Two of the biggest new motorcycle releases of the past twelve months have been BMW’s new cruiser, the R18, and Harley’s new adventure bike, the Pan America. Although I know we focus mostly on cars here, and older ones at that, I thought it would be of interest to share a bit of the technology and history behind these new offerings.
I’ll start with the BMW. BMW’s motorcycle division has often gone in a different direction than the cars. With a few exceptions, until well into the 21st century BMW did not offer a true high performance two-wheeler. And in the sixties, when first the Neue Klasse and then the 1602/2002 set new standards for compact performance, BMW’s flat twins were conservative large touring bikes (in those days 500-600cc was considered big, except for Harley) with adequate but not exciting performance, and little changed for decades. Above is pictured a typical mid-sixties 500 cc BMW R50, or as they were dubbed in some English-speaking countries, “Black mit White”. More a two-wheeled Mercedes 300SE (or maybe even a German Buick) than a BMW 2002. Until the /5 series was introduced in 1970, most BMW models used leading link, rather than telescopic, forks. And while Honda was the first major manufacturer to offer a front disc brake on their new 750 in 1969, and the British and other Japanese manufacturers followed soon after, BMW didn’t offer a front disc on the standard models until the /6 in 1974. It wasn’t until the 2014 launch of the S1000R superbike that Munich offered a true high performance motorcycle like the M-series cars. Nevertheless, most BMW bikes took a strongly European approach to their design and engineering, with a compromise of features and specs to provide balanced usability.
That’s hardly the case with the new R18 cruiser, whose engine is shown above. It is once again a pushrod flat twin, with some understated old-school design details. But it has little else in common with either the other flat twins in BMW’s current lineup, or that old R50. But before we get into that, a few words about Harley Davidson. Despite having a little diversity on the outer edges of the company, including some quite sporting Italian-built machinery through the late seventies, and until recently, a dominant flat track racing V Twin in the form of the XR750, Harley has focused on large touring and cruising bikes. In the traditional American style, they are large displacement with low specific output, heavy, and designed more for straight roads than twisty canyons. For many owners, the bike as delivered is just the starting point for major modifications, to increase power and add style.
Especially recently, the “bagger” style, with saddle bags and a small fairing, has become very popular; a hot rod touring bike if you will. Kind of a cross between a muscle car, and a brougham or personal luxury coupe. Nevertheless, after a longish period of poor quality and 1960’s vintage technology, a modern Harley is fairly refined under that muscle brougham exterior. A contemporary automotive analogy might be the Cadillac Escalade, if Cadillac offered factory-optional speed equipment and even more chrome.
Harley sales go up and down with the economy, but there is no question that it is the dominant American cruiser brand, where cruiser is the industry term for street bikes that emphasize style and perhaps some straight line performance, over handling or smooth silent freeway manners. And BMW wanted a piece of that action. They had tried before with modified versions of their air-oil cooled 1200cc flat twin, but it wasn’t a success. So they decided to out-Harley Harley, from scratch. Only the flat twin architecture and shaft drive would remain. And, at least for this first year, the “Black mit White” colorway.
What they came up with is a huge, low, heavy bike. While other BMW flat twins max out at 1250 cc, the R18, as its name suggests, is a massive 1802 cc, 901 cc per cylinder. Four valves per cylinder, yes – but pushrod actuated. Rider-selectable drive modes, yes – but they’re called Rock, Roll, and Rain. No Sport or Eco modes here, not to mention no electronic suspension settings as are offered on many other BMW’s. The power peak, 91 BHP, is reached at a mere 4750 rpm, 1000 rpm below redline. The torque peaks at 3750 rpm, with 95% of peak torque available as low as 2000 rpm. But despite these old-school numbers, the engineering details of this large displacement pushrod twin are quite sophisticated to give the broad torque range and compliance with strict Euro5 emissions regulations. Four valves per cylinder and large bores (the engine is oversquare) help breathing and clean combustion. Sophisticated intake port design improves swirl and helps prevent detonation at the low rpm, large throttle openings that the powerband encourages. Despite the classic finned cylinder appearance, a large oil cooler and oil passages throughout the cylinders, heads and crankcase keep engine temperatures controlled.
It wouldn’t be a BMW flat twin without shaft drive. But what a shaft! Exposed, chrome plated. Look at that U-joint. In summary, a huge torquey motor, a low slung chassis, and lots of bling. But has BMW gone too far? In one recent comparison test against an equivalent Harley, the American bike was deemed to be a generally better, more functional motorcycle. Faster, more comfortable, and better handling.
As I mentioned earlier, BMW’s car and motorcycle divisions often went in quite different directions. After a brief period in the mid-seventies, when hopped-up BMW 900cc flat twins had some success in superbike roadracing, before the Japanese four cylinder bikes and Ducati V Twins took over, BMW looked for other market segments where their less powerful flat twins could be successful. In 1980 they launched the R80 G/S seen above, later versions suffixed as GS, for Gelände/Straße (German for off-road/road) or Gelände Sport (off-road sport) respectively; true BMW-philes are very careful about the proper punctuation. This was a new category of bike, best explained as the motorcycle equivalent of a Range Rover. Extremely capable off road, though not necessarily tight and rugged trails, and very comfortable on road. Not to mention stylish in the urban environment. These bikes were hugely successful for BMW, becoming their best selling range, and spawning competition from all the Japanese and other European manufacturers. In addition, between factory accessories and a huge global aftermarket industry, the GS bikes can be outfitted as comfortable highway tourers or round the world off-pavement explorers.
Above is an example of the current R1250GS, in Motorsport trim. Although these bikes are large and heavy, in the hands of a good rider they can handle extremely rough terrain at high speed, not something that I think could be said of a four-wheeled BMW X5.
And apparently the same is true of Harley’s new 1250 Pan America. Is it a coincidence that it’s also a 1250 like the newest GS? And comes within pounds or millimeters of the GS’s other specs?
The new Harley is the antithesis of the BMW R18 in more ways than just its mission. Here’s the BMW’s instrumentation, a lone speedometer with a small digital display. Note that it’s shown in “Rock” mode.
And here is the Harley Pan America’s instrument display.
Modern electronics, rider modes (Sport, Road, Rain, Off-Road, and Off-Road Plus – no Rock’n’Roll here), even an optional suspension lowering function which reduces seat height so shorter riders can touch the ground as the bikes slows to a stop. Now that’s a feature some high end SUV’s have, but not BMW’s GS. At least not this year.
Initial reviews have been extremely favorable. This seems to be a Harley that can go fast off road, and on pavement too. Its 1250 cc overhead cam V Twin puts out far more power than the BMW 1800, 150 bhp at 9000 rpm. It’s valvetrain isn’t quite as accessible as the BMW with its heads poking out, but who needs to get in there? The Harley has the traditional Milwaukee hydraulic lifters.
The Harley is fitted with Brembo brakes, which have become a necessary piece of performance bling. The BMW? It has polished aluminum calipers with the letters BMW prominently displayed.
The big question is whether this bike will appeal to the die-hard Harley guys. I think so. I’m sure a lot of “traditional” Harley owners have Ford Raptors or Dodge Power Wagons, or offroad UTV’s. And even those who don’t venture off pavement should find the upright riding position and tremendous power appealing. And the non-Harley “adventure” guys? If the bike works, and dealers are easier to find than BMW or KTM, that will be an advantage. Harley’s initial pricing is very competitive. As for the BMW R18? I think it will only find a niche market. Ridden to Starbucks on Saturday morning, then washed and polished all afternoon. But I could be wrong.
Note: Although I have been riding motorcycles for almost 50 years, and currently own two, I have never ridden a Harley. I have owned one BMW. If I was 20 years younger I would seriously consider the Pan America. But before buying one, I would head over to the BMW dealership, where I would admire the R18 for a minute in the showroom, and then ask about a 1250GS test ride.
Thanks for the great post, I was a rider of various bikes for 35 years, 25 of those on HDs. HD has some impressive new bikes, they are much more powerful that the ones that I rode, with over twice the h.p. Not to mention the new electric Livewire. I remember well the old Earl’s fork, black BMWs. The Honda shop that I frequented as a kid sold them. Us young guys thought that they were bikes for old men, solid, well built, reliable, but they were respected. They were the sign of a serious touring rider, someone that would ride across the continent at the drop of a hat. They were also expensive. They were replaced by the outstanding Honda Goldwing, which became the long hauler’s favorite. The big H.D. touring bikes in the 70’s and 80’s were nowhere near as capable as the Wing, Beemer or other Japanese bikes, but there were still some die hard H.D.dresser riders that used them for the long tour. Unfortunately the Harley became the boutique bike of the poser, being trailered to big “Biker” events. Hopefully the Harleys might win back some of their credibility.
There are so many Harley’s on the roads here that it’s hard not to get distracted by the “boutique” riders. As the saying goes, a Harley dealership is a T shirt shop with a few motorcycles for decor. But actually, they sell well and the dealers (or corporate marketing) are smart enough to know that a showroom filled with bikes stacked up against each other, like many Honda etc shops, is not a great retail experience. Also, I take a lot of road trips in the West, and there’s a heck of a lot of Harley’s out on the roads in heat, wind, rain, cold, miles from the nearest bar or casino. Oops, I fell into stereotyping there.
Very interesting, thanks. I’ve seen reviews of the Harley but not the BMW. My own take (after reading this) is that the BMW will do alright, but not as great as they hope it will, similar to the last attempt, what, about two decades ago now? Besides Harley, the Indian line looks quite compelling and there are still the Japanese wanna-bes soaking up the (somewhat) smaller budgets of some riders. The BMW doesn’t fit with the rest of the BMW line-up either really, whereas a renewed “toaster” would be far more interesting.
The H-D on the other hand looks extremely compelling and I kind of think they (management anyway) are trying to expand their pool of buyers rather than sell these to existing fans. To that end though it’ll come down to the dealers, a Adventure Tourer rider used to BMW, Ducati, MV Agusta etc is far, far different than at least the stereotypical HD rider or staff and the way the product is presented. Kind of like the difference between a Ford or Chevy dealer vs a BMW dealer. A lot of overlapping price points and products that can be compelling and at least on paper, competing with each other to some extent, but a very different vibe both in the initial sale as well as subsequent service. Perhaps a greater leap even than the Buell “experiment”.
For me, although I find H-D in general to have an extremely heavy load of baggage to tote around, I don’t really find their traditional motorcycles themselves off-putting, there’s a difference between the machinery and the culture around it. In particular though I find this motorcycle as well as the electric ones (Livewire) they’ve starting offering extremely interesting. I think my own motorycycling days are well past me, but do hope these catch on, H-D needs to be successful at more than just appealing to the Sturgis crowd.
There’s quite a bit online about the HD dealer training for the Pan America. Looks like HD corporate, at least, gets it. As a four wheeled analogy, I wonder if Ford dealerships will understand the hardcore off-roaders who may be interested in the new Bronco. I suspect most Jeep dealers get the “Jeep thing”. Ford? I don’t know.
The difference is that there are plenty of people who will want a Bronco as a grocery getter. Apart from people desperate to buy American or someone who has an adventure bike and a Harley and wants his new adventurer to be “in the family” – who is buying this thing? Not traditional Harley people.
It seems akin to Alfa Romeo deciding to go toe to toe with the Camry or Nissan building a Wrangler-a-like, in that it will have to get stupendous reviews and be keenly priced to get the necessary shoppers into the Harley showroom.
Syke makes a good point- this coulda shoulda been a Buell.
That’s quite the cruiser there, by BMW, Looks like these two are squaring off. Thanks for keeping me up on an area that I have not kept up on, except for reading about HD’s Live Wire. It’ll be interesting to see what BMW does in the electric sphere.
Best money I ever spent was a ’66 BMW R60/2. Second best money I ever spent was a second /2, a ’60, but with a /5 750 replacing the nearly-silent stock 600cc unit. It’s just a perfect bike in my l’il opinion. Simple, smooth, poised, unkillable. The Earles fork works beautifully, with no dive, rather a slight rise upon braking.
That HD is so, so, so damn big. Having had to unearth myself from beneath an Aprilia ETX enduro bike following a toes-breaking shunt and put it upright, I’d be a dead guy under the HD. Get it back on its wheels? Nawp.
I’m from back when people were shorter and lived near the water- literally too small to wrestle the thing.
This new BMW cruiser is not such an offense to the eyes as the R1200c, shown below.
It makes a Rune look subtle.
Thanks for reminding me that the C was a 1200; I had alluded to a custom based on the R1100, corrected now. I agree that the new BMW is gorgeous, but I’m not sure that a machine that’s heavier, slower and has less cornering clearance and suspension travel than a Harley, can get by on looks alone.
I wish I found the BMW R18 cruisebike attractive, let alone gorgeous- it has the compromised look of a focus-group verdict instead of a singular vision.
I wouldn’t spot it in a parking lot full of cruisers, it does not stand out.
Now, here is the ‘Harley’ I always found want-able- the one HD bought and stuck an AMF/Harley sticker onto. Back in the day we’d see a few of these go racin’.
Once again, your comment may prompt me to make a correction to my post. I wrote that I have never ridden a Harley, but seeing this HD branded Aermacchi reminds me that the first ever motorized two wheeler that I rode was a friend’s 65 cc (?) Harley, which of course had never been anywhere near Milwaukee and was an Aermacchi from Varese, Italy. It was a two stroke too. Harley’s Italian links are quite interesting. Unlike recently, when HD’s “small” bikes, the now defunct Street 500 and 750 failed after just a few years, the horizontal single Aermacchi HD’s had a successful racing history in both American flat track and international road racing.
And to be clear, I do find the R18 to be stunning vehicular sculpture. But as an actual motorcycle, no way.
Aermacchis hit the same love-note as the Guzzi Falcone…just got that thing about ’em.
If I recall correctly at least one shop got hold of an R18 and did a remake/remodel, tightened it up a bit and the result was actually pretty snappy.
Forgot to mention, great job on the article. Nice to read some bike stuff here.
The boxer engine is inherently incompatible with the feet-forward cruiser posture. BMW’s attempt to meld the two resulted in a very long wheelbase, as well as handlebar with verrry long pull back.
The R18 is exquisite in detail, but the overall proportion is somewhat awkward.
As an alternative, remember the suave, sophisticated, good-looking and educated motorcyclist will always be seen on a Triumph. Plus, a Triumph rider will save money by not needing HD or BMW jewelry, clothing or tattoos.
Agreed.
Don’t forget the money needed for a huge beer belly. They are standard Harley issue. So is the trailer to move the bike to Harley shows like Sturgis.
As a disinterested observer it seems to me that the modern Triumph rider is more merchandise prone than his BMW counterpart.
+1 based on the comment above. Japanese bikes are usually superior. BTW Triumphs are assembled in Thailand.
It’s been said that you don’t buy a Harley, you buy a lifestyle. That pretty much sums it up, and H-D is quite adept at keeping up that image.
Of course, time marches on, and the very market that had taken H-D to dizzying heights, was now endangering them to younger buyers. So, they’ve had to adapt, but be careful in how they went about it. I’m not a big fan of Harleys (or motorcycles, in general), but have to admit Harley is taking what seems to be some solid steps to maintain solvency for the future. I’m not buying any of that Harley-branded crap, but there are a lot of people who do.
Interesting, I was aware of both these bikes but hadn’t thought of them going after each others market.
Normally I’m a Honda guy, but my current bike is a Kawasaki and the only motorcycle T-shirt I own is branded BSA. So although neither the BMW or the Harley is attractive to me I hope they are to somebody, I would welcome more young riders.
If I were going to wear a motorcycle t-shirt, something like a Vincent Black Lightning seems cool.
The BMW has an absolutely perfect balance of black and chrome. Only thing I don’t care for are the stamped exhaust pipes.
To each his own, butt……. Of my 72 bikes over the decades, 5 were H-Ds and 4 were BMWs altho my first Beemer (a ’94 R1100RS) I owned twice so did I have 5 BMWs?
At any rate the rest (other than 2 Ducatis) were all Japanese, mostly Hondas. To me my ’91 Honda VFR 750F is the bike I simply find to be the best of all 72. Its looks, handling, power, comfort and brakes combine to form a superlative all around street bike. Unfortunately Honda answered the ? nobody asked and DEvolved the VFR into a over priced, LARGE 1200cc bike that AFAIK was a sale$ flop…………oop$. DFO
Yep. I own a ’96 VFR and you are 1000% correct. Damn near perfect allarounder.
Heck, I knew the VFR was done when it went to FI and 800cc, and especially when it left the geartrain valvetrain behind. One of Honda’s true greats. The earlier models are nonetheless terrific.
Such a great bike. Had a friend who’d do the MN1000 every year on his VFR, that puppy had over 100,000 on the clock, guy was getting near convinced it was broken in.
I’ll second that, I demoed a VFR750 in 91 and was really impressed with the detailing as well as the performance. Honda had some great bikes in the early 90s. The PC800 was a genuinely nice tourer/city bike, the Hawk GT earned its cult following and the GB500 was ahead of its time.
The only other Honda street bike I liked as much as the VFR750 was the ST1300, which is the only touring bike I’d consider other than a BMW R1200RT. The Gold Wing is surprisingly quick and agile but it’s still way to much bike for my taste.
I’m pleased to see the R18 is still trying to look like an old BMW rather than a flat twin Harley.
I don’t see the Harley adventure bike selling well, although it is a brave move. Their last attempt, the Buell Ulysses sold like warm beer in July.
This isn’t the first time H-D copied BMW, back in WWII they took some captured BMWs and used them to design the Harley-Davidson XA military motorcycle which was a 750cc sidevalve flat twin with shaft drive.
If Harley-Davidson does end up going under, like so many blogs and YouTube video are (wishfully?) predicting, history will show that the dropping of the Buell line was the major nail in the coffin. They may not have been perfect, but they were good bikes, interesting bikes, and had a chance of appealing to a clientele who wouldn’t be caught dead on a “real Harley-Davidson.”
Oh yeah, that concept of a “real Harley-Davidson” and living in terror of a customer saying that has probably done more damage to the company than any other single thing.
Thanks for interesting comments. For those hadn’t seen my own MOAL (Motorcycles of a Lifetime) from a few years ago, it’s here https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/two-wheelers/motorcycles-of-a-lifetime-two-wheels-are-more-fun/. No changes to the fleet since then.
I wish they had made an updated BMW R50 instead of this behemoth. The styling of the R18 is so retro and 1930’s especially with those mufflets that there may be no one alive that recalls it. The engine is at least 800cc bigger than it needs to be and BMW has made 1200cc motors making 40 more horsepower than this 1800cc beast. 750 pound motorcycles are awfully hard to pick up when the kickstand sinks into hot asfault. I’ve owned BMWs since 1984. I’ll keep my K75S thank you.
I think you’re missing the whole point. It’s not supposed to be a better motorcycle, it’s supposed to be an alternative, and probably better, Harley.
Jumping into this one a bit late, had a re-enactment followed by a baseball doubleheader yesterday. Really love the new Harley, having owned an adventure bike in the past (2000 Triumph Tiger, which I found out was better on fire trails than the vaunted BMW R-GS).
Definitely Harley-Davidson needs to do something besides cruisers and dressers, if only to get some interest from riders who normally wouldn’t be caught dead in a Harley-Davidson dealership. And, as the comments here have well shown, Harley-Davidson is definitely a ‘love or hate’ marque, there seems to be no middle ground.
On the other hand, I detest the R18. Past BMW owner here (R90/6 airhead and a K75C brick), and this bike is an affront to BMW’s history. Yes, it looks like the old, classic, BMW’s but most people forget that the pre-WWII BMW was about half to two-thirds the size of this monstrosity. I’m not sure what BMW is thinking here, but anyone who wants a Harley-style cruiser is most likely going to go with the real thing (notice how the Japanese have pretty much pulled out of that market now that Harley-mania has died?). There are lots of things I look for in a BMW (and I definitely want one more before my riding days are over), but a big, heavy cruiser is not one of them.
Historical point: When BMW was developing the R1200C, the bike was so controversial within the company that the head guy (President? CEO?) was forced out of the company over the decision to bring it to market, such was the vehemence with which he opposed it.
Turns out, he was right.
Agreed, I think BMW would be better off with a nod to more recent heritage by building an R75/5 styled bike off the R1200R or R Nine T and possibly reviving the R850R. That said the 1800cc engine is apparently driven by marketing and Triumph’s equally massive cruiser.
The old R1200C chrome head had a following, but it was nothing like the size of the GS or RT crowd so dropping it was understandable.
Is there any sales data available now to see how BMW’s second attempt at the cruiser market is fairing? Is it costing the other costume bike makers like Triumph and HD any sales?
It’s hard to find accurate model-specific sales data for bikes, but earlier this year HD claimed the PanAmerica was the best selling “adventure touring” bike in the US and Canada. Even if that’s only in the large displacement category, if it’s beating the BMW R1250GS that’s pretty good.
Meanwhile, BMW is also claiming strong sales overall, and crediting the R18 with contributing. One Dutch source suggests 13K units sold which regardless of the time period also seems pretty good. I have seen a few R18’s on this road, for what it’s worth.
Since this article originally posted, I’ve had a chance to to some test riding:
That Harley Pan America is definitely a winner. It rides, it handles, it’s everything that a ‘traditional’ Harley hard core wants nothing to do with. Thank God! No, I’m not trading in my Electra Glide Ultra Classic on one, although for a brief moment after I was done riding I was tempted. For me (at age 71) the big negative is throwing my leg over. If it has the ride height adjuster (I rode both versions), I could make it work, without, forget it. I’ll leave my adventure touring days to my early 50’s when I had that Triumph.
As to the BMW: I have never known I could loathe a BMW this much. Big, fat, ungainly . . . . . . and it’s performance would have the most dedicated Harley-hater thinking that a SuperGlide or Softail is a sport bike by comparison. No. Thank. You. I will seriously consider giving up riding before I’d put one of these as the only motorcycle in my garage.
In what sandy desert environment is it bright and sunny at 3:30 in the morning?
Nice write-up. A minor correction:
“Until the /5 series was introduced in 1970, most BMW models used trailing link, rather than telescopic, forks.”
That should be “leading link forks.”
Good catch. I will correct that. Thanks.
As long as the HD is quiet. That’s all I give a rat’s **** about them.
Quiet Harley dont think they made one
That R18 motor would be great in a Dauphine.
If certain neighborhoods can ban Jake brakes on semi trucks then why do Harley Davidsons get a free pass?
Because the bylaws and regulations are written by and for they who show up the most and holler the loudest, no matter how well or poorly informed they might be, and so sometimes we get misguided motorcycle-related bylaws and regulations and suchlike. The one you cite is basically a codification of loud pipes save lives (which is not the case). There’s a lot of this with motorcycle lighting, too. Flashing brake lights, pulsing or “modulating” headlights, etc.