The Lane Motor Museum in Nashville is my favorite one, and was the scene of our memorable 2016 CC Meet-Up. One of the main draws for me was their collection of Tatras, including this T87, seen here just about to land on its side. The Lane has a firm commitment to keeping all their cars fully driveable, and employees take home cars to keep them exercised.
A slightly more ambitious form of exercise was undertaken recently by journalist Sam Smith, on behalf of Hagerty Media. As part of their “Death Eaters” series, the T87 was driven 70 miles to Kentucky’s NCM Motorsports Park, where it was put through its paces to ascertain whether its reputation for tricky handling and “Nazi Killer” were justified.
It turns out it was, in the right hands and circumstances.
There was a preview: On the 70 mile drive to the track, cruising along at 70 or so, Smith encountered a buffet of wind from a passing semi. It sent the heavily loaded (63% of its weight) rear end stuffed with a 2.5 L hemi head air cooled V8 wagging back and forth, decidedly on its own volition. It eventually settled down, but Smith said it was the most disconcerting experience since 2015 when the Ferrari 488 he was track testing lost a wheel.
The moniker “Nazi Killer” is based on the story that Hitler forbade his top SS and Wehrmacht officers from driving the T87 because several were killed on high speed autobahn crashes. Who knows if it’s true; what is known is that Hitler and his officers were also in love with the big Tatras, and Hitler was adamant that his Volkswagen would “be like a Tatra”. Of course Porsche already had been working on a similar rear-engine concept for years, as described in my article “Who’s The Real Father of the Volkswagen”. And true to form for any article on the Tatra and VW, Smith regurgitates the falsehoods that the VW was just a crib of the Tatra, as well as a few others. I should send him a link to my article.
It was well known that the first big rear engine Tatra, the T77, had serious handling issues, and that supposedly these were mitigated to some extent or another with the successor T87. But the combination of a V8 hanging out the back end and swing axles with skinny tires and a high roll center were still a recipe for disaster in the wrong circumstances or hands.
This is precisely why Porsche used the smallest, shortest and lightest engine possible in the VW, and insisted on an expensive magnesium case for the engine. He was determined to reduce the rear weight bias as much as possible, and it really did make a substantial difference. Of course VWs were rolled, invariably in the hands of drivers who didn’t know how to drive a rear engine oversteering car, meaning slow down before the curve and then keep on the gas going through it. And of course, the Corvair’s much heavier six cylinder engine exacerbated its snap oversteer issues.
The testing at the track went well enough, with Smith becoming familiar with the Tatra’s tail-out behavior in a wide range of speeds and turns. As Smith said:
The morning had gone well so far. I was interested, albeit wary, when the Tatra began to slide its rear tires in testing. The car was uniquely odd in a hundred ways but controllable, even predictable, once you learned its habits. We tried big slides and shorter ones, quick steps out and longer dramatic arcs, and the rear tires returned to grip either abruptly or gradually, depending on momentum and how much leash you were willing to give the helm. Above all, the engine’s mass and the rear suspension gave a domino effect in corners—once the Tatra’s substantial mass began moving in a given direction, the tail was following come hell or high water, even if the driver changed his mind. So long as you avoided trailed brake (the rear suspension would jack and hang) and kept your foot deep in the throttle (lifting in a corner transferred weight in a way that took acres of road to fix), the car seemed almost docile.
The rear tires were clearly being pushed hard, and that raises some questions. The T87 was of course originally conceived and sold with the bias-ply tires of the time. Bias ply tires are softer in the tread, but have a decidedly stiffer sidewall, or the inverse of radial ply tires. The T87 was shod with steel-belted Michelin X tires, a particular type that replicates as they were in the 1950s. It was known and understood that these had different characteristics than the bias ply tires.
The Tatra didn’t like gross attitude changes at any point, and it could seem recalcitrant, simply unwilling to shift mood once committed. As testing progressed, the rear axle’s behavior left us concerned about what would happen if one of the intensely stressed Michelins separated from the rim. After Lane personnel added five psi of pressure, I did a loop of the skidpad to feel things out.
The result was a shouting testament to how a vehicle’s suspension is the sum of its parts, and how engineers choose spring and damper rates to work with a given amount of grip. The added pressure allowed the tire to hold its shape more in corners, and the resultant added traction gave enough additional body roll that the Tatra’s inside wheel would hike a little and spin under power in corners. Emergency maneuvers were less consistent and made me more uncomfortable, so we proceeded with caution. The next run, when I went to initiate a gentle, first-gear spin—essentially a slide uncaught, no steering correction—the car went over.
And just what caused that?
It’s all here in this picture. Look at the outside rear tire: it’s practically popping off the rim. I don’t know if this shot was just before the flip or not, but this is the kiss of…a flip. And it’s exactly what Ralph Nader described in detail in his book “Unsafe At Any Speed” about the Corvair’s killer instincts. What happens is that as the rear end comes around, the swing axles tend to jack up, creating positive camber. The excessive forces on the outside rear wheel cause the tire to buckle under or even pop off the rim altogether, allowing the steel rim to contact the pavement.
As the rim digs into the pavement, any further sideways motion is stopped abruptly, so naturally the rear end of the car jacks up drastically and flips over. It’s the only and obvious outcome, thanks to the laws of physics.
And there is that inevitable outcome, from a tight corner taken at a mere 20 mph, which still involves considerable masses and centrifugal forces. More than enough to land the six-figure Tatra on its side.
Smith’s take on the tires:
The simple answer is that the lower pressure let the Michelins deform enough to approximate the behavior of bias-ply rubber. Regardless, when the outside wheel went into compression, the newly compressed axle acted as fulcrum. The car’s mass simply pivoted around it, and up she went.
I’m not sure I agree. Bias ply tires have significantly stiffer sidewalls, so relatively lower pressure on the Michelins (to approximate the behavior of bias ply tires) likely exacerbated the situation. The degree of tire deformation on that back wheel is shocking and surprising, given the low speed. I’m not speaking as a tire expert, but from what I’ve picked up over the years about the differences between bias and radials, and steel belted radials and fabric belted ones.
Back in the day when I had two VWs, I shod them with Semperit fabric-belted radials precisely because I had read on more than one occasion that the steel-belted Michelins were riskier to use on rear-engine cars because the stiffer steel belts caused a more abrupt break-away when its limits had been reached, exacerbating precisely the kind of behavior seen here by the T87. Semperits and Pirellis were common on VWs and Porsches, much more so than the Michelins of the times. Those qualities of the Michelins undoubtedly improved over the decades.
The onlookers all pitched in to push the T87 back on its feet.
“It was a limousine,” Jeff Lane told me, after the rollover. He gave one of those what-can-you-do shrugs. “It’ll go around a corner faster than you think it should, but it wasn’t designed to be driven like this.” He’s not wrong. The unfortunate catch, of course, is that people did drive it like that, and a reputation solidified, and there you go.
And with that, testing continued.
So what did Smith prove? What everyone who has ever driven a T87 knows all too well: one needs to drive it with respect and consideration of its huge abilities as well as its foibles. And in the hands of those that respected that, it was a superbly comfortable car, highly capable under all manner of circumstances, including a 3½ year trip around the world in 1947 by Miroslav Zikmund and Jiří Hanzelka, two Czechoslovakians. Tatra supplied the T87, and they took it to the ends of the earth, literally.
Those that have experience with the T87 will tend to come down in two camps: they have either come to grips with its inherent limitations, respect them, but are comfortable with it. And there are those that have been terrified by it.
Swing axles were a milestone development, as they eliminated the huge unsprung weight of the heavy rear axles and hard springs of the times. Ride quality, especially over the generally rougher roads of the times, was greatly increased, and handling was too, as long as it didn’t involve V8 engines at the rear and the kind of maneuvers that provoked its bad habits. Ultimately, it comes down to knowing its characteristics and respecting them.
This is the same car when I shot it at the Lane in 2016. And undoubtedly by the next time I get back there, as soon as possible, it will be back to its pristine self. But it will have had some new experiences under its belt.
Hagerty Media article here Images by Andrew Trahan
Related CC reading:
Automotive History: Who’s The True Father of the Volkswagen?
Automotive History: Hans Ledwinka’s Tatras
I would take the view that you shouldn’t treat an old Tatra in this way, and if you wanted to explore the handling anyway then it should be done on period-correct tyres. Surely the Nazis didn’t drive them on radials, and the factory never designed them for radials? (And I have always striven to avoid Michelin radials… )
I agree Uncle Mellow.
Agreed! Sacrilege. If you MUST push the poor old girl to its limits to prove a point, at least fit bias-ply tires, with correct period pressures, and use outriggers, as was done when rollover testing the Beetle. Even then, the constant balancing of the car on its edge eventually ruined the outside rims.
So much rollover footage is available for Corvairs, Beetles, etc., that this test doesn’t really add anything to swing axle behavior.
Why avoid Michelin radials? Are you driving a Corvair or something? They generally score at or near the top in tire tests, including those by Consumer Reports.
Since I brought CR up, they test for and rate tires on a bunch of factors. I wouldn’t buy tires without consulting CR. I didn’t get Michelins given the age of and use of my last vehicle, but got significantly cheaper tires from the middle of the ratings. I was able to pick them based on their performance on factors that mattered more to me. And they lasted until said vehicle’s demise.
Every set of Michelin tires I have ever bought, and that would be in the dozens, has given superb service. I am looking forward to the tires on my Golf wearing out so I can shod it with Michelins.
A picture is worth a thousand lives.
I never came close to flipping VWs or Renaults in 30 years of driving them, because I’m cautious and SLOW. One of my high-school buddies managed to flip his father’s Dauphine at 15 MPH on a sharp left turn, seen on this map. This corner is on a hill with the turn at the bottom, which accentuated the flipping vectors.
My mom flipped her nearly new Dauphine a few years before I was born.
Why didn’t they make some sort of roll structure for the side if they were going to be tempting fate like this?
An aluminum structure wouldn’t have weighed much, and cost a lot less than fixing the car.
Am I misremembering, or was it found that the structure CR put on the Samurais used in their testing exacerbated their roll tendencies? FWIW, I flogged my Samurai hard and never felt like it was going to tip.
IDK if it was the structure specifically, but the main dispute Suzuki had with CR was that they were putting it through a modified course, more than what was routine, in an effort to make it roll.
I don’t see how those outrigger bars couldn’t drastically affect handling, as outstretched weight greatly modifies the involved physics. You’ve likely seen figure skaters spin around in a circle with their arms outstretched, and then after pulling them in to cross their arms over their chest suddenly start spinning faster. Or maybe have tried this yourself spinning on a regular floor. Why would it be any different for a car with outstretched “arms”?
I’ve owned a couple of Tatras, both examples of the post-WW2 Air-cooled rear engined V8 series 603 cars. I’ve also driven several of the T-87 cars as well.
I was impressed with the T-87’s interior roominess and luxurious cabin, and of course the streamlined styling and that air-cooled OHC motor have always captivated me. But I also felt the T-87 handled like a tractor.
By the time Tatra introduced the later T-603, many of the rear axle and weight distribution problems had been solved, as evidenced by the wonderful 1962 promotional film Tatra brought out, showing repeated driving stunts that would have rolled any T-87.
That said, I STILL WANT A TATRA T-87!
Is this the film you’re referring to?
https://youtu.be/J8fNpTSLi80
Clearly Lane just wasn’t wearing the correct driving gloves, to improve his control.
dman,
Yep, that’s the one!
The Tatra T-603 cars have heavy duty flexible U-shaped straps around each swing axle, at the outer end. These won’t allow the swing axle to drop any further than at a safe point before all hell breaks loose. I was told that the engineer replacing Dr. Ledwinka, Dr. Julius Mackerle, insisted on the straps. He’s also credited with the post-war Tatra V8, & while it’s not an OHC motor, it’s still a wonderful design.
Years ago I drove a T2-603 all over England, and routinely took their roundabouts at high speed with nary a problem, turning the steering wheel one way, then the opposite, and back again.
That’s essentially the same thing GM did with the optional sports suspension for the Corvair in 1962-1963. They added limiter straps, as well as reducing rear ride height a bit, to create static negative camber, as well as to limit axle drop (positive camber). It was very effective in reducing the jacking-flipping scenarios which were becoming more common.
I am lucky to possess a copy of the original sales literature for the T87 that my Dad somehow picked up back in the day. Discovered it when I was 14. I’ve been hooked ever since. Gotta hand it to the Lane for the demo, but geez. What’s next? A high speed run in their Dymaxion!
The Dymaxion is squirrely at 20 mph in my opinion. Thanks goodness it can only comfortably do 40mph, top end. Bucky Fuller had aspirations of the Dymaxion car doing 70 mph on the highway. With a rear-steer, front wheel drive set up, that seems to us to be tall order.
Rex, I believe yours is a Dymaxion 1 recreation. Do you think the second series design would be better overall with the improved split chassis and body?
Swing axles can be lethal Triumph Heralds and VWs proved that but of course anything is lethal in the hands of an incompetent driver, Michelins make the best tyres Ive ever driven on but radial ply tyres had yet to be invented when the T87 came to market and bias or crossply tyres have a lot less grip than radials so would prevent this easy rollover by simply letting the car slide plus it may not have the turn in traction for such a maneuver with crossplies on the steer.
Testing and technical analysis reveals Hagerty has too much money.
Yes, their insurance bill is going to go up for sure. Oh wait.
I went back and read the Hagerty article, very interesting and well written. I can’t believe they would do this and then have the chutzpah to say “after the accident”. Err, that wasn’t an accident. That was pushing it until something bad happened.
Hopefully they won’t wreck a car for each Chapter of the series.
Almost as much as NIHS in 2009. “Hey, let’s do an offset impact with a 1959 Chevy and a 2009 Chevy .” Not like 50 years of crash analysis would have shown the same result
In that case they did know pretty much what would happen, but they weren’t crashing an antique Tatra. The videos are very instructive. It’s so dramatic and obvious that denialists will post conspiracy theories about how the engine was removed from the ’59 or something. I posted a video of that just the other day somewhere on YouTube where there were all those They Don’t Build Them Like They Usta comments on some 1950’s car video.
Not that I don’t love those oldies and DD’d a 40+ year old ’62 Lincoln for years. I figured if it was in a low speed crash (probably caused by the kinetic energy of my 5000 lbs plus drum brakes) I would still win.
Tatra didn’t like gross attitude changes at any point, and could seem recalcitrant, simply unwilling to shift mood once committed.
Describes me to a tee(87), but you don’t see me rolling on the floor for no reason.
Seriously though, I would love to see video of this accident. It’s hard to judge the angle of attack of that turn / slide maneuver. Although at that speed, really, nothing remotely so severe should have happened.
Sometimes, in Czech streamliner, the axle swings you. Put the correct tyres next time. And remember, they didn’t nickname it Czechoslovakia’s secret weapon for no reason (apocryphal, I know… But it’s funny because it could be true.)
One thing not mentioned here in the discussion of tire pressures is what front-rear pressure differentiaI was used. have very little driving experience with rear engined or even front engined swing axle vehicles, though I’ve driven some of each it was all at low speeds. But I did auto cross (tight, low speed courses) and road race stock, skinny tired FWD vehicles with soft suspension, and in the case of my Fiesta, pretty significant camber change in front.
Obviously the opposite of the Tatra, but in any case, on the track I’d run 45 psi front and about 30 rear to both reduce tire “rollover” in front, as well as try to mitigate understeer. On the autocross courses, I’d run an even more greater delta, maybe 50-25. This was with 155-12 tires on my Fiesta, with slightly less extreme pressures in the 155-13’s on my better suspended but still stock Civic. Not sure if it would make as much difference in the Tatra, but lowering the front pressures would perhaps have balanced the front rear grip regardless of sidewall/tread stiffness and swing axle “jacking”.
I was left back at the museum during all of this, but was kept informed of the happenings. Jeff Lane claims to have spent more seat time in Tatras, especially this one, than anyone in modern times in the Western hemisphere (I can’t disagree with that).
I have driven the 87 several times, but never to its extremes. Just speed limit on surface streets, giving rides to museum guests. But, yes, one must respect the weight bias. Maybe its because of my history with my VW Beetle, and my DeLorean now, of how to handle a rear-engined car.
The staff that was there that day of course believe the extra psi (not much, only 4 or 5) in the modern tire is the culprit. The photographer (sorry, no video) first noticed the tire trying to come off the rim, which led to the decision to increase psi. This was erring on the side of caution, as they didn’t want the tire to come off, but this was a then-unexpected result. Hindsight is 20/20.
The T87 has already been sent off, sans engine, to re-restore the paint and body work. The filler that chipped off of the body suggested this may have happened before during this car’s lifetime.
Hi Rex,
Thanks for the additional insight. I agree that the tires were undoubtedly a factor, but I’m struggling to understand how increasing the pressure would have caused this. It seems to me that the more pressure in the back tires, the better, since it would make the tire stiffer, making it more likely to slide rather than to buckle and/or deform, which would tend to cause an abrupt transition and flip.
I’m just applying my own logic, and from what I’ve read.
Do you know the actual tire pressures used, front/rear?
I just spoke with staff that was there that day. The rear tire pressure was in the low 30s, they remember, and increased it to about 38 psi, well within the tire regulations. The staff tends to agree with Sam’s explanation, that the stiffer sidewall caused the swing axle to hop, not the tire to slide. But your assessment seems plausible too. I’m just underinformed as to what the exact culprit could have been.
Thanks. It would be difficult to determine absolutely what exactly it was, but Sam’s explanation sounds plausible too.
Almost certainly the biggest factor may have been the driving. Sam did say that he initiated a “a gentle, first-gear spin—essentially a slide uncaught, no steering correction”. The lack of any steering correction, which even a semi-knowledgeable driver would have done, probably was the biggest factor. That’s not to say he did anything wrong per se, since he did it on purpose to test the responses of the car. But the result seems to speak for itself. He found out what it would do with “no steering correction”.
Back in my autocross days, the rule of thumb and also trial and error (in a front engine, RWD small car) taught us that increasing rear tire pressure brought increased understeer, by virtue of the rear tires tracking better and not sliding. If you wanted the rear tires to “slide out” a bit at speed in the corners, reducing understeer, then reduce rear tire pressure. This was on radials.
The analogy here might be that adding the five pounds of rear tire pressure encouraged the rear tires to grip better rather than slide, and encouraged the tipping behavior “built in” to the car.
Secondly, each car and combination of tires, settings, and parts will ultimately either spin at the limit, or tip. My old autocrossing Mazda RX3, very fast, tipped at the limit. After a few two wheel corners, way up on two, the car had to be retired, because the ultimate end was simply a matter of time. The replacement RX7 was never as competitive, but always spun and never went up on two wheels. Better to be less competitive than to emulate Hitler’s Generals riding in a Tatra.
Finally, a car with the T87’s characteristics, while they can be tamed and “driven around” by a skilled and competent driver, cannot be driven around such things as hitting a seam in the pavement at speed, the evasive maneuvers at speed when a car suddenly pulls out of a side street in front of it, or perhaps a blown out tire while at speed. The common denominators are unexpected circumstances combined with speed. I’m not sure any parking lot tests could have either replicated or addressed such circumstances.
Agreed.
Exactly, see my comment above based on autocross and road course experience in FWD cars (with increased front tire pressure). But there are multiple variables in play here. Too much pressure could reduce grip, or differences between front and rear can affect relative slip angles and exacerbate under-or oversteer. Heck, higher pressure can increase the rolling diameter and raise the CG. Suspension geometry and vehicle dynamics are complicated.
Some years ago I read a piece by a writer who was driven around Tatra’s test track by a factory driver in a Tatra T613 or T700 (essentially the same car). The T613/700 had better weight distribution and a better rear suspension than previous Tatras, but the writer said the driver still seemed to find the car a handful.
In the 1930s employees of Tatra’s automotive division were allowed to take company cars home for the weekend. I assume that not many people owned cars in Czechoslovakia at the time, and they appreciated this perk.
At one point a delegation of employees from the railroad-car division approached Ledwinka and said that they should get the same perk. Ledwinka said, “Gentlemen, I have no objection. Take a coach and go anywhere you like.”
I sure wish this site had up/down voting. I kept wanting to give a ↑↑↑↑ to a lot of comments.
And Corvairs had recommended tire pressure of 15/28 F/R or so. 16/24 for VW Bugs. Of course a lot of people didn’t pay attention to the different pressure thing, leading to Even More Unsafe At Any Speed.
A college friend of mine rolled a swing axle Bug on the highway in non-icy conditions. Being roundish and strong (the car, not him) he was fine. I seem to remember other people doing that back then. No idea if he knew about the right tire pressures, but he was a physics major. Anyway, a whole lot better than a frontal collision in those things.
Also, once again, an editing function.
My point if it wasn’t obvious is that the Tatra should definitely have had a similar tire pressure difference F/R for all the same reasons. Substantially higher tire pressure in the rear, not the front. And yes, not running on radials. It’s hard to understand why they didn’t get these concepts with their valuable irreplaceable antique. I’m no expert and never owned a VW or Corvair and I knew all that already.
Is that their only one/when will it be back home from the hospital? I’m planning a visit in a few months. Can I be an honorary employee and drive something back to the Comfort Inn?
When I was a kid I had a VW beetle and on wet days I drove it sideways for the most part in a similar way to my Ford Escort of the time and had no problems with late braking etc….it was simple and completely easy to control…so I dunno…I could also gear down and pull on the clutch and get a loud backfire right next to pedestrians I thought needed a wakeup call. Loved that car.
I notice the Tatra has a similar development to the much later Red Bull F1 cars which everyone followed untill banned with the central tail fin ha ha. I wonder if it reduces drag at high speed or corrects overseer on high speed corners? Maybe they should have made it much bigger…or maybe they should have used an decent set of tires and wheels and widened the wheelbase somewhat….
Bemused bill,
Remember, this car was designed in the early to mid 1930s, and introduced in 1936. Compared to ANY other production car of the time, this was truly a cutting-edge automobile, but the understandings of airflow and drag coefficiency were still in their infancy.
The concept of stabilizing fins was understood for airplanes, but automobiles presented a different situation. Airplanes tend to stay in constant forward motion, making slow changes to direction, but cars are constantly and quickly changing direction and speed, so a fin isn’t going to help as much as the engineers thought.
By the time the Tatra T-603 was introduced 20 years later, the company [and the automotive industry] realized the central fin really wasn’t effective in providing stability. But ya got to admit it still looks cool today!
The primary tendency for these cars to flip was not caused by the tires, but by the problem of the swing axle tucking in on high speed cornering, and sometimes even on low speed cornering, as in this example. Add to that the heavy engine sticking out behind the rear axle, and you have a serious stability problem, something that was not yet understood in the mid 1930s.
Later Tatra cars solved that weight problem as well, with the 1956 T-603 cars that had a 46/54 Ft/Rr weight ratio, and in 1969 with the T613 cars, Tatra moved the engine forward and moved the rear axle back, making it a mid-engine.
John Steinbeck imported one to the US, later owned by Karl Ludvigsen whose article on it, “Shampooing the Lion” is on the internet.
https://velocetoday.com/the-tatra-type-87/
From that article; “After WWII, one car was obtained from Germany by the British Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders and assigned to Vauxhall for evaluation.”
I wonder how many of those Vauxhall engineers were reassigned to GM in Detroit for the Corvair project?
I’ve been in a (double) roll over. I have no intention or wish of trying to do it again.
But kudos to the Museum for using and exploring their collection
A swing axle suspended car flips at 20 mph, where’s justy baum ?? 🙂
I cut my teeth on my mother’s Ford Prefect, but my own first three cars were Dauphines, rear engine swing axles, and as a young driver I did many unauthorised things with those buggies. One of the first was a 180 deg. spin on a wet road, others included a 90 degree corner at about 35 mph with a cop behind me (underved police escort, I thought). Never once flipped. Maybe I was just lucky.
In the case of a rear engine, the rear tire pressure must be 0.8 bar higher than the front tires. Very important. The manual has exactly that.