Gateway Classic Cars is offering this 1958 Buick Special on eBay. Carlsbad Black really shows the chrome off well, and that’s a good thing because this is the least chrome-y 1958 Buick you could buy!
What I really like about this listing is the fact that they have a lot of sharp, close-up shots of the car. We can see all of the fine details that are a testament to the metalworker’s art.
But first a little context . . .
Buick started the ’50s with cars that, along with Cadillac, were the ultimate postwar Dreamboats. It’s as if all the Futuramic fantasies of the 1939 World’s Fair had been distilled into these voluptuous chariots. It wasn’t so much a “car” but a kind of futuristic streamlined locomotive or ocean liner that glided smoothly, powerfully, effortlessly across the landscape.
New refinements were made each year, and eventually land travel became too pedestrian for these Buicks, and they were now shown soaring through blue skies with fighter jets, or even shooting off into outer space and traveling among the stars.
1957 saw the introduction of an all-new design; longer, lower, and sleeker than anything which had come before. This had been the prevailing trend. The market demanded that each year’s new model had to be more spectacular than the last. We can see where this is leading. So enter . . .
. . . the “B-58” Buick. The culmination of what Buick designers had been reaching for since the end of World War II. A car of overpowering size and stature, with little sparkles everywhere, because this car is so NEW! There are dual Vista-Vision headlights, and a Dynastar grille with 160 faceted chrome squares (like “diamonds on black velvet”, according to Buick.) The fenders, as described by Alberto Martinez in his book American Automobiles are veritable “poems in chrome–a symphony of reflection.” There are Vee’d circles and gunsights, bumper bombs, sweep-spears, a steeply-raked Panoramic windshield, something that looks like a stingray in flight–all finished off with Twin-Tower tail lights topped by chrome-bespangled tail fins. Wow!
Not that these B-58 Buicks were all style and no substance. Mechanically, there were “more important gains that Buick has ever made in a single year.” These included a more powerful high compression B-12000 V-8 engine, spherical [ball] joint suspension, improved Variable-Pitch and all-new Flight-Pitch Dynaflow transmissions, finned aluminum brake drums, improved Miracle Ride, and optional Air-Poise suspension which floats you on 4 columns of air. (The less said about that last one, the better.)
But let’s get to our subject car itself. This is actually a “stripper Buick”, but with all the chrome trim, you’d never know it! This Special was the lowest-priced Buick 4-door you could buy. Note that it has no bright trim around the window frames. That was an optional extra on the Special. So if you wanted a ’58 Buick with as little chrome as possible, this is it!
Buick salesmen were encouraged to “Sell the Big ‘B’ over the Little 3!” It turns out that this 1958 Special sedan was priced just slightly above the top models of Chevy/Ford/Plymouth. Buick in 1958 covered 75% of the new car market, from this far-from-plain Special, to Century, Super, and the long and lush Roadmaster and Limited series. In fact, the Special was priced less than Oldsmobile’s lowest-priced Dynamic 88, and just a smidge over the cheapest Pontiac Chieftain, which is really quite unexpected.
So now let’s take a close look at all the fascinating “aircraft-inspired” details of this newest Buick yet. When seen this close, they take on the form of finely-crafted, modern art masterpieces that almost become architectural. We’ll start with longer views, and then really hone in:
Inside:
Engine:
In 1958, MAD magazine predicted that “Soon we will have chrome cars–and then they’ll introduce paint trim!” That turned out not to be. But what do you do for ’59 to surpass the dazzling “Air Born” ’58s that are so new, new, NEW? Well, this:
What a miracle Detroit hath wrought! Who would have expected this? Suddenly, all former Buicks were now passe. The sleek look of forward thrust has reached its ultimate! But truly, by following the old paradigm there was nowhere to go from here. The 1960 models were like ’59s but toned down instead of being even more radical; in ’61 we lost the panoramic windshield and the fins; as the 1960s progressed the models became plainer, more boxy, minimalist.
By 1966, we were left with this. The Special is now a compact/intermediate, about as long as a ’54 Buick (but on a shorter wheelbase). Instead of selling just above C/F/P, this Special sold at Chevy prices, meaning any prestige of the Buick name is mostly lost. And the Buick exclusives like Dynaflow, Torque Tube, and the foot starter are no more. In the ads it doesn’t fly through outer space with a red afterburner glow shooting back from the taillights. Close-up photos of this car won’t reveal very much. The full-size models are bigger, but have a similar boxy look that causes no one to gasp with astonishment.
Of course, there were still cars designed to be exciting and bold, but they had names like Riviera, Toronado, Mustang, Camaro, Thunderbird–all sporty personal luxury coupes. The regular lines of the Big Three seemed much less inspired. The bean counters and the federal government were taking over. Penny-pinchers and bureaucrats–not the kind of people we’d expect to create cars that stir the imagination and reach new heights of artistic creativity.
So that’s my take on the 1958 Buicks, and the rather short-lived “Golden Age of Gorp”. The ’58s (and the ’59s) are, I believe, some of the most spectacularly-designed mainstream cars ever built. All Buicks of the 1950s were unique, one-year-only designs–produced for one year, and then no more. True “Limited” editions that were very “Special”.
I am probably one of the youngest people who remembers these cars from youth and was strangely drawn to them. Into the 1980s there were still a few ’58 Buicks in my area (as well as some ’57, ’59, and ’60 Chevrolets; even a ’59 Chrysler and a ’60 Imperial!) that were still being driven as daily drivers by older people–evidence of the cars’ solid durability. Like other late ’50s cars, they really stood out! But younger adults who have had no personal memories or emotional connections to cars of this era–will they appreciate them and have a desire to own and preserve surviving examples? And have you considered–how many people living today have no idea these cars once existed (and probably don’t even care?)
I find myself born into a unique time in history–old enough to remember some of the glories of the 20th century, but young enough to benefit from 21st century technology, advancements, and discoveries. Where do we go from here?
This is a great pairing with the pale pink one I wrote up several years ago – the black paint completely changes the character of the car.
I had never noticed how much the front of a 59 Ford resembles the front of this car (although the Ford is far les ornate).
I am also amazed at the complete transformation of the same body between 1957 and 1958. The 57 is all smooth curves and swoops, and the 58 is all straight lines and corners. How the same styling studio made such an about-face from one year to the next is a mystery. I think the only thing I can see that comes even close to this kind of transformation is the 1955 and 1956 Studebakers. But Studebaker did it because they couldn’t afford anything else. Buick (and Olds and Cadillac) did it because they wanted to.
And let me guess – attractively priced at only $29,000? We have a Gateway showroom locally and it is a fun place to browse. But their prices seem insane to me.
Actually, $19,500.
Agreed. I was browsing gateway and came across this resale red Mustang convertible for $33,000(!!!) looked pretty in the thumbnail, and couldn’t help but click on it but almost instantly scrolling through pics I started to note the various dents all over it, and a look closer reveals it’s clearly held together by bondo, look at the fender/quarter panel to rocker seams, or I should say the lack there of!
https://www.gatewayclassiccars.com/vehicle/TPA/2247/1966-Ford-Mustang
Agree, JPC.
And they are impossible to “dicker on the sticker” with.
The battery size is a truck/bus type battery. You may not find one at Walmart or Costco, but other battery vendors carry them. For my 56 Cadillac, I replaced the flooded battery of this type with an AGM replica-style battery. It is well down behind the passenger wheel well, much harder to install than the 58 Buick it looks like!
What a great article Stephen! I’ve never been a fan of the ’58 Buicks-with all the chrome slathered on them every time I saw one I was reminded of Bruce McCall’s parody “the ’58 Bulgemobiles. But this Special is more restrained on the chrome and with the exception of the overly ornate front grill is actually rather tasteful for the era. The black paint also helps.
As someone who is and always has been meticulous with keeping my vehicles as clean as possible, this may very well be the scariest ownership prospect I could think of for myself. I do very much like it, but black paint and all that chrome is intimidating enough to give serious pause. The grill takes it to a completely different level, however. All I end up seeing is hours adding up in the garage with a toothbrush and a bad attitude.
I can confirm your fears! There are 164 squares on th grill of my ’58 Buick Century..at least 1 toothbrush and several hours. And the other models of ’58 Buicks have even more chrome
Odd coincidence: another “Bob Eddy Buick” dealer badge sold on eBay just two days ago—-go figure: https://www.ebay.com/itm/275479412311?nma=true&si=4qunRPK4G5Ku99mxLUvkq%252BnxxFA%253D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
It looks great in black even if it is the poverty pack edition it was an era of more chrome is better from GM, detailing a dirty 58 Buick would be a nightmare, I m,uch prefer my 5 minutes with a washbroom and a quick waterblast every year or so, but black isnt the colour for that, I notice the guy with a black Nissan Fuga where I work has it in the wash bay at least once a week.
I’m old enough to remember them well, as the Buick dealer was about 500 yards down the street from dad’s Chevrolet dealership. With a second floor service department, accessed by a steep, narrow ramp that many customers hated (it had a lot to do with why I ended up with my ’37 Special a decade later).
Invariably, all the articles on the ’58 Buick center on the Limited . . . . as the prime example of how Harley Earl had lost the narrative by the 1958 models. It’s refreshing to see a bottom of the line Special, showing that these cars, while hardly beautiful, weren’t all that bad if the chrome was kept to a minimum. Well, minimum by 50’s standards, anyhow.
That ’59 was such an improvement over the ’58’s. And Buick is the only line where it could be said about such a comparison.
Bare bones Specials forever!
Regarding comments about cleaning/detailing a ’58 Buick, Alberto Martinez wrote this in his book:
“These Buicks were either loved or left. Either their owners rapidly got fed up with them or they turned themselves into contortionists to polish each centimetre. The flanks of these bulldozer-cars were thus made to shine in reflection of their power . . . For me, however, this style [the ’58s & the ’59s] was one of the most perfect expressions of what was understood by the ‘Fifties’ in America.”
As we all know, beauty is always high maintenance. However, I had a ’58 Cadillac in black and I didn’t consider keeping it nice all that burdensome:
I have a ’58 that I’m looking to sell. Any one interested in making an offer? No title, no keys, just sitting up waiting to be hauled off, if the price is right!
I’m old enough to remember these on the streets of Iowa City; there were one or two in our neighborhood. But by the time we arrived in the fall of 1960, when the new ’61s were just coming out, they looked mighty old fashioned. Things were changing quickly.
I remember riding in one, with a friend from school. The interior and dash made a strong impression on me.
The ’58 Buick has gone down in history as being the poster boy of why Americans soured on big cars, and bought imports, Ramblers and Larks in droves until the Gig 3 compacts arrived in 1960. Americans realized in 1958 that the trend in big cars had finally jumped the shark, with the Buick at the head of the pack.
That’s doesn’t look like something from Life magazine, but anyway the writer nailed it: “thunderous amalgam of outdated ideas.”
It’s been discussed before, but even as a little kid I was sure that GM saw the 1957 Ford and Chrysler cars and an edict went out to all the divisions to decorate the hell out of everything GM for the next year to distract from the old school Harley Earle style it was way too late to do anything about. And completely new lower cleaner bodies for everything ASAP, which would be 1959, and skip having two or three basic bodies for time but just have one. They ditched the all-new Chevy-Pontiac bodies after only one year, but put the 1959s on their also all-new 1958 frames and suspension and maybe floor pans(?)
It’s interesting how Buick kept some of the old cues for 1959 (1958 grille pattern, descending curved chrome on the sides reinterpreted as descending linear slash of chrome) while losing all the curvy heaviness that they had characterized Buicks forever – along with the ventiports and model names.
That price array from Consumer Reports is very interesting to look over…strange how neither Ford nor Chrysler had a brand in the +/- $4000-$5000 range….the meat of Buick’s upper market.
I’ve always found the ’58 Buick gloriously hideous (including Grandma’s turquoise Special with the air suspension, always good for tossing my cookies with her stop-and-go driving after she’d take all the grandkids out for a fancy lunch). The black paint certainly makes the car more likeable IMO….
Stephen: I too remember the ’58s – or rather one particular car. My family moved to a new neighborhood in the same town in the spring of 1961. Two doors south lived a blue and white ’58 Buick four door sedan. It was certainly not a Roadmaster but one of the shorter cars.
I remember it because I thought it was ugly and because Buicks were not common in our town or neighborhood. To me, Chevrolet and Oldsmobile were the norm and Pontiacs were around. Buick was an exception. My dad at that time had a ’61 Dynamic 88 four door sedan in silver; it was a much better looking car than the neighbor’s Buick.
I don’t see how these are significantly cheaper to build than the Roadmaster to justify the difference in price. C-P-O must have been pissed that corporate didn’t enforce the Sloan ladder.
For my money Oldsmobile was the most garish ’58 GM car, but Buick wasn’t far behind.
At least the Buick’s style is more coherent; it doesn’t look like two different cars joined at the B-pillar. What amazes me about the Buick is how even the cheap not-so-special Special gets the full rear door and fender metal trim applique.
I never really got the 58 Buick hate, the rear end is little more offensive and overdecorated as the vaunted 57 Bel Air, and the front end design is just plain attractive, actually relatively subdued compared to many other 1958 quad headlight designs. I get the whole bulgemobile thing but to me the 58 Oldsmobile is the real posterchild, these 58s may not be my favorite Buicks of the 50s but they’re more interesting to me than the 55-56s and actually less weird looking than the 59s
This was my second car after the 55 Chevy Two-ten detonated its blue flame six.
I bought the 58 Super couple in 1965 for $300. A couple of steel panels filled in the rust at the quarters aft of the doors, but otherwise an acceptable winter car for college.
Everything worked fine, although a poor kid only fed it regular gas and it pinged even with the timing cranked. Rear ended in a year that crumpled all that chrome clear into the backlight. It was a bear in the deep snows of Michigan.
Just UGLY. If the dumpy looking body doesn`t turn you off, all that chrome obviously applied with a trowel, plus the ultra heavy looking grille, bumpers, and rear end treatment certainly will. 1950s GM excess in overdrive.
The 1958 model year introduction was the earliest I clearly remember, including all the hoopla for the Edsel. As a 5-year-old, I was entranced by all the new styling, and the Chevy Impala was my favorite.
Some 25 or so years ago, there was a small used car lot very close to where we still live. I think it may have been part of a Rent-a-Wreck franchise. They had a battleship gray Buick Special 4-door sedan like this one in good shape; asking price was $8200.
We had a neighbor who had a black 2 door ’58 Special hardtop. Thought it was ugly then and I’ll stand by that assessment. Buick and Olds of ’58 are the 2 ugliest cars of the ’50s. People rant about the ’58 Lincoln but at least it didn’t have all that chrome piled on and it had some stylish elements if you can get beyond it’s face. We are so lucky that there was a design mutiny at GM when the ’57 Chryslers came out or else we would have been subjected to even more extreme baroque versions of those ’58s as new ’59s.
The “Pontiac”, iteration, of the “hulking , 58, big GM’s” is my fav.
That’s a real stripper for a Buick. In black and minus most of the chrome, it almost reminds me of the Studebaker Scotsman. Made for a buyer with similar sensibilities at different price ranges that year.
Speaking of price range, that chart completely foreshadows the future. Even if you know nothing about the cars themselves, you can tell which brands would eventually be discontinued: Edsel, Olds, Pontiac and DeSoto. Just look at how superfluous they all are as their price range is fully covered by other divisions in the GM, Ford and Chrysler line-ups. Some held on longer than others, but it was all already clear by 1958. The market coverage of Packard is barely there at all, with a wide gap between it and Studebaker. Again, just looking at the chart, you can tell that the situation there was completely untenable – and Packard would be the first to go.
Another one of my early finds, a black 1958 Buick Special located at a gas station or repair shop somewhere along Rt. 46 near Kenvil NJ, 1991.
Things have changed; I’ve having trouble pinpointing this exact location today.
Photo: