexed. Equator has a prominent grille, a redesigned hood with a subtle power bulge, a different front bumper, and roundish headlights. It’s an effective redesign of the Frontier’s front clip, and it’s surprising that Nissan itself didn’t come up with a design like this sometime in the Frontier’s long life. But this is about where the differences end – from the windshield back, an Equator is 99% Frontier.
Here we see a more familiar profile – the Frontier was already four years old when the Equator debuted, and every customer knew exactly what this was. Like Frontiers, Equators were available in extended or crew cabs in a variety of trim levels. Power came from Nissan engines – a 2.5-liter four standard on the lower-trim extended cabs, and the 261-hp 4-liter V-6 for upper trims, and for all extended cabs.
This example is a top-line RMZ-4 – if the nomenclature sounds familiar, it may be because Suzuki evoked the name of its RM-Z series of off-road motorcycles. Equivalent to the Frontier PRO-4X, this top-line Suzuki offered Bilstein shocks, beefy 16” tires (though our featured truck has aftermarket 17-inchers), skid plates, an electronic locking rear differential, and a few added interior features and exterior embellishments.
For sharp-eyed carspotters, the Equator’s tailgate reveals a subtle difference from the Frontier – a differently-shaped plastic handle surround… it’s smaller than the extended trapezoid found on Frontiers, and can be an effective way to spot an Equator from the rear. Ordinarily, tailgate handles are worth mentioning, but this is, in fact, the Equator’s most noticeable modification in the rear three-quarters of its body.
In the cab, the story was much the same – aside from the steering wheel hub, this was identical to a Frontier. Even the optional Rockford Fosgate sound system and the GPS touchscreen were shared with Frontiers.
Inside the bed, upper-level Equators like this RMZ-4 did feature a noteworthy accessory… a series of channels and movable cleats for the purpose of securing motorbikes.
Oddly enough, the most compelling reasons to choose a Suzuki over its near-twin Nissan had nothing to do with the truck itself, but rather with finances. The Equator listed for less than a Frontier… from a few hundred to over $1,000 for fully-equipped models. Plus, Suzuki provided customers with what it called “America’s #1 Warranty,” which included a fully-transferable, no-deductible 100,000-mi./7-year powertrain coverage – more generous than Nissan’s warranty, though that was of little consolation after Suzuki exited the US market.
Suzuki never expected this truck to overtake F-150s in popularity – in fact, prior to launch the company merely said they expected to sell “up to a few thousand” per year. That they did. Over four years, Suzuki averaged about 2,000 US Equator sales per year. Between 2009 and 2012, about 8,200 Equators were sold in the US – less than 5% of the 179,000 Nissan Frontiers sold over the same period.
During its two-and-a-half decades in the US, Suzuki became somewhat known for rebadging other company’s vehicles, but the Equator was Suzuki’s last frontier in this regard. When American Suzuki Motor Corp. declared bankruptcy in November 2012, the Equator, like most Suzukis, quietly slipped out of most people’s memories, including mine.
If you’re like me, and feel that it’s nice to be surprised by an obscure re-badge of an otherwise common vehicle, then keep your eyes skinned for what looks like a Nissan Frontier with odd headlights, a big grille, and different tailgate handle. It just may be a long-forgotten Equator.
Photographed in Shenandoah County, Virginia in April 2021.
A co-worker of mine has one in red. These are actually still pretty common in my town as we had a Ford/Suzuki dealer in town up until 2012/2013 – whenever Suzuki pulled out of the NA market…
Ford discontinues the Ranger so sell these instead, that must have worked out good.
I’ve never seen these before, which, given their obscurity, is understandable. I haven’t seen any Suzuki vehicles in a long time apart from occasional Samurais, and even those are getting pretty rare.
Maybe our readers in Japan can comment more specifically, but it looks like Suzuki still does a number of badge vehicles there based on Nissans and Mitsubishis.
That grille is a huge improvement over the donor truck, and I’d happily rock an RMZ-4 edition if I could find one – great color scheme and a tie back to my dirtybiker youth.
“For this, Suzuki didn’t look to what would seem its most logical partner, GM (which then owned 20% of Suzuki)… but rather to Nissan.”
GM was already sharing their small pickup of the time (Colorado/Canyon) with Isuzu (i-Series), although by the time the Equator made it to market, Isuzu had left, so they could have potentially gone that route.
Suzuki and Mercedes rebadged those Nissans but Mercedes stuck their own engine in, Suzuki offers small cars still Ignis, Swift etc in various trim levels they are common here both NZ new and as used imports thoughused imports have a poor safety rating thanx to all the things not required so left out on JDM versions
The Mercedes X-Class (along with the Renault Alaskan) is the later D23 Navara, not this one which is the D40. The engine in the X-Class is either a Renault 2.3 (shared with the Navara) or – in this you are correct – a Mercedes 3.0
Suzuki made some decent vehicles during their time here (Kizashi, Aerio SX, SX-4), though these were not hot-selling segments and it doesn’t look like this rebadged Frontier received the market exposure it needed to generate sales in a fairly popular one. I see Frontiers everywhere, but I’ve seen so few Equators that I had forgotten they existed.
For all of us wondering why manufacturers don’t make X-sports car or Y-manual diesel minipickup, Suzuki is a reminder of why automakers must chase volume in order to survive.
That one slipped by me. I’d totally forgotten this existed. Good catch.
Thank you for an excellent write up on a fascinating example of badge engineering. I don’t think I’ve ever noticed one of these. Suzuki sure ended up with a dog’s breakfast of rebadged daewoos and this curiosity, didn’t it?
I’m also reminded of the contemporary Mitsubishi Raider, which was a rebadged Dodge Dakota. Of course–unlike Nissan and Suzuki–Mitsubishi and Chrysler *were* affiliated, and had been for quite some time.
And Mitsu went through the trouble of making entirely new body panels. Even the door skins are unique from the Dakota’s.
Need to find a Mitsubishi Raider next! Ah, Kryee beat me to it by the time I typed it. Great minds think alike!
Then Isuzu Hombre, I-290, I-350
Any others besides the more common Mazda B-series, etc?
I had totally forgotten about these, and am not even willing to say unequivocally that I knew about them in the first place. What a catch!
I saw a Suzuki somethingorother in traffic a few days ago and remarked to myself it was the first I had noticed in forever. But whatever it was it didn’t surprise me like this one would have.
Neat! Never heard of these before.
Suzuki and Nissan cooperated on many things at the time. Suzuki was providing Nissan with kei cars like the Moco, Roox and Pino back then and still supplies them with kei vans and trucks now. Nissan likewise provided Suzuki with the Landy, a rebadged Serena, and still does so.
Can anyone tell me what lift and wheels those are on the Suzuki equator? I would love to make mine look exactly like that one in the picture.