The British Motor Museum at Gaydon can trace its own history to the collections held by the various branches of British Leyland and one consequence of that is the cars in the collection and on display are not exclusively production vehicles. The museum has long had a policy of showing also examples of development and concept vehicles of many types, and inviting you to ponder “what might have been”.
So, let’s do just that, starting with the Jaguar Heritage collection. We’ll go through these doors, at least metaphorically.
Jaguar has had some major issues for a long time – being traditional but adapting and effectively competing with less constrained competitors was one of them. One possible response to this was this 1992 XJ40 estate, or as Jaguar termed it, Shooting Break.
There had been efforts at a Jaguar estate previously, but you do sense the success of the Mercedes-Benz 280TE and BMW 5 series Touring tipped Jaguar into actually building a prototype, rather than just drawing one, even if there was no Jaguar estate until 2004.
Another perennial Jaguar issue was how to replace the E Type (XK-E). The XJ-S may have succeeded it but it didn’t replace it most peoples’ eyes. In the eyes of many, the XJ-S was a very different car and not that elegant with it (though it is somehow carrying its age well now) and through the 1980s there were various attempts to recapture that E Type spirit. This one got further than most, as the XJ42 (and XJ41 Targa version) based on the XJ40 (1987 XJ6 saloon) floorpan.
The XJ41 and 42 story is a long and at times slow and painful one, and the car was clearly more of an XJ-S replacement than an E Type replacement. In the event, this car was adapted by Ian Callum for the Aston Martin DB7 around XJS underpinnings, and the Jaguar XK8 replaced the XJ-S. Closer to the E type, but not quite there.
Hence this car – the 2000 Jaguar F Type concept, intended to evoke the spirt also of the 1948 XK120 and C and D Type cars of the 1950s, and perhaps take on the Porsche Boxster. You can just imagine how the British magazines got themselves all worked up on what was a motor show only non-runner.
But, visually, you can see the logic behind the excitement.
Alongside the F Type is the 2003 Jaguar R-D6 concept, shown at the Frankfurt Motor Show, and was used to promote Jaguar’s new 2.7 litre diesel engine (shared with Ford and Peugeot-Citroen), as well as show some styling ideas from Ian Callum, then fresh in post.
Dare I say, but did this car have more influence than we might immediately think? VW Scirocco, Alfa Romeo Brera and Giulietta? Beyond it is the 2001 R Concept, a take on a luxury four seater in the XJ-C mould.
But perhaps the true style stalemate buster from Jaguar was the 2008 XF, prefaced by the C-XF concept shown at the Detroit Motor Show in January 2007. It may looked shocking for a Jaguar but it was contemporary and showed links to history as well.
The grille came from the XJ6, the ridge on the bonnet from the XJ-S, the headlamps on the production car echoed the traditional four round lamps, and the interior had wood and leather but used in new ways. Jaguar was finding a style to move onto, at last.
Interesting look at some cars that would have been cool to actually see production
The Vanden Plas one…. To me it kinda looks like our favorite Brougham father Lee Iacocca had his padded ways with a pinto.
Could you imagine if Ford had made a four door pinto? And a brougham version?
The shooting break looks lovely. With the six and a manual transmission, that would
be a perfect, expensive, daily driver.
Count me as another fan of the Jag Shooting Break.
Those Jaguar prototypes are stunning, and well photographed. Why were these design cues so pared back in the production versions?
A v8 Triumph … history says that engine was not the best…
Great summary and insights into BL decision making.
I think by then it would have been the rover engine for the lynx
Yes, it was the Rover 3.5L V8 from the TR8, SD1, Range Rover, etc. Pretty solid engine unlike the earlier Stag V8.
If the ECV3 and SD2 were French, we wouldn’t bat an eyelid. Thanks for a great post that brings back memories of my school field trip to the Auto Museum in Beaulieu in 1964. Though oddly I remember less about the cars than about the train trip there, and seeing the Canberra in Southampton harbor. Or harbour. As an American kid going to school in the UK for six months I was not given a break on my spelling.
I first found out about the T4 Rover from a poster in the Isle of Man motorcycle museum back in 1981. Perhaps the most surprising thing was that it was widely shown publically well before the P6 saloon was launched in 1963 even though most of it is identical.
The Lynx was to be powered by the Rover V8 prior to its cancellation.
As for the Metro saloon, there would have been a number of markets in Europe where it could have met success to some degree alongside the Renault 7, VW Derby, Vauxhall Nova / Opel Corsa A and Fiat Duna, etc. especially upon being expanded to a 4-door.
The Road Rover is the proto-CUV
I’d say it’s the proto-SUV. The Land Rover and Jeep were still almost exclusively UV’s, utility vehicles. Unless your sport was hunting.
That TR-7 hatchback concept closely resembles some Opel Mantas and also a touch of Lotus Eclat.
Wow, what a fantastic assortment Roger! I thought I knew my BL history, but there were quite a few there that are new to me. The XJ40 wagon has long been a favourite of mine, but it’s the R-Coupe Concept for me please; what a beautiful design!
Some real beauties there – quite a few I was unfamiliar with – thanks Roger…
Ah yes nice propagana by Jaguar Ive heard the same from a salesman about Jaguars 2.2 Diesel 4 but they are actually Peugeot/Citroen engines including the twin turbo 2,7 shared with Ford and Jaguar Fords V6 diesel is a 3.0 with or without turbo one washed up in Auckland ex Japan the importers were having trouble selling it I spoke with someone who test drove it, we were both viewing a 2.7 twin turbo Citroen C5 at Turners auctions that would not start (flat battery) no amount of jump starting had any effect so I explained to the other gentleman why (as he was dead keen) and how to get it going, I think he bought it and I hope ne beat them up on the asking price it was already thousands below market value and sales staff ignorant of how they work should have got him an absolute steal.
I do feel like I’ve been peeking into someone’s bedroom closet, in a good way.
Lots of things I’ve never seen before. Thanks for taking us there.
That first Jaguar is divine; I would have bought one, in some alternate reality where it had gone into production and I had been able to afford one !
One of the most common misspellings in all of autodom, on the Internet anyway, is the name of this body style, isn’t it—or can someone demonstrate that Wikipedia got this one wrong ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_brake#:~:text=Shooting%20brake%20is%20a%20car,1900s%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom.
ON E bay people often mention that the shitbox they’re selling has “new breaks ” !
Certainly in the 19th Century the words brake and break were used interchangeably. Example with railway brake vans – equivalent of a Caboose.
1860s – Break
https://collections.hampshireculture.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/max_1300x1300/public/objects/DPAAGP88.jpg,qitok=mxMjItVC.pagespeed.ce.JmfUC1kf9P.jpg
1913 – Brake
https://www.mumfordbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Q777ne12X_.jpg