(first posted 8/20/2018) As a lifelong BMW fan, the enthusiast in me finds it somewhat discouraging that BMWs have given up some of their unmatched handling feel for increasing levels of comfort, and that CUVs SAVs now account for a substantial percentage of BMW sales. Yet as a realist, I fully understand that automakers like BMW must adapt to market conditions and consumer preferences in order to survive, thus more comfortable vehicles and more CUVs.
Like anyone or anything important to me, I usually jump to defend BMW in the face of unjust criticism. However, when BMW introduced the X2 earlier this year, I couldn’t find many kind words to say about it, and quite frankly groaned at the addition of another front-wheel drive-based BMW that looks very similar to a number of crossovers out there. But would driving one for four days change my perspective?
My extended experience with the X2 came as a result of having one as a loaner vehicle while the 540 was laid up with a flat tire and bent rim thanks to Massachusetts finest pot holes. On a side note, thankfully I purchased tire and wheel protection insurance, so my total repair bill was only my $50 deductible and not upwards of $1,000 for a 19-inch rim and run-flat tire. To anyone who lives in the northeast and buying a car with large rims and low-profile tires, just get the tire and wheel insurance as you’re playing with fire… but I digress.
The rim was on backorder and wouldn’t be in for about a week, so I was provided with a loaner vehicle, initially in the form of an X5. I actually hadn’t driven the X5 in about 2 years, and all I’ll say is thankfully a new one is coming as the F15 generation is rapidly showing its age.
Working at the dealer has its perks but also drawbacks, and as I would be there during the day, they did ask that I “return” the loaner each morning and pick a new loaner up each evening when leaving, but thankfully I only had to switch cars once over the six-day period. Upon being given my second loaner, like most BMW customers I’ve witnessed being given a loaner that’s a smaller model than their own, I kind of balked at being handed the keys to an X2, jokingly asking if there were any M5s on hand.
But I willingly accepted the X2 I was given, wanting to confirm my service advisor’s claim that I would be pleasantly surprised by how it drives versus an X1. Having driven the three other US-market BMW UK2 platform vehicles (BMW X1, MINI Clubman, and MINI Countryman), I saw some truth in this claim, as they do all in fact have noticeably different feels from behind the wheel.
Indeed I was pleasantly surprised with the X2 in more ways than one, including its handling. Versus the X1 which feels hollow and rather lifeless, the X2, while very similar, has a far more substantial feel. The steering felt better weighted for more feedback (though still lighter than I’d prefer), the ride more balanced thanks to a firmer suspension, and the overall handling superior thanks to a lower center of gravity. Real-world tests from publications such as MotorTrend have actually clocked the X2 in with superior acceleration time, quarter mile time, and average lateral acceleration to its corporate siblings, with even better figure-eight times and lateral acceleration than the VW GTI. Advantage X2.
Powered by the same B48 2.0-liter twin-scroll turbo I4 in most modern BMW/MINI products, the X2 uses the same version found in the John Cooper Works models of the Countryman and Clubman, making 228 horsepower and 258 lb-ft torque. While this is adequate power for most drivers, even in sport mode the X2 doesn’t feel terribly quick, and I could feel and hear it working with all its might when I pushed it. The option of a more powerful engine would be a welcomed addition for the enthusiast.
Inside the X2 is a pleasant place to be. Sharing its dash, center console, and door panels with the X1, the X2 gains a few upgrades such as faux stitching on both the upper and lower dashes, as well as the availability of Magma Red leather for a sporty touch. Mine had the more sobering Oyster color scheme but I was happy as the lighter color actually highlighted the general high quality of surfaces. Critics hoping for a mess of cheapness and cost-cutting will be sorely disappointed, as every surface of contact is rich in sight and touch, covered in either leather, stitched vinyl, or soft-touch plastic.
Layout is typical BMW fashion, with clear analogue gauge cluster, large integrated door pull handles, and protruding center stack angled toward the driver for easy view and reach. In familial fashion, its large infotainment/navigation screen sits atop the dash for a semi-integrated look, and can be controlled either by BMW’s console-mounted rotary knob or touch-screen. Once paired via bluetooth, as in other BMWs with iDrive 6.0 I’ve experienced, my phone and all its compatible apps such as Spotify instantly synced each time I got in the car. Apple CarPlay is available, but trails iDrive 6.0 in feedback and resolution.
Make no mistake that this is an entry-level, front-wheel drive based BMW, as switchgear such as gearshift selector, radio panel, and smaller nav screen, along with low driveshaft tunnel and thus low center console give hint to that. With that in mind, the X2 in no way feels like a downgrade any more than competing brands’ smaller, entry-level models do from larger siblings. Standard features include power tailgate, adaptive cornering LED headlights, 6-color interior ambient lighting, with items such as all-wheel drive, head-up display, heated steering wheel, panoramic moonroof, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control available.
The X2’s seating position was among the most pleasant surprises to me, as I was expecting it to feel like the Countryman, which I’ve never really been able to get quite the “just right” position in. Maybe it was just luck but I quickly found my perfect seating position, still feeling as if I were sitting “in” rather than “on” the car, yet high enough that you don’t feel like you’re on the floor, with no strain on any part of my often sore runners legs. The front sports seats themselves provide excellent support and comfort, with manually extendable thigh cushions and power adjustable side bolsters allowing me to have the “cradled” feel I prefer.
I went in hating this car and wanting to confirm my suspicions, yet the X2 proved a pleasant surprise, and I actually really liked it. Despite my initial reservations, the X2 is an enjoyable, lively, and comfortable daily driver, bestowing the BMW qualities functional interiors, premium amenities, rev-happy engines, doors that close with a solid Teutonic thud, and above all, fun-to-drive nature. Yet for all intents and purposes, this is a BMW that is an entry-level, front-wheel drive-based, subcompact CUV. Does this make it a true BMW?
I’m hard-pressed to reaching the verdict on the one. As a very purist BMW enthusiast, I find it hard to confidently say “yes”, as I couldn’t help but feel the X2 was lacking some essential BMW quality. Yet, said quality, if it even exists, is something I can’t clearly define, so maybe it could be my own pride and unwillingness to accept such a different type of BMW that is getting in the way. What I can confidently say is that the X2 is easily the best subcompact CUV that I’ve had the fortune of personally experiencing, which brings me to the question: Would I ever consider driving one?
My answer would have to be yes, as if you couldn’t tell, I very comfortably warmed up to the X2. While a subcompact CUV is not the type of vehicle that fits my needs and wants at this time, who knows what my life situation will be in a few years. Maybe I’ll take up a new sport or hobby requiring more cargo space, or maybe I’ll get a big dog? Maybe I’ll be in the position of having a mortgage and wanting to lower my car payment by a substantial amount while still having some familiar BMW feel in a car?
So while I don’t see a BMW X2 in my future, I can say that I found it a very competitive and fun-to-drive little CUV, much to my surprise. It definitely occupies a niche segment of the market, bound to trail its more ordinary and less expensive X1 sibling in sales by a substantial amount. That being said, if anyone is intrigued by the X2, it might help to know that BMW’s incentives on it are quite good right now, making it possible to even lease or purchase one for less than a comparably equipped X1. And please, do yourself a favor and get the tire and wheel protection. With rims getting larger and the amount of rubber between the and the road getting thinner, you’re flirting with disaster if you live in pothole-laden Massachusetts.
Why does such a “car” end up on a blog named “Curbside CLASSIC”?
Dont those SUV things get enough media exposure already?
Why do we write about boats and buses? Because Curbside Classic is a big tent. We’ve been doing new car reviews sporadically for years, in case you hadn’t noticed.
I see it all the time, lately.
Can you clarify and/or define “all the time”?
Yes, we had a point/counterpoint on a Jeep Compass last week and a rental car review the week prior. In that same time period we had articles on three Plymouths, a Rambler, an Oldsmobile, and a SSangYong among others.
“All the time” sounds like its all new(er) stuff, all the time. It isn’t.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cc-global/missing-out-the-2019-suzuki-line-up-suzuki-gets-their-mojo-back/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/driving-impressions/cc-rental-review-2018-jeep-compass-limited-fwd-another-point-of-view/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/uncategorized/cc-rental-review-2018-jeep-compass-trail-hawk-did-sergio-save-chrysler/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/cars-of-a-lifetime/coal-2008-honda-element-5000-miles-in-the-pacific-northwest/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-global-2013-toyota-land-cruiser-150-series-prado-the-last-representative-of-the-japanese-workhorses/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/new-car-review/rental-car-review-2017-mercedes-benz-c200-the-best-selling-or-nothing/
If you are not interested in the subject you dont have to read it. Move on.
There’s no point engaging him, Jason and Brendan. He wants to complain about the content he gets to enjoy for free, and he cites 6 articles from the past month when we run 4-5 articles a day, and when he knows we run all kinds of content both automotive-related and not. And that we’ve been running new car reviews and pieces on newer cars for literally several years now.
Moving on…
It’s quite remarkable how BMW has so fleshed out its SUV lineup. Xs 1-6, with a flagship crossover on the way. Ditto Mercedes. One wonders if there are any other crossover niches left to fill. BMW better hope not — they’re out of numbers!
And your point is???
That’s six articles over roughly nine days. On average, there are five article published here daily, so that would be 45 articles. These six you’ve linked equates to 13.3% of what has been published.
Damn, that 13% certainly is “all the time”.
To echo Brendan, we’d love to see an article from you. No doubt your time is limited as odds are you have a full-time job, a family, and other commitments. Oh wait – that describes quite a few contributors who still manage to generate the content you’ve felt compelled to criticize.
Heck, we do planes, trains AND automobiles 🙂 It’s like a movie!
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/rampside-classic/rampside-classic-boeing-737-once-as-common-as-a-taurus/
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/trackside-classic/trackside-classic-1907-baldwin/
I enjoyed reading this, even though my interest in recent Bimmers is minimal.
Brendan, like Jason, William and others, have greatly enriched the CC experience and that’s why I come here daily. I’m interested in their encounters with new as well as classic vehicles and have no issues with the balance.
On top of all that, Paul has an extensive background in home remodeling and renovation, which, like me, has affected when and how to fit in vehicle projects. Now Paul’s working on his camper, I hope to soon be onto my ’57 Chevy Handyman.
My vote: keep doin’ what you’re doing.
When there are articles that don’t interest me, I just move on. There’s still a lot of interesting stuff in the archive I can use my time to read instead.
“I see it all the time, lately”
I see a 1971 Alfa Romeo all the time – it’s in my garage- but others don’t.
I like the ‘big tent’ aspect of Curbside Classics. I have no other place where I could read about buses, locomotives, trucks, and reviews of new cars by people who I know (after years of reading CC) and trust. We get cars (and opinions) from all over the world. Speaking of which, Monzaman, -noting that you see them all the time- would you say that the X2 is more popular in Germany that its competitors in the same class? That would be interesting to know.
I have to say that here in Dallas, Texas I am not seeing very many of the smaller X series. Although this is big CUV territory, I see a lot of 3, 4, and 5 series sedans/coupes but the X series are comparatively rare, and the smaller one even more so. I don’t think I am seeing a lot of 1 and 2 Series cars, but perhaps, they look similar enough to the 3 Series cars that I don’t classify them properly.
I also have to confess that I have a personal interest in this review as my wife is going to need a new car in the next year or so and a CPO lease return on one of these might suit her perfectly.
Loki,
I’m curious which Alfa Romeo 1750 you have since you are in Dallas.
+1 to what Will said.
Monzaman, if you have some sort of an issue with the content here at Curbside Classic, maybe you would like to contribute a new article instead of complaining.
I appreciate the new car reviews. Besides taking advantage of the special expertise and experiences of CC writers (kudos to Brendan for his open and honest approach in this review of his company’s products), they place our “curbside classics” in the context of the long history of automotive development up to the present. Most collectible car magazines I’ve subscribed to over the decades have included articles on future collectibles/classics. And as Jason notes, these reviews constitute only a small fraction of the site’s overall content.
Long time reader here – I personally love how the site has expanded. I find most articles fascinating, and especially like the new or rental vehicle reviews. I’ve also learned a great deal about buses and trains.
Keep on keeping on.
Good! Thanks for the feedback, I personally enjoy writing about cars I drive or get to experience in addition to the ones I happen to see at the side of the road. I can’t just keep buying them all just to see how they drive…sometimes some recent model rentals are going to work their way in there. If someone doesn’t like that they should just bookmark that post without reading it and then come back in twenty years and presto, now it’s a driving impression of a genuine CC.
I agree. I really don’t care for BMWs, but this was well done and I think it’s pretty obvious people enjoyed it. The variety here keeps things interesting. I appreciate the effort you contributors put in.
Because buses, trucks, and SUVs are often seen along curbs. There is nothing in the title “Curbside Classic” that implies “limited to cars”.
Have you considered canceling your subscription?
Gee, typisch Deutsch…always finding little things to complain just for attention.
Yes, I am German and live in Germany: it’s one of few German traits that is an equivalent of unapologically and hefty farting in a room after consuming a large bean dish. It does get irritatingly tiresome because of their mycopic perspectives rather than looking at the larger pictures.
Thankfully, I am deaf so I don’t have to listen to the foolishness that some Germans bloviate endlessly over silly things that have no merit at all.
I always value Brendan’s perspectives because he gets to drive the vehicles that aren’t selected or prepared by the manufacturer’s press departments. He did an excellent column about his mother’s experience with Mercedes-Benz GLK 350, which interested me greatly because of his mum’s perspectives that mirror my mum’s.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/curbside-classics-european/coal-2013-mercedes-benz-glk-350-4matic/
It’s same for other contributors who have ‘daily driver’ experiences that also involve maintenances and issues they face. I’ve learnt so much about how those contributors figured the workarounds for the stubborn mechanical issues.
I always appreciate Johannes Dutch’s contributions because buses and lorries aren’t something I read often in other sites. He has a marvellous way of highlighting lot of technical stuff about them that I never knew before.
Schämst Du Dich nicht, MonzamannGermany? Du schuldest uns die Entschuldigung…
This was an interesting and well written piece, and I enjoy getting an insight into a vehicle I would never normally look twice at. That Brendon managed to engage me and keep me reading about something I would consider possibly one of the least interesting cars around is a testament to the quality of his writing
Nice to hear you warmed to the X2 man. I remember when I first sent you a photo of one I saw at a dealer and you weren’t impressed.
I liked the first-generation X1 but rear-wheel-drive left it with too many packaging compromises. Ditto the first 1-Series hatchback… the rear seats looked like a torture chamber so while it may have driven well, it wasn’t really offering what buyers in the segment probably wanted.
Car & Driver recently did a comparison test between this and the Jaguar E-Pace and Volvo XC40. I have to say the XC40 is much more stylish, while the E-Pace – being RWD-based – is more up my alley dynamically. But I don’t besmirch the X2 and I do like that it’s a sportier, more focussed crossover than the crowd-friendly X1.
At this point, a lot of these crossovers are pretty much just hatchbacks and wagons, lacking much ground clearance and any pretence of off-road ability. And enthusiasts like hatchbacks and wagons so what’s the harm?
The E-Pace is transverse engine FWD based.
Oh, so it is! How embarrassing. I don’t know why I thought it was spun off the XE platform instead of using the Evoque’s platform, which it actually does. Thanks for pointing that out.
One thing I did know about the E-Pace: depending on the specification, it can apparently be heavier than the F-Pace due to the larger car’s use of aluminium:
https://www.caradvice.com.au/615923/e-pace-why-is-jags-newest-suv-such-a-fat-cat/
You used the term “hollow and lifeless” in respect to an X1. Never did I think I’d see the day that any BMW would be referred to as that, especially from someone who regularly defends the brand.
Sometime between the E36 and E46, deliberately sold out their clientele in favor of more sales (er, leases) to show-offs who had no interest in driving whatsoever. And became nothing more than a Lexus without the long-term reliability.
I used to be the guy who would save up like mad to own a used BMW (new was out of my budget). Today, I’d rather have the Lexus. At least it’s an honest car.
First off, I have to commend you for your honesty about the X1 and X5, considering you’re a salesman as well as a brand partisan. Given that the X1 looks a lot like a Pontiac Vibe I wonder for its’ future (the Vibe, along with all other 9th-gen Corolla variants, are to the present day what the ’41-48 Plymouth were to the ’50s, basically the opposite of the image someone leasing a BMW crossover wishes to present…)
Nice write up! while i can’t swing with this BMW, i am a fan and owner. My daily driver is an 2001 330xi. It has been very reliable in the 4 years that i’ve owned it. However due to neglet by the previous owner, i have had to put in quite a bit of dollars into it. But the handling, power, all wheel drive…………have made it hard to even consider getting rid of it. That being said……………..if i were to go for a CUV…..it would be the Cadillac XT4, maybe an XT5. At the end of the day what i would like is a white Escalade short wheelbase Platinum edition and be the king of the road!!
I find myself as kind of the “anti-Brendan” here. I guess age can do that as I am older, a family guy and like vehicles with maximum utility for minimum price. In other words, our differing life stages send us in different automotive directions However, I find that we have some overlap on this one. Before I started reading, I disliked it too – and for similar reasons. But I find this one to be oddly compelling.
BMW has done a nice job on the styling, both in and out. And I tend to like this configuration as a decent compromise between passenger car comfort and utility. I would probably choose something bigger and less expensive for myself, but I like this more than I thought I would. Thanks for sharing it with us.
It’s easier for me to hitch my wagon to JPC’s comment than to compose my own this Monday morning. As the world of CUV’s, or SAV’s, or whatever V’s turns, I’m left generally flat. I have seen a couple of Jaguar models that turned my head, but it’s rare that any Jag doesn’t do that for me. This is a well thought out write-up on a vehicle that I’d never have otherwise given a second glance, which makes the reading time well spent over a cup of coffee. BMW hasn’t done anything to get my blood flowing for many years now, but like JPC above, I’m probably never going to be their customer anyway. To put that into perspective, the only **V’s I’ve found myself researching and watching for recently are the Nissan Rocks and Hyundai Kona, which are of course very different takes on a similar theme as compared to the X2. Even these aren’t exactly vehicles that wow and intrigue me, but they’re vehicles that I can at least passingly think might be viable candidates should I be in the market. I appreciate the write-up regardless of my interest.
Guess I did have an actual comment in me after all. Caffeine must have kicked in.
Mixed feelings about the X2 here. Didn’t drive one but been inside one already. I loved the heck out of that interior, but I can’t bring myself to like the exterior. Those BMW roundels on the sides are out of place in this type of vehicle, and overall it looks like anything but a BMW. It only looks better than the Audi Q2.
The best looking are the GLA (interior is plain though) and the XC40. Volvo hit the ball out of the park with this one. Love it, both outside and inside.
I was specifically going to call out the C-pillar roundels. Reminds me of the light-up three pointed star in the grille of the MB GLA. Just tacky and shouting “look at me! I can afford the entry level version of a Expensive Car!”
Right. But as is frequently lamented here, most of what’s on the road these days looks very similar. Can we really blame the manufacturers and marketers for realizing this and doing the most obviously logical thing to stand out? (Sure, they could try to wow the driving public with standout styling, or a design that represents a new take on the established theme, but that’s too risky these days given the cost of developing a new model.) Sign of the times, sad to say.
Yes, because marketers and manufacturers caused it. The public buys whatever they push through insecurity, fear, utopian promises of “active” lifestyles and utility(because soccer balls and groceries don’t fit in trunks, apparently) in what is, an always has been, a motorized crate on wheels. They painted themselves into this corner, selling, selling, selling, more aerodynamics, more utility, more safety, more technology, to the point that it all exceeds the ability for them to stand out anymore, compounded at the same time they all copy each other to death. They always have, of course, but as packaging and propulsion are now being consolidated into a certain standard (that they inadvertently set for the public), it’s starting to seem like end game for them lately. Killed by a monster of their own creation.
As for the roundels, I don’t mind them, but it does seem they’re there simply to remind people they’re BMWs since they inexplicably forgot the brand signature Hofmeister kink in the design.
You mean Kaiser kink, dating to 1953… nothing to do with Wilhelm 😉
Most of what’s on the road in any given “days” looks very similar if one consciously chooses not see the distinguishing aspects.
That’s not as bad as Chinese Haval SUVs that have a high level brake light that spells out HAVAL when it lights up…
I had heard surprising things about the X2, mostly that it drove far better than anybody expected it would. However, it still gets no pass from me. I love BMW. We’ve owned many of them. They drive exceptionally well, and are meant to compromise in favor of performance and not comfort or sales. This sounds as though it has compromised in favor of the latter. Most of all, and this is going to seem like a strange nitpick, but I cannot abide that C-Pillar badge. It’s too brougham-y to me. BMW was always the anti-brougham in my mind.
Nicely written, and I enjoyed reading the review. To me, one of the big draws of this site is the diversity in vehicles being written about.
As anti-current BMW as I am, I can’t help but point out that the c-pillar BMW badge (aka Roundel) is a throwback to the BMW E9 coupe (2000 CS, 2800 CS, 3.0 CS etc) from the late 60s and early 1970s. As such it predates the brougham era.
Sure enough. I’d never actually noticed it on the E9, and I would never had noticed if you hadn’t pointed it out. However, the E9 was a graceful and well styled coupe, whereas this is a much less well styled crossover. Had this badge appeared on the 4 or 6 series, it might be more acceptable. But crossovers don’t really have what it takes to pull it off. It feels tacked on, like an Autozone hood-scoop. It just doesn’t fit.
National stereo type here but I find myself supporting the underdog and agreeing with Monzaman in that I do not consider new SUV/CUVs to be a classic (but an old Landrover,or Jeep I would), by that I mean a classic is an older vehicle with some historic, aesthetic social or technical interest,
Some current vehicles can qualify as a classic if they are exceptional e.g. Rolls Royce Wraith, but a new SUV is just an ordinary car on the road
The title Curbside Classics does imply that the vehicles are out of the ordinary
Personally I dislike SUV/CUVs in an urban environment to an irrational extent as I loath the aspirational “look at me I am so active” marketing as much as anything else, when in the UK at least they are used to take the kids to school or fetch the shopping, just one step below the equally loathsome Chelsea tractors. In the urban environment in Europe a VW Golf or similar is all the car you actually need.
but I also enjoy the non car related articles very much, would love to see an article about the military jeep M38A1 rather than the civilian version if anyone is thinking about it
There’s a certain “where do you draw the line” matter with SUVs in an urban environment.
This car is a tall(ish) hatchback. Aspriationally and “active-lifestyle” marketed, to be sure, but still a hatchback.
I can see a clear difference between a Golf and this, I am a lost cause, you will never change my mind. I saw an advert that used sleek and SUV in the same sentence, an oxymoron in my book.
I drive low slung fast cornering cars because of the roads I drive on, and these things restrict your view ahead and around and are a safety hazard as they slow excessively for the corners
On a weekly basis for the last 2 years I drive 90 miles to work on a roads that are mile after mile of tight corners with limited passing opportunities, these things drop to a snails pace, I normally corner at 50-60 where they slow to 30-40 and if I am stuck behind one of them it makes my journey excessively long and frustrating
The conditions we are in and the cars we drive can certainly impact our outlooks. When I am in my Miata, I seek out the kinds of roads you describe – and they are mighty few and far between in my part of the world. And like you, when I do get on one of them I grind my teeth when I get behind some lumbering buffoon in a pickup or SUV that is robbing me of my driving experience.
On the other hand, most of the time I am on wide roads that are flat and have few curves and I find that I *am* one of the lumbering buffoons as I cruise in my minivan (or temporary elderly Civic). At least I stay out of the left lane unless I am passing someone. 🙂
Quite agree Mr Cavanaugh,
The roads where I live are very different, the really annoying thing is that our cost of fuel make cars that accelerate well where you can safely pass in a short distance too expensive to run.
Had a memorable trip as a passenger in a TVR Tuscan that would swoop past 3 or 4 cars as if they were standing still on those roads, but you could soon lose your driving license enjoying that power
To vary the route I often cross the River Wye using the Llanstephan bridge, if its clear I take it at 20, my Audi A6 would pass with 10 inches either side of the door mirrors, I was a passenger in a Nissan SUV/CUV and guided the driver without thinking, his face was a picture as he crawled across.
If I lived in the US with wide open roads, rather than spend money on a new vehicle I would have to have a classic 60s car like a Lincoln or imperial , updated with throttle body fuel injection, electronic ignition, discs and 4sp overdrive autobox.
I’m with you Lee!
I saw this coming…when the original Ford Expedition first appeared, I knew it would be hit..and the roads would eventually be filled with vehicles that would block the view…
The GTI is an excellent car—perhaps the best-all around car.
The BMW X2 is a nice crossover. It’s well done. Badged as a VW, it would be good! Badged as BMW, it caters to the American motorist….and as such, is an eloquent rebuttal of what BMW once represented, to paraphrase Mr. David E Davis (who once wrote about the 76 320i it was an ‘eloquent rebuttal’ to Detroit–back when Detroit was big and over 80% of the US market).
I don’t care that it make corner better in some test than the vaunted GTI.
It’s FWD cross-over, for goodness sake.
NOTHING classic about it TODAY. In 40 years though, if we still drive cars, it would be a good CC–just like the mundane, sometimes execrable cars of my youth (for example, AMC Gremlin, Datsun 200SX) are now worthy of this fine website.
That says more about the drivers than the capabilities of modern fwd-SUVs, I dare say they would drive the same way in a normal hatchback or a Morris Minor too.
Thank you for the write up Brendan since I am curious what others think of this vehicle. At first I thought the C-pillar roundel was corny, however it is growing on me due to its quirkiness. the rental company I work for has a few of these and thankfully the run-flat tires are not all that difficult to replace when a customer gets a flat. The factory BMW X3 tires however, are a major pain in the rear end to get off the wheel. I find the air conditioning on the X2 to be somewhat inadequate for this hot Portland Oregon weather despite the blower motor being turned to max and the air temperature as low as it will go. Perhaps I am doing something wrong.
I like these and this was a good review that I can “interpret” towards my own criteria based on what I know of the author’s predelictions as opposed to my own. I’d likely have no issues driving this vehicles, but would have to try it on “for size” myself to see if I would be comfortable in it.
The styling is inoffensive, the interior is very attractive, the twin roundels are perhaps a bit much, hopefully that doesn’t become a new thing across the lineup, And it’s a testament to the engineering that two BMWs and two Minis, all from the same parts bin can apparently feel so different (echoing other reviews besides this one).
At the end of the day, people can bitch and moan about the “purity and essence” of the marque but just as with Porsche, if you want the lights kept on at the factory you need to either A) accept significantly increased prices for the stuff you want and actually buy that stuff new or B) have them produce other stuff to sell that can help subsidize the really good stuff. This is fine with me, nobody is forcing anyone to buy or lease something they don’t want. At least on the new BMWs the fog lights don’t seem to stay on 24/7 as in the good old days so that’s a positive. 🙂
Lastly, many vehicles in this genre are beginning to actually drive surprisingly well. I’d guess that this particular vehicle may well be able to run rings around some of the “enthusiast” BMW’s of days gone by and would likely embarrass a lot of them. Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it I suppose.
“…I couldn’t help but feel the X2 was lacking some essential BMW quality. Yet, said quality, if it even exists, is something I can’t clearly define…”
In my humble opinion, that “mysterious” quality is actually not so obscure. It comes from:
1. A smooth, revvy straight-six
2. Balanced rwd handling
3. A heavy-yet-communicative steering rack
If I gave you those three descriptions and said, “Guess what kind of car I’m talking about!”, you’d almost certainly get it right. Sadly, today it’s hard to find a BMW on dealer lots that has all three traits.
And since I’m feeling curmudgeonly, I’ll also complain about wheel/tire insurance: something has gone terribly wrong if this seems necessary for a car driven on ordinary paved roads. I used to live in Boston, so I’m familiar with the conditions that Brendan describes… and we did indeed buy (and use) the insurance for our modern BMWs. But I had no such issues with my 2001 5-series. It had 16-inch wheels, looked good and handled great. And it perfectly embodied the three BMW traits I mentioned above.
Well presented. BMW has been more consistent that almost any other auto maker retaining styling cues from year to year and across models. The roundel and twin kidney grilles have been there since forever. This of course keeps fooling me that other BMW traditional features have also remained constant like RWD based platforms.
SAV or SAP? And yay, yet another new car with light-truck legal tint I can’t see around or through in traffic…
Nice DLO fail at the end the half assed Hofmeister kink.
Very well done review of a car I know almost nothing about. I don’t tell my contributors what to write, but since I don’t have the time to read other automotive sites (except AN), this is giving me the opportunity to keep up with some new cars I might otherwise be ignorant about.
Ignorance leads to impulse judgments and narrow thinking; it’s easy to dismiss these and so many other new cars out there, and only hang on to your cherished idea of what a BMW really is. But here’s the fact: the owners of BMW have always had only one thing as their laser focus: to maximize the profits and value of the company. If you think it was indulging your interest in enthusiast cars, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
The simple fact is that back in the day, there BMW saw a big hole in the market, and exploited it beautifully. Incomes were rising and a number of drivers who either had been exposed to sports cars in the 50s and early 60s were ready for sedans that had genuine sporting capabilities. Or at least exuded that image. Look at how successful the Corvair Monza was for a few years. BMW took up that direction and ran with it, as the Mustang morphed into something quite different.
The market has changed a huge amount over the decades. Every manufacturer sells cars that can vastly outstrip the driving capabilities of most drivers, and run circles around the classic BMWs of yore. That gap in the market has mostly evaporated. How well is Alfa doing right now? And the V series Cadillacs?
BMW’s 2002 was a breakthrough car, a true game changer. And now the Tesla Model 3 has taken up that mantle. It’s the game changer of today. Period.BMW has gone mainstream in order to maximize its profit, but has become conservative in the process, as all companies tend to do once they have created a profitable corner of the market for themselves.
Game changers inevitably come from companies that are new, like Tesla, or at the edge of bankruptcy, like the New Class BMWs and the Taurus from Ford. Nobody is going to risk a profitable enterprise on a potential game changer.
25 years from now, if Tesla survives, you’ll be saying the same things about them, how boring they’ve become, and how they’re just playing it safe…
“Game changers inevitably come from companies that are new, like Tesla, or at the edge of bankruptcy, like the New Class BMWs and the Taurus from Ford.”
Not sure I agree with that… Prius, “fat” Camry (1992-1996), the early Civic and Accord, the first Lexus LS400…
So, in addition to new or teetering companies, innovation can also come from… Toyota or Honda.
Agreed. Change “inevitably” to “usually”.
having said that:
Honda was still a very young automobile manufacturer when it came out with the Civic and Accord. They were their first mass-product cars.
The “fat” Camry was a logical response to the Voluntary Import Restrictions, which meant that the obvious thing for the Japanese to do was to increase the content and price of their cars, in order to increase total revenue without increasing sales. As soon as that foolish experiment ended, Toyota quickly decontented the Camry.
The Prius was a game changer, and I give Toyota credit for that.
The LS400 was a game changer too. But then the German luxury brands were overdue for a fall in the US with their over-priced over-engineered cars. It was a logical way to compete with them.
It’s like they pulled out off the line too fast and it stretched and deformed like taffy from the B-pillar back. The rear door and huge C-pillar just don’t look right to my eyes.
The rear arrangement is very similar to the current generation Hyundai i30.
Olivertwist
I have a 71 Spider Veloce…
I’ll be at the ‘ItalianCarFest’ with my car in Grapevine in September. Look me and I’Lloyd buy you a beer while we trade Alfa stories.
http://www.italiancarfest.org
Ah, I owned a red 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750A Berlina with automatic gearbox when I lived in Dallas until 1996. Yes, a factory-installed automatic gearbox that predated 2000 and Alfetta.
Thanks for the beer. I would love to come to Dallas for the festival, but I live in Munich now.
Ooh god not another one… Another whatever it is that looks like an orthopedic shoe
Wow such controversy, I have zero interest in BMWs newer efforts some of the older ones were very nice stylish sport sedans that I did like, This write up was interesting in that an industry insider wrote it without trying to sell us one, I couldnt see me in a CUV/SUV at anytime in the future they dont suit the roads I like to travel on and even if they do perform well on a smooth skid pan they seem to scare their buyers into braking hard for any tight bend in the road, our roads are potholed and littered with poor repairs I’m quite glad my recent buy is on 65 aspect tyres they at least can soak up some of the holes without disintegrating and should they fail I’ll be putting black steel rims on in place of the alloys the factory fitted.
This is a timely article for me Brendan, my mother is soon to take delivery of a 320i Shadow Edition, which has 19″ rims.
When she said she had made the purchase a couple of months ago, I advised that she should see if they can swap the 19’s for 17’s to get a bit more sidewall height because she lives in a country area. But it seems that since she’d already signed the contract there wasn’t much interest in helping with this…
As much as I want to dislike this car, I really, really like that gold color it comes in 😉
Coming late to this one……
Personally, I see this car as answering a question that has not been asked, in creating a Coupe with a 4×4 basis and high rise build.
My take, FWIW, is that the BMW 420 Gran Coupe offers all this car does with more BMW-ness, being more low slung and compact, and with a much preferable driving experience for the same sort of money and lot more style. It would be my choice, without a doubt
Love that crumbling industrial setting in pic 5…the cars not so much. Unless you’re leasing a German car… fuggedaboudit. Abhor that pretentious “roundel” on the c pillar, but we must advert our status symbol to the max, oui? I’ll keep our boring but competent and anvil-reliable RAV, it’ll no doubt soldier on stoutly and still be worth something in 10 years. Our S-I-L’s X3 has been a total nightmare.
As to potholes, the 80 series 16s on our xTerra plow through them with impunity. Just don’t get these rubber-band tire/wheel combos nowadays…dumb.
I don’t have a problem with manufacturers making a line of CUVs and SUVs, but unfortunately a lot of them have abandoned building regular automobiles, coupes and sedans. But the buying public wants SUVs and CUVs, they are now the normal vehicle configuration for buyers.
Yesterday I saw a new Porsche 911 on the freeway, quite impressive, but I see a lot more Macans, Cayannes, and Panameras on a daily basis. It’s nice that Porsche can still produce their sports cars. Though they are way above the reach of the typical buyer, I’m glad they still exist.
I think that BMWs were special at one time, and quite distinct from what American companies were producing. I don’t follow the make, but I assume that there are still some RWD sedans and coupes in their line up.
I think that the little CUVs are pretty useful, and the up market models are nice and plush. I actually surprised myself by taking a Lincoln MKC out for a test drive and finding that I liked it. I also like the mix of topics on CC.