Many moons ago, I wrote a love letter to the many El Caminos plying the streets of Los Angeles. At the time, my only motivation was to describe a unique aspect of LA culture (that continues today). However, it turns out the article infected me with El Camino fever, and over the next four years I found the idea of owning an American “Ute” more and more appealing. Checking Craigslist postings on a weekly basis, by the spring of 2017 I decided an upcoming move justified a purchase. I pitched the idea to my wife, and she gave her assent (Proof of our solid partnership).
Prior to making the purchase, I drilled a bit deeper into the world of El Caminos. Between 1959 and 1987, Chevy built 5 different generations, but my budget limited me to nice examples from the 4th (1973-1977) or 5th (1978-1987) series. So which gen did I want? Well, five years ago, I had this to say about the 4th gen Elcos:
“These 73-77 models are the opposite of the muscle cars. They have too little power and too much metal. While all El Caminos have similar bed dimensions, this body of this generation was 15 inches longer than the rest, and it carried an additional 600 pounds. Compared to other generations, this truck was a whale. Fortunately, the final generation returned the El Camino to it’s (right sized) roots.”
Clearly, my preference was a fifth gen truck, so I researched my options. GM built this truck for ten model years, using the down sized A-body platform.
They used 4 engine types and seven different displacements. Most trucks came with a Chevy motor- the 90 degree V-6 (200, 229, or 262,) or the small block V-8 (267, 305 or 350). However, some early models offered the Buick 231 V-6 in California, and for two years Chevy offered the 350 cubic inch Olds V-8 diesel.
For transmissions, most El Caminos came with a variation of GMs Turbo-hydramatic. Initially they were 3 speed only, but 4-speed overdrive versions became an option in 1985. From 1978 to 1982, you could get a manual transmission (3-speed in the V-6, a full 4 cogs behind the V-8), but both were very uncommon, and in 1983 Chevy dropped the manuals from the option list.
While I wouldn’t turn down a 350 four speed combination, the engine option that caught my eye first appeared in 1985, when the base V-6 grew to 262 Cubic inches. We all know it better as the 4.3 liter Vortec V-6, and Chevy tossed in TBI style fuel injection to sweeten the pot.
As the only factory injected (gasoline) motor installed in any El Camino, this option offered me excellent reliability, good cold starting performance and improved fuel economy. In addition, early GM TBI systems are dirt simple to tune and service. As an additional inducement, in 1987 several internal improvements moved it very close to the horsepower rating of the 305 V-8 (though torque still trailed a bit). In fact, the 1987 V-6 exceeded the power rating of almost every other engine offered since 1978.
With my preferred engine identified, I reviewed trim levels and interior features. As it turns out, one El Camino was pretty much like another. You could get some fancy paint jobs and chrome trim packages, but all models used the same basic body, and the bones were very similar truck to truck. My decision made, I started to look for any ’85-’87 V-6 with the four speed automatic. I probably would have bought a 3-speed automatic if I found a nice enough truck, but after about three months I found my preferred package in the San Gabriel Valley.
Outside of minor rust spots on the A-pillar and hood, the truck was rust free. The paint and interior fabrics showed thirty years of sun damage, but it drove impeccably, and included the overdrive automatic. I was delighted to pick this truck up for a very reasonable $3,100.
It’s called the El Kylemino, in honor of my cousin Kyle (on the left in the picture), who lost a fight with cancer a few years ago. Kyle was an El Camino kind of guy and a big Chevy fan, so I’m sure he’s smiling down on this truck from heaven.
This article shows the truck at the time of purchase. Someone installed (Oldsmobile) styled steel wheels and an aftermarket muffler with dual tipped exhaust, but the rest of the car was stock.
A base model, the build sheet listed a tilt wheel (score!), a gauge package (but no tach), along with a driver’s remote control mirror and an increased capacity fuel tank. At purchase, most of the gauges displayed incorrect values, but everything else functioned perfectly within GM’s design parameters.
I’ve owned the truck two years now, and it’s looks have changed as compared to these early pics. It’s my go-to rig for junkyard runs, so I have no immediate plans to add a shiny coat of new paint, but I have addressed the rust and sunburned paint. I’ve also added a few custom modifications and upgraded interior features. Next week I’ll give you a closer look at the interior, touch on some basic gauge repairs, and highlight some modifications to improve the cockpit experience, so stay tuned!
Note: In another interesting example of the CC Effect, TWO authors own a brown El Camino, and we’re both sharing our ownership experience here on Curbside Classic. I’ve enjoyed the articles posted by Pioneer Fox, and I hope he enjoys mine, but we are two different authors talking about two distinct vehicles.
To avoid confusion, please note the byline! Thanks, Dave S
This looks like it’ll be a fun project, I’ll be watching yours and Pioneer’s both!
This generation of ElCamino has been becoming more attractive to me over the years (along with all ElCaminos in general) and now turn my head when I see one on the road. Thanks for the great synopsis of what was available engine and trans-wise on this last generation.
Nice ute!
One heads up, in case it hasn’t already been addressed by a PO. In this era, GM was not using alcohol-resistant fuel lines, and of course today’s gasoline almost universally contains alcohol. Especially important on the TBI cars is the short piece of hose running from the fuel filter “sock” to the fuel pump.
I was working on an ’88 S-10 4.3 that had severe running issues when the tank was below half full. I pulled the pump/sender unit and found that short hose to be not much more than a piece of sticky goo. Fuel was bypassing the filter straight into the pump when the tank was full, but when it got below half, the pump was sucking air through the porous hose.
Thanks Evan-
Currently, my tank will only take about 14 gallons, even though the build sheet indicates it’s a 22 gallon tank. This leads me to believe someone replaced the tank or modified the fuel pump and pick up along the way, so the hoses may have been upgraded.
However, the tank spits back during refueling and I want the extended range 22 gallons offers, so when I investigate those issues I’ll change out the interior tank fuel lines.
Nice Elky, Dave! I agree that this is the drivetrain combination to have for this generation, as long as one isn’t out for all-out performance.
The wheels highlight one of my favorite parts about GM cars of this era – how they open themselves up to “parts bin” customization. I always thought it would be neat to swap in a GP/LeMans/Bonneville G dash with full gauges and the Brougham velour bench seat.
“I always thought it would be neat to swap in a GP/LeMans/Bonneville G dash with full gauges”
You can see a couple of Pontiac dash swaps on the inter-webs, but there’s far fewer Pontiac dashes out there, and the ones that arrive in the Pik ‘N Pulls are typically trashed and smashed.
Since the ’87 Chevy gauge pack has all the holes for a complete gauge set, I think I’ll leave things as they are.
Nice rig! 4.3s are one of my favorite engines, have a lot of experience with them in my years as a marine mechanic. I think Evan means the hose between the pump and the rest of sender unit; the filter sock snaps onto the bottom of the pump as I recall. This will be fun to watch.
You could be right. It’s been a while.
I’ll follow this with interest, as I have gone from being somewhat anti-El Camino decades ago (neither car nor truck, how stupid) to really liking 2nd, 3rd and 5th gen versions. Particularly the latter, as they seem suitably modern to be a daily driver, not to mention lower prices (and I don’t like the Colonnade versions). But as a Californian, I was always worried about smog compliance, especially on earlier versions with funky electronic carbs and lots of vacuum hoses. Plus, I always assumed I’d want a V8. But a fuel injected 4.3 especially with a 4 speed THM, seems like a safe bet. Have fun!
http://lefthandutes.com/index.html
Beautiful cars
I think the TBI 4.3L was the best all-around engine for the 5th. gen. El Camino. Looks like you got a good one.
One of my earliest CCs was an 82 El Camino. Just like you, I became a fan by the time I had finished. What is funny is that I have never seen another since that one painted in that redwood metallic paint.
I kind of like the Colonnade Elkys, but like these better. I look forward to reading two approaches to two trucks with two sets of challenges.
I have a 82 Royal Knight Rosewood Matalic. Had it four 22 years.
I did indeed enjoy it! It’ll be neat to see these two trucks as they get built. Lily will be an old school hot hot and the El Kylemino will be more of daily-ish runner. Pretty cool to see two similar cars and radically different build styles for them.
Having owned several 4.3s in Chevies from 1985-97, it’s a sweet a V6 and the early ones come without any cautions about fuel spiders or intake gaskets.
HOWEVER…if the TH700-R4 trans gives you any trouble, either get one from an ’87 or newer or have yours rebuilt to ’87 and-up standards. I had this done in my ’85 Astro back in the 90s. Early TH200s and TH700s gave a lot of headaches but both were improved to become as bulletproof as an old TH350. I don’t remember when the 200 get good…I wanna say ’85-’86. But for the Turbo 700 it was definitely ’87.
Hope you get many years of enjoyment out of your Elco!
“HOWEVER…if the TH700-R4 trans gives you any trouble,”
The V-6 uses the TH200-4R, so let’s hope your memory is correct and the updates were applied in ’85. The previous owner did install a secondary trans cooler, which is good news given the ambient temps in the San Gabriel Valley.
My brother’s first brand new car was a ’78 with the Royal Knight package. He ordered it with the 3-speed manual trans (because he preferred a stick), and power windows because he had a motor route for the local newspaper.
I’m not sure what happened to it; I think he only kept it for a couple of years.
If it was a three speed it had the 95 Horsepower 200 CID V-6, which could explain why it quickly went away…
My Dad was an final A body wagon fan and had two of them at the same time. I was working at GM when these were being built. I like them more now! The last generation is a case of it being just the right size. Unless you need a full size pick up these can fill a lot of people’s needs plus they can pull a trailer. Also they are easier to park. Good luck with your projects.
Saw the 81 at the Chevy store new.wanted it but had 3 crumsnachers then.found one in south Georgia 2000.put in my trailer and brought it home.my wife calls it “my mistress “replaced the 267 with a 300 hp 350,and a 700r4.now it’s my weekend toy.Had a new 1965 but sold it when I went on a trip to Southeast Asia.
Nice truck, have you ever considered some custom work? Since the A body and 80s G body hve common hard points you can swap front sheet metal and trim to build a Monte Carlo, Cutlass Supreme, LeMans or even Buick Grand National truck if you are so inclined.
“have you ever considered some custom work?”
Since my purchase, I’ve made a number of changes, including some parts swaps using other GM vehicle parts (and one Jeep part…). Moving forward, we’ll cover all the mods. D/S